Presurgical treatment with somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly: effects on the remission and complication rates

Preoperative Medical Treatment for Patient with Acromegaly: yes or no?

Transsphenoidal surgery is the first-line treatment for acromegaly. However, several factors can modify surgical remission rates, such as the initial hormone levels, the size and invasiveness of the tumor, and the degree of experience of the surgeon. Physicians treating patients with acromegaly should thus consider how to improve surgical remission rates. As stated in recent guidelines, the major point is to consider that any patient with acromegaly should be referred to an expert neurosurgeon to maximize the chances of surgical sure. The benefits of presurgical medical treatment, mainly using somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), given 3 to 6 months before surgery, remain controversial. By normalizing growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, SRLs may improve the overall condition of the patient, thus decreasing anesthetic and surgical complications. By decreasing the tumor size and modifying the consistency of the tumor, SRLs might also make surgical excision easier. This is however theoretical as published data are contradictory on both points, and only limited data support the use of a systematical presurgical medical treatment. The aim of this review is to analyze the potential benefits and pitfalls of using presurgical medical treatment in acromegaly in view of the contradictory literature data. We also attempt to determine the profile of patients who might most benefit from this presurgical medical treatment approach as an individualized therapeutic management of acromegaly.

The Dose of Somatostatin Analogues during Pre-Surgical Treatment Is a Key Factor to Achieve Surgical Remission in Acromegaly

Purpose: to determine whether pre-surgical treatment using long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs) may improve surgical outcomes in acromegaly. Methods: retrospective study of 48 patients with acromegaly operated by endoscopic transsphenoidal approach and for first time. Surgical remission was evaluated based on the 2010 criteria. Results: most patients, 83.3% (n = 40), harbored macroadenomas and 31.3% (n = 15) invasive pituitary adenomas. In this case, 14 patients were treated with lanreotide LAR and 6 with octreotide LAR, median monthly doses of 97.5 [range 60–120] and 20 [range 20–30] mg, respectively, for at least 3 months preoperatively. Presurgical variables were comparable between pre-treated and untreated patients (p > 0.05). Surgical remission was more frequent in those pre-treated with monthly doses ≥90 mg of lanreotide or ≥30 mg of octreotide than in untreated or pre-treated with lower doses (OR = 4.64, p = 0.025). However, no differences were found between pre-treated and untreated patients when lower doses were included or between those treated for longer than 6 months compared to those untreated or pre-treated for shorter than 6 months. Similarly, no differences were found either in terms of surgical or endocrine complications (OR = 0.65, p = 0.570), independently of the doses and the duration of SSA treatment (p > 0.05). Conclusions: the dose of SSAs is a key factor during pre-surgical treatment, since the beneficial effects in surgical remission were observed with monthly doses equal or higher than 90 mg of lanreotide and 30 mg of octreotide, but not with lower doses.

Normal Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 During Somatostatin Receptor Ligand Treatment Predicts Surgical Cure in Acromegaly

CONTEXT

Treatment with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) is often given before pituitary surgery to patients with acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether the response to treatment with SRLs is predictive of surgical outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

We investigated 272 patients with acromegaly who had been treated with an SRL between 1990 and 2018.

INTERVENTION

All patients underwent pituitary surgery performed by a skilled neurosurgeon.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Outcome of pituitary surgery in patients who had normalization of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels during SRL therapy in comparison with patients who did not normalize IGF-1 levels.

RESULTS

Normalization of IGF-1 levels during SRL treatment occurred in 62 patients (22.8%) and was similar for the 3 different types of SRL (P = .88). Surgical remission occurred in 59.6% of the patients. Patients who normalized IGF-1 levels during SRL treatment had a higher probability of surgical cure than patients without IGF-1 normalization (83.9% vs 52.4%, respectively; P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that lack of cavernous sinus invasion, small maximum tumor diameter, and IGF-1 normalization during SRL therapy were the only factors independently associated with a favorable surgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the normalization of IGF-1 levels during treatment with SRLs is an independent predictive factor of a favorable surgical outcome. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, but an optimal response to medical therapy may be a characteristic of less aggressive tumors that are more likely to be entirely removed at surgery.

Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly in a clinical practice setting in Spain: the ACROPRAXIS program Delphi survey

AIM

The ACROPRAXIS program aims to describe the management of acromegaly in Spain and provide guidance.

METHODS

Ninety-three endocrinologists were organized into 13 panels to discuss the practical issues in managing acromegaly. Based on the key learnings, an online Delphi survey with 62 statements was performed, so those statements achieving consensus could be used as guidance. Statements were rated on a 9-point scale (9, full agreement; consensus > 66.6% of response in the same tertile).

RESULTS

Ninety-two endocrinologists (98.8%) answered two rounds of the survey (mean age 47.6 years; 59.8% women; median 18.5 years of experience). Consensus was achieved for 49 (79%) statements.

DIAGNOSIS

The levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGFI) is the preferred screening test. If IGFI levels 1-1.3 ULN, the test is repeated and growth hormone (GH) after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is assessed. A pituitary magnetic resonance is performed after biochemical diagnosis.

TREATMENT

Surgery is the first treatment choice for patients with microadenoma or macroadenoma with/without optical pathway compression. Pre-surgical somatostatin analogues (SSA) are indicated when surgery is delayed and/or to reduce anaesthesia-associated risks. After unsuccessful surgery, reintervention is performed if the residual tumor is resectable, while if non-resectable, SSA are administered. Follow-up First biochemical and clinical controls are performed 1-3 months after surgery. Disease remission is considered if random GH levels are < 1 µg/L or OGTT is < 1 or ≤ 0.4 µg/L, depending on the assay's sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Current clinical management for acromegaly is homogeneous across Spain and generally follows clinical guidelines.

Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) and Italian AACE Chapter Position Statement for Clinical Practice: Acromegaly - Part 2: Therapeutic Issues

Any newly diagnosed patient should be referred to a multidisciplinary team experienced in the treatment of pituitary adenomas. The therapeutic management of acromegaly always requires a personalized strategy. Normal age-matched IGF-I values are the treatment goal. Transsphenoidal surgery by an expert neurosurgeon is the primary treatment modality for most patients, especially if there are neurological complications. In patients with poor clinical conditions or who refuse surgery, primary medical treatment should be offered, firstly with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). In patients who do not reach hormonal targets with first-generation depot SSAs, a second pharmacological option with pasireotide LAR or pegvisomant (alone or combined with SSA) should be offered. Irradiation could be proposed to patients with surgical remnants who would like to be free from long-term medical therapies or those with persistent disease activity or tumor growth despite surgery or medical therapy. Since the therapeutic tools available enable therapeutic targets to be achieved in most cases, the challenge is to focus more on the quality of life.

The effects of pre-operative somatostatin analogue therapy on treatment cost and remission in acromegaly

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of preoperative somatostatin analogue (SSA) treatment on the annual cost of all acromegaly treatment modalities and on remission rates.

METHODS

The medical records of 135 patients with acromegaly who were followed at endocrinology clinic of Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty for at least 2 years after surgery between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 50.9 ± 25.7 months. Early remission was defined according to 3rd month values in patients who didn't achieve remission, and 6th month values in patients who achieved remission at the 3rd month after surgery. The early and late remission rates of the entire study population were 40% and 80.7%, respectively. The early remission of the preoperative SSA-treated group (61.5%) was significantly higher than SSA-untreated group (31.2%) (p = 0.002). The early remission of the preoperative SSA-treated patients with macroadenomas (52.2%) was also significantly higher than the SSA-untreated group (23.5%) (p = 0.02). In the subgroup analysis; this difference was much more pronounced in invasive macroadenomas (p = 0.002). There were no differences between the groups in terms of late remission.The median annual cost of all acromegaly treatment modalities in study population was €3788.4; the cost for macroadenomas was significantly higher than for microadenomas (€4125.0 vs. €3226.5, respectively; p = 0.03). Preoperative SSA use in both microadenomas and macroadenomas didn't alter the cost of treatment. The increase in the duration of preoperative medical treatment had no effect on early or late remissions (p = 0.09; p = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative medical treatment had no effect on the costs of acromegaly treatment. There was a benefical effect of pre-operative SSA use on early remission in patients with macroadenomas; however, this effect didn't persist long term.

Pretreatment with somatostatin analogs does not affect the anesthesiologic management of patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

Acromegaly may be associated with an increased risk of complex intraoperative management and anesthetic complications. No study addressed whether pretreatment with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) affects anesthesiologic management.

METHODS

We studied 211 consecutive acromegalic patients who had a recorded intraoperative computerized anesthetic record (ICAR) available for analysis. Ninety-six (45.5%) patients were SRL-pretreated while 115 patients were treatment naïve.

RESULTS

Treatment with SRLs reduced mean basal growth hormone level from 23.8 ± 4.2 to 5.9 ± 1.3 µg/L. Normalization of insulin-like growth factor-1 was achieved in 26 patients (27.1%). The frequency of comorbidities at surgery was similar in the two groups. Five patients with difficult intubation were naïve (4.3%) as compared with 5 SRL-pretreated patients (5.2%; P = 1.0). ICAR registration did not show any significant change of intraoperative vital parameters in the two groups of patients as well as in the intraoperative utilization of drugs. Total duration of anesthesia and surgery were similar in the two groups. Four patients with an intraoperative adverse event were naïve (3.5%) as compared with 4 SRL-pretreated patients (4.2%; P = 1.00). Remission of disease occurred in 83 of 114 naïve patients (72.8%) and in 57 of 93 SRL-pretreated patients (61.3%; P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

SRL-pretreatment of patients with acromegaly had no significant impact on intraoperative anesthesiologic management. Despite a better Cormack-Lehane score in SRL-pretreated than in naïve patients, the rate of difficult intubation was similar in both groups. SRL-pretreatment did not affect the rate of surgical remission or complications as well.

Early surgical intervention for patients with possible clinically silent somatotroph adenoma: a case series

Introduction

Clinically silent somatotroph adenoma is characterized by elevated serum growth hormone but without the clinical symptoms of acromegaly, and it is considered rare. The natural history is not well understood, progress to symptomatic is uncertain, and treatment strategy has not been established.

Case presentation

The first patient was a 48-year-old-Asian woman who presented with serum growth hormone 6.99 ng/ml and insulin-like growth factor 1 of 476 ng/ml, but no characteristic features of acromegaly. Five years after initial diagnosis, she presented with acromegalic facial appearance. Transsphenoidal surgery achieved gross total removal and endocrinological remission. The second patient was a 40-year-old-Asian woman who presented with serum growth hormone 31.14 ng/ml and insulin-like growth factor 1 of 709.6 ng/ml, but no characteristic features of acromegaly. Three years after initial diagnosis, she presented with acromegalic facial appearance. Transsphenoidal surgery achieved gross total removal and endocrinological remission. The third patient was a 64-year-old-Asian woman who presented with serum growth hormone 6.0 ng/ml and insulin-like growth factor 1 of 341 ng/ml, but no characteristic features of acromegaly. Eight months after initial diagnosis, hand enlargement was detected. Transsphenoidal surgery achieved gross total removal and endocrinological remission.

Conclusion

Due to its potential for evolving to symptomatic disease, the risks of surgery and observation for patients with somatotroph adenoma should be carefully compared from the viewpoint of better health outcome.

Pre-surgical medical treatment, a major prognostic factor for long-term remission in acromegaly

PURPOSE

To determine whether pre-surgical medical treatment (PSMT) using long-acting Somatostatin analogues in acromegaly may improve long-term surgical outcome and to determine decision making criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 110 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with acromegaly, who underwent surgery in a reference center (Marseille, France). The mean long-term follow-up period was 51.4 ± 36.5 (median 39.4) months. Sixty-four patients received PSMT during 3-18 (median 5) months before pituitary surgery. Remission was defined at early (3 months) evaluation and at last follow-up by GH nadir after oral glucose tolerance test < 0.4 µg/L and normal IGF-1.

RESULTS

Pretreated and non-pretreated groups were comparable for the main confounding factors except for higher IGF-1 at diagnosis in PSMT patients. Remission rates were significantly different in pretreated or not pretreated groups (61.1% vs. 36.6%, respectively at long-term evaluation). In multivariate analysis, PSMT was significantly linked to 3 months (p < 0.01) and long-term remission (p < 0.01). Duration of PSMT was not significantly different in cured or non-cured patients, at both evaluation times. PSMT appeared to be more beneficial for patients with an invasive tumor. No patient with a tumor greater than 18 mm or mean GH level exceeding 35 ng/mL at diagnosis was cured by surgery alone (vs. 8 and 9 patients in the pretreated group, respectively). Patients with PSMT showed more transient mild hyponatremia after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMT significantly improved short and long-term remission in patients with acromegaly, independent of its duration, especially in invasive adenomas.

Pediatric Pituitary Adenoma: Case Series, Review of the Literature, and a Skull Base Treatment Paradigm

Background  Pediatric pituitary adenoma is a rare skull base neoplasm, accounting for 3% of all intracranial neoplasms in children and 5% of pituitary adenomas. Compared with pituitary tumors in adults, secreting tumors predominate and longer disease trajectories are expected due to the patient age resulting in a natural history and treatment paradigm that is complex and controversial. Objectives  The aims of this study were to describe a large, single-institution series of pediatric pituitary adenomas with extensive long-term follow-up and to conduct a systematic review examining outcomes after pituitary adenoma surgery in the pediatric population. Methods  The study cohort was compiled by searching institutional pathology and operative reports using diagnosis and site codes for pituitary and sellar pathology, from 1956 to 2016. Systematic review of the English language literature since 1970 was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Results  Thirty-nine surgically managed pediatric pituitary adenomas were identified, including 15 prolactinomas, 14 corticotrophs, 7 somatotrophs, and 4 non-secreting adenomas. All patients underwent transsphenoidal resection (TSR) as the initial surgical treatment. Surgical cure was achieved in 18 (46%); 21 experienced recurrent/persistent disease, with secondary treatments including repeat surgery in 10, radiation in 14, adjuvant pharmacotherapy in 11, and bilateral adrenalectomy in 3. At the last follow-up (median 87 months, range 3-581), nine remained with recurrent/persistent disease (23%). Thirty-seven publications reporting surgical series of pediatric pituitary adenomas were included, containing 1,284 patients. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting tumors were most prevalent (43%), followed by prolactin (PRL)-secreting (37%), growth hormone (GH)-secreting (12%), and nonsecreting (7%). Surgical cure was reported in 65%. Complications included pituitary insufficiency (23%), permanent visual dysfunction (6%), chronic diabetes insipidus (DI) (3%), and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (4%). Mean follow-up was 63 months (range 0-240), with recurrent/persistent disease reported in 18% at the time of last follow-up. Conclusion  Pediatric pituitary adenomas are diverse and challenging tumors with complexities far beyond those encountered in the management of routine adult pituitary disease, including nuanced decision-making, a technically demanding operative environment, high propensity for recurrence, and the potentially serious consequences of hypopituitarism with respect to fertility and growth potential in a pediatric population. Optimal treatment requires a high degree of individualization, and patients are most likely to benefit from consolidated, multidisciplinary care in highly experienced centers.

Daily life reflections of acromegaly guidelines

PURPOSE

To determine the differences in acromegaly diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up among Turkish endocrinologists, and to investigate how the published guidelines are applied in clinical practice.

METHODS

The questionnaire was formatted as an electronic survey, conducted between November and December 2015, and sent weekly for 6 weeks via e-mail to 528 endocrinologists in Turkey.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 37.4 % of endocrinologists. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and nadir growth hormone level after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (nadir GH-OGTT) were the most commonly preferred methods for the initial diagnosis. A total of 49.5 % of the participants reported using preoperative medical therapy (MT) either routinely or on a case-to-case basis. Somatostatin analogs were the most commonly used drugs, both in pre- and postoperative MT. Disease activity following surgery was assessed in the 3rd postoperative month using IGF-1 levels. Similarly, IGF-1 monitoring was preferred in the follow-up period. Monitoring nadir GH-OGTT levels was the most commonly used method in the assessment of discordant test results. The dose titration was done at month 3 after the start of MT. Resistance to SRLs was considered after using the maximal dose for at least 6 months. Pegvisomant was generally used in second- and third-line therapy. Similarly, cabergoline was not preferred in monotherapy by the majority of participants. Radiotherapy was considered in patients with incomplete response to surgery and medical treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were subtle differences, clinical practice guidelines were usually followed among Turkish endocrinologists.

Somatostatin analogues in acromegaly and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: past, present and future

Acromegaly is a hormonal disorder that arises when the pituitary gland secretes excess growth hormone (GH), which in turn stimulates a concomitant increase in serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours that can secrete serotonin and a variety of peptide hormones that may cause characteristic symptoms known as carcinoid syndrome or other symptoms and hormonal hypersecretion syndromes depending on the tumour's site of origin. Current medical therapy for the treatment of acromegaly and GEP-NET involves the administration of somatostatin analogues that effectively suppress excess hormone secretion. After its discovery in 1979, octreotide became the first synthetic biologically stable somatostatin analogue with a short-acting formulation of octreotide introduced into clinical practice in the late 1980s. Lanreotide, another somatostatin analogue, became available in the mid-1990s initially as a prolonged-release formulation administered every 10 or 14 days. Long-acting release formulations of both octreotide (Sandostatin LAR and Novartis) and lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel, Ipsen), based on microparticle and nanoparticle drug-delivery technologies, respectively, were later developed, which allowed for once-monthly administration and improved convenience. First-generation somatostatin analogues remain one of the cornerstones of medical therapy in the management of pituitary and GEP-NET hormone hypersecretion, with octreotide having the longest established efficacy and safety profile of the somatostatin analogue class. More recently, pasireotide (Signifor), a next-generation multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue, has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of acromegaly. This review summarizes the development and clinical success of somatostatin analogues.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY DISEASE STATE CLINICAL REVIEW: MANAGEMENT OF ACROMEGALY PATIENTS: WHAT IS THE ROLE OF PRE-OPERATIVE MEDICAL THERAPY?

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a complex disease characterized by growth hormone (GH) excess originating in most cases from a pituitary tumor. The goals of treatment include removing the tumor or reducing tumor burden, normalizing GH secretion and insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, and preserving normal pituitary function if possible. Surgery by an experienced neurosurgeon is still considered first-line therapy, especially in cases with small tumors. In the last few decades, significant progress in the development of selective pharmacologic agents has greatly facilitated the management of active acromegaly, with agents such as somatostatin-receptor ligands (SRLs), GH-receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. In addition to adjuvant treatment, pre-operative medical therapy and primary therapy in de novo patients are increasingly employed.

METHODS

A United States National Library of Medicine PubMed search (through July 2014) was conducted for the following terms: acromegaly, pre-operative medical therapy, somatostatin-receptor ligands, and somatostatin analogs. Articles not in English and those not in peer-reviewed journals were excluded. In reviewing pertinent articles, focus was placed on biochemical and other postoperative outcomes of medical therapy.

RESULTS

An analysis of the full effect of pre-operative use of SRLs on surgical outcomes (remission rates and peri-operative complications) is limited by heterogeneity of methodology, low overall surgical cure rates, and different study designs. The assumption that SRL use prior to surgery reduces peri-operative surgical risk has yet to be proven. A variable degree of tumor shrinkage with preoperative SRLs is observed. Likewise, SRL treatment 3 months before surgery may improve surgical remission rates in the short term; however, positive results do not persist in the long term.

CONCLUSION

We consider that medical therapy before surgery could play a role in carefully selected patients, but treatment should be individualized. Primary medical therapy with a SRL may be considered in patients with macroadenomas without local mass effects on the optic chiasm, as SRLs have been shown to reduce tumor size and control GH hypersecretion. However, the data are insufficient to support general use of a SRL prior to surgery in order to improve post-surgery biochemical outcomes. Theoretically, patients with severe cardiac and respiratory complications due to acromegaly could potentially benefit from pre-operative SRLs in order to reduce peri-operative morbidity. Further investigation and investment in large randomized long-term clinical trials are needed to define the precise role and duration of pre-surgical medical treatment in acromegaly patients.

Pros and cons in endocrine practice: pre-surgical treatment with somatostatin analogues in acromegaly

The aim of this commentary is to balance the pros and cons for pre-surgical SSA treatment in a modern perspective ending up with a pragmatic recommendation for treatment based on the current evidence and expertise of the authors. Even though prospective and randomized studies in this particular area are hampered by obvious limitations, the interpretation of the four published trials has in general been in favor of pre-treatment with SSA, showing a better outcome following surgery. However, major drawbacks of these studies, such as non-optimal diagnostic criteria for cure, potential selection bias, and timing of the postoperative evaluation in SSA pre-treated patients, limit their overall interpretation. Three matched-controlled studies showed remarkably similar results with no apparent beneficial effect of SSA pre-treatment on surgical outcome. Both prospective, randomized studies and retrospective studies did not find any significant difference in the rate of endocrine and non-endocrine complications related to surgery, despite the beneficial clinical effects of SSA treatment in most acromegalic patients. The newly diagnosed patient with acromegaly should be carefully evaluated in the trans-disciplinary neuroendocrine team and treatment individualized accordingly. The issue of SSA pre-treatment to improve surgical outcome is yet to be settled and further methodologically sound studies are probably necessary to clarify this point.

Serial follow-up of presurgical treatment using pasireotide long-acting release with or without octreotide long-acting release for naïve active acromegaly

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the serial changes of GH and IGF-1 in seven patients with naïve, active acromegaly following presurgical treatment of the somatostatin analog pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) and octreotide LAR. The patients were treated with pasireotide LAR with or without octreotide LAR for two years and underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy. After treatment with the somatostatin analogs, the surgical cure rate was similar to that in patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery alone. Diabetes insipidus was not identified in any patients after the operation. Pasireotide LAR was effective on GH as well as IGF-1 suppression and tumor size decreasing when used as the primary therapy. Future large-population studies to investigate the surgical curative rate after presurgical treatment with somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly and macroadenomas close to the cavernous sinus are warranted. However, that hyperglycemia developed following pre-surgical treatment with pasireotide should take into consideration.

Clinical importance of achieving biochemical control with medical therapy in adult patients with acromegaly

In acromegaly, achieving biochemical control (growth hormone [GH] level <1.0 ng/mL and age- and sex-normalized levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1]) through timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment provides an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Diagnosis of acromegaly is challenging because it is rooted in observing subtle clinical manifestations, and it is typical for acromegaly to evolve for up to 10 years before it is recognized. This results in chronic exposure to elevated levels of GH and IGF-1 and delay in patients receiving appropriate treatment, which consequently increases mortality risk. In this review, the clinical impact of elevated GH and IGF-1 levels, the effectiveness of current therapies, and the potential role of novel treatments for acromegaly will be discussed. Clinical burden of acromegaly and benefits associated with management of GH and IGF-1 levels will be reviewed. Major treatment paradigms in acromegaly include surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy. With medical therapies, such as somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and GH receptor antagonists, a substantial proportion of patients achieve reduced GH and normalized IGF-1 levels. In addition, signs and symptoms, quality of life, and comorbidities have also been reported to improve to varying degrees in patients who achieve biochemical control. Currently, there are several innovative therapies in development to improve patient outcomes, patient use, and access. Timely biochemical control of acromegaly ensures that the patient can ultimately improve morbidity and mortality from this disease and its extensive consequences.

Medical Treatment of Acromegaly with Dopamine Agonists or Somatostatin Analogs

Treatment of acromegaly aims to correct (or prevent) tumor compression of surrounding tissues by excising the disease-causing lesion and reduce growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1 levels to normal values. When surgery (the usual first-line treatment) fails to correct GH/IGF-1 hypersecretion, medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs; particularly cabergoline) or somatostatin analogs (SAs) can be used. The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant is helpful in patients who are totally or partially resistant to SAs and can be given in association with both SAs and/or DAs. Thanks to this multistep therapeutic strategy, adequate hormonal disease control is achieved in most patients, giving them normal life expectancy. Comorbidities associated with acromegaly generally improve after treatment, but persistent sequelae may nonetheless impair quality of life.

Surgery induced hypopituitarism in acromegalic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results

PURPOSE

Hypopituitarism is a possible complication of the surgical treatment of acromegaly. However, there is a wide variability in the incidence rates of surgery-induced hypopituitarism. The purpose of this study was the systematic collection and synthesis of information on the incidence rates of hypopituitarism, panhypopituitarism, specific axis deficiencies and diabetes insipidus after surgery for acromegaly treatment.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed all the papers that have reported pituitary deficits after surgery for acromegaly published up until December 2014, in the PubMed database. We identified 92 studies enrolling 6988 patients. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence rates. We also performed several subgroup analyses to evaluate the impact of both surgical technique, and treatment prior to surgery, on the results.

RESULTS

The weighted incidence rates were 12.79 % for hypopituitarism (95 % CI 9.88-16.00 %), 2.50 % for panhypopituitarism (95 % CI 1.24-4.15 %), 6.50 % for ACTH deficiency (95 % CI 4.07-9.44 %), 4.39 % for TSH deficiency (95 % CI 2.99-6.04 %), 6.70 % for FSH/LH deficiency (95 % CI 3.89-10.17 %), 14.95 % for GH deficiency (95 % CI 7.25-24.64 %), 10.05 % for transient (95 % CI 7.18-13.33 %) and 2.42 % for permanent diabetes insipidus (95 % CI 1.70-3.27 %).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides new data on the incidence rates of hypopituitarism, specific pituitary axis deficiencies and diabetes insipidus after surgical treatment of acromegaly. Somatotroph function appears to be more prone to deficit than the other axes. However, there is a high heterogeneity between studies and several factors may influence the incidence of hypopituitarism.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of preoperative treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analogue on surgical outcome

CONTEXT

There is no uniform standard of care for acromegaly. Due to the high costs involved, steps must be taken to ensure the cost-effective delivery of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Taking the results of an earlier meta-analysis as a starting point, this study aims to determine whether treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogue (SSA) prior to surgery improves the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of acromegaly.

METHODS

The results are presented as an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) immediately after surgery, for the following year and over the next four decades. The cure rates percentage (95% CI) for the three randomized prospective controlled trials were 44.4% (34.2-54.7) and 18.2% (10.1-26.3) for preoperative treated and untreated patients respectively. The cost of pharmacological treatments was based on the number of units prescribed, dose and length of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean (95% CI) ICER immediately after surgery was €17,548 (12,007-33,250). In terms of the postoperative SSA treatment, the ICER changes from positive to negative before two years after surgery. One decade after surgery the ICER per patient/year was €-9973 (-18,798; -6752) for postoperative SSA treatment and €-31,733 (-59,812; -21,483) in the case of postoperative pegvisomant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In centres without optimal surgical results, preoperative treatment of GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas with SSA not only shows a significant improvement in the surgical results, but is also highly cost-effective, with an ICER per patient/year one decade after surgery, of between €-9973 (-18,798; -6752) and €-31,733 (-59,812; -21,483) for SSA and pegvisomant respectively.

60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: Acromegaly

Acromegaly (ACM) is a chronic, progressive disorder caused by the persistent hypersecretion of GH, in the vast majority of cases secreted by a pituitary adenoma. The consequent increase in IGF1 (a GH-induced liver protein) is responsible for most clinical features and for the systemic complications associated with increased mortality. The clinical diagnosis, based on symptoms related to GH excess or the presence of a pituitary mass, is often delayed many years because of the slow progression of the disease. Initial testing relies on measuring the serum IGF1 concentration. The oral glucose tolerance test with concomitant GH measurement is the gold-standard diagnostic test. The therapeutic options for ACM are surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy (RT). The outcome of surgery is very good for microadenomas (80-90% cure rate), but at least half of the macroadenomas (most frequently encountered in ACM patients) are not cured surgically. Somatostatin analogs are mainly indicated after surgical failure. Currently their routine use as primary therapy is not recommended. Dopamine agonists are useful in a minority of cases. Pegvisomant is indicated for patients refractory to surgery and other medical treatments. RT is employed sparingly, in cases of persistent disease activity despite other treatments, due to its long-term side effects. With complex, combined treatment, at least three-quarters of the cases are controlled according to current criteria. With proper control of the disease, the specific complications are partially improved and the mortality rate is close to that of the background population.

Preoperative somatostatin analogues versus direct transsphenoidal surgery for newly-diagnosed acromegaly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the GRADE system

Whether the preoperative use of somatostatin analogues (SA) improves surgical outcomes in acromegaly is still a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials that compared the short-term outcomes of preoperative use of SA (Pre-SA) with direct TSS (No-SA) for the treatment of newly diagnosed acromegaly.

METHODS

Embase, Pubmed, Lilacs, and Central Cochrane were used as our data sources. The primary outcomes were no need for any adjuvant treatment 3 months after surgery, based on biochemical results (GH nadir after OGTT <1 μg/L and normal IGF-1 for age and gender), quality of life and mortality. The included trials were analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

A total of 2.099 references were identified and two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts. From the 14 potentially eligible studies, four were included and ten were excluded due to lack of randomization or different outcomes. A pool of 261 patients was randomly assigned to Pre-SA or No-SA. Meta-analysis of IGF1 normalization showed a significant difference in favor of Pre-SA (RR 2.47; 95% CI 1.66, 3.77). Adding a GH nadir on OGTT ≤1 μg/L, we found a RR of 2.15 (95% CI 1.39, 3.33). Quality of evidence for no need of adjuvant postoperative treatment was moderate, but for improving quality of life was very low and for mortality was absent.

CONCLUSION

Pre-SA increases the chance of biochemical control of acromegaly 3 months after TSS in patients harboring GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas.

Treatment of acromegaly in the era of personalized and predictive medicine

Acromegaly is a chronic disorder usually diagnosed late in the disease evolution. Such delayed diagnosis, together with the inability to achieve the treatment goals of normalizing biochemical disease markers and controlling tumour mass may result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are accepted as first-line medical therapy or as second-line therapy in patients undergoing unsuccessful surgery and are considered a cornerstone in the treatment of acromegaly. However, because a high percentage of patients experience SSA medical treatment failure, the identification of biomarkers associated with a successful or unsuccessful response to all classes of medical therapy would help in the choice of treatment and potentially allow for a quicker normalization of biochemical parameters. The current treatment algorithms for acromegaly are based upon a "trial-and-error" approach with additional treatment options provided when disease is not controlled. In many other diseases, therapeutic algorithms have been evolving towards personalized treatment with the medication that best matches individual disease characteristics, using biomarkers that identify therapeutic response. Additionally, a personalized approach to complementary treatment of comorbidities present in the acromegalic patient is also required. This review will discuss the development of a potential treatment algorithm for acromegaly addressing the biochemical control of the disease as well of its associated comorbidities, under a personalized approach based upon markers of prognostic and predictive significance, such as tumour size, MRI adenoma signal, GH value after acute octreotide test, granular adenoma pattern, Ki-67, somatostatin receptor phenotype, aryl hydrocarbon-interacting protein expression, gsp mutations, RAF kinase activity, E-cadherin and beta-arrestin-1.

Preoperative somatostatin analogs treatment in acromegalic patients with macroadenomas. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the biochemical remission rate of presurgical somatostatin analogs treatment on acromegaly, but the remission criteria were diversed and the results were contradicting.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this paper is to provide enhanced evidence for the effectiveness of preoperative SSA treatment to improve on surgical results of macroadenomas in acromegaly.

DATA SOURCE

Literature is cited from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, dating from December, 1985 to August, 2013.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligibility criteria included patients with acromegaly caused by GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas, patients pretreated with somatostatin analogs versus direct surgery and a stricter remission criteria defined as the GH nadir<1μg/l during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the age- and sex- adjusted IGF-1 concentration was normal. Primary end points included Short term and long term postoperative biochemical remission.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

A total of 1421 publications were found by the electronic search. After full-text review, 8 were included in our study. 7 of them focus on the postoperative remission in short term; 3 of them focus on the outcomes in long term. For the analysis of the postoperative biochemical remission, a random effect model was used to account for differences.

RESULTS

The meta analysis shows that patients in the SSA pretreatment groups have had a more significantly cure rate than those in the direct surgery groups (RR=1.72, 95%CI: 1.14-2.60, P=0.009) with a short term follow-up. Subgroup analysis proves benefit from lanreotide pretreated groups (RR=2.27, 95%CI: 1.34-3.84, P=0.002) but not octreotide pretreated groups (RR=1.51, 95%CI: 0.82-2.75, P=0.183). No significant differences appeared between the two groups (RR=1.03, 95%CI: 0.86-1.24, P=0.751) with a long term follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

2 Retrospective trial was included and most of the trials included was designed as single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the analysis of this paper, the preoperative SSA treatment was beneficial in the group with short-term follow-up, while it was not advantageous in the group with long-term follow-up. For the limitations in this study, to drawn more solid conclusions, further large, randomized, multi-center, and long-term follow-up trials were required.

Should all patients with acromegaly receive somatostatin analogue therapy before surgery and, if so, for how long?

Current guidelines do not recommend the routine use of somatostatin analogue pretreatment prior to surgery in patients with growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumours. In theory, presurgical use of somatostatin analogues should improve metabolic control and reduce soft tissue swelling, leading to improved anaesthetic outcomes. Shrinkage of tumours prior to surgery might also improve surgical remission rates. Hence, this article addresses the question: Should all patients with acromegaly receive a somatostatin analogue prior to surgery? Clinical trials published before December 2013 were reviewed, although literature in this area remains relatively deficient. We conclude: (i) On the basis of limited data available, somatostatin analogue pretreatment does not improve anaesthetic or immediate postoperative outcomes (i.e. hospital stay, rates of surgical complications and postoperative pituitary dysfunction). (ii) Somatostatin analogues should be considered in all patients with growth hormone-secreting macroadenomas, including invasive macroadenomas, when the overall surgical remission rate for macroadenomas at the treating centre is below 50%. Four recent RCTs have demonstrated increased rates of surgical remission using such an approach. (iii) When deemed appropriate, patients should be treated with somatostatin analogues for at least 3 months before surgery; there is currently no evidence that treatment beyond 6 months provides any additional benefit. Patients with minimally invasive macroadenomas are those most likely to benefit in terms of improved surgical remission.

Clinical applications of somatostatin analogs for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

Excessive growth hormone (GH) is usually secreted by GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and causes gigantism in juveniles or acromegaly in adults. The clinical complications involving cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic systems lead to elevated morbidity in acromegaly. Control of serum GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 hypersecretion by surgery or pharmacotherapy can decrease morbidity. Current pharmacotherapy includes somatostatin analogs (SAs) and GH receptor antagonist; the former consists of lanreotide Autogel (ATG) and octreotide long-acting release (LAR), and the latter refers to pegvisomant. As primary medical therapy, lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR can be supplied in a long-lasting formulation to achieve biochemical control of GH and IGF-1 by subcutaneous injection every 4-6 weeks. Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR provide an effective medical treatment, whether as a primary or secondary therapy, for the treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenoma; however, to maximize benefits with the least cost, several points should be emphasized before the application of SAs. A comprehensive assessment, especially of the observation of clinical predictors and preselection of SA treatment, should be completed in advance. A treatment process lasting at least 3 months should be implemented to achieve a long-term stable blood concentration. More satisfactory surgical outcomes for noninvasive macroadenomas treated with presurgical SA may be achieved, although controversy of such adjuvant therapy exists. Combination of SA and pegvisomant or cabergoline shows advantages in some specific cases. Thus, an individual treatment program should be established for each patient under a full evaluation of the risks and benefits.

Surgical approach to pituitary tumors

Pituitary surgery is a continuously evolving specialty of neurosurgery that requires precise anatomical knowledge, technical skills, and an integrated appreciation of pituitary pathophysiology. It involves close cooperation between different specialists, i.e., the endocrinologist, neurosurgeon, neuroradiologist, pathologist, ophthalmologist, and others. It is currently possible to manage many of the different pituitary syndromes with more than one option, including medical, surgical, and radiotherapeutic options, either alone or in various combinations. In recent decades, the transsphenoidal midline route became the standard approach to the pituitary area, this being a less traumatic direct route to the sella, avoiding brain retraction and providing excellent visualization, with a lower morbidity and mortality rate as compared to transcranial procedures. Most pituitary adenomas can be managed and removed through a standard transsphenoidal approach, either microscopic or endoscopic. More recently, the introduction of the endoscope in the extended endoscopic endonasal approach has become more widespread. Here we report current indications and give a step-by-step account of the surgical techniques used in pituitary surgery, focusing on the "dangerous keypoints". We also describe possible complications of each kind of procedure.

Place of preoperative treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analog on surgical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Context

Transsphenoidal neurosurgery is the accepted first-line treatment of acromegaly in the majority of patients. Previous studies addressing preoperative somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment and subsequent surgical cure rates are conflicting, reporting either benefits or no significant differences.

Objective

The aim of this study, based on a meta-analysis of all published reports, was to investigate whether treatment with SSA before surgery improves the surgical outcome of acromegaly.

Data Sources

All studies of preoperative treatment of acromegaly with SSA were systematically reviewed up to December 2011. We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar electronic databases. Study Selection: The primary endpoint was the biochemical postoperative cure rate. We identified 286 studies, out of which 10 studies (3.49%) fulfilling the eligibility criteria were selected for analysis; five retrospective studies with a control group, two prospective non-randomized trials, and three prospective controlled trials. The meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model.

Data Extraction

Data were extracted from published reports by two independent observers. Data Synthesis: A borderline effect was detected in the analysis of all of the trials with control groups, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) for biochemical cure with SSA treatment of 1.62 (95% CI, 0.93–2.82). In the analysis of the three prospective controlled trials, a statistically significant effect was idenfified OR: 3.62 (95% CI, 1.88–6.96).

Conclusions

Preoperative treatment with SSA og GH-secreting pituitary adenomas shows a significant improvement on surgical results. This meta-analysis suggests that in centers without optimal results all patients with a GH-secreting pituitary macroadenoma should be treated with a long-acting SSA prior to surgical treatment.

Changes in acromegaly treatment over four decades in Spain: analysis of the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (REA)

Since 1997 there is an online National Registry of acromegalic patients in Spain (REA). We aimed to study changes in acromegaly treatment and outcomes over the last four decades in Spain. In REA clinical and biochemical data are collected at diagnosis and updated every one to 2 years. We analyzed the first treatment received and the different treatments administered according to decade of diagnosis of acromegaly: prior to 1980, 1980-1989, 1990-1999 and 2000-2009. Surgical cure rates according to pretreatment with long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) were also analyzed. 1,658 patients were included of which 698 had accurate follow-up data. Treatment of acromegaly changed over time. Surgery was the main treatment option (83.8 %) and medical treatment was widely used (74.7 %) both maintained over decades, while radiation therapy declined (62.8, 61.6, 42.2 and 11.9 % over decades, p < 0.001). First treatment type also changed: surgery was the first line option up until the last decade in which medical treatment was preferred (p < 0.001). Radiotherapy was barely used as first treatment. Treatment combinations changed over time (p < 0.001). The most common treatment combination (surgery plus medical therapy), was received by 24.4, 16.4, 25.3 and 56.5 % of patients over decades. Medical treatment alone was performed in 7.3, 6, 7.2 and 14.7 % over decades. Type of medical treatment also changed, SRLs becoming the first medical treatment modality in the last decades, whereas dopamine agonist use declined (p < 0.001). Surgical cure rates improved over decades (21, 21, 36 and 38 %, p = 0.002) and were not influenced by SRL pre-surgical use. Acromegaly treatment has changed in Spain in the last four decades. Surgery has been the main treatment option for decades; however, medical therapy has replaced surgery as first line in the last decade and radiotherapy rates have clearly declined. SRLs are the most used medical treatment.

A comprehensive study of clinical, biochemical, radiological, vascular, cardiac, and sleep parameters in an unselected cohort of patients with acromegaly undergoing presurgical somatostatin receptor ligand therapy

CONTEXT

Attainment of safe GH and IGF-1 levels is a central goal of acromegaly management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which reductions in GH and IGF-1 concentrations correlate with amelioration of radiological, metabolic, vascular, cardiac, and respiratory sequelae in a single unselected patient cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, within-subject comparison in 30 patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly (15 women and 15 men: mean age, 54.3 years; range, 23-78 years) before and after 24 weeks of lanreotide Autogel (ATG) therapy.

RESULTS

Reductions in GH and IGF-1 concentrations and tumor volume were observed in all but 2 patients (median changes [Δ]: GH, -6.88 μg/L [interquartile range -16.78 to -3.32, P = .000001]; IGF-1, -1.95 × upper limit of normal [-3.06 to -1.12, P = .000002]; and pituitary tumor volume, -256 mm(3) [-558 to -72.5, P = .0002]). However, apnea/hypopnea index scores showed highly variable responses (P = .11), which were independent of ΔGH or ΔIGF-1, but moderately correlated with Δweight (R(2) = 0.42, P = .0001). Although systolic (P = .33) and diastolic (P = .76) blood pressure were unchanged, improvements in arterial stiffness (aortic pulse wave velocity, -0.4 m/s [-1.2 to +0.2, P = .046]) and endothelial function (flow mediated dilatation, +1.73% [-0.32 to +6.19, P = .0013]) were observed. Left ventricular mass index regressed in men (-11.8 g/cm(2) [-26.6 to -1.75], P = .019) but not in women (P = .98). Vascular and cardiac changes were independent of ΔGH or ΔIGF-1 and also showed considerable interindividual variation. Metabolic parameters were largely unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Presurgical ATG therapy lowers GH and IGF-1 concentrations, induces tumor shrinkage, and ameliorates/reverses cardiac, vascular, and sleep complications in many patients with acromegaly. However, responses vary considerably between individuals, and attainment of biochemical control cannot be assumed to equate to universal complication control.

[Epidemiology of acromegaly in Spain]

Epidemiology of acromegaly in Spain does not differ from that reported in other published series. Prevalence rate is approximately 60 cases per million, peak incidence occurs in middle age, more women are affected (61%), and there is a substantial delay between occurrence of the first symptoms and diagnosis. Studies REA (Spanish Acromegaly Registry) and OASIS analyzed the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management of the disease in Spain. Surgery, performed in more than 80% of patients, has been (and continues to be) the main treatment for the past four decades. In the past decade, however, more patients have received somatostatin analogs (SSAs) as first-line treatment. Use of radiation therapy has significantly decreased in recent decades. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the most commonly used drugs, administered to 85% of patients; however, only 12%-15% continue on drug treatment alone. The surgical remission rate was 38.4% in the last decade, with a significant improvement over decades. Preoperative treatment with SSAs has no influence on surgical cure rates. Second-line therapies used after surgical failure in the past decade included SSAs in 49% of patients, repeat surgery in 27%, radiotherapy in 11%, pegvisomant in 15%, and dopamine agonists in 5%. Mean cost of acromegaly treatment was 9.668€ (data estimated in 2009 and adjusted in 2010), of which 71% was due to the cost of SSAs. Patients treated with pegvisomant have a more aggressive form of the disease and higher comorbidity rates.

Octreotide long-acting repeatable for acromegaly

Acromegaly remains a therapeutic challenge for the endocrinologist. Among the available therapeutic options, octreotide long-acting repeatable (Sandostatin(®) LAR(®), Novartis) plays a chief role, both as a primary therapy and as an adjuvant treatment after unsuccessful surgery. A plethora of papers and a meta-analysis have demonstrated its efficacy in: control of clinical picture; achievement of safe growth hormone and normal age-matched IGF-I levels (both factors associated with restoration of normal life expectancy) in 60-70% of patients; control of tumor volume (with real shrinkage in over half of cases); and halt or reversal of most acromegaly-associated comorbidities. Treatment is well tolerated in most patients and can be safely prolonged for many years if required.

[Treatment of acromegaly: a critical analysis of the last ten years]

The ten previous years in terms of acromegaly treatment were essentially characterized by the experience accumulated with new formulations of somatostatin analogues or new drugs such GH-receptor antagonists recently available. Surgery remains the first-line treatment and its results did not change despite the generalization of endoscopy, which mainly seems to decrease local side-effects. The setting of radiotherapy was essentially modified by the increasing use of gamma-knife or stereotactic radiotherapy; however, their results are essentially the same as the classic fractionated, conventional radiotherapy and nobody knows if it will decrease the side-effects of this therapeutic modality. Nevertheless, thanks to a multistep therapeutic strategy, combining the different therapeutic modalities, it has become very rare for acromegaly not to be controlled in a patient.

Results of gamma knife radiosurgery in acromegaly

Objective. Single-session radiosurgery with Gamma Knife (GK) may be a potential adjuvant treatment in acromegaly. We analyzed the safety and efficacy of GK in patients who had previously received maximal surgical debulking at our hospital. Methods. The study was a retrospective analysis of hormonal, radiological, and ophthalmologic data collected in a predefined protocol from 1994 to 2009. The mean age at treatment was 42.3 years (range 22-67 yy). 103 acromegalic patients participated in the study. The median follow-up was 71 months (IQ range 43-107). All patients were treated with GK for residual or recurrent GH-secreting adenoma. Results. Sixty-three patients (61.2%) reached the main outcome of the study. The rate of remission was 58.3% at 5 years (95% CI 47.6-69.0%). Other 15 patients (14.6%) were in remission after GK while on treatment with somatostatin analogues. No serious side effects occurred after GK. Eight patients (7.8%) experienced a new deficit of pituitary function. New cases of hypogonadism, hypothyroidism, and hypoadrenalism occurred in 4 of 77 patients (5.2%), 3 of 95 patients (3.2%), and 6 of 100 patients at risk (6.0%), respectively. Conclusion. In a highly selected group of acromegalic patients, GK treatment had good efficacy and safety.

Medical therapy of acromegaly

This paper outlines the present status of medical therapy of acromegaly. Indications for permanent postoperative treatment, postirradiation treamtent to bridge the interval until remission as well as primary medical therapy are elaborated. Therapeutic efficacy of the different available drugs-somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), dopamine agonists, and the GH antagonist Pegvisomant-is discussed, as are the indications for and efficacy of their respective combinations. Information on their mechanism of action, and some pharmakokinetic data are included. Special emphasis is given to the difficulties to define remission criteria of acromegaly due to technical assay problems. An algorithm for medical therapy in acromegaly is provided.

Pharmacological management of acromegaly: a current perspective

Acromegaly is a chronic disorder of enhanced growth hormone (GH) secretion and elevated insulin-like growth factor–I (IGF-I) levels, the most frequent cause of which is a pituitary adenoma. Persistently elevated GH and IGF-I levels lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. Treatment goals include complete removal of the tumor causing the disease, symptomatic relief, reduction of multisystem complications, and control of local mass effect. While transsphenoidal tumor resection is considered first-line treatment of patients in whom a surgical cure can be expected, pharmacological therapy is playing an increased role in the armamentarium against acromegaly in patients unsuitable for or refusing surgery, after failure of surgical treatment (inadequate resection, cavernous sinus invasion, or transcapsular intraarachnoid invasion), or in select cases as primary treatment. Three broad drug classes are available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and GH receptor antagonists.

Somatostatin analogs are considered as the first-line pharmacological treatment of acromegaly, although efficacy varies among the different formulations. Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) appears to be more efficacious than lanreotide sustained release (SR). Lanreotide Autogel (ATG) has been shown to result in similar biological control as octreotide LAR, and there may be a benefit in switching from one to the other in some cases of treatment failure. The novel multireceptor somatostatin analog pasireotide, currently in Phase II clinical trials, also shows promise in the treatment of acromegaly. Dopamine agonists have been the earliest and most widely used agents in the treatment of acromegaly but have been found to be less effective than somatostatin analogs. In this class of drugs, cabergoline has shown greater efficacy and tolerability than bromocriptine. Dopamine agonists have the advantage of oral administration, resulting in increased use in select patient groups. Selective GH receptor antagonists, such as pegvisomant, act by blocking the effects of GH, resulting in decreased IGF-I production despite persistent elevation of GH serum levels. Thus far, tumor growth has not been a concern during pegvisomant therapy. However, combination treatment with somatostatin analogs may counteract these effects. The authors discuss the latest guidelines for biochemical cure and highlight the efficacy of combination therapy. In addition, the effects of pharmacological presurgical treatment on surgical outcome are explored.

The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome

The Endocrine Tumor Summit convened in December 2008 to address 6 statements prepared by panel members that reflect important questions in the treatment of acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome. Data pertinent to each of the statements were identified through review of pertinent literature by one of the 9-member panel, enabling a critical evaluation of the statements and the evidence supporting or refuting them. Three statements addressed the validity of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations as indicators or predictors of disease in acromegaly. Statements regarding the effects of preoperative somatostatin analog use on pituitary surgical outcomes, their effects on hormone and symptom control in carcinoid syndrome, and the efficacy of extended dosing intervals were reviewed. Panel opinions, based on the level of available scientific evidence, were polled. Finally, their views were compared with those of surveyed community-based endocrinologists and neurosurgeons.

Medical therapy of acromegaly in Turkey

Acromegaly is associated with multiple co-morbidities and risk of premature mortality. Mortality rate of acromegalic patients is similar to that of the general population when normal GH levels are achieved. Surgery is the mainstay of acromegaly but when surgery fails to achieve disease control, or when surgery is impossible or contraindicated, patients are offered medical therapy and/or radiotherapy. Current medical therapy modalities were revised in this short review.

A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The Acromegaly Consensus Group met in April 2009 to revisit the guidelines on criteria for cure as defined in 2000.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 74 neurosurgeons and endocrinologists with extensive experience of treating acromegaly. EVIDENCE/CONSENSUS PROCESS: Relevant assays, biochemical measures, clinical outcomes, and definition of disease control were discussed, based on the available published evidence, and the strength of consensus statements was rated.

CONCLUSIONS

Criteria to define active acromegaly and disease control were agreed, and several significant changes were made to the 2000 guidelines. Appropriate methods of measuring and achieving disease control were summarized.

Effect of presurgical long-acting octreotide treatment in acromegaly patients with invasive pituitary macroadenomas: a prospective randomized study

Therapeutic effects of presurgical long-acting octreotide treatment on tumor shrinkage, and short- and long-term postoperative GH and IGF-1 levels of acromegaly patients with invasive pituitary macroadenomas were investigated prospectively in Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China. Thirty-nine untreated acromegaly patients, all with invasive pituitary macroadenomas, were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (n=19), and control group (n=20). Patients in the experimental group received a three-month course of long-acting octreotide treatment before transsphenoidal surgery; the control group underwent surgery directly. Tumor shrinkage after drug treatment and short- and long-term postoperative GH and IGF-1 levels were analyzed in the two groups. Long-acting octreotide treatment reduced tumor size from 7893 ± 6450 to 4794 ± 4682 mm(3). Mean shrinkage rate was 37.4 ± 30.9%. GH and IGF-1 levels of the experimental group were lower than the control group at 3 months, 6 months after surgery, and after long-term follow-up. Remission rate (both GH and IGF-1 normal) of the experimental group was higher at 3 and 6 months follow-up, but exhibited no advantage in long-term follow-up. In the experimental group, the total resection rate was higher in patients whose Hardy-Knosp grading decreased to ≤ 2 than those whose Hardy-Knosp grading is still ≥ 3 after drug pretreatment. In conclusion, presurgical long-acting octreotide treatment effectively reduces tumor size and invasion, which helps enhance early remission rates of invasive macroadenomas by transsphenoidal surgery, but does not appear to improve the long-term cure rate.

Medical therapy of acromegaly: efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogues

Acromegaly is a chronic disease with signs and symptoms due to growth hormone (GH) excess. The most frequent cause of acromegaly is a GH-producing pituitary adenoma. Chronic GH excess is accompanied by long-term complications of the locomotor (arthrosis) and cardiovascular (atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy) systems and is, when untreated, associated with an increased mortality. The aim of treatment of acromegaly is to improve symptoms, to achieve local tumour mass control, and to decrease morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy and radiotherapy. Transsphenoidal surgery is the first choice of treatment when a definitive cure can be achieved, particularly in the case of microadenomas and when decompression of surrounding structures (optic chiasm, ophthalmic motor nerves) is indicated. Primary medical therapy has been increasingly applied in recent years, especially when a priori chances of surgical cure are low (because of adenoma size and localization) and in patients with advanced age and/or serious co-morbidity. In addition, preoperative primary medical therapy may result in tumour shrinkage, facilitating tumour resection, and may reduce perioperative complications due to GH excess. Within the spectrum of medical therapy, long-acting somatostatin analogues (somatostatins) are considered as first-line treatment. Treatment with somatostatin analogues results in GH control in approximately 60% of patients. In addition, somatostatin analogues induce tumour shrinkage in 30-50% of patients, particularly when applied as primary therapy. Prolonged treatment with somatostatin analogues appears to be safe and is usually well tolerated. The currently available somatostatin analogues, octreotide and lanreotide, seem to be equally effective; however, this should still be evaluated in prospective, randomized trials evaluating efficacy with respect to GH control and tumour shrinkage. In patients with an insufficient clinical and biochemical response to somatostatin analogues, combination therapy with dopamine receptor agonists or the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant usually leads to disease control. New developments in the medical therapy of acromegaly include the universal somatostatin receptor agonist pasireotide, which has a broader affinity for all somatostatin receptor (sst) subtypes compared with the currently available somatostatin analogues with preferential affinity for the sst2 receptor, and chimeric compounds that interact with both somatostatin and dopamine receptors with synergizing effects on GH secretion.

From somatostatin to octreotide LAR: evolution of a somatostatin analogue

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is characterized by overproduction of growth hormone (GH) by the pituitary gland. GH stimulates the synthesis of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and the somatic growth and metabolic dysfunction that characterize acromegaly are a consequence of elevated GH and IGF-I levels. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare, slow-growing neoplasms that have usually metastasized by the time of diagnosis. The majority of GEP-NETs are carcinoid tumors whose syndrome is caused by the hypersecretion of biogenic amines, peptides and polypeptides responsible for the principal symptoms of diarrhea and flushing.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for preclinical and clinical studies of octreotide (Sandostatin* ), a potent synthetic somatostatin analogue, in patients with acromegaly or GEP-NETs.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the 20 years of clinical experience with octreotide and the impact it has made in patients with acromegaly or GEP-NETs.

RESULTS

Octreotide has proven to be an essential component in the management strategy of acromegaly and GEP-NETs over the past 20 years. The multiple beneficial effects of octreotide throughout the body, combined with its established safety profile (the most common adverse effects are injection-site pain and gastrointestinal events), have made it an appealing option for clinicians. The advent of the long-acting release (LAR) formulation of octreotide provided additional benefits to patients through monthly administration, while maintaining the efficacy and tolerability profile of the daily subcutaneous formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide is a potent synthetic somatostatin analogue that has become the mainstay of medical therapy for tumor control in neuroendocrine disorders such as acromegaly and GEP-NETs. The development of octreotide LAR offered a further advancement; less frequent dosing provided valuable benefits in quality of life to patients, with equivalent efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, recent results from the PROMID study have confirmed the antiproliferative effect of octreotide LAR in patients with well-differentiated metastatic GEP-NETs of the midgut. New therapeutic uses of octreotide are currently under investigation in a variety of clinical settings.

Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update

OBJECTIVE

The Acromegaly Consensus Group reconvened in November 2007 to update guidelines for acromegaly management.

PARTICIPANTS

The meeting participants comprised 68 pituitary specialists, including neurosurgeons and endocrinologists with extensive experience treating patients with acromegaly. EVIDENCE/CONSENSUS PROCESS: Goals of treatment and the appropriate imaging and biochemical and clinical monitoring of patients with acromegaly were enunciated, based on the available published evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The group developed a consensus on the approach to managing acromegaly including appropriate roles for neurosurgery, medical therapy, and radiation therapy in the management of these patients.

Does first-line surgery still have its place in the treatment of acromegaly?

Transsphenoidal surgery is currently the first-line treatment of acromegaly. Remission is observed in 80 to 90% microadenomas, 50 to 60% non-invasive macroadenomas, and less than 20% invasive macroadenomas. Predictive factors include age, maximal size of the adenoma, cavernous sinus invasion, initial hormone levels and neurosurgeon's experience. Complications are rare, with about 5% definitive diabetes insipidus and 10% of new anterior pituitary hormone deficits. Somatostatin agonist pretreatment can be proposed as it decreases tumor volume in about 25% cases and might reduce the rate of immediate postsurgical complications; however, there is no obvious difference in surgical remission rate whether patients are pretreated or not. Debulking surgery can also be proposed in very large macroadenomas incompletely controlled by somatostatin agonists or resistant to medical treatment, as it was shown to facilitate somatostatin agonist efficacy in more than 50% cases.