Metabolic side effects and pharmacogenetics of second-generation antipsychotics in children

Effect of antipsychotics and mood stabilisers on metabolism in bipolar disorder: a network meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials

Background

Antipsychotics and mood stabilisers are gathering attention for the disturbance of metabolism. This network meta-analysis aims to evaluate and rank the metabolic effects of the commonly used antipsychotics and mood stabilisers in treating bipolar disorder (BD).

Methods

Registries including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, and Google Scholar were searched before February 15th, 2024, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) applying antipsychotics or mood stabilisers for BD treatment. The observed outcomes were twelve metabolic indicators. The data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and confirmed by another four reviewers and a corresponding author. The above six reviewers all participated in data analyses. Data extraction was based on PRISMA guidelines, and quality assessment was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook. Use a random effects model for data pooling. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023466669.

Findings

Together, 5421 records were identified, and 41 publications with 11,678 complete-trial participants were confirmed eligible. After eliminating possible sensitivity, risperidone ranked 1st in elevating fasting serum glucose (SUCRA = 90.7%) and serum insulin (SUCRA = 96.6%). Lurasidone was most likely to elevate HbA1c (SUCRA = 82.1%). Olanzapine ranked 1st in elevating serum TC (SUCRA = 93.3%), TG (SUCRA = 89.6%), and LDL (SUCRA = 94.7%). Lamotrigine ranked 1st in reducing HDL (SUCRA = 82.6%). Amisulpride ranked 1st in elevating body weight (SUCRA = 100.0%). For subgroup analyses, quetiapine is more likely to affect indicators of glucose metabolism among male adult patients with bipolar mania, while long-term lurasidone tended to affect glucose metabolism among female patients with bipolar depression. Among patients under 18, divalproex tended to affect glucose metabolism, with lithium affecting lipid metabolism. In addition, most observed antipsychotics performed higher response and remission rates than placebo, and displayed a similar dropout rate with placebo, while no between-group significance of rate was observed among mood stabilisers.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that overall, antipsychotics are effective in treating BD, while they are also more likely to disturb metabolism than mood stabilisers. Attention should be paid to individual applicability in clinical practice. The results put forward evidence-based information and clinical inspiration for drug compatibility and further research of the BD mechanism.

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2506200), and the Research Project of Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory (No. JNL-2023001B).

The FTO rs9939609 Variant Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Disease Risk and Dietary Energy Intakes in Children with Mental Health Disorders

Background

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are used to treat children for mental health disorders but in some children they cause cardiometabolic complications including weight gain and type 2 diabetes. Genetic variants can place a child at risk of developing these metabolic complications. The fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) rs9939609 A allele has been associated with obesity and dietary energy intakes in healthy children but its relation to metabolic complications in SGA-treated children is not known.

Objectives

This study investigated the association of the FTO rs9939609 variant and SGA treatment with cardiometabolic complications and dietary intakes in children with mental health disorders.

Methods

A cross-sectional population of children (≤18 y; n = 506) with mental health disorders that were SGA-treated (n = 197) and SGA-naïve (n = 309) were recruited through the Department of Psychiatry at BC Children's Hospital. Dietary intakes were estimated using 3-d food records in a subset of children (n = 73).

Results

Genotype frequencies were not different between SGA-treated (TT genotype 42.6%, TA genotype 38.6%, AA genotype 18.8%) and SGA-naïve (TT 41.1%, TA 39.5%, AA 19.4%) children. Children with the A allele had lower BMI z-sores compared with the TT genotype (0.84 ± 1.19 compared with 1.19 ± 1.36; P = 0.005, adjusted for ethnicity). We observed an interaction between FTO genotype and SGA status on fasting glucose (P = 0.036). SGA-naïve children with the A allele had higher fasting glucose than those with the TT genotype (4.96 ± 0.35 compared with 4.81 ± 0.35 mmol/L; P = 0.001), in adjusted models (age, sex, ethnicity, and BMI z-score). This was not observed in SGA-treated children. Children with the A allele had higher daily total energy intakes compared with the TT genotype (1994 ± 619 compared with 1814 ± 484 kcal/d; P = 0.048), in adjusted models (age, sex, ethnicity, and BMI z-score); no effect of SGA-treatment was observed.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest the A allele of the FTO rs9939609 variant is associated with higher BMI in children with mental health disorders, but only in those not treated with SGAs.

Identification of EP300 as a Key Gene Involved in Antipsychotic-Induced Metabolic Dysregulation Based on Integrative Bioinformatics Analysis of Multi-Tissue Gene Expression Data

Antipsychotics (APs) are associated with weight gain and other metabolic abnormalities such as hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome. This translational study aimed to uncover the underlying molecular mechanisms and identify the key genes involved in AP-induced metabolic effects. An integrative gene expression analysis was performed in four different mouse tissues (striatum, liver, pancreas and adipose) after risperidone or olanzapine treatment. The analytical approach combined the identification of the gene co-expression modules related to AP treatment, gene set enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction network construction. We found several co-expression modules of genes involved in glucose and lipid homeostasis, hormone regulation and other processes related to metabolic impairment. Among these genes, EP300, which encodes an acetyltransferase involved in transcriptional regulation, was identified as the most important hub gene overlapping the networks of both APs. Then, we explored the genetically predicted EP300 expression levels in a cohort of 226 patients with first-episode psychosis who were being treated with APs to further assess the association of this gene with metabolic alterations. The EP300 expression levels were significantly associated with increases in body weight, body mass index, total cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and triglyceride concentrations after 6 months of AP treatment. Taken together, our analysis identified EP300 as a key gene in AP-induced metabolic abnormalities, indicating that the dysregulation of EP300 function could be important in the development of these side effects. However, more studies are needed to disentangle the role of this gene in the mechanism of action of APs.

GLP1 receptor agonism protects against acute olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia

Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) used in the treatment of schizophrenia and a number of off-label conditions. Although effective in reducing psychoses, acute olanzapine treatment causes hyperglycemia. Pharmacological agonists of the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor have been shown to offset weight gain associated with chronic SGA administration. It is not known whether GLP1 receptor agonism would mitigate the acute metabolic side effects of SGAs. Within this context, we sought to determine whether pharmacological targeting of the GLP1 receptor would be sufficient to protect against acute olanzapine-induced impairments in glucose and lipid homeostasis. Male C57BL/6J mice were treated with olanzapine and/or the GLP1 receptor agonists liraglutide and exendin 4, and the blood glucose response was measured. We found that liraglutide or exendin 4 completely protected male mice against olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia in parallel with increases in circulating insulin (liraglutide, exendin 4) and reductions in glucagon (liraglutide only). In additional experiments, female mice, which are protected from acute olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia, displayed hyperglycemia, increases in glucagon, and reductions in insulin when treated with olanzapine and the GLP1 receptor antagonist exendin 9-39 compared with olanzapine treatment alone. Although in some instances the pharmacological targeting of the GLP1 receptor attenuated indexes of olanzapine-induced lipolysis, increases in liver triglyceride accumulation were not impacted. Our findings provide evidence that signaling through the GLP1 receptor can remarkably influence acute olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia, and from the standpoint of protecting against acute excursions in blood glucose, GLP1 receptor agonists should be considered as an adjunct treatment approach.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Antipsychotic drugs cause rapid perturbations in glucose and lipid metabolism. In the present study we have demonstrated that cotreatment with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists, such as liraglutide, protects against metabolic dysregulation caused by the antipsychotic drug olanzapine. These findings suggest that pharmacological targeting of the GLP1 receptor could be an effective adjunct approach to mitigate the harmful acute metabolic side effects of antipsychotic drugs.

Female mice are protected against acute olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia

Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) used frequently in the treatment of schizophrenia and a growing list of off-label conditions. Though effective in reducing psychoses, acute olanzapine treatment causes rapid increases in blood glucose that are believed to be mediated by increases in liver glucose output, skeletal muscle insulin resistance, and beta cell dysfunction. Further, the acute lipidemic response to olanzapine has been largely unexplored. While females have been reported to be more susceptible to olanzapine-induced weight gain, there is little known about the impact of sex on the acute response to SGAs. The purpose of this study was to determine if the acute effects of SGAs on glucose and lipid metabolism display a sexually dimorphic response in C57BL/6 J mice and examine potential mechanisms mediating this effect. Age matched male and female C57BL/6 J mice were treated with olanzapine (5 mg/ kg, IP) or vehicle control and blood glucose was measured at baseline, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min post-treatment and tissues and serum harvested. These experiments were repeated, and mice underwent an insulin (0.5 IU/kg) or pyruvate tolerance test (2 g/kg) following 60 min of olanzapine treatment. Females were protected against olanzapine-induced increases in blood glucose and pyruvate intolerance compared to male mice, and this occurred despite the development of severe insulin resistance. In male mice olanzapine increased the glucagon:insulin ratio whereas in females this ratio was reduced. When challenged with exogenous glucagon (1 mg/kg IP), females were less responsive than males. Male and female mice displayed similar increases in whole body fatty acid oxidation, serum fatty acids and liver triglyceride accumulation. Our findings provide evidence that while there are no apparent sex differences in the lipid metabolism response to olanzapine, that females are protected from acute olanzapine-induced excursions in blood glucose. This is likely due in part to reductions in the glucagon:insulin ratio and glucagon responsiveness which could impact olanzapine induced increases in liver glucose production.

The effects of antipsychotic medications on microbiome and weight gain in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Atypical antipsychotics, also known as second-generation antipsychotics, are commonly prescribed as treatment for psychotic disorders in adults, as well as in children and adolescents with behavioral problems. However, in many cases, second-generation antipsychotics have unwanted side effects, such as weight gain, potentially further increasing risk for morbidities including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. While various mechanisms for this weight gain have been proposed, including effects on metabolic hormone signaling, recent evidence points to the importance of the gut microbiome in this process. The microbial communities residing within the gut are affected by second-generation antipsychotics and can confer weight gain.

MAIN TEXT

This review summarizes recent findings and presents data linking second-generation antipsychotics, gut microbiota alterations and weight gain. The review focuses on children and adolescent populations, which have not previously received much attention, but are of great interest because they may be most vulnerable to gut microbiome changes and may carry long-term metabolic effects into adulthood.

CONCLUSIONS

We present correlations between second-generation antipsychotics, gut microbiota alterations and weight gain, and suggest some mechanisms that may link them. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms may lead to the design of improved treatments for psychotic disorders with fewer harmful side effects.

Risperidone But Not Quetiapine Treatment Is Associated With Increased Appetite But Not Satiety Hormones in Children During An Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are commonly used to treat children with mental health conditions (MHCs) but are associated with adverse effects including obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes. The mechanisms underlying these complications are unknown, but it has been suggested that SGAs increase appetite leading to weight gain. The present objective was to perform a pilot study to investigate appetite and satiety hormones in SGA-treated (risperidone or quetiapine) and SGA-naive children with similar mental health conditions.

METHODS

Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were conducted in SGA-naive (n = 18), risperidone-treated (n = 20), and quetiapine-treated (n = 16) children recruited from the British Columbia Children's Hospital Psychiatry Department. Over 5 time-points during the OGTT, appetite questionnaires using a visual analogue scale were administered, and blood was collected to measure ghrelin, peptide YY, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon-like protein 1, leptin, and adiponectin. Mixed model analyses were conducted to examine between-group differences.

RESULTS

The children were similar in age, psychiatric diagnosis, and global assessment of functioning scores. Body mass index z-scores were also similar between groups. Appetite was increased during the OGTT in the risperidone-treated compared with the SGA-naive group for 2 questions ("How strong is your desire to eat"; P = 0.003 and "How much food do you think you can eat"; P = 0.028). No differences in satiety hormones were observed between the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone treatment in youth is associated with elevated appetite during an OGTT, with no differences in gut peptides or adipocytokines to explain risperidone's effect on appetite. Further research is needed to explore other mediators of weight gain and metabolic dysfunction in SGA-treated youth.

AICAR Prevents Acute Olanzapine-Induced Disturbances in Glucose Homeostasis

Olanzapine (OLZ) is an antipsychotic drug used in the treatment of schizophrenia. Although effective in reducing psychoses, OLZ causes acute increases in blood glucose. The acute effects of OLZ on hyperglycemia are likely caused by reductions in insulin secretion, insulin resistance, and increased hepatic glucose production. 5AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an energy sensor activated during exercise that can increase insulin sensitivity and insulin-independent glucose uptake in muscle. 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR) is a pharmacologic agent that, among other effects, can activate AMPK in vivo. Conversely, hypothalamic activation of AMPK has been suggested to mediate the hyperglycemic effects of OLZ. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether cotreatment with AICAR could prevent acute OLZ-induced hyperglycemia in lean and obese C57BL6/J mice. OLZ (5 mg/kg, i.p.) caused rapid increases in blood glucose, a blunted insulin response, and pyruvate intolerance, all of which were prevented with AICAR cotreatment in both lean and obese mice. AICAR did not affect OLZ-induced changes in whole-body substrate oxidation or energy expenditure. Peripheral injection of AICAR, but not OLZ, activated AMPK signaling in the hypothalamus. The results of the current study provide evidence that AICAR prevents OLZ-induced hyperglycemia, despite increasing hypothalamic AMPK signaling. These protective effects were associated with the preservation of whole-body insulin action and reductions in markers of liver glucose production.

Obesity exacerbates the acute metabolic side effects of olanzapine

Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic used in the management of schizophrenia and various off-label conditions. The acute metabolic responses of olanzapine recapitulate many of the side effects associated with obesity. Obesity rates are high in the schizophrenic population, but it is unknown whether pre-existing obesity-associated metabolic dysfunction augments the acute side effects of olanzapine. To address this question, we compared the responses to olanzapine in lean and high-fat diet-induced (HFD) obese mice. Four weeks of HFD (60%kcal from fat) led to obese, hyperglycemic, and insulin resistant mice. Olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia and systemic insulin resistance were exacerbated in HFD-induced obese mice. Olanzapine also profoundly inhibited insulin signalling in skeletal muscle and liver, which appears to be exacerbated by obesity. The greater olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia may also result from increased hepatic glucose output in obese mice as pyruvate challenge led to significantly higher blood glucose concentrations, with associated increases in hepatic content of gluconeogenic enzymes. Olanzapine also suppressed RER while acutely increasing oxygen consumption in obese mice. A single olanzapine treatment reduced physical activity for up to 24h, regardless of obesity. Considering obesity is very common in the schizophrenic population, these data suggest that previous research may be under-estimating the severity of olanzapine's acute side effects.

Executive Function Deficits in Seriously Ill Children-Emerging Challenges and Possibilities for Clinical Care

The past years have seen an incredible increase in the quality and success rates of treatments in pediatric medicine. One of the resulting major challenges refers to the management of primary or secondary residual executive function deficits in affected children. These deficits lead to problems in the ability to acquire, understand, and apply abstract and complex knowledge and to plan, direct, and control actions. Executive functions deficits are important to consider because they are highly predictive of functioning in social and academic aspects of daily life. We argue that current clinical practice does not sufficiently account for the complex cognitive processes in this population. This is because widely applied pharmacological interventions only rarely account for the complexity of the underlying neuronal mechanisms and do not fit well into possibly powerful "individualized medicine" approaches. Novel treatment approaches targeting deficits in executive functions in seriously ill children could focus on neuronal oscillations, as these have some specific relations to different aspects of executive function. Importantly, such treatment approaches can be individually tailored to the individuals' deficits and can be transferred into home-treatment or e-health solutions. These approaches are easy-to-use, can be easily integrated into daily life, and are becoming increasingly cost-effective.

Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane Review, last published in 2012 (Loy 2012). Children and youths with disruptive behaviour disorders may present to health services, where they may be treated with atypical antipsychotics. There is increasing usage of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of disruptive behaviour disorders.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect and safety of atypical antipsychotics, compared to placebo, for treating disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths. The aim was to evaluate each drug separately rather than the class effect, on the grounds that each atypical antipsychotic has different pharmacologic binding profile (Stahl 2013) and that this is clinically more useful.

SEARCH METHODS

In January 2017, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases and two trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of atypical antipsychotics versus placebo in children and youths aged up to and including 18 years, with a diagnosis of disruptive behaviour disorders, including comorbid ADHD. The primary outcomes were aggression, conduct problems and adverse events (i.e. weight gain/changes and metabolic parameters). The secondary outcomes were general functioning, noncompliance, other adverse events, social functioning, family functioning, parent satisfaction and school functioning.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors (JL and KS) independently collected, evaluated and extracted data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. We performed meta-analyses for each of our primary outcomes, except for metabolic parameters, due to inadequate outcome data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials (spanning 2000 to 2014), involving a total of 896 children and youths aged five to 18 years. Bar two trials, all came from an outpatient setting. Eight trials assessed risperidone, one assessed quetiapine and one assessed ziprasidone. Nine trials assessed acute efficacy (over four to 10 weeks); one of which combined treatment with stimulant medication and parent training. One trial was a six-month maintenance trial assessing symptom recurrence.The quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. Nine studies had some degree of pharmaceutical support/funding. Primary outcomesUsing the mean difference (MD), we combined data from three studies (238 participants) in a meta-analysis of aggression, as assessed using the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (ABC) ‒ Irritability subscale. We found that youths treated with risperidone show reduced aggression compared to youths treated with placebo (MD -6.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.79 to -4.19; low-quality evidence). Using the standardised mean difference (SMD), we pooled data from two risperidone trials (190 participants), which used different scales: the Overt Aggression Scale ‒ Modified (OAS-M) Scale and the Antisocial Behaviour Scale (ABS); as the ABS had two subscales that could not be combined (reactive and proactive aggression), we performed two separate analyses. When we combined the ABS Reactive subscale and the OAS-M, the SMD was -1.30 in favour of risperidone (95% CI -2.21 to -0.40, moderate-quality evidence). When we combined the ABS Proactive subscale and OAS-M, the SMD was -1.12 (95% CI -2.30 to 0.06, moderate-quality evidence), suggesting uncertainty about the estimate of effect, as the confidence intervals overlapped the null value. In summary, there was some evidence that aggression could be reduced by risperidone. Data were lacking on other atypical antipsychotics, like quetiapine and ziprasidone, with regard to their effects on aggression.We pooled data from two risperidone trials (225 participants) in a meta-analysis of conduct problems, as assessed using the Nisonger Child Behaviour Rating Form ‒ Conduct Problem subscale (NCBRF-CP). This yielded a final mean score that was 8.61 points lower in the risperidone group compared to the placebo group (95% CI -11.49 to -5.74; moderate-quality evidence).We investigated the effect on weight by performing two meta-analyses. We wanted to distinguish between the effects of antipsychotic medication only and the combined effect with stimulants, since the latter can have a counteracting effect on weight gain due to appetite suppression. Pooling two trials with risperidone only (138 participants), we found that participants on risperidone gained 2.37 kilograms (kg) more (95% CI 0.26 to 4.49; moderate-quality evidence) than those on placebo. When we added a trial where all participants received a combination of risperidone and stimulants, we found that those on the combined treatment gained 2.14 kg more (95% CI 1.04 to 3.23; 3 studies; 305 participants; low-quality evidence) than those on placebo. Secondary outcomesOut of the 10 included trials, three examined general functioning, social functioning and parent satisfaction. No trials examined family or school functioning. Data on non-compliance/attrition rate and other adverse events were available from all 10 trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence that in the short term risperidone may reduce aggression and conduct problems in children and youths with disruptive behaviour disorders There is also evidence that this intervention is associated with significant weight gain.For aggression, the difference in scores of 6.49 points on the ABC ‒ Irritability subscale (range 0 to 45) may be clinically significant. It is challenging to interpret the clinical significance of the differential findings on two different ABS subscales as it may be difficult to distinguish between reactive and proactive aggression in clinical practice. For conduct problems, the difference in scores of 8.61 points on the NCBRF-CP (range 0 to 48) is likely to be clinically significant. Weight gain remains a concern.Caution is required in interpreting the results due to the limitations of current evidence and the small number of high-quality trials. There is a lack of evidence to support the use of quetiapine, ziprasidone or any other atypical antipsychotic for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths and no evidence for children under five years of age. It is uncertain to what degree the efficacy found in clinical trials will translate into real-life clinical practice. Given the effectiveness of parent-training interventions in the management of these disorders, and the somewhat equivocal evidence on the efficacy of medication, it is important not to use medication alone. This is consistent with current clinical guidelines.

Glucagon receptor knockout mice are protected against acute olanzapine-induced hyperglycemia

OBJECTIVES

To determine if glucagon is involved in mediating the increase in blood glucose levels caused by the second-generation antipsychotic drug olanzapine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Whole body glucagon receptor deficient mice (Gcgr^-/-) or WT littermate controls were injected with olanzapine (5mg/kg BW IP) and changes in blood glucose measured over the following 120min. Separate cohorts of mice were treated with olanzapine and changes in pyruvate tolerance, insulin tolerance and whole body substrate oxidation were determined.

RESULTS

Olanzapine treatment increased serum glucagon and lead to rapid increases in blood glucose concentrations in WT mice. Gcgr^-/- mice were protected against olanzapine-induced increases in blood glucose but this was not explained by differences in terminal serum insulin concentrations, enhanced AKT phosphorylation in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue or liver or differences in RER. In both genotypes olanzapine induced an equivalent degree of insulin resistance as measured using an insulin tolerance test. Olanzapine treatment led to an exaggerated glucose response to a pyruvate challenge in WT but not Gcgr^-/- mice and this was paralleled by reductions in the protein content of PEPCK and G6Pase in livers from Gcgr^-/- mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Gcgr^-/- mice are protected against olanzapine-induced increases in blood glucose. This is likely a result of reductions in liver glucose output, perhaps secondary to decreases in PEPCK and G6Pase protein content. Our findings highlight the central role of the liver in mediating olanzapine-induced disturbances in glucose homeostasis.

Clinical use of second-generation antipsychotics in children

Background

The use of second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication among child and adolescent psychiatric patients has increased worldwide in recent years. The increase appears to have been more extensive in the USA than in European countries, but the tendency is similar. However, after a peak the use seems to have declined in the USA. Simultaneously with the increasing numbers, the duration of SGA use has lengthened, indications have broadened, and off-label use has increased. Despite existing follow-up recommendations and evidence for the metabolic adverse effects of SGAs in children, research evidence has not translated into clinical practice.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical use and follow-up practices of SGA medication among child psychiatric patients of one university hospital in Finland.

Method

This retrospective patient report-based study was conducted at the Child Psychiatric Clinic of Tampere University Hospital, Finland. The study sample consisted of 133 patients who were younger than 13 years when initiating SGA treatment and had an ongoing SGA medication during the study period. The study sample was divided into two groups according to diagnosis to examine whether there were differences between patients with an autistic or a developmental disorder (F83-84) and patients with other psychiatric diagnoses.

Results:

This study showed that SGA use in children younger than 13 years was mainly off-label. Irrespective of diagnosis, the most common indication was aggression. Especially children with psychiatric diagnoses other than developmental disorders had multiple socio-demographic risk factors and adverse life experiences in their background. The follow-up practices were diverse and partly irregular.

Conclusions:

A need for systematic SGA monitoring practices and dialogue between the medical specialities treating children and their families is evident.