Surgical management of spinal metastases: analysis of prognostic factors during a 10-year experience

Surgical management of spinal metastases: A cross-continental study in the United States and the Netherlands

Background

There is currently no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for patients with spinal metastases. Investigating regional variations in surgical management could provide valuable insights to optimize care and refine surgical practices globally.

Objective

To investigate differences in patient populations, surgical management, and perioperative outcomes among patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases in either Boston (United States) or Utrecht (Netherlands).

Methods

727 patients surgically treated for spinal metastases in Boston (n=539) and Utrecht (n=188) between 2018-2022 were included. Data on patient characteristics, surgical management, perioperative outcomes, and survival were collected. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous data, and Fisher's exact test for categorical data.

Results

In Boston, a higher percentage of patients had three or more spinal metastases (68% vs 59%; p=0.006) and brain metastases (16% vs 4.3%; p<0.001) at the time of surgery compared with Utrecht. Vertebrectomy/corpectomy with stabilization was performed in 54% of patients in Boston versus none in Utrecht (p<0.001), whereas percutaneous stabilization was performed in 1.3% of patients in Boston versus 39% in Utrecht (p<0.001). In Utrecht, patients received postoperative radiotherapy more frequently (70% vs 54%; p<0.001) and earlier (17 days [IQR:12-24] vs 29 days [IQR:23-39]; p<0.001). Postoperative neurological outcome, complications, reoperation rates, and survival did not differ between the two cohorts (all p>0.05).

Conclusions

Differences in patient populations and surgical management exist between tertiary hospitals on separate continents. Further research is needed to determine the optimal extent and timing of surgery to improve quality of life for patients with spinal metastases.

Poroelastic Characterization of Human Vertebral Metastases to Inform a Transdisciplinary Assessment of Spinal Tumors

Background and Objectives: Vertebral metastases often lead to pathological fractures and spinal cord compression, thus impacting patient quality of life. This study aimed to quantify the poroelastic mechanical properties of vertebral metastatic tissue explanted during spine surgery and correlate it with clinical data. Methods: Nine patients (61.7 ± 13.1 years) were prospectively recruited from April 2021 to February 2022, where 78% had a vertebral fracture. Demographic and metastases data, including primary origin, spinal level, lesion volume, and SINS score, were collected, and tissue specimens were explanted during surgery. Using a newly developed portable experimental setup, confined compression creep tests were conducted to measure the aggregate modulus and permeability of each sample. Dealing with limited samples, the results were expressed as the median (min; max). Results: Specimens from the unfractured vertebrae had higher aggregate modulus (200.35 (149.80; 250.90) kPa vs. 14.47 (8.27; 35.89) kPa) and higher permeability (0.02 (0.01; 0.03) mm4/N·s vs. 0.41 (0.10; 4.68) mm4/N·s) compared with the specimens from the fractured vertebrae. Histology revealed prominent levels of neoplastic cell infiltration and disruption of typical bone matrix architecture. Specimens with low neoplastic cellularity had comparable or slightly higher poroelastic properties compared to high cellularity. No clear trend was observed between the mechanical properties and SINS score, nor between the mechanical properties, percentage lesion volume, and fractures. Conclusions: Despite the limited sample size, the poroelastic characterization revealed relevant insights to investigate in future research. A transdisciplinary assessment of vertebral metastases, incorporating poroelastic testing, deserves further attention and could enhance the treatment options.

Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes of Surgically Treated Patients With Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: Results From Epidemiology, Process, and Outcomes of Spine Oncology (EPOSO), a Prospective, Multi-Institutional and International Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The palliative impact of spine surgery for metastatic disease is evolving with improvements in surgical technique and multidisciplinary cancer care. The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate long-term clinical outcomes including health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures, using spine cancer-specific patient-reported-outcome (PRO) measures, in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases who underwent surgical management.

METHODS

The Epidemiology, Process, and Outcomes of Spine Oncology (EPOSO, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01825161) trial is a prospective-observational cohort study that included 10 specialist centers in North America and Europe. Patients aged 18 to 75 years who underwent surgery for spinal metastases were included. Prospective assessments included both spine tumor-specific and generic PRO tools which were collected for a minimum of 2 years post-treatment or until death.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty patients (51.8% female, mean age 57.9 years) were included. At presentation, the mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6.0, 35.7% had neurological deficits as defined by the American Spinal Cord Injury Association scores, 47.2% had high-grade epidural spinal cord compression (2-3), and 89.6% had impending or frank instability as measured by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score of ≥7. The most common primary tumor sites were breast (20.2%), lung (18.8%), kidney (16.2%), and prostate (6.5%). The median overall survival postsurgery was 501 days, and the 2-year progression-free-survival rate was 38.4%. Compared with baseline, significant and durable improvements in HRQOL were observed at the 6-week, 12-week, 26-week, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up assessments from a battery of PRO questionnaires including the spine cancer-specific, validated, Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire v2.0, the Short Form 36 version 2, EuroQol-5 Dimension (3L), and pain numerical rating scale score.

CONCLUSION

Multi-institutional, prospective-outcomes data confirm that surgical decompression and/or stabilization provides meaningful and durable improvements in multiple HRQOL domains, including spine-specific outcomes based on the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire v2.0, for patients with metastatic spine disease.

The effect of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy on fusion rate in spinal surgery using osteobiologics for patients with metastatic spinal disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact that adjuvant therapies like radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy have on osteobiologic properties and bony regeneration in patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD) undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov searches were performed. MSD patients undergoing fusion surgery with an osteobiologic and radiotherapy, chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy were included. Demographics, primary tumor, surgery, adjuvant treatments, osteobiologic type, fusion rates with scoring criteria, hardware failure, reoperation rates, follow-up, and survival were extracted. 1487 studies were screened, 20 included.

RESULTS

585 patients (464 with MSD) had fusion rates ranging from 17.9 to 100%. In the setting of radiotherapy, fusion rates of 10 studies using autologous bone graft (autograft), 5 studies using allogenic bone graft (allograft), 5 studies using combination autograft/allograft, 4 studies using biomaterial scaffolds (BMS), 3 studies using demineralized bone matrices (DBM), and 1 study using growth factors (GF), were 50-100%, 17.9-100%, 57.8-100%, 52.9-100%, 20-100%, and 100%, respectively. A higher incidence of fusion in patients with autograft or allograft receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) at lower biologically effective doses (BED) and at least 1-month postoperatively was noted. Chemotherapy had no impact on fusion. No studies evaluated the impact of immunotherapy on fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT at lower doses given greater than 1-month postoperatively may enhance bony fusion in patients receiving autograft, allograft, or autograft/allograft. Chemotherapy may delay bony fusion without affecting overall fusion rates. Preclinical studies suggest immunotherapy may prevent osteolysis and promote osteogenesis, but no studies have yet evaluated the clinical impact of these findings on spinal fusion. Further research is needed on osteobiologics in bony regeneration in the MSD population.

Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Metastases Managed with Surgical Intervention

BACKGROUND

Spinal metastases are a significant cause of morbidity in patients with advanced cancer, and management often requires surgical intervention. Although prior studies have identified factors that influence outcomes with surgery, the ability of these factors to predict outcomes remains unclear in the era of contemporary therapies, and there is a need to better identify patients who are likely to benefit from surgery.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis to evaluate risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with spinal metastases treated with surgery. The primary outcome was mortality at 180 days.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were identified. Age ≥ 65 years at surgery (p = 0.0316), presence of extraspinal metastases (p = 0.0110), and ECOG performance scores >1 (p = 0.0397) were associated with mortality at 180 days on multivariate analysis. These factors and BMI ≤ 30 mg/kg2 (p = 0.0008) were also associated with worse overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Age > 65, extraspinal metastases, and performance status scores >1 are factors associated with mortality at 180 days in patients with spinal metastases treated with surgery. Patients with these factors and BMI ≤ 30 mg/kg2 had worse overall survival. Our results support multidisciplinary discussions regarding the benefits and risks associated with surgery in patients with these risk factors.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: Neurological status, Oncologic tumor behavior, Mechanical stability, and Systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: neurological status, Oocologic tumor behavior, mechanical stability and systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

DEVELOPMENT OF A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF SELECTING THE EXTENT OF A SURGICAL INTERVENTION IN SPINAL TUMOR

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To develop a mathematical model of selecting the extent of surgical intervention in the spinal tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: The retrospective study included 237 patients with spinal tumors who underwent the following surgeries: vertebroplasty (V); vertebroplasty and spinal fixation (F+V); posterior spinal decompression and spinal fixation (F+F); vertebrectomy and replacement of vertebra by a cage with posterior spinal fixation (F+F+K). The mathematical model is based on the modified Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). The patients were divided into two clusters. Cluster analysis was used to build a diagnostic decision tree model.

RESULTS

Results: The difference between two clusters is determined by the extent of surgical intervention, the grade of the vertebral lesion, epidural compression, and local kyphosis, and neurological signs as well. The cluster 1 included 115 patients with higher values of SINS compared to the cluster 2. All cases of vertebroplasty belonged to the cluster 2. In the cluster 1 cases of surgery of large extent: F+F; F+V; F+F+K. Analysis of the decision tree model for cluster 1 showed that a type of surgery was determined for 97 patients from 115 that relates to 84.3% of overall accuracy. The decision tree model have a high predictive accuracy for the surgery F+V and better indicators of coverage and predictive accuracy for the surgery F+F+K.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Our study developed a decision tree model to optimize spinal neoplasm surgery, achieving 84.3% accuracy based on significant prognosis criteria. The model considers surgical type, neurological signs, vertebra lesion grade, and stage of epidural compression, potentially improving clinical outcomes.

Spinal metastases of bronchopulmonary cancers: interest of balloon kyphoplasty in the control of mechanical rachialgia

Introduction

Spinal metastases are a classic complication of lung cancer. New palliative treatment modalities have emerged. Among them are minimally invasive approaches such as balloon kyphoplasty. With the aim of evaluating the efficiency of balloon kyphoplasty in the control of spinal pain during these lesions, we report a series of 24 patients.

Methods and materials

Over a period of 6 years, we retrospectively studied 24 files of patients suffering from vertebral compression of metastatic pulmonary origin and treated by balloon kyphoplasty from January 2009 to December 2014 in the neurosurgery department of the North Hospital of Marseille (France).

Results

The mean age was 66.2 years (39–80 years) with a sex ratio of 5. Dorsal location was predominantly 17 cases. Balloon kyphoplasty involved one level in 14 patients. The general condition (Karnofski) was bad in 16 patients. Survival prediction was less than 6 months in 22 patients. The indication was mainly pain with a mean visual analog scale of 7.7. The evolution was marked by the regression of the painful symptomatology in all patients with a mean visual analog scale of 2.2 postoperatively. Postoperative complications were noted in two cases (pulmonary embolism, compression of the left iliac vein).

Conclusion

Our short series shows the efficacy and low morbidity of balloon kyphoplasty in the control of spinal pain secondary to vertebral metastases of bronchopulmonary cancers.

Spinal Metastases and the Evolving Role of Molecular Targeted Therapy, Chemotherapy, and Immunotherapy

Metastatic involvement of the spine is a common complication of systemic cancer progression. Surgery and external beam radiotherapy are palliative treatment modalities aiming to preserve neurological function, control pain and maintain functional status. More recently, with development of image guidance and stereotactic delivery of high doses of conformal radiation, local tumor control has improved; however recurrent or radiation refractory disease remains a significant clinical problem with limited treatment options. This manuscript represents a narrative overview of novel targeted molecular therapies, chemotherapies, and immunotherapy treatments for patients with breast, lung, melanoma, renal cell, prostate, and thyroid cancers, which resulted in improved responses compared to standard chemotherapy. We present clinical examples of excellent responses in spinal metastatic disease which have not been specifically documented in the literature, as most clinical trials evaluate treatment response based on visceral disease. This review is useful for the spine surgeons treating patients with metastatic disease as knowledge of these responses could help with timing and planning of surgical interventions, as well as promote multidisciplinary discussions, allowing development of an individualized treatment strategy to patients presenting with widespread multifocal progressive disease, where surgery could lead to suboptimal results.

Prognostic Analysis of Spinal Metastasis Secondary to Lung Cancer after Surgeries: A Unicentric, Large-Cohort, Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Spinal metastases of lung cancer (SMLC) usually have high degree of malignancy and require surgical treatment. However, there are several controversies about the efficacy of surgery. This study aimed to investigate factors predicting prognosis of SMLC after surgery-based comprehensive treatment.

METHODS

A cohort of 112 cases of SMLC who underwent surgical treatment between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The surgical strategies included total en-bloc spondylectomy, debulking surgery, palliative decompression, and vertebral augmentation procedures. The patients were regularly followed-up. Survival analysis was performed, as well as analysis of the patients' neurological recovery, pain relief, and improvement of Karnosky performance score (KPS). Cox regression was used to analyze influencing factors of survival time, and Kaplan-Meier method was performed in survival analysis.

RESULTS

The cohort included 63 males and 49 females, with an average age of 60.6 ± 10.6 years. Median survival time was 16 months. A total of 86.7% of paralysis patients' neurological function recovered and 83.9% of patients with low KPS score (10-40) improved. Surgical method was significantly correlated with improvement of neurological function (p < 0.001) and KPS (p < 0.001). The mean bleeding volume was 502 ml and operative time was 170 min. The survival rates at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 92.0%, 80.4%, 63.4%, 63.4%, and 22.6%, respectively. Postoperative Frankel grade (p < 0.001), postoperative KPS score (p = 0.001), and application of molecular targeted drugs (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with survival time in univariate analysis, while application of molecular targeted drugs was an independent predictor for a longer survival by a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Surgery-based comprehensive treatment brought a fair outcome, with elongated survival time. Surgery can significantly improve patients' neurological function and physical performance status. Adjuvant targeted therapy is an independent positive factor for patients' survival.

Bone Cement and Pedicle Screw for the Treatment of Spinal Tumors with Spinal Cord Compression and Posterior Wall Defects

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of posterior internal fixation with open vertebroplasty (VP) and posterior internal fixation with open kyphoplasty (KP) in the treatment of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) with posterior wall destruction.

METHODS

This retrospective study, conducted between January 2016 and May 2019, equally divided 60 patients with MESCC and posterior wall destruction into two groups based on the surgical method: open vertebroplasty with pedicle screw fixation (VP group) and open kyphoplasty with pedicle screw fixation (KP group). Visual analogue scale (VAS), SF-36 scores, middle vertebral height (MVH), and posterior vertebral height (PVH) were evaluated for the two groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and 1 year after surgery. Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score, Frankel grades and complications were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Five patients were excluded from the analysis, and our study cohort consisted of 55 adult patients who met the inclusion criteria. The VAS and SF-36 scores of these two groups of patients significantly improved, when compared with those before the surgery (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in total cost (8835 ± 1468 vs 9540 ± 053 USD) and cement volume (4.51 ± 0.96 ml vs 6.35 ± 1.09 ml) between two groups (P < 0.05). The MVH and PVH of these two groups of patients significantly improved, when compared with those before the surgery (P < 0.05). The MVH was significantly larger in the KP group than in the VP group postoperatively (20.15 ± 4.86 vs 17.70 ± 3.78, P < 0.05) and at the final follow-up (20.42 ± 5.59 vs 17.28 ± 3.23, P < 0.05). However, the PVH of the two groups did not significantly differ at the two postoperative follow-ups (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in surgery time, time from surgery to discharge, blood loss and complications between both groups postoperatively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the short term, both approaches are effective and safe in patients with MESCC and posterior wall destruction. The posterior internal fixation with open VP may be a good choice of surgical method in patients with MESCC and posterior wall defects.

Prognostic scores for survival as decisional support for surgery in spinal metastases: a performance assessment systematic review

PURPOSE

To review the evidence on the relative prognostic performance of the available prognostic scores for survival in spinal metastatic surgery in order to provide a recommendation for use in clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review of comparative external validation studies assessing the performance of prognostic scores for survival in independent cohorts was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through Medline and Embase until May 2021. Studies were included when they compared at least four survival scoring systems in surgical or mixed cohorts across all primary tumor types. Predictive performance was assessed based on discrimination and calibration for 3-month, 1-year and overall survival, and generalizability was assessed based on the characteristics of the development cohort and external validation cohorts. Risk of bias and concern regarding applicability were assessed based on the 'Prediction model study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool' (PROBAST).

RESULTS

Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and covered 17 scoring systems across 5.130 patients. Several scores suffer from suboptimal development and validation. The SORG Nomogram, developed in a large surgical cohort, showed good discrimination on 3-month and 1-year survival, good calibration and was superior in direct comparison with low risk of bias and low concern regarding applicability. Machine learning algorithms are promising as they perform equally well in direct comparison. Tokuhashi, Tomita and other traditional risk scores showed suboptimal performance.

CONCLUSION

The SORG Nomogram and machine learning algorithms outline superior performance in survival prediction for surgery in spinal metastases. Further improvement by comparative validation in large multicenter, prospective cohorts can still be obtained. Given the heterogeneity of spinal metastases, superior methodology of development and validation is key in improving future machine learning systems.

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma to the Spine: Outcomes and Morbidity: Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma with metastases to the spine (RCCMS) requires a multidisciplinary approach. We reviewed our institutional experience with RCCMS patients undergoing spinal surgery in order to identify factors that may affect clinical outcomes, survival, and complications.

METHODS

Patients with RCCMS who underwent operative intervention from 2007 to 2020 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients with the diagnosis of RCCMS were identified. Pain was the most common symptom, and neurologic dysfunction was present in one third of cases. Thoracic spine was the most common location (N = 27), followed by the lumbar (N = 12) and cervical (N = 5) regions. The overall survival from diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma was 25 (2 - 194) months and 8 (0.3 - 92) months after spinal surgery. Gender, age, spinal level, postoperative radiation, and nephrectomy had no bearing on survival. Survival for patients with a Tokuhashi score of 0 - 8, 9 - 11, and 12 - 15 was 6.5 (1.5 - 23.5), 8.9 (0.3 - 91.6), and 23.4 (2.5 - 66) months, respectively (P = 0.03). The postoperative American Spinal Cord Injury Association score of E (hazard ratio 0.109 [95% confidence interval 0.022 - 0.534, P = 0.006) also bore a significant influence on survival. There was a total of 10 complications in 7 of 44 (16%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Median postoperative survival of patients with RCCMS was 8 (0.3 - 92) months. Higher Tokuhashi score and ASIA E score at follow-up correlated with improved overall survival. Complication rate was 16%. Spinal surgery in RCCMS is indicated for the preservation of function and prevention of neurologic deterioration. Multimodality therapy with improved chemotherapy and stereotactic spinal radiation is expected to impact quality and length of survival positively.

Establishment and validation of nomogram model for survival predicting in patients with spinal metastases secondary to lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic effect of pre-treatment factors in patients with spinal metastases secondary to lung cancer, and establish a novel predicting nomogram for predicting the survival probability.

METHODS

A total of 209 patients operated for spinal metastases from lung cancer were consecutively enrolled, and divided into the training and validation samples with a ratio of 7:3, for model establishing and validating, respectively. Basing on the training sample, univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard models were used for identifying the prognostic effect of pre-treatment factors, following which significant prognostic factors would be listed as items in nomogram to calculate the survival probabilities at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Then, the C-indexes and the calibration curves would be figured out to evaluate the discrimination ability and accuracy of the model both for the training and validation samples.

RESULTS

In the multivariate COX analysis, the gender, smoking history, location of spinal metastasis, visceral metastasis, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), adjuvant therapy, lymphocyte percentage and globulin were found to be significantly associated with the overall survival, and a novel nomogram was generated basing on these independent predictors. The C-indexes for the training and validation samples were 0.761 and 0.732, respectively. Favorable consistencies between the predicted and actual survival rates were demonstrated both in the internal and external validations.

DISCUSSION

Pre-treatment characteristics, including gender, smoking history, location of spinal metastasis, visceral metastasis, KPS, adjuvant therapy, percentage of lymphocyte, and serum globulin level, were identified to be significantly associated with overall survival of patients living with spinal metastases derived from lung cancer, and a user-friendly nomogram was established using these independent predictors.

A Novel Prediction Tool for Overall Survival of Patients Living with Spinal Metastatic Disease

OBJECTIVE

To identify the significant prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with spinal metastases and to establish an online widget for predicting survival with an interactive visual approach.

METHODS

Patients operated for spinal metastases between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled and were randomly divided into training and validation samples with a ratio of 7:3. Patients' characteristics were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox analyses to identify independent prognostic factors basing on the training sample. A shiny web tool was developed by transforming the fitted multivariable Cox model into a visual interface. Time-dependent area under the curve plot and calibration curve were generated to assess the discrimination ability and consistency of the novel model, both for the training and validation samples.

RESULTS

A total of 265 consecutive patients were finally included, with 185 in the training sample and 80 in the validation sample. The primary tumor types, lesion site of metastasis, visceral metastasis, Frankel grade, operation category, number of surgical segments, and the preoperative percentage of lymphocyte were demonstrated to be significantly associated with overall survival. A novel shiny model (https://yang1209xg.shinyapps.io/predictspinalmetastasis/) that could provide predicted survival curve and median survival time was established, with favorable discrimination ability and consistency between predicted and actual survival both in internal and external data, according to time-dependent area under the curve plots and calibration curves.

CONCLUSIONS

A user-friendly shiny app with favorable discrimination ability and consistency was released online for predicting the survival of patients with spinal metastases. A continuous survival curve and the predicted median survival time are available to guide the treatment planning.

The importance of multidisciplinary care for spine metastases: initial tumor management

Spine metastases are very common in cancer patients often requiring urgent assessment and the initiation of therapy. Treatment paradigms have changed exponentially over the past decade with the evolution and integration of stereotactic body radiotherapy, minimally invasive spine techniques, and systemic options including biologics and checkpoint inhibitors. These advances necessitate multidisciplinary assessments and interventions to optimize outcomes. The NOMS framework provides a mechanism for all practitioners to evaluate the 4 sentinel assessments required to make decisions in patients with spine metastases: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical Stability, and Systemic disease. The NOMS framework is continuously updated with the integration of newer technologies and evidence-based medicine as they become available. This paper presents the current iteration of NOMS with a focus on the role of medical and neuro-oncologists in the assessment and treatment of metastatic spine tumors.

Quality Improvement Initiative to Enhance Multidisciplinary Management of Malignant Extradural Spinal Cord Compression

PURPOSE

To determine if a quality improvement (QI) initiative could enhance multidisciplinary management of acute malignant extradural spinal cord compression (ESCC) at our institution.

METHODS

The medical records of all 40 patients who received palliative radiotherapy for malignant ESCC from 2015 to 2017 were reviewed to determine the time course of key National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-supported workup and management steps. On the basis of the findings, a multidisciplinary group of physician stakeholders developed a clinical pathway to facilitate expedited care. The efficacy of this clinical pathway and the educational content provided to all relevant departments were then evaluated by comparing outcomes with data from a similarly reviewed follow-up cohort of 25 patients from 2018 to 2019.

RESULTS

Patients treated for malignant ESCC after our QI intervention were more likely to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the entire spine (64% v 44%; P = .013) and have a radiation oncology (RO) consultation before surgery (100% v 27%; P = .002). Median time from MRI to RO consultation decreased from 3 to 1 days (P = .03). On subgroup analysis, initial trends toward delays in RO consultation for patients planning for surgery (median, 3 days) or for lack of prior cancer diagnosis (median, 4 days) were reduced to delays of 0 and 1 day, respectively, after the QI intervention. No significant differences were observed in time to surgical consultation or surgery itself.

CONCLUSION

This QI study was able to stimulate better use of diagnostic imaging and earlier involvement of RO in multidisciplinary decision making, suggesting an effective approach to improving multidisciplinary care in other scenarios as well.

The Incidence and Management Trends of Metastatic Spinal Tumors in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-based Study

STUDY DESIGN

Population-based study. From 2008 to 2017, data from the national database of the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service were analyzed. The national insurance system and all medical expense bill data of the entire population are included in the database.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence and management trends of metastatic spinal tumors in South Korea.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The spine is the most common location of bone metastases. However, population-based studies in this topic are limited.

METHODS

The International Classification of Disease, 10th revision, medical behavior, and examination codes were used to identify the incidence and management trends of metastatic spinal tumors. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 38,007 patients (average age, 61 years) diagnosed with metastatic spinal tumors were analyzed. Metastatic tumors were most common in patients in their 60s (25.7%). The 10-year incidence of spinal metastases in South Korea was 6.68 cases per 100,000 population. The age-adjusted incidence per 100,000 population decreased from 8.16 cases in 2008 to 6.18 in 2017 (P = 0.03). Sex-adjusted incidence rates in men increased from 8.60 per 100,000 persons in 2008 to 8.70 in 2017 (P < 0.001); those of women decreased from 8.20 per 100,000 persons in 2008 to 4.15 in 2017 (P < 0.05). The most common primary tumor site was the lung (26.9%), followed by the breast (16.9%), prostate (10.8%), and liver (8.1%). Radiation therapy was constant at about 3500 cases per annum (P = 0.62); surgical treatment increased from 1158 to 1382 cases (P < 0.001). Resection and instrumentation surgeries increased significantly (P < 0.001), whereas cementation decreased continuously. Total healthcare costs increased significantly from $19,925,296 in 2008 to $30,268,217 in 2017 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of metastatic spinal tumors decreased in South Korea. Resection and instrumentation procedures increased, and total healthcare costs increased rapidly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

How good are the outcomes of instrumented debulking operations for symptomatic spinal metastases and how long do they stand? A subgroup analysis in the global spine tumor study group database

BACKGROUND

The benefits of surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have been demonstrated, largely based on series of patients undergoing debulking and instrumentation operations. However, as cancer treatments improve and overall survival lengths increase, the incidence of recurrent spinal cord compression after debulking may increase. The aim of the current paper is to document the postoperative evolution of neurological function, pain, and quality of life following debulking and instrumentation in the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) database.

METHODS

The GSTSG database is a prospective multicenter data repository of consecutive patients that underwent surgery for a symptomatic spinal metastasis. For the present analysis, patients were selected from the database that underwent decompressive debulking surgery with instrumentation. Preoperative tumor type, Tomita and Tokuhashi scores, EQ-5D, Frankel, Karnofsky, and postoperative complications, survival, EQ-5D, Frankel, Karnofsky, and pain numeric rating scores (NRS) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 914 patients underwent decompressive debulking surgery with instrumentation and had documented follow-up until death or until 2 years post surgery. Median preoperative Karnofsky performance index was 70. A total of 656 patients (71.8%) had visceral metastases and 490 (53.6%) had extraspinal bone metastases. Tomita scores were evenly distributed above (49.1%) and below or equal to 5 (50.9%), and Tokuhashi scores almost evenly distributed below or equal to 8 (46.3%) and above 8 (53.7%). Overall, 12-month survival after surgery was 56.3%. The surgery resulted in EQ-5D health status improvement and NRS pain reduction that was maintained throughout follow-up. Frankel scores improved at first follow-up in 25.0% of patients, but by 12 months neurological deterioration was observed in 18.8%.

CONCLUSION

We found that palliative debulking and instrumentation surgeries were performed throughout all Tomita and Tokuhashi categories. These surgeries reduced pain scores and improved quality of life up to 2 years after surgery. After initial improvement, a proportion of patients experienced neurological deterioration by 1 year, but the majority of patients remained stable.

Visceral Metastasis: A Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases

Objective

To characterize the visceral metastasis as a predictive tool for the survival of patients with spinal metastases through an exploratory meta‐analysis.

Methods

Two investigators independently searched PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies from 2000–2016. The effect estimates for the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled with a random‐ or fixed‐effect model.

Results

In total, 18 eligible studies were retrieved with 5468 participants from nine countries. The overall pooled effect size for HR and RR was 1.50 and 3.79, respectively, which was proved to be statistically significant. In the subgroup of prostate cancer (PCa) and non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), statistical significance and marginal statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.35–2.29) and (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.99–2.48), respectively. However, in the subgroup of thyroid cancer, breast cancer, and renal cancer, statistical significance was not achieved (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.75–1.83, Z = 0.70, P = 0.486). The results did not show any evidence of publication bias.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that visceral metastasis was a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases as a whole. Interestingly, the onset of visceral metastases differentially impacted the survival in different primary tumors. Therefore, the prognostic value of visceral metastasis might be related to the type of primary tumor.

Orthopaedic vs. Neurosurgery - Does a surgeon's specialty have an influence on 90-day complications following surgical intervention of spinal metastases?

OBJECTIVES

Spinal metastases are routinely managed and/or operated on by both orthopaedic surgeons and neurological surgeons. However, controversy still exists as to whether the operating surgeon's specialty has an impact on post-operative complication rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The 2007-2017 Humana Administrative Claims database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients undergoing fusions, laminectomies or osteotomy/corpectomy for spinal metastases. Physician taxonomy codes were used to identify the operating surgeon's specialty (orthopaedic vs. neurosurgery). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess difference in 90-day complications, readmissions and mortality between the two specialties while controlling for age, gender, race, co-morbidity burden, procedural characteristics (fusion, laminectomy and/or osteotomy/corpectomy) and type of primary cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 887 patients undergoing surgical intervention for spinal metastases were included - out of which 204 (23.0 %) patients were operated on by orthopaedic surgeons and 683 (77.0 %) by neurosurgeons. Following adjustment for difference in patient demographics and baseline clinical characteristics, no statistically significant differences were noted between the two specialties with regards to wound complications (p = 0.992), pulmonary complications (p = 0.461), cardiac complications (p = 0.631), thrombotic complications (p = 0.177), sepsis (p = 0.463), pneumonia (p = 0.767), urinary tract infection (p = 0.916), acute renal failure (p = 0.934), hardware complications (p = 0.892), emergency department visits (p = 0.934), 90-day readmissions (p = 0.277) and 90-day mortality (p = 0.786).

CONCLUSIONS

Based off our findings, it appears that a surgeon's specialty has no influence on intermediate-term complications following surgical intervention for spinal metastases. The findings of the study should support the need for maintaining access of patients to both specialties for appropriate surgical consultation.

Surgical or Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Cervical Spine Metastases: Results From the Epidemiology, Process, and Outcomes of Spine Oncology (EPOSO) Cohort

STUDY DESIGN

Ambispective cohort study design.

OBJECTIVES

Cervical spine metastases have distinct clinical considerations. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of surgical intervention (± radiotherapy) or radiotherapy alone on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in patients treated for cervical metastatic spine tumours.

METHODS

Patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy for cervical spine metastases were identified from the Epidemiology, Process, and Outcomes of Spine Oncology (EPOSO) international multicentre prospective observational study. Demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and HRQOL (numerical rating scale [NRS] pain, EQ-5D (3L), SF-36v2, and SOSGOQ) measures were prospectively collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postintervention.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients treated for cervical metastases were identified: 38 underwent surgery ± radiation and 17 received radiation alone. Surgically treated patients had higher mean spinal instability neoplastic scores compared with the radiation-alone group (13.0 vs 8.0, P < .001) and higher NRS pain scores and lower HRQOL scores compared to the radiation alone group (P < .05). From baseline to 6 months posttreatment, surgically treated patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements in NRS pain, EQ-5D (5L), and SOSGOQ2.0 scores compared with nonsignificant improvements in the radiotherapy alone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgically treated cervical metastases patients presented with higher levels of instability, worse baseline pain and HRQOL scores compared with patients who underwent radiotherapy alone. Significant improvements in pain and HRQOL were noted for those patients who received surgical intervention. Limited or no improvements were found in those treated with radiotherapy alone.

Transpedicular 3D endoscope-assisted thoracic corpectomy for separation surgery in spinal metastases: feasibility of the technique and preliminary results of a promising experience

Surgery for spinal metastases has undergone multiple transformations in terms of surgical technique. The need for a more aggressive surgical strategy for local control of the disease, given the advances in radiosurgery and immunotherapy, has met the incorporation of many different technological adjuncts. Separation surgery has become one of the main targets to achieve for surgeons in the treatment of spinal metastases. In this paper a prospective series of 3D endoscope-assisted transpedicular thoracic corpectomies is described. Adult patients with a diagnosis of single-level thoracic metastases requiring surgery for epidural compression were included. Data recorded for each case concerned patient demographics, surgical technique, clinical, radiological and surgical data, intra- and postoperative complications, follow-up. The goal of this study was to verify the achievement of separation surgery with this technique, while confirming the safety and feasibility of the procedure. A total number of nine patients were treated from January to April 2019 with a 3D endoscope-assisted procedure. A circumferential bilateral decompression was achieved in seven cases, while monolateral in the other two. A proper separation between the tumor and the spinal cord was achieved in all cases as confirmed by imaging. Axial pain always improved after the procedure as well as neurological functions, when compromised before surgery. No intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded. Mean hospital stay was 4 days after surgery with early mobilization. At last follow-up no local recurrences were registered. According to preliminary results, the transpedicular 3D endoscope-assisted approach for corpectomies appeared to be a safe and effective technique to achieve proper circumferential decompression and valid separation surgery in thoracic metastases, potentially decreasing the need for costotransversectomy.

Functional Outcomes of Surgical Management for Spinal Epidural Masses in an Egyptian Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND:

The spinal epidural space, covering the dural sac, is located along the posterior longitudinal ligament anteriorly, the ligamentum flavum and the periosteum of laminae posteriorly, and the pedicles of the spinal column by the intervertebral foramina containing their neural elements laterally. It could be affected variably by different types of diseases, either as primary lesions or as an extension from a disease process in the nearby tissues and organs.

AIM:

We aimed to present clinically and surgically patients with spinal epidural masses operated in the Neurosurgery Department of Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt, along a time interval of one year.

METHODS:

In this prospective cohort study, we analysed motor deficits, sensory deficits, and bowel and bladder dysfunction. We have performed decompressive laminectomy on 19 patients with spinal epidural masses together with mass excision as long as the tumour was accessible, with or without fixation.

RESULTS:

All patients were radiologically assessed by MRI over the affected side of the spine. D10 was the commonest site in our study to be affected in 10 cases of our participants (23%), followed by D5, D7, and D12 each of them was affected in 6 cases (14%), in another word spinal segments by order of frequency to be affected were dorsal followed by lumbar spine. All patients included in this study (100%) showed an obvious improvement as regard pain and tenderness.

CONCLUSION:

Surgical interventions have improved the quality of life for our patients with spinal epidural masses.

Prognostic value of low psoas muscle mass in patients with cervical spine metastasis

Morphometric analyses have shown that the psoas muscle mass is associated with mortality in cancer patients. Because of the low incidence of cervical spine metastasis, few studies have been reported in this population. The present study aimed to identify the prognostic value of a psoas muscle mass in predicting overall survival. We also evaluated factors associated with surgical intervention for cervical spine metastases. We retrospectively evaluated 97 patients (mean age 65.2 years) diagnosed with cervical spine metastases between February 2009 and July 2016. The psoas muscle area was measured at the L3 level on computed tomography at the time nearest the diagnosis of cervical spine metastasis. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to evaluate the relation between overall survival and the psoas muscle's composition. The mean overall survival for patients who underwent surgery was not significantly different from that for those without surgery. Multivariate analyses showed that the lowest percentage quartile (0%-25%) of the psoas muscle mass was associated with poor overall survival after adjusting for age and the prognostic predictive value (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.12-3.32; p = 0.017). Spinal cord compression, spinal instability, palsy, and the poor prognostic predictive value were factors associated with surgical intervention. In conclusion, a psoas muscle mass in the lowest quartile was independently associated with shorter survival among patients with cervical spine metastases. Although the poor prognostic predictive value was associated with surgical treatment, the overall survival was not different between patients who did or did not undergo surgery.

Prognostic models for spinal metastatic disease: evolution of methodologies, limitations, and future opportunities

Advances in cancer biology and therapy have increased survival of metastatic disease patients and, in turn, the rates of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Surgery can improve patient quality of life, but accurate estimation of postoperative survival is critical for appropriate patient selection, multidisciplinary management, and shared decision making. Survival estimation on the basis of clinician judgement alone has been shown to be inaccurate and unreliable. Numerous prognostic scoring systems have been developed to address this need but the inputs to these models, the modeling methodologies, and the model outputs have evolved significantly over time. Here we discuss the available scoring systems, existing limitations, and future opportunities.

Relationship Between Visceral Metastases and Survival in Patients with Metastasis-related Spinal Cord Compression

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether visceral metastases have a significant impact on survival in patients with metastasis-related spinal cord compression (MSCC), and to determine the difference in prognosis between patients with and without visceral metastases.

METHODS

Three institutional databases were searched to identify all patients who had undergone spinal surgery for spinal metastases between March 2002 and June 2010. Data on patient characteristics including pre- and post-operative medical conditions, were collected from medical records or by telephone follow-up. Survival data were obtained either from medical records or by searching a governmental cancer registry.

RESULTS

The mean age of study patients was 59.6 ± 10.5 years (range, 18-84 years), of whom 102 were male and 67 female. The median and mean postoperative survival times were 7.0 ± 0.5 (95% CI 6.0-8.0) months and 12.6 ± 1.2 (95% CI 10.1-15.0) months, respectively, in all patients, being 5.0 ± 0.5 (95% CI 4.0-6.0) months and 10.8 ± 2.4 (95% CI 6.1-15.5) months, respectively, for patients with visceral metastases and 7.0 ± 0.8 (95% CI 5.4-8.6) months and 13.0 ± 1.4 (95%CI 10.3-15.6) months, respectively, for patients without visceral metastases (P = 0.87). These survival times did not differ significantly between groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions showed that visceral metastases had no statistically significant association with survival (P = 0.277), whereas rate of growth of primary tumor (P = 0.003), preoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (P < 0.001), change in KPS (P < 0.001), and Frankel grade (P = 0.091) were independent prognostic factors in the whole cohort (P = 0.005). Changes in KPS (P = 0.001) and major complications (P = 0.003) were significantly associated with survival in patients with visceral metastases, whereas rate of growth of primary tumor (P = 0.016), change in KPS (P = 0.001), and preoperative KPS (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with survival in patients without visceral metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Visceral metastases do not appear to predict the prognosis of patients with MSCC; thus, more aggressive surgery should be considered in patients with MSCC who have visceral metastases. Additionally, prognostic factors differ according to visceral metastases status in these patients.

Prognostic effect of factors involved in revised Tokuhashi score system for patients with spinal metastases: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Background

Cancer patients’ survival time has obviously improved, with the development of systemic treatment techniques. However, the probability of metastases to the vertebrae has also been increased which makes some adverse effects on patients’ quality of life. The prediction of survival plays a key role in choosing therapeutic modality, and Tokuhashi Score was established as one of the most commonly used predictive systems for spinal metastases. Thus, this study was conducted to identify the prognostic effect of factors involved in revised Tokuhashi Score (RTS).

Methods

Two investigators independently retrieved relevant literature on platforms of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We identified eligible studies through title/abstract and full-text perusing. Data was extracted including general information of studies, participants’ characteristics, therapeutic modality, overall survival and prognostic effect of factors. Hazard ratio (HR) for each factor was synthesized if available through fixed- or random-effect models as appropriate.

Results

A total of 63 eligible studies with 10,411 participants were identified. Overall, cases with thyroid cancer had the highest survival rate, while the ones with non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma lived for the shorted survival time. Performance status, bone metastasis, number of involved vertebrae, visceral metastasis, primary tumor and neurological status were regarded as significant predictors in 71.4, 40.0, 18.2, 63.4, 73.1 and 44.7% of the involved studies respectively. Thirty-eight articles were included in meta-analysis, and prognostic effects of five factors (apart from primary tumor) were analyzed. Factors were all proved to be significant except comparisons between KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) 10–40 VS. 50–70 and single VS. multiple spinal metastases.

Conclusion

All factors of RTS were significant on prognosis predicting and should be considered when choosing therapeutic modality for spinal metastases. What’s more, we believe that more accurate prognosis may be obtained after removal of the cut-offs for KPS 10–40 VS. 50–70 and single VS. multiple involved vertebrae.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5139-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Decompression and Instrumentation without Fusion for Spinal Metastases: Loosening Rate and Consequences

Background/Purpose

For patients with spinal metastases, decompression surgery was usually followed by instrumentation without fusion. Over time, mechanical stress would lead to loosening of implants. Yet, there is a lack of studies concerning the loosening rate, or the impact on patients when the implants are loosened. We aim at finding the postoperative loosening rate of implant, postoperative survivorship of patients, as well as their correlation with the mode of instrumentation.

Methods

A retrospective study including patients with metastatic spinal cord compression, who received decompression and instrumentation without fusion in a local hospital in Hong Kong from 2007 to 2014 was carried out. Patients with primary spinal tumour or prior spinal fusion were excluded. Demographics, tumour characteristics, mode of instrumentation, loosening rate of implants, as well as survivorship of patients were retrieved. Radiographs at 1 year postoperation were counter-examined by 2 Orthopaedic specialists on the Electronic Patient Record System.

Results

Total of 65 operations were retrieved. The age ranged from 27 to 84 years old. The most frequent primary source of malignancy was lung (26.5%), followed by breast (24.62%). Thoracic level (60%) was the most frequent site of spinal metastases. The survivorship at 1 year postoperation was 61.54%. The overall loosening rate of implants was 44.44%, with the Luque rods and sublaminar wire system being the most (70%). None of the cases required revision or removal of implants at 1 year postoperation.

Conclusion

The loosening rate of implants was high, and it is expected to grow even higher as oncological patients continue to improve in their survivorship with the medical advances such as target therapy. Yet there is still no definite evidence on how the implant loosening would affect patients’ quality of life and clinical performance.

Is Ambulatory Status a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases? An Exploratory Meta-analysis

This study was conducted to identify the influence of ambulatory status prior to treatment on survival of patients with spinal metastases. Two investigators independently retrieved relevant electronic literature in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, to identify eligible studies. Effect estimates for hazard risk (HR) were extracted and synthesized through fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. A total of 17 eligible studies were identified, with an accumulated number of 3962 participants. HR from 14 studies regarding comparison between ambulatory versus non-ambulatory groups were pooled using a random-effects model, and statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.34). In subgroups of mixed primary tumor and lung cancer, ambulatory status was considered to be a significant prognostic factor (P < 0.05), while in the subgroup of prostate cancer it was not (HR = 1.72; 95% CI, 0.79-3.74). HR from 4 studies related to comparison between Frankel E versus Frankel C-D were pooled using a fixed-effects model, which revealed statistical significance (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27-2.36). Ambulatory status is a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases. However, in patients with primary prostate cancer, the prognostic effect of ambulatory status has not yet been confirmed to be significant.

The Impact of Surgical Treatment on Survival in Patients With Cervical Spine Metastases

Objective

To compare overall survival (OS) in patients with cervical spine metastases between initial radiotherapy followed by surgery and initial surgery followed by radiotherapy.

Methods

The medical records of 36 patients with cervical spine metastases from January 2007 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included patients who underwent initial radiotherapy followed by surgery, while group 2 included patients who underwent initial surgery followed by radiotherapy. Clinical outcomes, OS, OS after cervical spine metastasis, and OS after surgery were analyzed in both groups. We evaluated whether primary tumor type, initial treatment modality, the modified Tomita score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Karnofsky performance status, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Nurick grade, Frankel classification, and preoperative symptoms were associated with OS after cervical spine metastasis.

Results

Both groups exhibited improvement in the postoperative visual analogue scale, but only group 2 showed a significant improvement in postoperative JOA score (p=0.03). OS did not differ significantly between groups. However, OS after cervical spine metastasis was only 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–9.3) in group 1 versus 15.8 months (95% CI, 8.8–24.0) in group 2, which represented a significant difference (p<0.05). Factors related to OS after cervical spine metastasis were primary tumor type, initial treatment modality, and preoperative symptoms (p<0.05). Patients who presented with only preoperative pain had approximately 3 fold longer OS after cervical spine metastasis than patients with preoperative motor weakness, even in group 2 (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Surgical treatment prior to the onset of motor weakness or radiotherapy may be a good decision in case of cervical spine metastasis.

Metastatic Spine Tumor Epidemiology: Comparison of Trends in Surgery Across Two Decades and Three Continents

BACKGROUND

Indications for surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have become better defined in recent years, and suitable outcome measures have been established against a changing backdrop of patient characteristics, tumor behavior, and oncologic treatments. Nonetheless, variations still exist in the local management of patients with spinal metastases. In this study, we aimed to review global trends and habits in the surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases, and to examine how these have changed over the last 25 years.

METHODS

In this cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases, data were collected using a secure Internet database from 22 centers across 3 continents. All patients were invited to participate in the study, except those unable or unwilling to give consent.

RESULTS

There was a higher incidence of colonic, liver, and lung carcinoma metastases in Asian countries, and more frequent presentation of breast, prostate, melanoma metastases in the West. Trends in surgical technique were broadly similar across the centers. Overall survival rates after surgery were 53% at 1 year, 31% at 2 years, and 10% at 5 years after surgery (standard error 0.013 for all). Survival improved over successive time periods, with longer survival in patients who underwent surgery in 2011-2016 compared with those who underwent surgery in earlier time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical habits have been fairly consistent among countries worldwide and over time. However, patient survival has improved in later years, perhaps due to medical advances in the treatment of cancer, improved patient selection, and operating earlier in the course of disease.

Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence

One of the major determinants of surgical candidacy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases is the ability of the patient to tolerate the procedure-associated morbidity. In other pathologies, minimally invasive (MIS) procedures have been suggested to have lower intra-operative morbidity while providing similar outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed library searching for articles that directly compared the operative and post-operative outcomes of patients treated for symptomatic spinal metastases. Inclusion criteria were articles reporting two or more cases of patients >18 years old treated with MIS or open approaches for spinal metastases. Studies reporting results in spinal metastases patients that could not be disentangled from other pathologies were excluded. Our search returned 1,568 articles, of which 9 articles met the criteria for inclusion. All articles were level III evidence. Patients treated with MIS approaches tended to have lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative times, shorter inpatient stays, and fewer complications relative to patients undergoing surgeries with conventional approaches. Patients in the MIS and open groups had similar pain improvement, neurological improvement, and functional outcomes. Recent advances in MIS techniques may reduce surgical morbidity while providing similar symptomatic improvement in patients treated for spinal metastases. As a result, MIS techniques may expand the pool of patients with spinal metastases who are candidates for operative management.

State of the Art Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Disease

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past decade. Incorporating stereotactic radiosurgery into these paradigms has been particularly transformative, offering precise delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of adjacent tissues. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional radiation. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive, techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care, improving both local control and patient survivals. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists, and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases, integrating these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which integrates the 4 sentinel decision points in metastatic spine tumors: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical stability, and Systemic disease and medical co-morbidities.

Classification and scoring systems for metastatic spine tumors: a literature review

Introduction

Accurate evaluation of metastasis and life prognosis is essential for selecting a suitable therapeutic strategy for metastatic spine tumors owing to limitations in treatment options. For this purpose, various classification, evaluation, and scoring systems have been developed.

Methods

Classification, evaluation, and scoring systems for metastatic spine tumors reported to date were identified by performing a literature search on PubMed. We reviewed the most cited classifications and scorings before 2009, and all classifications and scorings reported after 2010 from the search results.

Results

Six classifications and 23 scorings were reviewed. The classification/evaluation methods are divided into 1) anatomical classification/evaluation methods, 2) evaluation methods for neurological symptoms/instability, and 3) scoring systems for predicting life expectancy. The first 2 were useful for the planning and evaluation of surgical indications. Scoring systems for life prognosis also permitted rough prediction of the outcomes and were useful for the selection of a suitable treatment. However, variation of the patient background, diversity of adopted prognostic factors, and the absence of scoring systems that could predict the outcome with an accuracy of 90% or higher introduced some limitations.

Conclusion

The identified classification, evaluation, and scoring systems have been generally useful for treatment strategies. However, we emphasize the necessity of multidisciplinary development and revision of classification and evaluation methods to adapt to the prolongation of survival associated with increased diversity and improvement of treatment options.

Spinal Metastasis of Unknown Primary Accompanied by Neurologic Deficit or Vertebral Instability

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Spinal bone metastases are common. They are mostly localized to the lumbar, thoracic, and cervical spine. The most common primaries to result in spinal metastases include lung, breast, and prostate carcinomas in adults as opposed to leukemia, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and neuroblastoma in children. In patients diagnosed with cancer, bone metastases are found in 40% and spinal metastases in 10%. In this study, we reviewed 25 patients diagnosed with a spinal metastasis of unknown primary who presented with low back pain or acute-onset neurologic deficits and underwent operative treatment.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 25 patients with a spinal metastasis of unknown primary who presented to our clinic with acute-onset vertebral fracture or neurologic deficit. Statistical descriptions were obtained for each patient. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The 25 patients included 17 men (68%) and 8 women (32%), with a mean age of 55 years (range, 14-81 years). Eleven patients (44%) presented with varying degrees of motor deficits ranging from flaccid paralysis to paraplegia. Motor deficits were completely reversed in 4 patients postoperatively. The tumors were localized to the upper thoracic spine (T1-4) in 2 patients, in the midthoracic spine (T5-8) in 2 patients, in the lower thoracic spine (T9-12) in 8 patients, in the cervical 7 in 1 patient, and in the lumbar spine in 12 patients. In 10 patients, the tumor affected multiple spinal regions. Nonosseous tumors were not present in 10 patients. Ten patients had an extradural tumor. Costal involvement was detected in 2 patients. The tumors were pathologically identified as lung cancer (n = 3), lymphoma (n = 5), breast cancer (n = 3), gastric cancer (n = 2), liver cancer (n = 2), prostate cancer (n = 2), renal cell carcinoma (n = 2), malignant melanoma (n = 1), plasmacytoma (n = 1), bladder cancer (n = 1), paraganglioma (n = 1), Ewing sarcoma (n = 1), and yolk sac carcinoma (n = 1). Posterior instrumentation was performed in patients with instability. In addition, decompression was performed in patients with neurologic deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that 10% of patients with cancer are diagnosed by vertebral metastasis, presence of malignancy should be suspected and a detailed examination should be performed in patients presenting with vertebral fractures caused by no or minor trauma. Moreover, in patients presenting with neurologic deficit, soft tissue metastases leading to spinal cord compression should be kept in mind and further examinations should be promptly administered.

Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine for Treatment of Spinal Metastases Into a Decision Framework: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanicals Stability, and Systemic Disease

Patients with cancer are frequently affected by spinal metastases. Treatment is palliative, with the principle goals of pain relief, preservation of neurologic function, and improvement in quality of life. In the past decade, we have witnessed a dramatic change in the treatment paradigms due to the development of improved surgical strategies and systemic and radiation therapy. The most important change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS), allowing delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk. High-dose SSRS provides durable tumor control when used either as definitive therapy or as a postoperative adjuvant therapy. Integration of SSRS has fundamentally changed the indications for and type of surgery performed for metastatic spine tumors. Although the role for surgical intervention is well established, a clear trend toward less-aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques has been observed. Targeted therapies are also rapidly changing the way cancer is being treated and have demonstrated improved survival for a number of malignancies. As these treatment decisions become more complex, a multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, interventionalists, and pain specialists is required. In this article, the current evidence affecting the treatment of spinal metastases is integrated into a decision framework that considers four principal assessments of a patient's spine disease: NOMS (neurologic, oncologic, mechanical instability, and systemic disease).

Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies

Purpose

While several clinical prediction rules (CPRs) of survival exist for patients with symptomatic spinal metastasis (SSM), these have variable prognostic ability and there is no recognized CPR for health related quality of life (HRQoL). We undertook a critical appraisal of the literature to identify key preoperative prognostic factors of clinical outcomes in patients with SSM who were treated surgically. The results of this study could be used to modify existing or develop new CPRs.

Methods

Seven electronic databases were searched (1990–2015), without language restriction, to identify studies that performed multivariate analysis of preoperative predictors of survival, neurological, functional and HRQoL outcomes in surgical patients with SSM. Individual studies were assessed for class of evidence. The strength of the overall body of evidence was evaluated using GRADE for each predictor.

Results

Among 4,818 unique citations, 17 were included; all were in English, rated Class III and focused on survival, revealing a total of 46 predictors. The strength of the overall body of evidence was very low for 39 and low for 7 predictors. Due to considerable heterogeneity in patient samples and prognostic factors investigated as well as several methodological issues, our results had a moderately high risk of bias and were difficult to interpret.

Conclusions

The quality of evidence for predictors of survival was, at best, low. We failed to identify studies that evaluated preoperative prognostic factors for neurological, functional, or HRQoL outcomes in surgical patients with SSM. We formulated methodological recommendations for prognostic studies to promote acquiring high-quality evidence to better estimate predictor effect sizes to improve patient education, surgical decision-making and development of CPRs.

Surgical management of spinal fractures and neurological involvement in patients with myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Myeloma (MM) typically involves the spine and causes bone pain, pathological fractures and spinal cord compression with possible consequent neurological deficits. This retrospective study reports the results of surgery on a selected population of patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic spinal myeloma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 26 patients who underwent surgery for spinal myeloma with neurological involvement were studied retrospectively. Neurological evaluation was performed according to the Frankel grade. Characteristics of this population, reconstructive techniques and surgery-related complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

The tumours involved the thoracic spine in 13 patients, the lumbar spine in 10 patients, and the cervical spine in three patients. The most common approach was a posterior-only approach (70%), followed by a staged, combined approach (20%), and an anterior-only approach (10%). The mean postoperative survival time was 43 months (range: 8-60 months). A significant improvement in neurological function was observed in the study population after surgery (p=0.001). There were seven early postoperative complications, two late complications and five surgery-related complications.

DISCUSSION

Surgery in selected patients affected by spinal myeloma with neurological involvement is associated with good clinical outcomes and neurological recovery and an acceptable rate of complications. Neurological deficit and segmental instability can be treated sufficiently in most cases by the implementation of a posterior-only approach; however, the final treatment should, when possible, include adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and rigorous bracing.

Posterior approaches for symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression

Surgical interventions for spinal metastasis are commonly performed for mechanical stabilization, pain relief, preservation of neurological function, and local tumor reduction. Although multiple surgical approaches can be used for the treatment of metastatic spinal lesions, posterior approaches are commonly performed. In this study, the role of posterior surgical procedures in the treatment of spinal metastases was reviewed, including posterior laminectomy with and without instrumentation for stabilization, transpedicular corpectomy, and costotransversectomy. A review of the literature from 1980 to 2015 was performed using Medline, as was a review of the bibliographies of articles meeting preset inclusion criteria, to identify studies on the role of these posterior approaches among adults with spinal metastasis. Thirty-four articles were ultimately analyzed, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 6 prospective cohort studies, and 27 retrospective case reports and/or series. Some of the reviewed articles had Level II evidence indicating that laminectomy with stabilization can be recommended for improvement in neurological outcome and reduction of pain in selected patients. However, the use of laminectomy alone should be carefully considered. Additionally, transpedicular corpectomy and costotransversectomy can be recommended with the expectation of improving neurological outcomes and reducing pain in properly selected patients with spinal metastases. With improvements in the treatment paradigms for patients with spinal metastasis, as well as survival, surgical therapy will continue to play an important role in the management of spinal metastasis. While this review presents a window into determining the utility of posterior approaches, future prospective studies will provide essential data to better define the roles of the various options now available to surgeons in treating spinal metastases.

Preoperative palsy score has no significant association with survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with spinal metastases who undergo spinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Survival is a key factor physicians consider when selecting a treatment modality for the treatment of spinal metastases. Various assessment systems can predict length of survival and facilitate selection of the most appropriate treatment. Spinal palsy is a prognostic parameter in the Tokuhashi scoring system but not in the Tomita scoring system. A limitation of these scoring systems is that studies of them have included different tumor types. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative neurological status as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgical treatment.

METHODS

From November 2000 to March 2010, 50 patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression secondary to non-small-cell lung cancer underwent palliative surgery. Data collected included patient age and sex, tumor histology, date of surgery, death or last follow-up, preoperative and postoperative ambulatory status according to the Frankel grading system, body mass index (BMI), number of vertebra involved, number of other bone metastasis, visceral metastasis, and preoperative Karnofsky performance status. Log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to evaluate possible prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 61.6 years (range, 20-87 years), and 34 were male and 16 were female. The median postoperative survival time was 7.5 months. The median survival was 2.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-16.3 months) in the Frankel A + B group and 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.52-9.89 months) in the Frankel C + D group (p = 0.87). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regressions showed that preoperative performance status was significantly associated with survival. Preoperative palsy score had no statistically significant association with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative palsy score had no statistically significant association with survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with spinal metastases who underwent spinal surgery in this study.

Zoledronic Acid may reduce intraoperative bleeding in spinal tumors: a prospective cohort study

Between June 2010 and June 2011, 176 patients were divided into 2 groups: a group with spinal metastasis of solid tumors (n = 157) and a group with multiple myeloma (n = 19). Both groups were further divided into 2 subgroups: a group receiving zoledronic acid before surgery and a control group. The zoledronic acid subgroup of the solid tumors group was group A (n = 81), the control subgroup of the solid tumors group was group B (n = 76), the zoledronic acid subgroup of the multiple myeloma group was group C (n = 10), and the control subgroup of the multiple myeloma group was group D (n = 9). The average intraoperative blood loss during spinal surgery was as follows: 1311 ± 691 mL in group A and 1752 ± 740 mL in group B (P = 0.000) and 1994 ± 810 mL in group C and 3134 ± 795 mL in group D (P = 0.000). Patients receiving zoledronic acid before surgery had significantly less intraoperative bleeding than those who did not receive it. Preoperative use of zoledronic acid can effectively reduce intraoperative bleeding during surgery for the treatment of spinal tumors.