1
|
Mazzone E, Thomson A, Chen DC, Cannoletta D, Quarta L, Pellegrino A, Gandaglia G, Moon D, Eapen R, Lawrentschuk N, Montorsi F, Siva S, Hofman MS, Chiti A, Briganti A, Perera ML, Murphy DG. The Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Assessment of Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2025:S0302-2838(25)00285-4. [PMID: 40393864 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2025] [Revised: 04/21/2025] [Accepted: 05/06/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Positron emission tomography (PET) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands has an established role in the assessment of recurrence of prostate cancer (PC) after primary treatment. However, an updated understanding of its diagnostic utility is warranted, particularly in the context of emerging targeted and systemic treatment options for recurrent PC. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSMA PET for staging and detection of local or metastatic disease in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following definitive treatment for PC. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (Web of Science/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to April 25, 2024) and meta-analysis. Eligible retrospective and prospective studies had extractable data on PSMA PET for patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects models were used to evaluate PSMA PET positivity rates across clinical subgroups stratified by PSA, primary treatment, PSMA PET radioligand, and anatomic lesion sites. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 43 studies (8119 patients) were included. PSMA PET positivity rates varied substantially among patients with BCR after primary definitive treatment, with significant study heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.6; p < 0.001), which was mitigated in part after stratification by PSA category. Positivity rates were significantly higher after RT (92%) than after RP (60%; p < 0.001). PSMA PET positivity by anatomic location was 23% for local recurrence, 32% for pelvic nodes, 14% for extrapelvic nodes, 16% for bone metastases, and just 1% for visceral metastases. The positivity rate increased with PSA, from 48% at PSA 0.2-0.5 ng/ml to >90% at PSA >2 ng/ml. Gleason score (GS) at RP did not significantly influence the positivity rate (50% for GS ≤7 vs 62% for GS 8-10; p = 0.08). Heterogeneity limits the generalisability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS We observed substantial variability in PSMA PET positivity rates in BCR because of significant study heterogeneity, mostly related to differences in treatment type, PSA, and anatomic sites. In post-RP BCR, approximately half of patients undergoing PSMA PET had positive findings, even at low PSA (0.2-0.5 ng/ml). In the post-RT setting, PSMA PET use was generally aligned with the Phoenix criterion for BCR, with most studies performing PSMA PET at PSA ≥2 ng/ml. Further research is needed to refine PSA thresholds for PSMA PET, particularly in the post-RT setting, and to assess its role in guiding salvage treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Mazzone
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alice Thomson
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David C Chen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Moon
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Clinical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marlon L Perera
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Juweid ME, Al‐Qasem SF, Khuri FR, Gallamini A, Lohmann P, Ziellenbach H, Mottaghy FM. Beyond fluorodeoxyglucose: Molecular imaging of cancer in precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2025; 75:226-242. [PMID: 40183513 PMCID: PMC12061632 DOI: 10.3322/caac.70007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2025] [Revised: 02/23/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Cancer molecular imaging is the noninvasive visualization of a process unique to or altered in neoplasia, such as proliferation, glucose metabolism, and receptor expression, which is relevant to patient management. Several molecular imaging modalities are now available, including magnetic resonance, optical, and nuclear imaging. Nuclear imaging, particularly using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, is widely used in the staging and response assessment of multiple cancer types. However, at this writing, new nuclear medicine probes, especially positron emission tomography tracers, are increasingly used or are being investigated for cancer evaluation. This review focuses on these probes, their biologic targets, and the applications or potential applications for their use in the assessment of various neoplasms, including both probes available for commercial use-such as somatostatin receptor ligands in neuroendocrine tumors, prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in prostate cancer, norepinephrine analogs in neural crest tumors like neuroblastoma, and estrogen analogs in breast cancer-and others in clinical development, such as fibroblast-activating protein inhibitors, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 ligands, and monoclonal antibodies targeting receptor tyrosine kinases, CD4-positive or CD8-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and cancer stem cell biomarkers. These developments represent a major step toward the integration of molecular imaging as a powerful tool in precision medicine, with an expectedly significant impact on patient management and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malik E. Juweid
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSchool of MedicineUniversity of JordanAmmanJordan
- The National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and GeneticsUniversity of JordanAmmanJordan
| | - Soud F. Al‐Qasem
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineSchool of MedicineUniversity of JordanAmmanJordan
| | - Fadlo R. Khuri
- Division of OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon
| | - Andrea Gallamini
- Research and Innovation DepartmentAntoine Lacassagne Cancer CenterNiceFrance
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital AachenRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
- Medical Imaging Physics (INM‐4)Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center JuelichJuelichGermany
| | | | - Felix M. Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital AachenRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtthe Netherlands
- Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)CologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li S, Nguyen A, Counter W, John NC, De Leon J, Hruby G, Joshua AM, Stricker P, Crumbaker M, Ayati N, Chan L, Sabahi Z, Swiha M, Kneebone A, Wong K, Liu V, Sharma S, Agrawal S, Emmett LM. Utility of 64Cu-Sarcophagine-Bombesin PET/CT in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer and Negative or Equivocal Findings on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1371-1375. [PMID: 39089814 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite a high detection rate of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer, a significant proportion of men have negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, targeted by the copper-chelated bombesin analog 64Cu-sarcophagine-bombesin (SAR-BBN) PET/CT, is also overexpressed in prostate cancer. In this prospective imaging study, we investigate the detection rate of 64Cu-SAR-BBN PET/CT in patients with BCR and negative or equivocal 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Methods: Men with confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, prior definitive therapy, and BCR (defined as a prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level > 0.2 ng/mL) with negative or equivocal 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results within 3 mo were eligible for enrollment. 64Cu-SAR-BBN PET/CT scans were acquired at 1 and 3 h after administration of 200 MBq of 64Cu-SAR-BBN, with further delayed imaging undertaken optionally at 24 h. PSA (ng/mL) was determined at baseline. All PET (PSMA and bombesin) scans were assessed visually. Images were read with masking of the clinical results by 2 experienced nuclear medicine specialists, with a third reader in cases of discordance. Accuracy was defined using a standard of truth that included biopsy confirmation, confirmatory imaging, or response to targeted treatment. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Prior definitive therapy was radical prostatectomy (n = 24, 96%) or radiotherapy (n = 1, 4%). The median time since definitive therapy was 7 y (interquartile range [IQR], 4-11 y), and the Gleason score was 7 or less (n = 15, 60%), 8 (n = 3, 12%), or 9 (n = 7, 28%). The median PSA was 0.69 ng/mL (IQR, 0.28-2.45 ng/mL). Baseline PSMA PET scans were negative in 19 patients (76%) and equivocal in 6 (24%). 64Cu-SAR-BBN PET-avid disease was identified in 44% (11/25): 12% (3/25) with local recurrence, 20% (5/25) with pelvic node metastases, and 12% (3/25) with distant metastases. The κ-score between readers was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.16-0.82). Patients were followed up for a median of 10 mo (IQR, 9-12 mo). Bombesin PET/CT results were true-positive in 5 of 25 patients (20%), false-positive in 2 of 25 (8%), false-negative in 7 of 25 (28%), and unverified in 11 of 25 (44%). Conclusion: 64Cu-SAR-BBN PET/CT demonstrated sites of disease recurrence in 44% of BCR cases with negative or equivocal 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. Further evaluation to confirm diagnostic benefit is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherrington Li
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Nguyen
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - William Counter
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nikeith C John
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - George Hruby
- Genesis Cancer Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Kinghorn Cancer Care Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phillip Stricker
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
| | - Megan Crumbaker
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Narjess Ayati
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lyn Chan
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zahra Sabahi
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mina Swiha
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Keith Wong
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Victor Liu
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shikha Sharma
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shikha Agrawal
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kinghorn Cancer Care Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise M Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang X, Ma Z. Head-to-head comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Urol 2024; 18:177-184. [PMID: 39219632 PMCID: PMC11337997 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in comparison to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods We conducted a comprehensive search for articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning the inception of the database until October 26, 2022, which included head-to-head comparisons of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for assessing the biochemical recurrence of PCa. Results A total of 5 studies including 228 patients were analyzed. The overall positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa after final treatment were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.89) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36-0.88), respectively. The positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and bone metastases were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.30-0.47) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22-0.67), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35-0.56) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17-0.35), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.11-0.31) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.25), respectively. Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT exhibited a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastases, and no significant difference in the positivity rate of local recurrence was observed between these 2 imaging modalities. Conclusions Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT appears to have a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa. Although both imaging methods showed similar positivity rates of detecting local recurrence, PSMA PET/CT outperformed PSMA PET/CT in detecting lymph node involvement and overall recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhe Ma
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chamois J, Septans A, Schipman B, Gross E, Blanchard N, Passerat V, Debelleix C, Hemery C, Latorzeff I, Pointreau Y. Metastases-directed radiotherapy in castration resistant oligo metastatic prostate cancer: A multicentric retrospective study from the French group COLib. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100762. [PMID: 38572302 PMCID: PMC10987832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Oligometastases are defined as a number of detectable metastases less or equal to 5. In castrate-resistant oligo metastatic prostate Cancer (CR oligoM PC), Metastases-Directed Ablative radiotherapy (MDRT) is poorly investigated. Our study retrospectively reviewed the cases of CR oligoM PC treated with MDRT in 8 French high-volume radiotherapy centers. OS and PFS are defined as the delay between the first day of MDRT and death (OS) or progression according to PCWG criteria (PFS). OS and PFS are evaluated according to Kaplan Meyer, curves are compared with log rank test. Logistic regression was used to identify predictive factors for outcome: bone versus node metastasis, ISUP grade, PSA doubling Time (PSADT) at the time of MDRT, time to castration resistance. 107 patients were included in the study, among those 197 metastases received MDRT. For the overall population, the median follow-up was 25.2 months (1,4-145). OS was 93 % at 2 years and 81,4% at 3 years. At 2 years, 100 % of patients with node-only metastasis were alive versus 88,7% among those who have bone metastases (p = 0,72). The median PFS was 12,6 months (IC 95 % [9,6; 17]), with no difference among patients with node only disease versus the rest of the cohort. The PFS was 18,2 months (10,0; 32,4) in patients with PSADT >6 months versus 10,7 months (8,9; 14,3) when PSADT was inferior to 6 months. However, this difference did not reach significant. We did not find a correlation neither between ISUP grade (1-2 versus 3-4-5) and PFS, nor between hormone-sensitivity duration and PFS. Patients receiving MDRT for CR oligoM PC have a good prognosis with 81,6% OS at 3 years. PSA DT longer than 6 months could be related to better PFS. MDRT strategy could postpone the onset of new systemic treatment with median PFS >1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Chamois
- Centre Hospitalier privé, Saint Grégoire, France
| | | | - B. Schipman
- Radiotherapie, Institut de Cancerologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - E. Gross
- Radiotherapie, Hopital prive Clairval – Ramsay Sante, Marseille, France
| | - N. Blanchard
- Radiotherapie, Centre de Cancerologie les Dentellieres, Valenciennes, France
| | | | - C. Debelleix
- Radiotherapie, Clinique, Bordeaux Tivoli- Ducos, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - I. Latorzeff
- Radiotherapie, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Y. Pointreau
- Radiotherapie, Institut Interrégional de Cancerologie, Le Mans, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Staal FHE, Janssen J, Oprea-Lager DE, Engelen AM, van Limbergen EJ, Smeenk RJ, de Jong MAA, Budiharto TCG, Jacobs I, Haverkort DMAD, Brouwer CL, Ng Wei Siang K, Langendijk JA, Verzijlbergen JF, de Jong IJ, Noordzij W, Aluwini S. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Target Volume Delineation Guideline for Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiation Therapy: The PERYTON Guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:688-696. [PMID: 37729971 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) scan is the standard imaging procedure for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer postprostatectomy because of its high detection rate at low serum prostate-specific antigen levels. However, existing guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) in prostate bed salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) are primarily based on experience-based clinical consensus and have been validated using conventional imaging modalities. Therefore, this study aimed to optimize CTV definition in sEBRT by using PSMA PET/CT-detected local recurrences (LRs). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with suspected LR on PSMA PET/CT postprostatectomy were retrospectively enrolled in 9 Dutch centers. Anonymized scans were centrally reviewed by an expert nuclear medicine physician. Each boundary of the CTV guideline from the Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie en Urologie (GFRU) was evaluated and adapted to improve the accuracy and coverage of the area at risk of LR (CTV) on PSMA PET/CT. The proposed CTV adaptation was discussed with the radiation oncologists of the participating centers, and final consensus was reached. To assess reproducibility, the participating centers were asked to delineate 3 new cases according to the new PERYTON-CTV, and the submitted contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS After central review, 93 LRs were identified on 83 PSMA PET/CTs. The proposed CTV definition improved the coverage of PSMA PET/CT-detected LRs from 67% to 96% compared with the GFRU-CTV, while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%. The new CTV was highly reproducible, with a mean DSC of 0.82 (range, 0.81-0.83). CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the optimization of CTV definition in postprostatectomy sEBRT by using the pattern of LR detected on PSMA PET/CT. The PERYTON-CTV is highly reproducible across the participating centers and ensures coverage of 96% LRs while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor H E Staal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jorinde Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Evert J van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tom C G Budiharto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Jacobs
- Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut, Vlissingen/Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Fred Verzijlbergen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu Q, Bates A, Guntur P, Shamim SA, Nabi G. Detection Rate of PSMA PET Using Different Ligands in Men with Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:544-563. [PMID: 37770370 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the acknowledged diagnostic detection rate of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer, little is known about the quality of evidence, particularly focusing on prospective studies. Most systematic reviews are based on retrospective reports. RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies reporting the diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET (computed tomography (CT) and MR) for the detection of biochemically recurrent metastatic prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database until March 1, 2023 for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies using PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was to assess diagnostic detection rate of PSMA PET imaging in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. We calculated the pooled overall diagnostic detection rate with 95% CI using a random-effects model and assessed the heterogeneity between the studies including risk of biases estimation. RESULTS A total of 6800 patients from 32 articles were included in this study. The overall detection rate of PSMA PET for prostate cancer was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63, 0.71). For histologically confirmed lymph nodes, the PPV from 13 prospective studies containing 1496 patients was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93, 0.99). We performed a subgroup analysis of PSMA PET detection rates according to categorically grouped Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) values of 0-0.5, 0.5-1.0, 1.0-2.0, and >2.0 ng/ml and obtained detection rates of 0.44, 0.63, 0.82, and 0.94, respectively. The detection rate of 18F PSMA was better in men with a PSA between 1 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml in comparison to 68Ga PSMA (0.91 with 95% CI 0.81-0.99 vs. 0.79 with 95% CI 0.73, 0.85). CONCLUSION PSMA PET imaging provides a good detection rate for the metastatic recurrence of prostate cancer in men with biochemical relapse following radical treatment. The detection rate improves significantly above a serum PSA value of 1 ng/ml. The diagnostic detection rate of 18F-PSMA is best at PSA values between 1 and 2 ng/ml, in comparison to 68Ga PSMA. This conclusion is heavily biased, further research needs to focus on better methodology to minimize the risk of biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiushuo Wu
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
| | - Anthony Bates
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Shamim Ahmed Shamim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Swiha M, Ayati N, Oprea-Lager DE, Ceci F, Emmett L. How to Report PSMA PET. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:14-29. [PMID: 37558507 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer diagnosed in men in most developed countries and a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has become a valuable tool in the staging and assessment of disease recurrence in PCa, and more recently for assessment for treatment eligibility to PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). Harmonization of PSMA-PET interpretation and synoptic reports are needed to communicate concisely and reproducibly PSMA-PET/CT to referring physicians and to support clinician therapeutic management decisions in various stages of the disease. Uniform image interpretation is also important to provide comparable data between clinical trials and to translate such data from research to daily practice. This review provides an overview of the value of PSMA-PET across the different clinical stages of PCa, discusses published reporting criteria for PSMA-PET, identifies pitfalls in reporting PSMA, and provides recommendations for synoptic reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Swiha
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Narjess Ayati
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University. Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ah-Thiane L, Sargos P, Chapet O, Jolicoeur M, Terlizzi M, Salembier C, Boustani J, Prevost C, Gaudioz S, Derashodian T, Palumbo S, De Hertogh O, Créhange G, Zilli T, Supiot S. Managing postoperative biochemical relapse in prostate cancer, from the perspective of the Francophone group of Urological radiotherapy (GFRU). Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 120:102626. [PMID: 37734178 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Up to 50% of patients treated with radical surgery for localized prostate cancer may experience biochemical recurrence that requires appropriate management. Definitions of biochemical relapse may vary, but, in all cases, consist of an increase in a PSA without clinical or radiological signs of disease. Molecular imaging through to positron emission tomography has taken a preponderant place in relapse diagnosis, progressively replacing bone scan and CT-scan. Prostate bed radiotherapy is currently a key treatment, the action of which should be potentiated by androgen deprivation therapy. Nowadays perspectives consist in determining the best combination therapies, particularly thanks to next-generation hormone therapies, but not exclusively. Several trials are ongoing and should address these issues. We present here a literature review aiming to discuss the current management of biochemical relapse in prostate cancer after radical surgery, in lights of recent findings, as well as future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loic Ah-Thiane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Marjory Jolicoeur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charles Le Moyne Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mario Terlizzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Célia Prevost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Sonya Gaudioz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Talar Derashodian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Samuel Palumbo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU UCL Namur-Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Hertogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHR Verviers East Belgium, Verviers, Belgium
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau, St-Herblain, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tremblay S, Alhogbani M, Weickhardt A, Davis ID, Scott AM, Hicks RJ, Metser U, Chua S, Davda R, Punwani S, Payne H, Tunariu N, Ho B, Young S, Singbo MNU, Bauman G, Emmett L, Pouliot F. Influence of molecular imaging on patient selection for treatment intensification prior to salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a post hoc analysis of the PROPS trial. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:57. [PMID: 37291656 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00570-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of molecular imaging (MI) on patient management after biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy has been described in many studies. However, it is not known if MI-induced management changes are appropriate. This study aimed to determine if androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) management plan is improved by MI in patients who are candidates for salvage radiation therapy. METHODS Data were analyzed from the multicenter prospective PROPS trial evaluating PSMA/Choline PET in patients being considered for salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with BCR after prostatectomy. We compared the pre- and post-MI ADT management plans for each patient and cancer outcomes as predicted by the MSKCC nomogram. A higher percentage of predicted BCR associated with ADT treatment intensification after MI was considered as an improvement in a patient's management. RESULTS Seventy-three patients with a median PSA of 0.38 ng/mL were included. In bivariate analysis, a positive finding on MI (local or metastatic) was associated with decision to use ADT with an odds ratio of 3.67 (95% CI, 1.25 to 10.71; p = 0.02). No factor included in the nomogram was associated with decision to use ADT. Also, MI improved selection of patients to receive ADT based on predicted BCR after sRT : the predicted nomogram 5-year biochemical-free survivals were 52.5% and 43.3%, (mean difference, 9.2%; 95% CI 0.8 to 17.6; p = 0.03) for sRT alone and ADT±sRT subgroups, while there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups before MI. CONCLUSIONS PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT before sRT can potentially improve patient ADT management by directing clinicians towards more appropriate intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew Weickhardt
- Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Ur Metser
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sue Chua
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Bao Ho
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Glenn Bauman
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Benziane-Ouaritini N, Zilli T, Giraud A, Ingrosso G, Di Staso M, Trippa F, Pommier P, Meyer E, Francolini G, Schick U, Pasquier D, Marc Cosset J, Magne N, Martin E, Gnep K, Renard-Penna R, Anger E, Achard V, Giraud N, Aristei C, Ferrari V, Pasquier C, Zaine H, Osman O, Detti B, Perennec T, Mihoci I, Supiot S, Latorzeff I, Sargos P. Prostatectomy Bed Image-guided Dose-escalated Salvage Radiotherapy (SPIDER): An International Multicenter Retrospective Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00067-6. [PMID: 37059627 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of macroscopic local recurrence (MLR) after radical prostatectomy is a challenging situation with no standardized approach. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of functional image-guided salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with MLR in the prostate bed. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this international multicenter retrospective study across 16 European centers, eligible patients were initially treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection for localized or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured 4 wk after RP was <0.1 ng/ml. All patients presented a biochemical relapse after RP defined by an increase in PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/ml on two successive measures. Only patients with an MLR lesion in the prostatectomy bed visualized on functional imaging (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/computed tomography [PET/CT] choline, or PET/CT prostate-specific membrane antigen) were eligible. Patients with lymph node, bone, or visceral dissemination at restaging imaging (CT and/or bone scintigraphy and/or magnetic resonance imaging and/or PET) were excluded. Dose escalation was defined as a dose of >66 Gy prescribed to the prostate bed or to MLR. Toxicities were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale, version 4.03. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were metastasis-free survival (MPFS), biochemical progression-free survival, and overall survival. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between January 2000 and December 2019, 310 patients received at least one dose escalation on MLR and 25 patients did not receive any dose escalation. The median PSA level before SRT was 0.63 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 0.27-1.7). The median follow-up was 54 mo (IQR, 50-56). Five-year PFS and MPFS were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [64; 75]) and 84% (95% CI: [78; 88]), respectively. Grade ≥2 GU and GI late toxicities were observed in 43 (12%) and 11 (3%) patients, respectively. When the prescribed dose on the MLR lesion was ≥72 Gy, an improvement in 5-yr PFS was found for patients received at least one dose escalation (73% [95% CI: 65-79]) vs 60% [95% CI: 48; 70]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary study integrating functional imaging data, we found potential efficacy of SRT with dose escalation ≥72 Gy for patients with MLR in the prostate bed and with an acceptable toxicity profile. Prospective data exploring this MLR dose escalation strategy are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, we looked at the outcomes from salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer and macroscopic relapse in a large European population. We found that outcomes varied with prostate-specific antigen at relapse, Gleason score, and dose escalation. We found potential efficacy of salvage radiotherapy with dose escalation for macroscopic relapse in the prostate bed, with an acceptable toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Antoine Giraud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Mario Di Staso
- Department of Clinical Medicine Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saint Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Pascal Pommier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Meyer
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | - Ulrike Schick
- Department of Radiotherapy, Morvan Hospital Brest, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Oscar Lambret Cancer Centre, Lille, France
| | | | - Nicolas Magne
- Department of Radiotherapy, St Etienne University, St Etienne, France
| | - Etienne Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Georges-François Leclerc Centre, Dijon, France
| | - Kémara Gnep
- Department of Radiotherapy, Eugene Marquis Cancer Institute, Rennes, France
| | - Raphaelle Renard-Penna
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hopital Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Ewen Anger
- Department of Radiotherapy, Eugene Marquis Cancer Institute, Rennes, France
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Giraud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Victoria Ferrari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Centre, Nice, France
| | - Corentin Pasquier
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Hind Zaine
- Department of Radiotherapy, Oscar Lambret Cancer Centre, Lille, France
| | - Osman Osman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Tanguy Perennec
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research Western France, St Herblain, France
| | - Inga Mihoci
- Department of Clinical Medicine Life Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research Western France, St Herblain, France
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Horsley PJ, Koo CM, Eade T, Hsiao E, Emmett L, Brown C, Kneebone A, Hruby G. Mapping of Local Recurrences After Radical Prostatectomy Using 68-Gallium-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Implications for Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy Clinical Target Volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:106-117. [PMID: 35716849 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective is to describe the distribution of local recurrences after radical prostatectomy (RP) as delineated using 68-Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) to identify areas where current consensus guideline clinical target volumes (CTVs) are insufficient or excessive and to identify predictors of recurrence location within the fossa. METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective review of databases from 2 tertiary referral centers was performed to identify patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for biochemical recurrence after RP. Those with a component of local recurrence were included for further analysis. The epicenter of each recurrence was defined relative to reference points in 3 axes, categorized into 1 of 7 levels in the superior/inferior axis relative to the vesicourethral anastomosis, and recorded as within or outside the Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genito-urinary Group (FROGG) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus CTVs. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence location based on clinical and histopathologic variables. RESULTS One thousand forty-nine 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were reviewed. One hundred forty sites of local recurrence were identified on 132 scans. Relative to the vesicourethral anastomosis, 13 (9%), 31 (22%), 17 (12%), 24 (17%), 27 (19%), 20 (14%), and 8 (6%) recurrences occurred >5 mm inferior; within 5 mm above or below; and 6 to 15 mm, 16 to 25 mm, 26 to 35 mm, 36 to 45 mm, and >45 mm superiorly, respectively. Thirteen (9%) and 2 (1.4%) recurrences occurred beyond the FROGG and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus CTVs, respectively, with all below the inferior CTV margin. CONCLUSIONS In the largest study to date mapping local recurrences after RP in 3-dimensions, we provide several insights to inform future contouring guidelines; in particular, 9% of recurrences occurred inferior to the FROGG CTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Horsley
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Chung Mo Koo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Brown
- NHMRC Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beyer T, Czernin J, Freudenberg L, Giesel F, Hacker M, Hicks RJ, Krause BJ. A 2022 International Survey on the Status of Prostate Cancer Theranostics. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:47-53. [PMID: 35953304 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Growing interest in PSMA imaging using [68Ga]- or [18F]-labeled ligands and PSMA-based radioligand therapy (RLT) of prostate cancer (PCa) prompted us to survey the global community on their experiences and expectations. Methods: A web-based survey was composed to interrogate areas specific to PET imaging, the clinical value chain, and RLT applications. International responses were collected in early 2022. In total, over 300 valid responses were received and evaluated. Results: Most responses (83%) were given by nuclear medicine specialists with extensive experience in PET. At 22% of sites, PCa ranked "top" in cancer-type-specific PET indications, with an average and median of 15% and 10% of all cases, respectively. The most frequently used PSMA PET tracers were [68Ga]PSMA (32%) and [18F]PSMA-1007 (31%). Users reported a steady growth in PSMA PET and RLT over the past 5 y, averaging 50% and 82%, respectively, with a further 100% median growth projected over the next 5 y. Of note, more respondents indicated cognizance of personalized dosimetry than actually used it routinely. The most commonly identified barriers to future growth in PCa theranostics were radiopharmaceutical supply, reimbursement, staff availability, and buy-in of medical oncologists. Conclusion: Despite enthusiasm, this survey indicates variable adoption of PSMA imaging and RLT globally. Several challenges need to be addressed by the medical community, authorities, and patient advocacy groups in integrating PSMA-targeted theranostics into personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Beyer
- QIMP Team, Centre Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Frederik Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- The Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; and
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Rostock University Medical Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pinot F, Le Pennec R, Abgral R, Blanc-Béguin F, Hennebicq S, Schick U, Valeri A, Fournier G, Le Roux PY, Salaun PY, Robin P. PSMA-11 PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer in Patients With Negative Choline PET/CT. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:248-257. [PMID: 36658064 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate adenocarcinoma (CaP) is the leading cancer in men. After curative treatment, from 27% to 53% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence (BR). With the development of focal therapies, precise early identification of recurrence's sites is of utmost importance in order to deliver individualized treatment on positive lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the detection rate (DR) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in selected patients with prostate cancer BR and recent negative 18F-choline PET/CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis including all patients with CaP referred for BR with a negative 18F-choline PET/CT, and who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT between October, 2018 and December, 2019. The overall DR of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was calculated, and described according to BR characteristics especially PSA levels and velocity. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Patient management following 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and PSA levels evolution after treatment were also recorded. RESULTS One hundred fifty-nine patients comprising 164 examinations were analyzed. The overall DR of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for BR was 65.9% (95CI, 58.6-73.1). The DR was 52.5% (95CI, 39.9-65.0), 70.6% (95CI, 55.3-85.9), 70.4% (95CI, 53.1-87.6), and 78.6% (95CI, 66.2-91.0) for PSA levels between 0.2 and 0.49 ng/mL, 0.5 to 0.99 ng/mL, 1 to 1.99 ng/mL and PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL, respectively. The DR was 70.7% (95CI, 59.0-82.4) with a PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤6 months and 65.2% (95CI, 55.5-74.9) with a PSA-DT >6 months. Around 3/4 of patients (75.9%) with a positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT initiated treatment, including surgery (2.4%), stereotactic radiotherapy ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (22%) or external conformational radiotherapy ± ADT (46.3%). Patient management changed in 43 cases (39.8%). CONCLUSION Our study confirmed the ability of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT to detect occult biochemical recurrence, even in a selected population of CaP patients with negative 18F-choline PET/CT, even at low PSA levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Pinot
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Romain Le Pennec
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Ronan Abgral
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France; Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, GETBO, Brest, France
| | - Frédérique Blanc-Béguin
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France; Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, GETBO, Brest, France
| | - Simon Hennebicq
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France; Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, GETBO, Brest, France
| | - Ulrike Schick
- Département de Radiothérapie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France; Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1101, LaTIM, Brest, France
| | - Antoine Valeri
- Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1101, LaTIM, Brest, France; Département d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Georges Fournier
- Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1101, LaTIM, Brest, France; Département d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Le Roux
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France; Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, GETBO, Brest, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Salaun
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France; Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, GETBO, Brest, France
| | - Philippe Robin
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, Brest, France; Inserm, Univ Brest, CHU Brest, UMR 1304, GETBO, Brest, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Laudicella R, La Torre F, Davì V, Crocè L, Aricò D, Leonardi G, Russo S, Minutoli F, Burger IA, Baldari S. Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Resulted Negative on [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 but Positive on [ 18F]Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT. Tomography 2022; 8:2471-2474. [PMID: 36287804 PMCID: PMC9609559 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8050205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
For prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR), the primarily suggested imaging technique by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines is prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT). Indeed, the increased detection rate of PSMA PET/CT for early BCR has led to a fast and wide acceptance of this novel technology. However, PCa is a very heterogeneous disease, not always easily assessable with the highly specific PSMA PET with around 10% of cases occuring without PSMA expression. In this paper, we present the case of a patient with PCa BCR that resulted negative on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, but positive on [18F]Fluoromethylcholine (Choline) PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| | - Flavia La Torre
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Valerio Davì
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Ludovica Crocè
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Demetrio Aricò
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Oncological Centre of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Leonardi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Simona Russo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Fabio Minutoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Irene A. Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
| | - Sergio Baldari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alberts I, Bütikofer L, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A. A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT-Protocol design and rationale. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270269. [PMID: 35853017 PMCID: PMC9295986 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A number of radiopharmaceuticals are available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), but few comparative imaging trials have been performed comparing them. In particular, there are no prospective head-to-head comparisons of the recently introduced [18F]PSMA-1007 to the existing standard of care [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The purpose of this trial is to establish the non-inferiority of the new radiopharmaceutical in terms of the rate of PET-positive findings and to obtain an intra-individual comparison of accuracy and radiopharmaceutical kinetics. Methods In this cross-over trial we will randomise 100 individuals to receive either first a standard-of-care PET/CT using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 followed by an additional [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within 2 weeks, or vice-versa. Inclusion criteria include patients 18 years and older with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, defined as two consecutive prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 0.2 ng/ml. Detection rate at the patient-based level is the primary end-point. Each scan will be interpreted by a panel of six independent and masked readers (three for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and three for [18F]PSMA-1007) which consensus majority in cases of discrepancy. To confirm the PET-positivity rate at a patient based level, follow up at 6 months following the first scan will be performed to a composite standard of truth. Secondary endpoints shall include an intra-individual comparison of radiopharmaceutical-kinetics, per-region detection rate and positive predictive value. Discussion This is the first randomised prospective comparative imaging trial to compare the established [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 with [18F]PSMA-1007 and will determine whether the new radiopharmaceutical is non-inferior to the established standard-of-care in terms of patient-level detection rate. Clinical trial registration Registered with and approved by the regional ethics authority #2020–02903 (submitted 09.12.2020, approval 16.12.2021) and the regulatory authority SwissMedic 2020DR2103. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05079828 and additionally in a national language in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang Y, Galante JR, Haroon A, Wan S, Afaq A, Payne H, Bomanji J, Adeleke S, Kasivisvanathan V. The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:475-493. [PMID: 35789204 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00618-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET-CT has been shown in numerous studies to be superior to conventional imaging in the detection of nodal or distant metastatic lesions. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is now recommended by many guidelines for the detection of biochemically relapsed disease after radical local therapy. PSMA radioligands can also function as radiotheranostics, and Lu-PSMA has been shown to be a potential new line of treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whole-body (WB) MRI has been shown to have a high diagnostic performance in the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease. Prospective, randomized, multicentre studies comparing 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and WB MRI for pelvic nodal and metastatic disease detection are yet to be performed. Challenges for interpretation of PSMA include tracer trapping in non-target tissues and also urinary excretion of tracers, which confounds image interpretation at the vesicoureteral junction. Additionally, studies have shown how long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affects PSMA expression and could, therefore, reduce tracer uptake and visibility of PSMA+ lesions. Furthermore, ADT of short duration might increase PSMA expression, leading to the PSMA flare phenomenon, which makes the accurate monitoring of treatment response to ADT with PSMA PET challenging. Scan duration, detection of incidentalomas and presence of metallic implants are some of the major challenges with WB MRI. Emerging data support the wider adoption of PSMA PET and WB MRI for diagnosis, staging, disease burden evaluation and response monitoring, although their relative roles in the standard-of-care management of patients are yet to be fully defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yishen Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.
| | - Joao R Galante
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Athar Haroon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Asim Afaq
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dundee P, Furrer MA, Corcoran NM, Peters J, Pan H, Ballok Z, Ryan A, Guerrieri M, Costello AJ. Defining Prostatic Vascular Pedicle Recurrence and the Anatomy of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 41:116-122. [PMID: 35813255 PMCID: PMC9257633 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The term local recurrence in prostate cancer is considered to mean persistent local disease in the prostatic bed, most commonly at the site of the vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA). Since the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of early biochemical recurrence (BCR), we have found histologically confirmed prostate cancer in the prostatic vascular pedicle (PVP). If a significant proportion of local recurrences are distant to the VUA, it may be possible to alter adjuvant and salvage radiation fields in order to reduce the potential morbidity of radiation in selected patients. Objective To describe PVP local recurrence and to map the anatomic pattern of prostate bed recurrence on PSMA PET/CT. Design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective multicentre study of 185 patients imaged with PSMA PET/CT following radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 2016 and November 2018. All patient data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected. Recurrences were documented according to anatomic location. For patients presenting with local recurrence, the precise location of the recurrence within the prostate bed was documented. Intervention PSMA PET/CT for BCR following RP. Results and limitations A total of 43 local recurrences in 41/185 patients (22%) were identified. Tumour recurrence at the PVP was found in 26 (63%), VUA in 15 (37%), and within a retained seminal vesicle and along the anterior rectal wall in the region of the neurovascular bundle in one (2.4%) each. Histological and surgical evidence of PVP recurrence was acquired in two patients. The study is limited by its retrospective nature with inherent selection bias. This is an observational study reporting on the anatomy of local recurrence and does not include follow-up for patient outcomes. Conclusions Our study showed that prostate cancer can recur in the PVP and is distant to the VUA more commonly than previously thought. This may have implications for RP technique and for the treatment of selected patients in the local recurrence setting. Patient summary We investigated more precise identification of the location of tumour recurrence after removal of the prostate for prostate cancer. We describe a new definition of local recurrence in an area called the prostatic vascular pedicle. This new concept may alter the treatment recommended for recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Dundee
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Tel. +61 3 9342 7294.
| | - Marc A. Furrer
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Niall M. Corcoran
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
| | - Justin Peters
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Henry Pan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Andrew Ryan
- Healthcare Imaging Services, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Anthony J. Costello
- Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street Parkville, Australia 3052
- The Australian Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Prostate Cancer Centre, North Melbourne, Australia
- Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lasserre M, Sargos P, Barret E, Beauval JB, Brureau L, Créhange G, Dariane C, Fiard G, Fromont G, Mathieu R, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Ruffion A, Rouprêt M, Ploussard G, Gauthé M. Narrative review of PET/CT performances at biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and impact on patient disease management: Revue narrative à propos des performances de la TEP/TDM en cas de récidive biochimique après prostatectomie radicale dans le cancer de la prostate et impact sur la prise en charge des patients. Prog Urol 2022; 32:6S33-6S42. [PMID: 36719645 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(22)00173-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) may experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) in approximately 30% of cases. Recently, advances in imaging modalities and in particular Positron-Emission Tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging allow for better detection and characterization of lesions outside the prostatic bed at recurrence. Thus, treatment at BCR can be significantly improved by a tailored strategy based on new generation imaging. A more precise and accurate staging of the disease at recurrence paves the way to more appropriate treatment, potentially translating into better survival outcomes of these patients. This review therefore highlights the interest of PET/CT at the time of BCR, its superiority over standard imaging in terms of staging, and its impact on guiding the different therapeutic possibilities depending on the site, number, and volumes of recurrence. Indeed, we will discuss below about different strategies and their indications: salvage radiotherapy of the prostate bed, systemic therapies, stereotactic body radiotherapy and others therapeutical strategies. The various innovative approaches based on PET/CT implementation are partly underway within protocol trials to prove their benefits on clinically meaningful endpoints. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lasserre
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux.
| | - E Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris
| | - J-B Beauval
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31445 Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - L Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, Inserm, EHESP, Irset-UMR_S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - G Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology Curie Institute, 75005 Paris
| | - C Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris-Paris University-U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, 75015 Paris
| | - G Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - G Fromont
- Department of Pathology, CHRU, 37000 Tours, France
| | - R Mathieu
- Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - R Renard-Penna
- Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Department of Medical oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
| | - A Ruffion
- Service d'urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe 2 - Centre d'Innovation en cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY) - Faculté de médecine Lyon Sud - Université Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - M Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris
| | - G Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31445 Quint Fonsegrives, France; Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, Inserm, EHESP, Irset-UMR_S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, France; Department of Radiation Oncology Curie Institute, 75005 Paris; Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris-Paris University-U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, 75015 Paris; Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000 Grenoble, France; Department of Pathology, CHRU, 37000 Tours, France; Department of Urology, CHU Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France; Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France; Service d'urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Equipe 2 - Centre d'Innovation en cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY) - Faculté de médecine Lyon Sud - Université Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France; GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 75013 Paris; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - M Gauthé
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Scintep, 38000 Grenoble
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Predictors of Bone Metastases at 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (HSPC) Patients with Early Biochemical Recurrence or Persistence. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061309. [PMID: 35741119 PMCID: PMC9221902 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen/positron-emission-tomography (PSMA-PET) can accurately detect disease localizations in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with early biochemical recurrence/persistence (BCR/BCP), allowing for more personalized image-guided treatments in oligometastatic patients with major impact in the case of bone metastases (BM). Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors of BM at PSMA-PET in early-BCR/BCP hormone-sensitive PCa (HSPC) patients, previously treated with radical intent (radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy ± salvage-radiotherapy (SRT)). A retrospective analysis was performed on 443 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT scans. The cohort median PSA at PET-scan was 0.60 (IQR: 0.38–1.04) ng/mL. PSMA-PET detection rate was 42.0% (186/443), and distant lesions (M1a/b/c) were found in 17.6% (78/443) of cases. BM (M1b) were present in 9.9% (44/443) of cases, with 70.5% (31/44) showing oligometastatic spread (≤3 PSMA-positive lesions). In the multivariate binary logistic regression model (accuracy: 71.2%, Nagelkerke-R2: 13%), T stage ≥ 3a (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13–5.60; p = 0.024), clinical setting (previous SRT vs. first-time BCR OR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.32–6.35; p = 0.008), and PSAdt (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88–0.99; p = 0.026) were proven to be significant predictors of bone metastases, with a 7% risk increment for each single-unit decrement of PSAdt. These predictors could be used to further refine the indication for PSMA-PET in early BCR/BCP HSPC patients, leading to higher detection rates of bone disease and more personalized treatments.
Collapse
|
22
|
O'Brien JS, McVey A, Kelly BD, Jenjitranant P, Buteau J, Hoffman M, Kasivisvanithan V, Eapen R, Moon D, Murphy DG, Lawrentschuk N. PSMA PET-CT Funding Grants Free Access to Superior Staging for Australian Men with Prostate Cancer. BJU Int 2022; 130 Suppl 3:8-10. [PMID: 35574991 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S O'Brien
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aoife McVey
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian D Kelly
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - James Buteau
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Hoffman
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanithan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC) and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, 3000, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Moon
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:631-637. [PMID: 35438666 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the prospective literature on the role of 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI as a tool for functional imaging in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR), particularly with respect to detection efficacy and impact on management. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed in July 2021, focusing on original prospective studies looking at PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in BCR. RESULTS We included 20 prospective studies reporting on 68Ga and 18F PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI. Pooled PSMA PET positivity was 66.6% out of 2110 patients. The only factor consistently reported as associated with PSMA PET positivity was PSA level at the time of the study. Analysis of PSMA PET positivity rates in differing PSA ranges confirmed increasing positivity with increasing PSA levels. No significant adverse reactions were reported in the 20 studies, but only 6 studies mentioned safety or adverse reactions. A major change of management occurred in 42.7% of all patients scanned with PSMA PET/CT and more specifically 63.2% of those patients positive on PSMA PET/CT. There are no long-term studies that prove a survival benefit from these changes in management. CONCLUSION There is prospective evidence for efficacy of PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI in localizing disease recurrence in BCR, which increases with increasing PSA level at the time of scanning. There are no reported significant adverse effects related to the PSMA PET ligands. There is evidence of major change in management but no evidence for whether this achieves any improvement in outcome.
Collapse
|
24
|
Lengana T, Lawal I, Janse Van Rensburg C, Mokoala K, Moshokoa E, Mazibuko S, Van de Wiele C, Maes A, Vorster M, Sathekge MM. The Diagnostic Performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with Early Recurrence after Definitive Therapy with a PSA <10 ng/ml. Nuklearmedizin 2022; 61:120-129. [PMID: 35421900 DOI: 10.1055/a-1759-1603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM The prostate bed is one of the common sites of early recurrence of prostate cancer. The currently used PSMA ligands (68Ga-PSMA-11 and 99mTc-PSMA) undergo early urinary clearance resulting in interfering physiological activity within and surrounding the prostate. This can result in sites of cancer recurrence being obscured. 18F-PSMA-1007 has an advantage of delayed urinary clearance thus the prostate region is reviewed without any interfering physiological activity. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy. METHODS Forty-six Prostate cancer (mean age 66.7±7.5, range 48-87 years) presenting with biochemical recurrence (median PSA 1.6ng/ml, range 0.1-10.0) underwent non-contrast-enhanced 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. PET/CT findings were evaluated qualitatively and semiquantitatively (SUVmax) and compared to the results of histology, Gleason grade, and conventional imaging. RESULTS Twenty-four of the 46 (52.2%) patients demonstrated a site of recurrence on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Oligometastatic disease was detected in 15 (32.6%) of these patients. Of these 10 (37.5%) demonstrated intra-prostatic recurrence, lymph node disease was noted in 11 (45.8%) whilst two patients demonstrated skeletal metastases. The detection rates for PSA levels 0-<0.5, 0.5-<1, 1-2, >2 were 31.3%, 33.3%, 55.6% and 72.2% respectively. 7 (29.2%) of the positive patients had been described as negative or equivocal on conventional imaging. An optimal PSA cut-off level of 1.3ng/ml was found. CONCLUSION 18F-PSMA-1007 demonstrated good diagnostic performance detecting sites of recurrence. Its ability to detect sites of recurrence in the setting of early biochemical recurrence will have a significant impact on patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thabo Lengana
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Ismaheel Lawal
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Charl Janse Van Rensburg
- Biostatistics Unit, Pretoria MRC, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Kgomotso Mokoala
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | | | - Christophe Van de Wiele
- Nuclear Medicine, Universiteit Gent Faculteit Geneeskunde en Gezondheidswetenschappen, Gent, Belgium
| | - Alex Maes
- Department Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mariza Vorster
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ceci F, Rovera G, Iorio GC, Guarneri A, Chiofalo V, Passera R, Oderda M, Dall'Armellina S, Liberini V, Grimaldi S, Bellò M, Gontero P, Ricardi U, Deandreis D. Event-free survival after 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients eligible for salvage therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3257-3268. [PMID: 35217883 PMCID: PMC9250462 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background/aim Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen/positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) detects with high accuracy disease-recurrence, leading to changes in the management of biochemically-recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, data regarding the oncological outcomes of patients who performed PSMA-PET are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of clinically relevant events during follow-up in patients who performed PSMA-PET for BCR after radical treatment. Materials and methods This analysis included consecutive, hormone-sensitive, hormone-free, recurrent PCa patients (HSPC) enrolled through a prospective study. All patients were eligible for salvage therapy, having at least 24 months of follow-up after PSMA-PET. The primary endpoint was the Event-Free Survival (EFS), defined as the time between the PSMA-PET and the date of event/last follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the EFS curves. EFS was also investigated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Events were defined as death, radiological progression, or PSA recurrence after therapy. Results One-hundred and seventy-six (n = 176) patients were analyzed (median PSA 0.62 [IQR: 0.43–1.00] ng/mL; median follow-up of 35.4 [IQR: 26.5–40.3] months). The EFS was 78.8% at 1 year, 65.2% (2 years), and 52.2% (3 years). Patients experiencing events during study follow-up had a significantly higher median PSA (0.81 [IQR: 0.53–1.28] vs 0.51 [IQR: 0.36–0.80] ng/mL) and a lower PSA doubling time (PSAdt) (5.4 [IQR: 3.7–11.6] vs 12.7 [IQR: 6.6–24.3] months) (p < 0.001) compared to event-free patients. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that PSA > 0.5 ng/mL, PSAdt ≤ 6 months, and a positive PSMA-PET result were associated with a higher event rate (p < 0.01). No significant differences of event rates were observed in patients who received changes in therapy management after PSMA-PET vs. patients who did not receive therapy changes. Finally, PSA > 0.5 ng/mL and PSAdt ≤ 6 months were statistically significant event-predictors in multivariate model (p < 0.001). Conclusion Low PSA and long PSAdt were significant predictors of longer EFS. A lower incidence of events was observed in patients having negative PSMA-PET, since longer EFS was significantly more probable in case of a negative scan. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. .,Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncolology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
| | - Guido Rovera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Guarneri
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Valeria Chiofalo
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Dall'Armellina
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Virginia Liberini
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Grimaldi
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marilena Bellò
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Muheremu A, Wen T, Niu X. PET-CT for the diagnosis and treatment of primary musculoskeletal tumors in Chinese patients - experience from 255 patients in a single center. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210785. [PMID: 34591688 PMCID: PMC8631037 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study was carried out to assess the value of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT on the diagnosis and staging of primary musculoskeletal tumors. METHODS PET-CT test results and histopathological study reports of all the patients with primary musculoskeletal tumors in our department from January 2006 to July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in these PET-CT reports were recorded and analyzed respectively for each type of sarcoma. RESULTS A total of 255 patients were included in the final analysis. Sensitivity of SUVmax based diagnosis was 96.6% for primary malignant osseous sarcomas and 91.2% for soft tissue sarcomas. SUVmax of high-grade osseous sarcomas (average 8.4 ± 5.5) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than low-grade osseous sarcomas (average 3.9 ± 1.8); based on current case series, SUVmax of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (7.5 ± 5.1) was not significantly different (p = 0.229) from that of low-grade soft tissue sarcomas (5.3 ± 3.7). Significant decrease of SUVmax value after chemotherapy was associated with favorable prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma. CONCLUSION Results of the current study indicate that, the SUVmax based application of PET-CT can be a valuable supplementary method to histopathological tests regarding the diagnosis and staging of primary musculoskeletal sarcomas. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE SUVmax based application of PET-CT is a highly sensitive method in diagnosis of primary osseous and soft tissue sarcomas in Chinese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tianlin Wen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui Niu
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
A Prospective Study Assessing the Post-Prostatectomy Detection Rate of a Presumed Local Failure at mpMR with Either 64CuCl 2 or 64CuPSMA PET/CT. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215564. [PMID: 34771726 PMCID: PMC8582802 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of PET/CT with two novel tracers was investigated in prostate cancer patients with both a biochemical failure after surgery and a presumed local failure at multiparametric MR. Overall, both PET tracers detected only about 50% of local failures. Therefore, multiparametric MR remains the exam of choice to investigate the prostatic fossa in patients who fail surgery. Abstract Background: We aimed assess the detection rate (DR) of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with two novel tracers in patients referred for salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with a presumed local recurrence at multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: The present prospective study was conducted at a single institution between August 2017 and June 2020. Eligibility criteria were undetectable PSA after RP; subsequent biochemical recurrence (two consecutive PSA rises to 0.2 ng/mL or greater); a presumed local failure at mpMR; no distant metastases at 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT (CH/PET); no previous history of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were offered both 64CuCl2 PET/CT (CU/PET) and 64Cu-PSMA PET/CT (PSMA/PET) before sRT. After image co-registration, PET findings were compared to mpMR ones in terms of DR and independent predictors of DR investigated at logistic regression. Results: A total of 62 patients with 72 nodules at mpMR were accrued. Compared to mpMR (DR = 100%, 95%CI: 94.9–100%), DRs were 47.2% (95%CI: 36.1–58.6%) and 54.4% (95%CI: 42.7–65.7%) for CU/PET and PSMA/PET, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Both experimental PET/CT performed particularly poorly at PSA levels consistent with early sRT. Conclusions: The two novel radiotracers are inferior to mpMR in restaging the prostatic fossa for sRT planning purposes, particularly in the context of early salvage radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Saperstein L, Pouliot F, Josephson D, Wong JYC, Pantel AR, Cho SY, Gage KL, Piert M, Iagaru A, Pollard JH, Wong V, Jensen J, Lin T, Stambler N, Carroll PR, Siegel BA. Diagnostic Performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from the CONDOR Phase III, Multicenter Study. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:3674-3682. [PMID: 33622706 PMCID: PMC8382991 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 240] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current FDA-approved imaging modalities are inadequate for localizing prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR). 18F-DCFPyL is a highly selective, small-molecule prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted PET radiotracer. CONDOR was a prospective study designed to determine the performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in patients with BCR and uninformative standard imaging. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Men with rising PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL after prostatectomy or ≥2 ng/mL above nadir after radiotherapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was correct localization rate (CLR), defined as positive predictive value with an additional requirement of anatomic lesion colocalization between 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT and a composite standard of truth (SOT). The SOT consisted of, in descending priority (i) histopathology, (ii) subsequent correlative imaging findings, or (iii) post-radiation PSA response. The trial was considered a success if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for CLR exceeded 20% for two of three 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT readers. Secondary endpoints included change in intended management and safety. RESULTS A total of 208 men with a median baseline PSA of 0.8 ng/mL (range: 0.2-98.4 ng/mL) underwent 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. The CLR was 84.8%-87.0% (lower bound of 95% CI: 77.8-80.4). A total of 63.9% of evaluable patients had a change in intended management after 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. The disease detection rate was 59% to 66% (at least one lesion detected per patient by 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT by central readers). CONCLUSIONS Performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT achieved the study's primary endpoint, demonstrating disease localization in the setting of negative standard imaging and providing clinically meaningful and actionable information. These data further support the utility of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT to localize disease in men with recurrent prostate cancer.See related commentary by True and Chen, p. 3512.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven P Rowe
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Gorin
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - David Josephson
- Tower Urology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Austin R Pantel
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steve Y Cho
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kenneth L Gage
- Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Morand Piert
- Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | - Vivien Wong
- Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New York, New York
| | | | - Tess Lin
- Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New York, New York
| | | | - Peter R Carroll
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Health technology assessment for PSMA-PET: striving towards a cost-effective management of prostate cancer. Clin Transl Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00446-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
33
|
Niaz MJ, Sun M, Skafida M, Niaz MO, Ivanidze J, Osborne JR, O'Dwyer E. Review of commonly used prostate specific PET tracers used in prostate cancer imaging in current clinical practice. Clin Imaging 2021; 79:278-288. [PMID: 34182326 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) underperforms in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) due to inherent characteristics of primary and metastatic tumors, including relatively low rate of glucose utilization. Consequently, alternate PCa PET imaging agents targeting other aspects of PCa cell biology have been developed for clinical practice. The most common dedicated PET imaging tracers include 68Ga/18F prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), 11C-Choline, and 18F-fluciclovine (Axumin™). This review will describe how these agents target specific inherent characteristics of PCa and explore the current literature for these agents for both primary and recurrent PCa, comparing the advantages and limitations of each tracer. Both 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluciclovine PET have been shown to detect nodal and osseous disease at higher rates compared to FDG-PET but offer no additional benefit in detecting prostate disease, especially in primary staging. As a result, PSMA PET, specifically 68Ga-PSMA-11, has emerged as a key imaging option for both primary and recurrent cancer. PSMA PET may be more sensitive than MRI at the local level and more sensitive than 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluciclovine PET for distant disease. Furthermore, compared to 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluciclovine PET, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET has higher detection rates at low PSA levels (<2 ng/dL). With improved delineation of disease, PSMA imaging has influenced treatment planning; radiation fields can be narrowed, and patients with isolated or oligo-metastatic disease can be spared systemic therapy. The retrospective nature of many of the studies describing these PCa imaging modalities complicates their assessment and comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Sun
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | - Myrto Skafida
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | | | - Jana Ivanidze
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | - Elisabeth O'Dwyer
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang R, Shen G, Huang M, Tian R. The Diagnostic Role of 18F-Choline, 18F-Fluciclovine and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer With Biochemical Recurrence: A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:684629. [PMID: 34222008 PMCID: PMC8249319 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Diagnosing the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinical challenge, and early detection of BCR can help patients receive optimal treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to define the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT using 18F-labeled choline, fluciclovine, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in patients with BCR. Methods Multiple databases were searched until March 30, 2021. We included studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-choline, 18F-fluciclovine, and 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with BCR. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and detection rate of 18F-labeled tracers were calculated with a random-effects model. Results A total of 46 studies met the included criteria; 17, 16, and 13 studies focused on 18F-choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA, respectively. The pooled sensitivities of 18F-choline and 18F-fluciclovine were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85–0.98) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65–0.897), and the specificities were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.73–0.97) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.50–0.79), respectively. The pooled detection rates of 18F-labeled choline, fluciclovine and PSMA were 66, 74, and 83%, respectively. Moreover, the detection rates of 18F-labeled choline, fluciclovine, and PSMA were 35, 23, and 58% for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/ml; 41, 46, and 75% for a PSA level of 0.5–0.99 ng/ml; 62, 57, and 86% for a PSA level of 1.0–1.99 ng/ml; 80, 92, and 94% for a PSA level more than 2.0 ng/ml. Conclusion These three 18F-labeled tracers are promising for detecting BCR in prostate cancer patients, with 18F-choline showing superior diagnostic accuracy. In addition, the much higher detection rates of 18F-PSMA showed its superiority over other tracers, particularly in low PSA levels. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020212531.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rang Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guohua Shen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingxing Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Rong Tian
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Valle L, Shabsovich D, de Meerleer G, Maurer T, Murphy DG, Nickols NG, Vapiwala N, Calais J, Kishan AU. Use and Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Prior to Salvage Radiation Therapy in Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Scoping Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:339-355. [PMID: 33637464 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The use, common findings, and impact of modern molecular positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging prior to salvage radiation therapy (RT) in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) have not been evaluated comprehensively. OBJECTIVE We performed a scoping systematic review of the literature assessing detection rates, detection patterns, changes in management, as well as changes in patient outcome resulting from molecular PET/CT imaging using three molecular tracers: 18F-fluciclovine, 8Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11, and 18F-DCFPyL. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A computerized bibliographic search of the Medline/PubMed database was carried out from inception to October 1, 2020. We included published reports and abstracts evaluating the utility of 1Fluciclovine, 68Ga-PSMA-11, and 18F-DCFPyL PET in the detection of recurrent disease in the post-RP, pre-salvage RT setting. Outcomes of interest were extracted and tabulated, and existing evidence was synthesized qualitatively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 45 studies were included in our qualitative synthesis. Detection rates were high across most studies, and there was often a clear relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and positive imaging findings. Though limited randomized data are available, there appears to be increased sensitivity with the use of PSMA ligands compared with fluciclovine at low PSA values. Most studies have shown that only one-third to one-half of patients with detected lesions have lesions in the prostatic fossa alone. Management changes occur in nearly 50% of patients undergoing molecular imaging, and biochemical response in patients who undergo molecular PET-based RT planning appears to be statistically superior to the response in patients who undergo conventional imaging -based RT planning alone. High biochemical responses from molecular PET-based salvage RT, ranging from 45% to 94%, did not appear to come at the expense of increased genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity. The presence or absence of avid lesions appears to be a strong prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS Molecular PET/CT imaging in the post-RP, pre-salvage RT setting often triggers management changes that result from detecting lesions in locations not typically included in consensus-driven postoperative RT fields. Ongoing trials will assess the benefit of PSMA PET in guiding salvage RT following RP and determine its impact on long-term outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed and reported detection rates, detection patterns, and changes in management resulting from molecular positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. Prior to the receipt of salvage radiation therapy, molecular tracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen appear to be especially sensitive at identifying the place where prostate cancer has come back after surgery, which can help radiation oncologists better target the recurrent disease and potentially improve the rates of cure from prostate cancer in this setting. Future studies will determine whether these imaging tools will change cure rates and side effects, but early results are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - David Shabsovich
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gert de Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Adaptive sequential plan-on-plan optimization during prostate-specific antigen response guided radiotherapy of recurrent prostate cancer. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 18:5-10. [PMID: 34258401 PMCID: PMC8254191 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Treatment adaptation based on tumour biomarker response during radiotherapy of prostate cancer, could be used for both escalation and de-escalation of radiation doses and volumes. To execute an adaptation involving extension of treatment volumes during radiation can however be restricted by the doses already delivered. The aim of this work was to develop a treatment planning method that addresses this challenge. Material and methods A volumetric-modulated-arc-therapy (VMAT) planning method with sequential plan-on-plan optimization was developed for a prospective phase II trial including 100 patients on salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer recurrence. A treatment adaptation was performed after five weeks of SRT based on prostate-specific antigen response during this phase of the treatment. This involved extension of treatment volumes for non-responders (n = 64) to include pelvic lymph nodes and boost to 68Gallium-Prostate-Specific-Membrane-Antigen-Positron-Emission-Tomography positive lesions. This method was evolved by introducing an EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2.0 Gy fractions) correction of the base plan for improved dose coverage. Results All dose-volume criteria for target coverage were met for the non-responders when based on physical dose. An EQD2 correction of the base plan for non-responders, implemented for the final 29 patients, led to a statistically significant improvement in dose coverage as compared to the 35 patients treated without EQD2 correction. Conclusions This is to our knowledge the only study presented on biomarker-guided sequential VMAT radiotherapy using a plan-on-plan technique in the pelvis. By using a biologically adapted technique an improved target coverage was achieved without compromising doses to organs at risk.
Collapse
|
37
|
Keegan NM, Bodei L, Morris MJ. Seek and Find: Current Prospective Evidence for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Imaging to Detect Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7:267-278. [PMID: 33744163 PMCID: PMC8371443 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Men with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer face a clinical conundrum. Depending on the detected distribution of disease, treatment goals may range from cure with focal therapy to palliative with systemic therapy to expectant observation. Retrospective studies of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging demonstrate higher disease detection rates than conventional imaging. OBJECTIVE This review focuses on available prospective evidence for diagnostic use of PSMA-based imaging to accurately restage recurrent prostate cancer and explores the potential clinical impact, near future uses, and challenges for PSMA-based imaging in this setting. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for prospective studies with primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoints evaluating PSMA-based imaging for patients with recurrent prostate cancer published in English in the past 10 yrs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We reviewed 48 prospective studies evaluating the role of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) in recurrent prostate cancer. These studies establish the diagnostic accuracy and safety of PSMA PET using the 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL radiotracers even at lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (0.5 ≤ PSA < 1.0 ng/m: disease detection rate 51-78%). The use of PSMA PET has been shown to result in changes in management in up to two-thirds of patients. CONCLUSIONS There is now higher-level regulatory-quality prospective evidence for PSMA-based imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer. There is prospective evidence of superiority over cross-sectional imaging and bone scintigraphy, as well as for the alterations in disease management as a result of PSMA-based imaging. PATIENT SUMMARY When the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is rising after primary therapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is excellent at detecting and localizing prostate cancer, even at low PSA levels. Those who benefit best from treatment modifications based on PSMA PET findings are yet to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh M Keegan
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vatsa R, Kumar R, Shukla J, Rana N, Vadi SK, Lal A, Singh SK, Mittal BR. F-18 fluorocholine positron emission tomography- computed tomography in initial staging and recurrence evaluation of prostate carcinoma: A prospective comparative study with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body skeletal scintigraphy. World J Nucl Med 2021; 20:156-163. [PMID: 34321968 PMCID: PMC8286002 DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.wjnm_46_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the major causes of death due to cancer in men. Conventional imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide locoregional status, but fall short in identifying distant metastasis. C-11 choline F-18 fluorocholine (F-18 FCH) has been shown to be useful in imaging of PCa. The present prospective study evaluates and compares the role of F-18 FCH positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with locoregional MRI and whole-body bone scintigraphy in PCa patients for initial staging and recurrence evaluation. This study included a total of 50 patients. Tc-99m skeletal scintigraphy, F-18 FCH PET-CT, and diffusion-weighted MRI of the pelvic region were performed within a span of 2-3 weeks of each other, in random order. For the primary site, core biopsy findings of the lesion were considered as gold standard. The kappa test was used to measure agreement between bone scintigraphy, F-18 FCH, and MRI. For comparing Tc-99m bone scintigraphy, F-18 FCH, and MRI, McNemar's test was applied. F-18 FCH PET-CT and MRI were able to detect primary lesion in all initial staging patients. The sensitivity and specificity of F-18 FCH PET-CT versus MRI were found to be 92.8% versus 89.2% and 100 versus 80%, respectively, for the recurrence at the primary site. A total of 55 bony lesions at distant sites were detected on F-18 FCH PET-CT in comparison to 43 bone lesions on whole-body bone scintigraphy. F-18 FCH PET/CT also detected additional lung lesions in 2 patients and abdominal lymph nodes in 12 patients. F-18 FCH PET-CT could detect primary lesions, local metastasis, bone metastasis, and distant metastasis in a single study and is also a useful modality in recurrence evaluation in PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhee Vatsa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rohit Kumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jaya Shukla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Nivedita Rana
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shelvin Kumar Vadi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anupam Lal
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shrawan Kumar Singh
- Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Bhagwant Rai Mittal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Young S, Liu W, Zukotynski K, Bauman G. Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer: a clinician's guide. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:641-655. [PMID: 33476253 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1878883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION PSMA-targeted PET/CT is a 'Next Generation Imaging' technique with superior sensitivity and specificity for detecting recurrent prostate cancer compared with conventional imaging, allowing more accurate staging and re-staging. AREAS COVERED This article reviews the role of PSMA-targeted PET/CT in clinical management of men with recurrent prostate cancer. EXPERT OPINION Through enhanced spatial characterization of recurrent prostate cancer, PSMA-targeted PET/CT has shown significant impact on management decisions. In particular, by identifying men with recurrence confined to the prostate or pelvic nodes, PSMA-targeted PET/CT enables selective deployment of localized salvage therapies for management of biochemical failure after primary treatment with prostatectomy or radiotherapy. In oligometastatic disease, PSMA-targeted PET/CT may improve patient selection and treatment accuracy for metastasis-directed therapy and early phase II studies show encouraging results in delaying the need for systemic therapy. Further, quantitative PSMA-targeted PET/CT for monitoring response and therapeutic PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals are emerging as encouraging treatment options in the setting of castrate-resistant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sympascho Young
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Alberts IL, Seide SE, Mingels C, Bohn KP, Shi K, Zacho HD, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A. Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2978-2989. [PMID: 33550425 PMCID: PMC8263438 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05210-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Many radiotracers are currently available for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), yet many have not been compared head-to-head in comparative imaging studies. There is therefore an unmet need for evidence synthesis to guide evidence-based decisions in the selection of radiotracers. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the detection rate of various radiotracers for the rPC. Methods The PUBMED, EMBASE, and the EU and NIH trials databases were searched without date or language restriction for comparative imaging tracers for 13 radiotracers of principal interest. Key search terms included 18F-PSMA-1007, 18F-DCPFyl, 68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-PSMA-11, 68Ga-PSMA-I&T, 68Ga-THP-PSMA, 64Cu-PSMA-617, 18F-JK-PSMA-7, 18F-Fluciclovine, 18F-FABC, 18F-Choline, 11C-Choline, and 68Ga-RM2. Studies reporting comparative imaging data in humans in rPC were selected. Single armed studies and matched pair analyses were excluded. Twelve studies with eight radiotracers were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers screened all studies (using the PRISMA-NMA statement) for inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (using the QUADAS-2 tool). A network meta-analysis was performed using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis to obtain estimated detection rate odds ratios for each tracer combination. Results A majority of studies were judged to be at risk of publication bias. With the exception of 18F-PSMA-1007, little difference in terms of detection rate was revealed between the three most commonly used PSMA-radiotracers (68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-PSMA-1007, 18F-DCFPyl), which in turn showed clear superiority to choline and fluciclovine using the derived network. Conclusion Differences in patient-level detection rates were observed between PSMA- and choline-radiotracers. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to favour one of the four routinely used PSMA-radioligands (PSMA-11, PSMA-1007, PSMA-I&T, and DCFPyl) over another owing to the limited evidence base and risk of publication bias revealed by our systematic review. A further limitation was lack of reporting on diagnostic accuracy, which might favour radiotracers with low specificity in an analysis restricted only to detection rate. The NMA derived can be used to inform the design of future clinical trials and highlight areas where current evidence is weak. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05210-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Leigh Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine. Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Street: Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Svenja Elizabeth Seide
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Mingels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine. Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Street: Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Karl Peter Bohn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine. Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Street: Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kuangyu Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine. Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Street: Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine. Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Street: Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine. Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Street: Freiburgstr. 18, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ferrari M, Renard J, Pereira Mestre R, Bosetti DG, Stoffel F, Treglia G. Change of management by using hybrid imaging with radiolabelled choline in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Clin Transl Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-020-00407-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
42
|
Morawitz J, Kirchner J, Lakes J, Bruckmann NM, Mamlins E, Hiester A, Aissa J, Loberg C, Schimmöller L, Arsov C, Antke C, Albers P, Antoch G, Sawicki LM. PSMA PET/CT vs. CT alone in newly diagnosed biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: Comparison of detection rates and therapeutic implications. Eur J Radiol 2021; 136:109556. [PMID: 33485127 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and computed tomography (CT) alone for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) and effect on treatment. METHODS This retrospective study included 59 patients with recently recorded biochemical recurrence of PCa (mean PSA 1.96 ± 1.64 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy. Patients received PET/CT with either 68Ga-PSMA-11 (n = 36) or 18F-PSMA-1007 (n = 23). PET/CT and CT images were evaluated separately in regard to PCa lesion count, type, and localisation by two physicians. Histopathology, follow-up imaging and PSA levels after salvage irradiation served as reference standard. A McNemar test was used to compare detection rates. Changes in therapeutic approaches based on staging differences between CT alone and PET/CT were assessed in a virtual multidisciplinary tumour board. RESULTS There were 142 lesions in 50 of 59 patients. PSMA PET/CT detected 141 lesions (99.3 %) in 50 patients (84.7 %), while CT detected 72 lesions (50.7 %) in 29 patients (49.2 %). A significantly higher detection rate of PSMA PET/CT was observed on a lesion-based analysis (p < 0.0001) and on a patient based analysis (p < 0.0001). Herein, both 68Ga- and 18F-PSMA PET/CT performed significantly better than CT alone (p < 0.0001, respectively). In 9 patients (15.3 %) no relapse was detectable by either modality. All lesions detected by CT were also detected by PSMA PET/CT. In 38 patients PSMA PET/CT detected more lesions than CT alone, altering the treatment approach in 22 of these patients. CONCLUSION PSMA PET/CT is superior to CT alone in detecting biochemical recurrence in PCa patients after radical prostatectomy and offered additional therapeutic options in a substantial number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Morawitz
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - J Kirchner
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - J Lakes
- Department of Urology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - N M Bruckmann
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - E Mamlins
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - A Hiester
- Department of Urology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - J Aissa
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - C Loberg
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - L Schimmöller
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - C Arsov
- Department of Urology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - C Antke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - P Albers
- Department of Urology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - G Antoch
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - L M Sawicki
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chevalme YM, Boudali L, Gauthé M, Rousseau C, Skanjeti A, Merlin C, Robin P, Giraudet AL, Janier M, Talbot JN. Survey by the French Medicine Agency (ANSM) of the imaging protocol, detection rate, and safety of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer in case of negative or equivocal 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT: 1084 examinations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2935-2950. [PMID: 33416958 PMCID: PMC8263442 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05086-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Despite growing evidence of a superior diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 over 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT, the number of PET/CT centres able to label on site with gallium-68 is still currently limited. Therefore, patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer frequently undergo FCH as the 1st-line PET/CT. Actually, the positivity rate (PR) of a second-line PSMA-11 PET/CT in case of negative FCH PET/CT has only been reported in few short series, in a total of 185 patients. Our aims were to check (1) whether the excellent PR reported with PSMA-11 is also obtained in BCR patients whose recent FCH PET/CT was negative or equivocal; (2) in which biochemical and clinical context a high PSMA-11 PET/CT PR may be expected in those patients, in particular revealing an oligometastatic pattern; (3) whether among the various imaging protocols for PSMA-11 PET/CT used in France, one yields a significantly highest PR; (4) the tolerance of PSMA-11. Patients and methods Six centres performed 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CTs during the first 3 years of its use in France. Prior to each PET/CT, the patient’s data were submitted prospectively for authorisation to ANSM, the French Medicine Agency. The on-site readings of 1084 PSMA-11 PET/CTs in BCR patients whose recent FCH PET/CTs resulted negative or equivocal were pooled and analysed. Results (1) The overall PR was 68%; for a median serum PSA level (sPSA) of 1.7 ng/mL, an oligometastatic pattern (1–3 foci) was observed in 31% of the cases overall; (2) PR was significantly related to sPSA (from 41% if < 0.2 ng/mL to 81% if ≥ 2 ng/mL), to patients’ age, to initial therapy (64% if prostatectomy vs. 85% without prostatectomy due to frequent foci in the prostate fossa), to whether FCH PET/CT was negative or equivocal (PR = 62% vs. 82%), and to previous BCR (PR = 63% for 1st BCR vs. 72% in case of previous BCR); (3) no significant difference in PR was found according to the imaging protocol: injected activity, administration of a contrast agent and/or of furosemide, dose length product, one single or multiple time points of image acquisition; (4) no adverse event was reported after PSMA-11 injection, even associated with a contrast agent and/or furosemide. Conclusion Compared with the performance of PSMA-11 PET/CT in BCR reported independently of FCH PET/CT in 6 large published series (n > 200), the selection based on FCH PET/CT resulted in no difference of PSMA-11 PR for sPSA < 1 ng/mL but in a slightly lower PR for sPSA ≥ 1 ng/mL, probably because FCH performs rather well at this sPSA and very occult BCR was over-represented in our cohort. An oligometastatic pattern paving the way to targeted therapy was observed in one fourth to one third of the cases, according to the clinico-biochemical context of the BCR. Systematic dual or triple acquisition time points or administration of a contrast agent and/or furosemide did not bring a significant added value for PSMA-11 PET/CT positivity and should be decided on individual bases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanna-Marina Chevalme
- Direction des médicaments en oncologie, hématologie, transplantation, néphrologie, thérapie cellulaire, produits sanguins, et radiopharmaceutiques, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), 143 Bd Anatole, F93200, St Denis, France.
| | - Lotfi Boudali
- Direction des médicaments en oncologie, hématologie, transplantation, néphrologie, thérapie cellulaire, produits sanguins, et radiopharmaceutiques, Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), 143 Bd Anatole, F93200, St Denis, France
| | - Mathieu Gauthé
- Service de médecine nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Rousseau
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ICO René Gauducheau, CNRS, Inserm, CRCINA, Nantes University, F-44000, Nantes, France
| | - Andrea Skanjeti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EA 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Charles Merlin
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Cancer Center Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Philippe Robin
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, EA 3878 (GETBO), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France
| | | | - Marc Janier
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, EA 3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.,Comité permanent de l'ANSM, Médicaments de diagnostic et de médecine nucléaire, St Denis, France
| | - Jean-Noël Talbot
- Service de médecine nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Comité permanent de l'ANSM, Médicaments de diagnostic et de médecine nucléaire, St Denis, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Slevin F, Beasley M, Cross W, Scarsbrook A, Murray L, Henry A. Patterns of Lymph Node Failure in Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer Postradical Prostatectomy and Implications for Salvage Therapies. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1126-1140. [PMID: 33305073 PMCID: PMC7718540 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing use of radical prostatectomy to treat patients with high-risk prostate cancer. This has contributed toward a pathologic stage migration, and a greater number of patients are subsequently being diagnosed with biochemical failure. There is increasing use of advanced imaging techniques in the setting of biochemical failure, including positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This critical literature review highlights the evidence for PET-CT in postprostatectomy biochemical failure and identifies sites of pelvic lymph node relapse in the setting of biochemical failure and the potential implications that the locations of these relapses may have for salvage therapies. Potential future directions are then considered. RESULTS The optimal PET-CT tracer remains uncertain but there is increasing use of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT for investigating sites of nodal metastasis at low prostate-specific antigen levels, and this is leading to a blurring of the biochemical and radiologic recurrence phases. The optimal therapeutic approach remains undefined, with current trials investigating postoperative radiation therapy to the whole pelvis in addition to the prostatic fossa, the use of PET-CT in the setting of biochemical recurrence to guide delivery of salvage radiation therapy, and, for patients with node-only relapsed prostate cancer, the addition of whole pelvis radiation therapy to metastasis-directed therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The most appropriate target volume for salvage radiation therapy remains uncertain, and the findings of studies using PET-CT to map nodal recurrences suggest that there could be a role for extending whole pelvis radiation therapy volumes to increase coverage of superior nodal regions. The emerging fields of radiomics and radiogenomics could provide important prognostic information and aid decision making for patients with relapsed prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Beasley
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - William Cross
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l’AFU – actualisation 2020–2022 : cancer de la prostate. Prog Urol 2020; 30:S136-S251. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30752-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
46
|
Clinical impact of PET imaging in prostate cancer management. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30:649-653. [PMID: 32732622 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Imaging of prostate cancer has been a rapidly evolving field in recent years with the introduction of multiple new PET tracer agents. Introduction of novel imaging techniques into clinical practice requires careful evaluation, with the ultimate aims of improved patient outcomes, better sequencing of treatments, and cost effectiveness. The increased sensitivity and specificity of these new PET agents present both challenges and opportunities. We know they frequently change management, but are these effective management changes, and is it always in the best interests of the patients? RECENT FINDINGS This review will focus on recent publications that provide high-level evidence for the use of PET in prostate cancer. It will discuss studies that have evaluated the clinical impact of PET imaging in prostate cancer and will review a number of trials that demonstrate the potential of PET to change current standard of care, from diagnosis, to prognostic capabilities in men with metastatic prostate cancer. SUMMARY Evidence for the use of PET in prostate cancer is building with studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy of PET at all stages of prostate cancer. We review the evidence available, focusing on prospective trials that are measuring the impact of new technology on patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
47
|
Emmett L. Changing the Goal Posts: Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Targeted Theranostics in Prostate Cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2020; 36:151052. [PMID: 32674976 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) theranostics is changing the face of prostate cancer diagnosis and therapy. PSMA, a transmembrane protein over-expressed in many prostate cancers, is a promising target for theranostics. Theranostics is the concept of small molecule proteins that are labelled to different radionuclides and can be used for either diagnosis or therapy, dependent on whether they are labelled with an imaging or therapy radionuclide. By directly targeting the cancer cells with imaging and then for therapy, this approach embodies the philosophy of precision medicine - right drug, right time, right dose. The question is how to best utilise these new imaging and therapy agents in clinical practice. This review will evaluate the importance of PSMA in prostate cancer, its role in diagnostic imaging, and its potential as a therapy of advanced prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, professional websites were searched. CONCLUSION PSMA-directed theranostics has an expanding role in prostate cancer because of its utility as a sensitive diagnostic tool that can be coupled with efficacious and low-toxicity therapeutic options. Ongoing research is required to determine how to use this effective tool for best patient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE PSMA theranostics is rapidly being incorporated into the routine care of men with prostate cancer. Understanding its strengths, its limitations, and where it may be valuable in clinical care is important in undertaking best patient practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Value of the 18F-choline PET/MR hybrid technique on the therapeutic approach in patients with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy and elevation of prostate specific antigen levels less than 1 ng/ml. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
49
|
Joshi A, Roberts MJ, Perera M, Williams E, Rhee H, Pryor D, Lehman M, Heathcote P, Wood S, Coucher J, Gustafson S, Miles K, Vela I. The clinical efficacy of PSMA PET/MRI in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer compared with standard of care imaging modalities and confirmatory histopathology: results of a single-centre, prospective clinical trial. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020; 37:551-560. [PMID: 32519046 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10043-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Prospective evidence for the clinical role and efficacy of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combining MRI characterization and localization of lesions with PET avidity in comparison to conventional imaging is limited. In a prospective clinical trial, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of PSMA PET/MRI in men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following curative therapy. A single-centre, prospective clinical trial at the Princess Alexandra Hospital recruited 30 patients with BCR. Patients underwent PSMA PET/MRI and concurrent conventional CT chest, abdomen, pelvis and whole-body bone scan. Biopsy was performed when safety possible for histological correlation of identified lesions. Clinical efficacy and impact of PSMA PET findings were evaluated. 30 patients with BCR were recruited (median PSA 0.69 ng/ml). PSMA avid lesions were present in 21 patients (70%). 23 patients were previously treated with definitive surgery, 6 patients received external beam radiotherapy and 1 patient had low dose rate brachytherapy. A total of 8 of 9 lesions biopsied were positive (88.9% histological correlation). PSMA PET/MRI detected local recurrence (p = 0.005) and pelvic lesions (p = 0.06) more accurately than conventional imaging. PSMA PET/MRI may be useful in staging men with biochemical recurrence, especially when PSA is low. Our data demonstrates a high detection rate, especially for locally recurrent disease, and highlights the role of this modality when PSA is low. This modality has the potential to significantly improve prostate cancer detection and may have implications for earlier salvage treatment, avoidance of futile local therapy and change patient management to lead to improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Joshi
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - Queensland, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M Perera
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - E Williams
- Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - Queensland, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - H Rhee
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - Queensland, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - D Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M Lehman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - P Heathcote
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - S Wood
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - Queensland, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - J Coucher
- Department of Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - S Gustafson
- Department of Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - K Miles
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - I Vela
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. .,Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - Queensland, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. .,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Weber M, Kurek C, Barbato F, Eiber M, Maurer T, Nader M, Hadaschik B, Grünwald V, Herrmann K, Wetter A, Fendler WP. PSMA-Ligand PET for Early Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. J Nucl Med 2020; 62:88-91. [PMID: 32444377 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.245456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The low detection rate of conventional imaging and unspecific fluctuations in prostate-specific antigen can hamper early diagnosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We thus assessed the value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in the detection of early CRPC (prostate-specific antigen ≤ 3 ng/mL). Methods: We identified 55 patients with early CRPC from our institutional database. PSMA PET/CT and its CT component were interpreted independently by 3 masked readers. The primary endpoint was the per-patient detection rate; secondary endpoints were interobserver agreement and predictors of PET positivity. Results: PSMA PET/CT was positive in 41 of 55 (75%) patients. Sixteen of 55 (29%) patients had local disease only, and 25 of 55 (45%) had M1 disease. Overall, PSMA PET/CT interobserver agreement was substantial by Landis and Koch criteria (Fleiss κ = 0.77). Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT localized prostate cancer lesions in 75% of patients and M1 disease in 45%. Detection of early CRPC facilitates disease-delaying therapies for local or oligometastatic disease. PSMA PET/CT is of value in early CRPC and should be included in the CRPC entry criteria of the European Association of Urology and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claudia Kurek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Barbato
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology and Martini-Klinik, University of Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Nader
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Interdisciplinary Genitourinary Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Axel Wetter
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|