Prehospital EMS treatment of pediatric asthma and what happens before help arrives?

Impact of prehospital pediatric asthma management protocol adherence on clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of EMS protocol non-adherence during pediatric asthma encounters and its association with emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of asthma encounters aged 2-17 years transported by EMS to a pediatric ED from 2012 to 2017. Our primary outcome was hospital admission based on prehospital protocol adherence defined as: (1) bronchodilator administration, (2) treatment of hypoxia with oxygen, or (3) administration of intramuscular (IM) epinephrine in encounters with high severity of distress. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between protocol non-adherence and hospital admission.

RESULTS

During the study period, 290 EMS encounters met inclusion criteria. Median age was 9 years (IQR 5-12), 63% were male, 40% had moderate to severe exacerbations, and 24% were admitted. Protocol non-adherence occurred in 32% of encounters with failure to administer bronchodilators in 27% and failure to administer IM epinephrine when indicated in 83%. Prehospital steroids were administered in 8% of encounters. After adjusting for covariates, protocol non-adherence was not statistically associated with likelihood of inpatient admission (OR 1.3; 95% CI: 0.6-2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Among prehospital pediatric asthma encounters, EMS protocol non-adherence is common but not associated with a higher frequency of hospital admission. Hospital admission was associated with acute exacerbation severity suggesting further research is needed to develop a valid prehospital asthma severity assessment scoring tool.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Prehospital management of pediatric asthma patients in a large emergency medical services system

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common pediatric diagnosis for emergency medical services (EMS) transports, however there is a paucity of data on prehospital asthma management. The purpose of this study was to describe prehospital management of pediatric patients with suspected asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records from 24 ground EMS agencies in Southwestern Pennsylvania between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017. We identified patients 2 to 17 years with documented wheezing, excluding those with suspected anaphylaxis. Patients with documented respiratory distress were classified as severe asthma. We report descriptive statistics of demographics, vital signs, and management including administration of medications and performance of procedures.

RESULTS

Of 19 246 pediatric transports, 1078 (5.6%) patients had wheezing. Of these, 532 (49%) met criteria for severe asthma. Patients with severe asthma were more likely to be adolescents compared to those with nonsevere asthma (49.6% vs 6%; P < .001). While rates of intravenous methylprednisolone administration were higher in patients with severe asthma (68/532, 12.8%) compared to those with nonsevere asthma (13/546, 2.4%; P < .001), overall use of steroids was low (7.5%). Other therapies provided included albuterol (n = 699, 64.8%), ipratropium bromide (n = 271, 25.1%), and oxygen (n = 280, 26.0%). One hundred eighty patients (16.7%) received a peripheral IV line. Two patients (0.4%) were given continuous positive airway pressure.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 6% of pediatric EMS transports are for asthma. Steroid usage was low in even those with severe asthma, representing an area of process improvement. These data provide a baseline to future research to identify interventions that may improve outcomes.

A model protocol for emergency medical services management of asthma exacerbations

Emergency medical services (EMS) is an important part of the continuum of asthma management. The magnitude of the EMS responsibility is very large, with millions of patients with asthma treated each year by EMS personnel. In response to inconsistencies between the 1997 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program asthma guidelines and a variety of existing EMS protocols on the management of asthma exacerbations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a workgroup in 2004 to discuss the various opportunities and challenges ahead. At the meeting, and over the ensuing year, the workgroup created a model protocol that was derived from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines. The model protocol is available in both text and algorithm format and offers guidance for EMS systems to develop and implement treatment protocols in their local areas. The workgroup recommendations emphasize flexibility, simplicity, and low-risk practices. By integrating these recommendations into existing protocols, we believe that EMS systems could improve prehospital care for patients with asthma. Demonstration projects are needed to carefully examine the implementation process and the actual impact of the model protocol on various outcomes. The workgroup also encourages more research on EMS management of asthma exacerbations. In the meantime, improved collaboration between EMS and national asthma organizations is an immediate priority and will continue to advance future discussions on how to improve asthma management in the prehospital setting. The workgroup hopes that state and local EMS systems will see the value of the model protocol and encourage its use.

Management and outcomes of pediatric patients transported by emergency medical services in a Canadian prehospital system

OBJECTIVES

There is uncertainty around the types of interventions that are provided by emergency medical services (EMS) to children during prehospital transport. We describe the patient characteristics, events, interventions provided and outcomes of a cohort of children transported by EMS.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted in a city of 750 000 people with a 2-tiered EMS system. All children <16 years of age who were attended by EMS during a 6-month period were enrolled. Data were extracted from ambulance call reports and hospital charts, and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

During the study period there were 1377 pediatric EMS calls. Mean age was 8.2 years (standard deviation 5.4), and the most Common diagnoses were trauma (44.9%), seizure (11.8%) and respiratory distress (8.8%). The ambulance return code was Urgent in 7%, Prompt in 57%, Deferrable in 8% and Not Transported in 28%. Fifty-six percent received either an Advanced Life Support or Basic Life Support prehospital intervention. Common procedures included cardiac monitoring (20.0%), oxygen administration (19.8%), blood glucose monitoring (16.3%), spine board (12.2%), limb immobilization (11.1%) and cervical collar (10.0%). Uncommon procedures included administering medications intravenously (IV) (1.4%), bag-valve-mask ventilation (0.3%) and endotracheal intubation (0.1%). Seventy-eight percent of attempted IV lines were successful. Only 9.0% of EMS-transported children were admitted to hospital, and 2.2% were admitted to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

This first study of Canadian pediatric prehospital interventions shows a high rate of non-transport, and a low rate of Urgent transports and hospital admissions for children. Very few children receive prehospital airway management, ventilation or IV medications; consequently EMS personnel have little opportunity to maintain these pediatric skills in the field.

Out-of-hospital administration of albuterol for asthma by basic life support providers

BACKGROUND

Each year, approximately 40,000 patients with acute asthma are transported by the Fire Department of New York City (NYC) Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Out-of-hospital administration of bronchodilator therapy has, however, been restricted by scope of practice to advanced life support (ALS) providers. Since the rapid availability of ALS units cannot always be assured, some individuals with acute asthma may receive only basic life support (BLS) measures in the field.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate that basic emergency medical technicians (EMT-Bs) are able to effectively administer nebulized albuterol to asthma patients in the out-of-hospital environment.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational cohort study of 9-1-1 asthma calls received by the NYC EMS system for patients between the ages of 1 and 65 years. Baseline peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and other clinical measures were obtained prior to and following BLS administration of one or two treatments with nebulized albuterol.

RESULTS

Data were available for 3,351 patients over a one-year study period. One out-of-hospital albuterol treatment was given in 60%, while 40% of the patients received two. The PEFRs increased from 40.4% predicted (SD +/-21.0) to 54.8% predicted (SD +/-26.1), for a posttreatment improvement of 14.4% points (95% CI = 13.8 to 15.1). Other clinical outcome measures, including dyspnea index, respiratory rate, and use of accessory muscles, also showed improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that EMT-Bs can effectively administer albuterol to acute asthma patients in the out-of-hospital environment.

Prehospital treatment of acute asthma in a rural state

BACKGROUND

Acute asthma exacerbations can be life threatening and are recognizable to emergency medical service (EMS) personnel; however, the therapies and medications which these emergency service personnel can use to treat exacerbations are limited. Several studies have demonstrated the effective use of beta2-agonist therapy in the treatment of patients complaining of wheezing or dyspnea, yet few EMS personnel can administer them.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine what therapeutic interventions emergency personnel around the state of New Mexico could use when responding to a call for a severe asthma exacerbation.

METHODS

Questionnaires were distributed over a period of three years, 1992-1994, to all Emergency Service Agencies in New Mexico.

RESULTS

Eighty percent of the emergency medical personnel administer oxygen to patients experiencing acute asthma exacerbations. Seventeen percent of EMS personnel administer epinephrine, 4% administer steroids, and only 23% administer beta2 agonists. Only in more populated areas were EMS personnel allowed to administer beta2 agonists, and those personnel had to have at least intermediate-level training. Most emergency response teams in the state consisted of EMT Basics and provided only basic life support services. In rural New Mexico, transport to a hospital can often take over one hour, which left EMS crews feeling helpless.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that due to the rural nature of New Mexico, EMS personnel should be trained in the use of beta2 agonists and allowed to administer them to patients with acute asthma exacerbations. In addition, standard protocols for the pre-hospital management of acute asthma exacerbations should be instituted.