Metabolism of chlorpropamide

Chlorpropamide 2-hydroxylation is catalysed by CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 in vitro: chlorpropamide disposition is influenced by CYP2C9, but not by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism

AIMS

We evaluated the involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms 2C9 and 2C19 in chlorpropamide 2-hydroxylation in vitro and in chlorpropamide disposition in vivo.

METHODS

To identify CYP isoforms(s) that catalyse 2-hydroxylation of chlorpropamide, the incubation studies were conducted using human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP isoforms. To evaluate whether genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C9 and/or CYP2C19 influence the disposition of chlorpropamide, a single oral dose of 250 mg chlorpropamide was administered to 21 healthy subjects pregenotyped for CYP2C9 and CYP2C19.

RESULTS

In human liver microsomal incubation studies, the formation of 2-hydroxychlorpropamide (2-OH-chlorpropamide), a major chlorpropamide metabolite in human, has been best described by a one-enzyme model with estimated K(m) and V(max) of 121.7 +/- 19.9 microm and 16.1 +/- 5.0 pmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein, respectively. In incubation studies using human recombinant CYP isoforms, however, 2-OH-chlorpropamide was formed by both CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 with similar intrinsic clearances (CYP2C9 vs. CYP2C19: 0.26 vs. 0.22 microl min(-1) nmol(-1) protein). Formation of 2-OH-chlorpropamide in human liver microsomes was significantly inhibited by sulfaphenazole, but not by S-mephenytoin, ketoconazole, quinidine, or furafylline. In in vivo clinical trials, eight subjects with the CYP2C9*1/*3 genotype exhibited significantly lower nonrenal clearance [*1/*3 vs.*1/*1: 1.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.1 ml h(-1) kg(-1), P < 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference 0.2, 1.0] and higher metabolic ratios (of chlorpropamide/2-OH-chlorpropamide in urine: *1/*3 vs.*1/*1: 1.01 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.56 +/- 0.08, P < 0.05; 95% CI on the difference - 0.9, - 0.1) than did 13 subjects with CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype. In contrast, no differences in chlorpropamide pharmacokinetics were observed for subjects with the CYP2C19 extensive metabolizer vs. poor metabolizer genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that chlorpropamide disposition is principally determined by CYP2C9 activity in vivo, although both CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 have a catalysing activity of chlorpropamide 2-hydroxylation pathway.

Pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide in epileptic patients: effects of enzyme induction and urine pH on chlorpropamide elimination

The effects of liver enzyme induction and of urine pH on the pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide have been studied. A single oral dose of chlorpropamide 250 mg was administered to 8 patients on antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin, carbamazepine) and to 8 healthy volunteers. The half-life of chlorpropamide was significantly shorter in the patients (34.4 h) than in the healthy volunteers (50.2 h), but the difference between the groups in the half-life of antipyrine was even more pronounced (5.1 vs 11.4 h). The clearance and volume of distribution of total chlorpropamide were significantly higher in the patients (2.99 ml X h-1 X kg-1 and 126 ml X kg-1) than in the healthy volunteers (1.60 ml X h-1 X kg-1 and 106 ml X kg-1). The unbound fraction of chlorpropamide in serum was also higher in the patients (5.7%) than in the healthy subjects (4.4%). Neither the volume of distribution nor the clearance of the free fraction of chlorpropamide differed significantly between the groups. There was a significant correlation between the half-lives of chlorpropamide and antipyrine, and the half-life of chlorpropamide also had at least as good an inverse correlation with the urinary excretion of unchanged chlorpropamide. The renal clearance of chlorpropamide correlated well with urine pH and was almost 100-fold higher at pH 7 than at pH 5. Both the metabolic and renal clearances of chlorpropamide are important in its elimination. At urine pH higher than 6.5-7, the renal clearance of chlorpropamide represents more than half its total clearance regardless the degree of induction of liver enzymes.

Structure vs. activity in the sulfonylurea-mediated disulfiram-ethanol reaction

The oral hypoglycemic agents, chlorpropamide (CP) and tolbutamide (TB) are known to elicit a clinical disulfiram-ethanol reaction (DER) when consumed with alcohol. In rats, this DER is manifested in vivo by the elevation of blood acetaldehyde (AcH) levels, a consequence of the inhibition of hepatic aldehyde dehydrogenase (AIDH). Administration of CP or TB to rats (1.0 mmol/kg, IP), followed by ethanol one hour before sacrifice, raised blood AcH levels 12- and 2-times that of control animals, respectively for CP and TB when measured at 3 hours, and 20-fold and 8-fold at 16 hours post drug administration. CP and TB had no effect on AIDH activity when incubated with either intact or osmotically disrupted rat liver mitochondria, indicating that a metabolite of CP or TB is responsible for the inhibition of AIDH in vivo. Hydrolysis products of CP, the 2'-hydroxylated products of CP, tolpropamide and tolethamide, or the 3'-hydroxylated analogs of CP and tolpropamide, were uniformly inactive in elevating ethanol-derived blood AcH. Pretreatment of rats with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole or SKF-525A had no effect on the elevation of blood AcH mediated by CP or TB, while phenobarbital pretreatment decreased blood AcH by 69%. Although our results clearly indicated that side chain hydroxylation and subsequent oxidation do not play a role in AIDH inhibition by CP or TB, the nature of the side chain attached to the sulfonylurea moiety appears to influence this inhibitory activity in vivo. Thus, the order of activity in the homologous series was, chlorpropamide greater than chlorbutamide greater than chlorethamide much greater than chlormethamide, chlorisopropamide = 0.

Oral hypoglycaemic agents. An update

Despite the availability of oral hypoglycaemic agents for nearly 30 years, their precise mode of action and role in the management of diabetes mellitus remains poorly defined and controversial. They are regarded by many, though not all, clinicians as helpful adjuncts in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes who have failed to respond satisfactorily to an adequate programme of dietary treatment. Their initial effectiveness is greatest in those patients who have had diabetes for less than 5 years, are overweight at the time of initiation of therapy, and whose fasting blood glucose levels are not unduly raised (less than 200 mg/dl). If they are receiving treatment with insulin and a shift to oral compounds is contemplated, success in the changeover is more likely if the daily dose has been less than 20 to 30 units daily. While their efficacy in maintaining adequate glycaemic control over the short term in responsive patients is unquestioned, the long term benefit of oral hypoglycaemic agents in reducing morbidity and mortality of late complications remains to be substantiated. In this regard, where long term efficacy is difficult to quantify, physician vigilance for chronic toxicity assumes a special importance. Notwithstanding the potential for interaction between sulphonylureas and numerous other drugs, significant adverse effects are uncommon. Hypoglycaemia is the major health concern associated with the use of sulphonylureas, and lactic acidosis has been the major problem with biguanides. Careful patient selection is thus the key to ensuring efficacy and avoiding toxicity. Recent evidence suggests that while the insulinotropic action of the sulphonylureas may explain the short term hypoglycaemic effect of these compounds, their reported action in enhancing insulin sensitivity, both at the receptor and post-receptor levels, more likely accounts for the long term maintenance of improved carbohydrate tolerance. The relatively new ('second generation') sulphonylurea compounds have not been shown to possess clearly defined advantages over the older preparations; the potentially beneficial effects of gliclazide on the microangiopathic changes of diabetes require considerable further evaluation.