Bone availability for mandibular molar distalization in adults with mandibular prognathism

Identification of key determinant for predicting feasible mandibular molars distalization

Background/purpose

The distal movement of mandibular molar is effective treatment strategy, while it is still difficult to determine if the posterior available space is sufficient or not for mandibular molar distalization before treatment. Thus, this study aimed to identify the measurement items of lateral cephalograms with the potential to accurately predict the posterior anatomical limit of mandibular molar distalization.

Materials and methods

Cephalometric images of 26 patients were used. We establish five landmarks: the distal contact point (D7), the distal root apex (R7), the distal tooth cervix (TC) of the mandibular second molar, the anterior border of the ramus (ABR) and the external oblique line of the mandible (E). The D7-ABR and the vertical height between TC and E (TC-V), the distal movements of D7 and R7 during treatment (D7D, R7D) were measured. The subjects were divided into bodily-like and tipping movement group, according to the ratio D7D/R7D.

Results

Significant differences in D7D and R7D were found between the bodily-like movement and tipping movement groups (P < 0.01). Moreover, TC-V was significantly larger in the bodily-like movement group (P < 0.01). A positive correlation was found between TC-V and D7D (r = 0.68) and between TC-V and R7D (r = 0.69), indicating that TC-V has the potential to make accurate predictions for D7D and R7D. D7-ABR did not show a positive correlation with R7D.

Conclusion

Using TC-V can strengthen the prediction of available posterior space for mandibular molar distalization.

The morphology of alveolar bone of the mandibular second and third molars in skeletal Class III patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the alveolar bone morphology of the mandibular second and third molars in skeletal Class III patients from a buccolingual direction.

METHODS

Sixty skeletal Class III patients were recruited. The alveolar bone width, buccal cortical bone thickness and lingual cortical bone thickness were measured in five planes from mesial to distal and at five depths from gingival to root. The effects of the gender of the patients, the second molar lingual inclination and the third molar on alveolar bone width and cortical bone thickness were evaluated. To explore the effect of third molar extraction on alveolar bone morphology, the measurements before and after third molar extraction were compared.

RESULTS

The impacted third molar had significantly greater alveolar bone width and thicker buccal cortical bone at the cervical third of the molar, while the erupted third molar had greater alveolar bone width at the apical third. Three weeks after third molar extraction, these advantages would weaken owing to the reconstruction of the alveolar bone. Patients with lingually inclined molar were observed to own thicker lingual cortical bone. Males tended to have greater alveolar bone width, but no significant differences were shown in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The growth of the third molar and the second molar lingual inclination affect the alveolar bone morphology of the mandibular second and third molars significantly, but gender has trivial effects on the morphology. The alveolar bone morphology of the mandibular second and third molars would change 3 weeks after third molar extraction.

More molar distal movement than pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography posterior space available at the root level in mandibular dentition distalization with microimplants

OBJECTIVES

To compare the mandibular posterior space available before treatment and the distance of molar distalization achieved after mandibular dentition distalization with microimplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 66 Class I or III adult patients (mean age = 24.46 ± 4.89 years) who underwent molar distalization using microimplants were retrospectively included. The posterior space available distal to the second molar before treatment and the distance of distalization achieved after treatment were measured using axial cone-beam computed tomography images (0, 2, 4, and 6 mm apical to the second molar root furcation). Changes in lingual cortical thickness and molar root length after treatment were examined. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare measurements before and after treatment. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between thinning of the cortical plate and root resorption.

RESULTS

Achieved distalization distance was significantly greater than pretreatment posterior space available by 0.8 mm at all root levels (P < .001). The difference was greater toward the root apex level and greater in the Class III group than the Class I group. Lingual cortical thickness was significantly decreased after treatment along with resorption of the second molar distal root (P < .001). In addition, a positive correlation was found between thinning of the cortical plate and distal root resorption of the molar (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieved distalization distance of the mandibular molar using microimplants was greater than the pretreatment posterior space available. Thinning of the lingual cortex and root resorption were observed after distalization.

The Three-Dimensional Investigation of the Radiographic Boundary of Mandibular Full-Arch Distalization in Different Facial Patterns

OBJECTIVE

Mandibular full-arch distalization (MFD) is a popular approach, particularly in non-extraction cases. However, we still cannot confirm whether facial patterns affect the amount of limits. This study aimed to determine the anatomical MFD limits in patients with different facial patterns.

STUDY DESIGN

Using computed tomography (CT), the shortest distances from the mandibular second molar to the inner cortex of the mandibular lingual surface and from the lower central incisor to the inner cortex of the lingual mandibular symphysis were measured in 60 samples (30 patients). The available distalization space in both regions was compared between groups with different facial patterns.

RESULTS

The available space in symphysis was more critical than that in retromolar area: the shortest distances to the inner cortex of the lingual mandibular symphysis at root levels 8 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction of the incisor were 1.28, 1.60, and 3.48 mm in the high-, normal-, and low-angle groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial patterns affected the MFD capacity, and the thickness of the lingual mandibular symphysis was the most critical anatomic limit encountered. Practitioners should always pay attention to the possible impacts from facial patterns, especially in the treatment of high-angle cases.

Comparison of the mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal types and eruption patterns of the mandibular third-molar: a cone-beam computed tomography study

BACKGROUND

The mandibular retromolar space (RMS) has not been extensively studied in relation to various sagittal skeletal classes and patterns of third-molar eruption. The objective of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the mandibular RMS among normodivergent subjects with different skeletal classes and patterns of mandibular third-molar eruption, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHOD

A total of 105 normodivergent patients (20-40 years) were included in this study. Participants were categorized into Class I, II and III groups based on ANB and further impacted and erupted groups based on the eruption patterns of the mandibular third molars. Measurements of the mandibular RMS were taken at four planes parallel to the occlusal plane, along the cusp line. Comparative analyses were conducted among the three sagittal groups and between the impacted and erupted groups.

RESULTS

The Class II group exhibited a statistically smaller RMS (P < 0.05). RMS was found to be larger in third-molar erupted group (P < 0.05). The rates of root contact and third-molar impaction was significantly higher in Class II group. (P < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The null hypothesis was rejected. Patients with Skeletal Class II tend to have a smaller mandibular RMS and a higher prevalence of root contact and third-molar impaction. The presence of impacted mandibular third molars was correlated with a shorter RMS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Boundary of mandibular molar distalization in orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To explore the mandibular retromolar space length (MRSL), initial root-inner cortex contact percentage (IRCCP), and the various factors that influence mandibular molar distalization. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and grey literature (Google Scholar and OpenGrey) for eligible cross-sectional observational studies measuring the MRSL and IRCCP in healthy adult patients. The risk of bias and evidence quality were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute's checklist and GRADE framework. Thirteen studies involving 1169 patients were included for qualitative synthesis. Seven of these studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the mean MRSL at the subfurcation-6 mm plane in Asian normodivergent cases was 3.78 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.81-4.35; I2 = 79.7%) for skeletal Class-I malocclusions, 3.02 mm (95% CI: 2.10-3.94; I2 = 62.5%) for Class-II, and 4.43 mm (95% CI: 3.14-5.73; I2 = 75.1%) for Class-III. The mean MRSL at the sub-cementoenamel junction (CEJ)-10 mm plane for Asian, Class-I, normodivergent cases was 3.28 mm (95% CI: 2.44-4.12; I2 = 68.9%). The mean IRCCP for Asian, Class-I, normodivergent cases was 27.2% (95% CI: 0.22-0.32; I2 = 0%). In Asian normodivergent cases, MRSL ranges from 3.28 to 4.43 mm with a 27.2% IRCCP for Class-I. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging is recommended for measuring the MRSL in the apex region particularly before molar distalization. Factors influencing MRSL and IRCCP include different races, skeletal patterns, facial types, and third-molar status.

Comparison of posttreatment stability after total mandibular arch distalization with mini-implants and mandibular setback surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare posttreatment stability in skeletal Class III patients between those treated by total mandibular arch distalization (TMAD) with buccal mini-implants and those by mandibular setback surgery (MSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The samples included 40 Class III adults, 20 treated by TMAD using buccal interradicular mini-implants and 20 treated with MSS. Lateral cephalograms were taken at pretreatment, posttreatment, and at least 1-year follow-up, and 24 variables were compared using statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Mandibular first molars moved distally 1.9 mm with intrusion of 1.1 mm after treatment in the TMAD group. The mandibular incisors moved distally by 2.3 mm. The MSS group exhibited a significant skeletal change of the mandible, whereas the TMAD group did not. During retention, there were no skeletal or dental changes other than 0.6 mm labial movement of the mandibular incisors (P < .05) in the MSS group. There was 1.4° of mesial tipping (P < .01) and 0.4 mm of mesial movement of the mandibular molars and 1.9° of labial tipping (P < .001) and 0.8 mm of mesial movement of the mandibular incisors in the TMAD group. These dental changes were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The TMAD group showed a slightly decreased overjet with labial tipping of the mandibular incisors and mesial tipping of the first molars during retention. Posttreatment stability of the mandibular dentition was not significantly different between the groups. It can be useful to plan camouflage treatment by TMAD with mini-implants in mild-to-moderate Class III patients.

Lower molar distalization using clear aligners: Is it effective? A systematic review

Distalization is one of the most useful movements in orthodontic treatments. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the effectiveness of lower molar distalization using clear aligner therapy (CAT). An electronic search was made from January 2012 to October 2022 using PubMed, Scopus, and LILACS databases without language limitations. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The search strategy resulted in 151 studies. A screening was performed to remove duplicates, and all the studies that did not respond to our questions for the title or abstract. Three studies underwent full text analysis. From the evaluation of the studies included in this review, it is possible to state that lower molar distalization is a clinical solution, but it is not a full bodily movement. CAT can provide more specifically a distal tipping movement. This is confirmed analyzing the discrepancy between expected movement and obtained movement. CAT can be considered a valid therapeutic option in patients with dental class III malocclusion, but it is obtained as a tipping movement instead of a body movement. Over-correction should be considered during the planning of the therapy.

Mandibular Posterior Anatomic Limit for Distalization in Patients With Various Patterns of Third Molar Impactions: A Three-Dimensional Cone Beam CT (CBCT) Study

AIM

The aim was to compare and evaluate the variation in the mandible's posterior anatomic limits (MPAL) stratified by different third molar impaction patterns utilizing cone-beam CT (CBCT) in individuals with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

METHODOLOGY

The sample consisted of CBCT records of 80 samples of Class III patients categorized based on the pattern of their third molar impaction. The shortest linear distances from the distal root of the second mandibular molar to the inner cortex of the mandibular body were measured at the crown level, at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and at the depths of 4, 6, and 8mm from the CEJ, all parallel to the posterior occlusal line. The MPAL of the four groups were compared. The Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was performed. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to compare the MPAL distances between the groups.

RESULTS

Significant differences were noted between the four groups at every level. MPAL distances decreased towards apex in all the groups and was least at the 8mm root level. The greatest MPAL distances were noted in the no-impaction group followed by the horizontal. At 8mm, the MPAL were 4.2+/-1.3 in Group 3 (Control), 3.3+/-0.9 in Group 1 and 2.7+/-0.05 mm in Group 2. Though the amount of space available for distalization was greatest for the mesioangular group at the crown level, it was least at the 8mm level compared to other groups.

CONCLUSION

MPAL distances were shortest at the root level in Class III patients who had mesioangularly impacted third molars and care should be taken before attempting distalization in them.

A 3-dimensional evaluation of available retromolar space for the application of ramal plates

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the available retromolar space for ramal plates in patients with Class I and III malocclusions and compare that space with and without third molars using cone-beam computed tomography.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography images of 30 patients (17 males, 13 females; mean age, 22.2 ± 4.5 years) with Class III malocclusion and 29 subjects (18 males, 11 females; mean age, 24.3 ± 3.7 years) with Class I malocclusion were analyzed. Available retromolar space at 4 axial levels of the second molar root and the volume of the retromolar bone were evaluated. Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (repeated measures analysis of covariance) was applied to compare the variables between Class I and III malocclusions and the presence of third molars.

RESULTS

Patients with Class I and III relationships showed up to 12.7 mm of available retromolar space at 2 mm apical from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). At 8 mm apical from CEJ, patients with Class III malocclusion had 11.1 mm of space, whereas those with a Class I relationship showed 9.8 mm of available space. When patients had third molars, the amount of available retromolar space was significantly greater in patients with a Class I and III relationship. However, patients with Class III malocclusion exhibited greater available retromolar space than those with a Class I relationship (P = 0.028). In addition, the bone volume was significantly greater in patients with Class III malocclusion than in patients with a Class I relationship and those with third molars than in those without them (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Class I and III groups showed the availability of at least 10.0 mm of retromolar space 2 mm apical to the CEJ for molar distalization. Based on this information, it is suggested that clinicians consider available retromolar space for molar distalization in diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with Class I and III malocclusion.

Three-Dimensional Assessment and Comparison of the Maxillary Tuberosity Between Skeletal and Dental Class I and Class II Adults in Maxillary Third Molar Agenesis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Human Study

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess and compare the dimensions (width (W), height (H), and length (L)) of the tuberosity distal to maxillary permanent second molar in individuals with skeletal and dental Class I and Class II malocclusions who had maxillary third molar agenesis.

METHODOLOGY

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the left (L) and right (R) anatomical tuberosity dimensions in three dimensions using the WillMaster software (HDX WILL Corporation, Korea). The measurements were compared between Class I (n = 35) and Class II (n = 35) normo-hypodivergent adult subjects. The dimensions were measured at regular 2 mm intervals from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and distovestibular root of the maxillary second molar in terms of the width (e.g., W1, W2, and W3), height (e.g., H1, H2, and H3), length (e.g., L1, L2, and L3) to the posterior limit of the tuberosity. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests, and intraclass correlation coefficient tests.

RESULTS

The width of the tuberosity at LW0, LW1, and LW2 was significantly higher in Class I compared to that in Class II. The right tuberosity in Class II showed significantly higher values in height at all reference points. The right tuberosity at RL0 and RL1 exhibited significantly higher values in the length of the Class II group compared to the Class I group.

CONCLUSIONS

The dimensions of the maxillary tuberosity (width, height, and length) varied between the Class I and Class II groups. Wider maxillary tuberosities were observed in the Class I group, while the Class II group had greater height and length dimensions of the tuberosity.

Evaluation of bone area in the posterior region for mandibular molar distalization in class I and class III patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the bone area in the posterior region, which is important for mandibular molar distalization in skeletal class I and class III individuals with normodivergent and hyperdivergent vertical growth patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 120 individuals divided into 4 groups as class I normodivergent (group-I), class I hyperdivergent (group-II), class III normodivergent (group-III), and class III hyperdivergent (group-IV). Retromolar area at crown level measurements was performed on CBCT-derived panoramic radiographs and axial sections. Retromolar area at the root level was measured 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm apical to cemento-enamel junction at CBCT axial sections.

RESULTS

Retromolar area decreased towards the root apex in all groups and smallest retromolar area was level of CEJ_10mm in all groups. At any root level, the distal root of the mandibular second molar tooth was in contact with the mandibular inner or outer lingual cortex; 50% in group-I, 46.7% in group-II, 23% in group-III, and 23% in group-IV.

CONCLUSIONS

In normodivergent individuals, the retromolar area length at the root level is observed to be higher in class III than in class I at almost every level. In hyperdivergent individuals, on the other hand, only at CEJ_10mm level, it is higher in length in class III than in class I. Vertical growth pattern has no effect on the root and crown level retromolar area in class I and class III individuals.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

CBCT provides more useful information than panoramic radiographs for patients who are scheduled for large mandibular molar distalization.

Three-dimensional analysis of the relationship between mandibular retromolar space and positional traits of third molars in non-hyperdivergent adults

BACKGROUND

The anatomical position of the mandibular third molars (M3s) is located in the distal-most portions of the molar area. In some previous literature, researchers evaluated the relationship between retromolar space (RS) and different classifications of M3 in three‑dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

Two hundred six M3s from 103 patients were included. M3s were grouped according to four classification criteria: PG-A/B/C, PG-I/II/III, mesiodistal angle and buccolingual angle. 3D hard tissue models were reconstructed by CBCT digital imaging. RS was measured respectively by utilizing the fitting WALA ridge plane (WP) which was fitted by the least square method and the occlusal plane (OP) as reference planes. SPSS (version 26) was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

In all criteria evaluated, RS decreased steadily from the crown to the root (P < 0.05), the minimum was at the root tip. From PG-A classification, PG-B classification to PG-C classification and from PG-I classification, PG-II classification to PG-III classification, RS both appeared a diminishing tendency (P < 0.05). As the degree of mesial tilt decreased, RS appeared an increasing trend (P < 0.05). RS in classification criteria of buccolingual angle had no statistical difference (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RS was associated with positional classifications of the M3. In the clinic, RS can be evaluated by watching the Pell&Gregory classification and mesial angle of M3.

Assessment of mandibular retromolar space in adults with regard to third molar eruption status

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the difference in length and width of the mandibular retromolar space (RMS) stratified by the different eruption and impaction statuses of the third molars in patients with skeletal Class I malocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The right mandibular RMS in 186 adult patients categorized according to the different statuses of the third molar was analyzed by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The shortest distances between the inner lingual cortex of the mandibular body and second molar root were measured parallel to the posterior occlusal line (POL) at depths of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm (mandibular retromolar space length in root level, RL_in2,4,6,8,10) on the axial slices with the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) as the reference level. The width of the RMS and second molar root was measured vertical to the POL at the terminal point of the molar distalization at depths of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm (width of the mandibular retromolar space, BW_2,4,6,8,10/ width of the second molar distal root, TW_2,4,6,8,10) from the CEJ.

RESULTS

RL in different measurement planes was 2.72 ± 2.22 ~ 3.74 ± 2.26 for Group A, 5.27 ± 1.68 ~ 9.10 ± 2.04 for Group B, 1.94 ± 2.34 ~ 5.71 ± 4.37 for Group C, 1.83 ± 2.95 ~ 5.05 ± 4.24 for Group D, and 5.93 ± 3.97 ~ 10.52 ± 2.16 for Group E. The BW measurement results for A ~ E group were 9.71 ± 1.41 ~ 10.51 ± 1.81, 9.83 ± 1.39 ~ 12.55 ± 2.11, 9.96 ± 1.21 ~ 12.17 ± 1.62, 9.82 ± 1.47 ~ 12.28 ± 2.77, and 10.02 ± 1.20 ~ 12.75 ± 0.82, respectively. There was no significant difference between men and women in any measurements (P > 0.05). Patients with normal third molars erupted and those vertically impacted possessed larger RMS lengths than those in which the third molars were missing, horizontally impacted or mesially impacted (P < 0.05). In each measurement plane, TW was significantly smaller than BW (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex had no effect on the length or width of the mandibular RMS. Different statuses of third molars can also differentially affect the mandibular RMS. The mandibular RMS width is not a limit for mandibular molar distalization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When considering the distalization of mandibular molars, more attention should be directed to the lingual cortex of the mandible, and CBCT scans are recommended for patients who require significant mandibular molar distalization. The mandible buccal shelf and retromolar area maybe a safe zone to insert the miniscrew for molar distalization.

Association of Mandibular Posterior Anatomic Limit with Skeletal Patterns and Root Morphology Using Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Comprehensive Analysis

This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the mandibular posterior anatomic limit (MPAL) and skeletal anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns, with consideration of factors that may be related. In total, 230 people were included: 49 Japanese, 122 Egyptian, and 59 Korean people. The MPAL was measured at 0, 2, 4, and 6 mm from the root furcation along the sagittal and cuspal lines at the distance from the distal root of the mandibular right second molar to the mandibular cortex of the lingual bone. Eight different MPALs were evaluated using multiple regression analysis with explanatory variables for anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns and qualitative variables for age, sex, population, the presence of third molars, number of roots, presence of C-shaped roots, and Angle malocclusion classification. The MPAL was significantly larger as the mandibular plane angle decreased. The MPAL near the root apex was significantly larger as the A-nasion-point B angle increased, and the MPAL near the root apex measured at the cuspal line was significantly larger for C-type roots. The present study showed that a C-shaped root affected the MPAL in addition to the anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns.

Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the mandibular retromolar space among normal-divergent adult patients with different sagittal skeletal patterns by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CBCTs of a total of 120 normal-divergent adult patients were investigated. Patients were categorized into the following three groups according to their ANB angle: skeletal Class I (48 patients), skeletal Class II (36 patients), and skeletal Class III (36 patients). Four different planes parallel to the mandibular occlusal plane were used to measure the retromolar space. The retromolar space was measured by two reference lines and then compared between different sagittal skeletal patterns groups. The incidence of root contact with the inner lingual cortex was compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

The retromolar space of the Class III patients was significantly larger than that of Class I patients and Class II patients. Compared with Class I and Class III patients, Class II patients had a smaller retromolar space and higher incidence of contact with the inner cortex of the mandible.

CONCLUSIONS

Class III patients had a larger retromolar space than Class I patients and Class II patients in four different planes. The mandibular retromolar space should be evaluated by CBCT in patients who need mandibular molar distalization.

Anatomical limitations and factors influencing molar distalization

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the anatomical limitations and characteristics of maxillary and mandibular retromolar regions affecting molar distalization using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 qualifying patients were classified into equal groups of skeletal Class II and Class III and stratified by vertical growth pattern, age, sex, and third molar presence. The available distance along the axis of distalization and cortical bone thickness (CBT) were measured in the maxillary and mandibular retromolar regions of Class II and Class III patients, respectively. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of the factors on the measured data.

RESULTS

The minimum available distance of the Class II maxilla was observed at a level 3 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), while that of the Class III mandible was at a level 9 mm from the CEJ. The average available distance at the limit level was 4.06 ± 1.93 mm in the Class II maxilla, and the average corresponding CBT was 1.00 mm. The average available distance at the limit level in the Class III mandible was 2.80 ± 1.96 mm, and the corresponding CBT was 2.24 mm. In both skeletal Class II and Class III patients, hyperdivergent groups had the least available distance for molar distalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The limit for available distance in the Class II maxilla is closer to the coronal level, while that of the Class III mandible is closer to the apical level. A hyperdivergent growth pattern in a patient is indicative of less potential for molar distalization. Axial slices of CBCT images provide valuable evaluation for molar distalization regarding limit levels.

Match of the Bimaxillary Basal Bone Arches and Its Variations among Individuals

INTRODUCTION

This study is aimed at illustrating the bimaxillary basal bone contours, to clarify the match of the basal bone arches of the upper and lower, especially the posterior segments, including the second molar and retromolar region.

METHODS

Based on 100 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images (50 males and 50 females), we obtained 100 pairs of basal bone arches, which were the horizontal inner cortex contours passing the furcation of the first molar paralleled to the lower occlusal plane. The Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) was applied to depict average contours and calculate the ratio and difference width of both upper and lower dental arches in different positions. Variations of the basal bone morphology among individuals were revealed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA).

RESULTS

The width discrepancy occurred at 7-7 segment (male: upper 65.62 mm and lower 68.81 mm and female: upper 62.98 mm and lower 68.38 mm) and the retromolar region (male: upper 64.67 mm and lower 71.96 mm and female: upper 62.34 mm and lower 71.44 mm). The ratio (p = 0.006) and difference value (p = 0.009) of 7-7 segment and the ratio of retromolar region (p = 0.044) differed in genders. Setting 2 mm overjet, the upper basal bone arch was wider than the lower by approximate 2 mm on both sides, except the second molar and retromolar region. According to PCA, the variation of basal bone arches appeared mainly at terminal segments.

CONCLUSIONS

For both male and female, the bimaxillary basal bone matched except terminal segments. Mismatch of female bimaxillary posterior basal bone was more pronounced than male. The basal bone arches of male were wider and longer than that of female.

Mandibular skeletal posterior anatomic limit for molar distalization in patients with Class III malocclusion with different vertical facial patterns

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the differences in mandibular posterior anatomic limit (MPAL) distances stratified by vertical patterns in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

CBCT images of 48 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion (mean age, 22.8 ± 3.1 years) categorized according to the vertical patterns (hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent; n = 16 per group) were analyzed. While parallel to the posterior occlusal line, the shortest linear distances from the distal root of the mandibular second molar to the inner cortex of the mandibular body were measured at depths of 4, 6, and 8 mm from the cementoenamel junction. MPAL distances were compared between the three groups, and their correlations were analyzed.

Results

The mean ages, sex distribution, asymmetry, and crowding in the three groups showed no significant differences. MPAL distance was significantly longer in male (3.8 ± 2.6 mm) than in female (1.8 ± 1.2 mm) at the 8-mm root level. At all root levels, MPAL distances were significantly different in the hypodivergent and hyperdivergent groups (p < 0.001) and between the normodivergent and hyperdivergent groups (p < 0.01). MPAL distances were the shortest in the hyperdivergent group. The mandibular plane angle highly correlated with MPAL distances at all root levels (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

MPAL distances were the shortest in patients with hyperdivergent patterns and showed a decreasing tendency as the mandibular plane angle increased. MPAL distances were significantly shorter (~3.16 mm) at the 8-mm root level.

Does the Retromolar Area Provide Adequate Space for an Oral Endotracheal Tube Without Interfering With Intermaxillary Fixation?

PURPOSE

Traumatic maxillofacial injuries requiring intermaxillary fixation (IMF) traditionally necessitate airway management via tracheostomy or submental intubation. The aim of this study is to understand whether the retromolar space can accommodate passage of a reinforced endotracheal tube (ETT) without interfering with establishing IMF, a technique previously described as retromolar intubation.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was created including previously treated facial trauma patients by our department as the study sample. From this group, 3D reconstructed scans were created and used to estimate that dimensions of the retromolar space. The averages of these dimensions were calculated and compared to the area occupied by different sized reinforced ETTs (6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0). A 1-sample t-test was used to compare the retromolar areas to each ETT size for all patients and by gender.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients, ages 19-69 years old, treated from July 2010 to November 2018 were included in this study. This included 24 males (21-69yo) and 17 females (19-60yo), with a total of 80 characteristics measured. The retromolar areas calculated were statistically bigger than the reinforced ETT sizes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 compared to the average retromolar space area, but not statistically significant for reinforced oral ETT sizes 7.5 and 8.0.

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest the use of 6.0, 6.5 and 7.0 reinforced ETTs can be positioned in the retromolar space, allowing the surgeon to place a patient in IMF without occlusal interference. This technique could provide an alternative option to submental intubation or tracheostomy.

Quantitative evaluation of retromolar space in adults with different vertical facial types

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences in mandibular retromolar space among skeletal Class I subjects with different vertical divergence using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 123 skeletal Class I patients (aged 20-40 years) were categorized into hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent groups based on S-N/Go-Me and facial height index (FHI). Mandibular retromolar space was measured at four planes parallel to the occlusal plane along the sagittal line and molar cuspal line, respectively. The mandibular retromolar space was compared among the three vertical groups.

RESULTS

The hyperdivergent group had a significantly smaller mandibular retromolar space compared with the other two groups, while the hypodivergent group had the largest retromolar space. In addition, the hyperdivergent group had a larger number of subjects whose roots contacted the lingual cortex of the mandibular body.

CONCLUSIONS

The hyperdivergent group tends to exhibit the smallest mandibular retromolar space and highest risk of cortex contact. Clinicians should keep in mind that successful molar distalization requires sufficient retromolar space, especially for hyperdivergent subjects, which should be verified with CBCT.