Validation of the Early Functional Abilities scale: An assessment of four dimensions in early recovery after traumatic brain injury

Development and Effect Evaluation of an Action-Oriented Interdisciplinary Weaning Protocol for Cuffed Tracheostomy Tubes in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury

The objective was to develop an interdisciplinary weaning protocol (IWP) for patients with tracheostomy tubes due to acquired brain injury, and to effect evaluate implementation of the IWP on decannulation rates and weaning duration. An expert panel completed a literature review in 2018 to identify essential criteria in the weaning process. Based on consensus and availability in clinical practice, criteria for guiding the weaning process were included in the protocol. Using the IWP, dysphagia is graded as either severe, moderate, or mild. The weaning process is guided through a protocol which specified the daily duration of cuff deflation until decannulation, along with recommendations for treatment and rehabilitation interventions. Data from 337 patient records (161 before and 176 after implementation) were included for effect evaluation. Decannulation rate during hospitalization was unchanged at 91% vs. 90% before and after implementation (decannulation rate at 60 days was 68% vs. 74%). After implementation, the weaning duration had decreased compared to before implementation, hazard ratio 1.309 (95%CI: 1.013; 1.693), without any increased risk of tube-reinsertion or pneumonia. Furthermore, a tendency toward decreased length of stay was seen with median 102 days (IQR: 73-138) and median 90 days (IQR: 58-119) (p = 0.061) before and after implementation, respectively. Scientific debate on weaning protocols for tracheostomy tubes are encouraged.

Cross-cultural validity and psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire in a clinical refugee sample

Background: The ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD diagnoses have been examined in several studies using the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ). The cross-cultural validity of the ITQ has not previously been studied using item responses theory methods focused on the issue of equal item functioning and thus comparability of scores across language groups.Objective: To investigate the cross-cultural validity of the ITQ scales considering specifically local independence of items and differential item functioning (DIF) in a cross-cultural sample of refugees.Method: Data from 490 treatment-seeking refugees were included, covering Danish, Arabic, and Bosnian languages and different levels of interpreter-assisted administration. Rasch and graphical log-linear Rasch models were used.Results: There was strong local dependence among items from the same symptom clusters in the PTSD and disorders in self-organization (DSO) scales, except between affective dysregulation items. Weak local dependence was discovered between an item from the affective dysregulation cluster and an item from the disturbed relationship cluster. There was no evidence of DIF related to language or interpreter assistance. There was evidence of DIF for two PTSD items relative to gender and time since the traumatic event. The targeting of the scales to the study population was not optimal. Reliability varied from 0.55 to 0.78 for subgroups.Conclusions: The PTSD and the DSO scales have stable psychometric properties across the Danish, Arabic, and Bosnian language versions and different levels of assisted administration. Scores are comparable across these groups. However, DIF relative to gender and time since trauma introduces considerable measurement bias. DIF-adjusted summed scale scores or estimated person parameters should be used to avoid measurement bias. Future research should investigate whether scales including more and/or alternative items that require higher levels of PTSD and DSO to be endorsed will improve targeting and measurement precision for refugee populations.

Subacute prognosis of oral nutrition (SPOON): Development of a multivariable prognostic model for complete oral intake in tube-fed subjects with acquired brain injury

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Enteral feeding is very common following an acquired brain injury. However, no prognostic models for oral food intake have been developed for subacute rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model and online tool, coined "subacute prognosis of oral nutrition" (SPOON), for complete oral intake in tube-fed subjects with acquired brain injury.

METHODS

The model was developed using routinely gathered clinical data from a cohort of 1233 adult patients who were tube-fed at admission for sub-acute inpatient rehabilitation. Candidate predictors were included based on scientific evidence and their availability in the medical records within the first days following admission. The outcome was time until achieving complete oral food intake without any tube-feeding supplements. Time until complete oral intake was analyzed by discrete time-to-event analysis with logit-link and presented as daily odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The following predictors of complete oral intake were included in the model: age, diagnosis, cuffed tracheostomy tube, days from injury to admission for rehabilitation, and the Early Functional Abilities (EFA) sum score. Multiple adjusted analyses were performed stratified by cuffed tracheostomy tube status. Some of the strongest predictors of complete oral intake were age 18-40 years, OR 1.99 (95%CI: 1.53; 2.59); 0-2 weeks since injury, OR 3.75 (95%CI: 2.72; 5.16); and EFA 61-100 (slight/no disturbance in function), OR 5.81 (95%CI: 4.47; 7.55). The online prognostic tool SPOON was evaluated in a usability study. Based on feedback from clinicians, the tool was further refined to enable extraction of data for prediction directly from medical records.

CONCLUSIONS

The objective of SPOON is to complement the planning of rehabilitation initiatives and inform discussions to determine if a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube should be inserted. SPOON is being implemented locally, but external validation based on appropriate data modeling is warranted before further clinical implementation.

The Early Functional Abilities-revised may bridge the gap between the disorder of consciousness and the functional independence scales: evidence from Rasch analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a tremendous clinical and research need to bridge the gap between disorder of consciousness and functional independence scales with a single unidimensional measure in people with acquired brain injury.

AIM

To calibrate an essentially unidimensional subset of items from the Italian Early Functional Abilities (EFA), demonstrating internal construct validity and sufficient reliability for individual patient measurement.

DESIGN

Multicenter observational cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Inpatients from 11 different Italian Rehabilitation centers.

POPULATION

Three hundred sixty-two adult patients with a disorder of consciousness due to an acquired brain injury.

METHODS

The Italian version of EFA was administered to the sample and then submitted to Mokken analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Rasch analysis, Confirmatory Bifactor Analysis, and external construct validity.

RESULTS

According to Mokken Analysis (all item scalability coefficients Hj positive; all item-pair scalability coefficients Hij >0.3; scale coefficient H=0.762), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (RMSEA=0.081; SRMR=0.048; CFI=0.995; TLI=0.995), the Italian EFA showed a sufficient preliminary unidimensionality. Within Rasch Analysis, a final 12-item solution for the EFA (EFA-R) was calibrated. EFA-R is "essentially unidimensional" according to the following requirements: 1) analysis of residual correlations which supported item essential local independence; 2) a robust correlation between item subtests (rho=0.950); 3) only 2.1% of cases with significant difference between person parameter estimates by different subscales; 4) an explained common variance equal to 0.916 obtained from a final Confirmatory Bifactor Analysis. It also satisfied invariance requirement (unconditional χ2<inf>20</inf>=9.81; P=0.457, conditional class-interval based χ2<inf>35</inf>=33.1; P=0.557), and monotonicity. The reliability (Person Separation Index=0.887) was adequate for person measurements. A practical raw-score-to-measure conversion table based on the EFA-R calibration was devised. Finally, EFA-R strongly correlated with Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (rho=0.922) and motor FIM^™ (rho=0.808).

CONCLUSIONS

EFA-R is an essentially unidimensional subset of 12 items with adequate internal construct validity and sufficient reliability for individual patient measurement under the Rasch Model Theory framework.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

EFA-R has the potential to measure people's functional abilities whose consciousness is improving despite ongoing severe motor-functional impairments during the early stages of rehabilitation. It provides "a measurement bridge" between the disorder of consciousness and the functional independence scales in patients with severe acquired brain injury.

Validity of the Early Functional Ability scale (EFA) among critically ill patients undergoing early neurological rehabilitation

Background

A reliable assessment of the functional abilities of patients after severe brain damage is crucial for valid prognostication and treatment decisions, but most clinical scales are of limited use among this specific group of patients.

Aim

The present study investigates the usefulness of the Early Functional Ability (EFA) scale, which determines the functional abilities of severely impaired patients.

Methods

Critically ill patients consecutively admitted to early neurological rehabilitation were screened for eligibility. We assessed the correlation between the EFA scale and (i) the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI), and (ii) the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). The 1-year outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale-extended (GOSE) was used to examine the predictive validity. Demographical and medical variables were entered into univariate and multivariate binary regression models to identify independent predictors of 1-year outcome.

Results

Two hundred fifty-seven patients (168 men) with a median age of 62 years (IQR = 51–75) were enrolled. The correlation of the EFA scale with the CRS-R was high but low with the ERBI upon admission. Multivariate regression analysis yielded the vegetative subscale of the EFA scale as the only independent predictor for the 1-year outcome of patients admitted to early neurological rehabilitation.

Conclusions

This study shows a high correlation of the EFA scale with the CRS-R but a weak correlation with the ERBI in patients with low functional abilities. With improving patient abilities, these correlations were partly reversed. Thus, the EFA scale is a useful tool to assess the functional abilities and the prognosis of critically ill patients adequately and may be more feasible than other scales.

Statistical analysis plan: Early mobilization by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury

Background

Early mobilization on a tilt table with stepping versus standard care may be beneficial for patients with severe brain injury, but data from randomized clinical trials are lacking. This detailed statistical analysis plan describes the analyses of data collected in a randomized clinical feasibility trial for early mobilization by head-up tilt with stepping versus standard care after severe traumatic brain injury.

Methods

Primary feasibility outcomes are the proportion of included participants who were randomized out of all screened patients; the proportion of participants allocated to the experimental intervention who received at least 60% of the planned exercise sessions; and safety outcomes such as adverse events and reactions and serious adverse events and reactions. Exploratory clinical outcomes are suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions; and functional outcomes as assessed by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised at four weeks; Early Functional Ability Scale and Functional Independence Measure at three months. The description includes the statistical analysis plan, including the use of multiple imputations and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Inclusion, delivery, assessment, and outcomes in longitudinal research on sleep disturbance and agitation in TBI-rehabilitation: lessons learned and future considerations

PURPOSE

This article presents some issues for consideration before scaling from a pilot study to a larger investigation in longitudinal observational studies of traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a case to discuss protocol improvements in longitudinal TBI-rehabilitation studies. The case was a pilot study conducted at two university hospitals in Denmark investigating 1-year outcomes related to sleep disturbance and agitation during neurointensive care. We included patients with moderate and severe TBI determined by the Glasgow Coma Scale, sleep disturbance was assessed using actigraphy, and agitation was assessed using the Agitated Behavior Scale.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 29) were more severely ill and had poorer six-month outcomes in Eastern vs. Western Denmark. Recovery was similar at one-year follow-up. Protocol improvements were needed in relation to inclusion criteria, intervention delivery, patient assessment, and follow-up outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In TBI-rehabilitation studies, we suggest adding the severity of disease score to the initial GCS score and a delirium detection score to the ABS score. Actigraphy should not be used during deep sedation. Established procedures should be in place along all stages of the study protocol, including preparation and periodic assessment of study nurses to optimize data quality.

Two Coarse Spatial Patterns of Altered Brain Microstructure Predict Post-traumatic Amnesia in the Subacute Stage of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Introduction: Diffuse traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is one of the key mechanisms leading to impaired consciousness after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). In addition, preferential regional expression of TAI in the brain may also influence clinical outcome. Aim: We addressed the question whether the regional expression of microstructural changes as revealed by whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the subacute stage after severe TBI may predict the duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA). Method: Fourteen patients underwent whole-brain DTI in the subacute stage after severe TBI. Mean fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated for five bilateral brain regions: fronto-temporal, parieto-occipital, and midsagittal hemispheric white matter, as well as brainstem and basal ganglia. Region-specific calculation of mean FA and MD only considered voxels that showed no tissue damage, using an exclusive mask with all voxels that belonged to local brain lesions or microbleeds. Mean FA or MD of the five brain regions were entered in separate partial least squares (PLS) regression analyses to identify patterns of regional microstructural changes that account for inter-individual variations in PTA. Results: For FA, PLS analysis revealed two spatial patterns that significantly correlated with individual PTA. The lower the mean FA values in all five brain regions, the longer that PTA lasted. A pattern characterized by lower FA values in the deeper brain regions relative to the FA values in the hemispheric regions also correlated with longer PTA. Similar trends were found for MD, but opposite in sign. The spatial FA changes as revealed by PLS components predicted the duration of PTA. Individual PTA duration, as predicted by a leave-one-out cross-validation analysis, correlated with true PTA values (Spearman r = 0.68, p permutation = 0.008). Conclusion: Two coarse spatial patterns of microstructural damage, indexed as reduction in FA, were relevant to recovery of consciousness after TBI. One pattern expressed was consistent with diffuse microstructural damage across the entire brain. A second pattern was indicative of a preferential damage of deep midline brain structures.

The Parental Stress Scale revisited: Rasch-based construct validity for Danish parents of children 2-18 years old with and without behavioral problems

BACKGROUND

Experiencing parental stress is common among parents of children of all ages and is elevated in families characterized by stressors such as poverty, mental health problems, and developmental problems. The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) is a short measure for the assessment of perceived stress resulting from being a parent.

METHODS

This study examines the construct validity and psychometric properties of the Danish PSS using Rasch and graphical loglinear Rasch models in a sample of parents of 2-18-year-old children with and without known behavior problems. We emphasized analyses of differential item functioning, to ascertain whether the scale yields unbiased scores for subgroups of parents.

RESULTS

The 18-item PSS did not fit the Rasch model or a graphical loglinear Rasch model. After dichotomizing item responses and eliminating items 2 and 11, we found the PSS to consist of two distinct subscales measuring parental stress and lack of parental satisfaction. For the total sample, the Parental Stress subscale fit a very complex graphical loglinear Rasch model with differential item functioning relative to parental education and whether children had behavior problems or not. The Lack of Parental Satisfaction subscale fit a simple graphical loglinear Rasch model with differential item functioning only relative to subsample. When dividing into subsamples of parents of children with and without behavior problems, the Parental Stress subscale fit a simple graphical loglinear Rasch model, though still with differential item functioning, while the Lack of Parental Satisfaction subscale fit the Rasch model in each subsample of parents. Both subscales performed best for parents of children with behavior problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSS should be used in a 16-item version and scored as two subscales. The PSS appears better suited for use among parents of children with behavior problems than within a sample without any known difficulties.

Stress beyond coping? A Rasch analysis of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) in an Aboriginal population

The history of colonization contributed to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders becoming one of the most disadvantaged groups in Australia. The multiple social inequalities, and therefore the constant insecurities for many about low income, poor living conditions, unemployment, and discrimination, generate chronic stress in this population. In the Baby Teeth Talk Study, an oral-health randomized controlled trial, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) was administered to 367 pregnant Aboriginal women at baseline. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the PSS-14 in an Aboriginal population. The study analysed: (a) model fit; (b) dimensionality; (c) local dependence; (d) differential item functioning; (e) threshold ordering and item fit; (f) targeting; (g) reliability; and (h) criterion validity. The dimensionality analysis indicated a two-factor structure, with negatively and positively worded items clustering together and 21.7% (95% Agresti-Coull C.I. [17.8%, 26.2%]) statistically significant t-tests between the persons’ estimates. After the creation of composite items, the revised Perceived Distress (χ² (21) = 11.74, p = 0.946) and Perceived Coping (χ² (28) = 17.63, p = 0.935) subscales fitted the Rasch model. Reliability was modest (PersonSeparationIndex_distress = 0.72; PersonSeparationIndex_coping = 0.76). The latent correlation between the Perceived Distress and Perceived Coping subscales was r = 0.14. It is hypothesized that the social inequalities experienced by the Aboriginal population are so pronounced that even Aboriginal pregnant women that perceived themselves as coping well with life challenges ended up endorsing items regarding high levels of stress. The present research showed that a revised PSS-14 is a culturally valid and modestly reliable psychological instrument to measure stress in a population of pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia.

A retrospective study of 251 patients admitted to a multidisciplinary, neurorehabilitation unit with intensive care unit capabilities

Introduction: In Denmark, specialised neurorehabilitation is centralised in two centres; one is Hammel Neurocentre. The neurointensive stepdown unit at Silkeborg Regional Hospital offers intensive care in addition to specialised neurorehabilitation of patients transferring to Hammel. Knowledge on patient's characteristics and course of rehabilitation in this kind of setting is sparse.Objective: To characterise the patients, their change in function and to identify variables associated with referral time to Hammel.Methods: Functional scores and available covariates were extracted from hospital records on 251 patients admitted from 01 November 2011 to 31 July 2016. Statistical methods included logistic regression and paired tests.Results: Mean (standard deviation) time from injury to admission at the neurointensive stepdown unit was 30 (22) d, medians (interquartile range) of Functional Independence Measure and Early Functional Abilities increased significantly from 18 (18, 19) to 24 (18, 44) and 37 (30, 46) to 52 (43, 70), respectively, during admission (p < 0.01). Spontaneous ventilation and Early Functional Abilities score on admission were positively associated with early referral. Obesity and anoxic brain injury were negatively associated with early referral.Conclusions: This study demonstrated functional improvement in patients in a neurointensive stepdown unit and identified variables associated with early referral. The study indicated higher sensitivity of the Early Functional Abilities score as compared to the Functional Independence Measure.Implications for rehabilitationPatients requiring prolonged intensive care services after severe acquired brain injury may require the fusion of neurorehabilitation and intensive care services to benefit maximally.There is a need for a consensus on which functional scores to use when documenting functional level and functional changes in patients with severe acquired brain injury and very low functional levels.The Early Functional Abilities score is an example of a valuable tool when assessing functional levels of patients with severe acquired brain injury and very low functional levels.