First metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis: evaluation of plate and screw fixation

ACFAS Clinical Consensus Statements: Hallux Rigidus

The following are clinical consensus statements (CCS) on the topic of hallux rigidus sponsored by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. A core panel synthesized the data and divided the topic in to twelve sections, each section contained a variable number of consensus statements, based upon complexity. Overall there were 24 consensus statements synthesized for this subject matter. The 24 statements were provided to the expert panel with all available evidence to come to a consensus utilizing all available evidence.

Minimally invasive Dorsal cheilectomy and Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthroscopy for the treatment of Hallux Rigidus

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy (MIDC) has become a popular alternative to an open approach for treating Hallux Rigidus (HR). To reduce some of the complications related to the MIDC approach, a first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthroscopy can be performed in addition to address the intra-articular pathology associated with Hallux Rigidus. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of MIDC with first MTP arthroscopy in patients with HR with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective review for adult patients with Coughlin and Shurnass Grade 0-3 who were treated with MIDC and first MTP arthroscopy between 3/1/2020 and 8/1/2022, with at least one year of follow-up data. Demographic information, first MTP range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and EQ-5D-5 L scores were collected. Continuous data was expressed as a mean and standard deviation, categorical data was expressed as a percentage. Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare continuous variables. All P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were included in the study. Average follow-up time was 16.5 months (range: 12 to 26.2). There was 1 (3.2%) undersurface EHL tendon tear, 2 (6.5%) conversions to an MTP fusion, and 1 (3.2%) revision cheilectomy and capsular release for MTP joint contracture. There was a significant improvement in patient's ROM in dorsiflexion (50 vs 89.6 degrees, P = 0.002), postoperative VAS pain scores (6.4 vs 2.1, P < 0.001), MOXFQ pain scores (58.1 vs 30.7, P = 0.001), MOXFQ Walking/Standing scores (56.6 vs 20.6, P = 0.001), MOXFQ Social Interaction scores (47.3 vs 19.36, P = 0.002), and MOXFQ Index scores (54.7 vs 22.4, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found that MIDC with first MTP arthroscopy was effective at improving patient-reported outcomes at one year with low complication and revision rates. These results suggest that MIDC with first MTP arthroscopy is an effective treatment for early-stage HR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Nonunion After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: The Association With Shoe Size

INTRODUCTION

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is a common treatment for various foot conditions, with nonunion as a frequent complication. The incidence of nonunion varies widely in the literature. In particular, males have a higher risk of nonunion than females. This is possibly due to biomechanical and anatomical differences, as men have on average larger feet than women. This study therefore aims to explore whether shoe size, as a proxy for foot size, affects nonunion rates and could explain the gender disparity in nonunion rates.

METHODOLOGY

An exploratory analysis of retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary first MTPJ arthrodesis in a single secondary hospital between January 2012 and December 2019. Additional data on body weight, height, and shoe size were prospectively collected from patients.

RESULTS

Among 261 included patients, 57 (21.8%) experienced nonunion. Nonunion incidence was higher in males (18, 26.9%) than in females (39, 20.1%). Self-reported shoe size showed no significant association with nonunion in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

DISCUSSION

The study's findings suggest that shoe size, as a proxy for foot size, is not associated with nonunion after the first MTPJ arthrodesis. Despite observing a gender difference in nonunion rates, this disparity could not be explained by shoe size.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoe size as a proxy for foot size appears to have no clinical association with nonunion following the first MTPJ arthrodesis.

A Novel Plating System for First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Hybrid and Traditional Locking Plate Constructs

BACKGROUND

Dorsal plate fixation is commonly used for first metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) arthrodesis and plate design continues to evolve. A new staple compression plate (SCP) design attempts to utilize the continuous compression of a nitinol staple across the fusion site while simultaneously providing the stability of a dorsal locked plate. Herein, we compare the radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes of 1st MTPJ joint arthrodesis using 2 dorsal locking plate constructs including a novel SCP construct.

METHODS

Forty-four patients who underwent 1st MTPJ arthrodesis between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. There were 2 group cohorts. Group 1 cohort included 23 patients who received a CrossRoads Extremity SCP, and Group 2 cohort included 21 patients who received a Stryker dorsal locking precontoured titanium plate (LPP). All patients were evaluated with radiographs, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) outcome scores, and Foot Function Index (FFI).

RESULTS

The complication and union rates did not vary between groups with a fusion rate of 95.7% in the SCP group and 90.5 % in the LPP group. Similarly, we found no significant differences in PROMIS or FFI scores between the SCP and LPP plates.

CONCLUSION

Use of either dorsal locking plate construct for 1st MTPJ arthrodesis was associated with high union rates and comparable functional outcomes. As locked plate technology continues to evolve for 1st MTPJ arthrodesis, it is important that clinical outcomes are reported.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Analysis of the Costs and Complications of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Comparing Locked and Non-locked Plate Fixation Constructs

BACKGROUND

The ideal fixation method for the first metatarsophalangeal joint (first MTP) remains uncertain. This study compares nonunion and revision surgery rates of first MTP arthrodesis between nonlocking semitubular plates and precontoured locking plates.

METHODS

Demographics, fixation technique, and complications of all patients who underwent primary first MTP arthrodesis between 2013 and 2018 were determined from radiographs and clinical records. Cost data were from a 1-year subset of isolated first MTP fusion surgeries. The primary outcome measures of this study were the nonunion and complication rates, with associated costs of patients undergoing first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with either a noncontoured semitubular plate or a precontoured locking plate.

RESULTS

The study included 189 patients, with a mean follow-up of 18.7 months. The overall nonunion rate was 10.1%, with no difference between the locking and nonlocking plates. The prevalence of a painful implant was also similar. Surgeries using locking plates cost an average of $1,500 more than those using nonlocked plates.

CONCLUSIONS

Because there was no difference in revision between locking and nonlocking plate fixation for primary first MTP arthrodesis, routine use of the more expensive locking plates may not be justified.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Retrospective cohort study).

"In Situ" Joint Preparation Technique for First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparative Review of 388 Cases

"Cup-shaped power reamers" and "flat cuts" (FC) are common joint preparation techniques in first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis. However, the third option of an "in situ" (IS) technique has rarely been studied. This study aims to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of the IS technique for various MTP pathologies with other MTP joint preparation techniques. A single-center retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent primary MTP joint arthrodesis between 2015 and 2019. In total, 388 cases were included in the study. We found higher nonunion rates in the IS group (11.1% vs 4.6%, p = .016). However, the revision rates were similar between the groups (7.1% vs 6.5%, p = .809). Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus was associated with significantly higher overall complication rates (p < .001). The FC technique was associated with transfer metatarsalgia (p = .015) and a more first ray shortening (p < .001). Visual analog scale, PROMIS-10 physical, and PROMIS-CAT physical scores significantly improved in IS and FC groups (p < .001, p = .002, p = .001, respectively). The improvement was comparable between the joint preparation techniques (p = .806). In conclusion, the IS joint preparation technique is simple and effective for first MTP joint arthrodesis. In our series, the IS technique had a higher radiographic nonunion rate that did not correlate with a higher revision rate, and otherwise similar complication profile to the FC technique while providing similar PROMs. The IS technique resulted in significantly less first ray shortening when compared to the FC technique.

Republication of "First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Functional Outcomes Using 2 Different Fixation Techniques. Is More Expensive Better?"

Background

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis can be fixed using either a dorsal plate or crossed screws. However, there is considerable difference in the cost of these implants, and it is not known if there is sufficient difference in outcome that might justify this cost difference. Our aim was to compare the functional results and patient satisfaction rates after first MTP joint arthrodesis in a group of patients using the same surgical technique except for the fixation devices.

Methods

A prospective cohort of 27 patients who underwent first MTP joint fusion by the same surgeon using 2 crossed screws or a single screw with a dorsal plate was recruited over a 3-year period. Demographic information, patient satisfaction rates, complications, and union rates were evaluated. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scoring systems were used pre- and postoperatively to compare the functional outcomes. Thirty consecutive procedures (screws, n = 15; plate, n = 15) were performed. Age (55.8 ± 11.1 vs 63.3 ± 12.4 years for screws and plate respectively; P = .091) and female gender percentages (80% and 73%, P = .666) were similar between groups.

Results

The overall union rate was 93% with no differences between groups. AOFAS and VAS scores improved significantly postoperatively for each technique, and no differences were found between the two in the improvement in AOFAS (42.4 ± 8.0 vs 44.3 ± 8.2, screws and plate respectively; P = .520) and VAS scores (66.0 ± 5.4 vs 69.0 ± 6.9;P = .195). The implant cost for screws was $40 and for dorsal plate, $328.

Conclusions

First MTP joint fusion using either screws or plate fixation results in an improvement in AOFAS and VAS scores. Functional improvement and patient satisfaction did not differ between the 2 techniques, despite a considerable difference in cost between the two methods of fixation.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prospective comparative study.

Republication of "Current Concepts Review: Hallux Rigidus"

Arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, hallux rigid, is a common and disabling source of foot pain in the adult population. Hallux rigidus is characterized by diseased cartilage and large, periarticular osteophytes that result in a stiff, painful joint. Activity modification, sensible shoes, orthotics, anti-inflammatory medications and occasional intra-articular steroid injections can be attempted to alleviate the discomfort associated with hallux rigidus. A number of surgical options exist for the treatment of recalcitrant hallux rigidus. Cheilectomy is a useful treatment for dorsal impingement pain seen in mild hallux rigidus. A new polyvinyl alcohol hemi-arthroplasty implant has shown promising early and midterm results in the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus; however, arthrodesis of the first MTP joint remains the gold standard treatment for advanced hallux rigidus because of unpredictable outcomes after early-generation joint replacement implants.

High complication rates following revision first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: a retrospective analysis of 79 cases

BACKGROUND

The most common indications for revision of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis are symptomatic failures of prior arthrodesis, failed hallux valgus correction, and failed MTPJ arthroplasty implants. However, the outcomes of revision MTPJ arthrodesis have rarely been studied. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of revision MTPJ arthrodesis following different primary procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of revision MTPJ arthrodesis cases between January 2015 and December 2019 was performed. The radiographic results, patient-reported outcomes, and rates of complications, subsequent revisions, and nonunions, were analyzed and compared preoperatively and postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was utilized to determine risk factors for complications and reoperations.

RESULTS

This study yielded a total of 79 cases of revision MTPJ arthrodesis. The mean follow-up time was 365 days (SD ± 295). The overall complication rate was 40.5%, of which the overall nonunion rate was 19.0%. Seven cases (8.9%) required further revision surgery. The multivariate analysis revealed that Diabetes mellitus was associated with significantly higher overall complication rates (p = 0.016), and nonunion was associated with "in-situ" joint preparation techniques (p = 0.042). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) significantly improved postoperatively (p < 0.001); However, PROMIS-10 physical health and PROMIS-10 mental health did not change significantly during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of MTPJ surgery failures is a clinical challenge in orthopedic surgery. In our study, revision of first MTPJ surgery resulted in higher nonunion rates and overall complication rates compared to typical outcomes from primary MTPJ arthrodesis. Diabetes, Tobacco use, and "in-situ" joint preparation technique were found to be independent risk factors for complications and reoperations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-Retrospective Cohort Study.

Validation of the Artificial Floor Technique in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Patient function after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) relies on proper positioning of the first MTPJ. To maximize the likelihood of good postoperative function, the dorsiflexion angle, referred to as the fusion sagittal angle, should range between 20° and 30°, corresponding to 10° to 15° of dorsiflexion off the weightbearing axis. However, achieving appropriate sagittal alignment intraoperatively is challenging. The artificial floor technique (AFT) uses a rigid, flat surface to simulate the weightbearing position of the foot intraoperatively to accurately position the first MTPJ without fluoroscopy. This technique has been previously described and is commonly used but, to our knowledge, it has never been validated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the AFT a valid and repeatable technique for positioning the fusion sagittal angle between 20° and 30° of dorsiflexion from the first metatarsal? (2) Does the fusion sagittal angle obtained using the AFT vary with foot size?

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a search was performed using Current Procedural Terminology codes for patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis by one surgeon between June 2012 and June 2020. The surgical technique used during this time did not vary and consisted of the use of a rigid, flat, sterile surface. The entire foot was placed flat on the surface, simulating the weightbearing position and allowing for an evaluation of the fusion sagittal angle of the first MTPJ. The target sagittal alignment was achieved when the soft tissue of the plantar surface at the distal-most aspect of the proximal phalanx was measured (using a sterile ruler) as 1 cm off the artificial floor. The recommended fusion sagittal angle falls within a range of 20° to 30°, which allows for 1-mm to 2-mm variations in measuring the elevation of the proximal phalanx off the artificial floor. Fixation was achieved with two 2.8-mm threaded, double-pointed Steinmann pins placed through the intramedullary canal of the proximal and distal phalanges and into the first metatarsal. Once fixation was achieved, the fusion sagittal angle was confirmed with the AFT without using fluoroscopy. Postoperatively, patients were allowed to bear weight fully on their heels in a postoperative, rigid-soled shoe. During the study period, 117 patients (135 feet) underwent first MTPJ arthrodesis utilizing the AFT for either first MTPJ arthritis/hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or inflammatory arthropathy. Of those, we considered patients with preoperative AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs and patients with AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs at 3 months postoperatively after the removal of the internal fixation construct as eligible for analysis. Based on these criteria, 84% (113 of 135) of feet were included in the final radiographic analysis. Sixteen percent (22 of 135) of the feet were excluded because postoperative radiographs demonstrating the removal of the internal fixation construct were absent from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in these cases. The length of the whole foot, first metatarsal, and proximal phalanx were measured on preoperative weightbearing radiographs. In addition, fusion sagittal angles were measured on weightbearing radiographs after removal of internal fixation construct at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively (mean 3.5 ± 2.2 months). No patients were lost to follow-up before obtaining those radiographs. Two qualified reviewers independently evaluated each radiograph. We ascertained inter- and intraobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). We determined whether the fusion sagittal angle obtained using the AFT varied with foot size by using a multiple linear regression model.

RESULTS

In the entire study group, the mean fusion sagittal angle using the AFT was 27° ± 4°. The interobserver ICC of the fusion sagittal angle measurements was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.97; p < 0.001). The intraobserver ICC for reviewer 1 was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97; p < 0.001) and the intraobserver ICC for reviewer 2 was 0.97 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.98; p < 0.001). Ninety-one percent (103 of 113) of the study group fell within the acceptable range of 20° to 30° ± 2°. The multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that the preoperative lengths of the whole foot (β =-0.05 [95% CI -0.12 to 0.02]; p = 0.16), proximal phalanx (β =-0.13 [95% CI -0.46 to 0.20]; p = 0.44), and first metatarsal (β = 0.13 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.35]; p = 0.27) were not independently associated with the postoperative fusion sagittal angle.

CONCLUSION

The AFT allows for accurate and reproducible positioning of the first MTPJ within the appropriate functional range of dorsiflexion, regardless of foot size. Additionally, this technique can be performed without fluoroscopy and so avoids radiation exposure to the patient and the surgical team.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Unterschiede in der Therapie entzündlich rheumatischer und degenerativer Füße. Die Vorfußchirurgie

Der Unterschied zwischen rheumatischen und degenerativen Veränderungen am Fuß liegt in der fortschreitenden Destruktion der Gelenke bei persistierender Synovialitis der rheumatoiden Arthritis (RA). Unter der heute wirksameren immunsuppressiven Therapie und eines frühen und aggressiven Beginns zeigen sich mildere Verlaufsformen. So können zunehmend auch gelenkerhaltende Verfahren der Vorfußchirurgie Anwendung finden. Entscheidend ist hier jedoch die Remission mit sicherer Krankheitskontrolle für den gelenkerhaltenden Eingriff. Dennoch ist das Rezidiv- und Fehlstellungsrisiko aufgrund wiederkehrender arthritischer Phasen höher. Rheumaorthopädische Standardverfahren, wie die Arthrodese des Großzehengrundgelenkes mit Resektion der Metatarsaleköpfchen haben aber Ihren Stellenwert beim Vollbild des erosiven rheumatischen Vorfußes nicht verloren. Ein standardisiertes Vorgehen fehlt. Umso wichtiger ist es, mit jedem Patienten individuell die richtigen Maßnahmen zu festzulegen.

High Utility of the 1st Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Fusion

Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint has been used by foot and ankle surgeons as a reproducible and useful means of treating end-stage arthritis of the great toe. However, the overall utility and successful outcomes of this procedure have led to its incorporation into the treatment of more significant bunion deformities, reconstruction forefoot, and salvage procedures. The authors review surgical fixation methods, offer insightful technical pearls for challenging cases and share examples of complex reconstructive and salvage procedures.

Medially positioned plate in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis

Objective

The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare the stability of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint arthrodesis with dorsally and medially positioned plates.

Methods

A physical model of the MTP1 joint consists of printed synthetic bones, a titanium locking plate and screws. In the experiments, samples with dorsally and medially positioned plates were subjected to loading of ground load character in a universal testing machine. Force-displacement relations and relative displacements of bones were recorded. The obtained results were used to validate the corresponding finite element models of the MTP1 joint. Nonlinear finite element simulations of the toe-off phase of gait were performed to determine the deformation and stress state in the MTP1 joint for two positions of the plate.

Results

In numerical simulations, the maximum displacement in the dorsal direction was noticed at the tip of the distal phalanx and was equal to 19.6 mm for the dorsal plate and 9.63 mm for the medial plate for a resultant force of 150 N. Lower relative bone displacements and smaller plastic deformation in the plate were observed in the model with the medial plate. Stress values were also smaller in the medially positioned plate and locking screws compared to fixation with the dorsal plate.

Conclusions

A medially positioned locking plate provides better stability of the MTP1 joint than a dorsally positioned plate due to greater vertical bending stiffness of the medial plate. Smaller relative bone displacements observed in fixation with the medial plate may be beneficial for the bone healing process. Moreover, lower stress values may decrease the risk of complications associated with hardware failure.

Physical Function and Pain Interference Levels of Hallux Rigidus Patients Before and After Synthetic Cartilage Implant vs Arthrodesis Surgery

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus is a common and painful degenerative condition of the great toe limiting a patient's physical function and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate pre- and postoperative physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) levels of patients undergoing synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty (SCI) vs arthrodesis (AD) for treatment of hallux rigidus using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

METHODS

PROMIS PF and PI t scores were analyzed for patients who underwent either SCI or AD. Postoperative final PROMIS t scores were obtained via phone survey. Linear mixed model analysis was used to assess differences in PF and PI at each follow-up point. Final follow-up scores were analyzed using independent sample t tests.

RESULTS

Total 181 (59 SCI, 122 AD) operatively managed patients were included for analysis of PROMIS scores. Final phone survey was performed at a minimum of 14 (mean 33, range, 14-59) months postoperatively, with 101 patients (40 SCI, 61 AD) successfully contacted. The mean final follow-up was significantly different for SCI and AD: 27 vs 38 months, respectively (P < .01). The mean age of the SCI cohort was lower than the AD cohort (57.5 vs 61.5 years old, P = .01). Average PF t scores were higher in the SCI cohort at baseline (47.1 and 43.9, respectively, P = .01) and at final follow-up (51.4 vs 45.9, respectively, P < .01). A main effect of superior improvement in PF was noted in the SCI group (+4.3) vs the AD group (+2) across time intervals (P < .01). PI t scores were similar between the 2 procedures across time points.

CONCLUSION

The SCI cohort reported slightly superior PF t scores preoperatively and at most follow-up time points compared with the arthrodesis group. No differences were found for PI or complication rates between the 2 treatment groups during this study time frame.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

In this multicenter study, we evaluated commonly used methods of fixation and 2 methods of joint preparation for first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion, in terms of radiological union and revision rates. Included were 409 consecutive fusions in 385 patients. The overall union rate was 91.4% (34/409). About 29.4% (10/34) of our nonunions were symptomatic. Preoperative hallux valgus showed a statistically significant relation to nonunion (odds ratio [OR] = 9.33, p = .017). Other potential contributing factors like gender (OR 1.9, p = .44), diabetes (OR = 0, p = .99), steroid use (OR = 2.07, p = .44), inflammatory arthritis (OR = 0, p = .99), and smoking (OR = 2.69, p = .34) did not attain statistical significance. Further, the methods of fixation like solid screws (OR = 0, p = .99), plate (OR = 3.6, p = .187), or cannulated screws (OR = 0.09, p = .06) showed no correlation with incidence of nonunion. We compared 2 techniques of joint preparation and found no significant difference in union rates (chi-square = 1.0426, p = .30). Our crude comparison of costs showed the average saving to the trust per year could be 33,442.50£ by choosing screws over plates. To conclude, only hallux valgus had a statistically significant relation to nonunion. All other variables had no significant impact on the union. Solid screw seems to be economically the most viable option and a valid alternative.

Adverse events involving hallux metatarsophalangeal joint implants: Analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration data from 2010 to 2018

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is 1 in 40 people over the age of 50. Surgical treatment options for MTPJ arthritis include joint preservation, joint resurfacing, and arthrodesis. Hallux MTPJ implants have evolved over the past several decades, but are associated with various complications. The aim of this study was to examine the MAUDE database to determine reported adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was reviewed from 2010 to 2018 to review voluntary reported adverse event reports for approved implants within the United States. We recorded the type of adverse event and excluded duplicate reports and those extracted from already published literature.

RESULTS

Among 64 reported hallux MTPJ implant adverse events, the most common modes of adverse events were component loosening (34%), infection (14.1%), component fracture (9.4%), inflammation (9.4%), and allergic reaction (7.8%). Regarding implant type, Cartiva SCI had the highest percentage of adverse events (23.4%), followed by Arthrosurface ToeMotion (20.3%), Ascension MGT (12.5%), Arthrosurface HemiCAP® (10.9%), Futura primus (9.4%), and Osteomed Reflexion (6.3%). There was an increase in reported adverse events after 2016. The MAUDE database does not report the total incidence of implant insertion.

CONCLUSION

Our study of the MAUDE database demonstrated that component loosening and infection are the most common modes of adverse events for hallux MTPJ implants. Cartiva accounted for one-fourth of the implant-related adverse events during our study period, followed by ToeMotion, and Ascension MGT implants. Continued reporting of adverse events will improve our understanding on short and long-term complications of various hallux MTPJ implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Case Series from Large Database Analysis; Treatment Study.

First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis After Failed Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes after first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis for hallux rigidus between patients who underwent primary arthrodesis and those who had had a prior surgery for hallux valgus.

METHODS

Our design was a retrospective cohort study comparing 29 patients who underwent primary arthrodesis (primary group) and 34 patients with hallux rigidus after hallux valgus surgery (secondary group). The clinical assessment included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Radiological evaluation was also performed. Overall, the mean postoperative follow-up was 3.4 (range, 2-5) years.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, AOFAS and VAS pain scores significantly improved in both groups (P = .001). However, the mean AOFAS (P = .001) and VAS pain (P = .008) scores were significantly better in the primary group than in the secondary group. Radiologically, there were no significant differences between the groups in any angle after arthrodesis. Revision surgeries were not required in the primary group. In the secondary group, there was 1 revision due to deep infection, and 3 other patients required dorsal plate removal. Excluding plate removal, the Kaplan-Meier survival at 3 years was not significantly different between groups (P = .775).

CONCLUSION

Although arthrodesis of the first MTP joint was an effective procedure for hallux rigidus, the clinical outcomes in patients who had prior hallux valgus surgery were worse than those for patients who underwent primary surgery for hallux rigidus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of bilateral simultaneous hallux MTPJ fusion

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is a frequently performed surgical procedure. Many patients have bilateral hallux MTPJ pathology requiring bilateral arthrodesis. There are concerns that bilateral simultaneous hallux surgery, under one anaesthetic, results in the patient being severely incapacitated in the early post-operative period. We hypothesize that bilateral simultaneous hallux MTPJ fusions does not compromise outcomes or the patients' post-operative comfort and rehabilitation and is cost and time effective.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 16 patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous first MTPJ arthrodesis were compared to 16 patients who had unilateral MTPJ arthrodesis with regards to outcome, tolerance, cost and time effectiveness. Outcome measures were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle questionnaire (SEFAS).

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the AOFAS scores post surgery in the bilateral group and according to the SEFAS grading, 14 patients (87.5%) had good or excellent outcome scores with 13 (81.25%) of these patients having excellent scores. This was comparable to the outcome scores in the unilateral group. Two patients developed non-unions bilaterally compared to one in the unilateral group. There is also a notable general cost saving and less time off work when bilateral fusions are done at the same setting.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral simultaneous hallux MTPJ arthrodesis is an effective, convenient and cost effective option for patients requiring MTPJ fusions for bilateral hallux pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Revision surgeries for failed hallux valgus correction: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Failure of hallux valgus (HV) correction is not uncommon, and its management can be challenging. The available literature is not exhaustive. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the current evidence on the role of revision surgery for failed HV correction, including clinical presentation, indications, surgical strategies and outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Scopus online databases were accessed in November 2020. All the clinical studies on revision for failed HV correction were analysed, and only studies reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

Data from 20 studies (586 procedures) were retrieved. The HV angle, the intermetatarsal angle and the distal metatarsal articular angle were reduced of 17.8° (P < 0.001), 3.3° (P = 0.05) and 7.3° (P < 0.001) respectively. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score improved of 24.7% (P < 0.001). The visual analogue scale improved by 40.8% (P < 0.001). Dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the first metatarso-phalangeal joint remained similar to their preoperative values (P = 0.2 and P = 0.4, respectively). After revision surgery the following complications were further detected: recurrences 5.1% (30 of 586 patients), non-unions 4.1% (24/586), additional surgical procedures 8.7% (51 of 586 patients).

CONCLUSION

Revision surgery for failed primary HV correction can yield satisfying results. Accurate preoperative planning is necessary to try and identify the causes of failure, and address them appropriately.

Minimally Invasive Dorsal Cheilectomy and Hallux Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

Background:

Hallux rigidus (HR) is a common source of forefoot pain and disability. For those who fail nonoperative treatment, minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy (MIDC) is an increasingly popular alternative to the open approach with early positive results. Early failures may be due to lose bone debris from the MIDC as well as other intra-articular pathology that cannot be addressed with MIDC alone. Metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthroscopy can be used in addition to MIDC to assess the joint after MIDC and address any intra-articular pathology while still maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. We report our clinical outcomes following MIDC combined with MTP arthroscopy.

Methods:

From November 2017 to July 2020, a retrospective analysis of all MIDC cheilectomies with MTP arthroscopy performed by the 2 senior authors was done. Wound complications, infections, revision rates, need for future surgery, conversion to fusion rates, pre- and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, time to return to normal shoe, intraoperative arthroscopic findings, and operative time were collected. Follow-up average was 16.5 months (range 3-33 months).

Results:

A total of 20 patients were included with an average follow-up of 16.5 months. The average VAS score improved from 7.05 preoperatively to 0.75 postoperatively ( P < .05). Average range of motion in dorsiflexion increased from 32 to 48 degrees ( P < .05) and plantarflexion increased from 15 to 19 degrees plantarflexion ( P < .05). All patients were weightbearing as tolerated immediately after surgery in a postoperative shoe and transitioned to a regular shoe at average of 2.1 weeks. We had no wound infections, wound complications, revision surgeries, tendon injuries or nerve damage. One patient required conversion to a fusion 3 years after the index procedure. Average tourniquet time was 30.39 minutes (range 17-60 minutes) and total average operating room time was 59.7 minutes (range 40-87 minutes). On arthroscopic evaluation of the MTP joint after MIDC, 100% of patients had bone debris, 100% had synovitis, 10% had loose bodies, and 30% had large cartilage flaps within the joint.

Conclusion:

MIDC and first MTP joint arthroscopy for treatment of hallux rigidus provide improved pain relief with minimal complications while still maintaining the benefits touted for minimally invasive operative procedures. Additionally, we have shown a high rate of intra-articular debris along with intra-articular pathology such as synovitis, loose chondral flaps, and loose bodies that exist after MIDC. This combined procedure has the potential for improving patient outcomes and may minimize risk of future revision surgeries compared with MIDC alone.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, case series study.

Treatment of hallux rigidus by a novel bi-phasic aragonite-based implant: results of a two year multi-centre clinical trial

PURPOSE

The two year results of a multi-centre clinical trial were examined to evaluate surgical treatment of hallux rigidus using a novel, bi-phasic, biodegradable, and cell-free aragonite-based scaffold (Agili-C™, CartiHeal Ltd, Israel).

METHODS

Twenty patients with moderate-to-severe hallux rigidus were recruited. After thorough metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ-1) debridement, the scaffolds were implanted into the defect centre. Eight patients received concomitant osteotomy. Treatment outcome was followed clinically (Pain VAS, FAAM-ADL, FAAM-Sport, AOFAS-HMIS, maximum active range of extension ROM-EXT, and flexion ROM-FLEX), and by medical imaging, at six month intervals for two years. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study follow-up period.

RESULTS

Significant clinical improvement over time was observed in all evaluated parameters (screening to final evaluation averages: Pain VAS 59 to 26, FAAM-ADL 57 to 77, FAAM-Sport 39 to 66, AOFAS-HMIS 51 to 81, ROM-EXT 18° to 36°), except for ROM-FLEX. Radiographs showed stable MTPJ-1 width over the two years in 17/18 cases (94%). MRI demonstrated progressive implant biodegradation, coupled with articular cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration, with a repair tissue defect fill of 75-100% in 14/17 (82%) subjects at their final visit. Revision surgery with implant removal was performed in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Bi-phasic, osteochondral, biodegradable, aragonite-based scaffold demonstrated positive clinical outcome and a good safety profile in the treatment of medium-to-advanced hallux rigidus. According to the medical imaging, this implant has the potential to restore the entire osteochondral unit of metatarsal head.

Does the IOFix implant improve union rates?

BACKGROUND

First metatarso-phalangeal joint fusion is the current gold standard for severe hallux rigidus. Data regarding the union rate and the re-operation rate when IOFix (an Intra-osseous fixation device, Extremity medical, New Jersey, USA) is used for hallux rigidus fusion is limited but promising. The aim of this study was to review our outcomes with the IOFix implant.

METHODS

We have conducted a retrospective chart review, following the approval of the hospital IRB committee. Exclusion criteria included bilateral operations on the same patient, multiple surgeries, charcot foot or other structural foot abnormalities (except hallux valgus), rheumatoid arthritis and a recent foot trauma. We collected demographic data, physical examination documentation, functional score evaluations (AOFAS), and Plain radiographic studies.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.36 ± 9.12 (range 36 to 77) years, 18 (60%) female patients and 12 (40%) male. Fourteen (53.33%) were left side pathologies. The average follow up period was 36.2 ± 12.31 (range 12 to 54) months. Union was obtained in 28 (93.33%) patients, of whom none had requested a hardware removal due to a prominent hardware during a minimum of 2 year follow up period. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 80.5 ± 10.87 (range 35 to 90). A more stringent inclusion criteria and fusion definitions would have led to an exclusion of two more patients and a dropout of two patients from the "fused" group, which would have led to a fusion rate of 85.71%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series of hallux rigidus patients that were operated with an IOFix device. The rates of fusion and hardware removal in MTPJ1 arthrodesis performed with an IOFix implant were found to be similar at most when compared to previously described rates that were obtained with other cheaper and more simple fixation devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Cost Comparison of Synthetic Hydrogel Implant and First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

Background. First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis is the "gold standard" treatment for hallux rigidus. Recently, there has been increased interest in new synthetic cartilage implants to preserve joint motion while eradicating pain. With current health care economics, the cost of a treatment is gaining particular importance. This study set out to perform a cost comparison between MTP arthrodesis and synthetic hydrogel implant to determine which treatment modality is more cost-effective based on direct aggregate costs. Study design. Economic and decision analysis. Methods. Studies in the available literature were analyzed to estimate hardware removal rates for MTP fusion and failure rates for a synthetic hydrogel implant and MTP fusion. Costs were determined by examining direct costs at a single institution for implants and data reported in the literature for operating room time. Sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were performed to examine cost and measurement uncertainty. Results. Assuming a 4.76% MTP arthrodesis revision rate and 7.06% hardware removal rate, the total direct cost of MTP joint arthrodesis was $3632. Using a 9.2% failure rate with subsequent conversion to MTP arthrodesis, the total cost of synthetic hydrogel implant was $4565. Sensitivity analysis revealed that MTP fusion was more cost-effective even if the failure rate increased to 15% and synthetic hydrogel implant failure rate was 0%. The synthetic cartilage implant cost would have to be reduced 28% or approximately 200% the cost of MTP fusion implants to be comparable to MTP arthrodesis. Conclusion. Hallux rigidus treatment with a synthetic hydrogel implant resulted in a higher direct aggregate cost than MTP arthrodesis.Level of Evidence: Level II: Cost analysis.

Is adjunction of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) useful in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis? A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

First metatarsophalangeal (MTPJ1) fusion represents the gold standard treatment for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR). The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of A-PRF in promoting union after MTPJ1 arthrodesis. Our hypothesis was that the use of A-PRF may reduce the non-union rate and the time to fusion in the treatment of HR.

METHODS

14 patients that had undergone MTPJ1 arthrodesis with A-PRF adjunction with 21 standard MTPJ1 fusions were retrospectively reviewed. The fusion rate and time to fusion (clinically and radiographically) were assessed at 6, 12 weeks and at the longest follow-up; the clinical status at final follow-up through forefoot AOFAS, EQ5d, SEFAS and VAS-pain scores; the complication rate.

RESULTS

At 6-weeks, bony union was achieved in 100% of patients in the A-PRF group compared to 70% in the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.22). At final follow-up (41 months), union rate in the control group reached 92% (one non-union). AOFAS, VAS and EQ-5d scores showed similar results for the two groups (p=0.86, p=0.12 and p=0.61, respectively); only SEFAS score revealed a difference favoring the A-PRF group (p=0.04). No revision surgery or complication was recorded in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

A tendency for increased union rate was mainly found at 6 weeks in patients treated with MTPJ1 fusion associated to A-PRF compared to isolated fusion. The use of A-PRF was not associated with an increased complication rate at final follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, therapeutic study, retrospective comparative study.

Biomechanical Comparison of Low-Profile Contoured Locking Plate With Single Compression Screw to Fully Threaded Compression Screws for First MTP Fusion

BACKGROUND

Open metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis using locked plates produces good clinical outcomes. However, arthroscopic fusion with new-generation fully threaded compression screws is emerging as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare low-profile contoured locked plates with fully threaded compression screws for first MTP fusion, in a biomechanical cadaveric model.

METHODS

The first rays of 8 matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric feet underwent dissection and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning to measure bone mineral density (BMD). The "plate" group was prepared with cup-and-cone reamers, and fixation of the MTP joint with 1 compression screw and low-profile dorsal locked plate. The matched-pair "screws" group was prepared through a simulated arthroscopic technique, achieving fixation with 2 new-generation fully threaded compression screws. The plantar MTP gap was recorded with an extensometer during 250 000 90-N cyclic loads followed by a single load to failure.

RESULTS

The screw group demonstrated significantly greater stiffness, 31.6 N/mm (plates) and 51.7 N/mm (screws) (P = .0045). There was no significant difference in plantar gapping or load to failure, 198.6 N (plates) and 290.1 N (screws) (P = .2226). Stiffness and load to failure were highly correlated to BMD for the screw group, r =0.79 and r = 0.94, respectively, but less so for the plate group, r = 0.36 and r = 0.62, respectively. The maximum metatarsal head height measured on the lateral view was strongly correlated with load to failure for both the plate- and screw-only groups (r > 0.9).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that hallux MTP arthrodesis utilizing fully threaded compression screws had similar plantar gapping and load to failure when compared with the low-profile locking plate, but with significantly more stiffness. These results support an increased role of fully threaded screws for MTP arthrodesis using either the arthroscopic or open technique. However, with decreased BMD plate fixation may remain the better fixation choice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our data suggest that with regard to construct stability, fully threaded headless compression screws may be just as effective as low-profile locking plates, but BMD and MTP joint fluoroscopic measurements should be considered in the decision-making process for fixation.

First metatarsophalangeal fusion using joint specific dorsal plate with interfragmentary screw augmentation: Clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study reports the outcome of a plating system for arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) that incorporates a lag compression screw within a low profile titanium plate with a predetermined contour. This is the first report of the outcomes of this implant from a non-affiliated centre.

PATIENT AND METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of 40 consecutive primary 1st MTPJ arthrodesis procedures. The mean age of the cohort was 56 years (range, 20-74 years). The diagnosis was hallux rigidus in 31 patients and inflammatory arthropathy in 7 patients.

RESULTS

All patients achieved clinical union at 6 weeks and radiological union was confirmed on plain radiographs between 6-16 weeks. One case of hardware removal was reported.

CONCLUSION

The cohort achieved consistently satisfactory results with a reliable and reproducible MTPJ position and a 100% union rate. There was a low rate of hardware removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV evidence. Prospective cohort study.

Immediate Weightbearing After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis With Screw and Locking Plate Fixation: A Short-Term Review

Historically, the postoperative protocol for patients undergoing first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis has included 6 weeks of non-weightbearing, followed by protected weightbearing in a below-the-knee cast boot or postoperative shoe. This prolonged period of non-weightbearing predisposes the patient to disuse atrophy, osteopenia, deep vein thrombosis risk, and, overall, a prolonged time to recovery. The present study reports a retrospective review of a patient cohort that underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion with immediate full weightbearing postoperatively. Thirty consecutive first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodeses were performed during the study period. Five patients were excluded secondary to insufficient postoperative follow-up data or a lack of adequate radiographic evaluation at regular postoperative intervals. Conical reamers were used for joint preparation. Internal fixation, consisting of a single cannulated interfragmentary compression screw and a dorsal locking plate, was used in all patients. The results showed that patients achieved clinical healing at an average of 5.92 weeks and showed radiographic fusion at an average of 6.83 weeks. The patients in the present study had an overall union rate of 96%. Complications included 1 nonunion, 1 superficial wound infection, 1 wound dehiscence, 1 case of symptomatic hardware, and 2 patients with symptomatic hallux interphalangeal joint arthralgia. The mean visual analog pain score preoperatively was 6.64 (range 4 to 8) and postoperatively was 0.6 (range 0 to 4). In conclusion, we found that immediate full weightbearing after first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the context of interfragmentary compression and locked plating techniques is a safe, predictable postoperative protocol that allows for a successful fusion interval and an early return to regular activity.

Long-Term Results of Hemiarthroplasty Compared With Arthrodesis for Osteoarthritis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

If operative treatment is opted for grade 3 and 4 osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, arthrodesis is considered the standard of care. However, if preservation of joint mobility is preferred, implant arthroplasty could be favored. Previous studies have suggested hemiarthroplasty might result in less pain, better function, and greater patient satisfaction compared with arthrodesis. However, these studies only evaluated short-term results (range 2.2 to 6.6 years). The aim of our study was to determine whether patients treated with hemiarthroplasty would show better postoperative outcomes compared with those treated with arthrodesis after ≥5 years after surgery. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hallux metatarsophalangeal interphalangeal (AOFAS-HMI) scale score was used as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes addressed satisfaction rates, patient procedure recommendation, and number of unplanned repeat surgical procedures. We also addressed the influence of the procedures on daily activities (work and sports), the influence of smoking on the postoperative results, and the costs for both procedures. A total of 47 primary arthrodeses and 31 hemiarthroplasties performed between January 2005 and December 2011 were evaluated. After a mean follow-up period of 8.3 (range 5 to 11.8) years, the mean AOFAS-HMI scale score after arthrodesis and hemiarthroplasty was 72.8 ± 14.5 and 89.7 ± 6.6, respectively (p = .001). The patients were significantly more pleased after hemiarthroplasty (p < .001), and this procedure was recommended more often (p < .001). The number of unplanned repeat surgical procedures did not differ between the 2 groups. Patients resumed sports activities significantly sooner after hemiarthroplasty (p = .002). The overall crude costs were similar for both procedures. Our results have shown more favorable postoperative outcomes for hemiarthroplasty compared with arthrodesis as operative treatment of osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint after a mean follow-up period of 8.3 years.

First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Does the Addition of a Lag Screw to a Dorsal Locking Plate Influence Union Rate and/or Final Alignment after Fusion

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP-1) joint fusion is a reliable method for the correction of various deformities, including hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. Ideal constructs provide high rates of fusion in the desired alignment. The present study examined the union rates and the change in dorsiflexion angle during the follow-up period in patients who had undergone MTP-1 fusion with a dorsal locking plate and a lag screw compared with patients who had undergone fusion with a dorsal locking plate alone. We performed a retrospective review of 99 feet undergoing MTP-1 fusion. The joints were fused using either a dorsal locking plate alone or a lag screw plus a dorsal locking plate. Union was determined radiographically during the follow-up period. Suspected nonunions were confirmed by computed tomography. The dorsiflexion angles were radiographically measured at the first postoperative visit and at the final follow-up visit. Of the 99 feet, 36 (36.4%) were in the lag screw plus dorsal plate group and 63 (63.6%) in the dorsal plate group. The mean follow-up period was 12.9 (range 12 to 33.5) months. The dorsal plate plus lag screw group had a significantly lower change in the mean dorsiflexion angle (0.57° ± 5.01°) during the postoperative period compared with the dorsal plate group (6.73° ± 7.07°). The addition of a lag screw to a dorsal locking plate for MTP-1 arthrodesis might offer improved stability of the joint in the sagittal plane over time compared with a dorsal plate alone.

First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

Background:

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis can be fixed using either a dorsal plate or crossed screws. However, there is considerable difference in the cost of these implants, and it is not known if there is sufficient difference in outcome that might justify this cost difference. Our aim was to compare the functional results and patient satisfaction rates after first MTP joint arthrodesis in a group of patients using the same surgical technique except for the fixation devices.

Methods:

A prospective cohort of 27 patients who underwent first MTP joint fusion by the same surgeon using 2 crossed screws or a single screw with a dorsal plate was recruited over a 3-year period. Demographic information, patient satisfaction rates, complications, and union rates were evaluated. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scoring systems were used pre- and postoperatively to compare the functional outcomes. Thirty consecutive procedures (screws, n = 15; plate, n = 15) were performed. Age (55.8 ± 11.1 vs 63.3 ± 12.4 years for screws and plate respectively; P = .091) and female gender percentages (80% and 73%, P = .666) were similar between groups.

Results:

The overall union rate was 93% with no differences between groups. AOFAS and VAS scores improved significantly postoperatively for each technique, and no differences were found between the two in the improvement in AOFAS (42.4 ± 8.0 vs 44.3 ± 8.2, screws and plate respectively; P = .520) and VAS scores (66.0 ± 5.4 vs 69.0 ± 6.9; P = .195). The implant cost for screws was $40 and for dorsal plate, $328.

Conclusions:

First MTP joint fusion using either screws or plate fixation results in an improvement in AOFAS and VAS scores. Functional improvement and patient satisfaction did not differ between the 2 techniques, despite a considerable difference in cost between the two methods of fixation.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, prospective comparative study.

PRINCIPLES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE FIRST METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT

At present, there is no general approach to choosing surgical tactics for hallux rigidus. Many surgical procedures are used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (FMPJ), which are relevant at different stages of the disease. Nevertheless, this fact also suggests that all proposed methods have one or other disadvantages. At the same time, FMPJ arthrodesis that relieves pain and is functionally inferior to joint-sparing surgery remains the gold standard. However, due to the fact that not only persons over the age of 50 years, but also younger patients often suffer from FMPJ OA, the most non-damaging option of joint-sparing surgery is cheilectomy with chondroplasty of the FMPJ, which allows restoration of painless joint motions, thus sparing the anatomy of the foot. Chondroplasty using the authologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) technique for knee, hip, and ankle cartilage defects is described. There are no reports on FMPJ chondroplasty with the AMIC method in either Russian or foreign literature.

Current Concepts Review

Arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, hallux rigid, is a common and disabling source of foot pain in the adult population. Hallux rigidus is characterized by diseased cartilage and large, periarticular osteophytes that result in a stiff, painful joint. Activity modification, sensible shoes, orthotics, anti-inflammatory medications and occasional intra-articular steroid injections can be attempted to alleviate the discomfort associated with hallux rigidus. A number of surgical options exist for the treatment of recalcitrant hallux rigidus. Cheilectomy is a useful treatment for dorsal impingement pain seen in mild hallux rigidus. A new polyvinyl alcohol hemi-arthroplasty implant has shown promising early and midterm results in the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus; however, arthrodesis of the first MTP joint remains the gold standard treatment for advanced hallux rigidus because of unpredictable outcomes after early-generation joint replacement implants.

A locking compression plate versus the gold-standard non-locking plate with lag screw for first metatarsophalangeal fusion: A biomechanical comparison

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of end-stage first metatarso-phalangeal joint (MTP) arthritis has been arthrodesis. A dorsal non-locking plate with a lag screw has been the standard traditional fixation method. This study compares the biomechanical strength of a locking compression plate (LCP) with and without internal compression versus this known gold standard.

METHODS

In group 1, six matched pairs of cadaver great toes were used to compare the standard non-locking dorsal plate and 3.5mm lag screw to an anatomic locking compression plate in which a lag screw was utilized rather than the internal compression features of the plate. In group 2, another six matched pairs of cadaver great toes were used to compare the gold standard to the locking compression plate, utilizing the plate's internal compression feature instead of a lag screw. A material testing system (MTS) machine applied loads to the MTP joints and measured displacement and stiffness of the constructs. The stiffness of the constructs (Young's modulus) was calculated from the force-displacement curves, and the displacement was measured.

RESULTS

The locking compression plate group that used the compression features of the plate, without the lag screw, had less joint displacement and higher stiffness than control (p<0.05). The same plating construct in which a lag screw was used rather than internal compression of the plate was found to be stiffer than the control (p<0.05), but displacement was not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that a locking compression plate alone provides the stiffest construct for a first MTP joint fusion.

Radiographic evaluation of first MTP joint arthrodesis for severe hallux valgus: Does the introduction of a lag screw improve union rates and correction of the intermetatarsal angle?

BACKGROUND

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP-1) joint fusion is a reliable method for the correction of various deformities including hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. Ideal constructs provide high rates of fusion in desired alignment. The present study examines the union rates, as well as the change in dorsiflexion angle during the follow up period in patients who underwent MTP-1 fusion with a dorsal locking plate and a lag screw, versus patients fused with a dorsal locking plate alone.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 99 feet undergoing MTP-1 fusion. Joints were fused using either a dorsal locking plate alone or a lag screw plus a dorsal locking plate. Union was determined radiographically during the follow up period. Suspected nonunions were confirmed with CT. Dorsiflexion angles were radiographically measured at first post-operative visit and at final follow up.

RESULTS

There were 36 patients in the lag screw plus dorsal plate group, and 63 in the dorsal plate group. Mean follow up was 12.9 months (Range: 12-33.5 months). The dorsal plate plus lag screw group had a significantly lower change in mean dorsiflexion angle (0.57°±5.01°) during the post-operative period compared to the dorsal plate group at final follow up versus the dorsal plate group (6.73°±7.07°).

CONCLUSION

The addition of a lag screw to a dorsal locking plate for MTP-1 arthrodesis may offer improved stability of the joint in the sagittal plane over time compared to a dorsal plate alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective level III evidence.

Effect of joint pathology, surface preparation and fixation methods on union frequency after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: A systematic review of the English literature

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review was to perform a qualitative synthesis of the current literature to determine the union frequencies for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis as well as the influence of pathology, joint preparation and fixation methods on union.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant studies reporting on first metatarsophalangeal joint union frequencies.

RESULTS

26 studies with 2059 feet met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 60 years (range 18-84) and the mean follow-up was 32.6 months (range 1.5-156). The union frequency was 93.5% (1923/2059). The union frequencies were significantly higher when low velocity joint preparation methods were used (P<0.0001, Chi Square 22.5) and the pathology was hallux rigidus (P=0.002, Chi square 9.3). There were similarly high union frequencies with crossed screws, locking plate and non-locking plates.

CONCLUSIONS

High union frequency can be expected following first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis, especially when low velocity joint preparation methods are used in patients with hallux rigidus.

Hallux rigidus

An estimated 40% of the US population have foot problems.Of all patients aged over 50 years, 2.5% report degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, termed 'hallux rigidus'. First MTP osteoarthritis is the most common arthritic condition in the foot.Progression of great toe arthritis is associated with pain and loss of motion. Non-surgical intervention begins with shoe modifications and orthotics designed to limit MTP motion.In patients with mild arthritis, operative procedures focus on removing excess osteophytes (cheilectomy) to prevent dorsal impingement with or without a concomitant osteotomy (Moberg) to improve or shift range of motion into a less painful arc.In patients with more advanced arthritis, operative management has centred on arthrodesis of the first MTP joint.A recent Level 1 study shows excellent function and pain relief with a small hydrogel hemi-implant into the metatarsal headMultiple joint-sparing procedures such as joint arthroplasty or resurfacing have been described with inconsistent results. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:13-20. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160031.

Quality of Early Union After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to assess the quality of union and the clinical outcomes in patients who had undergone first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) fusion using a dorsal plate and plantar lag screw. From March 2011 to December 2012, the clinical and radiographic data of 39 patients (41 feet) who had undergone first MTPJ fusion using a compressive locking plate were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had undergone postoperative computed tomography at 6 weeks postoperatively to assess union. The average metatarsophalangeal angles improved from 23° ± 16° preoperatively to 14° ± 5° postoperatively. The dorsiflexion of the hallux at the preoperative assessment averaged 17° ± 11° and 23° ± 5° postoperatively. At 6 weeks postoperatively, the computed tomography scans demonstrated 3 complete fusions (7.3 %) and 38 partial unions (92.7%). Also at 6 weeks, the mean ± standard deviation joint bridging was 54% ± 14.6%. The forefoot American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale score had improved significantly from 50 ± 13 preoperatively to 80 ± 7 at >1 year of follow-up (p = .001). Hardware removal was performed in 8 cases because of pain in 7 and infection in 1. Revision arthrodesis was required in 2 cases because of nonunion. At 6 weeks postoperatively, partial bony joint bridging could be observed in most cases after arthrodesis of the first MTPJ with the dorsal fusion plate.

Long-term outcome of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the treatment of severe hallux rigidus

AIMS

This study was aimed to study the arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using an oblique interfragmentary lag screw and dorsal plate as an effective option for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Few researchers have studied the outcome of this surgical method over a long follow-up period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 60 patients status post arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The mean age was 68.5 years and average follow-up lasted for 47.3 months. Patients' satisfaction and functional outcomes were evaluated with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale, the foot and ankle questionnaire, the Functional Foot Index, and dynamic pedobarography.

RESULTS

Fusion rate of 93.3 % was recorded; 6.7 % of the cases ended up with a painless pseudarthrosis and required no additional surgery. Pedobarographic measurements demonstrated first ray weight bearing function restoration. More physiological foot plantar pressure patterns were observed. Concerning the postoperative outcomes, 71.7 % of the patients were very satisfied and 18.3 % were satisfied. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale increased post-operatively from 40.9 to 79.3.

CONCLUSION

The arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal joint using transarticular screw and dorsal nonlocked plate is an effective method for the treatment of severe hallux rigidus with fair patient satisfaction rate and functional outcome.

Functional Outcomes Following First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis is a common procedure for treatment of arthritis of the first MTP joint. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of a series of patients of multiple surgeons undergoing first MTP joint arthrodesis, emphasizing the functional gains with respect to daily activity that can be expected after this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 53 patients who underwent successful isolated first MTP joint arthrodesis with either a plate and screw or independent screw construct was performed at our institution over a 6-year period. Successful fusion was defined as no lucency at the first MTP joint and bridging of 2 or more cortices on the anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographic views at final follow-up. Demographic information and radiographs were evaluated for all patients. Preoperative and postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form Health Status Survey (SF) 36/12 functional outcome scores, as well as responses from an activity- and footwear-specific questionnaire, were evaluated and compared between the 2 fixation methods. Fifty-three patients (56 feet) had radiographs showing successful fusions after being treated for advanced degenerative arthritis of the first MTP joint with arthrodesis. Average time to union was 5.4 months.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in difficulty in performing daily activities, with all subscales of the FAOS and the SF-12v2 significantly improving postoperatively (P < .05). The majority of patients stated that their foot looked and felt better and were satisfied with the procedure. Five patients experienced painful hardware, which required removal.

CONCLUSION

First MTP joint arthrodesis was successful in improving patient-reported outcomes, particularly the ability to perform daily activities. Most patients had little to no functional limitation and were satisfied with their outcome. The greatest functional improvements were seen in patients' ability to walk distances and perform low-impact sport activity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Immediate Weightbearing of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion Comparing Buried Crossed Kirschner Wires Versus Crossing Screws: Does Incorporating the Sesamoids Into the Fusion Contribute to Higher Incidence of Bony Union?

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis remains a commonly used and reliable procedure for a variety of pathologies of the first MTPJ. Many costly fixation constructions have been described to achieve union with first MTPJ arthrodesis. We hypothesized that the incidence of union would be the same for both buried Kirchner (K)-wire and solid crossed screw fixation with immediate weightbearing. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively reviewed first MTPJ fusions performed by the senior author (C.A.C.) during a 6-year period and compared the incidence of union. Only patients who were immediately weightbearing in a surgical shoe and had undergone first MTPJ arthrodesis using K-wires or crossed screws were included. All patients had undergone incorporation of their sesamoids into the fusion. A total of 97 feet in 89 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the 97 first MTPJ fusions, 48 (49.5%) had buried K-wire fixation and 49 (50.5%) crossed screw fixation. The mean age was 62 (range 41 to 75) years in the K-wire group and 60 (range 22 to 73) years in the crossed screw group. The mean follow-up period was 12.4 months in the K-wire group and 12.9 months in the crossed screw group. The rate of union in the K-wire group was 98% (1 nonunion) and the rate of union in the crossed screw group was 96% (2 nonunions). The 2 groups demonstrated similar high rates of fusion with immediate weightbearing, suggesting that less costly fixation is acceptable and effective for uncomplicated first MTPJ fusion.

Dual plating with bone block arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: A clinical retrospective review

BACKGROUND

First metatarsal phalangeal joint (MTP) arthrodesis is challenging in the setting of bone loss. The purpose of this study was to describe the results of interpositional grafting and arthrodesis of the first MTP joint using two plates in a 90/90 configuration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven patients had an MTP arthrodesis with 90-90 plating with an interpositional allograft. We analyzed the fusion rate, restoration of first ray length, patient satisfaction, and complication rates.

RESULTS

The overall union rate was 90.9%, with an average restoration of 11 ± 4.5mm in length to the first ray. The average time to fusion was 10.7 ± 1 weeks. The mean preoperative AOFAS score improved significantly. The complication rate was 18.2% and included one superficial wound infection and one non-union who underwent a successful fusion after revision.

CONCLUSION

Arthrodesis of the first MTP joint with two 90/90 plates and restoration of length using an interpositional graft has excellent patient satisfaction and functional outcomes.

A Short-Term Retrospective of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Using a Plate With PocketLock Fixation

BACKGROUND

Various techniques have been described for arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the results of fixation for the first MTP arthrodesis of patients treated using dome-shaped reamers to prepare the joint surfaces and a novel MTP Plate with PocketLock fixation.

METHODS

Between July 2012 and November 2013, 16 feet in 16 patients were treated with a first MTP arthrodesis with a MTP Plate with PocketLock fixation. The mean patient age was 58.8 years (range, 46-82 years). Physical and radiographic examinations were performed at follow-up visits. The average follow-up period was 17.3 months. The radiographs were examined for union (3 bridging cortices), time to union, hardware failure, or other radiographic complications. The charts were reviewed to assess AOFAS-MTP-IP (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal) scores and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Fusion was seen in 11 of 16 feet (68.8%) and partial union in 1 patient (6.3%). Five nonunions (31.2%) were noted in the sample group: All were symptomatic and required revision surgery. No malunions were identified in our sample. One hardware failure was documented in a nonunion patient. The mean time to osseous union was 81.7 ± 15.9 days. The preoperative AOFAS MTP-IP score was 55.6 and the postoperative score was 64.7.

CONCLUSION

The high nonunion and revision surgery rates demonstrate that this particular plate should be used with caution for a first MTP joint arthrodesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV: Case series.

1st metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: A comparison of non-union and gender differences between locking and non-locking plating systems

BACKGROUND

Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is a common surgical procedure used to treat a variety of diseases and deformities of the forefoot. Fixation methods vary and typically fusion rates are good.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study are to demonstrate whether there is any advantage to using locking as opposed to non-locking plates for 1st MTPJ fusion. Additionally the study aims to determine whether there is any difference in non-union rates according to gender.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy two consecutive 1st MTPJ fusions were performed for 153 patients. 40 patients (23%) were male and 132 (77%) female. Twenty patients received Hallu-fix™ plates, 76 Charlotte™ plates and 76 Anchorage™ plates. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for non-union. Failure rates were compared using Fisher's exact tests (p=0.05).

RESULTS

Twelve (6.9%) non-unions were identified. The difference in failure rates between all systems was not statistically significant. However, the difference in fusion rates between males (17.5%) and females (3.8%) was significant.

CONCLUSION

This study finds that 1st MTPJ fusion is an effective method to treat diseases of the 1st MTPJ. Locking plates may offer better fusion rates than their non-locking counterparts. This is especially evident in male patients.

First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation

First metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a well established and successful treatment; however there still remains controversy over the best choice of construct. We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing first metatarsalphalangeal fusion over eighteen months (n=52) using either dorsal non-locking plate with additional compression lag screw fixation or dorsal non-locking plate alone. We found when assessing clinical criteria, patients with dorsal non-locking plates and additional compression lag screw fixation had a significantly higher rate of fusion (100% vs 77.8%), significantly higher rate of fusion within the first two months (55.6% vs 83.3%), significantly earlier time to fusion (52.2 days vs 75.6 days), and significantly lower rate of non-union (0% vs 22.2%). When blindly assessing radiographic criteria, the patients treated with the plate and compression screw had a significantly higher rate of fusion and lower rate of non-union (0% vs 33%). There was no statistically significant difference between the frequencies of complications in the groups. We believe that the interfragmentary compression is a crucial factor in achieving good union rates and recommend the use of non-locking pre-contoured plating with additional interfragmentary compression screw as the fixation method of choice for these procedures.

Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion: Why and How?

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint fusion aims at elimination of pain resulting from end-stage arthritis and obtaining a stable, plantigrade first toe. Associated deformities are corrected and greater defects are filled with interposition autograft or allograft. Fusion is generally obtained with screws, staples, and/or low-profile plates. Complications include infection, osteonecrosis, implant protrusion or failure, nonunion, and malunion, the latter 2 each occurring in approximately 6% of cases. The medium-term results of first MTP joint fusion indicate mostly good functional results with success rates of approximately 90%.

Interposition bone block arthrodesis for revision hallux metatarsophalangeal joint surgery: a case series

BACKGROUND

The operative management of failed hallux metatarsophalangeal joint surgery can be difficult. There is often substantial shortening of the first ray. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is one treatment option, but results in further shortening of the first ray.

METHODS

We present a large retrospective series of patients who had an interposition bone block arthrodesis procedure performed using a nonvascularized tricortical autologous iliac crest bone graft in an attempt to maintain first ray length. Twenty-four patients (25 feet) underwent this salvage procedure over a 10-year period. The mean follow-up period was 62 (range, 11-117) months.

RESULTS

Indications included failed hallux valgus surgery, Keller's procedures, various other first metatarsal osteotomies, and failed arthrodesis procedures with shortening of the first ray. All patients had tricortical iliac crest grafts inserted into bony defects of mean length 10.7 (range, 8-15) mm. Fixation was achieved using either multiple wires or a low-profile plate. Mean lengthening was 4.4 (range, 0-8) mm. Three feet went on to nonunion requiring further revision surgery and at latest follow-up 2 had united. All patients underwent removal of a stabilizing Kirschner wire. Median patient-reported outcome score using the Foot and Ankle Disability Index was 84.6 (range, 37.5-97.1).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest this procedure was successful in salvaging failed first ray surgery and prevented further shortening. We believe good results can be achieved, but care must be taken to ensure wound closure without excessive tension to permit wound healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Simultaneous first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis and sesamoidectomy with a single dorsomedial incision

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus. Despite the excellent and predictable clinical results, the procedure does not address the metatarso-sesamoid joint complex. There has been one case report of arthritis of the metatarsal sesamoid joint as uncommon cause of post-arthrodesis hallux pain. Additionally, we have noted this complication in our practice as well despite the paucity of reported cases in the published literature. Resection of either the tibial or fibular sesamoid is an acceptable treatment for recalcitrant sesamoid pain; however, resection of both the tibial and fibular sesamoids as would be required for arthritic changes is not encouraged to prevent the risk of a cock-up toe deformity. Arthrodesis of the first MTP joint eliminates the possibility of this complication. Resection of the sesamoids following a first MTP fusion requires a separate incision with additional morbidity and risk to the medial plantar digital nerve. This second surgical intervention is not without morbidity and carries additional cast to the patient, which can be avoided if the pathology is appropriately identified preoperatively. We describe the surgical indications and novel technique for a first MTP arthrodesis and total sesamoid resection through a standard dorsomedial incision. The approach adds minimal surgical time and morbidity and eliminates the source of plantar first MTP pain that is present in a cohort of patients with hallux rigidus.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case Series.

Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for hallux rigidus

BACKGROUND

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis plays a significant role in the management of symptomatic hallux rigidus. Several open and one percutaneous technique have been described in the literature. The authors present a minimally invasive technique, not previously published in the UK with patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 26 cases of are presented in this prospective, continuous series. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction were assessed by the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) preoperatively and at most recent follow up (maximum 20 months). Radiographic and clinical evaluation of fusion was also assessed with a fusion rate of 93%.

RESULTS

The MOXFQ score for cases where fusion was achieved improved from a mean of 42 points to 18 points at last follow up (p<0.05). Patient satisfaction was overall very good.

CONCLUSIONS

This minimally invasive technique is simple and can achieve results similar or better than open techniques in experienced hands. Postoperative care requirements are minimal and both clinical and patient-reported outcome show significant improvement in this series.

Complication rates in diabetics with first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis has been an effective surgical entity when indicated, but a range of severe to mild complications can occur from this procedure. Patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk in surgical complications, most commonly associated with soft tissue and bone healing, when compared to non-diabetic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complication rates of first MTPJ arthrodesis in diabetic patients and compare them to the existing complication rates for the procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was done on 76 diabetic patients, from June 2002 to August 2012. Thirty-two males and 44 females were included in the study. The authors evaluated many variables that could impact postoperative complications, including age, gender, bone graft incorporation, hemoglobin A1c, tobacco use, body mass index, peripheral neuropathy, hallux extensus, hallux interphalangeal arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, and compared them with the complication findings. Patient follow-up was no less than 24 months.

RESULTS

Overall, approximately two-thirds of the patients had no complications and 35.5% of patients had at least one mild or moderate complication. Of the non-union and mal-union complications, 80 and 70% had peripheral neuropathy, respectively. One hundred percent of the patients that had mal-positions or hardware failure also had peripheral neuropathy. No severe complications were seen during follow-up. Only two of the moderate complications needed revisions, and the rest of those with moderate complications were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, first MTPJ arthrodesis is overall an effective and beneficial procedure in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy have an increased risk for mild and moderate complications.