Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex via C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pedicle screw fixation in a multicenter clinical experience in 102 patients: modification of the Harms and Goel techniques

The C2 isthmus screw provided sufficient biomechanical stability in the setting of atlantoaxial dislocation-a finite element study

BACKGROUND

The emerging of the C2 isthmus screw fixation technique is gaining popularity in the setting of atlantoaxial dislocation or other conditions requiring fixation of C2. However, the biomechanical stability of this fixation is poorly understood.

PURPOSE

To compare and elucidate the biomechanical stability of C2 pedicle screw (C2PS), C2 isthmus screw (C2IS) and C2 short isthmus screw (C2SIS) fixation techniques in atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD).

METHOD

A three-dimensional finite element model (FEM) from occiput to C3 was established and validated from a healthy male volunteer. Three FEMs, C1 pedicle screw (PS)-C2PS, C1PS-C2IS, C1PS-C2SIS were also constructed. The range of motion (ROM) and the maximum von Mises stress under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation loading were analyzed and compared. The pullout strength of the three fixations for C2 was also evaluated.

RESULT

C1PS-C2IS model showed the greatest decrease in ROM with flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. C1PS-C2PS model showed the least ROM reduction under all loading conditions than both C2IS and C2SIS. The C1PS-C2PS model had the largest von Mises stress on the screw under all directions followed by C1PS-C2SIS, and lastly the C1PS-C2IS. Under axial rotation and lateral bending loading, the three models showed the maximum and minimum von Mises stress on the screw respectively. The stress of the three models was mainly located in the connection of the screw and rod. Overall, the maximum screw pullout strength for C2PS, C2IS and C2SIS were 729.41N, 816.62N, 640.54N respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with atlantoaxial dislocations, the C2IS fixation provided comparable stability, with no significant stress concentration. Furthermore, the C2IS had sufficient pullout strength when compared with C2PS and C2SIS. C2 isthmus screw fixation may be a biomechanically favourable option in cases with AAD. However, future clinical trials are necessary for the evaluation of the clinical outcomes of this technique.

C1-C2 intraarticular distraction with anterior cervical cages for basilar invagination realignment: Operative technique nuances and review of literature

Neurosurgical management of basilar invagination (BI) has traditionally been aimed at direct cervicomedullary decompression through transoral dens resection or suboccipital decompression with supplemental instrumented fixation. Dr. Goel introduced chronic atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) as the etiology in most cases of BI and described a technique for distracting the C1-C2 joint with interfacet spacers to achieve reduction and anatomic realignment. We present our modification to Goel's surgical technique, in which we utilize anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) cages as C1-C2 interfacet implants. A young adult male presented to our institution with BI, cervicomedullary compression, occipitalization of C1, and Chiari 1 malformation. There was AAD of C1 over the C2 lateral masses. This reduced some with preoperative traction. He underwent successful C1-C2 interfacet joint reduction and arthrodesis with anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) cages and concomittant occiput to C2 instrumented fusion. BI can be effectively treated through reduction of AAD and by utilizing ACD cages as interfacet spacers.

Pediatric spinal instrumentation

This article reviews the evolution of spinal instrumentation in the pediatric age group, starting with the cervical spine and atlantoaxial area and ending with the lower spine. The congenital and the acquired conditions which require instrumentation are described. The technical details regarding pediatric instrumentation are alluded to, and finally an attempt is made to predict the future of spinal instrumentation in this age group.

Posterior Reduction and Intra-Articular Cage Fusion With a C2 Nerve Root Preservation Technique for Treating Posterior Atlantoaxial Dislocation Secondary to Os Odontoideum

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Posterior C1-C2 interlaminae compression fusion with iliac bone graft may lead to donor site complications and recurrent C1 posterior dislocation for posterior atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) secondary to os odontoideum. C1-C2 intra-articular fusion often needs C2 nerve ganglion transection to facilitate exposing and manipulating the facet joint, leading to bleeding from the venous plexus and suboccipital numbness or pain. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of posterior C1-C2 intra-articular fusion with a C2 nerve root preservation technique in the treatment of posterior AAD secondary to os odontoideum.

METHODS

Data of the 11 patients who underwent C1-C2 posterior intra-articular fusion because of posterior AAD secondary to os odontoideum were retrospectively reviewed. Posterior reduction was performed using C1 transarch lateral mass screws and C2 pedicle screws. Intra-articular fusion was performed using a polyetheretherketone cage filled with autologous bone from the caudal edge of the C1 posterior arch and cranial edge of the C2 laminar. Outcomes were evaluated by using the Japanese Orthopaedics Association score, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale for neck pain. Bone fusion was evaluated by using computed tomography and 3-dimensional reconstruction.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 43.9 ± 9.5 months. All patients achieved good reduction and bone fusion, without transection of the C2 nerve roots. The mean bone fusion time was 4.3 ± 1.1 months. There was no complication related to the surgical approach and instrumentation. Function of the spinal cord manifested by the Japanese Orthopaedics Association score significantly improved ( P < .05). The Neck Disability Index score and visual analog scale for neck pain markedly decreased (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Posterior reduction and intra-articular cage fusion with a C2 nerve root preservation technique was a promising treatment of posterior AAD secondary to os odontoideum.

Modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass for basilar invagination

PURPOSE

In economically undeveloped areas, surgery for basilar invagination (BI) is still a serious economic burden for people. This study introduces a modified interfacet technique for the treatment of BI using shaped autologous occipital bone mass to reduce BI and to save economical expenditure.

METHODS

The data of 6 patients with BI who underwent modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass in our hospital from April 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. During the operation, osteotomy at the external occipital protuberance was performed using ultrasonic osteotome, followed by interfacet release and implantation of shaped autologous occipital bone mass to complete vertical reduction. The atlantodental interval (ADI), Chamberlain's line violation (CLV), clivo-axial angle (CXA) and cervico-medullary angle (CMA) were compared before and after surgery. Additionally, we observed implant stability during the follow-up period to assess the long-term success of the modified interfacet technique.

RESULTS

The surgical procedure was successful in all six patients, with no reported incidents of vascular injury, spinal cord injury, or dural tear. Following the operation, improvements were observed in the ADI, CLV, CXA, and CMA. Throughout the follow-up period, the implants remained stable, demonstrating no complications such as bone resorption of the autologous occipital bone mass, implant fracture, or displacement.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of shaped autologous occipital bone mass in atlantoaxial interfacet bone grafting has demonstrated effectiveness and feasibility. This technique offers simplicity, ease of preparation, and cost-effectiveness, making it a viable option for treating BI.

Comparison of Atlantoaxial Intra-Articular Fusion and Posterior Structural Bone Grafting Techniques for Treating Atlantoaxial Dislocation

BACKGROUND

The structural bone grafting (SBG) technique provided high fusion rate and satisfied outcomes for treating atlantoaxial dislocation, but it is unclear whether the atlantoaxial intra-articular cage (AIC) technique can provide clinical results comparable with SBG technique.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of 2 bone graft techniques applied in posterior C1-C2 screw-rod fixation and fusion surgery for treating atlantoaxial dislocation.

METHODS

The data from 55 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation were retrospectively reviewed. The SBG technique had been used in 29 patients and the AIC technique in 26 patients. The outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scale score, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale score for neck pain and compared between the 2 groups. The donor site complications were also recorded in SBG group, and donor site pain was assessed using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

In the final follow-up, the bone fusion rate was 100% in both groups. No significant differences were found in the bone fusion time between the 2 groups ( P > .05). Postoperatively, the Japanese Orthopedic Association, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale score for neck pain indexes improved significantly within both SBG (all P < .05) and AIC groups (all P < .05). Nevertheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The SBG and AIC techniques were both effective for achieving atlantoaxial arthrodesis, and the AIC technique is a perfect alternative to the SBG technique when the posterior arch of C1 is incompetent.

Efficacy and Safety of Goel-Harms Technique in Upper Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of implant-associated complications and fusion rates for the Goel-Harms technique (GHT) and to show potential factors affecting the complications and nonunion development.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed database according to PRISMA guidance was performed. The main inclusion criteria comprised description of fusion rate and/or implant-associated complications rate.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 86 articles focused on the results of surgery in 4208 patients. The rate of screw-related complications was as follows: 1) vertebral artery (VA) injury, 2.8%; 2) screw malposition in the direction of the VA, 5.8%; and 3) C2 nerve root irritation, 6.1%. The nonunion rate was 4.2%. Transpedicular screw insertion to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were the safest regarding VA injury and correlated with lower blood loss. For C1-C2 fusion, there was no statistical difference for the different bone graft localization. C2 nerve root irritation rate did not depend on screw insertion technique. The use of a freehand technique did not correlate with a high rate of screw-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The Goel-Harms technique is a promising method of C1-C2 fusion, with a relatively low nonunion and VA injury rate. It can be performed safely without C-arm or navigation system assistance. Transpedicular screw insertion trajectories to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were safest regarding VA injury and blood loss volume. Further comparative studies of various C1-C2 stabilization methods with a high level of significance should be carried out to identify the optimal approach.

Biomechanical analysis of atlantoaxial intraarticular fusion cages with posterior pedicle screws fixation using finite element method

BACKGROUND

Cadaveric biomechanical studies indicated that atlantoaxial intraarticular fusion cages with posterior pedicle screws fixation could increase the multi-axial rigidity. However, the stress distribution of the fixation construct is still unclear.

METHODS

From computed tomography images, a nonlinear intact three-dimensional C0-2 finite element model was developed and validated. Four finite element models were reconstructed: intact model, unstable model, bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws combined bilateral cages model, bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws model. The range of motion and maximum von Mises stresses were compared under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

FINDINGS

Compared with unstable model, both bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws combined bilateral cages model and bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws model fixation techniques reduced range of motion by >99% in extension, flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation. For bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws combined bilateral cages model, the maximum von Mises stress was in the base of the C2 screw head site. In the bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws model was stressed at the rod linked C1 and C2 screws. Compared with bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws model, bilateral atlantoaxial pedicle screws combined bilateral cages model reduced the maximum von Mises stress on the implants by >90% in extension, flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation.

INTERPRETATION

The finite element model study indicated that, compared with posterior C1-C2 pedicle screws fixation, atlantoaxial intraarticular fusion cages with posterior pedicle screws fixation could not only significantly restore stability to the atlantoaxial junction, but also dramatically reduce the maximum von Mises stress in the C1-C2 pedicle screws.

Temporary posterior C1-2 instrumentation without fusion for treatment of displaced atlantoaxial fractures

OBJECTIVE

We describe open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with posterior C1-2 instrumentation without fusion to treat displaced atlantoaxial fractures with later instrumentation removal. Potential benefits are improved fracture healing while maintaining C1-2 mobility and avoiding complications of halo vest immobilization (HVI).

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 14 patients (mean age 44 years) with displaced atlantoaxial fractures treated with ORIF without fusion. Patient demographics, fracture morphology, trauma etiology, instrumentation levels, timing of hardware removal, and complications were collected. Patients were maintained in a cervical collar, and healing was confirmed via imaging prior to instrumentation removal.

RESULTS

Fractures included Type III odontoid, C2 pars, C1 ring, and complex C1 or C2 fractures. All cases utilized C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pars or pedicle screws with a C1 crosslink. Two patients had C3 lateral mass screws. All patients showed fracture healing on imaging within 4 months after ORIF. Thirteen patients underwent instrumentation removal. No complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

Displaced atlantoaxial fractures have been traditionally managed with HVI closed reduction or ORIF with fusion. We described a technique of ORIF without fusion and subsequent hardware removal as an alternative. This strategy preserves mobility at C1-2 and avoids HVI, and appears to be a safe option for the treatment of atlantoaxial fractures.

The Results of Interfacetal Fusion Using Local Bone Combined With an Atlantoaxial Instrumentation

BACKGROUND

Many studies have described different C1-2 fusion techniques that have evolved over time. We introduced an easy and effective C1-2 fusion technique using local bone chips combined with atlantoaxial instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the efficacy of interfacetal fusion using local bone combined with atlantoaxial instrumentation by assessment of clinical outcomes and fusion rate.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data from 25 patients who underwent atlantoaxial stabilization surgery using C1-2 pedicle screws and interfacetal bone fusion by a single surgeon between March 2012 and December 2019.

RESULTS

The demographics were 15 men and 10 women with a mean age of 57.6 years (range, 27-85 years) at the time of surgery. Three patients underwent surgery for myelopathy due to os odontoideum, 9 for C1-2 instability, 9 for trauma, 3 for rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 for bony spur, C1-2. At 3 months postsurgery, 3 and 21 patients showed 2-point and 1-point improvements in the Nurick grade, respectively. There was no difference in the Nurick score in 1 patient. Seven patients had a computed tomography scan at 1 year after surgery, which revealed a bridging trabecular bone. No movement was observed in the x-ray flexion/extension view at 1 year after surgery in all patients. In addition, no patients complained of postoperative occipital neuralgia.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that interfacetal fusion with C1-2 pedicle screws using the free-hand technique was efficient and simple.

Safety and Feasibility of DTRAX Cervical Cages in the Atlantoaxial Joint for C1/2 Stabilization

BACKGROUND

Pathological changes in the atlantoaxial joint often lead to instability, pain, and neurological deterioration. One treatment option is the surgical stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint. In other areas of the spine, fusion rates have been improved by the introduction of an interbody cage. Our aim was to use cervical interbody spacers, originally designed to augment fusion across subaxial posterior cervical facets, to optimize the conditions for atlantoaxial fusion.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of implanting cervical cages in the atlantoaxial joint for C1/2 stabilization.

METHODS

Our retrospective study evaluated patients who had undergone C1/2 cervical fusions by the Harms/Goel technique. This technique was modified by implanting a titanium cervical interbody spacer into the joint space. Mean overall pain, as measured by a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) and neurological outcomes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, radiological outcomes were collected using follow-up imaging.

RESULTS

Nine patients were included in this case series. The mean preoperative VAS for overall pain was 5.0 ± 4.0, which changed to a mean VAS of 2.0 ± 3.0 after an average follow-up period of 41.4 ± 20.4 (P = .043). All patients showed a bony fusion in our case series. None of the radiological imaging during follow-up showed screw loosening, hardware breakage, implant migration, or nonunion.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of cervical titanium cages into the atlantoaxial joint in combination with posterior fixation appears to be a safe and effective method for achieving C1/2 fusion.

Clinical application of the C2 pars screw technique in the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

BACKGROUND

Our research was designed to decide whether the application of C2 pars screws is an alternative choice for patients with OPLL involving the C2 segment.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients who underwent cervical laminectomy with fusion (LF) from C2 to C6 for OPLL were reviewed. Among them, C2 pedicle screws were placed in 23 patients, who were the pedicle group, and C2 pars screws were placed in 17 patients, who were the pars group. The screw placement and vertebral artery (VA) anatomy presented by standard CT. General clinical characteristics and health-related outcomes were evaluated and compared preoperatively and during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The Pars group tended to have a shorter operation duration and less blood loss than the pedicle group (operation time: 115.29 ± 28.75 vs 133.48 ± 26.22, p = 0.044; blood loss: 383.53 ± 116.19 vs 457.83 ± 145.45, p = 0.039). Operation time and blood loss were both independently related to the pars group (operation time: OR = 0.966, p = 0.021; blood loss: OR = 0.993, p = 0.046). The idealization and acceptability of C2 screws in the pars group exceeded those in the pedicle group (100% vs 91.3%). However, no statistically obvious variation in the included complications or health-related outcomes between the pedicle and pars groups was observed.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of patients with OPLL involving the C2 segment, the application of C2 pars screws is an alternative choice, which is not only safer but also reduces the amount of blood loss, shortens the operation time and obtains a more ideal screw placement.

An experience with Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation for type II odontoid fractures

Objective:

Type II odontoid fractures need surgical stabilization for disabling neck pain and instability. Anterior odontoid screw fixation is a well-known technique. However, certain patients require posterior fixation. We present our surgical results and experiences with nine cases managed by the Goel-Harms technique.

Materials and Methods:

This is a retrospective review of nine patients operated on between January 2019 and December 2021 for Type II odontoid fractures with posterior fixation technique. Their clinical profile was collected from case files. The radiological data were retrieved from radiology archives. The indications for surgery were instability and refractory neck pain. The surgical decision for posterior fixation was guided by fracture morphology.

Results:

The mean age of presentation was 37.22 ± 9.85 years. Seven patients had Type II, and two had Type IIa odontoid fracture. All patients presented with unbearable neck pain. One patient had a quadriparesis. The fracture line was anterior-inferior sloping in six, posterior-inferior sloping in two, and transverse in one case. The anterior-posterior displacement of fracture ranged from 0 to 7 mm (mean 2.44 ± 2.18 mm). Partial transverse ligament tear without the Atlanto Axial Dislocation was present in three patients. The C1-C2 joint distraction was required in five cases. C1-C2 joint spacer was required in two cases. Following surgery, neck pain was relieved in all cases. Complete fracture alignment was achieved in eight patients. There were no postoperative complications. At the mean follow-up of 16.22 ± 9.61 months, there was no implant failure.

Conclusions:

Posterior C1-C2 fixation by the Goel-Harms technique is an excellent alternative to anterior fixation in selected cases.

Extended tulip cervical reduction screws to restore alignment in traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation after type 3 odontoid fracture: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Traumatic atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation after type 3 odontoid fracture is an uncommon presentation that may require complex intraoperative reduction maneuvers and presents challenges to successful instrumentation and fusion.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors report a case of a 39-year-old female patient who sustained a type 3 odontoid fracture. She was neurologically intact and managed in a rigid collar. Four months later, she presented again after a second trauma with acute torticollis and type 2 atlantoaxial subluxation, again neurologically intact. Serial cervical traction was placed with minimal radiographic reduction. Ultimately, she underwent intraoperative reduction, instrumentation, and fusion. Freehand C1 lateral mass reduction screws were placed, then C2 translaminar screws, and finally lateral mass screws at C3 and C4. The C2–4 instrumentation was used as bilateral rod anchors to reduce the C1 lateral mass reduction screws engaged onto the subluxated atlantodental complex. As a final step, cortical allograft spacers were inserted at C1–2 under compression to facilitate long-term stability and fusion.

LESSONS

This is the first description of a technique using extended tulip cervical reduction screws to correct traction-irreducible atlantoaxial subluxation. This case is a demonstration of using intraoperative tools available for the spine surgeon managing complex cervical injuries requiring intraoperative reduction that is resistant to traction reduction.

C2 Nerve Root Preservation During Posterior Fixation for Instability Secondary to Congenital Craniovertebral Junction Anomalies: Feasibility Factors and Related Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Patients with instability because of congenital craniovertebral anomalies often have complex C1-C2 osseovascular anomalies. C2 nerve root sacrifice has been described to address such difficult anatomy during posterior C1-C2 fixation and has its own downsides. Its preservation as a recent alternative poses greater surgical challenge, and the considerations differ from other causes of craniovertebral junctional instability; the pertaining outcomes have been scarcely studied. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine the feasibility and outcomes related to C2 nerve root preservation in patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) after posterior C1-C2 fixation.

METHODS

In this observational study, 63 patients (126 nerve roots) with CAAD after posterior fixation were prospectively assessed. Underlying osseovascular anomalies affecting the feasibility of C2 nerve root preservation, and C2 nerve-related dysfunction at 12 months follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall C2 nerve root preservation rate was 89.7%. Even in the presence of extreme joint obliquity/spondyloptosis and anomalous vertebral artery, it was feasible in about three fourths. After preservation, 28.3% patients developed new-onset C2 nerve root dysfunction: neuralgia in 2, dysesthesia in 6, and hypoesthesia/paresthesia in 9. The symptoms were not disabling in most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In most patients with CAAD, C2 nerve root preservation is feasible despite an aberrant bony and vascular anatomy. A few patients after nerve root preservation develop related symptoms that are conservatively manageable, with no significant adverse consequences. Given the controversy in the literature on C2 nerve sacrifice-related outcomes, we favor an attempt at C2 nerve root preservation.

Feasibility and Safety of Goel-Harms Posterior C1-C2 Fusion in the Management of Pediatric Reducible Atlantoaxial Instability

BACKGROUND

Pediatric atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is not common and could be a serious clinical condition. The Goel-Harms technique is one of the most used techniques in adults and needs more evaluation in pediatric populations. This study reports the feasibility and safety of the Goel-Harms technique in the treatment of pediatric reducible AAI.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study we reported all pediatric patients who underwent Goel-Harms technique for AAI with a minimum 1-year follow up. Patients were clinically assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and radiologically with plain radiographs, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging of the craniocervical region. Postoperatively, patients were followed up according to our clinical and radiographic imaging protocol. The following parameters were recorded: JOA score, construct stability, fusion, and abnormal events.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients have completed a 1-year follow-up and fulfilled our criteria. The mean age was 10.68 ± 4.47 (range, 3-17) years. Fifteen patients were male and 10 were female. The final diagnosis included Down syndrome (DS) in 8, type II dens fracture in 7, os odontoideum in 3, and atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in 7. The mean follow-up was 21.76 ± 8.22 months. The preoperative JOA score improved from 15.96 ± 1.46 to 16.76 ± 1.92 at the last follow-up. Sound bone fusion was reported in 92% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the Goel-Harms technique is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure in managing pediatric reducible AAI. Special perioperative care should be offered to young AAI patients with DS.

Surgical nuances and construct patterns influence construct stiffness in C1-2 stabilizations: a biomechanical study of C1-2 gapping and advanced C1-2 fixation

PURPOSE

Stabilization of C1-2 using a Harms-Goel construct with 3.5 mm titanium (Ti) rods has been established as a standard of reference (SOR). A reduction in craniocervical deformities can indicate increased construct stiffness at C1-2. A reduction in C1-2 can result in C1-2 joint gapping. Therefore, the authors sought to study the biomechanical consequences of C1-2 gapping on construct stiffness using different instrumentations, including a novel 6-screw/3-rod (6S3R) construct, to compare the results to the SOR. We hypothesized that different instrument pattern will reveal significant differences in reduction in ROM among constructs tested.

METHODS

The range of motion (ROM) of instrumented C1-2 polyamide models was analyzed in a six-degree-of-freedom spine tester. The models were loaded with pure moments (2.0 Nm) in axial rotation (AR), flexion extension (FE), and lateral bending (LB). Comparisons of C1-2 construct stiffness among the constructs included variations in rod diameter (3.5 mm vs. 4.0 mm), rod material (Ti. vs. CoCr) and a cross-link (CLX). Construct stiffness was tested with C1-2 facets in contact (Contact Group) and in a 2 mm distracted position (Gapping Group). The ROM (°) was recorded and reported as a percentage of ROM (%ROM) normalized to the SOR. A difference > 30% between the SOR and the %ROM among the constructs was defined as significant.

RESULTS

Among all constructs, an increase in construct stiffness up to 50% was achieved with the addition of CLX, particularly with a 6S3R construct. These differences showed the greatest effect for the CLX in AR testing and for the 6S3R construct in FE and AR testing. Among all constructs, C1-2 gapping resulted in a significant loss of construct stiffness. A protective effect was shown for the CLX, particularly using a 6S3R construct in AR and FE testing. The selection of rod diameter (3.5 mm vs. 4.0 mm) and rod material (Ti vs. CoCr) did show a constant trend but did not yield significance.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to show the loss of construct stiffness at C1-2 with gapping and increased restoration of stability using CLX and 6S3R constructs. In the correction of a craniocervical deformity, nuances in the surgical technique and advanced instrumentation may positively impact construct stability.

Refractory Syncope and Presyncope Associated with Atlantoaxial Instability: Preliminary Evidence of Improvement Following Surgical Stabilization

BACKGROUND

The proclivity to atlantoaxial instability (AAI) has been widely reported for conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and Down syndrome. Similarly, we have found a higher than expected incidence of AAI in hereditary connective tissue disorders. We demonstrate a strong association of AAI with manifestations of dysautonomia, in particular syncope and lightheadedness, and make preliminary observations as to the salutary effect of surgical stabilization of the atlantoaxial motion segment.

METHODS

In an institutional review board-approved retrospective study, 20 subjects (16 women, 4 men) with hereditary connective tissue disorders had AAI diagnosed by computed tomography. Subjects underwent realignment (reduction), stabilization, and fusion of the C1-C2 motion segment. All subjects completed preoperative and postoperative questionnaires in which they were asked about performance, function, and autonomic symptoms, including lightheadedness, presyncope, and syncope.

RESULTS

All patients with AAI reported lightheadedness, and 15 had refractory syncope or presyncope despite maximal medical management and physical therapy. Postoperatively, subjects reported a statistically significant improvement in lightheadedness (P = 0.003), presyncope (P = 0.006), and syncope (P = 0.03), and in the frequency (P < 0.05) of other symptoms related to autonomic function, such as nausea, exercise intolerance, palpitations, tremors, heat intolerance, gastroesophageal reflux, and sleep apnea.

CONCLUSIONS

This study draws attention to the potential for AAI to present with syncope or presyncope that is refractory to medical management, and for surgical stabilization of AAI to lead to improvement of these and other autonomic symptoms.

Posterolateral epidural supra-C2-root approach (PESCA) for biopsy of lesions of the odontoid process in same sitting after occipitocervical fixation and decompression-perioperative management and how to avoid vertebral artery injury

This study aims to describe the posterolateral epidural supra-C2-root approach (PESCA), which might be a good alternative to the transoral, anterolateral, and other posterolateral approaches for biopsy of lesions of the odontoid process (OP). The preoperative planning of PESCA included computerized tomography (CT), CT-angiography, and three-dimensional reconstruction (if possible, even with three-dimensional print) to analyze the angle of the trajectory and the anatomy of the vertebral artery (VA). For PESCA, the patient is positioned under general anesthesia in prone position. In case of an osteolytic lesion with fracture of the OP, an X-ray is performed after positioning to verify anatomic alignment. In the first step, in case of instability and compression of the spinal cord, a craniocervical fusion and decompression is performed (laminectomy of the middle part of the C1 arc and removal of the lower part of the lateral C1 arc). The trajectory is immediately above the C2 root (and under the upper rest of the lateral part of C1 arc). Even if the trajectory is narrowed, it is possible to perform PESCA without relevant traction of the spinal cord. The vertical segment of V3 of the VA at the level of C2 is protected by the vertebral foramen, and the horizontal part of V3 is protected by the remnant upper lateral part of the C1 arc (in case of normal variants). PESCA might be a good choice for biopsy of selected lesions of the OP in same sitting procedure after craniocervical stabilization and decompression.

Muscle Sparing C1-C2 Laminoplasty: Cadaveric Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Posterior cervical approaches for atlantoaxial and craniovertebral junction pathologies with or without instrumentation are often associated with excessive soft tissue dissection and bleeding consequent with disruption of the venous plexus. A few minimally invasive approaches to this region have been reported from clinical and cadaveric studies in an effort to minimize blood loss, reduce soft tissue dissection, and decrease postoperative pain; however, unilateral minimally invasive approaches have not been described. Here, we describe a minimally invasive atlantoaxial and craniovertebral approach.

METHODS

Using fresh cadavers, we performed a novel, right-sided, muscle-sparing minimally invasive C1-C2 laminotomy with laminoplasty for access to the atlantoaxial level and craniovertebral junction and used the traditional approach on left sides.

RESULTS

Using this approach, the atlantoaxial space and craniovertebral junction with wide and generous exposure via unilateral soft tissue dissection and muscle splitting was achieved. After exposure, the musculoosseous unit was easily repositioned, thus allowing for C1-C2 laminoplasty. Grossly, no damage to the vertebral artery or regional nerves was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a novel, unilateral minimally invasive approach to reach the atlantoaxial and craniovertebral junction. This could allow for faster postoperative recovery, less pain and opioid requirement, and increased maintenance of atlantoaxial stability. Such a technique, after being confirmed in patients, could optimize this surgical technique.

A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Bicentric Study, and Literature Review to Assess the Need of C2-Ganglion Preservation - SAVIOUR's Criteria

Objective

Joint manipulation for craniovertebral junction instability is often hindered by the C2-ganglion (C2G). Our study aims to compare the surgical outcome among patients with or without C2G preservation and discuss the technical nuances.

Methods

We did a prospective, bicentric study and included all the operated patients with craniovertebral junction anomaly. The outcome was assessed by the Pain Numeric Rating Scale, Patient Satisfactions Score, and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. The fusion was assessed using Lenke fusion grade.

Results

One hundred seventy-one patients (88 in group A and 83 in group B) were included. The most common symptom was spastic quadriparesis (n = 165, 96.5%) with median Nurick grade 3.3. Thirteen patients had suboccipital numbness and 12 patients had paraesthesia. Mean blood loss in group A was 490 ± 96.2 mL and group B was 525 ± 45.7 mL; median operative time was 217.9 and 162.2 minutes in the groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.05). At the follow-up (median, 46.8 months), Lenke fusion grade A was achieved in 92.4% and grade B in 7.6%. A trend suggesting better functional outcomes (numbness, parestheisa, scar outcome, and postoperative ulcer formation) in group A was seen with all 6 patients, who underwent O-C2 fixation, developed pressure sore.

Conclusion

Our results support ganglion preservation, especially in the subset of patients where occipital plating is required. Although the study fails to show any statistical significance, we suggest that one should always start with an ‘intent’ of preservation as the functional outcome is better.

Anterior Distraction and Reduction with Posterior Stabilization for Basilar Invagination: A Novel Technique

BACKGROUND

Introduction of a posterior spacer for atlantoaxial joint distraction followed by posterior stabilization is a commonly performed procedure for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. We present a unique case in which posterior distraction was associated with increased risk of injury to the vertebral artery (VA) owing to its anomalous course, and hence a novel anterior distraction technique was used.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 45-year-old woman presented with severe neck pain for 1 month with gait imbalance and history of occipital headache for 1 year. Clinical examination revealed upper motor neuron-type findings. Hoffmann sign was positive bilaterally. Clinically, the patient had Nurick grade 4 cervical myelopathy. Magnetic resonance imaging showed basilar invagination along with Arnold-Chiari malformation and syrinx formation at C3-C4 vertebral levels. CT angiography revealed anomalous VAs directly overlying the atlanto-occipital joint. Owing to the anomalous route of the VA and unfavorable slope of facet joints, a 2-step anterior reduction followed by posterior stabilization surgery was planned. We achieved complete reduction using a 10-mm titanium cage inserted via a retropharyngeal approach. Following anterior reduction, instrumented in situ occipitocervical fusion was performed using a plate and screw construct. At 2-year follow-up, the patient is ambulating independently without gait imbalance and with successful radiologic fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The craniovertebral junction has a unique pathoanatomy, and the course of the vertebral artery is variable. Appropriate investigations, including computed tomography angiography, with adequate surgical planning will provide a desirable long-term outcome. Our novel technique has the potential to add a new dimension to the management of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

Atlanto-axial rotary instability (Fielding type 1): characteristic clinical and radiological findings, and treatment outcomes following alignment, fusion, and stabilization

Atlanto-axial instability (AAI) is common in the connective tissue disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, and increasingly recognized in the heritable disorders of Stickler, Loeys-Dietz, Marfan, Morquio, and Ehlers-Danlos (EDS) syndromes, where it typically presents as a rotary subluxation due to incompetence of the alar ligament. This retrospective, IRB-approved study examines 20 subjects with Fielding type 1 rotary subluxation, characterized by anterior subluxation of the facet on one side, with a normal atlanto-dental interval. Subjects diagnosed with a heritable connective tissue disorder, and AAI had failed non-operative treatment and presented with severe headache, neck pain, and characteristic neurological findings. Subjects underwent a modified Goel-Harms posterior C1-C2 screw fixation and fusion without complication. At 15 months, two subjects underwent reoperation following a fall (one) and occipito-atlantal instability (one). Patients reported improvement in the frequency or severity of neck pain (P < 0.001), numbness in the hands and lower extremities (P = 0.001), headaches, pre-syncope, and lightheadedness (all P < 0.01), vertigo and arm weakness (both P = 0.01), and syncope, nausea, joint pain, and exercise tolerance (all P < 0.05). The diagnosis of Fielding type 1 AAI requires directed investigation with dynamic imaging. Alignment and stabilization is associated with improvement of pain, syncopal and near-syncopal episodes, sensorimotor function, and exercise tolerance.

Impact of Chronic DMARD Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Undergoing Surgery of the Craniovertebral Junction: A Multi-center Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

A multi-centered retrospective review from five institutions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether continuing or withholding disease-modifying antirheumatoid drugs (DMARDs) in the perioperative period affect outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing arthrodesis at the craniovertebral junction SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: RA is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease that affects the cervical spine and is treated with DMARDs. Some advocate withholding DMARDs in the perioperative period due to concern for the cytotoxic effects of these medications. However, the impact of DMARDs in the perioperative period is not well understood.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study from five affiliated institutions was performed. Adult patients with RA on chronic DMARDs undergoing posterior arthrodesis of the craniovertebral junction (occipital-cervical or atlanto-axial arthrodesis) were identified. Patients were stratified based on whether DMARD therapy was continued (C group) or discontinued (DC group) in the perioperative period. The primary outcome was the need for reoperation and reason for reoperation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, 19 in C group and 20 in DC group. Average follow-up time was 42 months. Four patients (three in DC group and one in C group) required reoperation. Two patients from the DC group required readmission secondary to RA flare-up.

CONCLUSION

Our cohort of RA patients who underwent occipital-cervical and C1/C2 posterior arthrodesis showed no significant differences in surgical complications when DMARD therapy was continued or discontinued in the perioperative period. The decision to continue or discontinue DMARD therapy in the perioperative period is at the discretion of the treating physician, but we encourage physicians to counsel patients regarding this theoretical risk and their tolerance of the medications as well as the risk of RA flare-up. Factors such as overall health, disease burden, nutrition, bone quality, smoking status, and other comorbid conditions are likely to have a larger influence on perioperative complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Freehand Placement of the C1 Pedicle Screw Using Direct Visualization of the Pedicle Anatomy and Serial Dilatation

Objective

We designed a method for inserting C1 pedicle screws using the direct visualization technique of the pedicle and serial dilatation technique to reduce complications and malposition of screw, and assessed the accuracy of this method.

Methods

Free-hand C1 pedicle screw insertion using the direct visualization technique of the pedicle and serial dilatation technique was performed on 5 consecutive patients with C1–2 instability at a single institute from March to December 2018. The method involved protecting the vertebral artery (VA) and C1 root using the Penfield No. 1, securing the entry point of the posterior arch screw and the pedicle was visible directly in Trendelenburg position. The hole at the entry point of the C1 posterior arch was serially dilated using a 2.5×3.0 mm drill bit, and the C1 pedicle screw was inserted with the free hand technique. We measured postoperative radiological parameters and recorded intraoperative complications, postoperative neurological deficits and the occurrence of occipital neuralgia. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) was performed to check screw malposition or construction failure.

Results

Of the 10 C1 pedicle screws on postoperative CT, 20% of screws (grade A) were in the ideal position while 80% of screws (grade B) occupied a safe position. Overall, 100% of screws were safe (grade A or B). There were no iatrogenic neurological deficits, VA injury.

Conclusion

Freehand placement of the C1 pedicle screw through the direct visualization technique of the pedicle and serial dilatation technique is safe and effective without intraoperative fluoroscopy guidance.

Comparison of the Accuracy of C1 Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Fluoroscopy and Free-Hand Techniques in Patients With Posterior Arch Thickness of Less Than 4 mm

BACKGROUND

C1 pedicle screw insertion is not easy, and more fluoroscopy can be required for safe insertion. Fluoroscopy is time consuming and increases patient radiation exposure. There have been no studies comparing the accuracy of C1 pedicle screw insertion using the fluoroscopy and free-hand techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a free-hand C1 pedicle screw insertion method in patients with the posterior arch thickness of less than 4 mm in the thinnest part of the groove, and to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of C1 pedicle screw insertion using fluoroscopy vs using the free-hand technique.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients who had atlantoaxial instability with a C1 posterior arch &lt;4 mm and were treated with C1 pedicle screw insertion were included. In 10 patients, fluoroscopy was used for C1 pedicle screw insertion, and 15 patients underwent the free-hand technique. We compared the radiologic and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In patients who underwent the free-hand technique, 96.5% of screws were rated as safe (grade A or B), and 80.0% of screws in the fluoroscopy group were rated as safe. Postoperative occipital neuralgia occurred in one patient in the fluoroscopy group and did not occur in the free-hand technique group. There was no significant difference in the improvement of Nurick grade between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

C1 pedicle screw insertion using the free-hand technique is feasible and safe in patients with a C1 posterior arch &lt;4 mm.

Atlantoaxial dislocation due to os odontoideum in patients with Down's syndrome: literature review and case reports

PURPOSE

To clarify etiology, clinical features, and diagnostic and treatment options of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) due to os odontoideum (OsO) in patients with Down's syndrome (DS).

METHODS

We described and analyzed three clinical cases of AAD due to OsO in DS patients and reviewed descriptions of similar cases in the scientific sources.

RESULTS

According to literature review, more than 80% of DS patients with odontoid ossicles had atlantoaxial instability (AAI). AAI in DS patients with OsO is more often manifested in childhood and adolescence, rarely in adults when ligament relaxation is reduced. Some patients had acute clinical manifestation after a minor trauma without any precursors; in some of the cases, neurological deterioration increased during several years. We found that the earlier surgical treatment of AAD due to OsO in DS patients carries the higher recovery potential.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with DS and OsO had AAI. The method of appropriate treatment in such cases is a posterior screw fixation. Preoperative halo traction and posterior fusion have proved to be a very useful tool in the treatment of AAD due to OsO in DS patients. Even if irreducibility of the AAD established preoperatively, it should not be an absolute indication for anterior decompression. In such cases, an attempt to reduce the AAD should be made under general anesthesia during posterior fixation.

Cervical medullary syndrome secondary to craniocervical instability and ventral brainstem compression in hereditary hypermobility connective tissue disorders: 5-year follow-up after craniocervical reduction, fusion, and stabilization

A great deal of literature has drawn attention to the "complex Chiari," wherein the presence of instability or ventral brainstem compression prompts consideration for addressing both concerns at the time of surgery. This report addresses the clinical and radiological features and surgical outcomes in a consecutive series of subjects with hereditary connective tissue disorders (HCTD) and Chiari malformation. In 2011 and 2012, 22 consecutive patients with cervical medullary syndrome and geneticist-confirmed hereditary connective tissue disorder (HCTD), with Chiari malformation (type 1 or 0) and kyphotic clivo-axial angle (CXA) enrolled in the IRB-approved study (IRB# 10-036-06: GBMC). Two subjects were excluded on the basis of previous cranio-spinal fusion or unrelated medical issues. Symptoms, patient satisfaction, and work status were assessed by a third-party questionnaire, pain by visual analog scale (0-10/10), neurologic exams by neurosurgeon, function by Karnofsky performance scale (KPS). Pre- and post-operative radiological measurements of clivo-axial angle (CXA), the Grabb-Mapstone-Oakes measurement, and Harris measurements were made independently by neuroradiologist, with pre- and post-operative imaging (MRI and CT), 10/20 with weight-bearing, flexion, and extension MRI. All subjects underwent open reduction, stabilization occiput to C2, and fusion with rib autograft. There was 100% follow-up (20/20) at 2 and 5 years. Patients were satisfied with the surgery and would do it again given the same circumstances (100%). Statistically significant improvement was seen with headache (8.2/10 pre-op to 4.5/10 post-op, p < 0.001, vertigo (92%), imbalance (82%), dysarthria (80%), dizziness (70%), memory problems (69%), walking problems (69%), function (KPS) (p < 0.001). Neurological deficits improved in all subjects. The CXA average improved from 127° to 148° (p < 0.001). The Grabb-Oakes and Harris measurements returned to normal. Fusion occurred in 100%. There were no significant differences between the 2- and 5-year period. Two patients returned to surgery for a superficial wound infections, and two required transfusion. All patients who had rib harvests had pain related that procedure (3/10), which abated by 5 years. The results support the literature, that open reduction of the kyphotic CXA to lessen ventral brainstem deformity, and fusion/stabilization to restore stability in patients with HCTD is feasible, associated with a low surgical morbidity, and results in enduring improvement in pain and function. Rib harvest resulted in pain for several years in almost all subjects.

Accuracy evaluation of placements of three different alternative C2 screws using the freehand technique in patients with high riding vertebral artery

An observational study.To evaluate the safeties of placing three different alternative C2 screws using the freehand technique under high riding vertebral artery (HRVA) and to analyze the C2 morphometry in patients with HRVA.A retrospective analysis of radiologic data was performed on patients that underwent C2 instrumentation from September 2004 to December 2017. Two hundred fifty-one patients were included, and 90 of these patients (35.9%) had a unilateral or bilateral HRVA. We placed three alternative C2 screws including superior pars, inferior pars, and translaminar screws. Computed tomography was used to assess cortical breeches of screw placement and obtain morphometric measurements of C2 pars and lamina, that is, superior pars height/length, inferior pars length, and laminar thickness/length. We used the modification of the all India Institute of Medical Sciences outcome to define cortical breach.In total, 117 alternative C2 screws were inserted in 90 patients; 7 superior pars screws (6%), 69 inferior pars screws (59.0%), and 41 translaminar (35%) screws. Although cortical breaches occurred during 31 screw placements (26.5%), these were unacceptable in only two cases (1.7%). No symptomatic neurovascular complication was observed after screw placement in any case. Mean height of C2 superior pars was 3.8 ± 1.8 mm and mean thickness of C2 lamina was 5.2 ± 1.1 mm. Mean lengths of superior pars, inferior pars, and lamina were 17.8 ± 3.0 mm, 13.6 ± 2.2 mm, and 26.7 ± 3.3 mm, respectively. Superior pars height and lamina thickness < 3.5 mm that was a minimal diameter of cervical screw were 49.6% and 6.8%, alternative C2 screw was not available in these cases.Placements of alternative C2 screws using the freehand technique were achieved accurately and safely in patients with HRVA. However, preoperative morphometric evaluation is essential to determine the best option for C2 instrumentation and C2 screw length to avoid neurovascular complications.

ANATOMICAL EVALUATION OF THE PEDICLE OF THE AXIS THROUGH COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN ADULTS

ABSTRACT Objectives: The topography of the high cervical spine involves several traumatic, degenerative, and rheumatologic pathologies. With the evolution of surgical techniques and synthesis materials available for use in such region, an optimization of the anatomical understanding of this area is required. Methods: Therefore, this study evaluated 62 computed tomographies of the high cervical spine in an adult population, aiming at the study of the anatomical parameters of the axis pedicle. The measures analyzed in this observational study were pedicle length at axial section, pedicle length at sagittal section, pedicle thickness at axial section and interpedicular angulation. Results: Computed tomography is a necessary exam for the programming of C2 pedicle screws and is useful for determining the anatomical changes and evaluating the length of the screws that will be used. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was observed in the length, angulation, and diameter of the pedicles of the axis in relation to sex or age. Conclusion: Regarding sex and age, no statistically significant difference on length, angulation, and pedicle diameter occur. There is an urgent need for computed tomography for surgical planning. Level of Evidence II; Transversal Diagnostic Studies – Investigation of a Diagnosis Test.

Accuracy and Safety in Screw Placement in the High Cervical Spine: Retrospective Analysis of O-arm-based Navigation-assisted C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screws

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of present study was to evaluate accuracy, efficiency, and safety of intraoperative O-arm-based navigation system for the placement of C1 lateral mass screw (C1LMS) and C2 pedicle screws (C2PSs) in high cervical spine operations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

High screw misplacement rates, various pedicle morphometry and vertebral body size variations have led to a search of image-guided systems to improve the surgical accuracy of screw insertion in high cervical spine. The use of O-arm has been proposed for more accurate and efficient spinal instrumentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2009 and August 2016, a total of 48 patients with atlantoaxial instability were surgically treated using the image-guidance system. To reconstruct atlantoaxial instability, we have been using Harm's technique of C1LMS and C2PS fixations. A frameless, stereotactic O-arm-based image-guidance system was used for correct screw placement. Postoperative computed tomographic scan with multiplanar reconstructions were used to determine the accuracy of the screw placement.

RESULTS

A total of 182 screws, including 90 C1LMS and 92 C2PSs were inserted using image-guidance system. In total, 4.4% (4/90) of C1LMS and 7.6% (10/92) of C2PS had cortex violation over 2 mm and considered as "significant." Among the significant cortex violations, "unexpected breech" was 3.3% of all the screws inserted. Two (2.1%) screws inserted had perforated the vertebral artery canal and iatrogenic vertebral artery stenosis was proved with postoperative computed tomography angiography. When divided into time periods, 60% of significant breech occurred during the beginning stage, 40% during adaptation stage and none during expert stage.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the authors demonstrated that use of image-guidance system seems to be beneficial for high cervical instrumentation which requires much experience and steep learning curves. However, incidence of cortex violation does not disappear completely due to the close proximity to spinal canal and surrounding vessels.

How to Transect the C2 Root for C1 Lateral Mass Screw Placement: Case Series and Review of an Underappreciated Variable in Outcome

BACKGROUND

The techniques for atlantoaxial arthrodesis have been modified over the years, and placing C1 lateral mass screws is a modern approach. C2 neuropathy is a complication of concern; however, sacrifice of the C2 nerve is an accepted and often favored adjunct. The impact of the technique for cutting the C2 nerve is not adequately addressed in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes from a series of roots sacrificed during C1-2 fusion with attention to the C2 transection method.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected from trauma patients who underwent C1 screw fixation for atlantoaxial fusion. Chart review was performed and outcome assessed through telephone surveys to patients who were at least 6 months postoperative. Quality of life, C2 nerve function, neck pain, and head pain were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-six roots were divided in 35 patients. There were no cases of occipital neuralgia at routine 3-month follow-up. Delayed telephone surveys were completed in 17 patients and exposed 4 cases of severe head/neck pain but none consistent with occipital neuralgia.

CONCLUSIONS

C2 neuralgia is rare when sharply dividing the C2 root with the aid of bipolar electrocautery at the midportion of the ganglion where it overlies the C1-2 joint. A literature review suggests the impact of the root sacrifice method is an underappreciated modifiable factor in outcome. In future reports, description of the root transection technique is imperative and trials comparing ganglionectomy versus transection proximal to the ganglion or through the ganglion should be considered.

Axis screws: results and complications of a large case series

OBJECTIVE

To present the surgical results of patients who underwent axis screw instrumentation, discussing surgical nuances and complications of the techniques used.

METHODS

Retrospective case-series evaluation of patients who underwent spinal surgery with axis instrumentation using screws.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The most common cause of mechanical instability was spinal cord trauma involving the axis (36 patients - 55.4%), followed by congenital craniocervical malformation (12 patients - 18.5%). Thirty-seven (57%) patients required concomitant C1 fusion. Bilateral axis fixation was performed in almost all cases. Twenty-three patients (35.4%) underwent bilateral laminar screws fixation; pars screws were used in twenty-two patients (33.8%), and pedicular screws were used isolated in only three patients (4.6%). In fourteen patients (21.5%), we performed a hybrid construction. There was no neurological worsening nor vertebral artery injury in this series.

CONCLUSION

Axis screw instrumentation proved to be a safe and efficient method for cervical stabilization. Laminar and pars screws were the most commonly used.

Atlantoaxial fixation using C1 posterior arch screws: feasibility study, morphometric data, and biomechanical analysis

OBJECTIVE

C1–2 is a highly mobile complex that presents unique surgical challenges to achieving biomechanical rigidity and fusion. Posterior wiring methods have been largely replaced with segmental constructs using the C1 lateral mass, C1 pedicle, C2 pars, and C2 pedicle. Modifications to reduce surgical morbidity led to the development of C2 laminar screws. The C1 posterior arch has been utilized mostly as a salvage technique, but recent data indicate that this method provides significant rigidity in flexion-extension and axial rotation. The authors performed biomechanical testing of a C1 posterior arch screw (PAS)/C2 pars screw construct, collected morphometric data from a population of 150 CT scans, and performed a feasibility study of a freehand C1 PAS technique in 45 cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

Cervical spine CT scans from 150 patients were analyzed to determine the average C1 posterior tubercle thickness and size of C1 posterior arches. Eight cadavers were used to compare biomechanical stability of intact specimens, C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw, and C1 PAS/C2 pars screw constructs. Paired comparisons were made using repeated-measures ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests. Forty-five cadaveric specimens were used to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the C1 PAS freehand technique.

RESULTS

Morphometric data showed the average craniocaudal thickness of the C1 posterior tubercle was 12.3 ± 1.94 mm. Eight percent (12/150) of cases showed thin posterior tubercles or midline defects. Average posterior arch thickness was 6.1 ± 1.1 mm and right and left average posterior arch length was 28.7 mm ± 2.53 mm and 28.9 ± 2.29 mm, respectively. Biomechanical testing demonstrated C1 lateral mass/C2 pars and C1 PAS/C2 pars constructs significantly reduced motion in flexion-extension and axial rotation compared with intact specimens (p < 0.05). The C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw construct provided significant rigidity in lateral bending (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two constructs in flexion-extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation. Of the C1 posterior arches, 91.3% were successfully cannulated using a freehand technique with a low incidence of cortical breach (4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This biomechanical analysis indicates equivalent stability of the C1 PAS/C2 pars screw construct compared with a traditional C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw construct. Both provide significant rigidity in flexion-extension and axial rotation. Feasibility testing in 45 cadaveric specimens indicates a high degree of accuracy with low incidence of cortical breach. These findings are supported by a separate radiographic morphometric analysis.

Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at the C1-C2 Lateral Articulation without Posterior Structural Bone Graft in Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion in Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Posterior atlantoaxial fusion is an important armamentarium for neurosurgeons to treat several pathologies involving the craniovertebral junction. Although the potential advantages of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) are well documented in the lumbar spine, its indication for C1-C2 fusion has not been well characterized. In our institution, we apply rhBMP-2 to the C1-C2 joint either alone or with hydroxyapatite, locally harvested autograft chips, and/or morselized allogenic bone graft for selected cases-without conventional posterior structural bone graft. We report the clinical outcomes of the surgical technique to elucidate its feasibility.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective review of data from 2008 to 2016 and identified 69 patients who had undergone posterior atlantoaxial fusion with rhBMP-2. The clinical records of these patients were reviewed, and the baseline characteristics, operative data, and postoperative complications were collected and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The average age of the 69 patients was 60.8 ± 4.5 years, and 55.1% were women. With an average follow-up period of 21.1 ± 4.2 months, the C1-C2 fusion rate was 94.3% (65 of 69), and the average time to fusion was 11.4 ± 2.6 months (range, 5-23). The overall reoperation rate was 10.1% (7 of 69), with instrumentation failure in 7 patients (10.1%), adjacent segment disease in 2 (2.9%), and postoperative dysphagia and dyspnea in 2 patients (2.9%). No ectopic bone formation or soft tissue edema developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although retrospective and from a single center, our study has shown that rhBMP-2 usage at the C1-C2 joint without posterior structural bone grafting is a safe and reasonable surgical option.

Reoperation for Symptomatic Nonunions in Atlantoaxial (C1-C2) Fusions with and without Bone Morphogenetic Protein: A Cohort of 108 Patients with >2 Years Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in atlantoaxial (C1-C2) fusions with or without bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) using data from a national spine registry and to analyze the different types of bone grafts used in the non-BMP group.

METHODS

Data from the Kaiser Permanente spine registry were used to identify patients with C1-C2 fusions with >2 years follow-up. Patient characteristics, diagnosis, operative times, length of stay, and reoperations were extracted from the registry. The data set was divided into patients with and without BMP. Further analysis was made of the different types of non-BMP grafts as well as the instrumentation used.

RESULTS

In our cohort, we found 58 patients (53.7%) with BMP and 50 patients (46.3%) without with an average follow-up time of 5 years (interquartile range, 2.04-8.49). The BMP versus non-BMP groups differed in admitting diagnosis, operative times, length of stay, and follow-up times. There were no reoperations for symptomatic nonunions in both groups. The non-BMP group included iliac crest graft (with or without allograft [+/-] allograft); lamina (+/- allograft); and allograft alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Using one of the largest retrospective studies on C1-C2 fusions with and without BMP, we found no difference in reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions. For the non-BMP group, we found that lamina (+/- allograft) or allograft alone may also be just as effective as iliac crest graft (+/- allograft) in having no reoperations for symptomatic nonunions.

Freehand technique for C2 pedicle and pars screw placement: is it safe?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

During placement of C2 pedicle and pars screws, intraoperative fluoroscopy is used so that neurovascular complications can be avoided, and screws can be placed in the proper position. However, this method is time consuming and increases radiation exposure. Furthermore, it does not guarantee a completely safe and accurate screw placement.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of the C2 pedicle and pars screw placement without fluoroscopic or other guidance methods.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred ninety-eight patients who underwent placement of C2 pedicle or pars screws without any intraoperative radiographic guidance were included in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Medical records and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data were reviewed for intraoperative and postoperative complications. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated with postop CT scans using a previously published cortical-breach grading system (described by the location and the percentage of the screw diameter over the cortical edge [0=none, Grade I≤25% of the screw diameter, Grade II=26%-50%, Grade III=51%-75%, and Grade IV=76%-100%]).

RESULTS

A total of 148 pedicle screws and 219 pars screws were inserted by two experienced surgeons. There were no cases of cerebral spinal fluid leakage and no neurovascular complications during screw placement. Postoperative CT scans were available for 76 patients, which included 52 pedicle screws and 87 pars screws. For cases with C2 pedicle screws, there were 12 breaches (23%); these included 10 screws with a Grade I breach (19%), 1 screw with a Grade II breach (2%), and 1 screw with a Grade IV breach (2%). Lateral breaches occurred in seven screws (13%), inferior breaches occurred in three screws (6%), and superior breaches occurred in two screws (4%). For cases with C2 pars screws, there were 10 breaches (11%); these included 6 screws with a Grade I breach (7%), 2 screws with a Grade II breach (2%), and 2 screws with a Grade IV breach (2%). Medial breaches were found in four (5%), lateral breaches in two (2%), inferior breaches in two (2%), and superior breaches in two (2%). Two of the cases with superior breaches (one for pedicle and one for pars) experienced occipital neuralgia months after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of overall and high-grade breaches between the groups (p=.07 and 1.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although even in experienced hands up to 23% of C2 pedicle screws and 11% of C2 pars screws placed using a freehand technique without guidance may be malpositioned, a clear majority of malpositioned screws demonstrated a low-grade breach, and only 2 of 198 patients (1%) experienced complications related to screw placement.

Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Postoperative Outcomes After C1-C2 Pedicle Screw Techniques for Pediatric Atlantoaxial Rotatory Dislocation

BACKGROUND

Although C1-C2 pedicle screw techniques have been extensively reported in pediatric series, reports on their use have examined only small series with short follow-up periods. The aim of this study was to report pediatric patients with atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation treated with these techniques with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of 27 pediatric patients with atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation who underwent C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation between 2004 and 2012. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected and compared with a control group.

RESULTS

Follow-up period was 60-142 months (mean 84 months). Torticollis was completely corrected postoperatively in all but 1 patient. All patients experienced significant pain relief and improvement in range of motion, and 6 patients with neurologic deficits experienced significant improvement postoperatively. Both atlantodental interval and space available for the cord were significantly improved compared with preoperative values. At final follow-up, curvature was lordotic in 20 cases and straight in 7 cases. Compared with the control group, range of motion of the patient group was not significantly different in any direction except in flexion and rotation. Mean anteroposterior diameters of the spinal canal at C1 and C2 levels were not significantly different from the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

C1-C2 pedicle screw techniques are safe and effective for treatment of atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation and result in no obvious limitation on growth in older children.

Machined cervical interfacet allograft spacers for the management of atlantoaxial instability

Background:

The use of cervical interfacet spacers (CISs) to augment stability and provide solid arthrodesis at the atlantoaxial joint has not been studied in detail. The aim of this work is to report the outcomes with the use of machined allograft CISs at C1-2.

Methods:

A retrospective review of 19 patients who underwent an atlantoaxial fusion with the use of CISs was performed. All patients had instability documented with flexion and extension lateral radiographs. This instability was due to trauma, degenerative stenosis, symptomatic C1-2 arthropathy, and os odontoideum. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed. Fusion was determined based on a lack of hardware failure, absence of motion on flexion and extension plain X-ray films, and presence of bridging trabecular bone which was most often demonstrated by a computed tomography.

Results:

The mean age was 69.1 ± 12.9 years. Eight patients had traumatic fractures, six patients had degenerative stenosis, two patients had C2 neuralgia due to C1-2 arthropathy, two patients had C1-2 ligamentous subluxation, and one patient had an unstable os odontoideum. The occiput or subaxial spine was included in the arthrodesis in 10 patients. Rib autograft was utilized in most patients. No patient had postoperative neurological worsening, malposition of hardware, or vertebral artery injury and there were no mortalities. The fusion rate was 95%. The mean follow-up was 12.1 ± 5.5 months.

Conclusions:

CIS is a promising adjuvant for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability.

Improving C1-C2 Complex Fusion Rates: An Alternate Approach

The surgical repair of atlantoaxial instabilities (AAI) presents complex and unique challenges, originating from abnormalities and/or trauma within the junction regions of the C1-C2 atlas-axis, to surgeons. When this region is destabilized, surgical fusion becomes of key importance in order to prevent spinal cord injury. Several techniques can be utilized to provide for the adequate fusion of the atlantoaxial construct. Nevertheless, many individuals have less than ideal rates of fusion, below 35%-40%, which also involves the C2 nerve root being sacrificed. This suboptimal and unavoidable iatrogenic complication results in the elevated probability of complications typically composed of vertebral artery injury. This review is a retrospective analysis of 87 patients from Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, who had the C1-C2 surgical fusion procedure performed within the time frame from 2001 to 2008, with a mean follow-up period of three years. These patients had presented with typical AAI symptoms of fatigability, limited mobility, and clumsiness. Diagnosis of C1-C2 instability was documented via radiographic studies, typically utilizing computed tomography (CT) scans or x-rays. All patients had bilateral C1 lateral masses and C2 pedicle screws. In addition, the C1-C2 joint was accessed by retracting the C2 nerve root superiorly and exposing the joint by utilizing a high-speed burr. The cavity that is developed within the joint is packed with local autologous bone from the cephalad resection of the C2 laminae. Fusion of the C1-C2 joint was achieved in all patients and a final follow-up was conducted approximately three years postoperative. Of the 87 patients, two presented with occipital headaches resulting from the C1 screws impinging on the C2 nerve root. The issue was rectified by removing instrumentation in both patients after documenting complete fusion via radiographic studies, with complete resolution of symptoms. No vertebral artery or spinal cord injuries were reported as a result of the minor complication. Overall, we aim to describe a safe and reliable alternative technique to fuse C1-C2 instability by focusing on intra-articular arthrodesis complementing instrumentation fixation. This methodology is advantageous from a biomechanical standpoint secondary to axial loading, as well as the large surface area available for arthrodesis. Additionally, this technique does not involve the resection of the C2 nerve root, resulting in low risk for vertebral artery or spinal cord injury.

When does intraoperative 3D-imaging play a role in transpedicular C2 screw placement?

INTRODUCTION

The stabilization of an atlantoaxial (C1-C2) instability is demanding due to a complex atlantoaxial anatomy with proximity to the spinal cord, a variable run of the vertebral artery (VA) and narrow C2 pedicles. We perfomed the Goel & Harms fusion in combination with an intraoperative 3D imaging to ensure correct screw placement in the C2 pedicle. We hypothesized, that narrow C2 pedicles lead to a higher malposition rate of screws by perforation of the pedicle wall. The purpose of this study was to describe a certain pedicle size, under which the perforation rate rises.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients (n=30) were operated in the Goel & Harms technique. The isthmus height and pedicle diameter of C2 were measured. The achieved screw position in C2 was evaluated according to Gertzbein & Robbin classification (GRGr).

RESULTS

A statistically significant correlation was found between the pedicles size (isthmus height/pedicle diameter) and the achieved GRGr for the right (p=0.002/p=0.03) and left side (p=0.018/p=0.008). The ROC analysis yielded a Cut Off value for the pedicle size to distinguish between an intact or perforated pedicle wall (GRGr 1 or ≥2). The Cut-Off value was identified for the isthmus height (right 6.1mm, left 5.4mm) and for the pedicle diameter (6.6mm both sides).

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis, that narrow pedicles lead to a higher perforation rate of the pedicle wall, can be accepted. Pedicles of <6.6mm turned out to be a risk factor for a perforation of the pedicle wall (GRGr 2 or higher). Intraoperative 3D imaging is a feasible tool to confirm optimal screw position, which becomes even more important in cases with thin pedicles. The rising risk of VA injury in these cases support the additional use of navigation.

Does Transection of the C2 Nerve Roots During C1 Lateral Mass Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Fixation Result in a Superior Outcome?: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of transection of the C2 roots during C1 lateral mass screw placement for atlantoaxial fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Transection of the C2 nerve roots has been recommended during atlantoaxial fixation to facilitate C1 lateral mass screw placement and possibly reduce postoperative occipital neuralgia, although this practice remains controversial.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating the outcomes of C1-2 fixation involving sacrifice of the C2 roots. We calculated transformed proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the outcomes of occipital neuralgia, numbness, bony fusion, and procedural morbidity. For studies comparing C2 transection with nerve sparing surgery, we performed meta-analyses for the outcomes of occipital neuralgia, occipital numbness, blood loss, and operative time.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies (N = 393) met eligibility criteria. The rate of postoperative occipital neuralgia among included studies was 0% to 25%; occipital numbness, 6.7% to100%; bony fusion, 96.7% to 100%; and procedural morbidity, 0% to 14.3%. Among comparative studies, C2 transection was associated with a higher rate of occipital numbness [odds ratio (OR) 178.6 (95% CI 26.6 to 1198.4)], lower blood loss [mean difference (MD) -195.3 mL (95% CI -317.7 to -72.8 mL)] and shorter operative times [MD -57.5 mins (95% CI -76.9 to -38.2 mins)] than when the C2 roots were spared. We found no difference in rates of occipital neuralgia [OR 1.44 (95% CI 0.45 to 4.68)].

CONCLUSION

Transection of the C2 nerve roots appears to be a viable, safe option when undertaking placement of C1 lateral mass screws. The procedure is associated with reduced operative duration and blood loss, increased rate of occipital numbness, and no change in the rate of occipital neuralgia. However, given the relatively low quality of evidence, prospective, controlled studies to evaluate this strategy are recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N /A.

C2 and Greater Occipital Nerve: The Anatomic and Functional Implications in Spinal Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Posterior C1-C2 fusion is a highly successful treatment for atlantoaxial instability and other pathologies of the cervical spine, with fusion rates approaching 95%-100%. However, poor visualization of the lateral masses of C1 secondary to the course of the C2 nerve root along with blood loss from the venous plexus and compression of the C2 nerve from lateral mass screws are technical obstacles that can arise during surgery. Thus, sacrifice of the C2 nerve root has long since been debated in fusions involving the C1 and C2 vertebral bodies.

METHODS

Cadaveric dissections on four adult specimens were performed. Both intradural and extradural courses of C2 were studied in detail. The tentative site of C2 nerve root compression during placement of C1 lateral mass screws was studied in detail. Both the indication as well as the ease of C2 neurectomy were studied in relation to postoperative compression and entrapment.

RESULTS

Four-six dorsal rootlets of C2 nerve were observed while studying the intradural course. The extradural course was studied with respect to the lateral mass of C1. The greater occipital nerve (GON) course was fairly consistent in all specimens. Transection of C2 around its ganglion would allow for proper C1 lateral mass screw placement as the course of C2 nerve interferes with proper placement of instrumentation.

CONCLUSION

C2 nerve root transection is associated with occipital numbness but this often has no effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The C2 nerve root preservation is often associated with entrapment neuropathy or occipital neuralgia, which greatly affects HRQOL. The C2 nerve root transection helps in better visualization, aids in optimal placement of C1 lateral mass screws, minimizes estimated blood loss and improves surgical outcome with successful fusion.

Biomechanical Assessment of Stabilization of Simulated Type II Odontoid Fracture with Case Study

STUDY DESIGN

Researchers created a proper type II dens fracture (DF) and quantified a novel current posterior fixation technique with spacers at C1-C2. A clinical case study supplements this biomechanical analysis.

PURPOSE

Researchers explored their hypothesis that spacers combined with posterior instrumentation (PI) reduce range of motion significantly, possibly leading to better fusion outcomes.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Literature shows that the atlantoaxial joint is unique in allowing segmental rotary motion, enabling head turning. With no intervertebral discs at these joints, multiple ligaments bind the axis to the skull base and to the atlas; an intact odontoid (dens) enhances stability. The most common traumatic injury at these strong ligaments is a type II odontoid fracture.

METHODS

Each of seven specimens (C0-C3) was tested on a custom-built six-degrees-of-freedom spine simulator with constructs of intact state, type II DF, C1-C2 PI, PI with joint capsulotomy (PIJC), PI with spacers (PIS) at C1-C2, and spacers alone (SA). A bending moment of 2.0 Nm (1.5°/sec) was applied in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). One-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was performed.

RESULTS

DF increased motion to 320%, 429%, and 120% versus intact (FE, LB, and AR, respectively). PI significantly reduced motion to 41%, 21%, and 8%. PIJC showed negligible changes from PI. PIS reduced motion to 16%, 14%, and 3%. SA decreased motion to 64%, 24%, and 54%. Reduced motion facilitated solid fusion in an 89-year-old female patient within 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Type II odontoid fractures can lead to acute or chronic instability. Current fixation techniques use C1-C2 PI or an anterior dens screw. Addition of spacers alongside PI led to increased biomechanical rigidity over intact motion and may offer an alternative to established surgical fixation techniques.

Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study

STUDY DESIGN

This was an interventional human cadaver study and radiological study.

OBJECTIVES

Atlas instrumentation is frequently involved in fusion procedures involving the craniocervical junction area. Identification of the entry point at the center of atlas lateral mass (ALM) is challenging because of its rounded posterior surface and the surrounding venous plexus. This report examines using the medial edge of atlas posterior arch (MEC1) as a fixed and reliable anatomic reference to guide the entry point of ALM screws.

METHODS

Fifty, normal, cervical spine computed tomography studies were reviewed. ALM screw trajectories were planned at one point along MEC1 and another point 2 mm lateral to MEC1. Free-hand ALM instrumentation was performed in ten fresh human cadavers using the 2 mm entry point, with a sagittal trajectory parallel to atlas inferior arch (IAC1); three-dimensional imaging was then performed to confirm instrumentation accuracy.

RESULTS

The average ALM diameter was 12.35 mm. Inserting a screw using the entry point 2 mm lateral to MEC1 was closer to ALM midpoint than using the entry point along MEC1 (P < 0.0001). Twenty ALM screws were successfully inserted in the ten cadavers. No encroachments into the spinal canal or foramen transversarium occurred. However, two screws were superiorly directed and violated the occipitocervical joint; they were not parallel to IAC1.

CONCLUSION

MEC1 provides a fixed and reliable landmark for ALM instrumentation. An entry point 2 mm point lateral to MEC1 is close to ALM midpoint. IAC1 also provides a guide for the sagittal trajectory. Attention to anatomic landmarks may help reduce complications associated with atlas instrumentation but should be verified in future clinical studies.