1
|
Comparison of long-term outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant versus simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant. Sci Rep 2023; 13:49. [PMID: 36593273 PMCID: PMC9807579 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27203-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant (SPLK) has certain advantages over conventional simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) and may be beneficial for overcoming the paucity of organs needed for diabetic patients requiring transplant. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either SPK (n = 149) or SPLK (n = 46) in terms of pre- and post-transplantation variables, development of de novo DSA, occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and graft survival rates. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the SPK and SPLK groups except for the shorter cold ischemic time of kidney grafts, shorter duration of diabetes, older age of pancreas graft-donors, and younger age of kidney graft-donors in the SPLK group. Our results showed that the death-censored pancreas graft survival rate was lower in the SPLK group. In addition, the incidence of BPAR of the pancreas graft was higher in the SPLK group. There was no significant difference in the presence of de novo DSA and the rates of kidney graft failure, kidney BPAR, and mortality. Our results show that SPLK can be considered an alternative option for SPK although higher incidences of BPAR and graft failure of pancreas after SPLK need to be overcome.
Collapse
|
2
|
Callaghan CJ, Ibrahim M, Counter C, Casey J, Friend PJ, Watson CJE, Karydis N. Outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors: A UK registry analysis. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3673-3683. [PMID: 33870619 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
There are concerns that simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors have a higher risk of graft failure than those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. A UK registry analysis of SPK transplants between 2005 and 2018 was performed. Pancreas survivals of those receiving organs from DCD or DBD donors were compared. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and to identify factors associated with pancreas graft loss. A total of 2228 SPK transplants were implanted; 403 (18.1%) were from DCD donors. DCD donors were generally younger, slimmer, less likely to have stroke as a cause of death, with lower terminal creatinines and shorter pancreas cold ischemic times than DBD donors. Median (IQR) follow-up was 4.2 (1.6-8.1) years. On univariable analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival between the two donor types (79.5% versus 80.4%; p = .86). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year pancreas graft loss between transplants from DCD (n = 343) and DBD (n = 1492) donors (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.76-1.23; p = .12). The findings from this study support the increased use of SPK transplants from DCD donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Callaghan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Claire Counter
- Statistics and Clinical Studies, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - John Casey
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter J Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, and Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, The NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Papageorge CM, Bolognese AC, Odorico JS. Expanding access to pancreas transplantation for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:390-396. [PMID: 34148982 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The vast majority of cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the United States are classified as type 2 DM (T2DM). Restrictive listing criteria and uncertainty regarding outcomes have historically limited access to pancreas transplantation for individuals with T2DM, although it has been used with success in patients with type 1 DM (T1DM). This review summarizes several recent studies that have sought to clarify the indications, appropriate patient selection, and outcomes of pancreas transplantation in the setting of T2DM. RECENT FINDINGS Pancreas transplants have increased over the last few years, largely due to an increase in listings for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) in patients with T2DM. Retrospective data demonstrate similar patient and allograft survival in patients with T1DM and T2DM undergoing SPK, and improved outcomes in patients with T2DM after SPK compared to those receiving a kidney transplant alone, although these studies are often confounded by selection biases. Patient selection for pancreas transplant has traditionally focused on body mass index, pretransplant insulin requirements, and fasting C-peptide, and the categorization of patients to T1DM or T2DM. Emerging data suggests this practice is inadvertently and unnecessarily restrictive. SUMMARY There is a growing body of evidence to support increasing consideration of pancreas transplantation in patients with T2DM, with support for equivalent patient and graft survival and glycemic control. Future prospective studies are indicated to better evaluate the role of preoperative patient factors in selection for pancreas transplantation and to explore long-term outcomes in patients with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Papageorge
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
- UW Health Transplant Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Alexandra C Bolognese
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
- UW Health Transplant Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
- UW Health Transplant Center, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parajuli S, Mandelbrot DA. One more time, emphasizing the advantage of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes and end‐stage renal disease. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1384-1386. [PMID: 32620051 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Didier A. Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parajuli S, Swanson KJ, Patel R, Astor BC, Aziz F, Garg N, Mohamed M, Al‐Qaoud T, Redfield R, Djamali A, Kaufman D, Odorico J, Mandelbrot DA. Outcomes of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants based on preemptive transplant compared to those who were on dialysis before transplant – a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1106-1115. [PMID: 32479673 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandesh Parajuli
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Kurtis J. Swanson
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Ravi Patel
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Brad C. Astor
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Fahad Aziz
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Neetika Garg
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Maha Mohamed
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Talal Al‐Qaoud
- Division of Transplant Surgery University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Robert Redfield
- Division of Transplant Surgery University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
- Division of Transplant Surgery University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Dixon Kaufman
- Division of Transplant Surgery University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Jon Odorico
- Division of Transplant Surgery University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| | - Didier A. Mandelbrot
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alhamad T, Kunjal R, Wellen J, Brennan DC, Wiseman A, Ruano K, Hicks V, Wang M, Schnitzler MA, Chang SH, Lentine KL. Three-month pancreas graft function significantly influences survival following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in type 2 diabetes patients. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:788-796. [PMID: 31553823 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Successful simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) improves quality-of-life and prolongs kidney allograft and patient survival in type-1 diabetic (T1DM) patients. However, the use of SPK in type-2 diabetic (T2DM) patients remains limited. We examined a national transplant registry for 35 849 T2DM kidney disease patients who received transplant between 2000 and 2016 and survived the first 3 months with a functioning kidney, and categorized as: deceased-donor kidney transplant alone (DD-KA, 68%), living-donor kidney transplant alone (LD-KA, 30%), or SPK (2%). Among SPK recipients, 6% had pancreas allograft failure within 3 months (SPK,P-) and 94% had a functional pancreas (SPK,P+). Associations of transplant type with kidney allograft failure and death (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 95%LCL aHR95%UCL ), over follow-up through December 2018, were quantified by multivariable inverse probability of treatment weighted survival analyses. SPK recipients had better kidney graft and patient survival than LD-KA or DD-KA recipients. Compared to SPK,P+, DD-KA, or LD-KA recipients had significantly higher risk of kidney allograft failure (DD-KA: aHR 1.53 2.203.17 ; LD-KA: aHR 1.29 1.872.71 ) and death (DD-KA: aHR 2.12 3.255.00 ; LD-KA: aHR 1.54 2.353.59 ). SPK,P- recipients had significantly higher risk of death (aHR 1.68 3.306.50 ). Similar to T1DM, T2DM patients with SPK have a survival benefit compared to those with kidney transplant alone, but this benefit depends upon successful early pancreas function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek Alhamad
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Transplant Epidemiology Research Collaboration (TERC), Institute of Public Health, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Ryan Kunjal
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jason Wellen
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel C Brennan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexander Wiseman
- Division of Nephrology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Kricia Ruano
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Veronica Hicks
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mei Wang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mark A Schnitzler
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Su-Hsin Chang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Venkatanarasimhamoorthy VS, Barlow AD. Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Versus Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Alone: an Outcome-Driven Choice? Curr Diab Rep 2018; 18:67. [PMID: 30030637 PMCID: PMC6061188 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-018-1039-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The choice of optimum transplant in a patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and chronic kidney disease stage V (CKD V) is not clear. The purpose of this review was to investigate this in more detail-in particular the choice between a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) and living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), including recent evidence, to aid clinicians and their patients in making an informed choice in their care. RECENT FINDINGS Analyses of large databases have recently shown SPKT to have better survival rates than a LDKT in the long-term, despite an early increase in morbidity and mortality in SPKT recipients. This survival advantage has only been shown in those SPKT recipients with a functioning pancreas and not those who had early pancreas graft loss. The choice of SPKT or LDKT should not be based on patient and graft survival outcomes alone. Individual patient circumstances, preferences, and comorbidities, among other factors should form an important part of the decision-making process. In general, an SPKT should be considered in those patients not on dialysis and LDKT in those nearing or already on dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam D Barlow
- Consultant Transplant Surgeon, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Techniques of pancreas graft salvage/indications for allograft pancreatectomy. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2017; 21:405-11. [PMID: 27058314 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite improvements in pancreas allograft outcome, graft complications remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. This review analyses the issues involved in the management of conditions that may require graft pancreatectomy, including the indications and techniques for graft salvage. RECENT FINDINGS With early recognition of graft complications, liberal use of radiological interventions, improved infection control, access to critical care and innovative surgical techniques, graft salvage is now feasible in many circumstances where graft pancreatectomy would previously have been necessary. SUMMARY The outcome of pancreas transplantation continues to improve with advances in the management of graft-threatening complications.
Collapse
|
9
|
Clinical and Economic Consequences of Early Cancer After Kidney Transplantation in Contemporary Practice. Transplantation 2017; 101:858-866. [PMID: 27490413 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current clinical and economic consequences of cancer after kidney transplantation are incompletely defined. METHODS We examined United States Renal Data System records of Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients in 2000 to 2011 to determine clinical and economic impacts of cancer diagnosed within the first 3 years posttransplantation. Cancer diagnoses were identified using Medicare billing codes and categorized as nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), viral-linked and "other" cancers. Associations of cancers with mortality and graft loss were estimated by time-varying Cox regression. Impacts of cancer diagnoses on inpatient and outpatient costs within each year were quantified by multivariate linear regression modeling. RESULTS Among 67 157 recipients, by 3 years posttransplant, NMSC was diagnosed in 5.7%, viral-linked cancer in 1.9%, and "other" cancers in 6.3%. Viral-linked cancer was associated with more than 3-fold increased risk in subsequent mortality until the third transplant anniversary, and nearly twice the mortality risk after year 3. "Other" cancers had similar associations with death and graft loss, whereas NMSC was associated with 33% higher mortality beyond the third year posttransplant. Viral-linked cancer had the largest inpatient and outpatient cost impacts per case, followed by "other" cancer, whereas NMSC impacted only outpatient costs. Care of new cancer diagnoses was generally more costly than care of previously established diagnoses. Cancer accounted for 3% to 5.5% of total inpatient Medicare expenditures and 1.5% to 3.3% of outpatient expenditures in the first 3 years posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS Early posttransplant malignancy is an expensive and morbid condition that warrants attention in efforts to improve pretransplant screening and management protocols before and after transplant.
Collapse
|
10
|
Havrdova T, Boucek P, Saudek F, Voska L, Lodererova A, Üçeyler N, Vondrova H, Skibova J, Lipar K, Sommer C. Severe Epidermal Nerve Fiber Loss in Diabetic Neuropathy Is Not Reversed by Long-Term Normoglycemia After Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:2196-201. [PMID: 26751140 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Revised: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Whether nerve fiber loss, a prominent feature of advanced diabetic neuropathy, can be reversed by reestablishment of normal glucose control remains questionable. We present 8-year follow-up data on epidermal nerve fiber (ENF) density and neurological function in patients with type 1 diabetes after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) with long-term normoglycemia. Distal thigh skin biopsies with ENF counts, vibration perception thresholds (VPTs), autonomic function testing (AFT) and electrophysiological examinations were performed at time of SPK and 2.5 and 8 years after SPK in 12 patients with type 1 diabetes. In comparison to controls, baseline ENF density, VPT and AFT results of patients indicated severe neuropathy. At follow-up, all SPK recipients were insulin independent with excellent glycemic control and kidney graft function; however, the severe ENF depletion present at baseline had not improved, with total ENF absence in 11 patients at 8-year follow-up. Similarly, no amelioration occurred in the VPT and AFT results. Numerical improvement was seen in some electrophysiological parameters; however, statistical significance was achieved only in median motor nerve conduction velocity. ENF loss and functional deficits in advanced diabetic peripheral neuropathy are rarely reversible, even by long-term normoglycemia, which underscores the importance of neuropathy prevention by early optimal glycemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Havrdova
- Diabetes and Transplant Centers, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Boucek
- Diabetes and Transplant Centers, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - F Saudek
- Diabetes and Transplant Centers, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Voska
- Diabetes and Transplant Centers, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Lodererova
- Diabetes and Transplant Centers, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Üçeyler
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - H Vondrova
- Department of Neurology, Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Skibova
- Diabetes and Transplant Centers, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - K Lipar
- Diabetes and Transplant Centers, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C Sommer
- Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lindahl JP, Hartmann A, Aakhus S, Endresen K, Midtvedt K, Holdaas H, Leivestad T, Horneland R, Øyen O, Jenssen T. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetic patients after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation compared with living donor kidney transplantation. Diabetologia 2016; 59:844-52. [PMID: 26713324 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-015-3853-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly coronary artery disease (CAD), is high in type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We aimed to determine whether normoglycaemia, as achieved by successful simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation, could improve long-term outcomes compared with living donor kidney-alone (LDK) transplantation. METHODS We studied 486 type 1 diabetic patients with ESRD who underwent a first SPK (n = 256) or LDK (n = 230) transplant between 1983 and 2012 and were followed to the end of 2014. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Renal Registry and hospital records. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariate Cox regression, with correction for recipient, donor and transplant factors, were used to examine potential associations between transplant type and all-cause and CVD- and CAD-related mortality. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 7.9 years (interquartile range 4.3, 12.9). The adjusted HR for CVD-related deaths in SPK recipients compared with LDK recipients was 0.63 (95% CI 0.40, 0.99; p = 0.047), while the HRs for all-cause and CAD-related mortality were 0.81 (95% CI 0.57, 1.16; p = 0.25) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.36, 1.12; p = 0.12), respectively. Compared with the LDK group, SPK recipients were younger and received grafts from younger donors. Cardiovascular mortality was higher in patients transplanted between 1983 and 1999 compared with those who received their grafts in subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION In patients with type 1 diabetes and ESRD, SPK transplantation was associated with reduced long-term cardiovascular mortality compared with LDK transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jørn P Lindahl
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Anders Hartmann
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Svend Aakhus
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Endresen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karsten Midtvedt
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hallvard Holdaas
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torbjørn Leivestad
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rune Horneland
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Øyen
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trond Jenssen
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
- Metabolic and Renal Research Group, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Naik AS, Dharnidharka VR, Schnitzler MA, Brennan DC, Segev DL, Axelrod D, Xiao H, Kucirka L, Chen J, Lentine KL. Clinical and economic consequences of first-year urinary tract infections, sepsis, and pneumonia in contemporary kidney transplantation practice. Transpl Int 2015; 29:241-52. [PMID: 26563524 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
We examined United States Renal Data System registry records for Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients in 2000-2011 to study the clinical and cost impacts of urinary tract infections (UTI), pneumonia, and sepsis in the first year post-transplant among a contemporary, national cohort. Infections were identified by billing diagnostic codes. Among 60 702 recipients, 45% experienced at least one study infection in the first year post-transplant, including UTI in 32%, pneumonia in 13%, and sepsis in 12%. Older recipient age, female sex, diabetic kidney failure, nonstandard criteria organs, sirolimus-based immunosuppression, and steroids at discharge were associated with increased risk of first-year infections. By time-varying, multivariate Cox regression, all study infections predicted increased first-year mortality, ranging from 41% (aHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.25-1.56) for UTI alone, 6- to 12-fold risk for pneumonia or sepsis alone, to 34-fold risk (aHR 34.38, 95% CI 30.35-38.95) for those with all three infections. Infections also significantly increased first-year costs, from $17 691 (standard error (SE) $591) marginal cost increase for UTI alone, to approximately $40 000-$50 000 (SE $1054-1238) for pneumonia or sepsis alone, to $134 773 (SE $1876) for those with UTI, pneumonia, and sepsis. Clinical and economic impacts persisted in years 2-3 post-transplant. Early infections reflect important targets for management protocols to improve post-transplant outcomes and reduce costs of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit S Naik
- Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Vikas R Dharnidharka
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mark A Schnitzler
- Saint Louis University Center for Transplant Research, Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniel C Brennan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David Axelrod
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Huiling Xiao
- Saint Louis University Center for Transplant Research, Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lauren Kucirka
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jiajing Chen
- Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Transplant Research, Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oberhuber R, Ritschl P, Fabritius C, Nguyen AV, Hermann M, Obrist P, Werner ER, Maglione M, Flörchinger B, Ebner S, Resch T, Pratschke J, Kotsch K. Treatment with tetrahydrobiopterin overcomes brain death-associated injury in a murine model of pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:2865-76. [PMID: 26104062 PMCID: PMC4744967 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2014] [Revised: 04/05/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Brain death (BD) has been associated with an immunological priming of donor organs and is thought to exacerbate ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). Recently, we showed that the essential nitric oxide synthase co-factor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) abrogates IRI following experimental pancreas transplantation. We therefore studied the effects of BD in a murine model of syngeneic pancreas transplantation and tested the therapeutic potential of BH4 treatment. Compared with sham-operated controls, donor BD resulted in intragraft inflammation reflected by induced IL-1ß, IL-6, VCAM-1, and P-selectin mRNA expression levels and impaired microcirculation after reperfusion (p < 0.05), whereas pretreatment of the BD donor with BH4 significantly improved microcirculation after reperfusion (p < 0.05). Moreover, BD had a devastating impact on cell viability, whereas BH4-treated grafts showed a significantly higher percentage of viable cells (p < 0.001). Early parenchymal damage in pancreatic grafts was significantly more pronounced in organs from BD donors than from sham or non-BD donors (p < 0.05), but BH4 pretreatment significantly ameliorated necrotic lesions in BD organs (p < 0.05). Pretreatment of the BD donor with BH4 resulted in significant recipient survival (p < 0.05). Our data provide novel insights into the impact of BD on pancreatic isografts, further demonstrating the potential of donor pretreatment strategies including BH4 for preventing BD-associated injury after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Oberhuber
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - P Ritschl
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - C Fabritius
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - A-V Nguyen
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Hermann
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - P Obrist
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Zams, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - E R Werner
- Division of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Maglione
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - B Flörchinger
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - S Ebner
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - T Resch
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - J Pratschke
- Department of Visceral, Abdominal and Transplantation Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Kotsch
- Center for Operative Medicine, Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Willicombe M, Kumar N, Goodall D, Clarke C, McLean AG, Power A, Taube D. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of stroke post-transplantation in patients receiving a steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol. Clin Transplant 2014; 29:18-25. [PMID: 25307366 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Corticosteroid use after transplantation is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events and death. Cerebrovascular disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality post-renal transplantation; however, a dedicated analysis of cerebrovascular disease in recipients of a steroid sparing protocol has not been reported. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of CVA in transplant recipients receiving a steroid sparing protocol. We retrospectively analyzed 1237 patients who received a kidney alone or a simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant. Fifty-six of 1237 (4.53%) patients had a CVA post-transplant. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the CVA group compared with the non-CVA group, OR: 3.4 (1.7-7.0), p < 0.001. Factors found to be associated with increased risk of CVA by multivariate analysis were older age, HR: 1.07 (1.04-1.09), p < 0.001; diabetes at the time of transplantation, HR: 2.83 (1.42-5.64), p = 0.003; corticosteroid use pre-transplant, HR: 3.27 (1.29-8.27), p = 0.013 and recipients of a SPK, HR: 4.03 (1.85-8.79), p < 0.001. This study has identified subgroups of patients who are at increased risk of CVA post-transplant in patients otherwise receiving a steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Willicombe
- Imperial College Kidney and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mittal S, Gough SCL. Pancreas transplantation: a treatment option for people with diabetes. Diabet Med 2014; 31:512-21. [PMID: 24313883 DOI: 10.1111/dme.12373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2013] [Revised: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 11/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Since the first pancreas transplants in the early 1960s, whole-organ pancreas transplantation, either alone or combined with kidney transplantation, has become commonplace in many countries around the world. Whole-organ pancreas transplantation is available in the UK, with ~200 transplants currently carried out per year. Patient survival and pancreas graft outcome rates are now similar to other solid organ transplant programmes, with high rates of long-term insulin independence. In the present review, we will discuss whole-pancreas transplantation as a treatment for diabetes, focusing on indications for transplantation, the nature of the procedure performed, graft survival rates and the consequences of pancreas transplantation on metabolic variables and the progression of diabetes-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mittal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Oxford, UK; Oxford Centre of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wiseman AC. Kidney transplant options for the diabetic patient. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2013; 27:112-6. [PMID: 23927899 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2013] [Revised: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 07/02/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
For patients with diabetes and progressive chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is the optimal mode of renal replacement therapy, with or without a pancreas transplant. Additional benefits of pancreas transplant have become increasingly apparent due to advances in surgical outcomes and immunosuppression, and may be reasonably considered even in selected patients with type 2 diabetes. In general, pancreas transplantation is associated with long-term survival advantages despite an increased short-term morbidity and mortality risk. This is true with simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation or pancreas after kidney transplantation compared to kidney transplantation alone, regardless of kidney donor status (living or deceased). Individual patient preferences, comorbidities, and expected waiting time influence selection of transplant modality, rather than a clear survival benefit of one strategy versus the other. In selected patients with type 2 diabetes, recent outcomes data support cautious utilization of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation when a living kidney donor transplant is not an option. The purpose of this review is to summarize current data regarding kidney and pancreas transplant treatment options in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes and the influence of current organ allocation policies to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of each of these strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C Wiseman
- Transplant Center, University of Colorado Denver, Mail Stop F749, AOP 7089, 1635 North Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Follow-up of secondary diabetic complications after pancreas transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2013; 18:102-10. [PMID: 23283247 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32835c28c5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Successful pancreas transplantation restores physiologic glycemic and metabolic control. Its effects on overall patient survival (especially for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation) are clear-cut. We herein review the available literature to define the impact of pancreas transplantation on chronic complications of diabetes mellitus. RECENT FINDINGS With longer-term follow-up, wider patient populations, and more accurate investigational tools (clinical and functional tests, noninvasive imaging, histology, and molecular biology), growing data show that successful pancreas transplantation may slow the progression, stabilize, and even favor the regression of secondary complications of diabetes, both microvascular and macrovascular, in a relevant proportion of recipients. SUMMARY Patients who are referred for pancreas transplantation usually suffer from advanced chronic complications of diabetes, which have classically been deemed irreversible. A successful pancreas transplantation is often able to slow the progression, stabilize, and even reverse many microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Growing clinical evidence shows that the expected natural history of long-term diabetic complications can be significantly modified by successful pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
|
18
|
The implications of acute rejection for allograft survival in contemporary U.S. kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2012; 94:369-76. [PMID: 22836133 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e318259407f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the frequency and clinical impact of acute rejection (AR) in contemporary U.S. kidney transplantation. METHODS Data for Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients in 2000 to 2007 (n=48,179) were drawn from the United States Renal Data System. AR events were ascertained from Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network reports. AR was subclassified as antibody (Ab)-treated AR or other management (non-Ab-treated AR). Associations of AR with subsequent all-cause graft loss were estimated with time-varying Cox regression. Covariates included recipient, donor, and transplant factors in the United Network for Organ Sharing Kidney Allocation Review Committee survival model. RESULTS The frequencies of non-Ab-treated AR per 100 graft-years at risk among standard criteria donor recipients over the first 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after transplantation were 9.93, 8.43, 5.71, and 4.70, respectively. Non-Ab-treated AR was consistently more than twice as common as Ab-treated AR by risk period and donor type. Development of Ab-treated AR predicted a greater risk of graft loss than non-Ab-treated AR. The relative risk for graft loss from Ab-treated AR continuously increased with later timing of AR after transplantation, whereas risk associated with non-Ab-treated AR peaked for events reported in months 13 to 24 after kidney transplantation. Regardless of the diagnosis time, the relative risk of graft loss was higher in the first 89 days after a given AR report compared with 90 days and beyond. CONCLUSIONS AR events recognized later after transplantation have more serious graft loss implications, especially within the first 89 days after AR reporting. This observation may reflect reduced intensity of monitoring, delays in diagnosis, or clinicopathologic features of late AR.
Collapse
|
19
|
Acute cellular rejection in intra-abdominal solid organ allografts – immunology under the light microscope. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mpdhp.2012.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
20
|
Lamattina J, Sollinger H, Becker Y, Mezrich J, Pirsch J, Odorico J. Long-term pancreatic allograft survival after renal retransplantation in prior simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients. Am J Transplant 2012; 12:937-46. [PMID: 22233437 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03916.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Over a 23-year period, our center performed 82 renal retransplants in prior simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients with functioning pancreatic allografts. All patients were insulin-independent at retransplantation. We aimed to quantify the risk of returning to insulin therapy and to identify factors that predispose patients to pancreatic allograft failure after renal retransplantation. Among these 82 patients, pancreatic allograft survival after renal retransplantation was 78%, 49% and 40% at 1, 5 and 10 years. When analyzing risk factors, we unexpectedly found no clear relationship between the cause of primary renal allograft failure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or fasting C-peptide level at retransplant and subsequent pancreatic allograft failure. An elevated HbA1c in the month after renal retransplant correlated with subsequent pancreatic graft loss and patients experiencing pancreatic graft loss were more likely to subsequently lose their renal retransplant. Although it is difficult to prospectively identify those patients who will return to insulin therapy after repeat renal transplantation, the relatively high frequency of this event mandates that this risk be conveyed to patients. Nonetheless, the survival benefit associated with renal retransplantation justifies pursuing retransplantation in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lamattina
- Division of Transplantation, University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Qureshi MS, Callaghan CJ, Bradley JA, Watson CJE, Pettigrew GJ. Outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from brain-dead and controlled circulatory death donors. Br J Surg 2012; 99:831-8. [PMID: 22437616 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2012] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organ scarcity has prompted increased use of organs from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. An early single-centre experience of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation from controlled DCD donors is described here. METHODS Outcomes of SPK transplants from DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) donors between August 2008 and January 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS SPK transplants from 20 DCD and 40 DBD donors were carried out. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar for both groups, although pancreas cold ischaemia times were shorter in DCD recipients: median (range) 8·2 (5·9-10·5) versus 9·5 (3·8-12·5) h respectively (P = 0·004). Median time from treatment withdrawal to cold perfusion was 24 (range 16-110) min for DCD donors. There were no episodes of delayed pancreatic graft function in either group; the graft thrombosis rates were both 5 per cent. Similarly, there were no differences in haemoglobin A1c level at 12 months: median (range) 5·4 (4·9-7·7) per cent in DCD group versus 5·4 (4·1-6·2) per cent in DBD group (P = 0·910). Pancreas graft survival rates were not significantly different, with Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival estimates of 84 and 95 per cent respectively (P = 0·181). CONCLUSION DCD SPK grafts had comparable short-term outcomes to DBD grafts, even when procured from selected donors with a prolonged agonal phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Qureshi
- Cambridge Transplant Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, National Institute for Health Research and Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pancreas transplant options for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2012; 17:80-6. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32834ee73a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
23
|
Early pancreas graft failure is associated with inferior late clinical outcomes after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 2011; 92:796-801. [PMID: 21832957 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31822dc36b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early pancreas graft failure after simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation is common. We studied the impact of early pancreas graft failure on long-term kidney and patient survival. METHODS We included all primary SPK transplants performed in the United States between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2007, who had maintained kidney graft function at 90 days posttransplantation. Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate analyses were performed. The causes of death between the two cohorts were compared. RESULTS A total of 6282 SPK recipients were included in the analyses. Of those, 470 had lost pancreas graft within the first 90 days largely related to pancreas graft thrombosis. Early pancreas graft failure was associated with lower subsequent kidney graft and patient survival (log-rank, P=0.02 and P<0.001, respectively). Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated a 70% higher risk of kidney graft failure after 3 years (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69; 95% CI 1.08, 2.66; P=0.022) and more than doubled the risk for death (adjusted hazard ratio 2.18; 95% CI 1.67, 2.85; P<0.001) among SPK recipients with early pancreas graft failure. The causes of death were similar between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION Early pancreas graft failure in SPK transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk for subsequent kidney failure and death. Optimization of therapeutic interventions after early pancreas graft failure is needed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Axelrod DA, Gheorghian A, Schnitzler MA, Dzebisashvili N, Salvalaggio PR, Tuttle-Newhall J, Segev DL, Gentry S, Hohmann S, Merion RM, Lentine KL. The economic implications of broader sharing of liver allografts. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:798-807. [PMID: 21401867 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03443.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation has evolved over the past four decades into the most effective method to treat end-stage liver failure and one of the most expensive medical technologies available. Accurate understanding of the financial implication of recipient severity of illness is crucial to assessing the economic impact of allocation policies. A novel database of linked clinical data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network with cost accounting data from the University HealthSystem Consortium was used to analyze liver transplant costs for 15,813 liver transplants. This data was then utilized to consider the economic impact of alternative allocation systems designed to increase sharing of liver allografts using simulation results. Transplant costs were strongly associated with recipient severity of illness as assessed by the MELD score (p < 0.0001); however, this relationship was not linear. Simulation analysis of the reallocation of livers from low MELD patients to high MELD using a two-tiered regional sharing approach (MELD 15/25) resulted in 88 fewer deaths annually at estimated cost of $17,056 per quality-adjusted life-year saved. The results suggest that broader sharing of liver allografts offers a cost-effective strategy to reduce the mortality from end stage liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Axelrod
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sampaio MS, Kuo HT, Bunnapradist S. Outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in type 2 diabetic recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6:1198-206. [PMID: 21441123 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.06860810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Type 2 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease may receive a simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant. However, outcomes are not well described. Risks for death and graft failure were examined in SPK type 2 diabetic recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, outcomes of SPK transplants were compared between type 2 and type 1 diabetic recipients. All primary SPK adult recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2007 (n=6756) were stratified according to end-stage pancreas disease diagnosis (type 1: n=6141, type 2: n=582). Posttransplant complications and risks for death and kidney/pancreas graft failure were compared. RESULTS Of the 6756 SPK transplants, 8.6% were performed in recipients with a type 2 diabetes diagnosis. Rates of delayed kidney graft function and primary kidney nonfunction were higher in the type 2 diabetics. Five-year overall and death-censored kidney graft survival were inferior in type 2 diabetics. After adjustment for other risk factors, including recipient (age, race, body weight, dialysis time, and cardiovascular comorbidities), donor, and transplant immune characteristics, type 2 diabetes was not associated with increased risk for death or kidney or pancreas failure when compared with type 1 diabetic recipients. CONCLUSIONS After adjustment for other risk factors, SPK recipients with type 2 diabetes diagnosis were not at increased risk for death, kidney failure, or pancreas failure when compared with recipients with type 1 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Santos Sampaio
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jahansouz C, Kumer SC, Ellenbogen M, Brayman KL. Evolution of β-Cell Replacement Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus: Pancreas Transplantation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13:395-418. [PMID: 21299398 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2010.0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 23.6 million people in the United States are affected. Of these individuals, 5-10% have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (TIDM), an autoimmune disease. Although it often appears in childhood, T1DM may manifest at any age. The effects of T1DM can be devastating, as the disease often leads to significant secondary complications, morbidity, and decreased quality of life. Since the late 1960s, surgical treatment for diabetes mellitus has continued to evolve and has become a viable alternative to chronic insulin administration. In this review, the historical evolution, current status, graft efficacy, benefits, and complications of pancreas transplantation are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Jahansouz
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mora M, Ricart MJ, Casamitjana R, Astudillo E, López I, Jiménez A, Fernández-Cruz L, Esmatjes E. Pancreas and kidney transplantation: long-term endocrine function. Clin Transplant 2010; 24:E236-40. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01261.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
28
|
Luan FL, Kommareddi M, Cibrik DM, Samaniego M, Ojo AO. Influence of recipient race on the outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010; 10:2074-81. [PMID: 20645942 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03211.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Racial differences on the outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation have not been well studied. We compared mortality and graft survival of African Americans (AA) recipients to other racial/ethnic groups (non-AA) using the national data. We studied a total of 6585 adult SPK transplants performed in the United States between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine risk factors associated with early graft failure and immune-mediated late graft loss. We used conditional Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses to estimate late death-censored kidney and pancreas graft failure and death between the groups. Although there was no racial disparity in the first 90 days, AA patients had 38% and 47% higher risk for late death-censored kidney and pancreas graft failure, respectively (p = 0.006 and 0.001). AA patients were twice more likely to lose the kidney and pancreas graft due to rejection (OR 2.31 and 1.86, p = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively). Bladder pancreas drainage was associated with inferior patient survival (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.15, 1.75, p = 0.001). In the era of modern immunosuppression, AA SPK transplant patients continue to have inferior graft outcome. Additional studies to explore the mechanisms of such racial disparity are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F L Luan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Luan FL, Samaniego M. Transplantation in diabetic kidney failure patients: modalities, outcomes, and clinical management. Semin Dial 2010; 23:198-205. [PMID: 20374550 DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-139x.2010.00708.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common and devastating disease, affecting up to 19.3 million Americans. It is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States. Diabetic patients with ESRD have a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and death. For those kidney transplant patients with no history of DM prior to transplantation, the development of new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) also poses a serious threat to both graft and patient survival. Kidney transplantation is the best renal replacement option for diabetic ESRD and has the potential to halt the progression of cardiovascular diseases. Early referral for transplant evaluation is essential for pre-emptive or early kidney transplantation in this cohort of patients. In type 1 DM patients with ESRD, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) should be encouraged; and in patients facing prolonged waiting time for SPK transplantation but with an available living donor, living donor kidney transplantation followed by pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) is a suitable alternative. Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetics is deemed experimental by Medicare, and easy access to this modality remains restricted to qualified patients enrolled in clinical trials or with private insurance. The optimal management of kidney transplant patients with pre-existent DM or NODAT involves a multi-pronged approach consisting of pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention to address all potential cardiovascular risk factors such as glycemic and lipid control, blood pressure control, weight loss, and smoking cessation. Finally, re-transplantation should be recommended in suitable kidney transplant patients when the kidney allograft demonstrates continuous and progressive decline in function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fu L Luan
- Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Current literature in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2009; 25:i-x. [PMID: 19790194 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.1037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|