Increased persistency in medication use by U.S. Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes is associated with lower hospitalization rates and cost savings

A systematic review and meta-analysis on impact of suboptimal use of antidepressants, bisphosphonates, and statins on healthcare resource utilisation and healthcare cost

BACKGROUND

Depression, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease impose a heavy economic burden on society. Understanding economic impacts of suboptimal use of medication due to nonadherence and non-persistence (non-MAP) for these conditions is important for clinical practice and health policy-making.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic literature review aims to assess the impact of non-MAP to antidepressants, bisphosphonates and statins on healthcare resource utilisation and healthcare cost (HRUHC), and to assess how these impacts differ across medication classes.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and an aggregate meta-analysis were performed. Using the search protocol developed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, JSTOR and EconLit were searched for articles that explored the relationship between non-MAP and HRUHC (i.e., use of hospital, visit to healthcare service providers other than hospital, and healthcare cost components including medical cost and pharmacy cost) published from November 2004 to April 2021. Inverse-variance meta-analysis was used to assess the relationship between non-MAP and HRUHC when reported for at least two different populations.

RESULTS

Screening 1,123 articles left 10, seven and 13 articles on antidepressants, bisphosphonates, and statins, respectively. Of those, 27 were rated of good quality, three fair and none poor using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. In general, non-MAP was positively associated with HRUHC for all three medication classes and most prominently for bisphosphonates, although the relationships differed across HRUHC components and medication classes. The meta-analysis found that non-MAP was associated with increased hospital cost (26%, p = 0.02), outpatient cost (10%, p = 0.01), and total medical cost excluding pharmacy cost (12%, p<0.00001) for antidepressants, and increased total healthcare cost (3%, p = 0.07) for bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic literature review is the first to compare the impact of non-MAP on HRUHC across medications for three prevalent conditions, depression, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Positive relationships between non-MAP and HRUHC highlight inefficiencies within the healthcare system related to non-MAP, suggesting a need to reduce non-MAP in a cost-effective way.

Treatment persistence in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in clinical practice in Sweden

AIM

To compare treatment persistence in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) dulaglutide, exenatide once-weekly (QW), liraglutide or lixisenatide in routine clinical practice in Sweden and assess clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study using data from several nationwide Swedish health registries, including the National Diabetes Register and other mandatory and population-based registries. Individual level data were collected from 17 361 patients who initiated GLP-1 RA treatment from 23 May 2015 to 15 October 2017, up to 2.5 years postindex (treatment start date). Treatment persistence and modification, predictors of discontinuation, HbA1c and body weight were recorded. Non-persistence was defined as a treatment gap of more than 45 days. Treatment modification included switching and augmentation. Confounding was addressed through the use of propensity scores.

RESULTS

Treatment persistence was higher and treatment modifications were lower in patients initiating dulaglutide compared with those on exenatide QW, liraglutide and lixisenatide. Patients who remained on the same treatment for 1-year postindex experienced greater HbA1c reductions and a steadier decrease in body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that in clinical practice in Sweden there is a greater persistence of treatment among patients initiating dulaglutide compared with those on exenatide QW, liraglutide and lixisenatide. Persistence with the index GLP-1 RA was closely correlated with positive clinical outcomes and thus should be considered a critical factor of patient-centric treatment in Sweden.

Further improvement in glycemic control after switching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide once-weekly autoinjected suspension in patients with type 2 diabetes: 52-week results from the DURATION-NEO-1 study

INTRODUCTION

Investigate the effects of switching from two times per day exenatide to once-weekly exenatide administered by autoinjector (exenatide once-weekly suspension by autoinjector (QWS-AI)) or treatment with exenatide QWS-AI for 1 year.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this phase III open-label study, adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive exenatide QWS-AI (2 mg) or exenatide two times per day (5 mcg for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mcg) for 28 weeks. During a subsequent non-randomized 24-week extension, patients who received exenatide two times per day were switched to exenatide QWS-AI and those randomized to exenatide QWS-AI continued this treatment. Efficacy measures included changes from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (A1C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body weight.

RESULTS

In total, 315 patients (mean baseline A1C of 8.5%) completed the initial 28 weeks of randomized treatment with exenatide QWS-AI (n=197) or exenatide two times per day (n=118) and were included in the 24-week extension (mean A1C of 7.0% and 7.3%, respectively, at week 28). From weeks 28-52, patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI had additional A1C reductions of approximately 0.5% (mean A1C change from baseline of -1.4% at week 52) and further reductions from baseline in FPG. Patients who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks showed clinically relevant A1C reductions (mean A1C change from baseline of -1.3% at week 52). Body-weight reductions achieved through week 28 were sustained at week 52 in both groups. There were no unexpected safety concerns or changes in the safety profile among patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI or those who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI resulted in further A1C reductions and maintenance of earlier decreases in body weight, while continued therapy with exenatide QWS-AI for 52 weeks maintained A1C and body-weight reductions, without additional safety or tolerability concerns.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01652716.

Economic cost of diabetes in the Eastern Mediterranean region countries: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non communicable diseases including diabetes imposes substantial financial burden on households, societies and nations in both developed and developing countries. However, there is no information on the extent of diabetes expenditure in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO). Therefore, this study aimed to identify the treatment costs of diabetes in this area. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on treatment expenditures of diabetes in EMRO countries.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCES databases to find out published manuscripts on treatment cost of diabetes. Information was extracted using data extraction sheets and then the data were imported into STATA software version.11. Mean annual treatment cost of diabetes per patient, annual treatment costs of diabetes per patient by Diabetes Mellitus (DM) complications and finally, cost of chronic diabetes complications per patient were pooled and reported.

RESULTS

After reviewing title, abstract and the full text of identified articles; a total of seven studies were reported appropriate data for this meta-analysis. The pooled annual treatment cost per diabetes patient for EMRO countries was 1150 US$ (95% CI: 595-2221) which was 3358 US$ (95% CI: 2200-5124) in EMRO countries except of Iran compared to 255 US$ (92-708) in Iran. The treatment cost of diabetes was higher in males, insulin-used and in the patient with family history of diabetes. The cost of diabetes was significantly increased with the duration of diabetes (P = 0.001) as well. According to the results, the largest share of costs is related to medication costs. Finally, the pooled average annual treatment cost per patient by diabetes mellitus complications was varied from 2828 US$ in the patients that have cerebrovascular disease complication to 7261 US$ in the patients with Stroke complication.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the annual treatment cost of diabetes is varied within EMRO countries. Qatar and Iran have spent the highest and lowest cost for diabetes, respectively. This may be due to the large socioeconomic differences between countries and special conditions of them such as currency value in the region.

Factors Related to Medication Self-Management in African American Older Women

Individuals with multiple chronic diseases are often prescribed medications for each condition and thus must manage a drug regimen. Medication self-management is challenging for most individuals with chronic diseases, but it can be especially difficult for African American older women. This study investigated how medical mistrust, caregiver role strain, and other relevant variables may be associated with medication self-management behaviors (MSMB) among African American older women, and whether goal congruence and self-efficacy mediated the relationship between the predictor variables and MSMB. A sample of 116 African American older (age >50 years) women from central Milwaukee participated in this correlational, cross-sectional study. Although goal congruence and self-efficacy were not found to act as mediators, the main finding was that goal congruence, self-efficacy, and age predicted 30% of the variance in MSMB. The results suggest that it is essential to strengthen individual self-efficacy, determine the goals that individuals have for their medication regimen, and develop support mechanisms to help patients attain these goals to better manage chronic disease. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2019; 12(2):71-79.].

GLP-1 RA Treatment and Dosing Patterns Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Six Countries: A Retrospective Analysis of Pharmacy Claims Data

INTRODUCTION

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) class is evolving and expanding. This retrospective database study evaluated recent real-world treatment and dosing patterns of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating GLP-1 RAs in Belgium (BE), France (FR), Germany (DE), Italy (IT), the Netherlands (NL), and Canada (CA).

METHODS

Adult T2D patients initiating GLP-1 RA therapy (dulaglutide [DULA], exenatide twice daily [exBID], exenatide once weekly [exQW], liraglutide [LIRA], or lixisenatide [LIXI]) from 2015 to 2016 were identified using the IQVIA (IQVIA, Durham, NC, and Danbury, CT, USA) Real-World Data Adjudicated Pharmacy Claims. The therapy initiation date was termed the 'index date.' Eligible patients had ≥ 180 days pre-index and ≥ 360 days post-index. Persistence (until discontinuation or switch) was evaluated over the variable follow-up using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. Average daily dose (ADD) was calculated until discontinuation or switch.

RESULTS

A total of 34,649 DULA, 3616 exBID, 11,138 exQW, 48,317 LIRA, and 2,204 LIXI patients were included in the analysis (34.9-63.2% female; median age range 53-62 years; median follow-up 16-30 months). Proportion persistent at 1-year post-index was 36.8-67.2% for DULA, 5.9-44.4% for exBID, 24.7-44.2% for exQW, 22.2-57.5% for LIRA, and 15.5-40.0% for LIXI. Median time persistent (days) was 245-381 for DULA, 62-243 for exBID, 121-319 for exQW, 103-507 for LIRA, and 99-203 for LIXI. Mean ADD was 13.21-20.43 µg for exBID, 1.44-1.68 mg for LIRA, and 19.88-20.54 µg for LIXI. Mean average weekly dose (AWD) ranged from 2.03 to 2.14 mg for exQW. Mean AWD for DULA was 1.25 mg in Canada and ranged from 1.43 to 1.53 mg in the other countries.

CONCLUSION

Across six countries, persistence was highest among DULA patients and generally lowest among exBID patients. ADD/AWD for all GLP-1 RAs was in line with the recommended label. Longer-term data would be useful to obtain a better understanding of GLP-1 RA treatment patterns over time.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Utilization patterns of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective database analysis complements previous research to understand treatment patterns for German patients newly-initiating or switching to subsequent GLP-1 RAs.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years) initiating GLP-1 RA (Cohort 1 [C1]) or switching from a previous GLP-1 RA (Cohort 2 [C2]) to exenatide twice-daily (exBID), exenatide once-weekly (exQW), dulaglutide (DULA), or liraglutide (LIRA) were included in this analysis using IQVIA LRx from January 1, 2014-March 31, 2017. Patients were required to have ≥1 oral anti-hyperglycemic prescription during the 6-month pre-index period and ≥12 months follow-up. Persistence and treatment modifications were assessed within and beyond 12 months follow-up. Average daily/weekly dosage (ADD/AWD) was calculated during persistence.

RESULTS

C1 included 13,417 patients, while C2 included 4,264 patients. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was similar (57.7 ± 11.1 years [C1], 58.9 ± 10.1 years [C2]). Most patients using DULA in C2 had switched from LIRA (56.6%). For C1, mean ADD for LIRA was 1.41 ± 0.10 mg, slightly higher in C2, and increased over time. ADD for exBID was 16.9 ± 1.0 mcg, slightly greater in C2. AWD was 2.00 ± 0.05 mg for exQW users and 1.42 ± 0.03 mg for DULA users in C1, similar to C2. For C1, 27.0% exBID, 35.3% exQW, 50.9% DULA, and 48.1% LIRA users remained persistent at 12 months. Patients using DULA had a higher probability of remaining persistent over time (Kaplan-Meier) for both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients using DULA had the highest probability of remaining persistent over time, followed by LIRA. ADD/AWD for DULA, exQW, and exBID were aligned with the recommended combination therapy dose; LIRA ADD suggests some patients use the 1.8 mg dose.

Factors Contributing to Increases in Diabetes-Related Preventable Hospitalization Costs Among U.S. Adults During 2001-2014

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in diabetes-related preventable hospitalization costs and to determine the contribution of each underlying factor to these changes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used data from the 2001-2014 U.S. National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) for adults (≥18 years old) to estimate the trends in hospitalization costs (2014 USD) in total and by condition (short-term complications, long-term complications, uncontrolled diabetes, and lower-extremity amputation). Using regression and growth models, we estimated the relative contribution of following underlying factors: total number of hospitalizations, rate of hospitalization, the number of people with diabetes, mean cost per admission, length of stay, and cost per day.

RESULTS

During 2001-2014, the estimated total cost of diabetes-related preventable hospitalizations increased annually by 1.6% (92.9 million USD; P < 0.001). Of this 1.6% increase, 75% (1.2%) was due to the increase in the number of hospitalizations, which is a result of a 3.8% increase in diabetes population and a 2.6% decrease in the hospitalization rate, and 25% (0.4%) was due to the increase in cost per admission, for a net result of a 1.6% increase in cost per day and a 1.3% decline in mean length of stay. By component, the cost of short-term complications, lower-extremity amputations, and long-term complications increased annually by 4.2, 1.9, and 1.5%, respectively, while the cost of uncontrolled diabetes declined annually by 2.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The total cost of diabetes-related preventable hospitalizations had been increasing during 2001-2014, mainly resulting from increases in number of people with diabetes and cost per hospitalization day. The underlying factors identified in our study could lead to efforts that may lower future hospitalization costs.

Utilization Patterns of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Italy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Real-world evidence on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RAs) usage is emerging in different European countries but is lacking in Italy. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe the real-world drug utilization patterns in patients initiating GLP-1 RAs for treating T2DM in Italy.

METHODS

Adults aged ≥ 20 years and with ≥ 1 oral antidiabetic drug (alone or in combination with insulin) other than GLP-1 RAs in the 6 months prior to initiating exenatide twice daily (exBID), exenatide once weekly (exQW), dulaglutide once weekly (DULA), liraglutide once daily (LIRA) or lixisenatide once daily (LIXI) between March and July 2016 were retrospectively identified in the Italian IMS LifeLink™ longitudinal prescriptions database (retail pharmacy data). Patients with ≥ 6-month follow-up (defined as evidence of any prescription activity) were included. Proportions of patients who remained persistent (continued treatment until discontinuation/switch) in the first 6 months and of those who discontinued or switched to a different GLP-1 RA over the entire follow-up were recorded. For each treatment, the average daily/weekly dosage (ADD/AWD) while persistent during the available follow-up was calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 7319 patients: 92 exBID, 970 exQW, 3368 DULA, 2573 LIRA and 316 LIXI. Across treatments, 89% patients were ≥ 50 years old, 54% were males, and the median follow-up duration ranged between 8.1 and 8.7 months. At 6 months, 35% exBID, 47% exQW, 62% DULA, 50% LIRA and 40% LIXI patients remained persistent. Over the entire follow-up, median persistence days varied from 73 (exBID) to > 300 days (DULA). The mean ± SD ADD/AWD was exBID: 17.7 ± 2.1 µg/day; exQW: 2.1 ± 0.1 mg/week; DULA: 1.5 ± 0.2 mg/week; LIRA: 1.5 ± 0.2 mg/day; LIXI: 21.0 ± 5.5 µg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis suggests differences exist in persistence between patients treated with various GLP-1 RAs. Among the investigated treatments, patients prescribed exBID recorded the lowest and those prescribed DULA the highest persistence with therapy.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN, USA.

A Class Comparison of Medication Persistence in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Longer medication persistence in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with improved glycaemic control. It is not clear which oral therapies have the best persistence. The objective of this study was to compare medication persistence across different oral therapies in people with T2D.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using a primary-care-based population, the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre cohort. We identified new prescriptions for oral diabetes medication in people with type 2 diabetes between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2015. We compared median persistence across each class. We also compared non-persistence (defined as a prescription gap of ≥ 90 days) between classes, adjusting for confounders, using Cox regression. Confounders included: age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, alcohol use, smoking status, glycaemic control, diabetes duration, diabetes complications, comorbidities, and number of previous and concurrent diabetes medications.

RESULTS

We identified 60,327 adults with T2D. The majority 42,810 (70.9%) of those had one or more oral medications prescribed; we measured persistence in those patients (who were prescribed 55,728 oral medications in total). Metformin had the longest median persistence (3.04 years; 95% CI 2.94-3.12). The adjusted hazard ratios for non-persistence compared with metformin were: sulfonylureas HR 1.20 (1.16-1.24), DPP-4 inhibitors HR 1.43 (1.38-1.49), thiazolidinediones HR 1.71 (95% CI 1.64-1.77), SGLT2 inhibitors HR 1.04 (0.93-1.17), meglitinides HR 2.25 (1.97-2.58), and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors HR 2.45 (1.98-3.02). The analysis of SGLT2 inhibitors was limited by the short duration of follow-up for this new class. Other factors associated with reduced medication persistence were female gender, younger age, and non-white ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence is strongly influenced by medication class and should be considered when initiating treatments.

Practical Considerations for the Use of Subcutaneous Treatment in the Management of Dyslipidaemia

Suboptimal drug adherence represents a major challenge to effective primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. While adherence is influenced by multiple considerations, polypharmacy and dosing frequency appear to be rate-limiting factors in patient satisfaction and subsequent adherence. The cardiovascular and metabolic therapeutic areas have recently benefited from a number of advances in drug therapy, in particular protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and incretin-based therapies, respectively. These drugs are administered subcutaneously and offer efficacious treatment options with reduced dosing frequency. Whilst patients with diabetes and diabetologists are well initiated to injectable therapies, the cardiovascular therapeutic arena has traditionally been dominated by oral agents. It is therefore important to examine the practical aspects of treating patients with these new lipid-lowering agents, to ensure they are optimally deployed in everyday clinical practice.

Diabetes medication persistence, different medications have different persistence rates

AIM

To assess the persistence of diabetic patients to oral medications.

METHODS

The study included all type 2 diabetic patients over 40 years, members of one District of Clalit Health Services Israel, who were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus before 2008 and who filled at least one prescription per year during 2008-2010, for the following medications: metformin, glibenclamide, acarbose, statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs). Purchase of at least 9 monthly prescriptions during 2009 was considered "good medication persistence". We compared HbA1c and LDL levels, according to medication persistence, for each medication; and cross persistence rates between medications.

RESULTS

21,357 patients were included. Average age was 67.0±11.0years, 48.9% were men, and 35.8% were from low SES. Good medication persistence rates for ARBs were 78.8%, ACEI 69.0%, statins 66.6%, acarbose 67.8%, metformin 58.6%, and glibenclamide 55.3%. Good persistence to any of the medications tested was associated with a higher rate of good persistence to other medications. Patients who took more medications had better persistence rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Different oral medications used by diabetic patients have different persistence rates. Good persistence for any one medication is an indicator of good persistence to other medications. Investment in enhancing medication persistence in persons with diabetes may improve persistence to other medications, as well as improve glycemic control.

Missed doses of oral antihyperglycemic medications in US adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: prevalence and self-reported reasons

BACKGROUND

Adherence to antihyperglycemic medication is thought to be suboptimal, but the proportion of patients missing doses, the number of doses missed, and reasons for missing are not well described. This survey was conducted to estimate the prevalence of and reasons for missed doses of oral antihyperglycemic medications among US adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to explore associations between missed doses and health outcomes.

METHODS

The study was a cross-sectional patient survey. Respondents were contacted via a commercial survey panel and completed an on-line questionnaire via the Internet. Respondents provided information about their use of oral antihyperglycemic medications including doses missed in the prior 4 weeks, personal characteristics, and health outcomes. Weights were calculated to project the prevalence to the US adult population with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Outcomes were compared according to number of doses missed in the past 4 weeks using bivariate statistics and generalized linear models.

RESULTS

Approximately 30% of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus reported missing or reducing ≥1 dose of oral antihyperglycemic medication in the prior 4 weeks. Accidental missing was more commonly reported than purposeful skipping, with forgetting the most commonly reported reason. The timing of missed doses suggested respondents had also forgotten about doses missed, so the prevalence of missed doses is likely higher than reported. Outcomes were poorer among those who reported missing three or more doses in the prior 4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of US adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus miss doses of their oral antihyperglycemic medications.

Self-reported Barriers to Adherence and Persistence to Treatment With Injectable Medications for Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE

This study explored the barriers that adult Americans experience when taking injectable medications for type 2 diabetes, from the time of filling the initial prescription through the decision to discontinue the medication.

METHODS

An Internet-based survey was conducted in 2 waves among adult patients (N = 2000) who had received a physician prescription for insulin, liraglutide, or exenatide once weekly (QW), regardless of whether the prescription was filled by a pharmacy. In wave 1, patients were surveyed on their medication history and experience and, if relevant, the medication discontinuation process. Those still taking their injectable medication at the time of wave 1 were contacted 6 months later (wave 2, n = 585) to assess any changes in their medication experience.

FINDINGS

Among patients who delayed filling their prescription by ≥1 week, cost was a common reason for delay for refilling of liraglutide (63%) and exenatide QW (49%). The most commonly reported barrier to maintaining injectable medication was injection concerns (42%) such as aversion to needles, pain, or needle size. Lack of perceived need was the most common reason for discontinuation for basal (47%) and prandial/premixed (44%) insulin. For liraglutide, the most common reason for discontinuation was experiencing an adverse event (33%); for exenatide QW, it was injection concerns (38%).

IMPLICATIONS

The diverse barriers we identified underscore the need for better patient-prescriber communication to ensure that newly prescribed injectable medications are consistent with a patient's ability or willingness to manage them, to appropriately set expectations about medications, and to address new barriers that arise during the course of treatment.

The impact of initial antidiabetic agent and use of monitoring agents on prescription costs in newly treated type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort analysis

AIMS

To measure the costs associated with the use of antidiabetic agents, monitoring materials and cardiovascular disease (CVD) agents in the management of newly treated type 2 diabetes, and to investigate the factors associated with these costs.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Irish national pharmacy claims database. Newly treated patients were identified for 2012 and followed for one year post treatment initiation. Factors associated with costs were assessed using a generalised linear model with gamma family and log-link function. Cost ratios (CR) and 95% CIs were used to determine the contributors of prescription costs. Adjusted odd ratios (OR) and 95% CIs were used to investigate factors associated with high frequency self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).

RESULTS

Mean prescription costs for the 12,941 subjects was €871, while total costs were €11 million. CVD agents accounted for 58% of total costs; 22% of costs were for SMBG; antidiabetic agents accounted for 17% of costs. SMBG resulted in costs that were 80% higher than those without, CR 1.80 (95% CI 1.76-1.84). No significant differences were observed between initiation on metformin or sulphonylureas and high frequency SMBG (OR 1.01 95% CI 0.97-1.04 vs reference). Initiation on newer antidiabetic agents was a significant positive predictors of prescription costs (CR 2.36 95% CI 2.21-2.51 vs metformin).

CONCLUSIONS

Type of initial antidiabetic agent, and SMBG were significant predictors of prescription costs. SMBG represent a major proportion of total costs; however, its use in combination with antidiabetic agents that do not cause hypoglycaemia is questionable.

Treatment adherence in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: patient characteristics and long-term impact of adherence on inpatient care utilization

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of antidiabetic medication adherence on hospital utilization in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). This study specifically analyzed patients with newly diagnosed T2D with the intent of lessening intragroup disease severity differences, and adjusting for a range of other clinical and demographic characteristics.

METHODS

This retrospective US claims database study evaluated adults with newly diagnosed T2D who started antidiabetic medications in 2005-2009, had ≥ 2 antidiabetic medication claims after their first (baseline). Medication adherence was evaluated using the medication possession ratio (MPR) of any or all antidiabetic medication(s) during the 3-year post-baseline period. Repeated-measures analyses examined changes in inpatient utilization from the pre- to post-baseline period. The impact of adherence on hospital utilization during the post-baseline period was evaluated with a logistic regression model to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS

The study included 192,717 patients (mean age, 55.0 years). Mean MPR for antidiabetic therapy was 0.74. MPR was highest in elderly patients and Medicare beneficiaries. Mean annualized inpatient admissions during the 3-year post-baseline period were significantly lower in patients with MPR ≥ 0.80 (1.4) than in those with MPR < 0.80 (2.2; P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis, adjusting for patient characteristics and prior inpatient utilization, showed 39% lower odds of hospitalization (OR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.534-0.693) for patients with MPR ≥ 0.80. People with T2D-related complications or hospitalization had approximately 2- to 3-fold higher risk of subsequent hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In newly diagnosed T2D patients with antidiabetic therapy in the first three ensuing years, higher antidiabetic medication adherence was significantly associated with lower hospital inpatient utilization before and after adjusting for patient characteristics.

Medication Adherence With Diabetes Medication: A Systematic Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence regarding risk factors associated with nonadherence to prescribed glucose-lowering agents, the impact of nonadherence on glycemic control and the economics of diabetes care, and the interventions designed to improve adherence.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaborative, BIOSIS, and the Health and Psychosocial Instruments databases were searched for studies of medication adherence for the period from May 2007 to December 2014. Inclusion criteria were study design and primary outcome measuring or characterizing adherence. Published evidence was graded according to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six published articles were reviewed; 98 met inclusion criteria. Factors including age, race, health beliefs, medication cost, co-pays, Medicare Part D coverage gap, insulin use, health literacy, primary nonadherence, and early nonpersistence significantly affect adherence. Higher adherence was associated with improved glycemic control, fewer emergency department visits, decreased hospitalizations, and lower medical costs. Adherence was lower when medications were not tolerated or were taken more than twice daily, with concomitant depression, and with skepticism about the importance of medication. Intervention trials show the use of phone interventions, integrative health coaching, case managers, pharmacists, education, and point-of-care testing improve adherence.

CONCLUSION

Medication adherence remains an important consideration in diabetes care. Health professionals working with individuals with diabetes (eg, diabetes educators) are in a key position to assess risks for nonadherence, to develop strategies to facilitate medication taking, and to provide ongoing support and assessment of adherence at each visit.

Food insecurity and medication adherence in low-income older Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes

Little is known about diabetes management among low-income older Americans. This study used statewide self-administered survey and Medicare claims data to examine the relationships of food insecurity and medication (re)fill adherence in a sample of Medicare Part D beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes in need of food assistance in Georgia in 2008 (n = 243, mean age 74.2 ± 7.8 years, 27.2% African American, 77.4% female). (Re)fill adherence to oral hypoglycemics was measured as Proportion of Days Covered. Food insecurity was assessed using a six-item validated standard measure. About 54% of the sample were food insecure. About 28% of the diabetic sample did not (re)fill any diabetes medication and over 80% had at least one diabetes complication. Food insecure participants showed comparable (re)fill adherence to food secure participants. However, 57% of food insecure participants were nonadherent to oral hypoglycemics. Underlying basic needs must be addressed to improve diabetes management in this population.

Adherence to Insulin Pen Therapy Is Associated with Reduction in Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder that poses a significant economic burden on the US healthcare system associated with direct and indirect medical costs, loss of productivity, and premature mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether increased adherence to therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes who use an insulin pen is associated with reduced healthcare costs, and to describe the overall healthcare costs of patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective claims database analysis used the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases to identify patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes with at least 1 insulin pen prescription claim between January 2006 and September 2010. Insulin pen adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR). The cost outcomes included all-cause and type 2 diabetes-related costs by type of service (ie, inpatient, outpatient medical, outpatient pharmacy), which were calculated in 2011 US dollars. Insulin adherence and overall healthcare costs were evaluated over the 12-month postindex period.

RESULTS

A total of 32,361 patients met the study inclusion criteria, with an average MPR of 0.63 (standard deviation [SD], 0.29). Overall, patients with type 2 diabetes who used an insulin pen had an average annual healthcare cost of $19,612, which was driven by inpatient costs (37.2%) and outpatient pharmacy costs (24.4%). There is a significant difference in the average annual per-patient healthcare expenditures between the least adherent group (MPR <0.20; 11.0% of patients) and the most adherent group (MPR >0.80; 34.6% of patients) $26,310 versus $23,839, respectively (P = .007). Patients with the greatest insulin adherence had higher overall pharmacy costs than patients with the lowest insulin adherence ($10,174 vs $5395, respectively; P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The total healthcare expenditures of patients with type 2 diabetes who utilized insulin pens decreased with improvement in adherence, suggesting that higher rates of medication adherence may present an opportunity to curb healthcare costs in insulin pen users. The average sample MPR for our study population was 0.63 (SD, 0.29), indicating that insulin adherence continues to be a challenge for successful diabetes management. More research is needed to better characterize the relationship between medication adherence and healthcare costs among insulin users with type 2 diabetes and to identify the key drivers of adherence among this patient group.

Impact of medication adherence and persistence on clinical and economic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Adherence to diabetes medication has been linked to improved glycemic levels and lower costs, but previous research on adherence has typically involved oral antidiabetic medication or insulin. This study examines how adherence and persistence to once-daily liraglutide impact glycemic control and economic outcomes in a real-world population of adult type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from July 2009 through September 2013. Patients aged ≥18 years with T2D treated with liraglutide were identified (index date = first liraglutide prescription). Adherence was based on the proportion of days covered (PDC); with PDC ≥0.80 classified as adherent. Non-persistent patients were those with a gap in therapy of >90 days. Lab results for glycated hemoglobin (A1C) were used to identify whether patients achieved target levels of <7.0% and ≤ 6.5%, or experienced a reduction of ≥1.0% in A1C from pre-index (baseline) to post-index (follow-up). Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of achieving the A1C goals, adjusted for baseline characteristics. Diabetes-related medical, pharmacy, and total costs were modeled and estimated for the adherence and persistence cohorts.

Results

A total of 1321 patients were identified. The mean PDC was 0.59 and 34% of patients were classified as adherent, while 60% were persistent over 12 months of follow-up. Adherent and persistent patients were more likely to achieve each of the A1C goals than their non-adherent and non-persistent counterparts after adjusting for patient characteristics. Adherence and persistence were associated with higher adjusted diabetes-related pharmacy and total healthcare costs during follow-up; whereas persistent patients had significantly lower diabetes-related medical costs than non-persistent patients.

Conclusions

Adherence and persistence to liraglutide are associated with improved A1C outcomes. Persistent patients showed significantly lower medical costs versus those discontinuing liraglutide. Total healthcare costs were higher for adherent and persistent cohorts driven by higher pharmacy costs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0199-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effects of Medicare Part D on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Hospital Utilization Among Seniors

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether Medicare Part D reduced racial/ethnic disparities in hospital utilization among Medicare seniors, based on the Institute of Medicine's definition of a disparity.

METHOD

Using data on 43,098 adult respondents to the 2002-2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we derive a difference-in-difference-in-differences estimator using a multivariate regression framework, and measure Part D's effects on disparities in any hospitalization, the number of nights hospitalized, and inpatient expenses.

RESULTS

Part D narrowed racial/ethnic disparities in hospital utilization. For African Americans, it reduced the disparity in any hospitalization by 2.94% (p < .001) but had no effect on disparities in nights hospitalized or inpatient expenses. For Hispanics, Part D reduced disparities in nights hospitalized by 1.58 nights (p = .009) and in inpatient expenses by US$3,453 (p < .001).

DISCUSSION

Following Medicare Part D, disparities in hospital utilization narrowed significantly for both African American and Hispanic seniors, but in different ways for each population.

Randomized trial of telephone outreach to improve medication adherence and metabolic control in adults with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Medication nonadherence is a major obstacle to better control of glucose, blood pressure (BP), and LDL cholesterol in adults with diabetes. Inexpensive effective strategies to increase medication adherence are needed.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a pragmatic randomized trial, we randomly assigned 2,378 adults with diabetes mellitus who had recently been prescribed a new class of medication for treating elevated levels of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ≥8% (64 mmol/mol), BP ≥140/90 mmHg, or LDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL, to receive 1) one scripted telephone call from a diabetes educator or clinical pharmacist to identify and address nonadherence to the new medication or 2) usual care. Hierarchical linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the impact on 1) the first medication fill within 60 days of the prescription; 2) two or more medication fills within 180 days of the prescription; and 3) clinically significant improvement in levels of A1C, BP, or LDL cholesterol.

RESULTS

Of the 2,378 subjects, 89.3% in the intervention group and 87.4% in the usual-care group had sufficient data to analyze study outcomes. In intent-to-treat analyses, intervention was not associated with significant improvement in primary adherence, medication persistence, or intermediate outcomes of care. Results were similar across subgroups of patients defined by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and study site, and when limiting the analysis to those who completed the intended intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This low-intensity intervention did not significantly improve medication adherence or control of glucose, BP, or LDL cholesterol. Wide use of this strategy does not appear to be warranted; alternative approaches to identify and improve medication adherence and persistence are needed.

Patterns of Adherence to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents and Glucose Control among Primary Care Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Researchers sought to examine whether there are patterns of oral hypoglycemic-agent adherence among primary-care patients with type 2 diabetes that are related to patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Longitudinal analysis via growth curve mixture modeling was carried out to classify 180 patients who participated in an adherence intervention according to patterns of adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents across 12 weeks. Three patterns of change in adherence were identified: adherent, increasing adherence, and nonadherent. Global cognition and intervention condition were associated with pattern of change in adherence (p < .05). Patients with an increasing adherence pattern were more likely to have an Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 7%; adjusted odds ratio = 14.52, 95% CI (2.54, 82.99) at 12 weeks, in comparison with patients with the nonadherent pattern. Identification of patients with type 2 diabetes at risk of nonadherence is important for clinical prognosis and the development and delivery of interventions.

The effect of chairside chronic disease screenings by oral health professionals on health care costs

OBJECTIVES

We estimated short-term health care cost savings that would result from oral health professionals performing chronic disease screenings.

METHODS

We used population data, estimates of chronic disease prevalence, and rates of medication adherence from the literature to estimate cost savings that would result from screening individuals aged 40 years and older who have seen a dentist but not a physician in the last 12 months. We estimated 1-year savings if patients identified during screening in a dental setting were referred to a physician, completed their referral, and started pharmacological treatment.

RESULTS

We estimated that medical screenings for diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia in dental offices could save the health care system from $42.4 million ($13.51 per person screened) to $102.6 million ($32.72 per person screened) over 1 year, dependent on the rate of referral completion from the dental clinic to the physician's office.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral health professionals can potentially play a bigger role in detecting chronic disease in the US population. Additional prevention and monitoring activities over the long term could achieve even greater savings and health benefits.

Association of Weight Loss and Medication Adherence Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: SHIELD (Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes)

BACKGROUND

Adherence to prescribed diabetes medications is suboptimal, which can lead to poor glycemic control and diabetic complications. Treatment-related weight gain is a side effect of some oral antidiabetic agents and insulin, which may negatively affect adherence to therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who lost weight had better medication adherence than those who gained weight.

METHODS

Weight change over 1 year (2007 to 2008) was assessed among respondents in the US Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes (SHIELD). Weight loss of >1.0%, ≥3%, and ≥5% of weight was compared with weight gain of ≥1.0%. Medication adherence was assessed using the Morisky 4-item questionnaire for medication-taking behavior, with lower scores representing better adherence.

RESULTS

There were 746 T2DM respondents who lost >1.0%, 483 who lost ≥3%, 310 who lost ≥5%, and 670 who gained ≥1.0% of weight. Each weight-loss group had significantly lower Morisky scores than the weight-gain group; mean scores of 0.389 versus 0.473 (P = 0.050) for the >1.0% weight-loss group, 0.365 versus 0.473 (P = 0.026) for the ≥3% weight-loss group, and 0.334 versus 0.473 (P = 0.014) for the ≥5% weight-loss group. Significantly fewer respondents who lost weight had received insulin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione therapy (57%) compared with respondents who gained weight (64%) (P = 0.002). Demographics, exercise habits, and dieting were similar between weight-loss and weight-gain groups.

CONCLUSIONS

T2DM respondents with weight loss had significantly better medication adherence and were less likely to be on treatment regimens that increase weight than T2DM respondents with weight gain. These findings suggest that strategies that lead to weight loss, including use of diabetes medications associated with weight loss, may improve medication adherence.

Predictors of medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Medical professionals are often challenged by lack of patient compliance with pharmaceutical treatments. Research has shown that patients with diabetes have one of the lowest medication adherence rates at 65% to 85%. Some causes have been identified in the literature, but the influence of type of medication is unknown. This study assessed the impact of a broad range of factors on medication adherence and persistence among adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Patients were selected from the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases of healthcare administrative claims (2009 through 2012), assigned to mutually exclusive cohorts based on initiation of saxagliptin (a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitor), or a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (daily or twice daily formulation), sulfonylurea (SU), or thiazolidinedione (TZD), and screened for continuous enrollment 1 year before and after drug initiation. Adherence and persistence were measured using proportion of days covered and time to discontinuation, respectively. Multivariate models were used to examine the impact of study drug and demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 45.1% of patients were adherent with their study drug over the 1 year follow-up period. Adherence was higher among patients who were male, older, or residing in non-Southern states. Adherence was better with mail-order use and lower levels of cost sharing. Patients taking a GLP-1 (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.37, 0.42), SU (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.46, 0.52), or TZD (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.51, 0.57) were less likely to be adherent compared with those taking saxagliptin. Results were mixed regarding the impact of comorbidities and polypharmacy on medication adherence. Influencing factors may be the type of comorbidity, overall health level, number of drugs, and complexity of the drug regimen.

KEY LIMITATIONS

Adherence was measured using data for prescriptions dispensed and it is not known whether patients actually took the medications, hence adherence may be overestimated. Whether patients who discontinued the study drugs switched to other diabetes medications or discontinued treatment completely was not measured.

CONCLUSION

Identified risk factors can guide medical professionals in their attempts to increase the likelihood of patient adherence to drug treatment regimens.

Impact of glycemic control on healthcare resource utilization and costs of type 2 diabetes: current and future pharmacologic approaches to improving outcomes

BACKGROUND

The incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes continue to grow in the United States and worldwide, along with the growing prevalence of obesity. Patients with type 2 diabetes are at greater risk for comorbid cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD), which dramatically affects overall healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVES

To review the impact of glycemic control and medication adherence on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs of patients with type 2 diabetes, and to highlight the need for new drug therapies to improve outcomes in this patient population.

METHODS

This comprehensive literature search was conducted for the period between 2000 and 2013, using MEDLINE, to identify published articles that report the associations between glycemic control, medication adherence, CV morbidity and mortality, and healthcare utilization and costs. Search terms included "type 2 diabetes," "adherence," "compliance," "nonadherence," "drug therapy," "resource use," "cost," and "cost-effectiveness."

DISCUSSION

Despite improvements in the management of CV risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes, outcomes remain poor. The costs associated with the management of type 2 diabetes are increasing dramatically as the prevalence of the disease increases. Medication adherence to long-term drug therapy remains poor in patients with type 2 diabetes and contributes to poor glycemic control in this patient population, increased healthcare resource utilization and increased costs, as well as increased rates of comorbid CVD and mortality. Furthermore, poor adherence to established evidence-based guidelines for type 2 diabetes, including underdiagnosis and undertreatment, contributes to poor outcomes. New approaches to the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes currently in development have the potential to improve medication adherence and consequently glycemic control, which in turn will help to reduce associated costs and healthcare utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

As the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and its associated comorbidities grows, healthcare costs will continue to increase, indicating a need for better approaches to achieve glycemic control and manage comorbid conditions. Drug therapies are needed that enhance patient adherence and persistence levels far above levels reported with currently available drugs. Improvements in adherence to treatment guidelines and greater rates of lifestyle modifications also are needed. A serious unmet need exists for greatly improved patient outcomes, more effective and more tolerable drugs, as well as marked improvements in adherence to treatment guidelines and drug therapy to positively impact healthcare costs and resource use.

Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is a common and costly illness, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite this, there is relatively little information on the 'real-world' medication utilization patterns for patients with type 2 diabetes initiating exenatide BID or glargine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the 'real-world' medication utilization patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide BID (exenatide) versus insulin glargine (glargine).

METHODS

Adult patients( ≥18 years of age) with type 2 diabetes who were new initiators of exenatide or glargine from October 1, 2006 through March 31, 2008 with continuous enrollment for the 12 months pre- and 18 months post-index period were selected from the MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Databases. To control for selection bias, propensity score matching was used to complete a 1:1 match of glargine to exenatide patients. Key study outcomes (including the likelihood of overall treatment modification, discontinuation, switching, or intensification) were analyzed using survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 9,197 exenatide- and 4,499 glargine-treated patients were selected. Propensity score matching resulted in 3,774 matched pairs with a mean age of 57 years and a mean Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 1.6; 54% of patients were males. The 18-month treatment intensification rates were 15.9% and 26.0% (p < 0.0001) and the discontinuation rates were 38.3% and 40.0% (p = 0.14) for exenatide and glargine, respectively. Alternatively, 14.9% of exenatide-treated patients switched therapies, compared to 10.0% of glargine-treated patients (p < 0.0001). Overall, glargine-treated patients were more likely to modify their treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.33, p < 0.0001] with shorter mean time on treatment until modification (123 vs. 159 days, p < 0.0001). Compared to exenatide-treated patients, glargine-treated patients were more likely to discontinue [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.25, p < 0.0001] or intensify therapy (HR = 1.72, p < 0.0001) but less likely to switch (HR = 0.71, p < 0.0001) the index therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated for type 2 diabetes with exenatide BID or insulin glargine differ in their adherence to therapy. Exenatide-treated patients were less likely to discontinue or modify treatment but more likely to switch therapy compared to glargine-treated patients.

Measuring concurrent oral hypoglycemic and antidepressant adherence and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Many patients experience difficulty in adhering to medication for both physical and mental health. Our objective was to compare selfreported adherence and electronic monitoring of adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents and antidepressants and to examine the relationship of adherence with clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Primary care-based longitudinal study.

METHODS

Adherence was assessed in 180 patients prescribed pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and depression enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of an integrated intervention for depression and T2DM. Adherence data were collected using self report and electronic monitoring. Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) assays were used to measure glycemic control, and the 9-item patient health questionnaire assessed depression.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, self-reported adherence and electronic monitoring of adherence showed fair agreement (kappa = 0.213, P = .004 for oral hypoglycemic agents and kappa = 0.380, P < .001 for antidepressants). Patients who achieved >80% adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents measured with electronic monitoring were more likely to achieve A1C < 7% compared with patients who did not achieve > 80% adherence at 12 weeks (adjusted odds ratio = 3.52, 95% confidence interval 1.07-11.57). Self-reported adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents was not associated with diabetes outcomes. Measures of adherence for antidepressants were not associated with depression outcomes in models adjusted for potentially influential covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with electronic monitoring of adherence, self-reported adherence tended to overestimate medication adherence. Electronic monitoring of adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents predicted glycemic control, but self-reported adherence did not predict clinical outcomes.

Greater adherence to diabetes drugs is linked to less hospital use and could save nearly $5 billion annually

Improving adherence to medication offers the possibility of both reducing costs and improving care for patients with chronic illness. We examined a national sample of diabetes patients from 2005 to 2008 and found that improved adherence to diabetes medications was associated with 13 percent lower odds of subsequent hospitalizations or emergency department visits. Similarly, losing adherence was associated with 15 percent higher odds of these outcomes. Based on these and other effects, we project that improved adherence to diabetes medication could avert 699,000 emergency department visits and 341,000 hospitalizations annually, for a saving of $4.7 billion. Eliminating the loss of adherence (which occurred in one out of every four patients in our sample) would lead to another $3.6 billion in savings, for a combined potential savings of $8.3 billion. These benefits were particularly pronounced among poor and minority patients. Our analysis suggests that improved adherence among patients with diabetes should be a key goal for the health care system and policy makers. Strategies might include reducing copayments for certain medications or providing feedback about adherence to patients and providers through electronic health records.

Impact of Part D low-income subsidies on medication patterns for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether low-income subsidies (LIS) under Medicare Part D help beneficiaries overcome impediments to medication use associated with poor socioeconomic status and high disease burden.

OBJECTIVES

To compare Medicare beneficiaries with LIS and Medicaid (duals), LIS without dual eligibility, and non-LIS recipients on use of medications recommended in diabetes treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Fixed-effect comparisons among beneficiaries in the same Part D plans in 2006-2007.

SUBJECTS

Nationally representative sample of enrollees in Part D prescription drug plans. A total of 109,292 beneficiaries were in 204 prescription drug plans; 47.5% non-LIS, 44.4% duals, and 8.1% nondual LIS recipients.

MEASURES

Medications included antidiabetic agents, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and antihyperlipidemics. Drug use was measured by exposure, duration of therapy, and medication possession ratio.

RESULTS

The LIS dual cohort had significantly higher comorbidity compared with non-LIS comparisons, LIS nonduals were significantly more likely to take medications in all 3 drug classes compared with non-LIS recipients, but differences were small (between 2% and 4%; P<0.05). Non-LIS recipients and duals had equivalent exposure to any antidiabetic drug and antihyperlipidemics, but duals were 3% less likely to receive renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors compared with non-LIS recipients (P<0.05). Small differences in adjusted values for duration of therapy and medication possession ratio among the 3 cohorts were also observed, none of which were clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

Similarities in medication utilization among Part D enrollees with and without LIS coverage supports the program objective of providing enhanced access to needed medications for diverse groups of Medicare beneficiaries.

Simulated value-based insurance design applied to statin use by Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To examine cost responsiveness and total costs associated with a simulated "value-based" insurance design for statin therapy in a Medicare population with diabetes.

METHODS

Four-year panels were constructed from the 1997-2005 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey selected by self-report or claims-based diagnoses of diabetes in year 1 and use of statins in year 2 (N = 899). We computed the number of 30-day statin prescription fills, out-of-pocket and third-party drug costs, and Medicare Part A and Part B spending. Multivariate ordinary least squares regression models predicted statin fills as a function of out-of-pocket costs, and a generalized linear model with log link predicted Medicare spending as a function of number of fills, controlling for baseline characteristics. Estimated coefficients were used to simulate changes in fills associated with co-payment caps from $25 to $1 and to compute changes in third-party payments and Medicare cost offsets associated with incremental fills. Analyses were stratified by patient cardiovascular event risk.

RESULTS

A simulated out-of-pocket price of $25 [$1] increased plan drug spending by $340 [$794] and generated Medicare Part A/B savings of $262 [$531]; savings for high-risk patients were $558 [$1193], generating a net saving of $249 [$415].

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing statin co-payments for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes resulted in modestly increased use and reduced medical spending. The value-based insurance design simulation strategy met financial feasibility criteria but only for higher-risk patients.

New bundled world: quality of care and readmission in diabetes patients

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmissions among patients with diabetes are substantial and costly. Although prior studies have shown that receipt of outpatient quality of care significantly reduces the risk of hospitalization among patients with diabetes, little is known about its impact on hospital readmission. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of outpatient quality of care on 30-day readmission among patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We used deidentified administrative claims data from the IMS LifeLink and included commercially insured diabetes patients ≥ 19 years old discharged from hospitals in the United States in 2009 and 2010 (n = 30,139). The outcome was readmission within 2-30 days of discharge. The main independent variables were receipt of outpatient quality-of-care measures (i.e., two hemoglobin A1c tests, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) test, 90-day supply of statin, and 90-day supply of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of outpatient quality of care on hospital readmission while controlling for demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, and insurance type in the year prior to admission.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day readmission rates among patients with diabetes were 18.9%. Patients who received at least one LDL test [odds ratio (OR) = 0.918, 95% confidence interval (CI; 0.852 0.989), p < .025] and ≥90-day supply of statins (OR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.85 0.97], p < .01) were less likely to be readmitted to the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of LDL testing and adherence to statin medications were effective in decreasing the likelihood of 30-day hospital readmission and may be considered as elements of a quality focused incentive-based health care delivery package for diabetes patients.

Does medication adherence lower Medicare spending among beneficiaries with diabetes?

OBJECTIVE

To measure 3-year medication possession ratios (MPRs) for renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and statins for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes, and to assess whether better adherence is associated with lower spending on traditional Medicare services controlling for biases common to previous adherence studies.

DATA SOURCE

Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data from 1997 to 2005.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal study of RAAS-inhibitor and statin utilization over 3 years.

DATA COLLECTION

The relationship between MPR and Medicare costs was tested in multivariate models with extensive behavioral variables to control for indication bias and healthy adherer bias.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Over 3 years, median MPR values were 0.88 for RAAS-I users and 0.77 for statin users. Higher adherence was strongly associated with lower Medicare spending in the multivariate analysis. A 10 percentage point increase in statin MPR was associated with U.S.$832 lower Medicare spending (SE=219; p<.01). A 10 percentage point increase in MPR for RAAS-Is was associated with U.S.$285 lower Medicare costs (SE=114; p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher adherence with RAAS-Is and statins by Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes results in lower cumulative Medicare spending over 3 years. At the margin, Medicare savings exceed the cost of the drugs.

A comparison of adherence to hypoglycemic medications between Type 2 diabetes patients with and without serious mental illness

Inadequate self-management of chronic medical conditions like Type 2 diabetes may play a role in the poor health status of individuals with serious mental illnesses. We compared adherence to hypoglycemic medications and blood glucose control between 44 diabetes patients with a serious mental illness and 30 patients without a psychiatric illness. The two groups did not differ in their ability to manage a complex medication regimen as assessed by a performance-based measure of medication management capacity. However, significantly fewer patients with a mental illness self-reported nonadherence to their hypoglycemic regimens compared to those without a mental illness. Although individuals with mental illnesses also had better control of blood glucose, this metabolic parameter was not correlated with adherence to hypoglycemic medications in either patient group. The experience of managing a chronic mental illness may confer advantages to individuals with serious mental illnesses in the self-care of co-occurring medical conditions like Type 2 diabetes.

Physician effectiveness in interventions to improve cardiovascular medication adherence: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence.

DESIGN

We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008.

SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS

We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes.

MAIN MEASURES

Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES).

KEY RESULTS

We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians.

Impact of fixed-dose and multi-pill combination dyslipidemia therapies on medication adherence and the economic burden of sub-optimal adherence

OBJECTIVE

To compare medication adherence between patients initiating fixed-dose combination versus multi-pill combination dyslipidemia therapies and assess the association between optimal adherence (MPR > or = 80%) and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-associated total healthcare resource utilization (THR) and costs (THC).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The HealthCore Integrated Research Database was used to identify patients > or =18 years newly initiating fixed-dose combination [niacin extended-release (NER) and lovastatin (NERL)] or multi-pill combination therapies [NER and simvastatin (NER/S) or lovastatin (NER/L)] between 1/1/2000 and 6/30/2006 (index date), with minimum 18 months of follow-up. Adherence was measured using medication possession ratio (MPR). Three multivariate models were developed controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. A logistic model evaluated the association between study cohorts and optimal adherence, while negative binomial and gamma models estimated the association between optimal adherence and CVD-associated THR and THC, respectively.

RESULTS

In all, 6638 NERL, 1687 NER/S, and 663 NER/L patients were identified. Fixed-dose combination patients were younger [mean (SD) ages of 51.9 (10.5) vs. 56.0 (9.4) [NER/S] and 56.1 (10.6) [NER/L]; p < 0.01], had lower comorbidity (Deyo-Charlson Index 0.50 +/- 0.9 vs. 0.7 +/- 1.1 and 0.6 +/- 1.1, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05) and comprised fewer males (73.1 vs. 83.0% and 77.7%; p < 0.01 and p = 0.1). Fixed-dose combination patients had higher average 1-year MPR versus NER/S and NER/L patients (0.54 +/- 0.35 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.35 and 0.47 +/- 0.34, p < 0.01). NER/S and NER/L patients were 31.3% (95% CI: 22.9-39.5%) and 39.1% (95% CI: 26.7-49.4%) less likely to be optimally adherent than fixed-dose combination patients (p < 0.01). Additionally, optimally adherent patients had 8% and 40% decreases in annual CVD-attributable THR [0.920 (95% CI: 0.857-0.989); p = 0.023] and THC [0.601 (95% CI: 0.427-0.845); p = 0.003] versus sub-optimally adherent patients. Key limitations of the study include the limited ability of MPR to analyze the continuity of medication usage, inability to capture data on other key variables including race, income, and clinical characteristics such as smoking history, absence of laboratory values on all study patients, inability to capture over-the-counter fills of niacin, and inability to show causality of results obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence was significantly higher among patients initiating fixed-dose combination versus multi-pill combination dyslipidemia therapies in this managed-care population. Additionally, patients with optimal adherence had a significantly lower CVD-associated THR and THC versus patients with sub-optimal adherence.