Growth performance and carcass traits of pigs subjected to marginal dietary restrictions during the grower phase

A review of compensatory growth following lysine restriction in grow-finish pigs

Compensatory growth induced by lysine (Lys) restriction in grow-finish pigs is a complex physiological process affected by many factors and interactions, principally genotype, stage of growth at restriction, nature of nutritional restriction, and patterns of restriction and recovery. The scarcity of standard comparisons across the literature has hindered the characterization of important determinants of compensatory growth. Therefore, the present publication aims to review the current state of knowledge on compensatory growth induced by Lys restriction in grow-finish pigs, develop a database from peer-reviewed literature to standardize comparisons to characterize the occurrence of compensatory growth, and provide practical considerations for compensatory growth under field conditions. The literature search focused on publications directly or indirectly evaluating compensatory growth by having a period of Lys restriction followed by a recovery period of Lys sufficiency for grow-finish pigs. The database included 14 publications and 57 comparisons expressed as relative differences of restricted pigs compared to nonrestricted pigs. The database analysis described compensatory growth into complete, incomplete, and no compensatory growth categories and characterized the patterns of restriction and recovery in each category. The review of literature and database analysis supports the occurrence of compensatory growth induced by Lys restriction in grow-finish pigs. The degree of Lys restriction and duration of restriction and recovery periods seem to be critical in explaining differences between complete and incomplete compensatory growth, whereas Lys level in the recovery period seems to be critical between incomplete or no compensatory growth. Compensatory growth seems to be more likely if: 1) the degree of Lys restriction is between 10% and 30%; 2) Lys restriction is induced before pigs reach their maximum protein deposition; 3) duration of Lys restriction is short (maximum 40–45% overall duration) and duration of recovery period is long (minimum 55–60% overall duration); and 4) Lys level in recovery is close to or above the estimated requirements. In addition, compensatory growth can occur under commercial conditions and there seems to be an opportunity to exploit compensatory growth in grow-finish pigs to reduce feed cost and improve feed efficiency under certain market conditions.

The effects of a temporary lysine restriction in newly weaned pigs on growth performance and body composition1

A serial slaughter study was conducted to determine the effects of a temporary Lys restriction immediately following weaning on growth performance and body composition. One hundred forty-four Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc pigs (initial BW: 6.9 ± 0.2 kg) were randomly allocated to one of three dietary treatments (six pens per treatment with eight pigs per pen; four barrows and four gilts). For a 3-wk restriction period, pigs were fed diets that were 110% (Control) of the estimated required standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys for nursery pigs or 20% (Lys20) or 40% (Lys40) below the estimated required SID Lys. Thereafter, all pigs were fed a common grower diet containing 120% of the estimated required SID Lys for 6 wk (recovery period). During the restriction period, ADG and G:F decreased with decreasing dietary Lys concentration (linear; P < 0.01). At the end of the restriction period, BW and whole-body protein concentrations decreased (linear; P < 0.01) and carcass lipid concentrations increased (linear; P < 0.01) with decreasing dietary Lys concentration. During the first 3 wk of the recovery period, ADG and G:F increased (linear; P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) and whole-body protein concentration at week 3 of the recovery period decreased (linear; P < 0.01) with decreasing dietary Lys concentration. There were no dietary treatment differences in whole-body lipid concentration after 3 wk of the recovery period. During the second half of the recovery period (weeks 7 through 9), there were no differences in ADG or G:F; after week 6, there were no differences in final BW (50.3 ± 0.5 kg) or whole-body protein (16.9 ± 0.2%) or lipid (14.9 ± 0.7%) concentrations. In conclusion, newly weaned pigs previously fed a Lys-limiting diet for 3 wk immediately after weaning achieved full compensatory growth with no differences in BW or body composition after a 6-wk recovery period. Reducing dietary Lys concentration early after weaning is a potential means to reduce the cost of (early) nursery diets without impacting overall growth and carcass composition.

The compensatorily-gained pigs resulted from feeding a methionine-deficient diet had more fat and less lean body mass

Compensatory gain describes an accelerated growth seen in animals following a period of nutrient restriction. Methionine (Met) is the second limiting amino acid in typical swine diets and is essential for muscle growth. This study was conducted to determine (1) if a Met-deficient diet can cause growth retardation in growing pigs, (2) if returning to a normal feeding can yield compensatory gain in the pigs previously fed the Met-deficient diet, and (3) if this Met-deficiency followed by the normal feeding program affects carcass characteristics. Twenty individually-penned crossbred young barrows were randomly allotted to two dietary treatments (n = 10). One Met-deficient (D1) and one Met-adequate (D2) diets were formulated based on corn and soybean meal and fed to respective pigs for 31 days. After that, all pigs were fed the same commercial grower-finisher diet until market weight (around 125 kg), then slaughtered, and carcass characteristics measured. The D1 and D2 pigs began with similar body weights (23.5 vs. 23.6 kg; P = 0.935), but after 31-days on the dietary treatments, D1 pigs were lighter than D2 pigs (51.6 vs. 55.0 kg; P = 0.102). After feeding the normal diet for 55 days, D1 and D2 pigs had similar body weights (122.7 vs. 122.6 kg; P = 0.989). In terms of carcass characteristics, however, D1 pigs had thicker back-fat (at 10th rib; 2.95 vs. 2.51 cm; P = 0.015), heavier belly weight (11.0 vs. 9.6 kg; P = 0.005), lighter ham weights (untrimmed: 20.8 vs. 21.6 kg; P = 0.043; trimmed: 19.6 vs. 20.6 kg; P = 0.016), lighter picnic shoulder weight (8.72 vs. 9.80 kg; P = 0.041), lighter total lean cut weight (51.8 vs. 53.8 kg; P = 0.055), and lower lean cut percentage (56.4 vs. 59.0%; P = 0.012). These results indicate that the Met-deficient diet produced growth-retarded pigs, which showed compensatory gain after the normal feeding. At slaughter, the pigs previously fed the Met-deficient diet had more fat and less lean tissue than their non-deficient counterparts.

Effect of standardized ileal digestible lysine on growth and subsequent performance of weanling pigs

A total of 320 weanling pigs (all barrows, initially 5.71 kg BW; Line 1050, PIC Hendersonville, TN) were used to determine whether the Lys level fed during one phase of the nursery influences the response to Lys during subsequent phases. Our hypothesis was that feeding decreasing dietary Lys concentration in early phases, but feeding adequate concentrations in later phases might result in similar pig growth as those fed a more conventional approach with step-wise decreases in dietary Lys as pigs become heavier. Eight dietary regimens were used in a split-plot design. There were three dietary phases, and within phase, a high or low standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys diet was fed. Pigs were fed either 1.35% or 1.55% SID Lys during phase 1 (days 0 to 7), 1.15% or 1.35% SID Lys in phase 2 (days 7 to 21), and 1.05 or 1.25% SID Lys during phase 3 (days 21 to 35). The low dietary Lys concentrations were achieved by reducing both crystalline Lys and intact protein sources from the high Lys diets. From days 0 to 7, feeding high SID Lys improved (P < 0.01) G:F, but no evidence for differences in ADG or ADFI were observed. Similarly, from days 7 to 21, there were no evidence for differences in ADG or ADFI among pigs fed the two Lys levels, but those fed high SID Lys had improved (P < 0.03) G:F. From days 21 to 35, pigs fed the high Lys diet had increased (P < 0.01) ADG and G:F compared with those fed low SID Lys, but there were no effects on ADFI. For the overall trial (days 0 to 35), there were no dietary interactions among phases, indicating that the Lys level fed in each phase did not influence the response to Lys in subsequent phases. Thus, pigs fed the high Lys level during phase 3, regardless of previous Lys levels in phases 1 and 2, had greater (P < 0.05) overall ADG and G:F compared with other treatment groups. In conclusion, relatively low dietary Lys concentrations can be fed in the early nursery phases (approximately 6 to 12 kg) without any negative impact on overall growth performance provided that adequate Lys levels are fed thereafter (12 to 20 kg).

Effect of a lysine depletion-repletion protocol on the compensatory growth of growing-finishing pigs

The effect of Lys restriction followed by a repletion period on the performance of growing pigs was studied during 3 feeding phases, each lasting 28 d. A total of 47 castrated male pigs (G Performer 8.0 × Fertilis 25 pigs; Genetiporc Inc., Saint-Bernard, QC, Canada; initial BW of 26.7 ± 2.7 kg) were given each d 70% or 100% of their Lys requirements according to 1 of the following 5 sequences: 70-70-70, 70-70-100, 70-100-70, 70-100-100, or 100-100-100 (for each sequence, numbers indicate the Lys supply percentage in phase 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Individual Lys requirements were estimated daily on the basis of each pig's actual BW and feed intake and BW gain patterns obtained by regression using each pig's historical data. At the end of phase 1, the pigs given 100% of their Lys requirements had higher ADFI ( = 0.01), ADG ( < 0.01), and average daily protein deposition ( < 0.01) than did the pigs given 70% of their requirements. Similar results were observed during phases 2 and 3. At the end of phase 2, the pigs in the 70-100 sequence did not display any compensatory response, given that their ADFI, ADG, and average daily protein deposition did not differ from those of the pigs in the 100-100 sequence. Similar results were observed during phase 3. Although no compensatory growth was observed during the growing phases, the fact that the pigs in the 70-100-100 treatment were able to catch up in terms of BW and body protein mass to the pigs in the 100-100-100 sequence could indicate that a small degree of compensation did occur; these research results cannot ascertain that any compensatory growth occurred.

Effect of lysine to digestible energy ratio on growth performance and carcass characteristics in finishing pigs

This experiment was performed to investigate the effects of lysine (Lys) to DE ratio on growth performance, and carcass characterics in finishing barrows. Ninety six cross-bred finishing barrows ((Landrace×Yorkshire) ×Duroc, average BW 58.25±0.48 kg) were assigned as a randomized complete block design by 2 energy levels and 4 Lys:DE ratios on the basis of BW to one of 8 treatments with 3 replications with 4 animals per pen. The levels of DE and Lys:DE ratio for each treatment were i) DE 3.35 Mcal/kg, 1.5 g Lys/Mcal DE, ii) DE 3.35 Mcal/kg, 1.8 g Lys/Mcal DE, iii) DE 3.35 Mcal/kg, 2.1 g Lys/Mcal DE, iv) DE 3.35 Mcal/kg, 2.4 g Lys/Mcal DE, v) DE 3.60 Mcal/kg, 1.5 g Lys/Mcal DE, vi) DE 3.60 Mcal/kg, 1.8 g Lys/Mcal DE, vii) DE 3.60 Mcal/kg, 2.1 g Lys/Mcal DE, viii) DE 3.60 Mcal/kg, 2.4 g Lys/Mcal DE. During finishing period from 58 kg to 103 kg of BW, increased energy density in the diet increased (p<0.05) ADG and gain:feed ratio, but did not influence ADFI. As Lys:DE ratio was increased, ADG, ADFI and gain:feed ratio were improved in finishing barrows (p<0.05). There were positive interactions (p<0.05) between carcass weight, grade, and backfat thickness and energy density and Lys level (p<0.05). In conclusion, data from our current study suggest that maximum yields including ADG, gain:feed ratio, carcass weight and grade can be achieved by administrating finishing pigs with an ideal Lys:DE ratio, Lys 2.1 g/DE Mcal.

Effect of amino acid level in the pig diet during growing and early finishing on growth response during the late finishing phase of lean meat type gilts

BACKGROUND

This experiment examined the influence of different amino acid levels during the growing and early finishing diet and the late finishing diet on growth performance and carcass quality of a lean meat type gilt. In a two by two factorial trial, 96 gilts were divided over four treatments. The two factors were (1) amino acid level in growing and early finishing and (2) amino acid level in late finishing. For the low amino acid diets we lowered the lysine, methionine, threonine and tryptophan levels by 20% and 30% in the growing and two finishing phases, respectively.

RESULTS

Restricting amino acid levels in growing and early finishing led to a decreased growth rate but improved efficiency of amino acid use, which lasted into the subsequent phase. Pigs on a high amino acid diet in late finishing pigs were able to compensate to a large extent for amino acid restriction in growing and early finishing. Amino acid content in late finishing determined carcass quality.

CONCLUSION

In the lean meat type gilts used in this experiment, restricting amino acid concentrations by 20% in the growing and 30% in the early finishing phase increased the growth rate and efficiency of growth in the subsequent late finishing phase. In order to obtain good carcass quality, it is crucial to provide the animals with a balanced diet during the late finishing phase.

Effect of decreasing ideal protein levels on performance results and nitrogen efficiency of growing-finishing gilts

This study examined the effect of decreasing ideal protein concentrations on performance and nutrient efficiency. The experimental diets contained 100%, 90%, 80% or 70% of the ideal dietary protein level (Diet 100%, 90%, 80% and 70%, respectively) estimated in previous experiments with pigs of the same genetic background. The four different treatments were divided among 16 pens of six pigs each. The average initial and final body weight were 20.8 +/- 1.1 and 107 +/- 3 kg, respectively. Three-phase feeding was applied (BW 20-40 kg, 40-70 kg and 70-110 kg). The dietary ileal digestible (ID) methionine + cystine, threonine, tryptophan, isoleucine, valine, and leucine contents expressed as percent of ID lysine were 63, 72, 22, 60, 68, and > 100%, respectively. The lysine to protein ratio was kept constant at 6.8%. Between 21 and 106 kg BW the best performance was achieved on Diet 90%. Diet 70% led to significantly worse results. Although lean meat percentage did not differ, protein content of the carcass was lower on Diet 70% than on Diets 90% and 100%. Decreased protein concentrations increased crude protein efficiency and consequently decreased nitrogen excretion most at the 80% level. If protein varies together with digestible amino acid content, it can be concluded that Diet 80% may be the best choice for the environment and for profitability. If protein content stays at a fixed level, Diet 90% may be the safest choice.

Effect of the degree and duration of early dietary amino acid restrictions on subsequent and overall pig performance and physical and sensory characteristics of pork

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the degree and duration of early dietary AA restrictions on subsequent and overall pig performance and physical and sensory characteristics of pork. For the grower (G) and finisher-1 (F1) phases, 3 corn-soybean meal diets were formulated to contain 100, 80, or 60% of the 1998 NRC total Lys recommendations (100G, 80G, or 60G, and 100F1, 80F1, or 60F1, for the G and F1 phases, respectively). For the finisher-2 (F2) phase, a common corn-soybean meal diet was formulated to satisfy the 1998 NRC total Lys recommendation. Thirty gilts and 30 castrated males (2 gilts or 2 castrated males/pen) were randomly assigned to 5 dietary treatments (100G-100F1, 80G-100F1, 80G-80F1, 60G-100F1, and 60G-60F1) when BW was 22.7 +/- 0.3 kg. Pigs were switched to F1 and F2 diets at 50.7 +/- 0.4 and 79.9 +/- 0.5 kg of BW, respectively. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water. All pigs were slaughtered at 110.7 +/- 0.5 kg of BW, and LM samples were collected. Pigs fed the 60G diet had less (P < or = 0.05) ADG during the G phase and greater (P < or = 0.05) ultrasound backfat (UBF) at the end of the G phase than those fed the 100G diet. The ADG decreased linearly (R(2) = 0.70; P < 0.001) as the degree of AA restrictions became more severe. Although serum total protein (TP) and albumin concentrations in pigs fed the 60G-100F1 diets were less (P < or = 0.05) than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets at the end of the G phase, TP concentration was similar between the 2 groups at the end of the F1 phase. Likewise, ADG during the F1 phase and UBF at the end of the F1 phase in pigs fed the 60G-100F1 diets were similar to those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. Feeding the 80G diet resulted in numerically decreased ADG during the G phase, but there was no difference in ADG during the F1 and F2 phases or UBF at the end of F1 and F2 phases between pigs fed the 80G and 100G diets. Overall, pigs fed the 80G-80F1 diets had similar ADG, but less (P < or = 0.05) fat-free lean gain (LG) than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. These pigs also had less (P < or = 0.05) serum TP and albumin concentrations than pigs fed the 100G-100F1 diets throughout the study. Pigs fed the 60G-60F1 diets had less (P < or = 0.05) overall ADG and G:F and less (P < or = 0.05) LM area and LG than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. However, they had a greater (P < or = 0.05) subjective marbling score than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. The results indicated that pigs fed the 80G-80F1 diets may have exhibited compensatory growth in BW gain, but not in terms of lean accretion. Growth performance and carcass traits of pigs fed the 60G-60F1 diets were reduced, indicating that the restriction may have been too severe or too long or both. Early dietary AA restrictions had no clear effect on physical and sensory characteristics of pork.

Dynamics of body protein deposition and changes in body composition after sudden changes in amino acid intake: I. Barrows

A study was conducted to evaluate the extent and dynamics of whole body protein deposition and changes in chemical and physical body composition after a period of AA intake restriction in growing barrows with medium lean tissue growth potentials. Forty Yorkshire barrows (initial BW 14.4 +/- 1.6 kg) were scale-fed at 75% of estimated voluntary daily DE intake up to 35 kg of BW and assigned to 1 of 2 diets: AA adequate (AA+; 20% above requirements; NRC, 1998) and AA deficient (AA-; 40% below requirements; restriction phase). Thereafter (re-alimentation phase), pigs from both dietary AA levels were scale-fed or fed ad libitum diets that were not limiting in AA. Body weight gain and body composition, based on serial slaughter, were monitored during the 34-d re-alimentation phase. During the restriction phase AA intake restriction reduced BW gains (556 vs. 410 g/d; P < 0.001; AA+ and AA-, respectively). At 35 kg of BW, AA intake restriction increased whole body lipid content (11.1 vs. 17.5% of empty BW; P < 0.05) and the whole body lipid to body protein ratio (0.65 vs. 1.20; P < 0.01) and reduced body protein content (17.1 vs. 14.6% of empty BW; P < 0.01) and body water content (68.2 vs. 63.9%; P < 0.05). The relationships between body protein vs. body water and body protein vs. body ash content were not altered by previous AA intake restriction or by feeding level during the re-alimentation phase (P > 0.10). Throughout the re-alimentation phase, there were no interactive effects of time, feeding level, and previous AA intake level on growth performance, body protein, and body lipid content (P > 0.10). During the re-alimentation phase, body protein deposition, derived from the linear regression analysis of body protein content vs. time, was not affected by feeding level and previous AA intake level (P > 0.10; 156 g/d for AA- vs. 157 g/d for AA+). Based on BW and body protein content, it can be concluded that no compensatory body protein deposition occurred in barrows, with medium lean tissue growth potential after AA intake restriction between 15 and 35 kg of BW. It is suggested that the upper limit to body protein deposition was the main factor that limited the extent of compensatory body protein deposition in this population of pigs. The concept of an upper limit to body protein deposition may be used to explain why compensatory growth is observed in some studies and not in others.

Dynamics of body protein deposition and changes in body composition after sudden changes in amino acid intake: II. Entire male pigs

A study was conducted to evaluate the extent and dynamics of whole body protein deposition (Pd) and changes in chemical and physical body composition after a period of AA intake restriction in entire male pigs with high lean-tissue growth potentials. Fifty-eight entire male pigs (initial BW 15.8 +/- 0.9 kg) were allotted to 1 of 3 dietary AA levels between 15 and 38 kg of BW: control (15% above requirements), AA-15% (15% below requirements), and AA-30% (30% below requirements). Thereafter, pigs were fed diets not limiting in AA content. Throughout the experiment, pigs were scale-fed at 90% of estimated voluntary daily DE intake. Representative pigs were slaughtered at 15, 38, 53, 68, or 110 kg of BW to monitor changes in body composition. Between 15 and 38 kg of BW, restriction of AA intake reduced BW gain (P < 0.01; 794, 666, and 648 g/d for control, AA-15%, and AA-30%, respectively). At 38 kg of BW, AA intake restriction increased whole body lipid (LB) content (P < 0.01; 11.3, 14.3, 17.5% of empty BW), and the LB-to-whole body protein (PB) ratio (LB/PB; P < 0.02; 0.68, 0.88, 1.10 for control, AA-15%, and AA-30%, respectively). Relationships between PB versus whole body water and PB versus whole body ash were not affected by dietary treatments (P > 0.10). At 110 kg of BW and based on BW, PB, and LB/PB, complete compensatory growth (CG) was achieved. Body weight gain between 38 and 110 kg of BW was inversely related to previous dietary AA levels (P < 0.01; 1,089, 1,171, and 1,185 g/d for control, AA-15%, and AA-30%, respectively). For pigs on the control diet, and based on N-balance data, Pd increased with BW, from 172 g/d at 40 kg of BW to 226 g/d at 82 kg of BW. At 40 kg of BW, Pd was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs on the AA-15% (205 g/d) and AA-30% (191 g/d) diets than pigs on the control diet (172 g/d). These findings indicate that pigs with high lean-tissue growth potentials are more likely to express compensatory Pd and their genetically determined upper limit to Pd (PdMax) after a period of AA intake restriction. This study confirms previous findings that BW effects on PdMax are small in growing pigs between 40 and 80 kg of BW. It is suggested that CG and compensatory Pd after a period of AA intake restriction is constrained by the pig's PdMax and is driven by a target LB/PB. Combined with previous observations in our laboratory, these results suggest that CG after a period of AA intake restriction tends to occur only when pigs are within the energy-dependent phase of lean-tissue growth and not when the genetically determined upper limit to lean-tissue growth, or PdMax, determines growth performance.

Effects of frequent out-of-feed events on growth performance of nursery and grow-finish pigs1

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate effects of out-of-feed events on nursery and grow-finish pig performance. An out-of-feed event is a period of time that pigs do not have access to feed as a result of late feed delivery or bridging in bulk bins, feed lines, or feeders. In these studies, we created an out-of-feed event by removing the feeders from pens or preventing access to the feeder. In Exp. 1, 190 pigs (initially 6.4 +/- 1.6 kg and 21 +/- 3 d of age) were used in a 35-d growth study. Treatments involved a 20-h feed withdrawal for 1, 2, or 3 randomly selected times or a control treatment where feeders were never withdrawn. Feeders were withdrawn on d 11 for pigs with 1 out-of-feed event, d 8 and 23 for pigs with 2 out-of-feed events, and d 9, 14, and 20 for pigs with 3 out-of-feed events. There was a treatment (P < 0.06) effect only during weeks in which an out-of-feed event occurred. Growth rate was lower (P < 0.05) for pigs with 1 out-of-feed event (d 11) compared with control in the d 8 to 14 period. During the same period, those pigs with the first of 2 (d 8) or 3 (d 9) out-of-feed events had intermediate ADG. In the d 15 to 21 period, only pigs with the second and third of 3 out-of-feed events (d 15 and 20) had lower growth performance compared with control pigs, whereas growth performance was similar to the control for those with 1 or 2 out-of-feed events. Pigs with 3 out-of-feed events had greater ADG and G:F (P < 0.05) compared with the other 3 treatments for the d 22 to 28 period. For the overall study (d 0 to 35), there were no differences (P > 0.86) in growth performance among pigs with 0, 1, 2, or 3 out-of-feed events. In Exp. 2, 479 pigs (initially 41.6 +/- 4 kg) were used in an 85-d growth study. Treatments involved feed withdrawal (20 h) weekly for the duration of the study; feed withdrawn weekly from d 45 to 85; or a control treatment where pigs had access to feed for the duration of the experiment. Feed withdrawal occurred on a randomly selected day with the exception of Saturday, Sunday, or a day before a weigh day (usually a Thursday every other week). From d 0 to 45, 46 to 85, and the overall d 0 to 85 period, there were no differences (P > 0.12) in ADG, ADFI, G:F, or average final BW among treatments. Results suggest that out-of-feed events of 20 h or less have no long-term detrimental effects on growth performance in nursery or grow-finish pigs.

Reduced protein intake during the weaner period has variable effects on subsequent growth and carcass composition of pigs

In total, 960 pigs (480 castrated males and 480 gilts), selected at ~28 days of age, were used to investigate the effect of restricting protein intake for a short period between 4 and 14 weeks of age. Pigs were selected over an 8-week period in groups of 120 pigs (three pens of 20 castrated males and three pens of 20 gilts per week). Pigs were given ad libitum access to commercial diets from weaning to slaughter. Pens of 20 pigs of each sex were allocated to one of six treatments: control (no restriction), restriction from 4 to 7 weeks of age, restriction from 7 to 10 weeks of age, restriction from 10 to 14 weeks of age, restriction from 4 to 10 weeks of age or a restriction from 4 to 14 weeks of age. During the period of restriction, pigs were offered ad libitum commercial diets that had been reduced in dietary lysine to digestible energy ratio by ~15%. Restricting protein intake between 7 and 10, 4 and 10 and 4 and 14 weeks of age reduced daily gain during the period of restriction. Pigs restricted from 7 to 10 weeks of age had reduced average daily feed intake (5.6%) from 7 to 10 weeks, followed by a reduction in average daily feed intake (5.5%) and improved feed efficiency (6.1%) in the subsequent period from 10 to 17 weeks of age. Daily gain for the entire experimental period was similar for all treatment groups, except those restricted from 7 to 10 weeks of age (3.9% lower than the controls), although there was no treatment effect on carcass weight. Interestingly, backfat was reduced by 10% in these animals compared with the controls, which may be economically beneficial in markets where producers are paid on backfat and carcass weight, such as those selling domestically in the Australian market. Economic benefits of reduced feed costs during both the restriction and realimentation periods were also observed when pigs were restricted from 10 to 14 weeks of age. Any economic benefits from short periods of protein restriction will vary depending on the specific market conditions and the local cost of feed protein sources.

Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs

An experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1). This adaptation period was followed by a 7-d period (P2), in which 1 pig of each block continued to receive feed at the same level of feeding, whereas for its littermate a 40% reduction in feed intake was imposed (i.e., 1.55 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1)). During the subsequent 7-d period (P3), both pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1). After P3, pigs were fasted for 1 d. Heat production (HP) was measured for all pigs during the last 3 d of P1 and on all days for P2 and P3. Heat production was measured using an open-circuit respiration chamber. Energy and N balances were determined for P1, P2, and P3. The HP was partitioned into HP due to physical activity, the short-term thermic effect of feeding, and resting HP. Feed restriction during P2 decreased (P < 0.01) total HP, resting HP, short-term thermic effect of feeding, and retained energy, whereas HP due to physical activity was not affected by feed restriction (P = 0.50). Likewise, fecal and urinary N loss, protein gain, lipid gain, and ADG were reduced during feed restriction (P < 0.01). There were no differences in components of HP and metabolic utilization of energy between the 2 groups during P1 and P3. Nevertheless, urinary N loss was decreased (P < 0.05) and ADG increased (P < 0.01) during P3 for pigs that were restricted in P2. Compensatory growth after a period of feed restriction does not seem to be related to a change in the metabolic utilization of energy for gain but more likely is due to gain in water and gut contents.

Compensatory growth and nitrogen balance in grower-finisher pigs

Sixteen castrated male pigs (averaging 21.2 +/- 4.9 kg) were used in two trials to investigate the effect of dietary amino acid content during the grower phase on growth performance and N balance. In each trial, pigs were assigned randomly to corn-soybean meal grower diets formulated to contain 5.0 or 11.0 g lysine/kg (as-fed basis). Common Finisher 1 and 2 diets were offered when pigs reached 51.2 +/- 3.3 and 79.5 +/- 3.4 kg, respectively. Pigs were placed in metabolism crates for a 9-d period during each of the grower, Finisher 1, and Finisher 2 phases when they weighed 43.3 +/- 3.9, 70.4 +/- 4.9, and 90.5 +/- 3.8 kg, respectively, to determine N balance. Blood samples were taken from each pig periodically after an overnight fast. Pigs were allowed ad libitum access to feed and water, except during the three adaptation/collection periods. There were no diet x trial interactions; thus, the data were combined. Pigs fed the low-amino acid grower diet grew more slowly and less efficiently (P < 0.001) during the grower phase and had more ultrasound backfat (P = 0.010) at the end of the grower phase than those fed the high-amino acid grower diet. During the Finisher 1 phase, however, pigs fed the low-amino acid diet grew more efficiently (P = 0.012) than those fed the high-amino acid diet, and the grower diet had no effect on overall weight gain, carcass traits, lean accretion, or meat quality scores. Although pigs fed the low-amino acid diet had less serum urea N (P < 0.001) and more glucose (P = 0.009) at 43.3 kg, there seemed to be no clear, long-term effect of the grower diet on serum metabolites. During the grower phase, pigs fed the high-amino acid diet consumed more N (P < 0.001), had higher apparent N digestibility (P = 0.041), N utilization (P = 0.027), and N retention (P < 0.001), and excreted more fecal (P = 0.034) and urinary (P < 0.001) N than those fed the low-amino acid diet. Pigs fed the low-amino acid grower diet, however, had a higher N utilization (P = 0.024) during the Finisher 1 phase, and excreted less urinary N during both the Finisher 1 (P = 0.029) and 2 (P = 0.027) phases than those fed the high-amino acid grower diet. These results indicate that pigs subjected to early dietary amino acid restrictions compensated completely and decreased N excretion during both the restriction and realimentation phases. Compensatory growth can, therefore, have a positive effect not only on the overall efficiency of pig production but also on environment.

Effect of dietary protein fluctuations and space allocation on performance and carcass quality of growing-finishing pigs1

Two trials with growing-finishing pigs were conducted to evaluate the effects of fluctuating dietary CP levels and/or space allocation on performance and carcass traits. In Trial 1, three CP regimens were used with 216 growing-finishing pigs (mixed sex). Average initial and final weights of pigs were 31 and 103 kg, respectively. The CP regimens consisted of: 1) control (18% CP from wk 0 to 4; 15% CP from wk 4 to 12); 2) moderate CP variations (MCPV = 19.5% CP from wk 0 to 2, 16.5% CP from wk 2 to 6, 13.5% CP from wk 6 to 8, 16.5% CP from wk 8 to 10, 13.5% CP from wk 10 to 12); and 3) extreme CP variations (ECPV = 21% CP from wk 0 to 2, 15% CP from wk 2 to 4, 18% CP from wk 4 to 6, 12% CP from wk 6 to 8, 18% CP from wk 8 to 10, 12% CP from wk 10 to 12). Overall (wk 0 to 12), treatment differences were not observed (P > 0.05) for gain, feed intake, CP intake, gain:feed ratio, or gain/CP intake. Trial 2 involved 360 finishing pigs (mixed sex) in a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement (three dietary CP regimens, two floor space allowances). The diets consisted of: 1) control (16% CP from wk 0 to 4, 15% CP from wk 4 to 8; 14% CP from wk 8 to 12); 2) MCPV (17.5% CP from wk 0 to 2, 14.5% CP from wk 2 to 4, 16.5% CP from wk 4 to 6, 13.5% CP from wk 6 to 8, 15.5% CP from wk 8 to 10, 12.5% CP from wk 10 to 12); and 3) ECPV (19% CP from wk 0 to 2, 13% CP from wk 2 to 4, 18% CP from wk 4 to 6, 12% CP from wk 6 to 8, 17% CP from wk 8 to 10 wk, 11% CP from wk 10 to 12). Pigs were provided with either 1.12 m2 (uncrowded; five pigs/pen) or 0.56 m2 (crowded; 10 pigs/pen). Average initial weight was 49 kg and final weights were 126 kg (uncrowded) and 118 kg (crowded). Overall (0 to 12 wk), crowded pigs had lower (P < 0.05) ADG (822 vs. 916 g) and feed (as-fed) intakes (2,633 vs. 2,876 g) than uncrowded pigs. At the end of the 12-wk trial, a control vs. ECPV x space interaction (P < 0.05) occurred for weight gain, fat depth, and percentage of lean. Thus, uncrowded pigs fed ECPV gained faster (933 vs. 887 g) but had a lower percentage of lean (53.5 vs. 54.5) than controls, whereas crowded pigs on the ECPV regimen gained more slowly (812 vs. 842 g) but were leaner (54.8 vs. 54.6%) than those on the control CP regimen. Despite the wide dietary CP fluctuations, pigs in both trials consumed about the same quantity of CP during the 12-wk feeding periods. These data suggest that uncrowded pigs respond differently than crowded pigs to fluctuating levels of dietary CP.