Clinical efficacy of umifenovir in influenza and ARVI (study ARBITR)

Retracted and republished from: "The current state of research on influenza antiviral drug development: drugs in clinical trial and licensed drugs"

Influenza viruses (IVs) threaten global human health due to the high morbidity, infection, and mortality rates. Currently, the influenza drugs recommended by the Food and Drug Administration are oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and baloxavir marboxil. These recommended antivirals are currently effective for major subtypes of IVs as the compounds target conserved domains in neuraminidase or polymerase acidic (PA) protein. However, this trend may gradually change due to the selection of antiviral drugs and the natural evolution of IVs. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop drugs related to the treatment of influenza to deal with the next pandemic. Here, we summarized the cutting-edge research in mechanism of action, inhibitory activity, and clinical efficacy of drugs that have been approved and drugs that are still in clinical trials for influenza treatment. We hope this review will provide up-to-date and comprehensive information on influenza antivirals and generate hypotheses for screens and development of new broad-spectrum influenza drugs in the near future.

Passive immunotherapies for the next influenza pandemic

Influenzavirus is among the most relevant candidates for a next pandemic. We review here the phylogeny of former influenza pandemics, and discuss candidate lineages. After briefly reviewing the other existing antiviral options, we discuss in detail the evidences supporting the efficacy of passive immunotherapies against influenzavirus, with a focus on convalescent plasma.

[Application of HS221GI in treatment of influenza and ARVI in adults: a new approach - managing virus-induced inflammation. Results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial]

AIM

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the drug Aterixen® (XC221GI, 1-[2-(1-methylimidazole-4-yl)-ethyl]perhydroazine-2,6-dione), in the treatment of uncomplicated forms of influenza and other ARVI in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The phase III clinical trial enrolled 260 people aged 18-65 years with mild and moderate forms of influenza or other ARVI. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: in group 1 (n=130), patients were prescribed the drug Aterixen® in tablets of 100 mg 2 times a day for 5 days; in group 2 (n=130) - a placebo corresponding to the drug, in the same regimen. The primary endpoint of the efficacy assessment was the time in hours from the first administration of the drug to clinical improvement. The main efficacy analysis was performed in a population of patients with PCR-confirmed influenza or ARVI who completed the study according to the protocol (per protocol infected). Additionally, efficacy was evaluated in ITT and PP populations, including patients with both identified and undetected pathogen. The population for safety analysis included all patients, without exception, who were exposed to at least one exposure to the study drug or placebo.

RESULTS

A statistically significant superiority of the drug Aterixen® over placebo in primary endpoint was revealed in both the main and additional analysis in all studied populations: clinical improvement in the group of the studied drug occurred 24 hours faster compared with the placebo group. The evaluation of the effectiveness of secondary endpoints confirmed the superiority of the drug Aterixen® over placebo in terms of relief of catarrhal symptoms and symptoms of intoxication. A favorable safety profile of the drug has been demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

The drug has demonstrated a favorable safety profile for use in outpatient practice. Aterixen® is an effective and safe treatment for influenza and other ARVI in adults.

The current state of research on influenza antiviral drug development: drugs in clinical trial and licensed drugs

Influenza viruses (IVs) threaten global human health due to the high morbidity, infection, and mortality rates. Currently, the influenza drugs recommended by the FDA are oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir, and baloxavir marboxil. Notably, owing to the high variability of IVs, no drug exists that can effectively treat all types and subtypes of IVs. Moreover, the current trend of drug resistance is likely to continue as the viral genome is constantly mutating. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop drugs related to the treatment of influenza to deal with the next pandemic. Here, we summarized the cutting-edge research in mechanism of action, inhibitory activity, and clinical efficacy of drugs that have been approved and drugs that are still in clinical trials for influenza treatment. We hope this review will provide up-to-date and comprehensive information on influenza antivirals and generate hypotheses for screens and development of new broad-spectrum influenza drugs in the near future.

Multicenter, randomized controlled, open label evaluation of the efficacy and safety of arbidol hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of influenza-like cases

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of arbidol hydrochloride tablets as a treatment for influenza-like diseases.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label study, a total of 412 influenza-like cases were collected from 14 hospitals in seven regions of Hebei Province from September 2021 to March 2022. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The control group (n = 207) were administered oseltamivir phosphate capsules for five days and the experimental group (n = 205) were administered arbidol hydrochloride tablets for five days. The primary endpoint was the time to normal body temperature, and the secondary endpoints included the time to remission of influenza symptoms, incidence of influenza-like complications, and incidence of adverse reactions.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there was no significant difference between the two groups in general conditions, blood routine, body temperature, or symptom severity. After treatment, there was no significant difference between the groups in the mean time to fever remission (59.24 h ± 25.21 vs. 61.05 h ± 29.47) or the mean time to remission of influenza symptoms (57.31 h ± 30.19 vs. 62.02 h ± 32.08). Survival analyses using Log-rank and Wilcoxon bilateral tests showed that there was no significant difference in fever relief time or influenza symptom relief time between the two groups. Regarding the incidence of complications and adverse events, there was only one case of tracheitis, one case of nausea, one case of vomiting, and one case of dizziness in the control group. In the experimental group, there was one case of nausea, one case of vomiting, and one case of drowsiness. In addition, one patient in the control group was hospitalized for urinary calculi.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between the patients with influenza-like cases treated with arbidol hydrochloride tablets and those treated with oseltamivir phosphate capsules. Further, the patients treated with arbidol hydrochloride tablets had fewer adverse reactions, and thus, the tablets were safe to use.

Arbidol: The current demand, strategies, and antiviral mechanisms

BACKGROUND

High morbidity and mortality of influenza virus infection have made it become one of the most lethal diseases threatening public health; the lack of drugs with strong antiviral activity against virus strains exacerbates the problem.

METHODS

Two independent researchers searched relevant studies using Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases from its inception to December 2022.

RESULTS

Based on the different antiviral mechanisms, current antiviral strategies can be mainly classified into virus-targeting approaches such as neuraminidase inhibitors, matrix protein 2 ion channel inhibitors, polymerase acidic protein inhibitors and other host-targeting antivirals. However, highly viral gene mutation has underscored the necessity of novel antiviral drug development. Arbidol (ARB) is a Russian-made indole-derivative small molecule licensed in Russia and China for the prevention and treatment of influenza and other respiratory viral infections. ARB also has inhibitory effects on many other viruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Coxsackie virus, respiratory syncytial virus, Hantaan virus, herpes simplex virus, and hepatitis B and C viruses. ARB is a promising drug which can not only exert activity against virus at different steps of virus replication cycle, but also directly target on hosts before infection to prevent virus invasion.

CONCLUSION

ARB is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that inhibits several viruses in vivo and in vitro, with high safety profile and low resistance; the antiviral mechanisms of ARB deserve to be further explored and more high-quality clinical studies are required to establish the efficacy and safety of ARB.

Clinical Characteristics and Mathematical Analysis of Curative Effect of Hemodialysis in Curing Poisoning Caused by Snakebite

In order to explore the clinical characteristics of hemodialysis in curing poisoning from snakebites, a two-classification model of nuclear logistic neural network based on restricted Boltzmann machine is proposed. The model combines kernel logistic regression with artificial neural networks, enabling the model to both learn autonomously and handle linearly inseparable problems. The network first performs feature learning through unsupervised training of restricted Boltzmann machines and obtains the initial values of the parameters to be identified, which reduces the influence of the randomness of the initial parameters. The variable universe learning rate with scaling factor is used to learn the parameters to be identified, and the model convergence speed is improved by dynamic adjustment of the learning rate. Experimental results show the following: Compared with before treatment, patient's activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) after treatment and the prothrombin time (PT) level decrease, fibrinogen (FIB) levels are elevated, aspartate transferase (AST) and creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) level decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). It is proved that continuous hemodiafiltration combined with plasma exchange treatment can effectively improve the blood coagulation index and myocardial index of severe snakebite poisoning patients.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a complex antiviral drug based on antibodies in the treatment of adult patients with acute respiratory viral infection

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Raphamin, containing technologically processed affinity-purified antibodies to interferon , CD4 receptor, 1 domain of the major histocompatibility complex class II and 2 microglobulin major histocompatibility complex class I in the treatment of acute respiratory viral infection (ARVI), including influenza, in adults. Materials and methods. 240 patients 1870 years old with ARVI were included in a phase III (20192020), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pregnant women, patients with suspected bacterial infections were excluded from the study. Raphamin/placebo was prescribed for 5 days within 24 hours of the illness onset. Primary endpoint was a time to resolution of ARVI (Polymerase chain reaction PCR-confirmed). Additionally, the severity of ARVI, proportion of patients with ARVI resolution/worsening/complications, frequency of antipyretics prescription, and time to resolution of symptoms of ARVI (including PCR non confirmed) were assessed. Results. The average time to resolution of ARVI (PCR-confirmed) was 4.11.9 [4.01.9] and 5.02.5 [5.02.5] days in the Raphamin/placebo groups (ITT and [PP] analysis, р=0.0155 and [р=0.0114], respectively). The duration of ARVI decreased by 0.892.23 [0.932.25] days. Superiority of Raphamin was shown during therapy period according to the ARVI resolution criterion (р=0.0014 [р=0.0005]). There were no statistically significant difference in the severity of ARVI and frequency of antipyretics prescription. The proportion of patients with worsening/complications was 0 [0]% and 2.5 [2.8]% in the Raphamin and placebo groups, respectively. Favorable safety profile of Raphamin (including the incidence and severity of adverse events) and high compliance were shown. Conclusion. Raphamin promotes significant decrease, practically by a day, the duration of ARVI, including influenza.

Interferon-α2b induced anemia in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a single centered, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The current outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread throughout the world. During treatment, we found that the majority of patients had a decrease in hemoglobin (Hb). Interferon-α2b (IFN-α2b) was the primary suspected drug that was related to Hb reduction. Thus, the study aimed to investigate whether IFN-α2b could induce Hb reduction in severe patients with COVID-19 and its potential mechanism.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 50 patients who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University with severe COVID-19 infection were enrolled from February 12^th to 24^th, 2020. The demographics, baseline characteristics, clinical data, and therapeutic regimen were collected retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the declined use of IFN-α2b on day 14. The Hb levels on admission, day 7, day14, and day 21 were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint was the level of Hb on day 21.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients in the IFN-stop group and 19 patients in the non-IFN-stop group were reviewed. The age, gender, comorbidities, clinical symptoms, nutritional status, disease severity, complications, and other factors of the patients were compared, no difference was found between the IFN-stop group and the non-IFN-stop group. The Hb levels of all patients significantly decreased on day 7 compared with that on admission (p < .0001). In the IFN-stop group, the Hb level was increased in 7 days after IFN-α2b was stopped (p = .0008), whereas no difference was found between day 14 and day 21 in the non-IFN-stop group (p = .3152).

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-α2b was associated with Hb reduction in the treatment of severe patients of COVID-19. Clinicians should be aware of the high incidence of Hb reduction for patients treated by IFN-α2b.

Current status and strategic possibilities on potential use of combinational drug therapy against COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2

The spread of new coronavirus infection starting December 2019 as novel SARS-CoV-2, identified as the causing agent of COVID-19, has affected all over the world and been declared as pandemic. Approximately, more than 8,807,398 confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection and 464,483 deaths have been reported globally till the end of 21 June 2020. Until now, there is no specific drug therapy or vaccine available for the treatment of COVID-19. However, some potential antimalarial drugs like hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, antifilarial drug ivermectin and antiviral drugs have been tested by many research groups worldwide for their possible effect against the COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been identified to act by creating the acidic condition in cells and inhibiting the importin (IMPα/β1) mediated viral import. There is a possibility that some other antimalarial drugs/antibiotics in combination with immunomodulators may help in combatting this pandemic disease. Therefore, this review focuses on the current use of various drugs as single agents (hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin, favipiravir, remdesivir, umifenovir, teicoplanin, nitazoxanide, doxycycline, and dexamethasone) or in combinations with immunomodulators additionally. Furthermore, possible mode of action, efficacy and current stage of clinical trials of various drug combinations against COVID-19 disease has also been discussed in detail.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Favipiravir Versus Arbidol for Clinical Recovery Rate in Moderate and Severe Adult COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: In addition to supportive therapy, antiviral therapy is an effective treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of favipiravir and umifenovir (Arbidol) to treat COVID-19 patients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label multicenter trial involving adult patients with COVID-19. Enrolled patients with initial symptoms within 12 days were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive conventional therapy plus Arbidol (200 mg*3/day) or favipiravir (1600 mg*2/first day followed by 600 mg*2/day) for 7 days. The primary outcome was the clinical recovery rate at day 7 of drug administration (relief for pyrexia and cough, respiratory frequency ≤24 times/min; oxygen saturation ≥98%). Latency to relief for pyrexia and cough and the rate of auxiliary oxygen therapy (AOT) or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NMV)/mechanical ventilation (MV) were the secondary outcomes. Safety data were collected for 17 days.

Results: A total of 240 enrolled COVID-19 patients underwent randomization; 120 patients were assigned to receive favipiravir (116 assessed), and 120 patients were assigned to receive Arbidol (120 assessed). The clinical recovery rate at day 7 of drug administration did not significantly differ between the favipiravir group (71/116) and Arbidol group (62/120) (p = 0.1396, difference in recovery rate: 0.0954; 95% CI: −0.0305∼0.2213). Favipiravir contributed to relief for both pyrexia (difference: 1.70 days, p < 0.0001) and cough (difference: 1.75 days, p < 0.0001). No difference was observed in the AOT or NMV/MV rate (both p > 0.05). The most frequently observed favipiravir-associated adverse event was increased serum uric acid (16/116, OR: 5.52, p = 0.0014).

Conclusion: Among patients with COVID-19, favipiravir, compared to Arbidol, did not significantly improve the clinical recovery rate at day 7. Favipiravir significantly improved the latency to relieve pyrexia and cough. Adverse effects caused by favipiravir are mild and manageable.

Efficacy and safety of arbidol (umifenovir) in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To provide the latest evidence for the efficacy and safety of arbidol (umifenovir) in COVID‐19 treatment.

Methods

A literature systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and medRxiv up to May 2021. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle–Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of included studies. Meta‐analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results

Sixteen studies were met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was observed between arbidol and non‐antiviral treatment groups neither for primary outcomes, including the negative rate of PCR (NR‐PCR) on Day 7 (risk ratio [RR]: 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–1.14) and Day 14 (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.96–1.25), and PCR negative conversion time (PCR‐NCT; mean difference [MD]: 0.74; 95% CI: −0.87 to 2.34), nor secondary outcomes (p > .05). However, arbidol was associated with higher adverse events (RR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.06–4.73). Compared with lopinavir/ritonavir, arbidol showed better efficacy for primary outcomes (p < .05). Adding arbidol to lopinavir/ritonavir also led to better efficacy in terms of NR‐PCR on Day 7 and PCR‐NCT (p < .05). There was no significant difference between arbidol and chloroquine in primary outcomes (p > .05). No remarkable therapeutic effect was observed between arbidol and other agents (p > .05).

Conclusion

The present meta‐analysis showed no significant benefit of using arbidol compared with non‐antiviral treatment or other therapeutic agents against COVID‐19 disease. High‐quality studies are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of arbidol for COVID‐19.

A review targeting the infection by CHIKV using computational and experimental approaches

The rise of normal body temperature of 98.6 °F beyond 100.4 °F in humans indicates fever due to some illness or infection. Viral infections caused by different viruses are one of the major causes of fever. One of such viruses is, Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is known to cause Chikungunya fever (CHIKF) which is transmitted to humans through the mosquitoes, which actually become the primary source of transmission of the virus. The genomic structure of the CHIKV consists of the two open reading frames (ORFs). The first one is a 5' end ORF and it encodes the nonstructural protein (nsP1-nsP4). The second is a 3' end ORF and it encodes the structural proteins, which is consisted of capsid, envelope (E), accessory peptides, E3 and 6 K. Till date, there is no effective vaccine or medicine available for early detection of the CHIKV infection and appropriate diagnosis to cure the patients from the infection. NSP3 of CHIKV is the prime target of the researchers as it is responsible for the catalytic activity. This review has updates of literature on CHIKV; pathogenesis of CHIKV; inhibition of CHIKV using theoretical and experimental approaches.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Data-driven molecular design for discovery and synthesis of novel ligands: a case study on SARS-CoV-2

Bridging systems biology and drug design, we propose a deep learning framework for de novo discovery of molecules tailored to bind with given protein targets. Our methodology is exemplified by the task of designing antiviral candidates to target SARS-CoV-2 related proteins. Crucially, our framework does not require fine-tuning for specific proteins but is demonstrated to generalize in proposing ligands with high predicted binding affinities against unseen targets. Coupling our framework with the automatic retrosynthesis prediction of IBM RXN for Chemistry, we demonstrate the feasibility of swift chemical synthesis of molecules with potential antiviral properties that were designed against a specific protein target. In particular, we synthesize an antiviral candidate designed against the host protein angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2); a surface receptor on human respiratory epithelial cells that facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry through its spike glycoprotein.

This is achieved as follows. First, we train a multimodal ligand–protein binding affinity model on predicting affinities of bioactive compounds to target proteins and couple this model with pharmacological toxicity predictors. Exploiting this multi-objective as a reward function of a conditional molecular generator that consists of two variational autoencoders (VAE), our framework steers the generation toward regions of the chemical space with high-reward molecules. Specifically, we explore a challenging setting of generating ligands against unseen protein targets by performing a leave-one-out-cross-validation on 41 SARS-CoV-2-related target proteins. Using deep reinforcement learning, it is demonstrated that in 35 out of 41 cases, the generation is biased towards sampling binding ligands, with an average increase of 83% comparing to an unbiased VAE. The generated molecules exhibit favorable properties in terms of target binding affinity, selectivity and drug-likeness. We use molecular retrosynthetic models to provide a synthetic accessibility assessment of the best generated hit molecules. Finally, with this end-to-end framework, we synthesize 3-Bromobenzylamine, a potential inhibitor of the host ACE2 protein, solely based on the recommendations of a molecular retrosynthesis model and a synthesis protocol prediction model. We hope that our framework can contribute towards swift discovery of de novo molecules with desired pharmacological properties.

COVID-19 severity in obese patients: Potential mechanisms and molecular targets for clinical intervention

With the global spread of SARS-CoV-2, millions of people have been affected leading to the declaration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a pandemic by the WHO. Several studies have linked the severity of COVID-19 cases and increased fatality in patients with obesity and other comorbid conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and kidney disease. Obesity, a metabolically deranged condition, establishes a low-grade chronic inflammation in the body, which affects different organs and promotes the development of several other diseases. The ways in which SARS-CoV-2 infection aggravates the already overloaded body organs with inflammation or vice versa has perplexed the researchers. As a result, there is an intensified search for the clear-cut mechanism to understand the link of obesity with the increased severity of COVID-19 in obese patients. In this article we have discussed various mechanisms linking obesity, inflammation, and COVID-19 to enhance the understanding of the disease process and help the clinicians and scientists develop potential cellular, molecular and metabolic targets for clinical intervention and management of COVID-19 severity in obese patients.

Comparison the Effect of Arbidol Plus Hydroxychloroquine vs Hydroxychloroquine Alone in Treatment of COVID-19 Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and Aim:

The main challenging issue about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the production of safe and stable vaccines, which is a very long process. Due to the emergency situation, regular and extensive screening of available and traditional drugs, which are commonly used for the treatment of similar viral diseases, can be a reasonable option. The present study aimed to compare the administration of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) plus arbidol to the use of HCQ alone in the treatment of COVID-19 infection.

Methods and Materials:

This single-blind randomized controlled trial was carried out on a total of 100 patients with COVID-19 referring to the infection ward of Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad, Iran, in 2020. The patients were randomly assigned to two HCQ alone and HCQ plus arbidol groups.

Results:

According to the obtained results, hematological parameters, including white blood cell count, hemoglobin level, lymphocyte count, and platelet count, improved in patients with COVID-19 after the treatment with both HCQ plus arbidol and HCQ alone (P<0.005). The mean values of the reduction time of C-reactive protein (CRP) were 4.48±1.24 and 8.22±2.08 days in the arbidol and HCQ alone groups, respectively, indicating that CRP decreased faster in the arbidol group than that reported for the HCQ alone group (Z=0.-7.85; P<0.000). The mean scores of hospital stay were reported as 5.89±2.04 and 9.35±3.72 days in the arbidol and HCQ alone groups, respectively (Z=-4.31; P<0.005). All the patients in the arbidol group survived, while 6% of the subjects in the HCQ alone group died. In addition, the drug regimen was not changed for any patient, and no subject was transferred to the intensive care unit in the arbidol group.

Conclusion:

In summary, the administration of both arbidol and HCQ leads to the improvement of the hematological parameters. The present study introduced arbidol as an effective treatment for moderate to severe patients with COVID-19, which not only reduced the time of CRP normalization level but also decreased the hospitalization duration and mortality compared to those reported for HCQ.

Promising inhibitors of nsp2 of CHIKV using molecular docking and temperature-dependent molecular dynamics simulations

Infection due to the Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has taken the life of lots of people; and researchers are working to find the vaccine or promisng drug candidates against this viral infection. In this work, the authors have designed one component reaction based on the thia-/oxa-azolidineone and created a library of 2000 molecules based on the product obtained. Further, the compounds were screened through the docking using iGemdock against the non-structural protein 2 (nsp2) of CHIKV. Molecular docking gives the binding energy (BE) or energy for the formation of the complex between the designed compound and nsp2 of CHIKV; and CMPD222 gave the lowest energy. This is based on the energy obtained from van der Waal's interaction, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic instructions. Further, molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) of nsp2 of CHIKV with and without screened compound (222) were performed to validate the docking results and the change in free energy for the formation of the complex is -10.8327 kcal/mol. To explore the potential of CMPD222, the MDS of the CMPD222-nsp2 of CHIKV were performed at different temperatures (325, 350, 375 and 400 K) to understand the inhibition of the protease. MM-GBSA calculations were performed to determined change in entropy, change in enthalpy and change in free energy to understand the inhibition. Maximum inhibition of nsp2 of CHIKV with CMPD222 is observed at 375 K with a change in free energy of -19.3754 kcal/mol.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

[Pharmacotherapy for acute respiratory infections caused by influenza viruses: current possibilities]

Routinely the influenza virus significantly contributes to the formation of the annual incidence of acute respiratory infections, with a peak in winter season. The high level of mutagenic potential of influenza viruses is a standard factor determining the complexity of the rational choice of pharmacotherapy. The upcoming epidemiological season 20202021 brings additional challenges for health care practitioners mediated by the widespread prevalence in the human population of a new infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus affecting the respiratory system among many organs and systems. An adequate choice of pharmacotherapy tools should be based on high efficiency and safety of drugs, with a possible reduction in such negative factors as polypharmacy. This review includes comparative pharmacological characteristics of drugs with activity against RNA viruses, along with parameters of their clinical efficacy.

Repurposing Approved Drugs for Guiding COVID-19 Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review

The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak originally appeared in China in December 2019 and became a global pandemic in March 2020. This infectious disease has directly affected public health and the world economy. Several palliative therapeutic treatments and prophylaxis strategies have been used to control the progress of this viral infection, including pre-(PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis. On the other hand, research groups around the world are still studying novel drug prophylaxis and treatment using repurposing approaches, as well as vaccination options, which are in different pre-clinical and clinical testing phases. This systematic review evaluated 1,228 articles from the PubMed and Scopus indexing databases, following the Kitchenham bibliographic searching protocol, with the aim to list drug candidates, potentially approved to be used as new options for SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis clinical trials and medical protocols. In searching protocol, we used the following keywords: "Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2" or "Coronavirus or 2019 nCoV," "prophylaxis," "prophylactic," "pre-exposure," "COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 Chemoprophylaxis," "repurposed," "strategies," "clinical," "trials," "anti-SARS-CoV-2," "anti-covid-19," "Antiviral," "Therapy prevention in vitro," in cells "and" human testing. After all protocol steps, we selected 60 articles that included: 15 studies with clinical data, 22 studies that used in vitro experiments, seven studies using animal models, and 18 studies performed with in silico experiments. Additionally, we included more 22 compounds between FDA approved drugs and drug-like like molecules, which were tested in large-scale screenings, as well as those repurposed approved drugs with new mechanism of actions. The drugs selected in this review can assist clinical studies and medical guidelines on the rational repurposing of known antiviral drugs for COVID-19 prophylaxis.

Semisynthetic Cardenolides Acting as Antiviral Inhibitors of Influenza A Virus Replication by Preventing Polymerase Complex Formation

Influenza virus infections represent a major public health issue by causing annual epidemics and occasional pandemics that affect thousands of people worldwide. Vaccination is the main prophylaxis to prevent these epidemics/pandemics, although the effectiveness of licensed vaccines is rather limited due to the constant mutations of influenza virus antigenic characteristics. The available anti-influenza drugs are still restricted and there is an increasing viral resistance to these compounds, thus highlighting the need for research and development of new antiviral drugs. In this work, two semisynthetic derivatives of digitoxigenin, namely C10 (3β-((N-(2-hydroxyethyl)aminoacetyl)amino-3-deoxydigitoxigenin) and C11 (3β-(hydroxyacetyl)amino-3-deoxydigitoxigenin), showed anti-influenza A virus activity by affecting the expression of viral proteins at the early and late stages of replication cycle, and altering the transcription and synthesis of new viral proteins, thereby inhibiting the formation of new virions. Such antiviral action occurred due to the interference in the assembly of viral polymerase, resulting in an impaired polymerase activity and, therefore, reducing viral replication. Confirming the in vitro results, a clinically relevant ex vivo model of influenza virus infection of human tumor-free lung tissues corroborated the potential of these compounds, especially C10, to completely abrogate influenza A virus replication at the highest concentration tested (2.0 µM). Taken together, these promising results demonstrated that C10 and C11 can be considered as potential new anti-influenza drug candidates.

The Impact of the COVID-19 "Infodemic" on Drug-Utilization Behaviors: Implications for Pharmacovigilance

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that hit the world in 2020 triggered a massive dissemination of information (an “infodemic”) about the disease that was channeled through the print, broadcast, web, and social media. This infodemic also included sensational and distorted information about drugs that likely first influenced opinion leaders and people particularly active on social media and then other people, thus affecting choices by individual patients everywhere. In particular, information has spread about some drugs approved for other indications (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, favipiravir, and umifenovir) that could have led to inappropriate and therefore hazardous use. In this article, we analyze the rationale behind the claims for use of these drugs in COVID-19, the communication about their effects on the disease, the consequences of this communication on people’s behavior, and the responses of some influential regulatory authorities in an attempt to minimize the actual or potential risks arising from this behavior. Finally, we discuss the role of pharmacovigilance stakeholders in emergency management and possible strategies to deal with other similar crises in the future.

[The use of viral RNA polymerase inhibitors in combination with a fusion inhibitor in the treatment of patients with COVID-19: hypothesis]

This review article considers the possibilities of combined antiviral therapy in the treatment of patients with COVID-19, based on the analysis of the mechanism of action of known antiviral drugs in the framework of the medical hypothesis. The potential effectiveness of the joint use of viral RNA polymerase inhibitors and a fusion inhibitor in this pathology is discussed. The review discusses the main representatives of these groups of drugs - ribavirin, riamilovir, umifenovir, favipiravir. The efficacy and safety profile of these drugs was analyzed, including the experience of their use in clinical trials conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as earlier work performed during the SARS and MERS epidemics.

Exploring Repurposing Potential of Existing Drugs in the Management of COVID-19 Epidemic: A Critical Review

Despite high morbidity and mortality of ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, no specific therapy has been established till date. Though in vitro studies identified various molecules as possible therapies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), these findings call for substantiation by human studies. We conducted this review aiming at reporting evidences on therapies used so far globally for management of COVID-19 in clinical settings. We searched electronic databases as PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE and extracted 612 possible studies as on May 31, 2020. We included original studies of any epidemiological design done on human COVID-19 patients and measured clinical outcomes. Finally, following removal of duplicates and studies meeting exclusion criteria, we derived 22 studies, of which eight were clinical trials, seven were case reports and case series, and seven were observational studies. The most reported therapies were hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (eight studies) and lopinavir/ritonavir (four studies). We conclude from the evidence generated so far that interferon combined with antivirals, remdesivir, umifenovir and favipiravir were mostly associated with better clinical outcomes. The therapeutic effect of HCQ was established initially by two clinical trials; one of them showing a reinforcing effect by azithromycin but subsequent studies did not elicit any effectiveness rather increased rate of adverse events was reported. Lopinavir/ritonavir was found beneficial when administered with interferon and ribavirin, but one clinical trial on its sole use proved contrary. As many clinical trials are in process, we expect to get concrete evidences on repurposing of existing drugs based on less biased, high powered studies.

Molecular Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Proteins and Their Interactions with Antiviral Drugs

A new Coronavirus strain, named SARS-CoV-2, suddenly emerged in early December 2019. SARS-CoV-2 resulted in being dramatically infectious, with thousands of people infected. In this scenario, and without effective vaccines available, the importance of an immediate tool to support patients and against viral diffusion becomes evident. In this study, we exploit the molecular docking approach to analyze the affinity between different viral proteins and several inhibitors, originally developed for other viral infections. Our data show that, in some cases, a relevant binding can be detected. These findings support the hypothesis to develop new antiviral agents against COVID-19, on the basis of already established therapies.

Antioxidant Potential of Antiviral Drug Umifenovir

Free radical reactions play an important role in biological functions of living systems. The balance between oxidants and antioxidants is necessary for the normal homeostasis of cells and organisms. Experimental works demonstrate the role of oxidative stress that is caused by influenza virus as well as the toxic effects of some antiviral drugs. Therefore, antiviral drugs should be characterized by its pro- and antioxidant activity, because it can affect its therapeutic efficiency. The aim of the study was to quantify the antioxidant capacity and propose the mechanism of the antioxidant effect of the antiviral drug Umifenovir (Arbidol®). The kinetic chemiluminescence with the 2,2'-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride + luminol system was used to quantify the antioxidant capacity of Umifenovir relative to the standard compound Trolox. With computer simulation, the reaction scheme and rate constants were proposed. The antioxidant capacity of 0.9 μM Umifenovir (maximum concentration of Umifenovir in blood after oral administration of 200 mg) was as high as 1.65 ± 0.18 μM of Trolox. Thus, the total antioxidant capacity of Umifenovir is comparable to the antioxidant capacity of Trolox. Unlike Trolox, Umifenovir reacts with free radicals in two stages. For Trolox, the free radical scavenging rate constant was k = 2000 nM-1 min.-1, for Umifenovir k1 = 300 nM-1min.-1, k2 = 4 nM-1min.-1. Slower kinetics of Umifenovir provides the prolonged antioxidant effect when compared to Trolox. This phenomenon can make a serious contribution to the compensation of oxidative stress that is caused by a viral disease and the therapeutic effect of the drug.

Are Community Acquired Respiratory Viral Infections an Underestimated Burden in Hematology Patients?

Despite a plethora of studies demonstrating significant morbidity and mortality due to community-acquired respiratory viral (CRV) infections in intensively treated hematology patients, and despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of respiratory viral infections in this setting, there is no uniform inclusion of respiratory viral infection management in the clinical hematology routine. Nevertheless, timely diagnosis and systematic management of CRV infections in intensively treated hematology patients has a demonstrated potential to significantly improve outcome. We have briefly summarized the recently published data on CRV infection epidemiology, as well as guidelines on the diagnosis and management of CRV infections in patients intensively treated for hematological malignancies. We have also assessed available treatment options, as well as mentioned novel agents currently in development.