1
|
Álvarez Flores MB, Sopeña Corvinos M, Guillén Santos R, Cava Valenciano F. High-Sensitivity Flow Cytometry for the Reliable Detection of Measurable Residual Disease in Hematological Malignancies in Clinical Laboratories. Diseases 2024; 12:338. [PMID: 39727668 PMCID: PMC11727296 DOI: 10.3390/diseases12120338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2024] [Revised: 11/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) requires highly sensitive flow cytometry protocols to provide an accurate prediction of shorter progression-free survival. High assay sensitivity generally requires rapid processing to avoid cell loss from small bone marrow sample volumes, but this requirement conflicts with the need in most clinical cytometry laboratories for long processing and acquisition times, especially when multiple MRD studies coincide on the same day. METHODS The proposed protocol was applied to 226 human bone marrow and 45 peripheral blood samples submitted for the study of MRD or the detection of rare cells. Samples were processed within 24 h of extraction and acquired with an eight-color flow cytometer. RESULTS The FACSLyse-Bulk protocol allows for the labelling of millions of cells in under 90 min in small sample volumes without affecting the FSC/SSC pattern or antigen expression, and it also allows antigens to be fixed to the membrane, thus avoiding the capping phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS The proposed protocol would allow clinical flow cytometry laboratories to perform MRD studies in house and easily achieve a limit of detection and limit of quantification <0.001%, thus avoiding the need to outsource analysis to specialized cytometry laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - María Sopeña Corvinos
- URSalud Laboratory, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, 28702 Madrid, Spain; (M.S.C.); (R.G.S.); (F.C.V.)
| | - Raquel Guillén Santos
- URSalud Laboratory, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, 28702 Madrid, Spain; (M.S.C.); (R.G.S.); (F.C.V.)
| | - Fernando Cava Valenciano
- URSalud Laboratory, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, 28702 Madrid, Spain; (M.S.C.); (R.G.S.); (F.C.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moghawry HM, Rashed ME, Gomaa K, AbdelGhani S, Dishisha T. Development of a fast and precise potency test for BCG vaccine viability using flow cytometry compared to MTT and colony-forming unit assays. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11606. [PMID: 37464014 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38657-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
In a precarious world of rapidly growing pandemics, the field of vaccine production has witnessed considerable growth. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a live-attenuated vaccine and a part of the immunization program in 157 countries. The quality control is based on a potency test through viable cell enumeration. The colony-forming unit (CFU) assay is the official method, however, it often yields fluctuating results, suffers from medium cracking, and requires lengthy analysis (~ 28 days). Flow cytometric analysis was proposed earlier, but it was coupled with a Coulter counter for measuring the entire bacterial population (live/dead). In the present study, thiazole orange/propidium iodide dyes supplemented with fluorogenic reference beads were employed for viable counting, eliminating the need for a Coulter counter. Both the flow cytometry and the colorimetric technique employing tetrazolium salt were validated and compared to the CFU assay. The colorimetric assay displayed high precision, accuracy, and a strong positive correlation with the CFU assay. The flow cytometry assay demonstrated high precision and a notable ability to distinguish different forms of BCG cells (live, injured, and dead). It also exhibited a perfect positive correlation with the CFU assay. Both methods reduced the analysis time by > 26 days and eliminated the need for human intervention by automating the test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hend M Moghawry
- Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 625 11, Egypt
- General Administration of Biological Products, Central Administration of Biological and Innovative Products and Clinical Trials, Egyptian Drug Authority (EDA), Giza, Egypt
| | - Mohamed E Rashed
- General Administration of Biological Products, Central Administration of Biological and Innovative Products and Clinical Trials, Egyptian Drug Authority (EDA), Giza, Egypt
| | - Kareeman Gomaa
- Clinical and Chemical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine - Kasr Al-Ainy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sameh AbdelGhani
- Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 625 11, Egypt
- Department of Pharmacy, Jewish Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 402 02, USA
| | - Tarek Dishisha
- Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 625 11, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sarmiento Palao H, Tarín F, Martirena F, Barragán E, Such E, Sempere A, Tasso M, Manresa P, López F. A reproducible strategy for analysis of minimal residual disease measured by Standardized multiparametric flow cytometry in b acute lymphoblastic leukemia. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2018; 96:12-15. [PMID: 30353651 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabián Tarín
- Department of Hematology, Hospital General Universitari d'Alacant
| | | | - Eva Barragán
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia
| | - Esperanza Such
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia
| | - Amparo Sempere
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia
| | - Maria Tasso
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital General Universitari d'Alacant
| | - Pablo Manresa
- Department of Hematology, Hospital General Universitari d'Alacant
| | - Francisco López
- Department of Hematology, Hospital General Universitari d'Alacant
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Differential effects of lenalidomide during plasma cell differentiation. Oncotarget 2018; 7:28096-111. [PMID: 27057635 PMCID: PMC5053712 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide have greatly improved the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma. However, their effects on plasma cells, the healthy counterpart of myeloma cells, are unknown. Here, we investigated lenalidomide effects on normal human plasma cell generation using an in vitro model. Lenalidomide inhibited the generation of pre-plasmablasts and early plasma cells, while it moderately affected plasmablast production. It also reduced the expression level of Ikaros, Aiolos, and IRF4 transcription factors, in plasmablasts and early plasma cells. This suggests that their differential sensitivity to lenalidomide is not due to a difference in Ikaros or Aiolos degradation. Lenalidomide also inhibited long-lived plasma cell generation, but did not impair their long-term survival once generated. This last observation is in agreement with the finding that lenalidomide treatment for 3-18 months did not affect the bone marrow healthy plasma cell count in allografted patients with multiple myeloma. Our findings should prompt to investigate whether lenalidomide resistance in patients with multiple myeloma could be associated with the emergence of malignant plasmablasts or long-lived plasma cells that are less sensitive to lenalidomide.
Collapse
|
5
|
Burnusuzov HA, Spasova MI, Murdjeva MA, Stoyanova AA, Mumdziev IN, Kaleva VI, Belcheva MI, Bosheva MN. Immunophenotypic Modulation of the Blast Cells in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Minimal Residual Disease Detection. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2017; 58:28-35. [PMID: 27383875 DOI: 10.1515/folmed-2016-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Early clearance of leukemic cells during induction therapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a basis for treatment optimization. Currently, the most widely used methods for the detection of minute residual malignant cells in the bone marrow and/or peripheral blood, minimal residual disease (MRD), are PCR and flow cytometry (FCM). Immunophenotypic modulation (IM) is a well known factor that can hamper the accurate FCM analysis. AIM To report the IM detected by 8-color FCM during the BFM-type remission induction in 24 consecutive MRD-positive samples of children with B-cell precursor ALL and the possible implications for MRD detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2010 and 2012 we prospectively followed up the MRD on days 15 and 33 of induction treatment in bone marrow (BM) samples and on day 8 in peripheral blood (PB). The IM was assessed by comparative analyses of the changes in the mean fluorescence intensity of 7 highly relevant antigens expressed by the leukemic cells and normal B-lymphocytes. RESULTS IM occurred, to different extents, in all analyzed day 15 BM and in most day 33 BM samples. Statistically significant changes in the MFI-levels of four CDs expressed by the leukemic blasts were observed: downmodulation of CD10, CD19 and CD34 and upmodulation of CD20. No changes in the expression of CD38, CD58 and CD45 were noticed. CONCLUSIONS Measuring the MRD by standardized 8-color flow cytometry helps improve the monitoring of the disease, leading to better therapeutic results. However, the IM of the different antigens expressed by the leukemic blasts should be taken into consideration and cautiously analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan A Burnusuzov
- Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Mariya I Spasova
- Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Mariana A Murdjeva
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Angelina A Stoyanova
- Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Ivan N Mumdziev
- Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Valeriya I Kaleva
- Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Milena I Belcheva
- Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Miroslava N Bosheva
- Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delgado JA, Guillén-Grima F, Moreno C, Panizo C, Pérez-Robles C, Mata JJ, Moreno L, Arana P, Chocarro S, Merino J. A simple flow-cytometry method to evaluate peripheral blood contamination of bone marrow aspirates. J Immunol Methods 2016; 442:54-58. [PMID: 28041941 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Revised: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Bone marrow (BM) aspirates used for flow-cytometry (FCM) studies are usually obtained from a second aspiration, as the primary aspirate is used for morphological assessment. For this reason, the FCM samples unavoidably contain some blood; although, good-quality samples contain only a small amount. It is of utmost importance to assess the quality of samples prior to FCM analysis; yet, contamination with peripheral blood (PB) is not evaluated in most laboratories, possibly because the methods available are either qualitative or too complex for daily practice. Here, we propose a simple FCM method to quantitatively evaluate PB contamination in BM aspirates, by analyzing the percentage of plasma cells and CD34+ cells - two cell populations nearly absent from PB - and CD10+ granulocytes, which comprise the majority of the PB granulocyte population. We analyzed these three populations in 122 BM aspirates from subjects without hematological disease, and identified samples with PB contamination by performing a hierarchical cluster analysis. A discriminant analysis yielded a function, which we named the PB contamination index (PBCI). This index value gives a quantitative indication about the degree of hemodilution of a given sample. A threshold was identified that discriminates low-quality samples. The method and the threshold proved to be useful in BM aspirates infiltrated with malignant cells, with the exception of cases where hematological disease altered two of the three parameters included in the index. We have easily implemented the PBCI calculation in our daily routine, and find it very helpful for an accurate interpretation of FCM results in a large proportion of BM specimens. Limitations of the technique are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Antonio Delgado
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Francisco Guillén-Grima
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Cristina Moreno
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Carlos Panizo
- Department of Hematology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Carmen Pérez-Robles
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Juan José Mata
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Laura Moreno
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Paula Arana
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Silvia Chocarro
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain
| | - Juana Merino
- Department of Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Flores-Montero J, de Tute R, Paiva B, Perez JJ, Böttcher S, Wind H, Sanoja L, Puig N, Lecrevisse Q, Vidriales MB, van Dongen JJM, Orfao A. Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2015; 90:61-72. [PMID: 26100534 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Revised: 05/25/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, several studies on large series of multiple myeloma (MM) patients have demonstrated the clinical utility of flow cytometry monitoring of minimal residual disease (flow-MRD) in bone marrow (BM), for improved assessment of response to therapy and prognostication. However, disturbing levels of variability exist regarding the specific protocols and antibody panels used in individual laboratories. Overall, consensus exists about the utility of combined assessment of CD38 and CD138 for the identification of BM plasma cells (PC); in contrast, more heterogeneous lists of markers are used to further distinguish between normal/reactive PCs and myeloma PCs in the MRD settings. Among the later markers, CD19, CD45, CD27, and CD81, together with CD56, CD117, CD200, and CD307, have emerged as particularly informative; however, no single marker provides enough specificity for clear discrimination between clonal PCs and normal PCs. Accordingly, multivariate analyses of single PCs from large series of normal/reactive vs. myeloma BM samples have shown that combined assessment of CD138 and CD38, together with CD45, CD19, CD56, CD27, CD81, and CD117 would be ideally suited for MRD monitoring in virtually every MM patient. However, the specific antibody clones, fluorochrome conjugates and sources of the individual markers determines its optimal (vs. suboptimal or poor) performance in an eight-color staining. Assessment of clonality, via additional cytoplasmic immunoglobulin (CyIg) κ vs. CyIgλ evaluation, may contribute to further establish the normal/reactive vs. clonal nature of small suspicious PC populations at high sensitivity levels, provided that enough cells are evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Flores-Montero
- Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Servicio de Citometría y Departamento de Medicina-NUCLEUS, Universidad de Salamanca (Salamanca), Spain
| | - Ruth de Tute
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigaciones Médicas Aplicadas (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Juan Perez
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Sebastian Böttcher
- Second Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel (UNIKIEL), Kiel, Germany
| | - Henk Wind
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luzalba Sanoja
- Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Servicio de Citometría y Departamento de Medicina-NUCLEUS, Universidad de Salamanca (Salamanca), Spain
| | - Noemí Puig
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Quentin Lecrevisse
- Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Servicio de Citometría y Departamento de Medicina-NUCLEUS, Universidad de Salamanca (Salamanca), Spain
| | - María Belén Vidriales
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jacques J M van Dongen
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, CSIC-USAL), Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Servicio de Citometría y Departamento de Medicina-NUCLEUS, Universidad de Salamanca (Salamanca), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arroz M, Came N, Lin P, Chen W, Yuan C, Lagoo A, Monreal M, de Tute R, Vergilio JA, Rawstron AC, Paiva B. Consensus guidelines on plasma cell myeloma minimal residual disease analysis and reporting. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2015; 90:31-9. [PMID: 25619868 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major heterogeneity between laboratories in flow cytometry (FC) minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in multiple myeloma (MM) must be overcome. Cytometry societies such as the International Clinical Cytometry Society and the European Society for Clinical Cell Analysis recognize a strong need to establish minimally acceptable requirements and recommendations to perform such complex testing. METHODS A group of 11 flow cytometrists currently performing FC testing in MM using different instrumentation, panel designs (≥ 6-color) and analysis software compared the procedures between their respective laboratories and reviewed the literature to propose a consensus guideline on flow-MRD analysis and reporting in MM. RESULTS/CONCLUSION Consensus guidelines support i) the use of minimum of five initial gating parameters (CD38, CD138, CD45, forward, and sideward light scatter) within the same aliquot for accurate identification of the total plasma cell compartment; ii) the analysis of potentially aberrant phenotypic markers and to report the antigen expression pattern on neoplastic plasma cells as being reduced, normal or increased, when compared to a normal reference plasma cell immunophenotype (obtained using the same instrument and parameters); and iii) the percentage of total bone marrow plasma cells plus the percentages of both normal and neoplastic plasma cells within the total bone marrow plasma cell compartment, and over total bone marrow cells. Consensus guidelines on minimal current and future MRD analyses should target a lower limit of detection of 0.001%, and ideally a limit of quantification of 0.001%, which requires at least 3 × 10(6) and 5 × 10(6) bone marrow cells to be measured, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Arroz
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Cytometry Laboratory, CHLO, Hospital S. Francisco Xavier, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Neil Came
- Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Pei Lin
- Department of Hematopathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Weina Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Constance Yuan
- Laboratory of Pathology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anand Lagoo
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Ruth de Tute
- HMDS, Department of Haematology, St. James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jo-Anne Vergilio
- University Of Michigan Medical Center Hematology Oncology Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Andy C Rawstron
- HMDS, Department of Haematology, St. James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Paiva
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Johansson U, Bloxham D, Couzens S, Jesson J, Morilla R, Erber W, Macey M. Guidelines on the use of multicolour flow cytometry in the diagnosis of haematological neoplasms. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol 2014; 165:455-88. [PMID: 24620735 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
10
|
Residual malignant and normal plasma cells shortly after high dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation. Highlight of a putative therapeutic window in Multiple Myeloma? Oncotarget 2013; 3:1335-47. [PMID: 23154454 PMCID: PMC4539173 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignant plasma cell disorder. We have evaluated the counts of Multiple Myeloma Cells (MMCs) and normal plasma cells (N-PCs), seven days after high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem transplantation (ASCT). Two third of patients had detectable minimal residual disease (MRD+) (71.7 MMCs/μL) after induction treatment with dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor. MMC counts were reduced by 92% (P ≤ .05) but not eradicated 7 days after HDM+ASCT. Post-HDM+ASCT MMCs were viable and bathed in a burst of MMC growth factors, linked with post-HDM aplasia. In one third of patients (MRD− patients), MMCs were not detectable after induction treatment and remained undetectable after HDM+ASCT. Major difference between MRD− and MRD+ patients is that N-PC counts were increased 3 fold (P < .05) by HDM+ASCT in MRD− patients, but were unaffected in MRD+ patients. Possible explanation could be that clearance of MMCs in MRD− patients makes more niches available for N-PCs. Thus, MMCs are not fully eradicated shortly after HDM, are bathed in high concentrations of MMC growth factors in an almost desert BM, are viable in short-term culture, which suggests providing additional therapies shortly after HDM to kill resistant MMCs before full repair of lesions.
Collapse
|
11
|
Viral-specific adoptive immunotherapy after allo-SCT: the role of multimer-based selection strategies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48:1265-70. [PMID: 23318538 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2012] [Revised: 11/12/2012] [Accepted: 11/17/2012] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Recipients of hematopoietic SCT undergo a period of profound immunosuppression due to the chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy used for the conditioning and to the graft versus host reaction. SCT patients are highly susceptible to the development of viral infections such as CMV or EBV. The achievement of a competent immunological response, such as viral-specific T cells, is associated with a lower incidence of viral infections. Methods for direct identification of antigen-specific T cells have been based on the functional characteristics of these T cells. Techniques such as proliferation and ELISPOT assays, intracellular cytokine staining and IFN-γ capture have been used to quantitate and obtain viral-specific T cells. Multimers are composed of several MHC molecules loaded with immunodominant peptides joined to a fluorescent molecule, which signal can be quantified by a flow cytometer. Multimer technology together with recent advances in flow cytometry, have facilitated the monitoring and selection of antigen-specific T cells without the need for in vitro cultures and manipulation. This has resulted in a better characterization of the function and phenotype of the different subpopulations of T cells involved in the immune recovery post allogeneic SCT. It is becoming a distinct possibility to isolate individual antigen-specific T cells, without long-term culture techniques, and potentially use them as adoptive immunotherapy in the SCT setting.
Collapse
|
12
|
Paiva B, Martinez-Lopez J, Vidriales MB, Mateos MV, Montalban MA, Fernandez-Redondo E, Alonso L, Oriol A, Teruel AI, de Paz R, Laraña JG, Bengoechea E, Martin A, Mediavilla JD, Palomera L, de Arriba F, Bladé J, Orfao A, Lahuerta JJ, San Miguel JF. Comparison of Immunofixation, Serum Free Light Chain, and Immunophenotyping for Response Evaluation and Prognostication in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:1627-33. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.33.1967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the impact of immunophenotypic response (IR) versus complete response (CR) and CR plus normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio (stringent CR) in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with novel agents. Patients and Methods From a total of 260 elderly patients newly diagnosed with MM included in the GEM05>65y trial, 102 patients achieving at least a partial response with ≥ 70% reduction in M-component after the six planned induction cycles were simultaneously analyzed by immunofixation, sFLC, and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) immunophenotyping; this population is the focus of this study. Results Forty-three percent of patients achieved CR, 30% achieved stringent CR, and 30% achieved IR. Patients in stringent CR showed no significant survival advantage compared with those in CR, whereas patients in IR showed significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) compared with those in stringent CR or CR; this was confirmed by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 4.1; P = .01 for PFS). Discrepancies between the three techniques were relatively common. Notably, in all seven patients achieving IR but remaining immunofixation positive, the M-component disappeared in follow-up analysis. In contrast, MFC-positive patients who were immunofixation negative (n = 20) showed a tendency toward early reappearance of the M-component (median, 3 months). Similarly, in five of 11 stringent CR but MFC-positive patients, symptomatic disease progression was recorded at a median of 13 months after induction. Conclusion Achieving an IR translates into superior PFS and TTP compared with conventional CR or stringent CR. These techniques provide complementary information and thus, an effort should be made to refine response criteria in MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Paiva
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Joaquin Martinez-Lopez
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Maria-Belen Vidriales
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Maria-Victoria Mateos
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Maria-Angeles Montalban
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Elena Fernandez-Redondo
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Lourdes Alonso
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Albert Oriol
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Ana-Isabel Teruel
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Raquel de Paz
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - José-Garcia Laraña
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Enrique Bengoechea
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Alejandro Martin
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Joaquin Diaz Mediavilla
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Luis Palomera
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Felipe de Arriba
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Joan Bladé
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Alberto Orfao
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Juan-Jose Lahuerta
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| | - Jesus F. San Miguel
- From the Hospital Universitario de Salamanca; Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca; Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca; Hospital 12 de Octubre; Hospital Universitario La Paz; Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona; Hospital Clinico de Valencia, Valencia; Hospital de Donostia, San Sebastian Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora; Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza; Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia; and
| |
Collapse
|