Summary of the First ISMRM-SNMMI Workshop on PET/MRI: Applications and Limitations

Comparison of quantitative [11C]PE2I brain PET studies between an integrated PET/MR and a stand-alone PET system

PET/MR systems demanded great efforts for accurate attenuation correction (AC) but differences in technology, geometry and hardware attenuation may also affect quantitative results. Dedicated PET systems using transmission-based AC are regarded as the gold standard for quantitative brain PET. The study aim was to investigate the agreement between quantitative PET outcomes from a PET/MR scanner against a stand-alone PET system. Nine patients with Parkinsonism underwent two 80-min dynamic PET scans with the dopamine transporter ligand [11C]PE2I. Images were reconstructed with resolution-matched settings using 68Ge-transmission (stand-alone PET), and zero-echo-time MR (PET/MR) scans for AC. Non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) and relative delivery (R1) were evaluated using volumes of interest and voxel-wise analysis. Correlations between systems were high (r ≥ 0.85) for both quantitative outcome parameters in all brain regions. Striatal BPND was significantly lower on PET/MR than on stand-alone PET (-7%). R1 was significantly overestimated in posterior cortical regions (9%) and underestimated in striatal (-9%) and limbic areas (-6%). The voxel-wise evaluation revealed that the MR-safe headphones caused a negative bias in both parametric BPND and R1 images. Additionally, a significant positive bias of R1 was found in the auditory cortex, most likely due to the acoustic background noise during MR imaging. The relative bias of the quantitative [11C]PE2I PET data acquired from a SIGNA PET/MR system was in the same order as the expected test-retest reproducibility of [11C]PE2I BPND and R1, compared to a stand-alone ECAT PET scanner. MR headphones and background noise are potential sources of error in functional PET/MR studies.

Deep learning-enabled quantification of simultaneous PET/MRI for cell transplantation monitoring

Current methods of in vivo imaging islet cell transplants for diabetes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are limited by their low sensitivity. Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI has greater sensitivity and ability to visualize cell metabolism. However, this dual-modality tool currently faces two major challenges for monitoring cells. Primarily, the dynamic conditions of PET such as signal decay and spatiotemporal change in radioactivity prevent accurate quantification of the transplanted cell number. In addition, selection bias from different radiologists renders human error in segmentation. This calls for the development of artificial intelligence algorithms for the automated analysis of PET/MRI of cell transplantations. Here, we combined K-means++ for segmentation with a convolutional neural network to predict radioactivity in cell-transplanted mouse models. This study provides a tool combining machine learning with a deep learning algorithm for monitoring islet cell transplantation through PET/MRI. It also unlocks a dynamic approach to automated segmentation and quantification of radioactivity in PET/MRI.

Synthetic PET via Domain Translation of 3-D MRI

Historically, patient datasets have been used to develop and validate various reconstruction algorithms for PET/MRI and PET/CT. To enable such algorithm development, without the need for acquiring hundreds of patient exams, in this article we demonstrate a deep learning technique to generate synthetic but realistic whole-body PET sinograms from abundantly available whole-body MRI. Specifically, we use a dataset of 56 18F-FDG-PET/MRI exams to train a 3-D residual UNet to predict physiologic PET uptake from whole-body T1-weighted MRI. In training, we implemented a balanced loss function to generate realistic uptake across a large dynamic range and computed losses along tomographic lines of response to mimic the PET acquisition. The predicted PET images are forward projected to produce synthetic PET (sPET) time-of-flight (ToF) sinograms that can be used with vendor-provided PET reconstruction algorithms, including using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) and MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC). The resulting synthetic data recapitulates physiologic 18F-FDG uptake, e.g., high uptake localized to the brain and bladder, as well as uptake in liver, kidneys, heart, and muscle. To simulate abnormalities with high uptake, we also insert synthetic lesions. We demonstrate that this sPET data can be used interchangeably with real PET data for the PET quantification task of comparing CTAC and MRAC methods, achieving ≤ 7.6% error in mean-SUV compared to using real data. These results together show that the proposed sPET data pipeline can be reasonably used for development, evaluation, and validation of PET/MRI reconstruction methods.

Brain imaging of sequential acquisition using a flexible PET scanner and 3-T MRI: quantitative and qualitative assessment

OBJECTIVE

A mobile PET scanner termed flexible PET (fxPET) has been designed to fit existing MRI systems. The purpose of this study was to assess brain imaging with fxPET combined with 3-T MRI in comparison with conventional PET (cPET)/CT.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 29 subjects with no visible lesions except for mild leukoaraiosis on whole brain imaging underwent 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) cPET/CT followed by fxPET and MRI. The registration differences between fxPET and MRI and between cPET and CT were compared by measuring spatial coordinates. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) was acquired. We applied two methods of attenuation correction to the fxPET images: MR-based attenuation correction, which yielded fxPET_MRAC; and CT-based attenuation correction, which yielded fxPET_CTAC. The three PET datasets were co-registered to the T1WI. Following subcortical segmentation and cortical parcellation, volumes of interest were placed in each PET image to assess physiological accumulation in the brain. SUV_mean was obtained and compared between the three datasets. We also visually evaluated image distortion and clarity of fxPET_MRAC.

RESULTS

Mean misregistration of fxPET/MRI was < 3 mm for each margin. Mean registration differences were significantly larger for fxPET/MRI than for cPET/CT except for the superior margin. There were high correlations between the three PET datasets regarding SUV_mean. On visual evaluation of image quality, the grade of distortion was comparable between fxPET_MRAC and cPET, and the grade of clarity was acceptable but inferior for fxPET_MRAC compared with cPET.

CONCLUSIONS

fxPET could successfully determine physiological [¹⁸F]FDG uptake; however, improved image clarity is desirable. In this study, fxPET/MRI at 3-T was feasible for brain imaging.

Update on the Use of PET/MRI Contrast Agents and Tracers in Brain Oncology: A Systematic Review

The recent advancements in hybrid positron emission tomography–magnetic resonance imaging systems (PET/MRI) have brought massive value in the investigation of disease processes, in the development of novel treatments, in the monitoring of both therapy response and disease progression, and, not least, in the introduction of new multidisciplinary molecular imaging approaches. While offering potential advantages over PET/CT, the hybrid PET/MRI proved to improve both the image quality and lesion detectability. In particular, it showed to be an effective tool for the study of metabolic information about lesions and pathological conditions affecting the brain, from a better tumor characterization to the analysis of metabolic brain networks. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, this work presents a systematic review on PET/MRI in basic research and clinical differential diagnosis on brain oncology and neurodegenerative disorders. The analysis includes literature works and clinical case studies, with a specific focus on the use of PET tracers and MRI contrast agents, which are usually employed to perform hybrid PET/MRI studies of brain tumors. A systematic literature search for original diagnostic studies is performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science. Patients, study, and imaging characteristics were extracted from the selected articles. The analysis included acquired data pooling, heterogeneity testing, sensitivity analyses, used tracers, and reported patient outcomes. Our analysis shows that, while PET/MRI for the brain is a promising diagnostic method for early diagnosis, staging and recurrence in patients with brain diseases, a better definition of the role of tracers and imaging agents in both clinical and preclinical hybrid PET/MRI applications is needed and further efforts should be devoted to the standardization of the contrast imaging protocols, also considering the emerging agents and multimodal probes.

Cutting-Edge Imaging of Cardiac Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors: Lesson from a Case Series

With the increasing availability of high-performance medical imaging for the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), a progressive growth of asymptomatic and incidentally detected cardiac metastases (CMs) has been observed in the recent years. In clinical practice, CMs of NENs are often incidentally detected by whole-body 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs or 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and afterwards accurately characterized by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and/or gated cardiac computed tomography when CMR is contraindicated or not available. The interpreting physician should familiarize with the main imaging features of CM, a finding that may be encountered in NETs patients more than previously thought. Herein, we present a case series of four patients with CMs from small-intestine NETs highlighting strengths and weaknesses of a multimodality imaging approach in clinical practice.

Investigating Simultaneity for Deep Learning-Enhanced Actual Ultra-Low-Dose Amyloid PET/MR Imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diagnostic-quality amyloid PET images can be created with deep learning using actual ultra-low-dose PET images and simultaneous structural MR imaging. Here, we investigated whether simultaneity is required; if not, MR imaging-assisted ultra-low-dose PET imaging could be performed with separate PET/CT and MR imaging acquisitions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited 48 participants: Thirty-two (20 women; mean, 67.7 [SD, 7.9] years) were used for pretraining; 328 (SD, 32) MBq of [¹⁸F] florbetaben was injected. Sixteen participants (6 women; mean, 71.4 [SD. 8.7] years of age) were scanned in 2 sessions, with 6.5 (SD, 3.8) and 300 (SD, 14) MBq of [¹⁸F] florbetaben injected, respectively. Structural MR imaging was acquired simultaneously with PET (90-110 minutes postinjection) on integrated PET/MR imaging in 2 sessions. Multiple U-Net-based deep networks were trained to create diagnostic PET images. For each method, training was done with the ultra-low-dose PET as input combined with MR imaging from either the ultra-low-dose session (simultaneous) or from the standard-dose PET session (nonsimultaneous). Image quality of the enhanced and ultra-low-dose PET images was evaluated using quantitative signal-processing methods, standardized uptake value ratio correlation, and clinical reads.

RESULTS

Qualitatively, the enhanced images resembled the standard-dose image for both simultaneous and nonsimultaneous conditions. Three quantitative metrics showed significant improvement for all networks and no differences due to simultaneity. Standardized uptake value ratio correlation was high across different image types and network training methods, and 31/32 enhanced image pairs were read similarly.

CONCLUSIONS

This work suggests that accurate amyloid PET images can be generated using enhanced ultra-low-dose PET and either nonsimultaneous or simultaneous MR imaging, broadening the utility of ultra-low-dose amyloid PET imaging.

PET/MR Technology: Advancement and Challenges

When this article was written, it coincided with the 11th anniversary of the installation of our PET/MR device in Munich. In fact, this was the first fully integrated device to be in clinical use. During this time, we have observed many interesting behaviors, to put it kindly. However, it is more critical that in this process, our understanding of the system also improved - including the advantages and limitations from a technical, logistical, and medical perspective. The last decade of PET/MRI research has certainly been characterized by most sites looking for a "key application." There were many ideas in this context and before and after the devices became available, some of which were based on the earlier work with integrating data from single devices. These involved validating classical PET methods with MRI (eg, perfusion or oncology diagnostics). More important, however, were the scenarios where intermodal synergies could be expected. In this review, we look back on this decade-long journey, at the challenges overcome and those still to come.

PET/MR Part 4: Clinical Applications of PET/MRI

Position emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a hybrid modality provides novel imaging opportunities. While there are a very broad array of pathologies that could benefit from PET/MRI, there is only a narrow range of applications where benefit over standard care justifies the higher resource utilization and, in particular, offers a net positive trade-off over PET/CT. This benefit is generally associated with the omission of CT and the associated radiation dose from the patient workup. This manuscript provides a summary of the generally accepted clinical applications of PET/MRI in both adult and pediatric populations. While there are a number of potential applications and certainly exciting research that may expand applications in the future, the purpose of this paper was to focus on current, mainstream applications. This is the final manuscript in a four-part integrated series sponsored by the SNMMI-TS PET/MR Task Force in conjunction with the SNMMI-TS Publication Committee.

Evaluation of attenuation correction in PET/MRI with synthetic lesion insertion

Purpose: One major challenge facing simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is PET attenuation correction (AC) measurement and evaluation of its accuracy. There is a crucial need for the evaluation of current and emergent PET AC methodologies in terms of absolute quantitative accuracy in the reconstructed PET images. Approach: To address this need, we developed and evaluated a lesion insertion tool for PET/MRI that will facilitate this evaluation process. This tool was developed for the Biograph mMR and evaluated using phantom and patient data. Contrast recovery coefficients (CRC) from the NEMA IEC phantom of synthesized lesions were compared to measurements. In addition, SUV biases of lesions inserted in human brain and pelvis images were assessed from PET images reconstructed with MRI-based AC (MRAC) and CT-based AC (CTAC). Results: For cross-comparison PET/MRI scanners AC evaluation, we demonstrated that the developed lesion insertion tool can be harmonized with the GE-SIGNA lesion insertion tool. About < 3 % CRC curves difference between simulation and measurement was achieved. An average of 1.6% between harmonized simulated CRC curves obtained with mMR and SIGNA lesion insertion tools was achieved. A range of - 5 % to 12% MRAC to CTAC SUV bias was respectively achieved in the vicinity and inside bone tissues in patient images in two anatomical regions, the brain, and pelvis. Conclusions: A lesion insertion tool was developed for the Biograph mMR PET/MRI scanner and harmonized with the SIGNA PET/MRI lesion insertion tool. These tools will allow for an accurate evaluation of different PET/MRI AC approaches and permit exploration of subtle attenuation correction differences across systems.

Clinical Applications of PET/MR Imaging

PET/MR imaging is in routine clinical use and is at least as effective as PET/CT for oncologic and neurologic studies with advantages with certain PET radiopharmaceuticals and applications. In addition, whole body PET/MR imaging substantially reduces radiation dosages compared with PET/CT which is particularly relevant to pediatric and young adult population. For cancer imaging, assessment of hepatic, pelvic, and soft-tissue malignancies may benefit from PET/MR imaging. For neurologic imaging, volumetric brain MR imaging can detect regional volume loss relevant to cognitive impairment and epilepsy. In addition, the single-bed position acquisition enables dynamic brain PET imaging without extending the total study length which has the potential to enhance the diagnostic information from PET.

A decade of multi-modality PET and MR imaging in abdominal oncology

OBJECTIVES

To investigate trends observed in a decade of published research on multimodality PET(/CT)+MR imaging in abdominal oncology, and to explore how these trends are reflected by the use of multimodality imaging performed at our institution.

METHODS

First, we performed a literature search (2009-2018) including all papers published on the multimodality combination of PET(/CT) and MRI in abdominal oncology. Retrieved papers were categorized according to a structured labelling system, including study design and outcome, cancer and lesion type under investigation and PET-tracer type. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and evolutions over time were plotted graphically. Second, we performed a descriptive analysis of the numbers of MRI, PET/CT and multimodality PET/CT+MRI combinations (performed within a ≤14 days interval) performed during a similar time span at our institution.

RESULTS

Published research papers involving multimodality PET(/CT)+MRI combinations showed an impressive increase in numbers, both for retrospective combinations of PET/CT and MRI, as well as hybrid PET/MRI. Main areas of research included new PET-tracers, visual PET(/CT)+MRI assessment for staging, and (semi-)quantitative analysis of PET-parameters compared to or combined with MRI-parameters as predictive biomarkers. In line with literature, we also observed a vast increase in numbers of multimodality PET/CT+MRI imaging in our institutional data.

CONCLUSIONS

The tremendous increase in published literature on multimodality imaging, reflected by our institutional data, shows the continuously growing interest in comprehensive multivariable imaging evaluations to guide oncological practice.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The role of multimodality imaging in oncology is rapidly evolving. This paper summarizes the main applications and recent developments in multimodality imaging, with a specific focus on the combination of PET+MRI in abdominal oncology.

Fast dynamic brain PET imaging using stochastic variational prediction for recurrent frame generation

Purpose

We assess the performance of a recurrent frame generation algorithm for prediction of late frames from initial frames in dynamic brain PET imaging.

Methods

Clinical dynamic ¹⁸F‐DOPA brain PET/CT studies of 46 subjects with ten folds cross‐validation were retrospectively employed. A novel stochastic adversarial video prediction model was implemented to predict the last 13 frames (25–90 minutes) from the initial 13 frames (0–25 minutes). The quantitative analysis of the predicted dynamic PET frames was performed for the test and validation dataset using established metrics.

Results

The predicted dynamic images demonstrated that the model is capable of predicting the trend of change in time‐varying tracer biodistribution. The Bland‐Altman plots reported the lowest tracer uptake bias (−0.04) for the putamen region and the smallest variance (95% CI: −0.38, +0.14) for the cerebellum. The region‐wise Patlak graphical analysis in the caudate and putamen regions for eight subjects from the test and validation dataset showed that the average bias for Ki and distribution volume was 4.3%, 5.1% and 4.4%, 4.2%, (P‐value <0.05), respectively.

Conclusion

We have developed a novel deep learning approach for fast dynamic brain PET imaging capable of generating the last 65 minutes time frames from the initial 25 minutes frames, thus enabling significant reduction in scanning time.

Evaluation of SUVlean consistency in FDG and PSMA PET/MR with Dixon-, James-, and Janma-based lean body mass correction

PURPOSE

To systematically evaluate the consistency of various standardized uptake value (SUV) lean body mass (LBM) normalization methods in a clinical positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) setting.

METHODS

SUV of brain, liver, prostate, parotid, blood, and muscle were measured in 90 18F-FDG and 28 18F-PSMA PET/MR scans and corrected for LBM using the James, Janma (short for Janmahasatian), and Dixon approaches. The prospective study was performed from December 2018 to August 2020 at Shanghai East Hospital. Forty dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of non-fat mass were used as the reference standard. Agreement between different LBM methods was assessed by linear regression and Bland-Altman statistics. SUV's dependency on BMI was evaluated by means of linear regression and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

Compared to DXA, the Dixon approach presented the least bias in LBM/weight% than James and Janma models (bias 0.4±7.3%, - 8.0±9.4%, and - 3.3±8.3% respectively). SUV normalized by body weight (SUVbw) was positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) for both FDG (e.g., liver: r = 0.45, p < 0.001) and PSMA scans (r = 0.20, p = 0.31), while SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUVlean) revealed a decreased dependency on BMI (r = 0.22, 0.08, 0.14, p = 0.04, 0.46, 0.18 for Dixon, James, and Janma models, respectively). The liver SUVbw of obese/overweight patients was significantly larger (p < 0.001) than that of normal patients, whereas the bias was mostly eliminated in SUVlean. One-way ANOVA showed significant difference (p < 0.001) between SUVlean in major organs measured using Dixon method vs James and Janma models.

CONCLUSION

Significant systematic variation was found using different approaches to calculate SUVlean. A consistent correction method should be applied for serial PET/MR scans. The Dixon method provides the most accurate measure of LBM, yielding the least bias of all approaches when compared to DXA.

NEMA NU2-2012 performance measurements of the United Imaging uPMR790: an integrated PET/MR system

PURPOSE

In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the positron emission tomography (PET) performance of, to the best of our knowledge, the third commercially available whole-body integrated PET/magnetic resonance (MR) system.

METHODS

The PET system performance was measured following the NEMA standards with and without simultaneous MR operation. PET spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, count-rate performance, accuracy of count losses and random corrections, image quality, and time-of-flight (TOF) resolution were quantitatively evaluated. Clinical scans were acquired at the PET/MR system and compared with images acquired at a PET/CT with the same digital detector technology.

RESULTS

Measurement results of essential PET performance were reported in the form of MR idle (MR pulsing). The axial, radial, and tangential spatial resolutions were measured as 2.72 mm (2.73 mm), 2.86 mm (2.85 mm), and 2.81 mm (2.82 mm) FWHM, respectively, at 1 cm radial offset. The NECR peak was measured as 129.2 kcps (129.5 kcps) at 14.7 kBq mL^-1 (14.2 kBq mL^-1). The scatter fraction at NECR peak was 37.9% (36.5%), and the maximum slice error below NECR was 4.1% (4.5%). Contrast recovery coefficients ranged from 51.8% (52.3%) for 10 mm hot sphere to 87.3% (87.2%) for 37 mm cold sphere. TOF resolution at 5.3 kBq mL^-1 was measured at 535 ps (540 ps). With point source, TOF was measured to be 474 ps (485 ps). Clinical scans revealed similar image quality from the PET/MR and the comparative PET/CT system.

CONCLUSION

The PET performance of the newly introduced integrated PET/MR system is not significantly affected by the simultaneous operation of an MR sequence (2-point DIXON sequence). Measurement results demonstrate comparable performance with other state-of-the-art PET/MR systems. The clinical benefits of high spatial resolution and long axial coverage remain to be further evaluated in specific clinical imaging applications.

Zero Echo Time MRAC on FDG-PET/MR Maintains Diagnostic Accuracy for Alzheimer's Disease; A Simulation Study Combining ADNI-Data

Aim

Attenuation correction using zero-echo time (ZTE) - magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (ZTE-MRAC) has become one of the standard methods for brain-positron emission tomography (PET) on commercial PET/MR scanners. Although the accuracy of the net tracer-uptake quantification based on ZTE-MRAC has been validated, that of the diagnosis for dementia has not yet been clarified, especially in terms of automated statistical analysis. The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of ZTE-MRAC on the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by performing simulation study.

Methods

We recruited 27 subjects, who underwent both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/MR (GE SIGNA) examinations. Additionally, we extracted 107 subjects from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. From the PET raw data acquired on PET/MR, three FDG-PET series were generated, using two vendor-provided MRAC methods (ZTE and Atlas) and CT-based AC. Following spatial normalization to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, we calculated each patient's specific error maps, which correspond to the difference between the PET image corrected using the CTAC method and the PET images corrected using the MRAC methods. To simulate PET maps as if ADNI data had been corrected using MRAC methods, we multiplied each of these 27 error maps with each of the 107 ADNI cases in MNI space. To evaluate the probability of AD in each resulting image, we calculated a cumulative t-value using a fully automated method which had been validated not only in the original ADNI dataset but several multi-center studies. In the method, PET score = 1 is the 95% prediction limit of AD. PET score and diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of AD were evaluated in simulated images using the original ADNI dataset as reference.

Results

Positron emission tomography score was slightly underestimated both in ZTE and Atlas group compared with reference CTAC (-0.0796 ± 0.0938 vs. -0.0784 ± 0.1724). The absolute error of PET score was lower in ZTE than Atlas group (0.098 ± 0.075 vs. 0.145 ± 0.122, p < 0.001). A higher correlation to the original PET score was observed in ZTE vs. Atlas group (R ²: 0.982 vs. 0.961). The accuracy for the discrimination of AD patients from normal control was maintained in ZTE and Atlas compared to CTAC (ZTE vs. Atlas. vs. original; 82.5% vs. 82.1% vs. 83.2% (CI 81.8-84.5%), respectively).

Conclusion

For FDG-PET images on PET/MR, attenuation correction using ZTE-MRI had superior accuracy to an atlas-based method in classification for dementia. ZTE maintains the diagnostic accuracy for AD.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI: determining ideal acquisition times to reduce noise and increase image quality

Background

In this study, we investigate the impact of increased PET acquisition time per bed position on lesion detectability, standard uptake value, and image noise in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI scans.

Methods

Scans of twenty patients were analyzed in this study. Patients were injected with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 (mean, 5.50 ± 1.49 mCi) and imaged on a 3.0 T time-of-flight PET/MRI. PET images were retrospectively reconstructed using 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7, and 10 min of PET data. Lesion detectability was evaluated on a 5-point Likert Scale for each lesion in each reconstruction. Quantitative analysis was performed measuring image noise and lesion uptake.

Results

A total of 55 lesions were identified, and lesion detectability increased from 2.07 ± 1.14 for 0.5 min to 4.93 ± 0.26 for 10 min (p < 0.001), with no significant difference detected between 7 and 10 min of scan time. Average SUV_max decreased from 9.89 ± 6.62 for 0.5 min to 8.64 ± 6.81 for 10 min. Noise decreased from 0.72 ± 0.22 for 0.5 min to 0.31 ± 0.12 for 10 min (p < 0.001) and were nearly equivalent between 7 and 10 min. Pairwise interaction terms between size, SUV_max, and scan time were all found to be significant, although the interaction term between SUV_max and scan time was found to be the most significant.

Conclusions

Increased acquisition duration improves image quality by increasing detectability and reducing noise. In patients with biochemical recurrence, increased acquisition time up to 7 min improves lesion detection.

What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology

Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected and characterized non-invasively, so as to provide referring oncologists with essential information to support therapy management decisions. Following the onset of stand-alone anatomical and functional imaging, we witness a push towards integrating molecular image information through various methods, including anato-metabolic imaging (e.g., PET/CT), advanced MRI, optical or ultrasound imaging.

This perspective paper highlights a number of key technological and methodological advances in imaging instrumentation related to anatomical, functional, molecular medicine and hybrid imaging, that is understood as the hardware-based combination of complementary anatomical and molecular imaging. These include novel detector technologies for ionizing radiation used in CT and nuclear medicine imaging, and novel system developments in MRI and optical as well as opto-acoustic imaging. We will also highlight new data processing methods for improved non-invasive tissue characterization. Following a general introduction to the role of imaging in oncology patient management we introduce imaging methods with well-defined clinical applications and potential for clinical translation. For each modality, we report first on the status quo and, then point to perceived technological and methodological advances in a subsequent status go section. Considering the breadth and dynamics of these developments, this perspective ends with a critical reflection on where the authors, with the majority of them being imaging experts with a background in physics and engineering, believe imaging methods will be in a few years from now.

Overall, methodological and technological medical imaging advances are geared towards increased image contrast, the derivation of reproducible quantitative parameters, an increase in volume sensitivity and a reduction in overall examination time. To ensure full translation to the clinic, this progress in technologies and instrumentation is complemented by advances in relevant acquisition and image-processing protocols and improved data analysis. To this end, we should accept diagnostic images as “data”, and – through the wider adoption of advanced analysis, including machine learning approaches and a “big data” concept – move to the next stage of non-invasive tumour phenotyping. The scans we will be reading in 10 years from now will likely be composed of highly diverse multi-dimensional data from multiple sources, which mandate the use of advanced and interactive visualization and analysis platforms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for real-time data handling by cross-specialty clinical experts with a domain knowledge that will need to go beyond that of plain imaging.

Advances in simultaneous PET/MR for imaging neuroreceptor function

Hybrid imaging using PET/MRI has emerged as a platform for elucidating novel neurobiology, molecular and functional changes in disease, and responses to physiological or pharmacological interventions. For the central nervous system, PET/MRI has provided insights into biochemical processes, linking selective molecular targets and distributed brain function. This review highlights several examples that leverage the strengths of simultaneous PET/MRI, which includes measuring the perturbation of multi-modal imaging signals on dynamic timescales during pharmacological challenges, physiological interventions or behavioral tasks. We discuss important considerations for the experimental design of dynamic PET/MRI studies and data analysis approaches for comparing and quantifying simultaneous PET/MRI data. The primary focus of this review is on functional PET/MRI studies of neurotransmitter and receptor systems, with an emphasis on the dopamine, opioid, serotonin and glutamate systems as molecular neuromodulators. In this context, we provide an overview of studies that employ interventions to alter the activity of neuroreceptors or the release of neurotransmitters. Overall, we emphasize how the synergistic use of simultaneous PET/MRI with appropriate study design and interventions has the potential to expand our knowledge about the molecular and functional dynamics of the living human brain. Finally, we give an outlook on the future opportunities for simultaneous PET/MRI.

Interest of positron-emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning and control

Computed tomography (CT) in the treatment position is currently indispensable for planning radiation therapy. Other imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission-tomography (PET), can be used to improve the definition of the tumour and/or healthy tissue but also to provide functional data of the target volume. Accurate image registration is essential for treatment planning, so MRI and PET scans should be registered at the planning CT scan. Hybrid PET/MRI scans with a hard plane can be used but pose the problem of the absence of CT scans. Finally, techniques for moving the patient on a rigid air-cushioned table allow PET/CT/MRI scans to be performed in the treatment position while limiting the patient's movements exist. At the same time, the advent of MRI-linear accelerator systems allows to redefine image-guided radiotherapy and to propose treatments with daily recalculation of the dose. The place of PET during treatment remains more confidential and currently only in research and prototype status. The same development of imaging during radiotherapy is underway in proton therapy.