Prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse by long-term treatment with omeprazole

[Gastroduodenal ulcer before and after Helicobacter pylori]

Before the discovery of Helicobacter pylori, ulcer disease was considered as the result of a conflict between gastric acid and pepsin, on one side, and protection afforded by gastric mucosal barrier, on the other side. The discovery of H. pylori by Marshall and Warren in 1982 overthrew this conception and revealed ulcer disease mainly as an infectious disease. H. pylori eradication with an appropriate triple therapy is now considered as the gold standard treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer. The pathogenic role of H. pylori lies far beyond ulcer disease since H. pylori is looked as involved in nonulcer dyspepsia, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers, gastric cancer, MALT lymphoma and, eventually, oesophageal adenocarcinoma, and nondigestive diseases as cardiovascular diseases. The pandemic nature of the H. pylori infection, particularly within developing countries, combined with emerging resistances to antibiotics make the development of a vaccine a public health necessity. The relationships between the human host and the bacterium remains mostly unknown, some of which could be beneficial.

The diagnostic yield of various tests for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients on acid-reducing drugs

The diagnostic yield of various tests for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients on acid-reducing drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor blocker (H2RB), was compared. Seventy-four consecutive patients on acid-reducing drugs were enrolled: 34 (46%) were on PPIs, 20 (27%) were on H2RBs and 20 (27%) were not on medications. For those patients on PPIs, RUT and histology results from antrum were negative in 28 (82%) and 17 (50%) patients, respectively (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.4-16.6; P = 0.004), while those from the corpus were negative in was 28 (82%) and 18 (53%) patients, respectively (OR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.3-15.5; P = 0.006). For patients on H2RBs, RUT and histology results from the antrum were negative in 12 (60%) and six (30%) patients, respectively (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 0.8-16.1; P = 0.05), while those from the corpus were negative in 12 (60%) and nine (45%) patients, respectively (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.4-7.8; P = 0.342). For those patients on PPIs, the diagnostic yield of both RUT and histology was reduced from both the antrum and corpus. In these patients, PCR for H. pylori is more sensitive than RUT and histology.

Tolerance to H2 receptor antagonist correlates well with the decline in efficacy against gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The attenuated antisecretory activity of H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) during continuous administration is known as the tolerance phenomenon. The authors recently clarified that presence or absence of Helicobacter pylori infection influences the occurrence of the tolerance phenomenon. The aim of this study was to clarify whether tolerance to H2RA is correlated with attenuation of the inhibitory effect against gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Ten male patients with GERD symptoms and abnormal gastroesophageal reflux were investigated by pH monitoring on days 1 and 15 of continuous oral famotidine administration at 20 mg twice daily, and H. pylori infection was examined using the urea breath test.

RESULTS

Intragastric and intraesophageal acidity were significantly decreased on the first day of famotidine administration, but then increased during the 15-day administration period in seven patients who were negative for H. pylori. In contrast, the efficacy of famotidine against gastric acid secretion and gastroesophageal acid reflux was not attenuated in three H. pylori-positive patients. The changes in GERD symptoms were correlated with the change in the degree of gastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSION

The presence or absence of tolerance to H2RA during 15-day administration is correlated with the efficacy for inhibition of gastroesophageal acid reflux.

Helicobacter pylori infection prevents the occurrence of the tolerance phenomenon of histamine H2 receptor antagonists

BACKGROUND

The attenuated anti-secretory activity of H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) during continuous administration is referred to as the tolerance phenomenon. However, it is not clarified whether Helicobacter pylori infection affects the occurrence of tolerance to H2RA. It is also not clarified whether the tolerance phenomenon occurs to a new H2RA, lafutidine.

AIM

To investigate the occurrence of the tolerance phenomenon in subjects with and without H. pylori infection during the continuous administration of lafutidine and famotidine.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subjects were 20 healthy male volunteers (seven H. pylori positive and 13 H. pylori negative cases). All subjects were examined by ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring five times without medication, on the first and 15th day of the administration of 20 mg b.d. famotidine and 10 mg b.d. lafutidine in a cross-over fashion.

RESULTS

The tolerance phenomenon was not observed in H. pylori-positive subjects during the 15-day-long administration of both H2RAs. In contrast, the tolerance phenomenon was observed in H. pylori negative subjects, which has been previously reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that H. pylori infection affects the tolerance phenomenon during continuous administration of H2RAs.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori compared with long-term acid suppression in duodenal ulcer disease. A randomized trial with 2-year follow-up. The Danish Ulcer Study Group

BACKGROUND

Trials evaluating long-term management of duodenal ulcer disease have mainly been focused on recurrence of ulcers, disregarding effects on dyspeptic and reflux symptoms. Profound acid inhibition with a proton pump inhibitor is the gold standard therapy in acid-related diseases. We aimed to compare the symptomatic effects of eradication therapy with those of long-term omeprazole treatment in a design with periods both with and without acid inhibition.

METHODS

Patients with active duodenal ulcer were randomized either to omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily until healing, followed by omeprazole, 20 mg/ day for 1 year, or to eradication therapy (metronidazole, amoxicillin, and omeprazole for 2 weeks) followed by placebo for 1 year. All patients were followed up passively for an additional year. Clinical controls were performed every 2 months the 1st year (maintenance phase) and every 6 months during the passive follow-up phase. The study was multicentric and double-blind. The primary end-point was discontinuation of treatment, irrespective of reason.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-six patients were randomized (139 in the eradication treatment group). In the maintenance phase there were no differences in the reporting of dyspeptic symptoms or in premature withdrawal. In the passive follow-up phase only five patients in the eradication therapy group discontinued owing to relapse of dyspeptic symptoms or ulcer, compared with 51 patients initially randomized to long-term omeprazole. There were no differences in reflux symptoms or in the development of reflux oesophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Eradication therapy and long-term omeprazole are equally effective in controlling dyspeptic symptoms and reflux in duodenal ulcer patients with healed ulcers. One-quarter of the duodenal ulcer patients who start eradication therapy continue to be symptomatic or fail therapy for other reasons over a 2-year period. Eradication therapy does not increase the risk of reflux in ulcer patients.

Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are drugs which irreversibly inhibit proton pump (H+/K+ ATPase) function and are the most potent gastric acid-suppressing agents in clinical use. There is now a substantial body of evidence showing improved efficacy of PPIs over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists and other drugs in acid-related disorders. Omeprazole 20 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day, pantoprazole 40 mg/day or rabeprazole 20 mg/day for 2 to 4 weeks are more effective than standard doses of H2-receptor antagonists in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers. Patients with gastric ulcers should receive standard doses of PPIs as for duodenal ulcers but for a longer time period (4 to 8 weeks). There is no conclusive evidence to support the use of a particular PPI over another for either duodenal or gastric ulcer healing. For Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulceration, a combination of a PPI and 2 antibacterials will eradicate H. pylori in over 90% of cases and significantly reduce ulcer recurrence. Patients with H. pylori-positive gastric ulcers should be managed similarly. PPIs also have efficacy advantages over ranitidine and misoprostol and are better tolerated than misoprostol in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In endoscopically proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, standard daily doses of the PPIs are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists for healing, and patients should receive a 4 to 8 week course of treatment. For severe reflux, with ulceration and/or stricture formation, a higher dose regimen (omeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 60 mg, pantoprazole 80 mg or rabeprazole 40 mg daily) appears to yield better healing rates. There is little evidence that PPIs lead to resolution of Barrett's oesophagus or a reduction of subsequent adenocarcinoma development, but PPIs are indicated in healing of any associated ulceration. In Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, PPIs have become the treatment of choice for the management of gastric acid hypersecretion.

Age-related changes in cobalamin (vitamin B12) handling. Implications for therapy

Cobalamin (vitamin B12) deficiency is more common in the elderly than in younger patients. This is because of the increased prevalence of cobalamin malabsorption in this age group, which is mainly caused by (autoimmune) atrophic body gastritis. Cobalamin supplementation is affordable and nontoxic, and it may prevent irreversible neurological damage if started early. Elderly individuals with cobalamin deficiency may present with neuropsychiatric or metabolic deficiencies, without frank macrocytic anaemia. An investigation of symptoms and/or signs includes the diagnosis of deficiency as well as any underlying cause. Deficiency states can still exist even when serum cobalamin levels are higher than the traditional lower reference limit. Cobalamin-responsive elevations of serum methylmalonic acid (MMA) and homocysteine are helpful laboratory tools for the diagnosis. The health-related reference ranges for homocysteine and MMA appear to vary with age and gender. Atrophic body gastritis is indirectly diagnosed by measuring serum levels of gastrin and pepsinogens, and it may cause dietary cobalamin malabsorption despite a normal traditional Schilling's test. The use of gastroscopy may also be considered to diagnose dysplasia, bacterial overgrowth and intestinal villous atrophy in healthy patients with atrophic body gastritis or concomitant iron or folic acid deficiency. Elderly patients respond to cobalamin treatment as fully as younger patients, with complete haematological recovery and complete or good partial resolution of neurological deficits. Chronic dementia responds poorly but should, nevertheless, be treated if there is a metabolic deficiency (as indicated by elevated homocysteine and/or MMA levels). Patients who are at risk from cobalamin deficiency include those with a gastrointestinal predisposition (e.g. atrophic body gastritis or previous partial gastrectomy), autoimmune disorders [type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and thyroid disorders], those receiving long term therapy with gastric acid inhibitors or biguanides, and those undergoing nitrous oxide anaesthesia. To date, inadequate cobalamin intake has not proven to be a major risk factor. Intervention trials of cobalamin, folic acid and pyridoxine (vitamin B6) in unselected elderly populations are currently under way.

Omeprazole. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Omeprazole, a gastric acid pump inhibitor, dose-dependently controls gastric acid secretion: the drug has greater antisecretory activity than histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Omeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day is more effective than histamine H2-receptor antagonists in the short term treatment of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Available data suggest that omeprazole 10 to 40 mg/day is also more effective than ranitidine in the maintenance therapy of duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. The drug is also effective in patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer or reflux oesophagitis poorly responsive to histamine H2-receptor antagonists. The efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg/day appears to be similar to that of lansoprazole 30 mg/day in the short term treatment of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. However, most available studies have been reported in abstract form only, and 2 of 3 studies in patients with duodenal ulcer have shown greater healing rates at 2 (but not 4) weeks with lansoprazole. Helicobacter pylori eradication decreases duodenal ulcer relapse rates and appears to be associated with improved duodenal ulcer healing rates. Evidence also suggests that H. pylori eradication is associated with reduced gastric ulcer relapse rates. Omeprazole monotherapy may suppress but does not eradicate H. pylori infection. Eradication rates with omeprazole 20 or 40 mg twice daily plus amoxicillin usually up to 2 g/day (3 g/day in a few studies) for 2 weeks appear to be similar to those of standard triple therapy (bismuth salt plus metronidazole, plus tetracycline or amoxicillin) or omeprazole plus clarithromycin, although eradication rates vary widely. Omeprazole plus amoxicillin appears to be better tolerated than triple therapy and represents a first-line treatment alternative in patients with H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease. Omeprazole plus amoxicillin plus metronidazole appears to be more effective than omeprazole plus amoxicillin in patients with metronidazole-sensitive H. pylori infection. Omeprazole remains a treatment of choice in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The dosages should be adjusted according to individual response. However, relatively low dosages of 10 to 40 mg/day may be sufficient in some patients. The drug has also shown promise in the treatment of children with severe reflux oesophagitis, in patients with reflux oesophagitis and coexisting systemic sclerosis, and in the prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Evidence suggests that omeprazole is more effective than ranitidine in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastric damage who continue to take NSAIDs, especially in patients with large gastric ulcers; however, completion of ongoing studies is required to verify this.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)