1
|
Gandy M, Coleman H, Cutler H, Jones MP, Karin E, Kwan P, Nikpour A, Parratt K, Rayner G, Titov N, Todd L, Seil E, Winton‐Brown T, Wu W, Dear BF. Comparative effectiveness of digital mental healthcare models for adults with epilepsy: A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:808-818. [PMID: 38345357 PMCID: PMC10984311 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mental health complaints are prevalent among people with epilepsy, yet there are major barriers that prevent access to psychological care, including high out-of-pocket costs and a lack of accessible specialized services. The purpose of the current study is to examine the comparative efficacy, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term outcomes of a digital psychological intervention when delivered under two models of care (i.e., guided vs. unguided) in supporting the mental health and functioning of adults with epilepsy. METHOD Approximately 375 participants across Australia will be enrolled. Eligible participants will have a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy, experience difficulties with their emotional health, be at least 18 years of age, and live in Australia. Participants will be randomized (2:2:1) to receive the Wellbeing Neuro Course, a 10-week internet-delivered program, with (i.e., guided) or without guidance by a mental health clinician (i.e., unguided), or be allocated to a treatment-as-usual waiting-list control group. Participants will complete online questionnaires at pre-, post-treatment, and 3- and 12-month follow-up and consent to have their data linked to their medical records to capture healthcare system resource use and costs. ANALYSIS Primary outcome measures will be symptoms of depression and anxiety. A cost-utility analysis will be undertaken using the Australian healthcare system perspective and according to current economic evaluation guidelines. Resource use and costs to the healthcare system during the study period will be captured via data linkage to relevant administrative datasets in Australia. SIGNIFICANCE The results of this trial will provide important data concerning the relative outcomes of these different models of care and will inform the integration of digital psychological interventions translation into healthcare services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Human Research Ethics Committee of Macquarie University approved the proposed study (Reference No: 520231325151475). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication(s). ANZCTR TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12623001327673. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY This study seeks to find out if a 10-week online psychological treatment can improve the mental health and well-being of Australian adults with epilepsy. Around 375 participants will be randomly assigned to different groups: one will receive treatment with guidance from mental health clinician (guided group), one without guidance (unguided group), and one starting later (waiting control group). All participants will fill out the same outcome measures online. The main goal of this research is to compare these groups and assess how well the treatment works in improving mental health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Gandy
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Honor Coleman
- Melbourne School of Psychological SciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Australian Institute of Health InnovationMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Business SchoolSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Michael P. Jones
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Eyal Karin
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Patrick Kwan
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Department of NeurologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kaitlyn Parratt
- Department of NeurologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- The Epilepsy Society of AustraliaSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Genevieve Rayner
- Melbourne School of Psychological SciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Comprehensive Epilepsy ProgramAlfred HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Nickolai Titov
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- MindSpotMQ Health, Macquarie UniversityNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lisa Todd
- Epilepsy Action AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Seil
- Australian Institute of Health InnovationMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Business SchoolSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Toby Winton‐Brown
- Comprehensive Epilepsy ProgramAlfred HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Wendy Wu
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Blake F. Dear
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- MindSpotMQ Health, Macquarie UniversityNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheek C, Hayba N, Richardson L, Austin EE, Francis Auton E, Safi M, Ransolin N, Vukasovic M, De Los Santos A, Murphy M, Harrison R, Churruca K, Long JC, Hibbert PD, Carrigan A, Newman B, Hutchinson K, Mitchell R, Cutler H, Holt L, Braithwaite J, Gillies D, Salmon PM, Walpola RL, Zurynski Y, Ellis LA, Smith K, Brown A, Ali R, Gwynne K, Clay-Williams R. Experience-based codesign approach to improve care in Australian emergency departments for complex consumer cohorts: the MyED project protocol, Stages 1.1-1.3. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072908. [PMID: 37407042 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emergency department (ED) care must adapt to meet current and future demands. In Australia, ED quality measures (eg, prolonged length of stay, re-presentations or patient experience) are worse for older adults with multiple comorbidities, people who have a disability, those who present with a mental health condition, Indigenous Australians, and those with a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) background. Strengthened ED performance relies on understanding the social and systemic barriers and preferences for care of these different cohorts, and identifying viable solutions that may result in sustained improvement by service providers. A collaborative 5-year project (MyED) aims to codesign, with ED users and providers, new or adapted models of care that improve ED performance, improve patient outcomes and improve patient experience for these five cohorts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Experience-based codesign using mixed methods, set in three hospitals in one health district in Australia. This protocol introduces the staged and incremental approach to the whole project, and details the first research elements: ethnographic observations at the ED care interface, interviews with providers and interviews with two patient cohorts-older adults and adults with a CALD background. We aim to sample a diverse range of participants, carefully tailoring recruitment and support. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been obtained from the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/PID02749-2022/ETH02447). Prior informed written consent will be obtained from all research participants. Findings from each stage of the project will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication. Project outputs will be disseminated for implementation more widely across New South Wales, Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Cheek
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nema Hayba
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lieke Richardson
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth E Austin
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emilie Francis Auton
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mariam Safi
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natália Ransolin
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew Vukasovic
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aaron De Los Santos
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Blacktown and Mount Druitt Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Margaret Murphy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Reema Harrison
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Churruca
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janet C Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter D Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of South Australia Division of Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ann Carrigan
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bronwyn Newman
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Hutchinson
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leanne Holt
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Donna Gillies
- NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul M Salmon
- Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ramesh Lahiru Walpola
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Zurynski
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise A Ellis
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kylie Smith
- Emergency Care Institute, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Brown
- Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Reza Ali
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Blacktown and Mount Druitt Hospital, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kylie Gwynne
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huckvale K, Hoon L, Stech E, Newby JM, Zheng WY, Han J, Vasa R, Gupta S, Barnett S, Senadeera M, Cameron S, Kurniawan S, Agarwal A, Kupper JF, Asbury J, Willie D, Grant A, Cutler H, Parkinson B, Ahumada-Canale A, Beames JR, Logothetis R, Bautista M, Rosenberg J, Shvetcov A, Quinn T, Mackinnon A, Rana S, Tran T, Rosenbaum S, Mouzakis K, Werner-Seidler A, Whitton A, Venkatesh S, Christensen H. Protocol for a bandit-based response adaptive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of brief self-guided digital interventions for reducing psychological distress in university students: the Vibe Up study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066249. [PMID: 37116996 PMCID: PMC10151864 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meta-analytical evidence confirms a range of interventions, including mindfulness, physical activity and sleep hygiene, can reduce psychological distress in university students. However, it is unclear which intervention is most effective. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven adaptive trials may be an efficient method to determine what works best and for whom. The primary purpose of the study is to rank the effectiveness of mindfulness, physical activity, sleep hygiene and an active control on reducing distress, using a multiarm contextual bandit-based AI-adaptive trial method. Furthermore, the study will explore which interventions have the largest effect for students with different levels of baseline distress severity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Vibe Up study is a pragmatically oriented, decentralised AI-adaptive group sequential randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of one of three brief, 2-week digital self-guided interventions (mindfulness, physical activity or sleep hygiene) or active control (ecological momentary assessment) in reducing self-reported psychological distress in Australian university students. The adaptive trial methodology involves up to 12 sequential mini-trials that allow for the optimisation of allocation ratios. The primary outcome is change in psychological distress (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, 21-item version, DASS-21 total score) from preintervention to postintervention. Secondary outcomes include change in physical activity, sleep quality and mindfulness from preintervention to postintervention. Planned contrasts will compare the four groups (ie, the three intervention and control) using self-reported psychological distress at prespecified time points for interim analyses. The study aims to determine the best performing intervention, as well as ranking of other interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was sought and obtained from the UNSW Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC A, HC200466). A trial protocol adhering to the requirements of the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice was prepared for and approved by the Sponsor, UNSW Sydney (Protocol number: HC200466_CTP). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12621001223820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Huckvale
- Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leonard Hoon
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eileen Stech
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jill M Newby
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wu Yi Zheng
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jin Han
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rajesh Vasa
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Barnett
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Manisha Senadeera
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stuart Cameron
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefanus Kurniawan
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Akash Agarwal
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joost Funke Kupper
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua Asbury
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Willie
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alasdair Grant
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Joanne R Beames
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rena Logothetis
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marya Bautista
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jodie Rosenberg
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Artur Shvetcov
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Quinn
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Mackinnon
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Santu Rana
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Truyen Tran
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon Rosenbaum
- School of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kon Mouzakis
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Alexis Whitton
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Svetha Venkatesh
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Christensen
- Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahumada-Canale A, Jeet V, Bilgrami A, Seil E, Gu Y, Cutler H. Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting and resource allocation tools in hospital decisions: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2023; 322:115790. [PMID: 36913838 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Health care budgets in high-income countries are having issues coping with unsustainable growth in demand, particularly in the hospital setting. Despite this, implementing tools systematising priority setting and resource allocation decisions has been challenging. This study answers two questions: (1) what are the barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting tools in the hospital setting of high-income countries? and (2) what is their fidelity? A systematic review using the Cochrane methods was conducted including studies of hospital-related priority setting tools reporting barriers or facilitators for implementation, published after the year 2000. Barriers and facilitators were classified using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Fidelity was assessed using priority setting tool's standards. Out of thirty studies, ten reported program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA), twelve multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), six health technology assessment (HTA) related frameworks, and two, an ad hoc tool. Barriers and facilitators were outlined across all CFIR domains. Implementation factors not frequently observed, such as 'evidence of previous successful tool application', 'knowledge and beliefs about the intervention' or 'external policy and incentives' were reported. Conversely, some constructs did not yield any barrier or facilitator including 'intervention source' or 'peer pressure'. PBMA studies satisfied the fidelity criteria between 86% and 100%, for MCDA it varied between 36% and 100%, and for HTA it was between 27% and 80%. However, fidelity was not related to implementation. This study is the first to use an implementation science approach. Results represent the starting point for organisations wishing to use priority setting tools in the hospital setting by providing an overview of barriers and facilitators. These factors can be used to assess readiness for implementation or to serve as the foundation for process evaluations. Through our findings, we aim to improve the uptake of priority setting tools and support their sustainable use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Ahumada-Canale
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
| | - Varinder Jeet
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
| | - Anam Bilgrami
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth Seil
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
| | - Yuanyuan Gu
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
| | - Henry Cutler
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aghdaee M, Gu Y, Sinha K, Parkinson B, Sharma R, Cutler H. Mapping the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) to EQ-5D-5L. Pharmacoeconomics 2023; 41:187-198. [PMID: 36336773 PMCID: PMC9883346 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01157-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) is gaining popularity as healthcare system funders increasingly seek value-based care. However, it is limited in its ability to estimate utilities and thus inform economic evaluations. This study develops the first mapping algorithm for estimating EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) utilities from PROMIS-29 responses using a large dataset and through extensive comparisons between econometric models. METHODS An online survey was conducted to collect responses to PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D-5L from the general Australian population (N = 3013). Direct and indirect mapping methods were explored, including linear regression, Tobit, generalised linear model, censored regression model, beta regression (Betamix), the adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model (ALDVMM) and generalised ordered logit. The most robust model was selected by assessing the performance based on average ten-fold cross-validation geometric mean absolute error and geometric mean squared error, the predicted mean, maximum and minimum utilities, as well as the fitting across the entire distribution. RESULTS The direct approach using ALDVMM was considered the preferred model based on lowest geometric mean absolute error and geometric mean squared error in cross-validation (0.0882, 0.0299) and its superiority in predicting the actual observed mean, full health states and lower utility extremes. The robustness and precision in prediction across the entire distribution of utilities with ALDVMM suggest it is an accurate and valid mapping algorithm. Moreover, the suggested mapping algorithm outperformed previously published algorithms using Australian data, indicating the validity of this model for economic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS This study developed a robust algorithm to estimate EQ-5D-5L utilities from PROMIS-29. Consistent with the recent literature, the ALDVMM outperformed all other econometric models considered in this study, suggesting that the mixture models have relatively better performance and are an ideal candidate model for mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Aghdaee
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Yuanyuan Gu
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kompal Sinha
- Department of Economics, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rajan Sharma
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Level 5, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aghdaee M, Parkinson B, Sinha K, Gu Y, Sharma R, Olin E, Cutler H. An examination of machine learning to map non-preference based patient reported outcome measures to health state utility values. Health Econ 2022; 31:1525-1557. [PMID: 35704682 PMCID: PMC9545032 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Non-preference-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are popular in health outcomes research. These measures, however, cannot be used to estimate health state utilities, limiting their usefulness for economic evaluations. Mapping PROMs to a multi-attribute utility instrument is one solution. While mapping is commonly conducted using econometric techniques, failing to specify the complex interactions between variables may lead to inaccurate prediction of utilities, resulting in inaccurate estimates of cost-effectiveness and suboptimal funding decisions. These issues can be addressed using machine learning. This paper evaluates the use of machine learning as a mapping tool. We adopt a comprehensive approach to compare six machine learning techniques with eight econometric techniques to map the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health 10 (PROMIS-GH10) to the EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D-5L). Using data collected from 2015 Australians, we find the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model out-performed all machine learning techniques and the adjusted limited dependent variable mixture model (ALDVMM) out-performed all econometric techniques, with the LASSO performing better than ALDVMM. The variable selection feature of LASSO was then used to enhance the performance of the ALDVMM in a hybrid model. Our analysis identifies the potential benefits and challenges of using machine learning techniques for mapping and offers important insights for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Aghdaee
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomyMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomyMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kompal Sinha
- Department of EconomicsMacquarie Business SchoolMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Yuanyuan Gu
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomyMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Rajan Sharma
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomyMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Emma Olin
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomyMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomyMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cutler H, Gumbie M, Olin E, Parkinson B, Bowman R, Quadri H, Mann T. The cost-effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implants in UK adults. Eur J Health Econ 2022; 23:763-779. [PMID: 34727294 PMCID: PMC9170662 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01393-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated its eligibility criteria for unilateral cochlear implants (UCIs) in 2019. NICE claimed this would not impact the cost-effectiveness results used within its 2009 technology appraisal guidance. This claim is uncertain given changed clinical practice and increased healthcare unit costs. Our objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness estimates of UCIs in UK adults with severe to profound hearing loss within the contemporary NHS environment. METHODS A cost-utility analysis employing a Markov model was undertaken to compare UCIs with hearing aids or no hearing aids for people with severe to profound hearing loss. A clinical pathway was developed to estimate resource use. Health-related quality of life, potential adverse events, device upgrades and device failure were captured. Unit costs were derived mostly from the NHS data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis further assessed the effect of uncertain model inputs. RESULTS A UCI is likely to be deemed cost-effective when compared to a hearing aid (£11,946/QALY) or no hearing aid (£10,499/QALY). A UCI has an 93.0% and 98.7% likelihood of being cost-effective within the UK adult population when compared to a hearing aid or no hearing aid, respectively. ICERs were mostly sensitive to the proportion of people eligible for cochlear implant, discount rate, surgery and device costs and processor upgrade cost. CONCLUSION UCIs remain cost-effective despite changes to clinical practice and increased healthcare unit costs. Updating the NICE criteria to provide better access UCIs is projected to increase annual implants in adults and children by 70% and expenditure by £28.6 million within three years. This increased access to UCIs will further improve quality of life of recipients and overall social welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Cutler
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Mutsa Gumbie
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emma Olin
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ross Bowman
- Health Technology Analysts, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park KH, Tickle L, Cutler H. A systematic review and meta-analysis on impact of suboptimal use of antidepressants, bisphosphonates, and statins on healthcare resource utilisation and healthcare cost. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269836. [PMID: 35767543 PMCID: PMC9242484 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Depression, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease impose a heavy economic burden on society. Understanding economic impacts of suboptimal use of medication due to nonadherence and non-persistence (non-MAP) for these conditions is important for clinical practice and health policy-making. Objective This systematic literature review aims to assess the impact of non-MAP to antidepressants, bisphosphonates and statins on healthcare resource utilisation and healthcare cost (HRUHC), and to assess how these impacts differ across medication classes. Methods A systematic literature review and an aggregate meta-analysis were performed. Using the search protocol developed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, JSTOR and EconLit were searched for articles that explored the relationship between non-MAP and HRUHC (i.e., use of hospital, visit to healthcare service providers other than hospital, and healthcare cost components including medical cost and pharmacy cost) published from November 2004 to April 2021. Inverse-variance meta-analysis was used to assess the relationship between non-MAP and HRUHC when reported for at least two different populations. Results Screening 1,123 articles left 10, seven and 13 articles on antidepressants, bisphosphonates, and statins, respectively. Of those, 27 were rated of good quality, three fair and none poor using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. In general, non-MAP was positively associated with HRUHC for all three medication classes and most prominently for bisphosphonates, although the relationships differed across HRUHC components and medication classes. The meta-analysis found that non-MAP was associated with increased hospital cost (26%, p = 0.02), outpatient cost (10%, p = 0.01), and total medical cost excluding pharmacy cost (12%, p<0.00001) for antidepressants, and increased total healthcare cost (3%, p = 0.07) for bisphosphonates. Conclusions This systematic literature review is the first to compare the impact of non-MAP on HRUHC across medications for three prevalent conditions, depression, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Positive relationships between non-MAP and HRUHC highlight inefficiencies within the healthcare system related to non-MAP, suggesting a need to reduce non-MAP in a cost-effective way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu Hyung Park
- Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Leonie Tickle
- Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, North Ryde, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen JTH, Wuthrich VM, Rapee RM, Draper B, Brodaty H, Cutler H, Low LF, Georgiou A, Johnco C, Jones M, Meuldijk D, Partington A. Improving mental health and social participation outcomes in older adults with depression and anxiety: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269981. [PMID: 35759476 PMCID: PMC9236237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increasing both the frequency and quality of social interactions within treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in older adults may improve their mental health outcomes and quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost utility of an enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) plus social participation program in a sample of older adults with depression and/or anxiety. Methods A total of 172 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older with an anxiety and/or depressive disorder will be randomly allocated to either an enhanced CBT plus social participation program (n = 86) or standard CBT (n = 86). Both treatments will be delivered during 12 weekly individual sessions utilising structured manuals and workbooks. Participants will be assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome evaluates mean change in clinician-rated diagnostic severity of anxiety and depressive disorders from baseline to post-treatment (primary endpoint) based on a semi-structured diagnostic interview. Secondary outcomes evaluate changes in symptomatology on self-report anxiety and depression measures, as well as changes in social/community participation, social network, and perceived social support, loneliness, quality of life, and use of health services. Economic benefits will be evaluated using a cost-utility analysis to derive the incremental cost utility ratios for the enhanced CBT program. Discussion Outcomes from this study will provide support for the establishment of improved psychosocial treatment for older adults with anxiety and/or depression. Study outcomes will also provide health systems with a clear means to reduce the impact of poor emotional health in older age and its associated economic burden. In addition to the empirical validation of a novel treatment, the current study will contribute to the current understanding of the role of social participation in older adult wellbeing. Trial registration Prospectively registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ID: ACTRN12619000242123; registered 19th February 2019) and the ISRCTN registry (ID: ISRCTN78951376; registered 10th July 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessamine Tsan-Hsiang Chen
- Centre for Emotional Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Viviana M. Wuthrich
- Centre for Emotional Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ronald M. Rapee
- Centre for Emotional Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brian Draper
- Older Persons’ Mental Health Services, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre of Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Older Persons’ Mental Health Services, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre of Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Macquarie Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lee-Fay Low
- Ageing, Work and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carly Johnco
- Centre for Emotional Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Jones
- Centre for Emotional Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Denise Meuldijk
- Centre for Emotional Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Ageing, Cognition and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Black Dog Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Partington
- Macquarie Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parkinson B, Cutler H. Application of an economic evaluation approach to making regulatory decisions regarding access to medicines: advantages, challenges and recommendations. AUST HEALTH REV 2021; 46:143-149. [PMID: 34903326 DOI: 10.1071/ah20208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Initially patients require a prescription to access most new medicines. Some medicines may later be reclassified, allowing patients to access them without a prescription. Currently, Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration guidelines regarding reclassification decisions focus on patient risk rather than on potential benefits to patient health and the healthcare system. We conducted two extensive case studies demonstrating an economic evaluation approach to medicine reclassification in Australia, which were presented at various conferences and to key stakeholders. This article discusses the advantages and challenges of using an economic evaluation approach to inform medicine reclassification decisions. Advantages identified include systematically and transparently synthesising evidence from multiple sources; predicting the overall expected impact of reclassification on health outcomes and costs before it occurs; considering a broader range of risks and benefits; aggregation of health impacts into a single measure (quality-adjusted life years); identification of drivers of uncertainty; insight into the effects of different regulatory decisions; and improved consistency of evidence. Challenges include data availability and quality, estimating behavioural changes, model complexity, the lack of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold, and funding of economic analyses. We recommend that regulatory decision makers use an economic evaluation approach to help inform reclassification decisions, although economic evaluation results should be considered as part of the broader body of evidence. Ultimately, the use of an economic evaluation approach will contribute to helping decision makers maximise population health outcomes in an efficient way.What is known about the topic?In the past, decisions regarding medicine reclassification have generally been made using a deliberative approach focusing on patient risk. However, there are also potential benefits to patient health and effects on the healthcare system. Increasing awareness of these benefits have led to the development of alternative approaches to decision making, including an economic evaluation approach.What does this paper add?This article discusses the advantages and challenges of using an economic evaluation approach to inform medicine reclassification decisions compared with alternative approaches.What are the implications for practitioners?Economic evaluation results should be considered as part of the broader body of evidence regarding the types of health impacts, the extent of the available evidence, who will be affected, and the role of medical practitioners and pharmacists in mitigating any risks. However, awareness of the advantages and challenges of this approach in advance will help mitigate some of the challenges and increase acceptance of the economic evaluation results by decision makers and stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonny Parkinson
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Corresponding author
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peng CQ, Lawson KD, Heffernan M, McDonnell G, Liew D, Lybrand S, Pearson SA, Cutler H, Kritharides L, Trieu K, Huynh Q, Usherwood T, Occhipinti JA. Gazing through time and beyond the health sector: Insights from a system dynamics model of cardiovascular disease in Australia. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257760. [PMID: 34591888 PMCID: PMC8483334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To construct a whole-of-system model to inform strategies that reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Australia. METHODS A system dynamics model was developed with a multidisciplinary modelling consortium. The model population comprised Australians aged 40 years and over, and the scope encompassed acute and chronic CVD as well as primary and secondary prevention. Health outcomes were CVD-related deaths and hospitalisations, and economic outcomes were the net benefit from both the healthcare system and societal perspectives. The eight strategies broadly included creating social and physical environments supportive of a healthy lifestyle, increasing the use of preventive treatments, and improving systems response to acute CVD events. The effects of strategies were estimated as relative differences to the business-as-usual between 2019-2039. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis produced uncertainty intervals of interquartile ranges (IQR). FINDINGS The greatest reduction in CVD-related deaths was seen in strategies that improve systems response to acute CVD events (8.9%, IQR: 7.7-10.2%), yet they resulted in an increase in CVD-related hospitalisations due to future recurrent admissions (1.6%, IQR: 0.1-2.3%). This flow-on effect highlighted the importance of addressing underlying CVD risks. On the other hand, strategies targeting the broad environment that supports a healthy lifestyle were effective in reducing both hospitalisations (7.1%; IQR: 5.0-9.5%) and deaths (8.1% reduction; IQR: 7.1-8.9%). They also produced an economic net benefit of AU$43.3 billion (IQR: 37.7-48.7) using a societal perspective, largely driven by productivity gains. Overall, strategic planning to reduce the burden of CVD should consider the varying effects of strategies over time and beyond the health sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Q. Peng
- Decision Analytics, The SAX Institute, Sydney, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Kenny D. Lawson
- Adjunct, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark Heffernan
- Adjunct, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Dynamic Operations, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Sallie-Anne Pearson
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leonard Kritharides
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathy Trieu
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Quan Huynh
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tim Usherwood
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jo-An Occhipinti
- Decision Analytics, The SAX Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Computer Simulation & Advanced Research Technology (CSART), Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gumbie M, Olin E, Parkinson B, Bowman R, Cutler H. The cost-effectiveness of Cochlear implants in Swedish adults. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:319. [PMID: 33832467 PMCID: PMC8034197 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06271-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Research has shown unilateral cochlear implants (CIs) significantly improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in adults. However, only 13% of eligible Swedish adults currently use a unilateral CI. The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of unilateral CIs compared to a hearing aid for Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss. Methods A Markov model with a lifetime horizon and six-month cycle length was developed to estimate the benefits and costs of unilateral CIs from the Swedish health system perspective. A treatment pathway was developed through consultation with clinical experts to estimate resource use and costs. Unit costs were derived from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Health outcomes were reported in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Results Unilateral CIs for Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss are likely to be deemed cost-effective when compared to a hearing aid (SEK 140,474 per QALY gained). The results were most sensitive to the age when patients are implanted with a CI and the proportion of patients eligible for CIs after triage. Conclusions An increase in the prevalence of Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss is expected as the population ages. Earlier implantation of unilateral CIs improves the cost-effectiveness among people eligible for CIs. Unilateral CIs are an efficacious and cost-effective option to improve hearing and quality of life in Swedish adults with severe to profound hearing loss. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06271-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutsa Gumbie
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Level 1, 3 Innovation Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Emma Olin
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Level 1, 3 Innovation Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Level 1, 3 Innovation Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Ross Bowman
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Level 1, 3 Innovation Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Level 1, 3 Innovation Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hu W, Xu W, Si L, Wang C, Jiang Q, Wang L, Cutler H. Cost-effectiveness of the Da Qing diabetes prevention program: A modelling study. PLoS One 2021; 15:e0242962. [PMID: 33382746 PMCID: PMC7774969 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The Da Qing Diabetes Prevention program (DQDP) was a randomized lifestyle modification intervention conducted in 1986 for the prevention and control of type 2 diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. The current study estimated long-term cost-effectiveness of the program based on the health utilities from the Chinese population. Methods A Markov Monte Carlo model was developed to estimate the impact of the intervention from the healthcare system perspective. The analysis was run over 30-year and lifetime periods and costs were estimated respectively as health management service costs. Baseline characteristics and intervention effects were assessed from the DQDP. Utilities and costs were generated from relevant literature. The outcome measures were program cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention. Sensitivity analyses and threshold analyses were performed. Results Using a 30-year horizon, the intervention strategy was cost-saving and was associated with better health outcomes (increase of 0.74 QALYs per intervention participant). Using a lifetime horizon, the intervention strategy was cost-saving and was associated with additional 1.44 QALYs. Sensitivity analyses showed that the overall ICER was most strongly influenced by the hazard ratio of cardiovascular disease event. Conclusions The Da Qing lifestyle intervention in a Chinese population with impaired glucose tolerance is likely to translate into substantial economic value. It is cost-saving over a 30-year time and lifetime frame.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanxia Hu
- School of Health Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Wenhua Xu
- Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Lei Si
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cuilian Wang
- School of Health Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Qicheng Jiang
- School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Lidan Wang
- School of Health Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
- Centre for the Health Economic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sarkies MN, Francis-Auton E, Long JC, Partington A, Pomare C, Nguyen HM, Wu W, Westbrook J, Day RO, Levesque JF, Mitchell R, Rapport F, Cutler H, Tran Y, Clay-Williams R, Watson DE, Arnolda G, Hibbert PD, Lystad R, Mumford V, Leipnik G, Sutherland K, Hardwick R, Braithwaite J. Implementing large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives: a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e044049. [PMID: 33371049 PMCID: PMC7757496 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Value-based healthcare delivery models have emerged to address the unprecedented pressure on long-term health system performance and sustainability and to respond to the changing needs and expectations of patients. Implementing and scaling the benefits from these care delivery models to achieve large-system transformation are challenging and require consideration of complexity and context. Realist studies enable researchers to explore factors beyond 'what works' towards more nuanced understanding of 'what tends to work for whom under which circumstances'. This research proposes a realist study of the implementation approach for seven large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives in New South Wales, Australia, to elucidate how different implementation strategies and processes stimulate the uptake, adoption, fidelity and adherence of initiatives to achieve sustainable impacts across a variety of contexts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This exploratory, sequential, mixed methods realist study followed RAMESES II (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) reporting standards for realist studies. Stage 1 will formulate initial programme theories from review of existing literature, analysis of programme documents and qualitative interviews with programme designers, implementation support staff and evaluators. Stage 2 envisages testing and refining these hypothesised programme theories through qualitative interviews with local hospital network staff running initiatives, and analyses of quantitative data from the programme evaluation, hospital administrative systems and an implementation outcome survey. Stage 3 proposes to produce generalisable middle-range theories by synthesising data from context-mechanism-outcome configurations across initiatives. Qualitative data will be analysed retroductively and quantitative data will be analysed to identify relationships between the implementation strategies and processes, and implementation and programme outcomes. Mixed methods triangulation will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted by Macquarie University (Project ID 23816) and Hunter New England (Project ID 2020/ETH02186) Human Research Ethics Committees. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Results will be fed back to partner organisations and roundtable discussions with other health jurisdictions will be held, to share learnings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell N Sarkies
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emilie Francis-Auton
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janet C Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Partington
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chiara Pomare
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hoa Mi Nguyen
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wendy Wu
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard O Day
- Clinical Pharmacology, St Vincents Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jean-Frederic Levesque
- Bureau of Health Information, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diane E Watson
- Bureau of Health Information, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter D Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
- University of South Australia Division of Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Reidar Lystad
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Virginia Mumford
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Leipnik
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kim Sutherland
- New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bilgrami A, Sinha K, Cutler H. The impact of introducing a national scheme for paid parental leave on maternal mental health outcomes. Health Econ 2020; 29:1657-1681. [PMID: 32935432 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Paid maternity leave is an essential component of a progressive society. It can enhance postnatal health, improve mother and child wellbeing, and deliver better labor market outcomes for mothers. We evaluate the impact of the introduction of Australia's national Paid Parental Leave (PPL) scheme in 2011 and complementary Dad and Partner Pay (DAPP) in 2013 on maternal mental health. Using a sample of 1480 births to eligible, partnered women between 2004 and 2016 and examining a range of mental health outcomes from the Household, Income, andLabour Dynamics in Australia survey, we find depression likelihood reduced significantly in post-reform years. When focusing on post-DAPP years and women whose partners had concurrent access to DAPP, significant mental health improvements were found across a wider range of measures including the Mental Component Summary score and specific Short Form-36 items with a high sensitivity for detecting major depression. Subgroup analysis suggests significant improvements applied specifically to first-time mothers and mothers with employer-paid maternity leave and unpaid leave entitlements. These results suggest that an increase in PPL and DAPP entitlements for mothers without access to employer-paid and unpaid leave entitlements, particularly those in less secure employment, may further reduce postnatal depression and improve health equity in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anam Bilgrami
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kompal Sinha
- Department of Economics, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ochalek J, Wang H, Gu Y, Lomas J, Cutler H, Jin C. Informing a Cost-Effectiveness Threshold for Health Technology Assessment in China: A Marginal Productivity Approach. Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38:1319-1331. [PMID: 32856280 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00954-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health technology assessment has been increasingly used in China, having been legally mandated in 2019, to inform reimbursement decisions and price negotiations between the National Healthcare Security Administration and pharmaceutical companies around the price of new pharmaceuticals. The criteria currently used to judge cost effectiveness and inform pricing negotiations, 3 × GDP per capita, is based on the rule of thumb previously recommended by the World Health Organization rather than an estimate based on an empirical assessment of health opportunity costs. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to inform a cost-effectiveness threshold for health technology assessment in China that accounts for health opportunity cost. METHODS The elasticity of health outcomes with respect to health expenditure was estimated using variations across 30 provincial-level administrative divisions in 2017 controlling for a range of other factors and using an instrumental variable approach to account for endogeneity to assess robustness of results. The estimated elasticity was then used to calculate the cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted by variations in Chinese health expenditure at the margin. RESULTS The range estimated from this study, 27,923-52,247 (2017 RMB) (central estimate 37,446) per DALY averted or 47-88% of GDP per capita (central estimate 63%), shows that a cost per DALY averted cost-effectiveness threshold that reflects health opportunity costs is below 1 × GDP per capita. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the current cost-effectiveness threshold used in China is too high; continuing to use it risks decisions that reduce overall population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ochalek
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Haiyin Wang
- Shanghai Health Development Research Centre, Shanghai, 201199, China
| | - Yuanyuan Gu
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - James Lomas
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Chunlin Jin
- Shanghai Health Development Research Centre, Shanghai, 201199, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rosebrock H, Chen N, Tye M, Mackinnon A, Calear AL, Batterham PJ, Maple M, Rasmussen VM, Schroeder L, Cutler H, Shand F. Study protocol for a mixed methods prospective cohort study to explore experiences of care following a suicidal crisis in the Australian healthcare system. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033814. [PMID: 32801189 PMCID: PMC7430469 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For individuals presenting to the emergency department (ED) for a suicide attempt, the period after discharge from hospital is marked by heightened vulnerability for further suicide attempts. Effective care following a suicidal crisis has the potential to significantly decrease this risk. The current study aims to examine the impact of the LifeSpan multilevel suicide prevention model on experiences of care following a suicidal crisis. Perspectives from healthcare consumers (individuals who have presented to the ED following a suicidal crisis), carers, and health professionals will be explored. The LifeSpan model is currently being evaluated as a high-fidelity trial in four geographically defined regions in New South Wales, Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will use a mixed methods prospective cohort design. Quantitative data collection includes a structured survey, administered to healthcare consumers from LifeSpan sites and control sites. Two cohorts of healthcare consumers will be recruited 12 months apart with baseline assessment occurring within 18 months of the ED presentation, and follow-up 12 months after the initial assessment. Survey participants will be recruited online and through participating EDs, mental health organisations and aftercare services. Qualitative interview data from healthcare consumers, carers who have accompanied a loved one to the ED following a suicidal crisis and health professionals who provide care to people at risk of suicide will be collected concurrently with the recruitment of the first cohort of survey participants. Purposive and convenience sampling techniques will be used for recruitment of interview participants. The primary outcome for this study will be healthcare consumers' experiences of service provided at the ED. Analysis will be undertaken of the change over time within LifeSpan sites, as well as between LifeSpan sites and control sites, using mixed effects repeated measures models as principal means of data analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This research has been approved by the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/17/HNE/144). Results will be disseminated via conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12617000457347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicola Chen
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Tye
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Alison L Calear
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Philip J Batterham
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Myfanwy Maple
- School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Liz Schroeder
- Health Systems and Populations, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Health Systems and Populations, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fiona Shand
- Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shand F, Torok M, Cockayne N, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Mackinnon A, Martin D, Zbukvic I, Mok K, Chen N, McGillivray L, Phillips M, Cutler H, Draper B, Sara G, Christensen H. Protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial of the LifeSpan suicide prevention trial in four communities in New South Wales, Australia. Trials 2020; 21:332. [PMID: 32293516 PMCID: PMC7161184 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04262-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increasing investment in suicide prevention, Australian suicide rates have increased steadily in the past decade. In response to growing evidence for multicomponent intervention models for reducing suicide, the LifeSpan model has been developed as the first multicomponent, evidence-based, system-wide approach to suicide prevention in Australia. The LifeSpan model consists of nine evidence-based strategies. These include indicated, selective and universal interventions which are delivered simultaneously to community and healthcare systems over a 2-year implementation period. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the LifeSpan model in reducing suicide attempts and suicide deaths in four geographically defined regions in New South Wales, Australia. METHODS We outline the protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial. Following a 6-month transition phase, the trial sites will move to the 2-year active implementation phase in 4-monthly intervals with evaluation extending a minimum of 24 months after establishment of the full active period. Analysis will be undertaken of the change attributable to the invention across the four sites. The primary outcome for the study is the rate of attempted suicide in the regions involved. Rate of suicide deaths within each site is a secondary outcome. DISCUSSION If proven effective, the LifeSpan model for suicide prevention could be more widely delivered in Australian communities, providing a valuable new approach to tackle rising suicide rates. LifeSpan has the potential to significantly contribute to the mental health of Australians by improving help-seeking for suicide, facilitating early detection, and improving aftercare to reduce re-attempts. The findings from this research should also contribute to the evidence base for multilevel suicide prevention programs internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Register, ID: ACTRN12617000457347. Prospectively registered on 28 March 2017. https://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx#&&conditionCode=&dateOfRegistrationFrom=&interventionDescription=&interventionCodeOperator=OR&primarySponsorType=&gender=&distance=&postcode=&pageSize=20&ageGroup=&recruitmentCountryOperator=OR Protocol Version: 1.0, 31 May 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Shand
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Michelle Torok
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole Cockayne
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip J Batterham
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison L Calear
- Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Mackinnon
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dean Martin
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Isabel Zbukvic
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katherine Mok
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicola Chen
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lauren McGillivray
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Phillips
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Macquarie University Centre for Health Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Draper
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Grant Sara
- System Information and Analytics Branch, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Christensen
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dou L, Hu L, Zhang N, Cutler H, Wang Y, Li S. Factors Associated with Medication Adherence Among Patients with Severe Mental Disorders in China: A Propensity Score Matching Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2020; 14:1329-1339. [PMID: 32801663 PMCID: PMC7402865 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s255934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The 686 project provides free essential drugs and follow-up for poor SMD patients, with the purpose of improving patients' medication adherence and reducing the occurrence of dangerous behaviors. The objective of this research was to determine the factors that influence medication adherence in patients with severe mental disorders (SMD) and analyze whether the 686 program significantly improved patient medication adherence. METHODS This study was conducted among SMD patients in 686 project and non-project SMD patients in the same community in 11 cities in Shandong Province of China. The data collected included basic patient information and disease treatment information. Medication adherence was divided into good adherence and poor adherence. Propensity score matching (1:1 match) was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS One thousand two hundred ninety-two patients receiving free medication assistance policy (686 project group) and 1292 non-policy patients (control group) were analyzed. Patients who received the 686 project group had significantly better medication adherence than the non-policy group patients (92.6% vs.61.2%). Older age and consolidation period were associated with poor adherence, and education level was the positive determinant for adherence. CONCLUSION The 686 project could improve medication adherence to patients with SMD. Additional research will pay attention to medication adherence of patients who are elderly, in consolidation period and lower education levels. It should strengthen the guidance and supervision of patients' medication and strengthen the health education of family members and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Dou
- School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, Jinan250012, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lili Hu
- Shandong Mental Health Center, Jinan, 250000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Nan Zhang
- School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, Jinan250012, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan250117, People’s Republic of China
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, Australia
| | - Yan Wang
- Health Commission of Shandong Province, Jinan250014, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shunping Li
- School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, Jinan250012, People’s Republic of China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan250012, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Shunping Li School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, Wenhua Xi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong Province250012, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-131-8893-4998 Email
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gumbie M, Parkinson B, Cutler H, Gauld N, Mumford V. Is Reclassification of the Oral Contraceptive Pill from Prescription to Pharmacist-Only Cost Effective? Application of an Economic Evaluation Approach to Regulatory Decisions. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:1049-1064. [PMID: 31069781 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00804-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Unplanned pregnancies can lead to poorer maternal and child health outcomes. The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration committee rejected reclassifying a range of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) from prescription to pharmacist-only medicines in 2015, mainly based on safety concerns. Improving access to OCPs may encourage some women to use contraceptives or switch from other contraceptive methods. However, some adverse events may increase and some women may stop using condoms, increasing their risk of sexually transmitted infections. This study aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness of reclassifying OCPs from prescription to pharmacist-only. PERSPECTIVE Healthcare system. SETTING Australian primary care. METHODS A Markov model was used to synthesise data from a variety of sources. The model included all Australian women aged 15-49 years (N = 5,644,701). The time horizon was 35 years. Contraceptive use before reclassification was estimated using data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, while survey data informed use after reclassification. Health outcomes included pregnancies, pregnancy outcomes (live birth, miscarriage, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy and abortion), sexually transmitted infections, adverse events (venous thromboembolism, depression, myocardial infarction and stroke), ovarian cancer cases and quality-adjusted life-years. Costs included those related to general practitioner and specialist consultations, contraceptives and other medicines, pharmacist time, hospitalisations and adverse events. All costs were reported in 2016 Australian Dollars. A 5% discount rate was applied to health outcomes and costs. RESULTS Reclassifying OCPs resulted in 85.70 million quality-adjusted life-years experienced and costs of $46,910.14 million over 35 years, vs. 85.68 million quality-adjusted life-years experienced and costs of $50,274.95 million with OCPs remaining prescription-only. Thus, reclassifying OCPs was more effective and cost saving. However, a sensitivity analysis found that more research on the probability of pregnancy in women not using contraception and not trying to conceive is needed. CONCLUSION Reclassifying OCPs is likely to be considered cost effective by Australian decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutsa Gumbie
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Natalie Gauld
- School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - Virginia Mumford
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Parkinson B, Gumbie M, Cutler H, Gauld N, Mumford V, Haywood P. Cost-Effectiveness of Reclassifying Triptans in Australia: Application of an Economic Evaluation Approach to Regulatory Decisions. Value Health 2019; 22:293-302. [PMID: 30832967 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.2840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a common, chronic, disabling headache disorder. Triptans, used as an acute treatment for migraine, are available via prescription in Australia. An Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) committee rejected reclassifying sumatriptan and zolmitriptan from prescription medicine to pharmacist-only between 2005 and 2009, largely on the basis of concerns about patient risk. Nevertheless, pharmacist-only triptans may reduce migraine duration and free up healthcare resources. OBJECTIVES To estimate the cost-effectiveness of reclassifying triptans from prescription-only to pharmacist-only in Australia. METHODS The study design included decision-analytic modeling combining data from various sources. Behavior before and after reclassification was estimated using medical practitioner and patient surveys and also administrative data. Health outcomes included migraine frequency and duration as well as adverse events (AEs) discussed by the TGA committee. Efficacy and AEs were estimated using randomized controlled trials and observational studies. RESULTS Reclassifying triptans will reduce migraine duration but increase AEs. This will result in 337 quality-adjusted life-years gained at an increased cost of A$5.9 million over 10 years for all Australian adults older than 15 years (19.6 million). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be A$17 412/quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is likely to be considered cost-effective by Australian decision makers. Serotonin syndrome, a key concern of the TGA committee, had little impact on the results. Further research is needed regarding pharmacist-only triptan use by migraineurs currently using over-the-counter medicines and by nonmigraineurs, the efficacy of triptans, and the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular AEs and chronic headaches with triptans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonny Parkinson
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Mutsa Gumbie
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Gauld
- School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Virginia Mumford
- Australian Institute for Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Haywood
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gordois A, Cutler H, Pezzullo L, Gordon K, Cruess A, Winyard S, Hamilton W, Chua K. An estimation of the worldwide economic and health burden of visual impairment. Glob Public Health 2011; 7:465-81. [PMID: 22136197 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2011.634815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to provide a rigorous estimate of the worldwide costs of visual impairment (VI), and the associated health burden. The study used a prevalence-based model. Prevalence rates for mild VI (visual acuity (VA) worse than 6/12 but not worse than 6/18), moderate VI (VA worse than 6/18 but not worse than 6/60) and blindness (VA worse than 6/60) were applied to population forecasts for each World Health Organisation (WHO) subregion. The limited available country cost data were extrapolated between subregions using economic and population health indicators. Age and gender subgroup population numbers were derived from United Nations' data. Costs and the health burden of VI were estimated for each world subregion using published disease prevalence rates, health care expenditures and other economic data. The study includes direct health care costs, indirect costs and the health burden of VI. The total cost of VI globally was estimated at $3 trillion in 2010, of which $2.3 trillion was direct health costs. This burden is projected to increase by approximately 20% by 2020. VI is associated with a considerable disease burden. Unless steps are taken to reduce prevalence through prevention and treatment, this burden will increase alongside global population growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Gordois
- Access Economics Pty Ltd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tikoo A, Cutler H, Lo SH, Chen LB, Maruta H. Treatment of Ras-induced cancers by the F-actin cappers tensin and chaetoglobosin K, in combination with the caspase-1 inhibitor N1445. Cancer J Sci Am 1999; 5:293-300. [PMID: 10526670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED For transforming normal fibroblasts to malignant cells, oncogenic Ras mutants such as v-Ha-ras require Rho family GTPases (Rho, Rac, and CDC42) that are responsible for controlling actin-cytoskeleton organization. Ras activates Rac through a PI-3 kinase-mediated pathway. Rac causes uncapping of actin filaments (F-actin) at the plus-ends, through phosphatidylinositol 4,5 bisphosphate (PIP2), and eventually induces membrane ruffling. Several distinct F-actin/PIP2-binding proteins, such as gelsolin, which severs and caps the plus-ends of actin filaments, or HS1, which cross-links actin filaments, have been shown to suppress v-Ha-Ras-induced malignant transformation when they are overexpressed. Interestingly, an F-actin cross-linking drug (photosensitizer) called MKT-077 suppresses Ras transformation. Thus, an F-actin capping/severing drug might also have an anticancer potential. PURPOSE This study was conducted to determine first whether Ras-induced malignant phenotype (anchorage-independent growth) is suppressed by overexpression of the gene encoding a large plus-end F-actin capping protein called tensin and second to test the anti-Ras potential of a unique fungal antibiotic (small compound) called chaetoglobosin K (CK) that also caps the plus-ends of actin filaments. METHODS AND RESULTS DNA transfection with a retroviral vector carrying the tensin cDNA was used to overexpress tensin in v-Ha-Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells. All stable tensin transfectants rarely formed colonies in soft agar, indicating that tensin suppresses the anchorage-independent growth. The anti-Ras action of CK was determined by incubating the Ras-transformants in the presence of CK in soft agar. Two microM CK almost completely inhibited their colony formation, indicating that CK also suppresses the malignant phenotype. However, unlike tensin, CK causes an apoptosis of Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells and, less effectively, of normal NIH 3T3 cells, indicating that CK has an F-actin capping-independent side effect(s). CK-induced apoptosis is at least in part caused by CK-induced inhibition of the kinase PKB/AKT. However, a specific ICE/caspase-1 inhibitor called N1445 completely abolished the CK-induced apoptosis by reactivating PKB, but without affecting the CK-induced suppression of Ras transformation. CONCLUSIONS Like the F-actin cross-linking drug MKT-077, the F-actin capping drug CK may be useful for the treatment of Ras-associated cancers if it is combined with the ICE inhibitor N1445, which abolishes the side effect of CK. Our observations that two distinct F-actin capping molecules (i.e., tensin and CK) suppress Ras-induced malignant phenotype strongly suggest, if not prove, that capping of actin filaments at the plus-ends alone is sufficient to block one of the Ras signaling pathways essential for its oncogenicity. This notion is compatible with the fact that Ras induces the uncapping of actin filaments at the plus-ends through the Rac/PIP2 pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tikoo
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Burgess E, Lewanczuk R, Bolli P, Chockalingam A, Cutler H, Taylor G, Hamet P. Lifestyle modifications to prevent and control hypertension. 6. Recommendations on potassium, magnesium and calcium. Canadian Hypertension Society, Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control at Health Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. CMAJ 1999; 160:S35-45. [PMID: 10333852 PMCID: PMC1230338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations on the consumption, through diet, and supplementation of the cations potassium, magnesium and calcium for the prevention and treatment of hypertension in otherwise healthy adults (except pregnant women). OPTIONS Dietary supplementation with cations has been suggested as an alternative or adjunctive therapy to antihypertensive medications. Other options include other nonpharmacologic treatments for hypertension. OUTCOMES The health outcomes considered were changes in blood pressure and in morbidity and mortality rates. Because of insufficient evidence, no economic outcomes were considered. EVIDENCE A MEDLINE search was conducted for the period 1966-1996 with the terms hypertension and potassium, magnesium and calcium. Reports of trials, meta-analyses and review articles were obtained. Other relevant evidence was obtained from the reference lists of articles identified, from the personal files of the authors and through contacts with experts. The articles were reviewed, classified according to study design, and graded according to the level of evidence. VALUES A high value was placed on the avoidance of cardiovascular morbidity and premature death caused by untreated hypertension. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS The weight of the evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates that increasing intake of or supplementing the diet with potassium, magnesium or calcium is not associated with prevention of hypertension, nor is it effective in reducing high blood pressure. Potassium supplementation may be effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with hypokalemia during diuretic therapy. RECOMMENDATIONS For the prevention of hypertension, the following recommendations are made: (1) The daily dietary intake of potassium should be 60 mmol or more, because this level of intake has been associated with a reduced risk of stroke-related mortality. (2) For normotensive people obtaining on average 60 mmol of potassium daily through dietary intake, potassium supplementation is not recommended as a means of preventing an increase in blood pressure. (3) For normotensive people, magnesium supplementation is not recommended as a means of preventing an increase in blood pressure. (4) For normotensive people, calcium supplementation above the recommended daily intake is not recommended as a means of preventing an increase in blood pressure. For the treatment of hypertension, the following recommendations are made. (5) Potassium supplementation above the recommended daily dietary intake of 60 mmol is not recommended as a treatment for hypertension. (6) Magnesium supplementation is not recommended as a treatment for hypertension. (7) Calcium supplementation above the recommended daily dietary intake is not recommended as a treatment for hypertension. VALIDATION These guidelines are consistent with the results of meta-analyses and recommendations made by other organizations. They have not been clinically tested. SPONSORS The Canadian Hypertension Society, the Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control, the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control at Health Canada, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Burgess
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alta
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fodor G, Cutler H, Irvine J, Ramsden V, Tremblay G, Chockalingam A. Adherence to non-pharmacologic therapy for hypertension: problems and solutions. Can J Public Health 1999. [PMID: 9813920 DOI: 10.1007/bf03404493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The efficacy of a number of non-pharmacologic interventions in the therapy of primary hypertension has been firmly established. Most prominently, weight reduction, sodium restriction, and alcohol restriction have significant effects on lowering blood pressure. Increased physical activity contributes to management of hypertensive patients in a variety of ways: apart from having a direct impact on blood pressure level, it is an important supportive factor in a weight-reducing regime. The success in applying these non-pharmacologic measures in standard patient population is rather limited. A salient example is the lack of success in weight reduction. Reduction of sodium in the diet is somewhat more successful, however, the problem is that most of the salt intake is non-discretionary. Adherence to physical activity regimes is in the range of what has been observed in pharmacologic therapy. Research and experience in the past few years are providing a better understanding of the factors determining compliance with prescribed therapeutical regimes. Further research is needed to develop innovative strategies for providing efficacious non-pharmacologic measures to hypertensive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Fodor
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute Prevention and Rehabilitation Centre, ON.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chockalingam A, Bacher M, Campbell N, Cutler H, Drover A, Feldman R, Fodor G, Irvine J, Ramsden V, Thivierge R, Tremblay G. Adherence to management of high blood pressure: recommendations of the Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control. Can J Public Health 1998; 89:I5-11. [PMID: 9813919 PMCID: PMC6990294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Adherence or compliance, in the context of medical treatment, refers to how well a patient follows and sticks to the management plan developed with her/his health care provider, which may include pharmacologic agents as well as changes in lifestyle. Adherence is of great concern in asymptomatic conditions such as hypertension, where lack of control may have serious ramifications including end organ damage and premature mortality. To address this issue, the Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control established a national Advisory Committee on Adherence to the Management of High Blood Pressure. The Advisory Committee consisted of 11 members from different disciplines of health care providers. The Committee reviewed all evidences to date and drew up four practical recommendations with respect to patient, provider and environment. Based on Canadian Task Force on Periodic Health Examination's guidelines, all four recommendations can be classified as 'level C' with a quality of evidence of II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Chockalingam
- Adult Health Division, HPPB, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cutler H, Goldman GS. Transportation. Bugaboo of scrap iron recycling. Environ Sci Technol 1973; 7:408-411. [PMID: 22283531 DOI: 10.1021/es60077a010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|