Human insulin-induced lipoatrophy: a successful treatment with glucocorticoid

Insulin Allergy: The Allergist's Updated Approach to Evaluation and Management

The transformative discovery of insulin in the early 20th century followed by its rapid clinical implementation was initially complicated by high rates of hypersensitivity reactions. Improvements in purification methods and the transition from animal-derived sources to human insulin products has significantly lowered, although not eliminated, hypersensitivity reactions to insulin. Although considered rare adverse reactions to insulin, hypersensitivity reactions and immune-mediated manifestations continue to occur in patients requiring insulin treatment. This has broad implications given that approximately 11.6% of the US population has a diagnosis of diabetes and 8.4 million Americans rely on insulin for survival. Because of the scope and impact of insulin as a life-saving treatment for patients with diabetes, it is important for allergists to evaluate, provide a diagnose for, and manage patients with hypersensitivity reactions to insulin appropriately. Recognizing early manifestations of insulin hypersensitivity is the first step in providing prompt and targeted management in these complex cases. The following article aims to summarize the allergist's recommended approach to insulin hypersensitivity reactions, including type I IgE-mediated and type III immune-complex mediated reactions, type IV T-cell mediated hypersensitivity reactions, as well as additional immune-mediated manifestations of insulin therapy such as lipoatrophy and insulin autoantibodies. Furthermore, the authors emphasize approaching insulin hypersensitivity cases with a broad differential diagnosis, which includes hypoglycemia, anaphylaxis mimics, hypersensitivity to excipients and medical devices, and cutaneous manifestations of diabetes.

Lipoatrophy, a rare complication of diabetes: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Lipoatrophy (LA), a rare skin complication in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), has decreased dramatically over the past decades due to the use of human purified insulin preparations.

METHODS

We collected data from the records of T1D patients with LA. Types of insulin and insulin regimen, presence of eosinophilia, anti-insulin (IAA), anti-GAD, anti-IA2 autoantibodies, other autoimmune disorders, site of atrophy and its relationship to catheter, HbA1c at LA onset and after resolution, and different treatment modalities (i.e., change of insulin type or site, sodium cromoglycate (SCG) cream, cortisone cream or percutaneous injections, and laser treatment) were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirteen out of 1200 T1D subjects (1%) presented with LA. The majority were on insulin pump using rapid-acting analogs. Twelve out of 13 patients had changed the type of insulin, and most of them had switched injection sites. Ten out of 13 patients used SCG cream and 7/10 showed complete/partial improvement. One patient used dexamethasone injection with improvement. Five patients showed self-improvement. In 3/7 patients who were receiving SCG, treatment was combined with change of insulin type (glulisine); however, in 1/3, the result should be attributed to concomitant laser treatment. In 4/7 patients, there was a clear, beneficial effect of SCG. In 1/4 with partial resolution of LA, laser treatment was used after SCG, which further improved the result.

CONCLUSIONS

LA is a rare skin complication seen even today with the use of insulin analogs. SCG alone or combined with change of insulin type seems to be the most effective treatment. Laser treatment is a promising new therapy.

Multifocal lipoatrophy secondary to insulin injection in a patient with type 2 diabetes, hepatitis B virus infection, and liver cirrhosis

Lipoatrophy secondary to insulin injection is a rare complication of insulin use. Localized lipoatrophy is recognized by a loss of subcutaneous fat caused by insulin injection. We report the case of a 69-year-old non-obese female patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus, decompensated liver cirrhosis, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who developed multifocal lipoatrophy during the administration of human insulin and an insulin analog.

Associations of insulin-induced lipodystrophy in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus using recombinant human insulin: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Insulin-induced lipodystrophy is of two types, lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy. Lipodystrophy often leads to worsening of glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Our objective was to identify the clinical, immunological, and other factor(s) associated with the development of lipodystrophy.

METHODS

In this observational cross-sectional hospital-based study, 95 children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus were observed for the development of lipodystrophy. Injection technique, insulin dose, and glycemic parameters were noted. Serum TNF-α, IL-1β, and anti-insulin antibody levels were measured. Histopathological examination of the lipodystrophic area was done in a small number of people.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 45.2% of participants had lipohypertrophy and 4.2% had lipoatrophy exclusively; 3.1% of participants had coexisting lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy. Improper injection site rotation technique was more common in participants with lipohypertrophy in comparison to those without lipodystrophy. The age of onset of diabetes, duration of insulin use, and the number of times of needle reuse were not significantly different between the lipohypertrophy and nonlipodystrophy groups. Serum TNF-α, IL-1β, and anti-insulin antibody levels; HbA_1c; rate of hypoglycemia; and body weight-adjusted dose requirement were higher among the participants with lipohypertrophy. On histopathology, scant, or no inflammatory infiltrate was found in lipoatrophic and lipohypertrophic areas, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Improper insulin injection technique and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines and anti-insulin antibody are associated with lipodystrophy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. HbA_1c and rate of hypoglycemia are higher in people with lipodystrophy.

Lipoatrophy in children, adolescents and adults with insulin pump treatment: Is there a beneficial effect of insulin glulisine?

AIM

To investigate whether zinc-free insulin is an effective treatment option for lipoatrophy.

METHODS

Controlled, randomized, open-label parallel study in young people with type 1 diabetes, pump treatment and lipoatrophy at injection sites. Participants underwent dermatological examination and evaluation of affected areas using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After randomization, half of themswitched to insulin glulisine (intervention group) for 6 months. The control group continued their treatment with zinc-containing insulin and switched to insulin glulisine 6 months later. Both groups were followed-up until month 12. Primary endpoint was the increase of the relative thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer of the most atrophic site at 6 months as documented by MRI.

RESULTS

Fourteen participants were included into the study. While relative thickness of subcutaneous fat tissue was comparable between intervention (-60% [-98.8 - -17.6], n = 7) and control group (-50% [-72.7 - -1.0], P = .511; median (range), n = 7)at baseline, it improved in the intervention (-14.3% [-85.7-83.3] vs -31.3% (-66.7-0), P = .031), but not in the control group (P = .125) after 6 months. At 12 months, relative fat thickness (P = .003), number (P = .015) and size of most atrophic sites (P = .001) were improved in the intervention group. Number (P = .018) and size of most atrophic sites (P = .008) were also reduced in the control group between 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present pilot study is based on a small sample, the data give first hint that the use of the zinc-free insulin glulisine may be beneficial in people with diabetes, pump and lipoatrophy.

Allergic contact dermatitis in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: An emerging issue

AIMS

Aim of our observational study was to assess the prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes who use technological devices for diabetes treatment and its management. Secondary outcome was to identify possible clinical and/or demographic variables that could be associated to contact dermatitis.

METHODS

Among a total of 215 patients using insulin pumps and/or glucose sensors followed-up at our Pediatric Diabetes Centre between January and September 2018, 64 patients were enrolled and 42 (19 male and 23 female) completed the study. Demographic and clinical features of the study population were statistically analysed. All the patients underwent patch testing with specific allergens belonged to resin and acrylate classes.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients experienced skin reactions suggestive of allergic contact dermatitis, demonstrating a prevalence of 8.4%. None of the demographic or clinical variables were associated to skin reactions. Colophonium was the most identified sensitizing allergen (87.5% of the cases).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of sensitization to allergens included into diabetes devices among pediatric patients is higher than commonly assumed. Well-designed studies are needed to better investigate the association between type 1 diabetes and allergic contact dermatitis. Moreover, we suggest that manufactures should supply detailed information about adhesives in order to avoid dermatological complications and consequently a worsening of disease management and patients' quality of life.

Cutaneous Adverse Effects of Diabetes Mellitus Medications and Medical Devices: A Review

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the USA. If uncontrolled, diabetes can lead to devastating complications. Diabetes medications and medical devices largely contribute to the significant financial expense that the disease inflicts on affected individuals and society. Alongside significant economic burden, there are numerous cutaneous adverse effects associated with diabetes medications and medical devices. Despite the large and increasing number of individuals living with diabetes and the wide use of the related medications and medical devices, there is limited literature that comprehensively documents their cutaneous adverse effects. These cutaneous adverse effects are significant as they can worsen glycemic control, increase disease distress, and may increase risk of associated complications. Thus, it is important that providers can recognize these cutaneous adverse effects, identify the culprit agents, and can properly manage them. In this article, we provide a critical review of the cutaneous adverse effects of medications and devices used in the management of diabetes and provide insight into risk factors and prevention and an overview of therapeutic management. An emphasis is placed on clinical recognition and treatment for use of the medical providers who, regardless of practice setting, will treat patients with diabetes.

Preserving Skin Integrity with Chronic Device Use in Diabetes

Skin integrity and diabetes device placement are ongoing concerns for people with diabetes who utilize continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps. This is especially significant for individuals with skin sensitivities, pediatric patients, and those who use devices chronically. Dermatological complications are often cited as a barrier to device use and a reason for device discontinuation. Furthermore, it is a frequent topic of discussion in diabetes follow-up visits, although little evidence-based literature exists to guide providers in managing skin integrity issues. The purpose of this article is to review current literature related to the prevalence of dermatological issues with insulin pumps and CGM, discuss published solutions to skin irritation, and to share the consolidated experience of our large academic diabetes clinic to address placement, prophylactic skin care, adhesives, removal, and skin healing with diabetes device use. Recommendations for targeted studies, increased surveillance, and development of new adhesive compounds are suggested to reduce the burden of device wear for management of diabetes.

Detemir plus aspart and glulisine induced lipoatrophy: 2015 literature review and report of a new case

BACKGROUND

In the first and only literature review, conducted in 2009, of human insulin analog- induced lipoatrophy, there were 12 published cases, including 1 with aspart, 1 with detemir, 1 with NovoMix 30 and none with detemir plus aspart. It is perceived that insulin analog induced-lipoatrophy is increasing. We conducted a 2015 literature review of published reports of lipoatrophy induced by aspart, detemir, detemir plus aspart, and NovoMix30. We also report a new case of detemir plus aspart and glulisine induced lipoatrophy.

METHODS

Our focused literature searches (limited to 1995-2014) in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, using a combination of insulin analog and lipoatrophy terminology, was conducted in early January 2015.

RESULTS

From the 520 unique citations there were 33 (from 13 papers and 9 abstracts) lipoatrophy cases induced by detemir (n = 5), aspart (n = 21), detemir plus aspart (n = 4) and NovoMix 30 (n = 3), representing 30 new cases since 2009. Many of these reported cases were females (76 %), had type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (94 %) and were in young persons (61 %). A 41-year-old T1DM woman developed lipoatrophy on her upper thighs, arms and abdomen 14 months after injecting detemir plus aspart at the same sites. Later on, after a year on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using aspart and then glulisine, she developed lipoatrophy at the infusion sites. When CSII insulin was switched to lispro she did not develop lipoatrophy after 10 months. Meanwhile, the original lipoatrophy sites significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Our literature review uncovered 30 new published cases of aspart, detemir, aspart plus detemir and NovoMix 30-induced lipoatrophy since 2009. The largest increase in cases was in aspart- induced lipoatrophy. Recent surveys showed most rapid acting insulin analog-induced lipoatrophy were associated with CSII. In our review of the reported cases, 85.7 % cases of aspart-induced lipoatrophy were associated with CSII. As in previous reports, we showed lipoatrophy was more common in females, T1DM and young persons. Our patient may be the 5^th published case of detemir plus aspart-induced lipoatrophy and possibly the first case report of glulisine induced lipoatrophy. She believed both detemir plus aspart and glulisine induced the lipoatrophy.

Insulin-induced localized lipoatrophy preceded by shingles (herpes zoster): a case report

Introduction

Localized involutional lipoatrophy of subcutaneous adipose tissue may develop due to subcutaneous injection of pharmaceutical preparations. The pathogenesis of this adverse drug reaction is unknown. The progression of localized involutional lipoatrophy ceases and occasionally it resolves after withdrawing the inducing agent. In case of localized involutional lipoatrophy due to subcutaneous insulin therapy, low-dose systemic corticosteroids may be curative despite ongoing insulin administration.

Case presentation

We report a recurrence of insulin-induced localized involutional lipoatrophy at the abdominal wall in a 57-year-old Caucasian woman with type-1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. The first episode of insulin-induced localized involutional lipoatrophy two years previously had been cured by oral prednisone. The recurrence was treated immediately with 10mg prednisone once daily for five months, and was cured thereafter. The insulin analog preparation (Humalog™) and the insulin pump equipment (Accu-Chek Spirit™) applied were the same during both episodes. Both episodes were preceded by a temporary disturbance of the immune balance (the first episode by vaccination, the second episode through shingles).

Conclusions

This case confirms that insulin-induced localized involutional lipoatrophy in type-1 diabetes can occur again, and can be cured by systemic corticosteroids. We suggest that temporary disturbance of the immune balance may trigger this transitory idiosyncratic reaction in a susceptible individual.

Lipoatrophy is associated with an increased risk of Hashimoto's thyroiditis and coeliac disease in female patients with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Lipoatrophy (LA) is a rare, possibly under-recognised side effect of insulin treatment of unclear aetiology. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who have LA and to explore the relationship between LA and other autoimmune diseases based on the hypothesis that additional autoimmune phenomena are more prevalent in T1D patients with LA.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational study of T1D patients with LA in comparison to T1D patients without LA who are registered with the Diabetes Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentationssystem database of 241,650 patients in Germany and Austria.

RESULTS

Hashimoto's thyroiditis and coeliac disease were more prevalent in patients with LA (p < 0.001 for both). LA was associated with an increased risk of Hashimoto's thyroiditis and coeliac disease in female patients [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, p = 0.003, and OR 3.1, p = 0.02, respectively]. This relationship persisted after adjustment for current age, duration of diabetes and calendar year of treatment (OR 2.7, p = 0.002, and OR 3.5, p = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the hypothesis that an immune complex-mediated inflammatory process may be important in the development of LA.

Relapsing insulin-induced lipoatrophy, cured by prolonged low-dose oral prednisone: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Circumscript, progressing lipoatrophy at the insulin injection sites is an unexplained, however rare condition in diabetes mellitus.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of severe localised lipoatrophy developing during insulin pump-treatment (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion) with the insulin analogue lispro (Humalog®) in a woman with type-1 diabetes mellitus. After 11 months of progressing lipoatrophy at two spots on the abdomen, low-dose prednisone (5-10 mg) p.o. was given at breakfast for 8 months, whereby the atrophic lesions centripetally re-filled with subcutaneous fat tissue (confirmed by MRI) despite ongoing use of insulin lispro. However, 4 weeks after cessation of prednisone, lipoatrophy relapsed, but resolved after another 2 months of low-dose prednisone. No further relapse was noted during 12 months of follow-up on insulin-pump therapy with Humalog®.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with an assumed inflammatory nature of the condition, low-dose oral prednisone appeared to have cured the lipoatrophic reaction in our patient. Our observation suggests a temporary intolerance of the subcutaneous fat tissue to insulin lispro (Humalog®), triggered by an unknown endogenous mechanism.

Pan-insulin allergy and severe lipoatrophy complicating Type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

  Insulin allergy is a rare complication of insulin use. Localized lipoatrophy is also known to occur following subcutaneous injections of insulin.

CASE REPORT

  A 53-year-old non-obese female patient with Type 2 diabetes displayed local allergic-type symptoms to all available insulin preparations. This was complicated by the development of severe lipoatrophy on her abdominal and thigh injection sites and subsequently resulted in suboptimal glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

  Whilst uncommon, insulin allergy and lipoatrophy can cause major problems in diabetic management. Potential pathophysiological mechanisms and a stepwise approach to management are discussed.

Lipoatrophy induced by subcutaneous insulin infusion: ultrastructural analysis and gene expression profiling

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) lipoatrophy (LA) is a rare complication of insulin therapy. We aimed to analyze the ultrastructural and molecular aspects of LA lesions.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Macroscopic and microscopic morphology of SAT beneath the LA areas from patients with type 1 diabetes treated with Lispro insulin by continuous sc insulin infusion was studied using magnetic resonance imaging, immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, and quantitative PCR for adipose tissue-specific genes.

RESULTS

SAT was present in LA lesions characterized by: 1) smaller, unilocular perilipin-positive adipocytes, with lipofuscin granules; 2) some "slimmed cells" losing lipid droplets as those we observed during starvation; and 3) numerous perivascular preadipocytes. We did not identify inflammatory cells. SAT in LA areas displayed a strong leptin down-regulation and an increase of AEBP1, a preadipocyte marker.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results clearly indicate that the remarkable reduction in fat cell lipid droplets and adipocyte size justifies the decrease of SAT without a reduction in adipocyte number because of necrosis or apoptosis. Thus, immune cells and any other toxic damaging fat cells were not involved in the generation of LA. We speculate that adipocytes chronically exposed to high local insulin concentrations could become severely insulin resistant, dramatically increasing lipolysis and giving rise to "slimmed cells." Clinical LA regression could be explained by the active recruitment of preadipocytes, even if they were unable to differentiate and regenerate adipose tissue unless the insulin injection was removed.

Lipodystrophy reactions to insulin: effects of continuous insulin infusion and new insulin analogs

Management of diabetes mellitus can be responsible for cutaneous adverse events. For example, lipoatrophy or lipohypertrophy can develop at the site of insulin injections. Lipohypertrophy remains a frequent complication of insulin therapy irrespective of the insulin source and mode of administration. Lipoatrophy at insulin injection sites is considered to be an immune complex-mediated inflammatory lesion; however, it has become a rare event since the advent of human insulin. Nowadays, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using a portable pump and/or injections of insulin analogs with an altered amino acid sequence compared with native insulin may cause lipodystrophy in diabetic patients. Some case reports describe the recovery of lipoatrophy following the use of CSII and/or short-acting insulin analogs. Conversely, exceptional cases of lipoatrophy have occurred in patients receiving lispro insulin analog via CSII. Lipodystrophy reactions remain a potential problem when managing diabetic patients with new insulin therapy technologies.