Comparison of Response Evaluation in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic and Thoracic Neuroendocrine Tumors After Treatment with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]Octreotate

Molecular Imaging for Response Assessment of Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET)

Assessing treatment response in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) remains a significant challenge due to their typically indolent growth and heterogenity, the frequent occurrence of disease stabilization rather than tumor shrinkage after therapy, and the inherent limitations of conventional imaging criteria. While molecular imaging-primarily somatostatin receptor (SST) PET/CT-has improved lesion detection, the absence of standardized response criteria limits its clinical utility and prevents its use as full replacement of conventional imaging. Emerging strategies, including revised thresholds for dimensional changes, criteria evaluating different features, such as lesions' density and functional tumor volumes, offer potential improvements in response evaluation but require further validation for routine clinical implementation. This review examines the current challenges in assessing NET treatment response, evaluates the strengths and limitations of available imaging modalities, and discusses emerging approaches and future directions for optimizing therapeutic monitoring in the heterogeneous panorama of NET.

Relationship Between Best Tumor Shrinkage and Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients With Progressive Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE: Ad Hoc Analysis of the Phase III NETTER-1 Trial

BACKGROUND

In many solid tumors, early tumor shrinkage predicts the durability of treatment response. It is unclear whether this is the case for neuroendocrine tumors treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

METHODS

Data from the phase III NETTER-1 study of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (177Lu-DOTATATE) for the treatment of advanced, well-differentiated, midgut NETs were used to investigate whether objective tumor shrinkage (local review) with 177Lu-DOTATATE is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) duration.

RESULTS

Overall, 117 patients were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE (four cycles of 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks). In a landmark analysis, best tumor shrinkage from baseline until data cut-off (prior to first progression) was not associated with PFS (n = 102; hazard ratio: 1.002 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.02]; nominal p = 0.7808). In further ad hoc analyses, patients on the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm were dichotomized into ≥ 30% tumor shrinkage from baseline (18/117 [15.4%]) and < 30% shrinkage (99/117 [84.6%]). Median (95% CI) PFS was 17.6 (16.5-30.3) months in the ≥ 30% shrinkage group and 25.0 (19.4-31.0) months in the < 30% group. OS was not significantly different for the two tumor shrinkage groups (not estimable [31.0 months-not estimable] and 44.3 [34.9-53.8] months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the benefit of PRRT and the potential PFS and OS benefit of 177Lu-DOTATATE should not be based on tumor shrinkage (objective response versus stable disease) and that lack of tumor shrinkage should not impact application of the approved four cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE.

Diagnosis, Management and Theragnostic Approach of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) constitute an ideal target for radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. The theragnostic approach is able to combine diagnosis and therapy by the identification of a molecular target that can be diagnosed and treated with the same radiolabeled compound. During the last years, advances in functional imaging with the introduction of somatostatin analogs and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, have improved the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs. Moreover, PET/CT imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG represents a complementary tool for prognostic evaluation of patients with GEP-NENs. In the field of personalized medicine, the theragnostic approach has emerged as a promising tool in diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs, focusing on the theragnostic approach.

Bronchial Carcinoids: From Molecular Background to Treatment Approach

A better understanding of the genetic and molecular background of bronchial carcinoids (BCs) would allow a better estimation of the risk of disease progression and the personalization of treatment in cases of advanced disease. Molecular studies confirmed that lungs neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are different entities; thus, no progression of NET to NEC is expected. In BCs, MEN1 gene mutations and deletions and decreased gene expression have been associated with a poor prognosis. ATRX mutation has also been linked to a shorter disease-specific survival. In terms of therapeutic targets, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway mutations have been described in 13% of typical carcinoids (TCs) and 39% of atypical carcinoids (ACs), representing a targetable mutation with kinase inhibitors. Regarding treatment, surgical resection is usually curative in localized BCs and adjuvant treatment is not routinely recommended. Multiple options for systemic therapy exist for patients with advanced BCs, although limited by a heterogeneity in the scientific evidence behind their use recommendation. These options include somatostatin analogues, everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, and immunotherapy. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review about the molecular and genetic background of BCs, and about the treatment of local and metastatic disease, as well as the main paraneoplastic syndromes that have been associated with this tumor.

The association between lesion tracer uptake on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET with morphological response to 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

To determine in a group of patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (PM-NETs) treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE whether a correlation exists between somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-2 expression in various tumors on baseline 68Ga-DOTATATE PET and their response to therapy. A secondary aim was to determine whether an association exists between tumor product of diameter (POD) and PET-derived Krenning score.

MATERIALS METHODS

Patients treated PM-NETs who had SSTR-2 overexpression (SSTR-RADS 5) on screening 68Ga-DOTATATE PET and CT at baseline and 3 months after therapy completion were included. Marker lesions on baseline CT were reassessed on CT after therapy using adapted Southwest Oncology Group solid tumor evaluation criteria. For each lesion, bidimensional diameter on CT and SSTR expression on PET (SSTR-RADS uptake score & PET-derived Krenning score) were recorded. Logistic regression models fitted through generalized estimating equations were used to assess for an association between SSTR expression and response to therapy, or lesion's POD.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with SSTR-RADS 5 PM-NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE were included. There were 135 marker lesions (mean 3.2 lesions/patient) with Krenning score of 4 (n = 74), 3 (n = 44) or 2 (n = 17). There was no association found between SSTR-2 expression, as determined by SSTR-RADS uptake score or PET-derived Krenning score, and POD or response to therapy.

CONCLUSION

In patients with SSTR-RADS 5 PM-NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE, there was similar response to therapy for all lesions with PET-generated Krenning score ≥2. No correlation was found between lesion's POD and level of tracer uptake.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies

Simple Summary

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies.

Abstract

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.

The Autophagy Inhibitor Chloroquine, Alone or in Combination with mTOR Inhibitors, Displays Anti-Tumor Effects in In Vitro and In Vivo Lung Carcinoid Models

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung (lung carcinoids) are often diagnosed when they are not surgically curable, and treatment options are limited. One of the approved options for treating inoperable tumors is everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor. Activation of mTOR inhibits autophagy, which is a cell survival mechanism; everolimus may paradoxically encourage cancer cell survival via stimulation of autophagy. Chloroquine, a known antimalarial compound, inhibits autophagy. Our research is focused on the hypothesis that autophagy plays a key role in the development of tumor resistance to everolimus, and that chloroquine addition to an mTOR inhibitor increases their inhibitory effect on tumor growth. In this study, we examined the effects of chloroquine alone or in combination with mTOR inhibitors on lung neuroendocrine tumor models (cell lines and mice). We have shown that chloroquine alone suppresses tumor cells’ viability and proliferation and increases their cytotoxicity and apoptosis; these effects are augmented when chloroquine is added to mTOR inhibitors. Apparently, chloroquine suppresses tumor cell growth in lung neuroendocrine neoplasms models, potentiating the effects of the mTOR inhibitors, and implying that more research is warranted to unravel its possible role in the clinical setting, in patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Abstract

(1) Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung (LNENs, lung carcinoids) are often diagnosed at an advanced stage when they are not surgically curable, and treatment options are limited. One of the approved options for treating inoperable tumors is everolimus—an mTOR inhibitor (mTORi). Activation of mTOR, among many other effects, inhibits autophagy, which is a cell survival mechanism in general, and in tumor cells in particular. Everolimus may paradoxically encourage cancer cell survival. In practice, the drug inhibits tumor development. Chloroquine (CQ) is a known antimalarial compound that inhibits autophagy. Our research is focused on the hypothesis that autophagy plays a key role in the development of tumor resistance to mTORi, and that the addition of autophagy inhibitors to mTORi exerts a synergistic effect on suppressing tumor cell proliferation. We have recently demonstrated that the combination of CQ with different mTORi increases their potency compared with mTORi alone in both in vitro and in vivo models of pancreatic NENs. In this study, we examined the effects of CQ and mTORi on in vitro and in vivo LNEN models. Aims: Testing the effects of CQ together with mTORi on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy in in vitro and in vivo LNEN models. (2) Methods: The NCI-H727 LNEN cells were treated with CQ ± mTORi. Cells’ viability and proliferation were measured using XTT and Ki-67 FACS staining. The effects of the treatments on the mTOR pathway and autophagy were examined using Western blotting. Cytotoxicity was measured using a cytotoxicity kit; apoptosis was measured by PI FACS staining and Western blotting. We further established an LNEN subcutaneous murine xenograft model and evaluated the effects of the drugs on tumor growth. (3) Results: CQ alone suppressed LNEN cells’ viability and proliferation and increased their cytotoxicity and apoptosis; these effects were augmented when CQ was added to an mTORi. We also showed the possible mechanisms for these results: on the one hand we could see a decrease in P62 levels and the absence of LC3-II (both inversely related to autophagy) following treatment with the mTORi, and on the other hand we could demonstrate an increase in their levels when CQ was added. The effect was less apparent in the murine xenograft model. (4) Conclusions: By inhibiting autophagy and inducing apoptosis, CQ suppresses tumor cell growth in LNENs. CQ potentiates mTORi effects, implying that further studies are needed in order to elucidate its possible role in tumor inhibition in patients with LNENs.

Gallium-68-somatostatin receptor PET/CT parameters as potential prognosticators for clinical time to progression after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: a cohort study

Background

Early [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT imaging after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine neoplasm patients is often used as a prognosticator for survival, but lacks validity. This study investigates the prognostic value of changes in PET parameters after PRRT.

Methods

Baseline and follow-up [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT scans of all patients treated with PRRT were delineated automatically. Total lesion somatostatin receptor expression (TL-SSTR) and somatostatin receptor expressing tumor volume (SSTR-TV) were used as covariates in Cox proportional hazard models to predict time-to-new treatment.

Results

In twenty patients, median time-to-new treatment was 19.3 months (range [3.8; 36.2]). Absolute and percentual changes in both PET parameters were not associated with time-to-new treatment. A significant relation between independent baseline and follow-up SSTR-TV and follow-up TL-SSTR, and time-to-new treatment was identified.

Conclusions

Automatically derived [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT parameters are easy to acquire and may be of prognostic value after completing PRRT. Acquiring SSTR-TV or TL-SSTR parameters at baseline and during follow-up can be of value in identifying a patient’s prognosis.

Somatostatin and Somatostatin Receptors: From Signaling to Clinical Applications in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms which arise from neuroendocrine cells that are distributed widely throughout the body. Although heterogenous, many of them share their ability to overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on their cell surface. Due to this, SSTR and somatostatin have been a large subject of interest in the discovery of potential biomarkers and treatment options for the disease. The aim of this review is to describe the molecular characteristics of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors and its application in diagnosis and therapy on patients with NENs as well as the use in the near future of somatostatin antagonists.

90Y/177Lu-DOTATOC: From Preclinical Studies to Application in Humans

The PRRT (Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy) is a promising modality treatment for patients with inoperable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients are favorably comparable with standard therapies. The protagonist in this type of therapy is a somatostatin-modified peptide fragment ([Tyr3] octreotide), equipped with a specific chelating system (DOTA) capable of creating a stable bond with β-emitting radionuclides, such as yttrium-90 and lutetium-177. In this review, covering twenty five years of literature, we describe the characteristics and performances of the two most used therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals for the NETs radio-treatment: [90Y]Y-DOTATOC and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC taking this opportunity to retrace the most significant results that have determined their success, promoting them from preclinical studies to application in humans.

Theranostics in Nuclear Medicine: Emerging and Re-emerging Integrated Imaging and Therapies in the Era of Precision Oncology

Theranostics refers to the pairing of diagnostic biomarkers with therapeutic agents that share a specific target in diseased cells or tissues. Nuclear medicine, particularly with regard to applications in oncology, is currently one of the greatest components of the theranostic concept in clinical and research scenarios. Theranostics in nuclear medicine, or nuclear theranostics, refers to the use of radioactive compounds to image biologic phenomena by means of expression of specific disease targets such as cell surface receptors or membrane transporters, and then to use specifically designed agents to deliver ionizing radiation to the tissues that express these targets. The nuclear theranostic approach has sparked increasing interest and gained importance in parallel to the growth in molecular imaging and personalized medicine, helping to provide customized management for various diseases; improving patient selection, prediction of response and toxicity, and determination of prognosis; and avoiding futile and costly diagnostic examinations and treatment of many diseases. The authors provide an overview of theranostic approaches in nuclear medicine, starting with a review of the main concepts and unique features of nuclear theranostics and aided by a retrospective discussion of the progress of theranostic agents since early applications, with illustrative cases emphasizing the imaging features. Advanced concepts regarding the role of fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in theranostics, as well as developments in and future directions of theranostics, are discussed. ^©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Greenspan and Jadvar.

The Challenge of Evaluating Response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Present and the Future

The NETTER-1 study has proven peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to be one of the most effective therapeutic options for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), improving progression-free survival and overall survival. However, PRRT response assessment is challenging and no consensus on methods and timing has yet been reached among experts in the field. This issue is owed to the suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of clinical biomarkers, limitations of morphological response criteria in slowly growing tumors and necrotic changes after therapy, a lack of standardized parameters and timing of functional imaging and the heterogeneity of PRRT protocols in the literature. The aim of this article is to review the most relevant current approaches for PRRT efficacy prediction and response assessment criteria in order to provide an overview of suitable tools for safe and efficacious PRRT.

Safety and outcomes of 177 Lu-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumours: experience in New South Wales, Australia

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is a promising treatment for inoperable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET). In 2015, the NSW Ministry of Health provided funding for ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE treatment of NET under an evaluation framework.

AIMS

To examine the safety and outcomes of NET patients treated with ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE under the evaluation framework and assess the statewide implementation of the NSW Lutate therapy referral and protocol for neuroendocrine cancer patients.

METHODS

A quality of care clinical audit was conducted on all NET patients treated with ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE from October 2010 to October 2015 at St George Hospital, and from August 2013 to March 2017 at Royal North Shore Hospital. Percentage of patients who met protocol selection criteria was calculated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted regression analyses assessed associations between key clinical factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 279 patients was treated. Statewide protocol implementation led to an increase from 60.5 to 83.8% in patients meeting selection criteria. Estimated median overall survival was significantly longer for patients who met selection criteria compared with those who did not (50.7 vs 34.2 months) (P = 0.018). This was driven by the significantly worse overall survival in patients who failed exclusion criteria (P < 0.001). ¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE was well tolerated with haematological, renal and hepatic treatment-related serious adverse events experienced by 9.7, 0.4 and 0.4% of patients respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁷⁷ Lu-DOTATATE is a promising treatment for advanced NET. Superior survival in patients who met selection criteria emphasise the importance of protocol adherence.

The efficacy of 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) radionuclide therapy in patients with inoperable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), (PROSPERO ID CRD42019130755).

METHODS

All published clinical studies of NETs treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE were identified based on systematic searches in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to January 2019. Among these studies, only the reports evaluated with the "Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)" or "Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)" criteria or both were included. We analysed the disease response rate (DRR) and disease control rate (DCR) of each group to evaluate the efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were selected from 715 references. The pooled effect in the RECIST group (13 studies) was 27.58% (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.03-35.27%) for the DRR and 79.14% (95% CI 75.83-82.1%) for the DCR. In the SWOG criteria group (7 studies), the pooled effect was 20.59% (95% CI 10.89-35.51%) for the DRR and 78.28% (95% CI 74.39-81.72%) for the DCR. Therefore, the RECIST and SWOG groups showed similar DRRs and DCRs after¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatment, indicating that ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatment has excellent efficacy with a control rate of approximately 78-79%. Moreover, adverse effects of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE were minimal, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting and hormonal disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with inoperable or metastatic NETs, ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE is an effective treatment with minimal side effects.

The therapeutic efficacy of 177Lu-DOTATATE/DOTATOC in advanced neuroendocrine tumors: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analog therapies showed great potential for patients suffering advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study was aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Lu-DOTATATE/DOTATOC (Lu-octreotate/octreotide) peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in advanced or inoperable NETs patients.

METHODS

Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from 1950 to April 2019. Eligible studies should include randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs)-based investigations of Lu-octreotate/octreotide PRRT for NETs. All these studies were assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), RECIST 1.1, Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Disease response rates (DRRs) and disease control rates (DCRs) were calculated according to each response criteria group. DRRs were defined as the percentages of patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), while DCRs represented the percentages of patients with CR+ PR+ stable disease (SD). The pooled proportions were calculated with either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model depending on the test for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies (1758 patients) were included in this meta-analysis: 8 studies with 478 patients met RECIST criteria, 10 studies with 1127 patients met RECIST 1.1 criteria, 5 studies with 459 patients met SWOG criteria, and 1 study with 40 patients met WHO criteria, and among these articles 1 study met both RECIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria and 1 met both RECIST 1.1 and SWOG criteria. The pooled DRRs were 33.0% (95% CI: 25.0%-42.0%, I = 65%), 35.0% (95% CI: 26.0%-45.0%, I = 91%) and 25.0% (95% CI: 14.0%-36.0%, I = 84%) according to RECIST, RECIST 1.1 and SWOG criteria, respectively. The pooled DCRs were 79.0% (95% CI: 75.0%-83.0%, I = 97%), 83.0% (95% CI: 78.0%-88.0%, I = 0) and 82.0% (95% CI: 75.0%-89.0%, I = 91%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In advanced NETs patients, DRRs and DCRs were significantly elevated after initial treatment with Lu-DOTATATE PRRT, which shows that this treatment would be beneficial and promising for advanced or inoperable NETs patients.

Efficacy of 177Lu Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of Lu-labeled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) induction treatments for patients with unresectable metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid were systematically searched with keywords "lutetium," "Lu-177," "PRRT," "neuroendocrine," and "prognosis." Studies evaluating treatment with Lu-labeled PRRT were assessed for disease response and/or disease control rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 or 1.1, modified RECIST, Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), or modified SWOG criteria. Pooled proportions of disease response and control rates were calculated for both fixed- and random-effects models.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with 1920 patients were included (11 with 1268 patients using RECIST and 6 with 804 patients using SWOG). By RECIST criteria, the pooled disease response rate by random-effects model was 29.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.2%-38.9%), and disease control rate was 74.1% (95% CI, 67.8%-80.0%). By SWOG criteria, the pooled disease response rate by random-effects model was 30.6% (95% CI, 20.7%-41.5%), and disease control rate was 81.1% (95% CI, 76.4%-85.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy, typically 4 treatments, with Lu PRRT is an effective method of treating unresectable metastatic neuroendocrine tumors with significant disease response and control rates.

Everolimus, lutetium-177 DOTATATE and sunitinib for advanced, unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours with disease progression: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a group of heterogeneous cancers that develop in cells in the diffuse neuroendocrine system.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the clinical effectiveness of three interventions [everolimus (Afinitor^®; Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland), lutetium-177 DOTATATE (177Lu-DOTATATE) (Lutathera^®; Imaging Equipment Ltd, Radstock, UK) and sunitinib (Sutent^®; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA)] for treating unresectable or metastatic NETs with disease progression and establish the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched from inception to May 2016: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily, Epub Ahead of Print, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

We systematically reviewed the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness literature on everolimus, 177Lu-DOTATATE and sunitinib for treating advanced, unresectable or metastatic progressive NETs. The following NET locations were considered separately: pancreas, gastrointestinal (GI) tract and lung, and GI tract (midgut only). We wrote a survival partition cohort-based economic evaluation in Microsoft Excel^® 2013 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) from the UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. This comprised three health states: (1) progression-free survival (PFS), (2) progressed disease and (3) death.

RESULTS

Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RADIANT-3 [RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial; pancreatic NETs (pNETs): everolimus vs. best supportive care (BSC)], A6181111 (pNETs: sunitinib vs. BSC) and RADIANT-4 (RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fourth Trial; GI and lung NETs: everolimus vs. BSC), met the inclusion criteria for the clinical effectiveness systematic review. The risk of bias was low. Although the NETTER-1 (Neuroendocrine Tumors Therapy) RCT, of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus 30 mg of octreotide (Sandostatin^®, Novartis) compared with 60 mg of octreotide, was excluded from the review, we nonetheless present the results of this trial, as it informs our estimate of the cost-effectiveness of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The pNETs trials consistently found that the interventions improved PFS and overall survival (OS) compared with BSC. Our indirect comparison found no significant difference in PFS between everolimus and sunitinib. Estimates of OS gain were confounded because of high rates of treatment switching. After adjustment, our indirect comparison suggested a lower, but non-significant, hazard of death for sunitinib compared with everolimus. In GI and lung NETs, everolimus significantly improved PFS compared with BSC and showed a non-significant trend towards improved OS compared with BSC. Adverse events were more commonly reported following treatment with targeted interventions than after treatment with BSC. In the base case for pNETs, assuming list prices, we estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for everolimus compared with BSC of £45,493 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and for sunitinib compared with BSC of £20,717 per QALY. These ICERs increased substantially without the adjustment for treatment switching. For GI and lung NETs, we estimated an ICER for everolimus compared with BSC of £44,557 per QALY. For GI (midgut) NETs, the ICERs were £199,233 per QALY for everolimus compared with BSC and £62,158 per QALY for a scenario analysis comparing 177Lu-DOTATATE with BSC. We judge that no treatment meets the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) end-of-life criteria, although we cannot rule out that sunitinib in the A6181111 trial does.

LIMITATIONS

A RCT with included comparators was not identified for 177Lu-DOTATATE. The indirect treatment comparison that our economic analysis was based on was of a simple Bucher type, unadjusted for any differences in the baseline characteristics across the two trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Given NICE's current stated range of £20,000-30,000 per QALY for the cost-effectiveness threshold, based on list prices, only sunitinib might be considered good value for money in England and Wales.

FUTURE WORK

Further analysis of individual patient data from RADIANT-3 would allow assessment of the robustness of our findings. The data were not made available to us by the company sponsoring the trial.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016041303.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Unmet Medical Needs in Pulmonary Neuroendocrine (Carcinoid) Neoplasms

Pulmonary carcinoids (PCs) display the common features of all well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and are classified as low- and intermediate-grade malignant tumours (i.e., typical and atypical carcinoid, respectively). There is a paucity of randomised studies dedicated to advanced PCs and management principles are drawn from the larger gastroenteropancreatic NEN experience. There is growing evidence that NEN anatomic subgroups have different biology and different responses to treatment and, therefore, should be investigated as separate entities in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the existing evidence and limitations of tumour classification, diagnostics and staging, prognostication, and treatment in the setting of PC, with focus on unmet medical needs and directions for the future.

Personalized 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours: initial results from the P-PRRT trial

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is mostly administered using a fixed injected activity (IA) per cycle. This empiric regime results in highly variable absorbed doses to the critical organs and undertreatment of the majority of patients. We conceived a personalized PRRT protocol in which the IA is adjusted to deliver a prescribed absorbed dose to the kidney, with the aim to safely increase tumour irradiation. We herein report on the initial results of our prospective study of personalized PRRT, the P-PRRT Trial (NCT02754297).

METHODS

PRRT-naïve patients with progressive and/or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) were scheduled to receive a four-cycle induction course of ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate with quantitative SPECT/CT-based dosimetry. The IA was personalized according to the glomerular filtration rate and the body surface area for the first cycle, and according to the prior renal Gy/GBq for the subsequent cycles. The prescribed renal absorbed dose of 23 Gy was reduced by 25-50% in case of significant renal or haematological impairment. Responders were allowed to receive consolidation or maintenance cycles, for each of which 6 Gy to the kidney were prescribed. We simulated the empiric PRRT regime by fixing the IA at 7.4 GBq per cycle, with the same percentage reductions as above. Radiological, molecular imaging, biochemical, and quality of life responses, as well as safety, were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent 171 cycles. In 34 patients who completed the induction course, a median cumulative IA of 36.1 (range, 6.3-78.6) GBq was administered, and the median cumulative kidney and maximum tumour absorbed doses were 22.1 (range, 8.3-24.3) Gy and 185.7 (range: 15.2-443.1) Gy respectively. Compared with the simulated fixed-IA induction regime, there was a median 1.26-fold increase (range, 0.47-2.12 fold) in the cumulative maximum tumour absorbed dose, which was higher in 85.3% of patients. In 39 assessable patients, the best objective response was partial response in nine (23.1%), minor response in 14 (35.9%), stable disease in 13 (33.3%) and progressive disease in three patients (7.7%). In particular, 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) with pancreatic NET had partial or minor response. The global health status/quality of life score significantly increased in 50% of patients. Acute and subacute side-effects were all of grade 1 or 2, and the most common were nausea (in 32.7% of patients) and fatigue (in 30.8% of patients) respectively. Subacute grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in less than 10% of patients, with the exception of lymphocytopenia in 51.9% of patients, without any clinical consequences however. No patient experienced severe renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized PRRT makes it possible to safely increase tumour irradiation in the majority of patients. Our first results indicate a favourable tolerance profile, which appears similar to that of the empiric regime. The response rates are promising, in particular in patients with NET of pancreatic origin.

The RECIST criteria compared to conventional response evaluation after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) is the most used radiological method for evaluating response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. This method may give too positive estimates of response in slow growing tumors as it allows a substantial increase in tumor size before patients are classified as having progressive disease. We wanted to compare RECIST with a conventional method in routine use for estimating treatment effect based on defining any unequivocal increase in size of tumor load as progressive disease. We also wanted to investigate whether any differences had clinical implications.

METHODS

Patients treated with ¹⁷⁷Lutetium-DOTA-octreotate having at least one follow-up radiological response evaluation were included. Radiological examinations were retrospectively evaluated by RECIST and compared to the radiological evaluations performed at regular follow-up examinations.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included, 33 (42%) were women, median age 65 years. The primary tumors was located in the small intestine in 35 (44%) and the in the pancreas in 27 (34%) of the patients. Indication for treatment was progressive disease in 71 (90%) patients. Based on RECIST, 67 (85%) patients had objective response or stable disease as best effect versus 59 (75%) patients based on the conventional method (p < 0.001). Median progression free survival was 33 months estimated by RECIST and 28 months estimated with the conventional method (p < 0.001). Eight (10%) patients received tumor-targeted therapy due to progressive disease based on the conventional method while still having stable disease according to RECIST.

CONCLUSION

Response evaluation after PRRT with RECIST gave more positive estimates for treatment effects compared to a method where any equivocal change in tumor load was regarded as significant. These differences had clinical implications.

177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours including high-grade (WHO G3) neuroendocrine tumours: response to treatment and long-term survival update

PURPOSE

Upon diagnosis, distant metastases are encountered in 21-50% of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). However, few systemic treatment options are available for the well-differentiated NETs in the metastatic stage. Lu-DOTATATE is one of the most effective treatments in this limited patient group. We retrospectively investigated its efficacy and effect on the survival in patients with both well-differentiated and grade III NETs who had high uptake in pretherapeutic Ga-DOTATATE PET/computed tomography scans.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic NETs treated with Lu-DOTATATE between January 2010 and November 2015 in our department were included in this retrospective cohort. Toxicity and adverse effects were evaluated according to SWOG criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated considering the first date of treatment. Response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria. Potential predictors of survival and response were analysed.

RESULTS

Patients (n=186) with metastatic NETs originating from various primary sites (bronchial, pancreatic, nonpancreatic gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma and unknown primary) were treated with 1107 courses of Lu-DOTATATE treatment (median: 6; range: 3-12). Among 160 patients whose responses to treatment could be evaluated according to the RECIST criteria, 28.1% (n=45) had a progressive disease, 21.9% (n=35) had a stable disease, 46.9% (n=75) had a partial response and 3.1% (n=5) had a complete response. Median follow-up was 30.6 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimated median PFS was 36.4 months, mean PFS was 38 months and the mean OS was 55 months. The disease control rates in patients with WHO grades I, II and III were 74, 73 and 60%, respectively, and the OS rates were 61.9, 52.2 and 38.4 months, respectively. We observed no major renal toxicity except a minor increase (11.1%) in average serum creatinine levels. In 33.9% (n=56) of the patients, grade I toxicity; in 9.1% (n=15), grade II; and in 1.2% (n=2), grade III toxicity were observed.

CONCLUSION

Lu-DOTATATE therapy is an important treatment option in somatostatin receptor type-2-positive pancreatic, nonpancreatic gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, and lung NETs including metastatic NETs with an unknown primary site and significantly contributed to patients' OS. Additionally, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may have a role in a selected subgroup of patients with grade III NET with high somatostatin receptor type-2 expression.

Concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE and Capecitabine Therapy in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Long-term-Outcome, Toxicity, Survival, and Quality-of-Life Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome, toxicity, survival, and quality of life in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent baseline Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scans. Lu-DOTATATE therapy was administered quarterly along with oral capecitabine therapy in group 1 patients (n = 88), whereas group 2 patients (n = 79) were treated only with Lu-DOTATATE. Hematologic, kidney function, liver function tests and chromogranin A levels were recorded before and after therapy at 2-week, 4-week, and 3-month intervals. Biochemical and morphological responses were assessed with the trend in chromogranin A levels and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the hemoglobin levels after Lu-DOTATATE therapy (P = 0.4892). In most patients, there was a decrease in the platelet levels; however, all the patients had platelet counts greater than 100,000/μL with no platelet toxicity. There was no toxicity related to leukocytes. Two patients showed renal insufficiencies. No hepatotoxicity was observed in any of the patients. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, in group 1 patients, the response was partial response in 34% of the patients, stable disease in 50.2%, and progressive disease in 6.8% versus partial response in 6.3%, stable disease in 60.9%, and progressive disease in 26.5% among group 2 patients. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in group 1 patients. The median OS and PFS in group 2 patients were 48 months. Ki-67 tumor proliferation index was significantly associated with increased risk of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of capecitabine therapy with Lu-DOTATATE therapy lengthens the OS and PFS. Patients with aggressive disease may benefit from this synergetic therapeutic approach.

Early efficacy of and toxicity from lutetium-177-DOTATATE treatment in patients with progressive metastatic NET

OBJECTIVE

Lutetium-177 DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide (Lu-DOTATATE) is a treatment option for patients with well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. Our centre started administering this therapy in 2012. The aim of this study was therefore to analyse the first cohort of patients treated with Lu-DOTATATE to determine its early efficacy and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patient, tumour and treatment characteristics, end-of-treatment outcome, time to progression and toxicity in 79 consecutive patients treated with Lu-DOTATATE who had progressive NET according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria. Follow-up time was 12-40 months. Study of Kaplan-Meier plots, analysis of time to progression and multiple regression analysis of factors predictive of time to progression were performed.

RESULTS

At end-of-treatment radiological restaging, 13% of patients were found to have partial response and 64% to have stable disease; 23% of patients progressed through treatment. Overall, 47% of patients demonstrated a reduction in chromogranin A levels. The overall estimated median time to progression from the start of treatment was 28 months for the entire cohort and 31, 30 and 5 months for those with partial response, stable disease and progressive disease, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, higher grade of tumour was found to be significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival. Three patients experienced grade 1 haematotoxicity, five grade 1 nephrotoxicity and one grade 2 nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Early outcomes of patients treated with Lu-DOTATATE are similar to those in previously published series in terms of end-of-treatment efficacy and toxicity. This provides further evidence that this is a safe and efficacious form of treatment for patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy With 177Lu-Octreotate in Patients With Somatostatin Receptor Expressing Neuroendocrine Tumors: Six Years' Assessment

OBJECTIVES

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues is a promising treatment for patients with inoperable, well to moderately differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In continuation of our novel study with the radionuclide lutetium Lu, we now present further results of Lu DOTATATE therapy in managing NETs and other somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors in a larger and more diverse patient group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-four consecutive patients (85 men and 59 women; age range, 11-87 years; mean age, 58.5 years) with histologically confirmed NET were enrolled. One hundred forty-three patients received at least 1 cycle of treatment. Among them, 132 were deemed evaluable by having at least 1 cycle of treatment and a posttreatment MRI or CT scan for assessment based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Response to therapy was evaluated in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, as well as radiologic, biochemical, and clinical responses. Further, analysis of symptoms was reviewed during therapy and also in subsequent follow-ups for safety evaluation. Renal, gastrointestinal (GI), hepatic, and hematological adverse events were evaluated using National Cancer Institute common toxicities criteria V4.03, through full blood panels, as well as consultation with patients for any symptoms and/or adverse events.

RESULTS

As of July 2016, median progression-free survival was about to be reached. Of 28 patients who have completed Lu DOTATATE therapy (completion of 4 or more cycles of treatment and all designated follow-ups), no patient showed complete response (CR), 8 patients (28.57%) showed partial response (PR), 16 patients (57.14%) showed stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) was observed in 4 patients (14.28%). The objective response rate (CR + PR) of this group was 28.57% (n = 8) with a cumulative disease control (CR + PR + SD) of 85.71% (n = 24).Among 132 evaluable patients, assessment of treatment response using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria revealed CR in none of the patients, PR in 12 patients (9.09%), SD in 66 patients (50%), whereas PD, which included patients who passed away, was observed in 54 patients (40.90%), yielding an objective response rate of 9.09% (n = 12) and a cumulative disease control rate of 59.09% (n = 78).Symptoms including abdominal pain, diarrhea, flushing, and fatigue improved in over 50% of the patients, whereas weight loss improved in 28.26% of the patients. No grade 3 or grade 4 renal toxicities were found, though eleven grade 3 and five grade 4 hematological as well as three grade 3 hepatotoxicities were reported. Grade 3 hematotoxicity lasted an average of 2.7 months, and grade 4 lasted for only 0.9 months, whereas grade 3 hepatotoxicity lasted an average of 3.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has shown promising potential as a safe and effective targeted therapy in inoperable, well to moderately differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine cancers. The results of the multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in United States and Europe are concordant with current study.

Clinical History of the Theranostic Radionuclide Approach to Neuroendocrine Tumors and Other Types of Cancer: Historical Review Based on an Interview of Eric P. Krenning by Rachel Levine

In nuclear medicine, the term theranostics describes the combination of therapy and diagnostic imaging. In practice, this concept dates back more than 50 years; however, among the most successful examples of theranostics are peptide receptor scintigraphy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. The development of these modalities through the radiolabeling of somatostatin analogs with various radionuclides has led to a revolution in patient management and established a foundation for expansion of the theranostic principle into other oncology indications. This article provides a review of the evolution and development of the theranostic radionuclide approach to the management of neuroendocrine tumors, as described by the inventor of this technique, Eric P. Krenning, in an interview with Rachel Levine.

Pitfalls in the response evaluation after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) is a treatment with good results in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEPNETs). However, there are some pitfalls that should be taken into consideration when evaluating the treatment response after PRRT. 354 Dutch patients with GEPNETs who were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE between March 2000 and December 2011 were retrospectively selected. Liver function parameters and chromogranin A were measured before each therapy and in follow-up. Anatomical imaging was performed before therapy and in follow-up. An increase in aminotransferases by ≥20% compared to baseline was observed in 83 of 351 patients (24%). In patients with an objective response (OR) and stable disease (SD) this increase was observed in 71/297 (24%) and in patients with progressive disease (PD) it was observed in 12/54 patients (22%). An increase in chromogranin A by ≥20% compared to baseline was observed in 76 patients (29%). This was present in 34% of patients who eventually had PD and 27% of patients who had OR/SD. In 70% of patients this tumour marker returned to baseline levels after therapy. An increase in liver enzymes and chromogranin A is not uncommon after PRRT. In the vast majority of patients this will resolve in follow-up. Clinicians should be aware that these changes may occur due to radiation-induced inflammation or disease progression and that repeated measurements over time are necessary to differentiate between the two.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: focus on bronchial neuroendocrine tumors

Well-differentiated bronchial neuroendocrine tumors (B-NETs) are rare. They represent 1-5 % of all lung cancers. The incidence of these neoplasms has risen over the past 30 years and, especially for advanced or metastatic disease, management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is the most important first-line therapy, in particular in well-differentiated NETs with high somatostatin type receptor (SSTR) expression. In these tumors, the role of mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) inhibitors and the potential utility of other target therapies remain unclear while chemotherapy represents the gold standard treatment only for aggressive forms with low SSTR expression. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging treatment modality for advanced NETs. There are many cumulative evidences about the effectiveness and tolerability of this therapeutic approach, especially in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs. For B-NETs, scientific research is moving more slowly. Here, we performed a review in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with a focus on patients with inoperable or metastatic well-differentiated B-NETs.

Diagnostic imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN): tumor detection, staging, prognosis, and response to treatment

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) are rare malignancies arising from neuroendocrine cells of the pancreas. Functional tumors can present with specific clinical syndromes due to hormonal secretion. These tumors can present as incidental findings on imaging performed for unrelated purposes or they are diagnosed when workup is initiated in patients with specific syndromes or metastases. This article presents an overview of available imaging techniques focusing on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Recommendations regarding examination protocols are given. Typical imaging features of pNEN and metastases are described. Their potential value for the evaluation of prognosis as well as tumor response under treatment is discussed.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with (177)Lu-DOTATATE in advanced bronchial carcinoids: prognostic role of thyroid transcription factor 1 and (18)F-FDG PET

PURPOSE

Typical and atypical carcinoids (TC and AC) represent 20 - 25 % of all neuroendocrine tumours. No standard therapeutic approach is available for patients with advanced disease. The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with (177)Lu-DOTATATE (Lu-PRRT) and the role of thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) and (18)F-FDG PET as prognostic factors in patients with advanced TC or AC.

METHODS

A total of 34 consecutive patients with radiologically documented progressive disease were treated with Lu-PRRT at a therapeutic cumulative activity of 18.5 or 27.8 GBq in four or five cycles according to the patient's kidney function and bone marrow reserve. Information on TTF-1 was available in all patients. FDG PET studies prior to Lu-PRRT were available in 29 patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 29 months (range 7 - 69 months). The disease control rate (DCR) in patients with TC was 80 %: 6 % complete response, 27 % partial response and 47 % stable disease. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 20.1 months (95 % CI 11.8 - 26.8 months). Stable disease was achieved in 47 % of patients with AC with a mPFS of 15.7 months (95 % CI 10.6 - 25.9 months). No major acute or delayed toxicity occurred in either group or with either cumulative activity. mPFS in patients with TTF-1-negative TC was 26.3 months (95 % CI 12.9 - 45.2 months), but in patients with TTF-1-positive TC mPFS was 7.2 months (4.2 - 14.0 months; p = 0.0009). FDG PET was negative in 13 patients (10 TC and 3 AC) and positive in 16 patients (4 TC and 12 AC). The mPFS in the FDG PET-negative group was 26.4 months (95 % CI 14.2 - 48.9 months) and 15.3 months (11.7 - 31.1 months) in the FDG PET-positive group.

CONCLUSION

Lu-PRRT showed antitumour activity in terms of DCR and PFS and proved safe, even in patients with a higher risk of side effects. TTF-1 would appear to be a prognostic factor. FDG PET positivity in bronchial carcinoids is a hallmark of aggressive tumour and is more frequent in patients with AC than in those with TC.

The status of neuroendocrine tumor imaging: from darkness to light?

Diagnostic imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, staging, treatment selection and follow-up for neuroendocrine tumors. The available diagnostic strategies are morphologic imaging, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound techniques, and molecular imaging, including scintigraphy with (111)In-pentetreotide and positron emission tomography with (68)Ga-DOTA-peptides, (18)F-DOPA and (11)C-5-HTP. A combination of anatomic and functional techniques is routinely performed to optimize sensitivity and specificity. The introduction of diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques represents a promising advance in radiologic imaging, whereas new receptor-binding peptides, including somatostatin agonists and antagonists, represent the recent most favorable innovation in molecular imaging. Future development includes the short-term validation of these techniques, but in extension also a more comprehensive multilevel integration of biologic information pertaining to a specific tumor and patient, possibly encompassing genomic considerations, currently evolving as a new entity denoted 'precision medicine'. The ideal is a diagnostic sequence that captures the global status of an individual's tumor and encompasses a multidimensional characterization of tumor location, metabolic performance and target identification. To date, advances in imagery have focused on increasing resolution, discrimination and functional characterization. In the future, the fusion of imagery with the parallel analysis of biological and genomic information has the potential to considerably amplify diagnosis.

Feasibility and operator variability of myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements with ⁹⁹mTc-sestamibi quantitative dynamic SPECT/CT imaging

PURPOSE

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with dynamic SPECT could lead to widespread utilization of MBF imaging in clinical practice with little cost increase over current standard SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. This work evaluates the feasibility and operator-dependent variability of MBF and flow reserve measurements with (99m)Tc-sestamibi (MIBI) dynamic SPECT imaging using a standard dual-head SPECT camera.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients underwent dipyridamole-stress and rest imaging with dynamic SPECT/CT acquisition. Quantitative images were iteratively reconstructed with all physical corrections and then myocardial and arterial blood regions of interest (ROI) were defined semi-automatically. A compartmental model was fitted to these ROI-sampled time-activity-curves, and flow-dependent MIBI extraction correction was applied to derive regional MBF values. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was estimated as stress/rest MBF ratio. MBF and MFR in low and high risk populations were evaluated for ability to detect disease. Images were each processed twice (≥7 days apart) by one expert and one novice operator to evaluate intra- and inter-operator variability of MBF and MFR measurement in the three coronary artery vascular territories.

RESULTS

Mean rest flow, stress flow, and MFR values were 0.83, 1.82 mL·minute(-1)·g(-1), and 2.45, respectively. For stress/rest MFR, the inter-operator reproducibility was r(2) = 0.86 with RPC = 1.1. Stress MBF and MFR were significantly reduced (P < .05) in high risk (n = 9) vs low risk populations (n = 19), indicating ability to detect disease. For expert and novice operators very good intra-operator correlations of r(2) = 0.98 and 0.95 (n = 168, P < .001) were observed for combined rest and stress regional flow values. Bland-Altman reproducibility coefficients (RPC) were 0.25 and 0.47 mL·minute(-1)·g(-1) for the expert and novice operators, respectively (P < .001). Inter-operator correlation was r(2) = 0.91 and Bland-Altman RPC = 0.58 mL·minute(-1)·g(-1) (n = 336).

CONCLUSIONS

MBF and reserve measurements using (99m)Tc-sestamibi on a traditional, two-headed camera with fast rotation and with quantitative dynamic SPECT appears to be feasible, warranting further investigation.

177 Lu-Dota-octreotate radionuclide therapy of advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: results from a phase II study

PURPOSE

We evaluated the activity and safety profile of (177)Lu-Dotatate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (Lu-PRRT) in patients with advanced, well-differentiated (G1-G2) gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs).

METHODS

Forty-three patients with radiological tumor progression at baseline and a positive Octreoscan® completed the treatment with Lu-PRRT, resulting in the cumulative activity of 18.5 or 27.8 GBq in five cycles. Total activity was scheduled on the basis of kidney function or bone marrow reserve.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (58 %) patients were treated with a "standard" Lu-PRRT full dosage (FD) of 25.7 GBq (range 22.2-27.8), while the remaining 18 patients (42 %) who, at enrolment, showed a higher probability of developing kidney or bone marrow toxicity received a reduced dosage (RD) of 18.4 GBq (range 14.4-20.4). According to SWOG criteria, the overall response was complete response (CR) in (7 %) cases and stable disease (SD) in 33 (77 %), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 84 %. Median response duration was 25 months (range 7-50). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 36 months (95 % CI 24-nr), and median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached. Remarkably, none of the patients, including those at a higher risk of toxicity, showed side-effects after either dosage of Lu-PRRT.

CONCLUSION

Lu-PRRT was shown to be an effective therapeutic option in our patients with advanced progressive GI-NETs, showing an 84 % DCR (95 % CI 73-95) that lasted for 25 months and a PFS of 36 months. Both activities of 27.8 GBq and 18.5 GBq proved safe and effective in all patients, including those with a higher probability of developing kidney or bone marrow toxicity.