Chinese translation and validation of the Kujala scale for patients with patellofemoral pain

Effects of functional strength training on pain, function, and lower extremity biomechanics in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common disorder affecting the lower extremity. This study aimed to compare the effects of functional strength training (FST) and standard strength training (SST) in PFPS patients.

METHODS

Forty college students (aged 18-30 years) with PFPS and no exercise habits were randomized into FST group (n = 20) and SST group (n = 20). FST group underwent six weeks of lower extremity training focused on functional adaptations, whereas SST group focus on lower extremity strength training. Function (Kujala Patellofemoral Scale, KPS), pain (visual analog scale, VAS), peak joint angles of hip, knee, and ankle, along with muscle activation (step-down test) of Vastus medialis, Vastus lateralis, Biceps femoris, Semitendinosus, Gluteus maximus, and Gluteus medius were assessed at baseline and after intervention.

RESULTS

FST outperformed SST in pain reduction (p = 0.026) and function (p = 0.006) post-intervention. The FST group also showed increased hip flexion (p < 0.001), gluteus maximus activation (p < 0.001), and reduced knee valgus (p = 0.032), while SST group exhibited greater knee flexion (p = 0.008), and higher activation of the lateral femoral (p < 0.001) and semitendinosus (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Interventions focused on functional adaptations result in differential kinematic and muscle activation changes that may result in greater improvements in pain and knee function than lower limb muscle strengthening alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn. NO: ChiCTR2400087664. Date 01/08/2024.

Non-absorbable surgical sutures versus autologous tendons in the reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligaments: a randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopic-assisted medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is a common surgical procedure for patellar dislocation. We present the protocol of a randomised controlled clinical trial to compare postoperative pain, knee function and quality of life outcomes of MPFL reconstruction using the non-absorbable surgical sutures (FiberWire) and semitendinosus tendon.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This single-blind, randomised controlled trial enrolled patients with patellar dislocation who were undergoing inpatient surgery at the Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Participants were randomly allocated to either the experimental or the control group using a random number table method, with an equal number of 15 subjects in each group. The experimental group was treated with a FiberWire for the MPFLR, whereas the control group received reconstruction using the semitendinosus tendon. A standardised postoperative rehabilitation protocol was implemented for both groups. All subjects will be evaluated for imaging, pain, knee function and quality of life at five time points: preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. MRI scans will be performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively to assess changes in patellar tilt angles and congruence angles. Pain assessment is performed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Knee function will be assessed using the Kujala score, Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee function score. Quality of life was assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Survey scale.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University on 26 October 2021 (ethics number: 202110478) and registered in the China Clinical Trials Registry on 15 March 2022. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200057574.

Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS): structural and criterion validity in Brazilian population with patellofemoral pain

PURPOSE

To identify the best internal structure of the Brazilian version of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), comparing different instrument structures (structural validity) and correlating the scores of the versions (criterion validity).

METHODS

We included Brazilian volunteers, aged ≥ 18 years, with patellofemoral pain (PFP) for at least 3 months. We used the confirmatory factor analysis and considered the following fit indices: chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). We considered the structure with the lowest values of the Akaike information criterion (AIC), sample size adjusted Bayesian information criterion (SABIC), and assessed criterion validity using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) to correlate the long and short versions.

RESULTS

The study included 101 participants, mostly women (65.3%), young adults (~ 31 years old), overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2), incomplete higher education (37.6%), and physically active (64.4%). The original 1-domain, 13-item structure showed adequate fit indices (chi-square/GL < 3.00, TLI and CFI > 0.90, and RMSEA < 0, 08). However, items 11 and 12 had a factorial load of less than 0.23. Therefore, we excluded items 11 and 12 and found adequate fit indices (chi-square/GL < 3.00, TLI and CFI > 0.90, and RMSEA < 0, 08) and lower AIC and SABIC values. We observed a correlation coefficient above the acceptable cutoff of 0.70 (r = 0.966, p-value < 0.001) between the versions.

CONCLUSION

The 11-item AKPS (without items 11 and 12) is the version with the most adequate internal structure and correlates satisfactorily with the long version of the instrument.

Comparing the effect of intermittent blood flow restriction training and high-load resistance training in patients with patellofemoral pain: study protocol for a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) syndrome is a common knee joint functional disorder. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training has shown promise in improving PFP; however, the effectiveness of intermittent BFR (iBFR) training remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the rehabilitative effects of iBFR combined with low-load resistance training and high-load resistance training in PFP patients and to assess the effectiveness of iBFR combined with low-load resistance training for improving PFP.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised, patient-assessor blinded, controlled trial will include 42 eligible PFP patients randomly allocated to an intervention group (iBFR combined with low-load resistance training) or a control group (high-load resistance training) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will receive interventions three times per week for 8 weeks and will be followed up for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure is pain, and the secondary outcomes include self-reported function, quality of life, muscle strength and muscle thickness. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 8 weeks and 24 weeks during follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed.Collectively, we expect that the findings of this randomised clinical trial will contribute to understanding the potential benefits of iBFR training and provide insightful guidance for developing more effective treatment strategies for patients with PFP.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Sports Science Experiment Ethics Committee of Beijing Sport University (2022274H). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068281).

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults and Adolescents With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review of Construct Validity, Reliability, Responsiveness, and Interpretability Using the COSMIN Methodology

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to appraise the construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess function and pain in adults and adolescents with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Systematic review of measurement properties LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 6, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that assessed the measurement properties of English-language PROMs for PFP and their cultural adaptations and translations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology, we determined overall ratings and quality of evidence for construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. We extracted data related to interpretability for clinical use. RESULTS: After screening 7066 titles, 61 studies for 33 PROMs were included. Only 2 PROMs had evidence of "sufficient" or "indeterminate" quality for all measurement properties. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score patellofemoral subscale (KOOS-PF) had "low" to "high" quality evidence for a rating of "sufficient" for 4 measurement properties. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) had very low-quality evidence for a "sufficient" rating for 4 measurement properties. The KOOS-PF and LEFS were rated "indeterminate" for structural validity and internal consistency. The KOOS-PF had the best interpretability with reported minimal important change and 0% ceiling and floor effects. No studies examined cross-cultural validity. CONCLUSION: The KOOS-PF and LEFS had the strongest measurement properties among PROMs used for PFP. More research is needed, particularly regarding structural validity and interpretability of PROMs. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(8):1-20. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11730.

Patient-reported outcome measures for patellofemoral disorders: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Patellofemoral conditions include, but are not limited to, anterior knee pain syndrome and patellar instability. Patients and surgeons may find it difficult to identify the specific source of the symptoms and clinical scenarios, so patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may be a useful diagnostic aid. There are a number of available PROMs for patellofemoral conditions, which are often used indistinctly. This systematic review explores the available PROMs for patellofemoral conditions, their use and methodological quality.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, searching for scientific articles relating to PROMs in patellofemoral conditions, from inception to July 2022. Scoring systems including physician-directed or imagining assessment were not included. All types of conditions in the patellofemoral joint were considered.

RESULTS

Twenty-two relevant PROMs were encountered, divided into four categories: eight PROMs for anterior knee pain syndrome, five for patellar instability, four for other patellofemoral conditions and five for non-specific PROMs.

CONCLUSIONS

While many PROMs have been found used in patellofemoral research, only few of them have showed sufficient methodological quality. In addition, PROMs employed in PF literature are often inaccurately chosen. This review may help authors to better understand the characteristics of specific patellofemoral PROMs, in order to select the more appropriate and recommended ones.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Assessments of early patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis features after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Persistent anterior knee pain and subsequent patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis (OA) are common symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Quadriceps weakness and atrophy is also common after ACLR. This can be contributed by arthrogenic muscle inhibition and disuse, caused by joint swelling, pain, and inflammation after surgery. With quadriceps atrophy and weakness are associated with PFJ pain, this can cause further disuse exacerbating muscle atrophy. Herein, this study aims to identify early changes in musculoskeletal, functional and quality of health parameters for knee OA after 5 years of ACLR.

METHODS

Patients treated with arthroscopically assisted single-bundle ACLR using hamstrings graft for more than 5 years were identified and recruited from our clinic registry. Those with persistent anterior knee pain were invited back for our follow-up study. For all participants, basic clinical demography and standard knee X-ray were taken. Likewise, clinical history, symptomatology, and physical examination were performed to confirm isolated PFJ pain. Outcome measures including leg quadriceps quality using ultrasound, functional performance using pressure mat and pain using self-reported questionnaires (KOOS, Kujala and IKDC) were assessed. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed by two reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients with unilateral injury who had undergone ACLR 5-years ago with persistent anterior knee pain participated in this present study. Toward the muscle quality, thinner vastus medialis and more stiffness in vastus lateralis were found in post-ACLR knees (p < 0.05). Functionally, patients with more anterior knee pain tended to shift more of their body weight towards the non-injured limb with increasing knee flexion. In accordance, rectus femoris muscle stiffness in the ACLR knee was significantly correlated with pain (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, it was found that patients having higher degree of anterior knee pain were associated with higher vastus medialis muscle stiffness and thinner vastus lateralis muscle thickness. Similarly, patients with more anterior knee pain tended to shift more of their body weight towards the non-injured limb leading to an abnormal PFJ loading. Taken together, this current study helped to indicate that persistent quadriceps muscle weakness is potential contributing factor to the early development of PFJ pain.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adults and Adolescents with Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review of Content Validity and Feasibility Using the COSMIN Methodology

OBJECTIVE: To assess the content validity and feasibility of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess pain and function in adults and adolescents with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Systematic review. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 6, 2022. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that described the development or evaluation of the content validity of English-language PROMs for PFP, as well as their translations and cultural adaptations to different languages. DATA SYNTHESIS: Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology, we determined overall ratings and quality of evidence for the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of PROMs. We extracted data related to feasibility for clinical use (eg, administration time and scoring ease). RESULTS: Forty-three studies for 33 PROMs were included. The overall quality of most studies was "inadequate" due to failure to engage stakeholders and/or ensure adherence to rigorous qualitative research procedures. Of all PROMs evaluated, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Patellofemoral subscale (KOOS-PF), was the only PROM with sufficient content validity components. Quality of evidence for content validity of the KOOS-PF was low. Most PROMs were rated feasible for clinical and research purposes. CONCLUSION: Most PROMs used to measure pain and function in patients with PFP have inadequate content validity. The KOOS-PF had the highest overall content validity. We recommend the KOOS-PF for evaluating pain and function (in research and clinical practice) in adults and adolescents with PFP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(1):23-39. Epub: 18 October 2022. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.11317.

Validation of the cultural adaptation of the Kujala score in Arabic

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain is a common condition. The Kujala score is a well-established scoring system to assess anterior knee pain and has been translated into many languages including Arabic. The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to culturally adapt the Arabic version of the Kujala score and determine its validity.

METHODS

The Kujala score is composed of 13 multiple-choice questions. We modified two questions in the score; running and squatting, and were replaced with questions related to walking on different terrain and prostration, each with the same number of answer choices as the original questions so as not to affect the final score. These modifications were written in Arabic by the same group who translated and validated the original score into Arabic. The original and modified Kujala scores was printed and given to patients complaining of patellofemoral pain to be filled during their visit to the orthopedic outpatient clinics. Final scores for the original and modified questionnaires were calculated. Data was analyzed using SPSS statistics version 21.0 measuring Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were included in the study, 28 (29.8%) men and 66 (70.2%) women. The mean age for the included patients was 43.67 (± 14.46) years. The mean score for the modified initial questionnaire was 63.91 (± 16.32), and the mean score for the modified re-test questionnaire was 66.52 (± 17.50). There was a statistically significant difference between the mean scores (p = 0.041), with a mean difference of 1.97 (95% CI 0.08 to 3.856). We found a significant strong correlation between the score before and after changing the questions with a p value of < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The culturally modified Arabic Kujala questionnaire is shown to be a valid, well-designed tool and an appropriate method of measuring patellofemoral pain.

The adaptation of sport assessment-patella questionnaire into simplified Chinese version: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity

Background

The original version of Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella Questionnaire (VISA-P) is developed in English, and aimed to assess the severity of patellar tendinopathy symptoms. Before used in China, it should be translated to Chinese version.

Objectives

Our aim is to make a translation/cross-culturally adaption for the VISA-P into simplified Chinese version (VISA-PC). And primarily validate the VISA-PC in Chinese speaking population.

Methods

The translation process of VISA-P questionnaire into simplified Chinese version (VISP-PC) followed the International recognized guideline. Cross-cultural adaptation was carried out with a clinical measurement study. A total of 128 projects which consisted 33 healthy students, 39 patients with patellar tendinopathy and 56 military students (receive military training as at-risk population) were included into this study. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach’s alpha, and test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Construct validity and floor and ceiling effects were also tested.

Results

The scores were 95.84 ± 5.97 of healthy group, 91.87 ± 9.03 of at-risk group, 62.49 ± 11.39 of pathological group. There is no ceiling and floor effect of VISA-PC. The Cronbach’s alpha (0.895) and ICC (0.986) values showed good internal consistency and reliability. There were high correlations between VISA-PC and Kujala patellofemoral score (r = 0.721). VISA-PC score also had good correlation with the relevant SF-36 items.

Conclusion

The VISA-PC was well translated into simplified Chinese version (VISA-PC), which is reliable and valid for Chinese-speaking patients with patellar tendinopathy.

Level of evidence

II.

The reliability, validity, interpretability, and responsiveness of the Norwegian version of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale in patellofemoral pain

PURPOSE

To determine the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Norwegian Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

METHODS

The AKPS was translated into Norwegian. One hundred and twelve patients with PFP participated in a randomized controlled trial. Fifty stable patients completed the AKPS at a one-week interval for test-retest reliability. Smallest detectable change (SDC) and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated. Validity and responsiveness were assessed using hypothesis testing for correlations with other scores and known-group validity. Minimal important change (MIC) and responsiveness were evaluated at three months.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_agreement) for sum score was 0.83. Smallest detectable change was 13. No floor/ceiling effects were found for total score, but ceiling effects were found on eight of 13 individual items. Hypothesis testing for construct validity and responsiveness was largely confirmed but correlations were moderate to low. The MIC was 11. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.66 (95% CI 0.56-0.77) indicating moderate responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The Norwegian AKPS had comparable measurement properties to other versions, with acceptable reliability and construct validity. We found moderate responsiveness which may be related to ceiling effects on several items.Implications for rehabilitationThe Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) is a commonly used outcome measure in patellofemoral pain, having acceptable reliability and moderate responsiveness.A change in AKPS total score of 11 points would be considered important by the patient, although changes up to 13 points may be due to measurement error.The AKPS has limitations including ceiling effects on most individual items in this patient population, and low correlation between pain and AKPS that questions the validity of the score. A revision of the score should be considered.

Patellofemoral Pain

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common musculoskeletal-related condition that is characterized by insidious onset of poorly defined pain, localized to the anterior retropatellar and/or peripatellar region of the knee. The onset of symptoms can be slow or acutely develop with a worsening of pain accompanying lower-limb loading activities (eg, squatting, prolonged sitting, ascending/descending stairs, jumping, or running). Symptoms can restrict participation in physical activity, sports, and work, as well as recur and persist for years. This clinical practice guideline will allow physical therapists and other rehabilitation specialists to stay up to date with evolving PFP knowledge and practices, and help them to make evidence-based treatment decisions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(9):CPG1-CPG95. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.0302.

Effects of neuromuscular training on pain intensity and self-reported functionality for patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is common and affects approximately 15% of individuals at different ages and activity levels. As a non-surgical intervention, physiotherapy is widely used to treat PFPS. Neuromuscular training exercise is one of the most effective methods for decreasing musculoskeletal pain and improving knee function. However, the effectiveness of neuromuscular training exercise for treating PFPS is not without argument. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of neuromuscular training exercise on patellofemoral pain and whether the neuromuscular training exercise have more advantage effects than taping and health education.

METHODS

We will operate a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial of 60 patients with patellofemoral pain. Individuals will be indiscriminately assigned to two intervention groups and a health education group. The neuromuscular training exercise which includes the muscle strength training, balance training and knee joint proprioception training, and taping group will use "Y" and "I" type taping on the participants three times a week for three months. The health education group will be given education lectures once each week and which last for three months. The primary outcome measures include the adverse events, visual analog scale for pain, and Anterior Knee Pain Scale Index, which is a knee function self-report questionnaire to evaluate the function of the knee especially for PFPS patients. The secondary outcome measures are the muscle strength and endurance of knee joint flexion and extensor muscles, knee joint proprioception, muscle thickness of the quadriceps femoris, knee function ability, and quality of life. We will manage the intention-to-treat analysis for individuals who will withdraw from this study.

DISCUSSION

According to previous studies, neuromuscular training exercise and the taping method are effective treatment for PFPS patients. In this study, we will perform a neuromuscular training exercise for patients with PFPS. We believe that this study may prove the effectiveness of neuromuscular training exercise in treating PFPS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800014995 . Registered on 27 February 2018.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patellofemoral Instability: a Critical Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this paper was to review the current psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures that are commonly used for patients with patellofemoral instability. This review provides evidence to guide the selection of subjective outcome measures for assessing outcomes in clinical care and research studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

At the present time, there are two patient-reported outcome measures that have been designed for, and tested on, large cohorts of patellofemoral instability patients, the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) and the Norwich Patellar Instability Score (NPI). The BPII is a wholistic quality of life outcome measure and the NPI is a symptom score. The use of disease-specific outcome measures such as the BPII and NPI, in combination with generic knee, functional activity, and/or psychological outcome measures that have been proven to be valid and reliable for the patellofemoral instability population, is most likely to provide a well-rounded evaluation of treatment outcomes.

Validation of the Arabic version of the Kujala patellofemoral pain scoring system

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral knee pain is a common cause of anterior knee pain. The Kujala anterior knee pain score is a scoring system for the clinical assessment of disease severity. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to validate an Arabic translation of the original Kujala anterior knee pain score to assess Arabic-speaking patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

METHODS

The Kujala anterior knee pain score was translated into Arabic by a group of native Arabic and native English speakers including orthopedic surgeons, residents, and a medical student. Questionnaires were filled by 127 patients visiting our outpatient department complaining of anterior knee pain diagnosed clinically and after exclusion of other pathologies. Questionnaires were re-filled at least 2 weeks later via phone contact from a member of our team. After exclusions, 97 questionnaires were analyzed for reliability using Cronbach's alpha for the scoring system's internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest analysis.

RESULTS

The mean score of the questionnaire before the follow-up was 62.38 (±17.78) and 64.02 (±18.47) after the follow-up. The scoring system's internal consistency measured via Cronbach's alpha was 0.824. Average ICC for the scoring system was 0.948 (CI: 0.923-0.965) and for single measures, 0.902 (CI: 0.856-0.933). Further, 94.8% of patients were contacted before initiating physiotherapy. Forty-six of the patients (47.4%) showed improvement in their scores when contacted, 44 patients (45.4%) showed a slight worsening of their scores and seven patients' (7.2%) scores were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The Arabic translation of the Kujala anterior knee pain score is a valid, reliable, useful, and easy-to-interpret scoring system to assess Arabic-speaking patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability: a prospective multi-centre study

INTRODUCTION

The Kujala score is the most frequently used questionnaire for patellofemoral disorders like pain, instability or osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, we are not aware of a validated German version of the Kujala score. The aim of our study was the translation and linguistic validation of the Kujala score in German-speaking patients with patella instability and the assessment of its measurement characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The German Kujala score was developed in several steps of translation. In addition to healthy controls, the Kujala German was assessed in consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent patellar dislocations. Pre-op, 6 and 12 months postop the patients completed the Kujala German score, the KOOS, the Lysholm score, a VAS Pain, and the SF-12v2 scores. In addition, there was a Kujala German Score retest preop after a 1-week interval.

RESULTS

We found high reliability in terms of internal consistency for the Kujala score (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). Convergent validity with the KOOS (symptom r = 0.65, pain r = 0.78, ADL r = 0.74, sports/recreation r = 0.84, quality of life r = 0.70), the Lysholm score (r = 0.88) and the SF-12 physical component summary score (r = 0.79) and VAS pain (r = - 0.71) was also very high. Discriminant validity in terms of correlation with the SF-12 mental component summary Score was satisfactory (r = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the German version of the Kujala score proved to be a reliable and valid instrument in the setting of a typical patellofemoral disease treated with a standard patellofemoral procedure.

French translation and validation of the "Anterior Knee Pain Scale" (AKPS)

PURPOSE

To linguistically and cross-culturally translate the Anterior Knee Pain Scale into French and to evaluate the reliability and validity of this translated version of the questionnaire.

METHODS

The translation part was performed in six stages, according to international guidelines: (i) two initial translations from English to French; (ii) synthesis of the two translations; (iii) backward translations into the original language; (iv) expert committee to compare the backward translations with the original questionnaire; (v) pre-final version testing and (VI) expert committee appraisal. To validate the French version of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale, we assessed its validity, reliability and floor/ceiling effects. To do this, volunteer patients from the French part of Belgium and from France, with patellofemoral pain were asked to answer the French version of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale at baseline and after 7 days, as well as the generic SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

The Anterior Knee Pain Scale was translated without any major difficulties. A total of 101 subjects aged 34.5 ± 11.4 years (58.4% of women) were included in this study. Results indicated an excellent test-retest reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.96-0.98), a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87), a consistent construct validity (high correlations with the SF-36 questionnaire were found with domains related to physical function (r = 0.80), physical role (r = 0.70) and pain (r = 0.64)) and low or moderate correlations with domains related to mental health (r = 0.26), vitality (r = 0.32) and social function (r = 0.41). Moreover, no floor/ceiling effects have been found.

CONCLUSIONS

A valid French version of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale is now available and can be used with confidence to better assess the disease burden associated with patellofemoral pain. It was successfully cross-culturally adapted into French. Implications for rehabilitation The results on psychometric properties of the French Anterior Knee Pain Scale are comparable with six validated versions obtained for the Finnish, the Turkish, the Chinese, the Dutch, the Thai and the Persian populations. The French translated version of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the functional limitations associated with patellofemoral pain. The test-retest reliability of the French Anterior Knee Pain Scale was excellent, the internal consistency was high and the construct validity was consistent. There were no floor/ceiling effects.

Chinese translation and validation of the Oxford Knee Scale for patients with knee osteoarthritis

Background:

Oxford Knee Scale (OKS) is a commonly used instrument to assess the symptoms and functional status in people with knee osteoarthritis. However, a Chinese version of this scale is not yet available.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to translate the OKS into Chinese and validate the Chinese version of OKS.

Methods:

The Chinese OKS was translated from the original English version following the recommendations of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. One hundred Chinese reading patients with knee osteoarthritis were recruited from local hospitals and physiotherapy clinics. Psychometric properties were evaluated in terms of test–retest reliability and internal consistency. Convergent validity was examined by Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests by comparing its score with the validated Chinese version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Health Outcome Survey Short Form-36.

Results:

Chinese OKS demonstrated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.88). Cronbach α of individual questions was > 0.7. Strong correlation was found between the Chinese OKS and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (ρ > 0.553, p < 0.001). Fairly strong negative correlation was also found between Chinese OKS and Health Outcome Survey Short Form-36 (ρ = −0.273 to −0.666, p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

The Chinese translated version of OKS is a reliable and valid instrument for clinical evaluation in Chinese reading patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties Testing of the Arabic Anterior Knee Pain Scale

Background

PFPS is one of the most frequently occurring overuse injuries affecting the lower limbs. A variety of functional and self-reported outcome measures have been used to assess clinical outcomes of patients with PFPS, however, only the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) has been designed for PFPS patients.

Material/Methods

We followed international recommendations to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the AKPS. The Arabic AKPS and the Arabic RAND 36-item Health Survey were administered to 40 patients who were diagnosed with PFPS. Participants were assessed at baseline and after 2 to 3 days assessed with the Arabic AKPS only. The measurements tested were reliability, validity, and feasibility.

Results

The Arabic AKPS showed high reliability for both temporal stability, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha was 0.81 for the first assessment and 0.75 for the second), excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ICC=0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93, 0.98) and good agreement (standard error of measurement SEM=1.8%). The Arabic AKPS was significantly correlated with physical components of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (Spearman’s rho=0.69: p<0.001). No ceiling or floor effects were observed.

Conclusions

The Arabic AKPS is a valid and reliable tool and is comparable to the original English version and other translated versions.

Greek cultural adaption and validation of the Kujala anterior knee pain scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome

PURPOSE

To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Greek version of the Kujala anterior knee pain scale (KAKPS).

METHODS

The Greek KAKPS was translated from the original English version following standard forward and backward translation procedures. The survey was then conducted in clinical settings by a questionnaire comprising the Greek KAKPS and patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) severity scale. A total of 130 (62 women and 68 men) Greek-reading patients between 18 and 45 years old with anterior knee pain (AKP) for at least four weeks were recruited from physical therapy clinics. To establish test-retest reliability, the patients were asked to complete the KAKPS at initial visit and 2-3 days after the initial visit. The Greek version of the PFPS severity scale was also administered once at initial visit. Internal consistency of the translated instrument was measured using Cronbach's α. An intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess the test-retest reliability of the KAKPS. Concurrent validity was measured by correlating the KAKPS with the PFPS severity scale using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The results showed that the Greek KAKPS has good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.942), test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.921) and concurrent validity (r > 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that the Greek KAKPS has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity when correlated with the PFPS severity scale in adult patients with AKP for at least four weeks. Implications for rehabilitation The Greek version of the KAKPS has been found to be reliable and valid when used in adult patients with AKP for at least four weeks. The results of the psychometric characteristics were compatible with those of the original English version. The KAKPS could be applied in a Greek-speaking population to assess functional limitations and symptoms in patients aged 18-45 years old with AKP for at least four weeks.

Validation and cultural adaptation of "Kujala Score" in Spanish

PURPOSE

To translate the patellofemoral disorder questionnaire "Kujala Score" into Spanish and to adapt it for Spanish culture .

METHODS

International recommendations were followed to translate the "Kujala Score" into Spanish together with a cultural adaptation and validation. We analysed the following parameters: internal consistency, agreement construct validity, test-retest reliability, ceiling and floor effects, and responsiveness. The reproducibility and responsiveness were tested in 72 patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in a test-retest design with follow-up testing at 7 days. The "Kujala Score" and the VISA-P were administered to 98 patients and 30 patients, respectively, who completed the "Kujala Score" and VISA-P after physiotherapy treatment, which consisted of rest, ice, proprioceptive exercise and manual therapy.

RESULTS

The Spanish "Kujala Score" had high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.8; if an item was deleted, Cronbach α = 0.77-0.80), excellent reliability and agreement (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.99), and good construct validity that was significantly correlated with the outcome of the Spanish VISA-P (Spearman rho = 0.7; P < 0.001). No ceiling or floor effects was detected for the Spanish "Kujala Score" or the responsiveness of the participants based on 40 patients receiving physical therapy, rest, ice and proprioceptive exercises for 1 month, demonstrating that it is a good determinant of changes in the symptomatology of patients with knee pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish adaptation of the patellofemoral disorder questionnaire "Kujala Score" proved to be valid and sensitive to clinical changes and to be a reliable instrument to assess the severity of pain and disability in patients with patellofemoral disorders. This questionnaire will be useful in clinical practice and research as an appropriate tool to evaluate and record the symptomatology of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome among Spanish population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level I.

Reliability and Validity of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale: Applications for Use as an Epidemiologic Screener

A screening instrument's ability to provide clinicians with consistent and reproducible information is crucial to intervention. Despite widespread acceptance and clinical use of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) in orthopedics and sports medicine, few studies have reported on its reliability and no such studies have concentrated on child or adolescent samples exclusively, segments of the population for which this instrument is often used. The purpose of the current study was to describe and report on the reliability and validity of the AKPS for use with high school female athletes participating in interscholastic athletics. The study was a secondary analysis of prospective epidemiologic data using established scale validation methods. The records of 414 female athletes 11.0 to 18.1 years of age (Mean 13.9 yrs, SD = 1.7 yrs) were used for analysis. Four different approaches to scoring and scale reduction of the AKPS were evaluated, including the original, ordinal 13-item form, a modified, ordinal 6-item form, a modified, dichotomous 13-item form, and a modified, dichotomous 6-item form. Three different types of reliability (internal consistency, equivalence across forms, standard error of measurement) and one type of validity (criterion-related) were estimated for the AKPS in the current sample. The four scoring formats of the AKPS scale were found to have high internal consistency (αcoef = 0.83 to 0.91), equivalence across the short and long forms (r = 0.98), acceptable standard errors of measurement (0.82 to 3.00), and moderate to high criterion related validity-as determined by physican's diagnosis: 0.92 (13-item form), 0.90 (6-item form). The Kujala AKPS is a valid and reliable measure of anterior knee pain and appropriate for use as an epidemiologic screening tool with adolescent female athletes.

The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Kujala score for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome

PURPOSE

To develop a Thai version of the Kujala score and show the evaluation of the validity and reliability of the score.

METHOD

The Thai version of the Kujala score was developed using the forward-backward translation protocol. The 49 PFPS patients answered the Thai version of questionnaires including the Kujala score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. The validity between the scores has been tested. The reliability was assessed using test-retest reliability and internal consistency.

RESULTS

The Thai version of the Kujala score showed a good correlation with Thai IKDC Subjective Knee Form (Pearson's correlation coefficient; r = 0.74: p < 0.01) and moderate correlation with the Thai SF-36 subscales of physical component summary, total score and role physical (r = 0.586, 0.571 and 0.524, respectively: p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.908 (p < 0.001; 95% CI [0.842-0.947]). The internal consistency was strong with Cronbach's alpha of 0.952 (p < 0.001). No floor and ceiling effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

The Thai version of the Kujala score has shown good validity and reliability. This score can be effectively used for evaluating Thai patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Implications for Rehabilitation The Kujala score is a self-administered questionnaire for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). The validity and reliability of the Thai version of Kujala are compatible with other versions (Turkish, Chinese and Persian version). The Thai version of Kujala has been shown to have validity and reliability in Thai PFPS patients and can be used for clinical evaluation and also in the research work.

A reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to score the impact of knee complaints on work following total knee arthroplasty: the WORQ

The Work, Osteoarthritis or joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ) was developed to assess physical difficulty experienced in work before or following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thirteen questions were designed. The WORQ was tested for internal consistency by factor analysis, internal reliability (Crohnbach's α), and construct validity. A test-retest reproducibility was performed for analyzing standard error of measurement (SEM agreement), reliability (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC) in individuals and groups. Lastly responsiveness (standardized response means [SRM]), floor and ceiling effects and interpretability (minimal important change [MIC]) were analyzed. It is shown that the WORQ is a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire that can be used to evaluate the impact of knee complaints following TKA on patients' ability to work.

Dutch translation of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To translate and validate the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and evaluate the internal consistency, construct validity and ceiling or floor effect.

METHODS

After standard forward and backward translation was performed, 302 patients who have received a TKA or UKA filled out the AKPS together with Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) patella score, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, the Oxford 12-item questionnaire and the SF-36 at follow-up. The internal consistency was tested using Cronbach's α coefficient. The construct validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation (R) to test for correlations between the AKPS and VAS HSS, HSS patella score, VAS month, Oxford 12-item questionnaire and SF-36 subscales. Ceiling or floor effects are given in percentage of patients giving a maximum or minimum score.

RESULTS

The internal reliability of the AKPS is acceptable with a Cronbach's α of 0.81 in patients after TKA or UKA. A high correlation was found between the AKPS and the Oxford 12-item questionnaire (R = 0.81). Moderate correlations were found with the VAS month (R = 0.63), HSS patella score (R = 0.51) and SF-36 subscales physical functioning (R = 0.59), role-physical (R = 0.59), bodily pain (R = 0.57). Other correlations were poor, therefore indicating a good convergent and divergent validity. Ceiling effects were observed for the HSS patella score (31 %), VAS HSS (51 %), VAS pain (19 %), SF36-RP (46 %), SF36-RE (80 %) and SF36-BP (24 %). No ceiling or floor effect was found for the AKPS, Oxford 12-item and the other SF36 domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The AKPS appears to be reliable and valid in patients after knee arthroplasty, with no ceiling and floor effects, and can be used to assess anterior knee pain in patient who underwent joint replacement surgery.

The contemporary management of anterior knee pain and patellofemoral instability

In this review the evidence for the management of patients with patellofemoral disorders is presented confined to anterior knee pain and patellar dislocation (excluding patellofemoral arthritis). Patients present along a spectrum of these two problems and are best managed with both problems considered. The key to managing these patients is by improving muscle function, the patient losing weight (if overweight), and judicious use of analgesics if pain is an important feature. Hypermobility syndrome should always be looked for since this is a prognostic indicator for a poor operative outcome. Operations should be reserved for those with correctable anatomical abnormalities that have failed conservative therapy. The current dominant operation is a medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Construct validity of the FOCUS© (Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six): a communicative participation outcome measure for preschool children

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish the construct validity of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS©). This measure is reflective of concepts in the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health--Children and Youth framework. It was developed to capture 'real-world' changes (e.g. communicative participation) in preschoolers' communication following speech-language intervention.

METHOD

A pre-post design was used. Fifty-two parents of 3- to 6-year-old preschoolers attending speech-language therapy were included as participants. Speech-language therapists provided individual and/or group intervention to preschoolers. Intervention targeted: articulation/phonology, voice/resonance, expressive/receptive language, play, and use of augmentative devices. Construct validity for communicative participation was assessed using pre-intervention and post-intervention parent interviews using the FOCUS© and the communication and socialization domains of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II (VABS-II).

RESULTS

Significant associations were found between the FOCUS©, measuring communicative participation, and the VABS-II domains for: (i) pre-intervention scores in communication (r = 0.53, P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.30-0.70) and socialization (r = 0.67, P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.48-0.80); (ii) change scores over-time in communication (r = 0.45, P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.201-0.65) and socialization (r = 0.39, P = 0.002; 95% CI 0.13-0.60); and (iii) scores at post-intervention for communication (r = 0.53, P < 0.001; 95% CI 0.30-0.70) and for socialization (r = 0.37, P = 0.003; 95% CI 0.11-0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

The study provided evidence on construct validity of the FOCUS© for evaluating real-world changes in communication. We believe that the FOCUS© is a useful measure of communicative participation.

Chinese adaptation and validation of the patellofemoral pain severity scale

Objective:

This study validated the Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale translated into Chinese.

Design and setting:

The Chinese Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale was translated from the original English version following standard forward and backward translation procedures recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. The survey was then conducted in clinical settings by a questionnaire comprising the Chinese Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale, Kujala Scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index.

Subjects:

Eighty-four Chinese reading patients with patellofemoral pain were recruited from physical therapy clinics.

Main measures:

Internal consistency of the translated instrument was measured by Cronbach alpha. Convergent validity was examined by Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rho) tests by comparing its score with the validated Chinese version of the Kujala Scale and the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index while the test–retest reliability was evaluated by administering the questionnaires twice.

Results:

Cronbach alpha values of individual questions and their overall value were above 0.85. Strong association was found between the Chinese Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale and the Kujala Scale (rho = -0.72, p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was also found between Chinese Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale with the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index (rho = 0.63, p < 0.001). Excellent test–retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98) was demonstrated.

Conclusions:

The Chinese translated version of the Patellofemoral Pain Severity Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for patients with patellofemoral pain.