NSABP breast cancer clinical trials: recent results and future directions

Age-stratified analysis of health-related quality of life in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation therapy and endocrine therapy

INTRODUCTION

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older patients with breast cancer (BC) (≥70 years) is not well studied. This study assesses aging-related differences in patient-reported outcomes among estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) patients with BC treated with breast conservation surgery (BCS), radiation therapy (RT), and endocrine therapy (ET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 2,057 patients with ER+ early-stage BC enrolled in the prospective multicenter REQUITE study, 1,003 patients receiving adjuvant RT + ET as the only systemic therapy constitute our study population. Patients were stratified by age into younger (<70 years, n = 810 patients) and older (≥70 years, n = 193 patients) groups. Prospectively collected HRQoL was measured using the validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life of cancer patients (QLQ-30) and breast cancer-specific quality of life (QLQ-BR23), and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) measures at baseline following BCS and pre-adjuvant treatment, post-RT, and at one-year, two-year, and three-year intervals. Statistical analysis involved a mixed model analysis of variance, weighted by propensity scoring.

RESULTS

Older patients had a higher burden of comorbidities, larger tumor size, and higher rates of N1 disease compared to the younger group. RT boost to the lumpectomy site was more often delivered in younger participants (72 %) compared to older (50 %). Younger patients predominately received tamoxifen (63.5 %), while older patients more commonly received aromatase inhibitors (67.4 %). Throughout the follow-up, we observed that the younger patients showed greater recovery in QoL domains including sexual enjoyment, systemic side effects, breast symptoms, global health status, and emotional, physical, and social functioning compared to the older group. Cognitive function, which declined from baseline in both groups, improved over time in younger participants but persisted at lower levels in older patients at the three-year follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

Adjuvant treatments differentially impacted HRQoL, with older patients experiencing greater and more persistent adverse effects compared to younger counterparts. These findings underscore the need for tailored interventions that address the unique challenges in HRQoL recovery among older BC survivors.

An observational study comparing the dosimetry and clinical effects of conventional versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients of early breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Hypofractionated radiation therapy after Breast Conserving Surgery in patients of early breast carcinoma results in equivalent clinical outcome but better cosmesis as compared to conventional therapy. In this study we have compared the dosimetry and clinical outcome between Hypofractionated and Conventional whole breast radiation followed by boost therapy after patients had undergone breast conserving surgery for early breast cancer.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

1. Dosimetric analysis and toxicity assessment between conventional and Hypofractionated radiation therapy.2. Comparative analysis of late toxicity between two groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the department of Radiation Oncology in a Tertiary Care Hospital, 100 patients between the age group 65-75 years were selected as per inclusion criteria of the study and there were 60 patients in the conventional group and 40 in the hypofractionated group respectively. All the patients underwent treatment in Varian Truebeam Linear accelerator with appropriate radiation planning after undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery along with adjuvant chemotherapy when indicated.The conventional group received a dose of 50 Gy in 25# followed by boost of 10 Gy in 5 # and the hypofractionated arm received a dose of 42.5Gy in 16# followed by a boost of 12.5Gy in 5 # . The post-operative tumour cavity was irradiated along with axillary lymph nodes when indicated. All the patients in both arms were assessed for toxicity related to therapy and quality of life as per EORTC Q45 in 2 years following treatment completion. All statistical tests were done by SPSS version 23. Unpaired t-test was used for dosimetric comparison. Comparison of QOL and toxicity was done by Chi-square test respectively between two groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was taken to be significant.

RESULTS

At the end of 2 years, 54 patients in conventional group and 38 patients in hypofractionated group could be assessed respectively and rest in both groups had lost to follow-up due to logistical reasons. There was no significant difference in dosimetry between the two groups as per unpaired t-test (P value >0.05). In terms of Quality of Life assessment in two years following the completion of therapy the conventional arm had more toxicity than hypofractionated arm as per Chi-square test (P value <0.05). Chi-square test revealed patients who had conventional therapy had worse cosmetic outcome and increased incidence of myelotoxicity than in those who received hypofractionated therapy, both statistically significant (P value < 0.05). There was no incidence of locoregional relapse in either groups.

CONCLUSION

Hypofractionated whole breast Radiation therapy followed by boost therapy with can result in less toxicity and thus better cosmetic outcome and almost equal dosimetric results compared to Conventional Radiotherapy in patients after breast conserving surgery, thus comparatively increasing their quality of life.

Long-term outcomes by lobular vs ductal histology in 4 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant breast cancer trials

We evaluated differences in long-term outcomes of invasive lobular carcinoma vs breast cancers of no special type treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy using 4 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized phase III trials (B-22, B-25, B-28, and B-30). Our cohort included 11 251 patients with no special type and 1231 with invasive lobular carcinoma. Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma were older, had larger and more frequently estrogen receptor-positive tumors, and more positive lymph nodes. During early follow-up (0-5 years), patients with invasive lobular carcinoma had fewer recurrences (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.797, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.685 to 0.929) and deaths (HR = 0.756, 95% CI = 0.623 to 0.917). After 5 years, patients with invasive lobular carcinoma had more recurrences (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.085 to 1.558) and deaths (HR = 1.044, 95% CI = 0.898 to 1.214). Conditional probability analysis showed statistically significant interactions between time-period and histologic type for recurrences (P < .001) and deaths (P < .001). Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma have elevated risk of late recurrence and death compared with patients with no special type cancers.

Postoperative radiotherapy in women with early operable breast cancer (Scottish Breast Conservation Trial): 30-year update of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving surgery, adjuvant systemic therapy, and radiotherapy are the standard of care for most women with early breast cancer. There are few reports of clinical outcomes beyond the first decade of follow-up of randomised trials comparing breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy. We present a 30-year update of the Scottish Breast Conservation Trial.

METHODS

In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial across 14 hospitals in Scotland, women aged younger than 70 years with early breast cancer (tumours ≤4 cm [T1 or T2 and N0 or N1]) were included. They underwent breast-conserving surgery (1 cm margin) with axillary node sampling or clearance. Oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich patients (≥20 fmol/mg protein) received 20 mg oral tamoxifen daily for 5 years. ER-poor patients (<20 fmol/mg protein) received chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 50 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 every 21 days intravenously in eight courses). Stratification was by menstrual status (within or more than 12 months from last menstrual period) and ER status (oestrogen concentration ≥20 fmol/mg protein, <20 fmol/mg protein, or unknown) and patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to high-dose (50 Gy in 20-25 fractions) local or locoregional radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy. No blinding was possible due to the nature of the treatment. We report the primary endpoint of the original trial, ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence, and the co-primary endpoint, overall survival. Clinical outcomes were compared by the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) are reported, with no radiotherapy as the reference group. Failures of the proportional hazards assumption are reported if significant. All analyses are by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 1985, and Oct 2, 1991, 589 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (293 to radiotherapy and 296 to no radiotherapy). After exclusion of four ineligible patients (two in each group), there were 291 patients in the radiotherapy group and 294 patients in the no radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 17·5 years (IQR 8·4-27·9). Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence was significantly lower in the radiotherapy group than in the no radiotherapy group (46 [16%] of 291 vs 107 [36%] of 294; HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·28-0·55], p<0·0001). Although there were differences in the hazard rate for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence in the first decade after treatment (HR 0·24 [95% CI 0·15-0·38], p<0·0001), subsequent risks of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence were similar in both groups (0·98 [0·54-1·79], p=0·95). There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups (median 18·7 years [95% CI 16·5-21·5] in the no radiotherapy group vs 19·2 years [16·9-21·3] in the radiotherapy group; HR 1·08 [95% CI 0·89-1 ·30], log-rank p=0·43).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that patients whose biology predicts a late relapse a decade or more after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer might gain little from adjuvant radiotherapy.

FUNDING

Breast Cancer Institute (part of Edinburgh and Lothian Health Foundation) and PFS Genomics (now part of Exact Sciences).

Allostatic load as a predictor of postoperative complications in patients with breast cancer

Allostatic load (AL) is a biological measure of cumulative exposure to socioenvironmental stressors (e.g., poverty). This study aims to examine the association between allostatic load (AL) and postoperative complications (POC) among patients with breast cancer. Females ages 18+ with stage I-III breast cancer who received surgical management between 01/01/2012-12/31/2020 were identified in the Ohio State Cancer registry. The composite AL measure included biomarkers from the cardiovascular, metabolic, immune, and renal systems. High AL was defined as composite scores greater than the cohort's median (2.0). POC within 30 days of surgery were examined. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis examined the association between AL and POC. Among 4459 patients, 8.2% had POC. A higher percentage of patients with POC were unpartnered (POC 44.7% vs no POC 35.5%), government-insured (POC 48.2% vs no POC 38.3%) and had multiple comorbidities (POC 32% vs no POC 20%). Patients who developed POC were more likely to have undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by axillary lymph node dissection (POC 51.2% vs no POC 44.6%). High AL was associated with 29% higher odds of POC (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.01-1.63). A one-point increase in AL was associated with 8% higher odds of POC (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.16) and a quartile increase in AL was associated with 13% increased odds of POC (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26). Among patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, increased exposure to adverse socioenvironmental stressors, operationalized as AL, was associated with higher odds of postoperative complications.

Local Flaps in Breast-Conserving Surgery in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Armamentarium for Breast Surgeon

To describe the technique and outcome of local perforator arteries advancement flap in breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) in patient of early breast cancer as our initial experience and review of literature on it. Patients who underwent (BCS) with local perforator artery flap reconstruction were reviewed in terms of their clinical, surgical, and post-operative follow-up details after taking written and informed consent. We have described 4 patients of early breast cancer out of which one patient was post-NACT while 3 were for upfront BCS. We have performed LICAP in 2 patients, AICAP in 1 patient, and IMAP in one patient, depending on the location of primary tumors. None of the patients had any major or minor surgical complications in the post-operative period and drains were removed on post-operative day 2. All patients received post-operative radiotherapy and tolerated well without any loco-regional complications. Patients are in routine follow-up with cosmetic satisfaction without any local recurrence over 1 year. The main advantages of pedicled perforator flaps are well-vascularized tissue, spares underlying muscle leading to lesser donor site morbidity like muscle function and seroma formation, easily reach the breast area with good match in terms of skin and subcutaneous tissue, faster recovery, and shorter learning curve in comparison to free flaps. Knowledge and skill about these flaps will help surgeon to give better surgical outcomes and satisfaction to patients.

Allostatic Load as a Predictor of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Allostatic load (AL) is a biological measure of cumulative exposure to socioenvironmental stressors (e.g., poverty). This study aims to examine the association between allostatic load (AL) and postoperative complications (POC) among patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Assigned females at birth ages 18 + with stage I-III breast cancer who received surgical management between 01/01/2012-12/31/2020 were identified in the Ohio State Cancer registry. The composite AL measure included biomarkers from the cardiovascular, metabolic, immune, and renal systems. High AL was defined as composite scores greater than the cohort's median (2.0). POC within 30 days of surgery were examined. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis examined the association between AL and POC.

RESULTS

Among 4,459 patients, 8.2% had POC. A higher percentage of patients with POC were unpartnered (POC 44.7% vs no POC 35.5%), government-insured (POC 48.2% vs no POC 38.3%) and had multiple comorbidities (POC 32% vs no POC 20%). Patients who developed POC were more likely to have undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by axillary lymph node dissection (POC 51.2% vs no POC 44.6%). High AL was associated with 29% higher odds of POC (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.01-1.63). A one-point increase in AL was associated with 8% higher odds of POC (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.16) and a quartile increase in AL was associated with 13% increased odds of POC (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, increased exposure to adverse socioenvironmental stressors, operationalized as AL, was associated with higher odds of postoperative complications.

Hormone, Targeted, and Combinational Therapies for Breast Cancers: From Humans to Dogs

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer in women. In female dogs, canine mammary gland tumor (CMT) is also the leading neoplasm. Comparative oncology indicates similar tumor behaviors between human BCs (HBCs) and CMTs. Therefore, this review summarizes the current research in hormone and targeted therapies and describes the future prospects for HBCs and CMTs. For hormone receptor-expressing BCs, the first medical intervention is hormone therapy. Monoclonal antibodies against Her2 are proposed for the treatment of Her2+ BCs. However, the major obstacle in hormone therapy or monoclonal antibodies is drug resistance. Therefore, increasing alternatives have been developed to overcome these difficulties. We systemically reviewed publications that reported inhibitors targeting certain molecules in BC cells. The various treatment choices for humans decrease mortality in females with BC. However, the development of hormone or targeted therapies in veterinary medicine is still limited. Even though some clinical trials have been proposed, severe side effects and insufficient case numbers might restrict further explorations. This difficulty highlights the urgent need to develop updated hormone/targeted therapy or novel immunotherapies. Therefore, exploring new therapies to provide more precise use in dogs with CMTs will be the focus of future research. Furthermore, due to the similarities shared by humans and dogs, well-planned prospective clinical trials on the use of combinational or novel immunotherapies in dogs with CMTs to obtain solid results for both humans and dogs can be reasonably anticipated in the future.

FAIR Health Informatics: A Health Informatics Framework for Verifiable and Explainable Data Analysis

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has hit humanity very hard in ways rarely observed before. In this digitally connected world, the health informatics and investigation domains (both public and private) lack a robust framework to enable rapid investigation and cures. Since the data in the healthcare domain are highly confidential, any framework in the healthcare domain must work on real data, be verifiable, and support reproducibility for evidence purposes. In this paper, we propose a health informatics framework that supports data acquisition from various sources in real-time, correlates these data from various sources among each other and to the domain-specific terminologies, and supports querying and analyses. Various sources include sensory data from wearable sensors, clinical investigation (for trials and devices) data from private/public agencies, personnel health records, academic publications in the healthcare domain, and semantic information such as clinical ontologies and the Medical Subject Heading ontology. The linking and correlation of various sources include mapping personnel wearable data to health records, clinical oncology terms to clinical trials, and so on. The framework is designed such that the data are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable with proper Identity and Access Mechanisms. This practically means to tracing and linking each step in the data management lifecycle through discovery, ease of access and exchange, and data reuse. We present a practical use case to correlate a variety of aspects of data relating to a certain medical subject heading from the Medical Subject Headings ontology and academic publications with clinical investigation data. The proposed architecture supports streaming data acquisition and servicing and processing changes throughout the lifecycle of the data management. This is necessary in certain events, such as when the status of a certain clinical or other health-related investigation needs to be updated. In such cases, it is required to track and view the outline of those events for the analysis and traceability of the clinical investigation and to define interventions if necessary.

The molecular heterogeneity of the precancerous breast affects drug efficacy

In the therapeutic domain, targeted therapies have been shown to be generally more effective when given to patients with tumors that harbor the targeted aberration. This principle has not been tested in cancer prevention despite evidence that molecular heterogeneity accompanies the multi-step progression to invasive disease. We hypothesized that efficacy of agents targeting the precancerous state varies based on timing of the treatment relative to the underlying molecular changes. MCF10A cell line-based model of the multi-step progression to TNBC was used. Global proteomic patterns were obtained and growth-inhibitory effects of selected agents were correlated with the underlying molecular stage of progression. These analyses revealed that most protein alterations were acquired in the normal-to-atypia (preneoplasia) transition, with only handful aberrations acquired hereafter. The efficacy of small molecule inhibitors of the AKT/MEK pathway was associated with the underlying pathway levels. Similarly, fluvastatin was more effective in inhibiting cell proliferation earlier in the progression model. However, the nonspecific inhibitors, aspirin and metformin, were equally ineffective in inhibiting proliferation across the progression model. Our data provides proof-of-principle that in the prevention domain, treatment with agents developed to target specific pathways, will need to consider the molecular heterogeneity of the precancerous breast in order to achieve maximum efficacy.

Hispanic Ethnicity and Breast Cancer: Disaggregating Surgical Management and Mortality by Race

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic women. Unfortunately, few studies disaggregate Hispanic patients by race to understand its implications on treatment and clinical outcomes such as mortality. The aim of this study is to examine surgical management and overall mortality among different subgroups of women who self-identify as Hispanic.

METHODS

Hispanic female patients, ages 18-90, stages I-III, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2015 from the National Cancer Data Base were identified. The study cohort was divided into three ethnoracial categories: (1) Hispanic White (HW), 2) Hispanic Black (HB), and 3) Hispanic Other (HO). Descriptive statistics and multivariate models were constructed to determine the relationship between sociodemographic factors, clinical variables, surgical management, and mortality when disaggregated by race.

RESULTS

There were 56,675 Hispanic women who met the study criteria. Most where HW (n=50,599, 89.3%) and the rest were HB (n=1,334, 2.4%) and HO (n=4,742, 8.3%). There was no difference between the three groups on receipt of breast conservation therapy (P=0.12). HB (48.5%) and HO (46.6%) women were more likely to undergo reconstruction than those who identified as HW (38.7%) (P<0.001). Additionally, HB (38.3%) women were more likely to undergo tissue-based reconstruction than HW (29.0%) and HO women (30%) (P=0.0008). There was no difference between the groups in the utilization of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) (P=0.078). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in mortality between HB and HW patients (HR 1.18, 95%CI 0.92-1.51; Ref HW). However, HO women had a 24% relative risk reduction in mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.92; HW ref).

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study suggest there are ethnoracial disparities in reconstruction utilization and mortality among Hispanic women. Future studies should examine how culture, language, healthcare access, and patient preferences contribute to these disparities.

A Short History of Bernard Fisher's Contributions to Randomized Clinical Trials

Dr. Bernard Fisher (1918-2019) was an early proponent of evidence-based medicine using the mechanism of prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trials to test biological and clinical hypotheses. In this article, I trace how his early scientific work in striving to understand the nature of cancer metastasis through animal experiments led to a new, testable, clinical hypothesis: that surgery to remove only the tumor and a small amount of tissue around it was as effective as the more disfiguring operations that were then the standard treatment. Fisher's work with the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) using large, randomized clinical trials to demonstrate the veracity of this hypothesis led to a new paradigm in which the emphasis was placed on how systemic therapies used at an early stage of disease could effectively eradicate breast cancer for many patients. This new therapeutic approach led to the successful development of new treatments, many of which are widely used today. Ultimately, the new paradigm led to successfully preventing breast cancer in women who were at high risk for the disease but who had not yet been diagnosed with the disease. Throughout his entire career, Fisher championed the use of large prospective, randomized clinical trials despite criticism from many in the medical community who strongly criticized his use of randomization as a mechanism for testing clinical hypotheses. The approach he and the NSABP employed is still considered to be the highest standard of evidence in conducting clinical studies.

Breast Cancer Disparities and the Impact of Geography

Neighborhood has significant implications for breast cancer screening, stage, treatment, and mortality. Patients residing in neighborhoods with high deprivation or rurality face barriers and challenges to accessing and receiving care. Consequently, they experience higher mortality rates than their financially affluent or urban counterparts. There are multiple gaps in the literature on the relationship between place of residence and the use of systemic therapies or emerging surgical strategies for disease management. As the management of breast cancer continues to evolve, additional studies are needed to understand the implications of place on the implementation and dissemination of new and emerging treatment modalities.

Choosing Mastectomy vs. Lumpectomy-With-Radiation: Experiences of Breast Cancer Survivors

Background

Annually about 280,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer. Treatment options depend on age, comorbidities, tumor stage, grade, size, and other factors. Often, patients must decide between two surgical treatment options: mastectomy or lumpectomy-with-radiation herein simply called a lumpectomy. Since both offer similar survival outcomes, the choice ultimately is the patient’s. However, most rely on inputs from doctors, family, friends, personal research, and other actions. We believe decision-making processes for future patients will be aided if experiences of prior breast cancer survivors are known. This study’s aim is to provide such information.

Methods

Feedback from prior breast cancer survivors was obtained using a 19-question survey distributed online to multiple breast cancer support groups. It focused on issues relevant to choosing between the two surgical options including, post-surgical complications, breast reconstruction, chronic pain, cosmetics, and surgery-choice satisfaction.

Results

Respondents (N=1606) had a median age of 49 years (range 26 to 88 years) and had a median body mass index (BMI) of 26.6 Kg/m². There were 978 mastectomy patients (60.9%) and 628 lumpectomy patients (39.1%). With regard to post-surgical reconstruction, 64.2% of mastectomy respondents and 13.5% of lumpectomy respondents decided to undergo breast cancer reconstruction following breast cancer surgery. Almost all (99.8%) of lumpectomy respondents had radiation side-effects; with skin irritation and thickening and chest wall tenderness being the most common. Among mastectomy patients, 94.3% had one or more complications; loss-or-changes in nipple or breast sensation, uneven breasts, chest wall tenderness, and breast swelling were the most common complications. Post-surgical pain lasting six months or more was experienced by a smaller percentage of mastectomy vs. lumpectomy patients (64.1% vs. 78%, p <0.00001). Mastectomy patients were also less likely to have pain that was persistent and present up to the time of the survey (35.4% vs. 46.0%, p=0.0002). With respect to cosmetic outcomes, mastectomy patients vs. lumpectomy patients were less likely to be either satisfied or very satisfied (52.2% vs. 62.7%, p=0.00004). Overall satisfaction of surgical treatment was 70.9% for mastectomy patients and 68.6% for lumpectomy patients.

Conclusion

Based on the experiences of these breast cancer survivors, mastectomy is associated with less chronic pain frequency and lower incidence of post-surgical side effects compared to lumpectomy. However, mastectomy is associated with lower cosmetic satisfaction. Breast cancer survivors that underwent a lumpectomy, reported being more satisfied with cosmetic outcomes but almost all reported radiation side-effects with skin thickening listed as the most common. Lumpectomy was also associated with higher chronic pain frequency compared to mastectomy.

The overall surgical treatment satisfaction reported by mastectomy and lumpectomy respondents was similar. The composite findings will provide information that will aid future breast cancer patients in making a decision between having a mastectomy or a lumpectomy.

When the World Throws You a Curve Ball: Lessons Learned in Breast Cancer Management

In the care of patients with operable breast cancer, there has been a shift toward increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy. There are benefits to neoadjuvant therapy, such as monitoring for response, as well as an increased rate of breast conservation and reduction of potential morbidity associated with breast surgery, including axillary management. Among patients with highly proliferative tumors, such as HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer, those with residual disease are at higher risk of recurrence, which informs the recommended systemic therapy in the adjuvant setting. For instance, in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, there is a role for adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine for those with residual disease at the time of surgery. The same holds true regarding the role of adjuvant capecitabine in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With the added complexities of treating patients in the era of the COVID-19 outbreak, additional considerations are critical, including initiation of surgery within an appropriate time from completion of neoadjuvant therapy. National consensus guidelines on time to surgery must be developed to improve measurement and comparison across systems. In addition, there is emerging radiation treatment management research addressing a number of factors, including hypofractionation, role of proton beam therapy, safe omission of radiotherapy, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without drug combination. In this article, the multidisciplinary approach of treating patients with operable breast cancer is highlighted, with updates and future considerations described.

The Potential Use of Tumour-Based Prognostic and Predictive Tools in Older Women with Primary Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review

A move is under way towards personalised cancer treatment, where tumour biology of an individual patient is examined to give unique predictive and prognostic information. This is extremely important in the setting of older women, who have treatment-specific goals which may differ from their younger counterparts, and may include conservation of quality of life rather than curative intent of treatment. One method employed to assist with this is the use of tumour-based prognostic and predictive tools. This article explores six of the most common tumour-based tools currently available on the market: MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, Mammostrat, Prosigna, EndoPredict, IHC4. The article discusses the creation and validation of these tools, their use and validation in older women, and future directions in the field. With the exception of Oncotype Dx, which has also been licensed for prediction of response from adjuvant chemotherapy, these tools have been licensed for use as prognostic tools only, mainly in the setting of adjuvant therapy following surgery. The evidence base for use in older women is strongest for Mammostrat and PAM50, although overall the evidence is much weaker than that in younger women. Where older women have been included in validation studies, this is often in small numbers, or the exact proportion of older women is unknown. In practice, all six of the tools are recommended to be utilised on surgical excision specimens, as well as in core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens in all of the tools except Mammostrat. This is extremely important in the setting of older women, of whom a large proportion do not undergo surgery. The suggested nature of the sample is formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded in all the tools except MammaPrint, which can also be performed on fresh-frozen samples. Future development of prognostic tools in older women with breast cancer should focus on treatment dilemmas specific to this population. This includes the decision of primary treatment between surgery or endocrine therapy and decisions regarding adjuvant therapy, in particular, chemotherapy.

Defining the Need for Imaging and Biopsy After Mastectomy

BACKGROUND

The proportion of patients eligible for breast-conservation therapy (BCT) yet opting for mastectomy is increasing. This decision is often driven by the desire to eliminate future screening and/or biopsy of the remaining breast or breasts. This study investigated the incidence of post-mastectomy imaging and biopsy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all unilateral mastectomy (UM) and bilateral mastectomy (BM) cases managed at a single institution was undertaken. Post-mastectomy imaging and biopsy rates were determined.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2015, 185 UM and 200 BM cases managed for breast cancer were identified. The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range 3-75 months). For the patients with UM, imaging studies and biopsies done on the contralateral side were excluded given the standard of care for continued surveillance of the contralateral breast. Of the 185 UM patients, 19 (10%) underwent ipsilateral imaging (all ultrasounds) for physical examination findings, 11 (6%) underwent biopsy, and 2 (1%) had malignant findings. Of the 200 BM patients, 31 (15.5%) required imaging (29 ultrasounds and 2 MRIs), with 76% of the ultrasounds performed on the side with previous cancer. Subsequently, 16 (8%) of the BM patients had biopsy, with 11 (69%) of the 16 biopsies performed on the ipsilateral side. Three (1.5%) of the biopsies done on ipsilateral side demonstrated malignancy, whereas all the contralateral biopsies were benign.

CONCLUSIONS

For 10-15.5% of patients who undergo mastectomy, either UM or BM, subsequent imaging is required, whereas 6-8% undergo biopsy. The yield of malignancy is low, approximately 1%. Thus, after mastectomy, the need for imaging and biopsy is not eliminated. This information is critical for patient understanding and expectation related to surgical decision making.

Disparities in Breast Cancer: Private Patients Have Better Outcomes Than Public Patients

INTRODUCTION

Different outcomes in breast cancer have been reported for low and high socio-economic groups. We present data quantifying disparities between South African public and private patients.

METHODS

Records of 240 consecutive patients treated in 2008 in a public versus 97 patients in a private health facility were reviewed for demographic and oncologic data.

RESULTS

The average of patients was 56.2 versus 51.9 years (p = 0.032). Stage at presentation was 0 in 0.83 versus 25.8%, I in 4.5 versus 15.5%, II in 41.3 versus 37.1%, III in 37.1 versus 18.6% and IV in 16.3 versus 3.1% public versus private patients. Seventy-three percent of patients were symptomatic versus 57.7%. Of patients with stage 0-III disease, 17.9 versus 20% had simple tumour excision and 7.5 versus 14%, oncoplastic tumour excision. The mastectomy rate was similar (52 vs. 60%), but immediate reconstruction was performed in 10 versus 63%. Public patients were less likely to have radiotherapy. The pathology was similar, 27.2 versus 20, 54 versus 52, 87 versus 61% of patients with stage I, II and III disease, respectively, had chemotherapy. Hormonal therapy for premenopausal patients in private was a LHRH agonist in 9.3%, ovarian ablation/BSO in 11.7% of public patients; biologicals were given in 7.2 versus 0% of patients. Overall survival for public versus private was 66 versus 80% (p < 0.001) months. Better per stage survival of private patients 100 versus 100, 72.7 versus 93.3, 84.8 versus 88.9, 57.3 versus 77.8 and 33 versus 33% for stages 0, I, II, III and IV, did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The greatest impact on outcome was stage at presentation, but more aggressive therapy for each stage resulted in a trend to better outcome for private patients.

Critical review of axillary recurrence in early breast cancer

Around 2% of early breast cancer cases treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) underwent axillary recurrence (AR) and it has a deleterious effect in prognosis. Different scenarios have incorporated Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Biopsy (SLNB) instead of ALND as part of the standard treatment and more effective systemic treatment has also been incorporated in routine management after first curative surgery and after regional recurrence. However, there is concern about the effect of SLNB alone over AR risk and how to predict and treat AR. SLN biopsy (SLNB) has been largely accepted as a valid option for SLN-negative cases, and recent prospective studies have demonstrated that it is also safe for some SLN-positive cases and both scenarios carry low AR rates. Different studies have identified clinicopathological factors related to aggressiveness as well as high-risk molecular signatures can predict the development of locoregional recurrence. Other publications have evaluated factors affecting prognosis after AR and find that time between initial treatment and AR as well as tumor aggressive behavior influence patient survival. Retrospective and prospective studies indicate that treatment of AR should include local and systemic treatment for a limited time.

Rationale for Mastectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) reduces tumor size, facilitating the use of breast conservation surgery (BCS). However, mastectomy remains the surgical outcome for certain women. The goal of this study was to determine the rationale for mastectomy after NAC, particularly in women eligible for BCS. Retrospective data were reviewed on patients who received NAC between February 2006 and August 2010 at our institution. Demographics and tumor characteristics were compared between patients who received BCS and mastectomy after NAC. Of 149 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 102 (68%) underwent BCS and 47 (32%) underwent mastectomy. Patient preference was the most common rationale for mastectomy ( n = 19; 40%), followed by extent of disease ( n = 13; 28%), presence of a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation ( n = 9; 19%), persistent positive margins ( n = 5; 11%), and wound complications ( n = 1; 2%). Of the 47 patients who underwent mastectomy, 37 (79%) were eligible for BCS after NAC. Larger pathologic tumor size (2.05 vs 1.25 cm, P = 0.04) and lobular histology [invasive lobular carcinomas, n = 12/17 (70%) vs invasive ductal carcinomas, n = 36/133 (27%); P < 0.01] were associated with increased rate of mastectomy. After NAC, patient preference, extent of disease, and the presence of a BRCA mutation account for the vast majority of mastectomies. Interestingly, most of these patients were shown to be candidates for breast conservation. This highlights the importance of educating patients about their surgical choice and the lack of evidence, showing a benefit to more extensive surgery.

Endocrine Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: Updated Review

BACKGROUND

Although breast cancer is still the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths, breast cancer mortality has been declining because of advances in the use of adjuvant therapies.

METHODS

We summarize clinical trials involving endocrine therapies used to treat early breast cancer and discuss their inception and recent advances.

RESULTS

Endocrine therapies such as tamoxifen have revolutionized the treatment of breast cancer, resulting in significant decreases in cancer-related mortality. Aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole and letrozole have further improved breast cancer survival.

CONCLUSION

With the implementation of such therapies resulting in decreased mortality, patients with breast cancer are living longer than ever before. The focus of research is now directed toward the length of treatment and prediction models for recurrence.

Local recurrence rates are low in high-risk neoadjuvant breast cancer in the I-SPY 1 Trial (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657)

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, women with stage 2 and 3 breast cancers receive neoadjuvant therapy, after which many are eligible for breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The question often arises as to whether BCS, if achievable, provides adequate local control. We report the results of local recurrence (LR) from the I-SPY 1 Trial in the setting of maximal multidisciplinary treatment where approximately 50 % of patients were treated with BCS.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the I-SPY 1 Trial. Women with tumors ≥3 cm from nine clinical breast centers received neoadjuvant doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel followed by definitive surgical therapy, and radiation at physician discretion. LR following mastectomy and BCS were analyzed in relation to clinical characteristics and response to therapy as measured by residual cancer burden.

RESULTS

Of the 237 patients enrolled in the I-SPY 1 Trial, 206 were available for analysis. Median tumor size was 6.0 cm, and median follow-up was 3.9 years. Fourteen patients (7 %) had LR and 45 (22 %) had distant recurrence (DR). Of the 14 patients with LR, nine had synchronous DR; one had DR > 2 years later. Only four (2 % of evaluable patients) had LR alone. The rate of LR was low after mastectomy and after BCS, even in the setting of significant residual disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these patients at high risk for early recurrence, treated with maximal multidisciplinary treatment, had low LR. Recurrence was associated with aggressive biological features such as more advanced stage at presentation, where LR occurs most frequently in the setting of DR.

Intraoperative imprint cytology for breast cancer sentinel nodes: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND

Re-operative surgery is stressful for patients and is an additional burden to an already stretched public health system. Intraoperative confirmation of breast cancer metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) provides the necessary information for the surgeon to proceed with immediate axillary dissection, avoiding the need for a second operation, its associated cost, morbidity and adjuvant treatment delays. Our challenge was to implement a technique that was rapid, inexpensive and had a negligible false positive rate. The aim of this study was to determine whether touch imprint cytology (TIC) could reduce returns to theatre without compromising patient safety and pathology department and operating theatre efficiency.

METHODS

Intraoperative TIC was performed on bisected SLNs from 134 patients. Post-operatively, specimens were examined as haematoxylin and eosin-stained, paraffin-embedded 2-mm sections. Further sectioning and immunohistochemisty was performed on negative SLNs.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of TIC for metastases was 23.8%, the specificity was 100% and the accuracy was 76.1%. Ten patients with macrometastases and none with micrometastastes were detected intraoperatively. The sensitivity of TIC for detecting macrometastases was 34.5%, the accuracy was 78.4% and the specificity was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Ten patients avoided a subsequent surgery. The technique caused no theatre delays and the minimal cost was compensated for by the avoidance of a second procedure for a third of patients who definitively required axillary clearance. No patients had an unnecessary axillary clearance and no patients with micrometastases or isolated tumour cells were subjected to an immediate axillary clearance. It would be justifiable to continue this simple, low-cost and non-disruptive approach.

Docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (the TAC regimen): an effective adjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer

The introduction of taxanes in the armamentarium against breast cancer in the 1990s has been one of the landmarks in the treatment of this disease. Docetaxel in particular is considered one of the most active cytotoxic agents in metastatic breast cancer and has also been tested as adjuvant postsurgical therapy in earlier stages. A regimen including docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (the TAC regimen) was the first combination that demonstrated the efficacy of docetaxel in the adjuvant setting. This combination has been approved by regulatory agencies for adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer and is presently used worldwide. TAC is more toxic than the traditional anthracycline-containing combinations, but many of its side effects can be ameliorated with colony-stimulating growth factor support.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience

BACKGROUND

The estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 profile of a primary breast carcinoma plays a significant role in patient management and treatment. Because of the increasing utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy, surgically-resected carcinomas often show marked treatment effect. The aim of this study was to compare immunohistochemical (IHC) profiles (ER, PR, HER2, HER2 FISH) of primary breast carcinomas before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to assess the subsequent effects on hormone receptor status.

DESIGN

Primary breast carcinomas from 38 female patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy after needle core biopsy or fine needle aspiration diagnosis were included. Histologic data was collected for each case, including site, type, grade, tumor size (cm), pre- and post- neoadjuvant treatment IHC panel (ER, PR, HER2), and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2.

RESULTS

Of the 38 carcinomas studied, 45 % were positive for ER by IHC both pre- and post- neoadjuvant treatment (P=1.00). IHC studies for PR in these 38 patients showed 37% positivity for PR pre-neoadjuvant therapy and 21% positivity post-treatment (p=0.03). For 37 patients with HER2 IHC, 32% were positive pre-treatment, and 22% were positive post-treatment (P = 0.20). For 7 patients, HER2 FISH was positive in 71% pre-therapy and in 57% post-treatment (P=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Profiles for ER, HER2 IHC, and HER2 FISH were not significantly different in primary breast carcinomas before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further investigation is warranted to assess reproducibility of technique and investigate clinical implications of significant loss of PR status in treated patients.

A systematic review of the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant pharmacotherapy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Between 25 and 30% of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer are classified as high risk for an adverse prognosis. A significant number of these will progress to biochemical or clinical relapse. As there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment of these cases, a multimodal therapeutic approach, including radical prostatectomy, remains an option.

AREAS COVERED

The Pubmed/Medline database was searched to identify trials that have evaluated adjuvant and neoadjuvant pharmaceutical protocols combined with radical prostatectomy and provided information regarding efficacy and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Improvements in adverse pathological findings, following operations in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, have been reported in the majority of the reviewed studies. Furthermore, the addition of pharmacotherapy to radical prostatectomy has produced beneficial results in survival surrogates. However, no benefits in overall survival were observed with adjuvant or neoadjuvant protocols and toxicity was a concern, especially in combination regimens. New studies on the effects of current pharmacotherapy and of new agents on overall survival and quality of life, after defining well-established criteria for patient stratification and inclusion, are required urgently.

Randomized trial of adjuvant zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with high-risk breast cancer

PURPOSE

We present the results of a randomized multicenter clinical trial of adjuvant zoledronic acid (ZA) in postmenopausal women with high-risk breast cancer. The primary objective was change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at 1 year. Secondary objectives included change in calcaneal BMD, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with stage II/III breast cancer diagnosed up to 5 years previous were eligible and randomized to either observation or ZA 4 mg intravenous every 3 months. Bone mineral density testing was performed at 0, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight women were enrolled (36 ZA and 32 observation). The population was a median of 2 years from diagnosis and the majority received tamoxifen during the study. There was a significant difference in the mean change from baseline to 1 year follow-up for lumbar spine (increased by 4.28% ± 0.62%; P = .01), total femur (increased by 1.9% ± 0.4%; P = .03), trochanter (increased by 2.97% ± 0.69%; P = .03), and calcaneal BMD (increased by 2% ± 0.57%; P = .01) in favor of the ZA arm. No significant difference in the mean change for the femoral neck was seen. No significant differences in DFS or OS were observed.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid significantly improved the BMD at multiple skeletal sites in postmenopausal women largely on tamoxifen. No new safety signals were noted. There were insufficient events to comment on DFS or OS.

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy feasible in Chinese patients with invasive breast cancers?

BACKGROUND

A wide variation in the accuracy of performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer has been reported despite its increased use. This study aimed to be the first to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

A review of prospectively collected data from breast cancer patients who had SLNB after prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed. A combination of radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-albumin colloid (Pharmalucence, MA, USA) and Patent Blue V dye (Guerbet, France) was used to identify the SLN. SLNB was followed by standard axillary dissection in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients received SLNB from May 1999 to April 2006. A total of 78 patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by SLNB were recruited. The SLN identification rate, false-negative rate and accuracy rate were 83.3, 10.3 and 73.1%, respectively. Analysis was stratified into clinical and pathological response group. Location of the tumour was also found to be an important factor in affecting the false-negative rate (P= 0.019). For upper, outer quadrant tumour, five (32.3%, out of 16) patients presented with false-negative. Patients with more sentinel lymph node harvest had higher accuracy. A total of 22 patients had three or more lymph nodes harvested, and the false-negative rate was 21.7% (5 out of 23 patients) (P= 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study show that SLNB is feasible and applicable in Chinese patients with breast cancer with operable disease who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Feasibility study of safe breast conservation in large and locally advanced cancers with use of radiopaque markers to mark pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy tumor margins

BACKGROUND

The lack of objective documentation of pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) margins after chemotherapy is a major constraint in performing safe breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Using a novel method of marking pre-NACT tumor margins with indigenous silver wire markers, this prospective pilot study attempted to assess the feasibility of safe BCS in LABC patients by performing excision wide of the marked pre-NACT margins.

METHODS

LABC patients had sterile silver wire markers placed at all tumor margins percutaneously. Patients were then treated with NACT followed by wide local excision (WLE) incorporating pre-NACT margins (ex vivo on mastectomy specimen or in vivo in patients opting for BCS). The histology of the margins wide of the post-WLE cavity (pre-NACT) and post-NACT tumor was used to assess adequate disease clearance and safety of BCS.

RESULTS

Altogether, 40 stage III breast cancer patients (mean tumor size 7.9 cm) were studied; none had marker-related complications. Following NACT, the tumor size assessed by markers showed average regression by 1.5 cm. The pre-NACT margins were histologically negative in 95% of the surgical specimens. In 2 (5%) patients both pre-NACT and post-NACT margins were positive; post-NACT margins were infiltrated in 14 (35%).

CONCLUSIONS

The post-NACT WLE that is wide of the marked pre-NACT margins can achieve uninfiltrated margins in 95% of cases. If post-NACT margins are used to guide the WLE, 35% patients would have infiltrated margins, some of which would remain undetected, putting patients at high risk of local recurrence. This novel indigenous method of identifying tumor margins with sterile silver wire markers is safe, inexpensive, practical, and effective; and it may help perform safe BCS in a large proportion of LABC patients.

High‐Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Integrating Chemotherapy

Docetaxel (Taxotere); Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, http://www.aventispharma-us.com) is the first agent to significantly extend survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Because agents active in advanced cancers tend to be beneficial in earlier stage disease, docetaxel is now to be assessed, along with hormonal therapy, in the adjuvant setting among patients whose localized prostate cancer has features that put them at particular risk for recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Data from a pilot study suggest that neo-adjuvant treatment with docetaxel may be appropriate for selected high-risk patients and that such treatment can be undertaken without increasing surgical morbidity. Gene-expression profiling of tissue before and after docetaxel treatment is providing further insight into its effects. A randomized trial, conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, will evaluate neoadjuvant docetaxel in high-risk patients, whereby patients will be randomized to either immediate radical prostatectomy or surgery preceded by hormonal therapy plus docetaxel. Another large randomized trial will be evaluating the effect of adjuvant hormonal therapy with or without docetaxel in high-risk men after radical prostatectomy.