Effective non-pharmacological interventions for cancer related cognitive impairment in adults (excluding central nervous system or head and neck cancer): systematic review and meta-analysis

The Role of Rehabilitation for Women with Cancer

As the prevalence of female cancer survivors increases, their quality of life (QOL) and function have become key areas of focus in the context of survivorship and rehabilitation needs. Although behavioral modifications may help to decrease the development of malignancy, women are still at increased risk of developing a cancer diagnosis in their lifetime. Cancer and its treatment can lead to significant functional impairments and symptomatic challenges. However, rehabilitation interventions and medical management provide options to address these issues throughout the oncological continuum of care. With appropriate treatment, women are enabled to experience improved QOL and performance status.

Impact of exercise on health outcomes in people with cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To examine the comprehensive health impacts of exercise on people with cancer by systematically summarising existing evidence and assessing the strength and reliability of the associations.

DESIGN

Umbrella review of meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to 23 July 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials that investigated the associations between exercise and health outcomes among people with cancer.

RESULTS

This umbrella review identified 485 associations from 80 articles, all evaluated as moderate to high quality using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). Two hundred and sixty (53.6%) associations were statistically significant (p<0.05), 81/485 (16.7%) were supported by high-certainty evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. Compared with usual care or no exercise, moderate- to high-certainty evidence supported the view that exercise significantly mitigates adverse events associated with cancer and its treatments (eg, cardiac toxicity, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, cognitive impairment and dyspnoea). Exercise also modulates body composition and biomarkers (eg, insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and C-reactive protein) in people with cancer, and enhances sleep quality, psychological well-being, physiological functioning and social interaction, while improving overall quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Exercise reduces adverse events and enhances well-being through a range of health outcomes in people with cancer.

The effect of non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in cancer: an overview of systematic reviews

PURPOSE

A significant number of cancer survivors experience cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), which can impact their ability to think, reason, make decisions, and perform daily actions. In recent years, non-pharmacological interventions for CRCI have gained significant attention. These interventions include exercise, cognitive behavioural therapy, cognitive training/remediation, dietary, mind-body, and multi-modal/complex interventions. This umbrella review provides a critical overview to inform guidelines and current practice, identify the most promising interventions, and uncover gaps in the research literature.

METHODS

This umbrella review of systematic reviews was pre-registered on Open Science Framework and PROSPERO. Six databases were searched. Systematic reviews (SR) assessing any non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition in cancer (any type) were included. The overview followed gold-standard guidelines and recommendations. The results were narratively synthesised, and descriptive statistics and effect size ranges were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-four (n = 64) SRs were included. Results were synthesised into four non-pharmacological domains. Cognitive training/rehabilitation had the strongest evidence for efficacy. Physical activity/exercise showed promising efficacy; however, the variability of findings was considerable. Mind-body and psychological/behavioural therapy interventions were limited, but there was evidence for short-term effectiveness. Multi-modal/complex interventions showed potential for improving cognition in cancer but were poorly defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, non-pharmacological interventions demonstrated efficacy for improving cognition in cancer. There were limited intervention characteristics within domains which were consistently related to efficacy. Three key recommendations are provided for future research: (1) adopt harmonisation and reporting guidelines; (2) develop definitional guidelines of cognitive domains for CRCI research; and (3) assess intervention and participant characteristics associated with positive versus null/negative findings.

The MASCC COG-IMPACT: An unmet needs assessment for cancer-related cognitive impairment impact developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

PURPOSE

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) can have a profound impact on the lives of cancer survivors. A multitude of subjective and objective assessment tools exist to assess the presence and severity of CRCI. However, no purpose-built tool exists to assess the unmet needs of cancer survivors directly relating to CRCI. This paper details the development and initial validation of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer - Unmet Needs Assessment of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment Impact (the MASCC COG-IMPACT).

METHODS

A multistep mixed-methods measurement development and validation approach was taken with a strong emphasis on co-design. Qualitative interviews were conducted with cancer survivors (n = 32) and oncology health professionals (n = 19), followed by a modified Delphi survey with oncology health professionals (n = 29). Cognitive interviews with cancer survivors (n = 22) over two rounds were then conducted to finalise the penultimate version of the unmet needs assessment tool for CRCI. Four-hundred and ninety-one (n = 491) cancer survivors then completed the MASCC COG-IMPACT and other established measures to inform structural, reliability, validity, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility analyses.

RESULTS

The final MASCC COG-IMPACT is a 55-item and eight subscale tool including two indices: "difficulties" and "unmet needs". The MASCC COG-IMPACT was found to have strong structural validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. The MASCC COG-IMPACT was also found to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.

CONCLUSION

The MASCC COG-IMPACT may facilitate optimal care and referral in line with a cancer survivor's CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. The MASCC COG-IMPACT may also be used to explore factors and contributors to CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs. Overall, the MASCC COG-IMPACT is a highly reliable and valid tool for the assessment of CRCI-related difficulties and unmet needs in both clinical and research settings. The MASCC COG-IMPACT and supporting materials can be accessed on the MASCC webpage or via the MASCC COG-IMPACT Open Science Framework webpage ( https://osf.io/5zc3a/ ).

Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Exercise Intervention for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairments

Introduction: Cancer treatments frequently lead to cognitive impairments, affecting a substantial global population. Among various approaches, exercise has emerged as a promising strategy for rehabilitation. However, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research in this field is lacking. Methods: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of 10,345 articles sourced from the Web of Science database using the R package "bibliometrix". Our analysis examined publication trends, leading countries, journals, authors, institutions, keywords, and prevalent themes. Results: Over the past two decades, research on exercise interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) has advanced significantly. Nonetheless, challenges persist in elucidating underlying mechanisms, developing innovative strategies, and creating effective tools. Conclusions: The number of publications notably increased from 1998 to 2023, although there has been a recent decline in citations. The United States (US) leads in both publications and citations, while China is showing increasing influence. Using Lotka's Law in our bibliometric analysis, we identified 58 key authors in the field of exercise interventions for CRCI. Leading institutions such as the University of Toronto and Duke University are at the forefront of this research. Although the Journal of Clinical Oncology has fewer publications, it remains influential. Current research focuses on exercise interventions to enhance the quality of life for cancer patients, with particular emphasis on cognitive rehabilitation in breast cancer and the challenges faced by survivors. Future research should delve deeper into intervention mechanisms, behavioral strategies, telemedicine, and precise cognitive assessment tools.

A systematic review of rehabilitation programs for cognitive impairment related to breast cancer: Different programs at different times?

BACKGROUND

"Cancer Related Cognitive Impairment" (CRCI) defines cognitive disorders related to cancer and its treatments. Many people with breast cancer experience signs of CRCI (incidence between 20 and 30 %) and, although several intervention options exist, there is no established standard of care. Our main objective was to provide a detailed description of the methods and results of randomized controlled trials of interventions for CRCI in breast cancer survivors, paying particular attention to the timing of the interventions within the care pathway.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines from 01 to 01-2019 to 16-07-2023 and included randomized controlled trials of interventions for CRCI after breast cancer with at least one objective cognitive assessment as a primary or secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Among 228 identified studies, 35 (including 2821 participants) were retained for inclusion. The interventions were classified into 4 categories: cognitive rehabilitation, physical activity, complementary therapy and pharmacological treatment. Our analysis revealed that pharmacological interventions have no effect, whereas physical activity interventions proposed in the months following the initial cancer treatment improve Quality of Life and Speed of Information Processing while interventions proposed later improve Memory and Attention (Cognitive Rehabilitation) and Perceived Cognitive Function and Depression/Anxiety/Mood (Complementary Therapies).

CONCLUSION

CRCI is multifactorial and affected individuals frequently experience high levels of fatigue, pain, anxiety and depression and are most likely to benefit from holistic approaches that include cognition, physical activity, relaxation, psychoeducation, group support and/or psychological counselling. Thus, rehabilitation programs should be designed on multi-modal approaches, using innovative, cost-effective delivery methods that increase access to treatment, and intervention outcomes should be evaluated using measures of participation.

DATABASE REGISTRATION

The review was recorded on Prospero (01-03-2020), with the registration number 135,627.

Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant risk factor influencing the quality of life in lung cancer survivors. No absolute assessment tool has been confirmed to assess CRCI in lung cancer survivors. This review was undertaken to pool the overall prevalence of CRCI and to summarize the assessment tools in assessing CRCI among lung cancer survivors.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and CNKI were searched to retrieve articles reported CRCI prevalence. Summary prevalence estimates were pooled using a random effects model, along with corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs). The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions was incorporated in the analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and leave-one-out analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies, involving 1934 survivors, were included in the review. All of these studies were found to have a low risk of bias in terms of their methodological quality. Four studies (33.3%) utilized the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) criteria to identify CRCI through neuropsychological tests. The pooled prevalence rate of CRCI was found to be 26% (95% PI, 16-37%), I2 = 95.97%. The region in which the studies were conducted was identified as a significant factor contributing to this heterogeneity (p = 0.013). No indication of small-study effects was found (Egger's test: p = 0.9191).

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview of CRCI prevalence and assessment tools in lung cancer survivors. The findings can serve as epidemiological evidence to enhance clinicians' and researchers' understanding of early detection and assessment.

Nutrition-associated health levels in persons with cancer: item response modelling based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

BACKGROUND

The nutritional status of individuals with cancer is a crucial determinant of their health and well-being, and addressing nutrition-related functioning conditions is essential for maintaining physical activity levels and participating in daily activities.

AIM

This study aims to identify an evidence-based International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) scale using item response theory for nutrition conditions in patients with cancer, which can differentiate and assess nutrition-related functioning conditions of cancer survivors.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University.

POPULATION

One hundred cancer patients were enrolled.

METHODS

Via convenience sampling, the study administered a questionnaire consisting of 89 ICF items to participants. The original five-point rating system was binarized (1 = no problem, 0 = problem). Through data shaping, non-parametric IRT analysis and parametric IRT analysis, psychometric properties of nutritional ICF scale were calculated using R software.

RESULTS

The study extracted a unidimensional scale with 32 items and constructed 2-parameter logistic model with good fitness, whose root mean square error approximation (RMSEA) = 0.0759, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.9655, and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.9677. The model demonstrated high reliability, as indicated by a Cronbach's α of 0.95, Guttman λ2 of 0.95, Molenaar Sijtsma statistic of 0.96 and a latent class reliability coefficient (LCRC) of 0.98. Besides, there was a strong correlation between the total score of 32 ICF items and the score of Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA, P<0.001, r=-0.77) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA, P<0.001, r=0.76), suggesting the 32-item scale had high validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The study constructed an evidence-based ICF scale for nutrition conditions in patients with cancer with 32-item and 2PLM for evaluating nutrition-associated health level in persons with cancer, including high validity and reliability.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

The IRT model based on ICF provided a promising assessment tool to discriminate nutrition-associated health level of persons with cancer, and offered an auxiliary method for selecting rehabilitation intervention targets. This has the potential to lead to improved outcomes in cancer treatment and increased quality of life for cancer survivors.

Young Adults' Lived Experiences with Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI; e.g., disrupted memory, executive functioning, and information processing) affects many young adults, causing significant distress, reducing quality of life (QoL), and thwarting their ability to engage in professional, recreational, and social experiences. The purpose of this exploratory qualitative study was to investigate young adults' lived experiences with CRCI, and any strategies (including physical activity) they use to self-manage this burdensome side effect. Sixteen young adults (Mage = 30.8 ± 6.0 years; 87.5% female; Myears since diagnosis = 3.2 ± 3) who reported clinically meaningful CRCI whilst completing an online survey were interviewed virtually. Four themes comprising 13 sub-themes were identified through an inductive thematic analysis: (1) descriptions and interpretations of the CRCI phenomenon, (2) effects of CRCI on day-to-day and QoL, (3) cognitive-behavioural self-management strategies, and (4) recommendations for improving care. Findings suggest CRCI is detrimental to young adults' QoL and must be addressed more systematically in practice. Results also illuminate the promise of PA in coping with CRCI, but research is needed to confirm this association, test how and why this may occur, and determine optimal PA prescriptions for young adults to self-manage their CRCI.

CanCOG®: Cultural Adaptation of the Evidence-Based UCLA Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention Program for Cancer Survivors in Portugal

Cognitive difficulties are highly prevalent and negatively impact cancer survivors' quality of life. The UCLA Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention Program (in short, UCLA program) is an evidence-based intervention developed and tested in the US to address the cognitive complaints of cancer survivors. Since there are no cognitive rehabilitation programs available for Portuguese cancer-related settings, this study aimed to culturally adapt the UCLA program to Portugal. Nine steps were implemented for this cultural adaptation: needs assessment, initial contacts, translation, cultural adaptation, independent review by a panel of experts (n = 6), focus group discussions with cancer survivors (n = 11), systematization of inputs and improvement of the final materials, fidelity check, and preliminary acceptability assessment. The findings suggested that changes to the original materials were needed. A Portuguese name, "CanCOG^®-Reabilitação Cognitiva no Cancro" (in English "CanCOG^®-Cognitive Rehabilitation in Cancer"), and a logo were created to make it more memorable and appealing for the Portuguese population. The language was adjusted to ensure content accessibility and semantic and conceptual equivalence. Finally, references to several cultural aspects, such as habits, customs, and traditions, were adapted to fit the new cultural context. The UCLA program may be a promising tool to help alleviate the cognitive difficulties reported by cancer survivors in different cultural contexts. Future research is needed to confirm the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of its Portuguese version, "CanCOG^®-Reabilitação Cognitiva no Cancro".

Effect of cognitive training on patients with breast cancer reporting cognitive changes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Cognitive training is a non-drug intervention to improve the cognitive function of participants by training them in different cognitive domains. We investigated the effectiveness of cognitive training for patients with breast cancer reporting cognitive changes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WOS, CINAHL, CNKI, VIP, SinoMed, Wanfang, Grey literature and trial registries were searched (from inception to 1 October 1, 2022).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of cognitive training on breast cancer patients reporting cognitive changes The primary outcome was subjective cognitive function. Secondary outcomes were objective cognitive functioning (eg, executive functioning and attention) and psychological outcomes(eg, anxiety, depression, and fatigue).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers worked independently to screen the literature, extract data, and assess the methodological quality and risk bias of the included studies. Results are reported as standardizedstandardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals(CI). Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation(GRADE) were used to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was subjective cognitive function. Secondary outcomes were objective cognitive functioning (eg, executive functioning and attention) and psychological outcomes(eg, anxiety, depression and fatigue).

RESULTS

A total of 9 RCTs involving 666 patients with breast cancer were included. The frequency of cognitive training varied and the duration was mostly focused on 5-12 weeks. It can be delivered to patients in an individual or group mode, both online and face to face. Meta-analysis revealed that cognitive training aimed at adaptive training in cognitive field has statistically significant effects on improving subjective cognitive function (SMD=0.30, 95% CI (0.08 to 0.51), moderate certainty). Some objective cognitive functions such as processing speed (SMD=0.28, 95% CI (0.02 to 0.54), low certainty), verbal memory (SMD=0.32, 95% CI (0.05 to 0.58), moderate certainty), working memory (SMD=0.39, 95% CI (0.17 to 0.61), moderate certainty) and episodic memory (SMD=0.40, 95% CI (0.11 to 0.69), moderate certainty) were significantly improved after the intervention. In addition, we did not find statistically significant changes in attention, short-term memory, execution function, depression, anxiety and fatigue in patients with breast cancer after the intervention. Subgroup analyses revealed that based on the delivery of individual sessions, the use of web-based cognitive training software may be more beneficial in improving the outcome of the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Evidence of low to moderate certainty suggests that cognitive training may improve subjective cognition, processing speed, verbal memory, working memory and episodic memory in patients with breast cancer reporting cognitive changes. But it did not improve patients' attention, short-term memory, executive function, depression, anxiety and fatigue.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021264316.

Factors associated with perceived cognitive impairment in patients with advanced lung cancer: a cross-sectional analysis

PURPOSE

Perceived cognitive impairment refers to cognitive dysfunction that particularly involves impairment in working or short-term memory, and inattention. This study aimed to identify factors associated with perceived cognitive impairment in patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

This cross-sectional analysis used pooled data from a prospective, ongoing randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of exercise in patients with advanced lung cancer (Trial Registration: NCT04119778). Patients diagnosed with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer were recruited from three public hospitals in Hong Kong between December 2018 and December 2021. Demographics, daily step count, sleep quality, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and perceived cognitive impairment were included in the analyses. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the most critical risk factors associated with perceived cognitive impairments in attention and memory.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients were included and analyzed, 35.4% of patients had perceived attention impairment and 58.4% had perceived memory impairment. The daily step count (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.496; confidence interval [CI] = 0.258-0.954), fatigue (aOR = 1.342; CI = 1.903-1.648), and anxiety (aOR = 1.179; CI = 1.042-1.335) were associated with a significantly increased risk of perceived attention impairment, while anxiety (aOR = 1.126; CI = 1.008-1.257) was identified as the most significant factor for perceived memory impairment.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study can inform the design of effective interventions to reduce perceived cognitive impairment and promote the quality of life and well-being of patients with advanced lung cancer.