The Lexington addicts, 1971-1972: demographic characteristics, drug use patterns, and selected infectious disease experience

Drug-induced gynecomastia

Drugs account for about 20% of gynecomastia cases in men. As a number of factors can alter the estrogen:androgen ratio, several pathophysiologic mechanisms are associated with drugs causing this disorder. Antiandrogens, protease inhibitors, and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are the most common drug causes of gynecomastia, whereas first-generation antipsychotics, spironolactone, verapamil, and cimetidine are less common causes. Other drugs have been reported rarely as causes. Treatment may involve switching to an alternative agent or may require surgery or irradiation if the causative agent cannot be discontinued. We reviewed the literature on drug-induced gynecomastia and provided another perspective by reviewing data from the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System. Epidemiologic studies are needed to provide a more accurate description of the frequency of drug-induced gynecomastia.

Concurrent Alcohol and Cocaine Dependence Impact on Physical Health Among PsychiatricPatients

The aim of this study was to examine the association between active, concomitant cocaine and alcohol dependence and the prevalence and patterns of comorbid physical disorders in a sample of substance abusing hospitalized psychiatric patients. Three groups of patients (concomitant cocaine and alcohol dependence (AD + CD) (N = 38), alcohol dependence (AD) only (N = 38), and cocaine dependence (CD) only (N = 25)) consecutively admitted to a psychiatric-substance abuse dual diagnosis unit were comparatively examined for the frequency of comorbid physical disorders diagnoses, including viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and on liver function tests and electrocardiographic abnormalities. The results indicated that the concomitant alcohol and cocaine dependence group had higher rates of multiple physical disorders and also of multiple hepatitis infections than either the alcohol-only or the cocaine-only groups.

Microbial infections, immunomodulation, and drugs of abuse

The use of recreational drugs of abuse has generated serious health concerns. There is a long-recognized relationship between addictive drugs and increased levels of infections. Studies of the mechanisms of actions of these drugs became more urgent with the advent of AIDS and its correlation with abused substances. The nature and mechanisms of immunomodulation by marijuana, opiates, cocaine, nicotine, and alcohol are described in this review. Recent studies of the effects of opiates or marijuana on the immune system have demonstrated that they are receptor mediated, occurring both directly via specific receptors on immune cells and indirectly through similar receptors on cells of the nervous system. Findings are also discussed that demonstrate that cocaine and nicotine have similar immunomodulatory effects, which are also apparently receptor mediated. Finally, the nature and mechanisms of immunomodulation by alcohol are described. Although no specific alcohol receptors have been identified, it is widely recognized that alcohol enhances susceptibility to opportunistic microbes. The review covers recent studies of the effects of these drugs on immunity and on increased susceptibility to infectious diseases, including AIDS.

Opioids, immunology, and host defenses of intravenous drug abusers

Overall, it is apparent that opioids do affect host defense mechanisms. Heroin users present with an altered and functionally impaired immune system and have a higher prevalence of infectious diseases than do nonaddicts. Individuals exposed to opioid treatment for pain management during surgical procedures or maintained on oral methadone for treatment of drug addiction show either no effect or a suppressed immune system, depending on dosage and, in the case of methadone-maintained patients, duration of drug treatment. Confounding factors in these studies undermine definitive conclusions about the mechanisms by which opioids induce their immunomodulatory effects. Animal models have provided the means by which investigators can study the effects of opioids in a complex, biologic system that is easily manipulated and controlled. Findings from these studies have confirmed human data associating a pathogenic susceptibility with opioid use. Animal models have shown the complexity of this association. Interaction of the CNS, the autonomic nervous system, and the HPA axis is required for the varied effects of opioids on the immune system. By implication, exogenous opioids may be mimicking pathways by which endogenous opioids are involved in regulating immune defenses. To minimize the increased incidence of infectious diseases in heroin users and individuals clinically exposed to opioids, it will be important to determine the individual and collective effects of the opioid-induced activation of these pathways and the consequences of that activation to the immune system.

Lifetime complications of drug use in intravenous drug users

Ninety-two intravenous drug users (IVDUs) were identified from a study of 1,640 relatives of treated alcoholics and felons. Nearly all of the IVDUs (90%) reported a lifetime history of some degree of physical, psychological, or social difficulty related to drug abuse, but only 35% had ever received treatment for drug abuse. Overall, compared to subjects with a history of substantial illicit drug use who had never injected, IVDUs were significantly more likely to report all drug-related problems assessed. Even in populations of drug users not selected through treatment, any history of intravenous (IV) drug use is strongly indicative of a lifetime occurrence of complications of drug use.

Safety and side-effects of buprenorphine in the clinical management of heroin addiction

Sublingual buprenorphine (8 mg) was administered to heroin-dependent addicts daily for 18 days and continued from day 19-day 36 either daily or on alternate days. Final data are reported on 18 subjects. The number of self-reported symptoms reviewed as potential adverse drug reactions ranged from 1 to 88 per participant. None was considered to be related definitely to the study medication, and there were no reporting differences between the two dosing regimens. Forty-five reactions were considered probably related to buprenorphine: sedation/drowsiness (three reports) and constipation (42 reports). It was concluded that these were anticipated drug effects rather than adverse reactions. Although some participants showed increases in serum aminotransferase levels, those increases could not be directly attributed to buprenorphine. We conclude that buprenorphine was well tolerated, but further study is needed in this population to delineate the possible attributable risk of the drug to hepatic dysfunction in this population.