1
|
Manier S, Dimopoulos M, Hulin C, Leleu X, Delforge M, Weisel K, Mouro J, Costa B, Sturniolo M, Facon T. Predictors of Lenalidomide Refractory Relapse Timing With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A FIRST Trial Subanalysis. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:e297-e306.e1. [PMID: 37393121 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma (MM) is considered an incurable cancer. Patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) are at risk for relapse within 1 year of frontline therapy. The immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide combined with dexamethasone (Rd) may be used as treatment for NDMM or relapsed MM, including in patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant. PATIENTS This subanalysis of the phase III FIRST trial characterized patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM who experienced relapse while receiving Rd therapy by relapse timing (early [<12 months] versus late [≥12 months]) and type (CRAB vs. non-CRAB). METHODS The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate time-to-event endpoints, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Factors associated with the odds of late relapse were identified by logistic regression with univariate and multivariate analyses using a binary outcome (relapse at <12 vs. ≥12 months) in patient-, disease-, and treatment-specific baseline variables. RESULTS Patients with early refractory relapse had functionally high-risk disease and inferior outcomes. In patients with early relapse versus those with late relapse, median OS (95% CI) was 26.8 months (21.9-32.8) versus 63.9 months (57.0-78.0), median OS from disease progression to death was 19.9 months (16.0-25.5) versus 36.4 months (27.9-47.0), and median PFS from randomization to second progression was 19.1 months (17.3-22.5) versus 42.1 months (37.4-44.9). Lactate dehydrogenase, baseline β2 microglobulin, and myeloma subtype were shown to predict time to relapse. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians could use these factors to consider more aggressive treatment regimens for those at highest risk of early relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salomon Manier
- Department of Hematology, Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
| | - Meletios Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Cyrille Hulin
- Department of Hematology, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Xavier Leleu
- Department of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, CIC U1402 CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Katja Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Department of Pneumonology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jorge Mouro
- Worldwide Medical Affairs, Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland
| | - Bruno Costa
- Worldwide Medical Affairs, Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland
| | - Michael Sturniolo
- Worldwide Medical Affairs, Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ
| | - Thierry Facon
- Department of Hematology, Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Del Fabro V, Di Giorgio MA, Leotta V, Duminuco A, Bellofiore C, Markovic U, Romano A, Bulla A, Curto Pelle A, Elia F, Di Raimondo F, Conticello C. Lenalidomide plus Dexamethasone Combination as First-Line Oral Therapy of Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Unicentric Real-Life Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4036. [PMID: 37627065 PMCID: PMC10452433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Based on the results obtained in clinical trials, the use of the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Len/Dex) has become a potential therapeutic choice for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. This study evaluated 89 frail NDMM patients treated with first-line oral association. At the last follow-up, 34 out of 89 patients (38.2%) were alive, and 22 were still in treatment with Len/Dex. Among 73 evaluable patients who received at least two cycles, the overall response rate was 71% (N = 52). The disease control rate, defined as any level of clinical response to therapy, occurred in 71 patients (97%). We reported one or more adverse events of grade 3 or 4 (G3/4) in 65.2% (N = 58) of patients, with a prevalence of hematological toxicity (24 patients), leading to an overall discontinuation of treatment in two cases. In univariate analysis, high ISS, high serum β2-microglobulin, and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min negatively impact OS, while the depth of response positively impacts OS. Moreover, G3-4 anemia, ISS, frailty score, and ECOG negatively impacts PFS. In conclusion, elderly and more frail patients benefit from the Len/Dex combination also in the era of monoclonal antibodies, ensuring an increased PFS and OS in patients where the therapeutic choice is often limited and usually not very effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Del Fabro
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Mary Ann Di Giorgio
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione Garibaldi, 95122 Catania, Italy; (M.A.D.G.); (V.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Valerio Leotta
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione Garibaldi, 95122 Catania, Italy; (M.A.D.G.); (V.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Andrea Duminuco
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Claudia Bellofiore
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione Garibaldi, 95122 Catania, Italy; (M.A.D.G.); (V.L.); (C.B.)
- Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Uros Markovic
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Alessandra Romano
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico Chirurgiche, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Anna Bulla
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Angelo Curto Pelle
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Federica Elia
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
| | - Francesco Di Raimondo
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Medico Chirurgiche, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Concetta Conticello
- Division of Hematology with BMT, A.O.U. Policlinico “G.Rodolico-San Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy; (U.M.); (A.R.); (A.B.); (A.C.P.); (F.E.); (F.D.R.); (C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dima D, Ullah F, Mazzoni S, Williams L, Faiman B, Kurkowski A, Chaulagain C, Raza S, Samaras C, Valent J, Khouri J, Anwer F. Management of Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Advanced Therapies: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Routine Clinical Practice. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2160. [PMID: 37046821 PMCID: PMC10093129 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Over the past few years, major therapeutic advances have improved progression-free and overall survival, as well as quality of life. Despite this recent progress, MM remains incurable in the vast majority of cases. Patients eventually relapse and become refractory to multiple drug classes, making long-term management challenging. In this review, we will focus on the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in the era of advanced therapies emphasizing the available novel modalities that have recently been incorporated into routine practice, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and other promising approaches. We will also discuss major factors that influence the selection of appropriate drug combinations or cellular therapies, such as relapse characteristics, and other disease and patient related parameters. Our goal is to provide insight into the currently available and experimental therapies for RRMM in an effort to guide the therapeutic decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danai Dima
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Fauzia Ullah
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Sandra Mazzoni
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Louis Williams
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Beth Faiman
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Austin Kurkowski
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Chakra Chaulagain
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Maroone Cancer Center, Weston, FL 33331, USA
| | - Shahzad Raza
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Christy Samaras
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Jason Valent
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Jack Khouri
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Faiz Anwer
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huynh L, Birsen R, Mora L, Couderc AL, Mitha N, Farcet A, Chebib A, Chaibi P. Multiple Myeloma in Patients over 80: A Real World Retrospective Study of First Line Conservative Approach with Bortezomib Dexamethasone Doublet Therapy and Mini-Review of Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194741. [PMID: 36230662 PMCID: PMC9564122 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Data on octogenarian patients with MM are scarce, and optimal management remains controversial. We report a retrospective cohort of unselected octogenarian patients with NDMM treated with bortezomib dexamethasone (Vd). Seventy-four patients were treated with an initial doublet therapy (Vd regimen, 2−3 cycles, induction). A dose escalation with an adjunction of melphalan or cyclophosphamide was proposed for patients who had an insufficient response after induction and who could tolerate it. In responders, the treatment was continued until progression or a plateau response for 6 months (consolidation). The overall response rate was 73%. After a median follow-up of 31.4 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13.2 and 26.9 months, respectively. PFS and OS of patients with ECOG PS < 3 (25.4 and 54.9 months, respectively) were better in comparison to PFS and OS of patients with ECOG PS ≥ 3 (9.3 and 11.3 months, respectively). Thirteen patients (17.6%) died during induction. Twelve patients (16.2%) died during consolidation. In conclusion, a conservative therapeutic strategy based on Vd resulted in a good response rate. However, the survival remains poor in the population of patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 3, mainly because of early mortality not related to progressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Huynh
- Service d’Hématologie et Oncologie Gériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, APHP, 94200 Ivry Sur Seine, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Rudy Birsen
- Service d’Hématologie, Hôpital Cochin, APHP, Université de Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Lucie Mora
- Service d’Hématologie et Oncologie Gériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, APHP, 94200 Ivry Sur Seine, France
| | - Anne-Laure Couderc
- Service d’Hématologie et Oncologie Gériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, APHP, 94200 Ivry Sur Seine, France
| | - Nathalie Mitha
- Service d’Hématologie et Oncologie Gériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, APHP, 94200 Ivry Sur Seine, France
| | - Anaïs Farcet
- Service d’Hématologie et Oncologie Gériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, APHP, 94200 Ivry Sur Seine, France
| | - Amale Chebib
- Service d’Hématologie et Oncologie Gériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, APHP, 94200 Ivry Sur Seine, France
| | - Pascal Chaibi
- Service d’Hématologie et Oncologie Gériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, APHP, 94200 Ivry Sur Seine, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Costa BA, Mouhieddine TH, Richter J. What's Old is New: The Past, Present and Future Role of Thalidomide in the Modern-Day Management of Multiple Myeloma. Target Oncol 2022; 17:383-405. [PMID: 35771402 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00897-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) have become an integral part of therapy for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). IMiDs bind to cereblon, leading to the degradation of proteins involved in B-cell survival and proliferation. Thalidomide, a first-generation IMiD, has little to no myelosuppressive potential, negligible renal clearance, and long-proven anti-myeloma activity. However, thalidomide's adverse effects (e.g., somnolence, constipation, and peripheral neuropathy) and the advent of more potent therapeutic options has led to the drug being less frequently used in many countries, including the US and Canada. Newer-generation IMiDs, such as lenalidomide and pomalidomide, are utilized far more frequently. In numerous previous trials, salvage therapy with thalidomide (50-200 mg/day) plus corticosteroids (with or without selected cytotoxic or targeted agents) has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated in the RRMM setting. Hence, thalidomide-based regimens remain important alternatives for heavily pretreated patients, especially for those who have no access to novel therapies and/or are not eligible for their use (due to renal failure, high-grade myelosuppression, or significant comorbidities). Ongoing and future trials may provide further insights into the current role of thalidomide, especially by comparing thalidomide-containing regimens with protocols based on newer-generation IMiDs and by investigating thalidomide's association with novel therapies (e.g., antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Almeida Costa
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tarek H Mouhieddine
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1185, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Joshua Richter
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1185, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goel U, Usmani S, Kumar S. Current approaches to management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 2022; 97 Suppl 1:S3-S25. [PMID: 35234302 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Major developments in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) over the past decade have led to a continued improvement in survival. Significant progress has been made with deeper and longer remissions seen with newer treatment approaches-both for induction as well as maintenance therapy. The treatment approach to MM is guided by several factors including patient age, frailty, comorbidities, eligibility for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and risk stratification into standard-risk or high-risk MM. High-risk MM is defined by the presence of t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del (17p), TP53 mutation, or gain (1q). Transplant eligible patients should receive 4-6 cycles of induction followed by stem cell collection. Patients can then undergo ASCT, or continue induction therapy and shift to maintenance, delaying ASCT till first relapse. Transplant ineligible patients should receive induction therapy followed by maintenance. For induction therapy prior to ASCT, a proteasome inhibitor-IMiD combination remains standard with monoclonal antibody-based quadruplets preferred in high-risk patients. Among transplant ineligible patients, those with standard-risk MM should receive DRd continued until disease progression, while bortezomib containing regimens (VRd or VRd lite) can be considered for high-risk patients. Finally, standard-risk patients should receive lenalidomide maintenance after induction/ASCT, while proteasome inhibitor-IMiD combinations should be used for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utkarsh Goel
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| | - Saad Usmani
- Multiple Myeloma Service, Department of medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2021; 137:3616-3628. [PMID: 33763699 PMCID: PMC8462404 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020008787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Addition of ixazomib to Rd in nontransplant NDMM patients resulted in a nonstatistically significant increase in PFS (HR, 0.830; P = .073). Ixazomib-Rd is a feasible and tolerable all-oral triplet regimen in this setting, with a well-characterized and manageable safety profile.
Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is suitable for continuous dosing, with predictable, manageable toxicities. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM2 trial, transplant-ineligible NDMM patients were randomized to ixazomib 4 mg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 354) plus Rd. After 18 cycles, dexamethasone was discontinued and treatment was continued using reduced-dose ixazomib (3 mg) and lenalidomide (10 mg) until progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS was 35.3 vs 21.8 months with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.830; 95% confidence interval, 0.676-1.018; P = .073; median follow-up, 53.3 and 55.8 months). Complete (26% vs 14%; odds ratio [OR], 2.10; P < .001) and ≥ very good partial response (63% vs 48%; OR, 1.87; P < .001) rates were higher with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd. In a prespecified high-risk cytogenetics subgroup, median PFS was 23.8 vs 18.0 months (HR, 0.690; P = .019). Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly grade 1/2. With ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, 88% vs 81% of patients experienced grade ≥3 TEAEs, 66% vs 62% serious TEAEs, and 35% vs 27% TEAEs resulting in regimen discontinuation; 8% vs 6% died on study. Addition of ixazomib to Rd was tolerable with no new safety signals and led to a clinically meaningful PFS benefit of 13.5 months. Ixazomib-Rd is a feasible option for certain patients who can benefit from an all-oral triplet combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01850524.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohyuddin GR, Koehn K, Shune L, Aziz M, Abdallah AO, McClune B, Ganguly S, McGuirk J, Kambhampati S. Renal insufficiency in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized trials from 2005-2019. Leuk Lymphoma 2021; 62:1386-1395. [PMID: 33416412 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1867725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials may be inconsistent in their enrollment and reporting of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have renal insufficiency (RI). We performed a systematic review of all MM randomized clinical trials (RCT) from 2005-2019 to evaluate reporting of prevalence, eligibility criteria and outcomes of patients with RI and MM. One-hundred and twenty-three RCTs were included. Only 30% of studies clearly reported on the proportion of patients who had RI. Only 68.2% reported eligibility criteria pertaining to RI, with no uniformity in the reported criteria. The relative risk (RR) of disease progression or death in patients with RI was higher than those without, RR of 1.20 (1.003-1.431) for relapsed/refractory and 1.07 (1.001-1.046) for newly diagnosed. There is inconsistent reporting and enrollment of patients with RI on MM RCT's. We advocate for higher enrollment of patients with RI and transparent reporting of their eligibility criteria and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin
- Department of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Kelly Koehn
- Department of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Leyla Shune
- Department of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Muhammad Aziz
- Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Al-Ola Abdallah
- Department of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Brian McClune
- Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Siddhartha Ganguly
- Department of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Joseph McGuirk
- Department of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Suman Kambhampati
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kumar SK, Callander NS, Adekola K, Anderson L, Baljevic M, Campagnaro E, Castillo JJ, Chandler JC, Costello C, Efebera Y, Faiman M, Garfall A, Godby K, Hillengass J, Holmberg L, Htut M, Huff CA, Kang Y, Hultcrantz M, Larson S, Liedtke M, Martin T, Omel J, Shain K, Sborov D, Stockerl-Goldstein K, Weber D, Keller J, Kumar R. Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1685-1717. [PMID: 33285522 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells that accumulate in bone marrow, leading to bone destruction and marrow failure. This manuscript discusses the management of patients with solitary plasmacytoma, smoldering multiple myeloma, and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kehinde Adekola
- 3Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer of Center Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Jorge J Castillo
- 7Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | - Jason C Chandler
- 8St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | - Yvonne Efebera
- 10The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Matthew Faiman
- 11Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Alfred Garfall
- 12Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Leona Holmberg
- 15Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - Myo Htut
- 16City of Hope National Medical Center
| | - Carol Ann Huff
- 17The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Martin
- 22UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Donna Weber
- 27The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen CI, Cao Y, Trudel S, Reece DE, Kukreti V, Tiedemann R, Prica A, Paul H, Le LW, Levina O, Kakar S, Lau A, Chen H, Chen E. An open-label, pharmacokinetic study of lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients with various degrees of renal impairment - validation of official dosing guidelines. Leuk Lymphoma 2020; 61:1860-1868. [PMID: 32476520 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1747064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Lenalidomide is a backbone agent in the treatment of multiple myeloma, but dose adjustment is required for those with renal impairment (RI). We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of lenalidomide and dexamethasone as frontline pre-transplant induction, with doses adjusted at start of each cycle based on creatinine clearance, as per the official dosing guidelines. After 4 cycles, PK studies showed that patients with moderate RI (30 ≤ CrCl < 60 mL/min) receiving 10 mg dosing may be under-dosed and those with severe RI (CrCl <30ml/min) appeared appropriately dosed initially, but sustained significant decreases in maximum serum concentration (Cmax) after repeated dosing, due to rapid clinical improvement and enhanced drug clearance. PK drug monitoring during cycle 1 may facilitate appropriate and timely dose adjustments. Adverse events rates did not vary based on severity of RI. No patient discontinued lenalidomide for toxicity. This supports the feasibility and safety of frontline lenalidomide in transplant-eligible patients with RI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine I Chen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yanshuo Cao
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Suzanne Trudel
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Donna E Reece
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vishal Kukreti
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rodger Tiedemann
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anca Prica
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Harminder Paul
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa W Le
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Olga Levina
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sumeet Kakar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anthea Lau
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Eric Chen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Merz M, Dechow T, Scheytt M, Schmidt C, Hackanson B, Knop S. The clinical management of lenalidomide-based therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 2020; 99:1709-1725. [PMID: 32296915 PMCID: PMC7340649 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04023-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Lenalidomide is an integral, yet evolving, part of current treatment pathways for both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is approved in combination with dexamethasone as first-line therapy for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM, and as maintenance treatment following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Although strong clinical trial evidence has supported the integration of lenalidomide into current treatment paradigms for NDMM, applying those paradigms to individual patients and determining which patients are most likely to benefit from lenalidomide treatment are more complex. In this paper, we utilize the available clinical trial evidence to provide recommendations for patient selection and lenalidomide dosing in both the first-line setting in patients ineligible for ASCT and the maintenance setting in patients who have undergone ASCT. In addition, we provide guidance on management of those adverse events that are most commonly associated with lenalidomide treatment, and consider the optimal selection and sequencing of next-line agents following long-term frontline or maintenance treatment with lenalidomide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Merz
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Multiple Myeloma Division, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Dechow
- Private Oncology Practice Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Mithun Scheytt
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Medical Oncology Division, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christian Schmidt
- Grosshadern University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Bjoern Hackanson
- Department of Internal Medicine II and ICCA, Augsburg University Hospital, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Knop
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Medical Oncology Division, Würzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Batko K, Malyszko J, Jurczyszyn A, Vesole DH, Gertz MA, Leleu X, Suska A, Krzanowski M, Sułowicz W, Malyszko JS, Krzanowska K. The clinical implication of monoclonal gammopathies: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and of renal significance. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 34:1440-1452. [PMID: 30169860 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) has introduced a new perspective to several well-known disease entities impacting nephrology, haematology and pathology. Given the constantly changing disease spectrum of these entities, it is clinically imperative to establish diagnostic and treatment pathways supported by evidence-based medicine. MGRS is a disease of the kidney, secondary to plasma cell clonal proliferation or immune dysfunction, requiring therapeutic intervention to eradicate the offending clone. To fully understand the disease(s), it is prerequisite to determine the significance of the findings. The diagnostic work up should be extensive due to the wide heterogeneity of clinical presentation, ultimately necessitating kidney biopsy. Particular patient profiles such as AL amyloidosis, which may be diagnosed through biopsies of other tissues/organs, may be an exception. Treatment decisions should be formulated by multi-disciplinary consensus: nephrologists, haematologists and pathologists. The ultimate goal in managing MGRS is eradication of the offending plasma cell clone which requires targeted chemotherapy and, in eligible cases, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We present a review of diagnostic procedures, treatment options and advances in the last few years in the management of MGRS in an effort to acquaint specialists with this new face of several older diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Batko
- Departament of Nephrology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Jolanta Malyszko
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Artur Jurczyszyn
- Departament of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - David H Vesole
- Myeloma DIvision, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Morie A Gertz
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xavier Leleu
- Service d`Hematologie CHU, Hopital de la Miletrie, Poitiers, France
| | - Anna Suska
- Departament of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Marcin Krzanowski
- Departament of Nephrology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Władysław Sułowicz
- Departament of Nephrology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Jacek S Malyszko
- 1st Department of Nephrology, Medical University, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Krzanowska
- Departament of Nephrology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dimopoulos MA, Jakubowiak AJ, McCarthy PL, Orlowski RZ, Attal M, Bladé J, Goldschmidt H, Weisel KC, Ramasamy K, Zweegman S, Spencer A, Huang JSY, Lu J, Sunami K, Iida S, Chng WJ, Holstein SA, Rocci A, Skacel T, Labotka R, Palumbo A, Anderson KC. Developments in continuous therapy and maintenance treatment approaches for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2020; 10:17. [PMID: 32054831 PMCID: PMC7018731 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-0273-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The evolving paradigm of continuous therapy and maintenance treatment approaches in multiple myeloma (MM) offers prolonged disease control and improved outcomes compared to traditional fixed-duration approaches. Potential benefits of long-term strategies include sustained control of disease symptoms, as well as continued cytoreduction and clonal control, leading to unmeasurable residual disease and the possibility of transforming MM into a chronic or functionally curable condition. "Continuous therapy" commonly refers to administering a doublet or triplet regimen until disease progression, whereas maintenance approaches typically involve single-agent or doublet treatment following more intensive prior therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or doublet, triplet, or even quadruplet induction therapy. However, the requirements for agents and regimens within these contexts are similar: treatments must be tolerable for a prolonged period of time, should not be associated with cumulative or chronic toxicity, should not adversely affect patients' quality of life, should ideally be convenient with a minimal treatment burden for patients, and should not impact the feasibility or efficacy of subsequent treatment at relapse. Multiple agents have been and are being investigated as long-term options in the treatment of newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), including the immunomodulatory drugs lenalidomide and thalidomide, the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, and the monoclonal antibodies daratumumab, elotuzumab, and isatuximab. Here we review the latest results with long-term therapy approaches in three different settings in NDMM: (1) maintenance treatment post ASCT; (2) continuous frontline therapy in nontransplant patients; (3) maintenance treatment post-frontline therapy in the nontransplant setting. We also discuss evidence from key phase 3 trials. Our review demonstrates how the paradigm of long-term treatment is increasingly well-established across NDMM treatment settings, potentially resulting in further improvements in patient outcomes, and highlights key clinical issues that will need to be addressed in order to provide optimal benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
| | | | | | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michel Attal
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | - Joan Bladé
- Hematology Department, Hospital Clinic, Institut de Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Medical Hospital and National Center of Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja C Weisel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Spencer
- Malignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Jin Lu
- Department of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital and Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
| | - Kazutaka Sunami
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Iida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Wee-Joo Chng
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Health System, and Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sarah A Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Alberto Rocci
- Department of Haematology, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Science, Division of Cancer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tomas Skacel
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Richard Labotka
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Antonio Palumbo
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jo JC, Lee HS, Kim K, Lee JJ, Yoon SS, Bang SM, Kim JS, Eom HS, Yoon DH, Lee Y, Shin HJ, Park Y, Lee WS, Do YR, Mun YC, Lee MH, Kim HJ, Kim SH, Kim MK, Lim SN, Cho SH, Park SK, Yi JH, Lee JH, Kim J, Min CK. The effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in real-world clinical practice: a study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-151 study). Ann Hematol 2019; 99:309-319. [DOI: 10.1007/s00277-019-03904-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
Piechotta V, Jakob T, Langer P, Monsef I, Scheid C, Estcourt LJ, Ocheni S, Theurich S, Kuhr K, Scheckel B, Adams A, Skoetz N. Multiple drug combinations of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and thalidomide for first-line treatment in adults with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2019:CD013487. [PMID: 31765002 PMCID: PMC6876545 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow-based hematological malignancy accounting for approximately two per cent of cancers. First-line treatment for transplant-ineligible individuals consists of multiple drug combinations of bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), or thalidomide (T). However, access to these medicines is restricted in many countries worldwide. OBJECTIVES To assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of multiple drug combinations of V, R, and T for adults with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma and to inform an application for the inclusion of these medicines into the World Health Organization's (WHO) list of essential medicines. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL and MEDLINE, conference proceedings and study registries on 14 February 2019 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple drug combinations of V, R and T for adults with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing combination therapies of V, R, and T, plus melphalan and prednisone (MP) or dexamethasone (D) for first-line treatment of adults with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. We excluded trials including adults with relapsed or refractory disease, trials comparing drug therapies to other types of therapy and trials including second-generation novel agents. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included trials. As effect measures we used hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events. An HR or RR < 1 indicates an advantage for the intervention compared to the main comparator MP. Where available, we extracted quality of life (QoL) data (scores of standardised questionnaires). Results quoted are from network meta-analysis (NMA) unless stated. MAIN RESULTS We included 25 studies (148 references) comprising 11,403 participants and 21 treatment regimens. Treatments were differentiated between restricted treatment duration (treatment with a pre-specified amount of cycles) and continuous therapy (treatment administered until disease progression, the person becomes intolerant to the drug, or treatment given for a prolonged period). Continuous therapies are indicated with a "c". Risk of bias was generally high across studies due to the open-label study design. Overall survival (OS) Evidence suggests that treatment with RD (HR 0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.99), median OS 55.2 months (35.2 to 87.0)); TMP (HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.97), median OS: 46.4 months (35.9 to 60.0)); and VRDc (HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.92), median OS 71.0 months (37.8 to 133.8)) probably increases survival compared to median reported OS of 34.8 months with MP (moderate certainty). Treatment with VMP may result in a large increase in OS, compared to MP (HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.07), median OS 49.7 months (32.5 to 77.3)), low certainty). Progression-free survival (PFS) Treatment withRD (HR 0.65 (95% CI0.44 to 0.96), median PFS: 24.9 months (16.9 to 36.8)); TMP (HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.78), median PFS:25.7 months (20.8 to 32.4)); VMP (HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.90), median PFS: 28.9 months (18.0 to 46.3)); and VRDc (HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.58), median PFS: 47.6 months (27.9 to 81.0)) may result in a large increase in PFS (low certainty) compared to MP (median reported PFS: 16.2 months). Adverse events The risk of polyneuropathies may be lower with RD compared to treatment with MP (RR 0.57 (95% CI 0.16 to 1.99), risk for RD: 0.5% (0.1 to 1.8), mean reported risk for MP: 0.9% (10 of 1074 patients affected), low certainty). However, the CIs are also compatible with no difference or an increase in neuropathies. Treatment with TMP (RR 4.44 (95% CI1.77 to 11.11), risk: 4.0% (1.6 to 10.0)) and VMP (RR 88.22 (95% CI 5.36 to 1451.11), risk: 79.4% (4.8 to 1306.0)) probably results in a large increase in polyneuropathies compared to MP (moderate certainty). No study reported the amount of participants with grade ≥ 3 polyneuropathies for treatment with VRDc. VMP probably increases the proportion of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to MP (RR 1.28 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.54), risk for VMP: 46.2% (38.3 to 55.6), mean risk for MP: 36.1% (177 of 490 patients affected), moderate certainty). RD, TMP, and VRDc were not connected to MP in the network and the risk of SAEs could not be compared. Treatment with RD (RR 4.18 (95% CI 2.13 to 8.20), NMA-risk: 38.5% (19.6 to 75.4)); and TMP (RR 4.10 (95% CI 2.40 to 7.01), risk: 37.7% (22.1 to 64.5)) results in a large increase of withdrawals from the trial due to adverse events (high certainty) compared to MP (mean reported risk: 9.2% (77 of 837 patients withdrew)). The risk is probably slightly increased with VMP (RR 1.06 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.81), risk: 9.75% (5.8 to 16.7), moderate certainty), while it is much increased with VRDc (RR 8.92 (95% CI 3.82 to 20.84), risk: 82.1% (35.1 to 191.7), high certainty) compared to MP. Quality of life QoL was reported in four studies for seven different treatment regimens (MP, MPc, RD, RMP, RMPc, TMP, TMPc) and was measured with four different tools. Assessment and reporting differed between studies and could not be meta-analysed. However, all studies reported an improvement of QoL after initiation of anti-myeloma treatment for all assessed treatment regimens. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on our four pre-selected comparisons of interest, continuous treatment with VRD had the largest survival benefit compared with MP, while RD and TMP also probably considerably increase survival. However, treatment combinations of V, R, and T also substantially increase the incidence of AEs, and lead to a higher risk of treatment discontinuation. Their effectiveness and safety profiles may best be analysed in further randomised head-to-head trials. Further trials should focus on consistent reporting of safety outcomes and should use a standardised instrument to evaluate QoL to ensure comparability of treatment-combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Piechotta
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Tina Jakob
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Peter Langer
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Ina Monsef
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Christof Scheid
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Stem Cell Transplantation Program, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
| | - Lise J Estcourt
- NHS Blood and Transplant, Haematology/Transfusion Medicine, Level 2, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 9BQ
| | - Sunday Ocheni
- University of Nigeria, Department of Haematology & Immunology, Ituku-Ozalla Campus, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria
| | - Sebastian Theurich
- University Hospital LMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Medicine III, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 81377
| | - Kathrin Kuhr
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany, 50937
| | - Benjamin Scheckel
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Haematology, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50937
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Gleueler Str. 176-178, Cologne, NRW, Germany, 50935
| | - Anne Adams
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany, 50937
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cochrane Cancer, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany, 50937
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Merz AMA, Merz M, Hillengass J, Holstein SA, McCarthy P. The evolving role of maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:889-898. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1674142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Almuth Maria Anni Merz
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Multiple Myeloma, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Maximilian Merz
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Multiple Myeloma, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Division of Multiple Myeloma, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sarah A. Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Philip McCarthy
- Transplant & Cellular Therapy Center, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kumar L, Chellapuram SK, Dev R, Varshneya A, Pawar S, Sharma A, Mookerjee A, Sahoo RK, Malik PS, Sharma A, Gupta R, Sharma O, Biswas A, Kumar R, Thulkar S, Mallick S. Induction Therapy with Novel Agents and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Overcomes the Adverse Impact of Renal Impairment in Multiple Myeloma. Clin Hematol Int 2019; 1:205-219. [PMID: 34595432 PMCID: PMC8432369 DOI: 10.2991/chi.d.190805.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the impact of renal impairment (RI) on the outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) patients following induction and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Among 349 patients who received a first ASCT for MM, 86 (24.6%) had RI at diagnosis, defined as estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. Post induction reversal of renal function occurred in 68 (79%) patients including complete renal response in 37.2%. Two hundred and fifty-one patients had received novel agents for induction; posttransplant complete response (CR) rates were 71.4% for patients with renal impairment (RI) versus 67.2% in those without RI, p = 0.23. The quality of stem cell collection and days to engraftment were similar except that patients with RI required higher transfusion numbers of packed red cells (p < 0.002) and platelets (p < 0.007). The median overall survival (OS) was 96 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.80–119.20) for patients with eGFR ≥40 mL/min, n = 195) versus 62 months (95% CI 28.7–95.3) for 56 patients with RI (eGFR <40 mL/min), p = 0.15. The 5-year OS was 64.6% versus 54.4%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 52 months (95% CI 36.3–67.7) for patients with eGFR ≥40 mL/min versus “not reached” for those with eGFR <40 mL/min p = 0.87; and the 5-year PFS was 48.1% versus 51%, respectively. We conclude that induction with novel agents results in reversal of renal dysfunction in the majority of patients. Consolidation with Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) overcomes the adverse impact of RI on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Santosh Kumar Chellapuram
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Ramavat Dev
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Ankur Varshneya
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Satyajit Pawar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Aparna Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Anjali Mookerjee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Ranjit Kumar Sahoo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Prabhat Singh Malik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Atul Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, Room 234, IRCH Building, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Ritu Gupta
- Department of Lab Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Omdutta Sharma
- Department of Lab Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Ahitagni Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Sanjay Thulkar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Sauumyaranjan Mallick
- Department of Pathology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, Costello C, Dhodapkar MV, Kumar S, Lacy M, Lipe B, Little RF, Nikonova A, Omel J, Peswani N, Prica A, Raje N, Seth R, Vesole DH, Walker I, Whitley A, Wildes TM, Wong SW, Martin T. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1228-1263. [PMID: 30932732 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations on the treatment of multiple myeloma to practicing physicians and others. METHODS ASCO and Cancer Care Ontario convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and some phase II studies published from 2005 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, progression-free survival, response rate, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed for patients with multiple myeloma who are transplantation eligible and those who are ineligible and for patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mikhael
- 1 City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ.,2 International Myeloma Foundation, North Hollywood, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brea Lipe
- 8 University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | - Anna Nikonova
- 10 Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Omel
- 11 Education and Advocacy, Grand Island, NE
| | | | - Anca Prica
- 13 Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Noopur Raje
- 14 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rahul Seth
- 15 Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - David H Vesole
- 16 Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.,17 Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Irwin Walker
- 18 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Sandy W Wong
- 21 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tom Martin
- 21 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Radocha J, Hájek R, Brožová L, Pour L, Špička I, Minařík J, Gregora E, Jungová A, Jelínek T, Heindorfer A, Sýkora M, Maisnar V. Simplified novel prognostic score for real-life older adults with multiple myeloma-registry-based analysis. Ann Hematol 2018; 98:951-962. [PMID: 30539278 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3568-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The main goal was to find a simple prognostic to evaluate overall survival of patients older than 65 years of age with myeloma. Retrospective registry-based analysis from the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies was conducted. Patients over 65 years with symptomatic myeloma were included. The four major parameters with impact on survival were identified: male gender, age > 75, creatinine > 152 μmol/L, and ECOG performance status 2-4. The patients were scored as good (0 points), intermediate good (1 point), intermediate poor (2 points), poor (3-4 points). Patients (1410 MM) were included. Median OS (months) was 65.7 (95% CI 49.8-81.7) for good, 51.0 (44.1-57.8) for intermediate good, 32.2 (26.2-38.2) for intermediate poor, and 18.9 (15.1-22.7) for poor. The differences in OS were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Good score was used as reference for hazard ratios, which for each other score were 1.43 (1.09-1.84) for intermediate good, 2.58 (2.00-3.33) for intermediate poor, and 3.88 (2.94-5.10) for poor. Time to progression showed medians (months) 20.5 (17.4-62.4) for good, 19.3 (17.0-21.7) for intermediate good, 19.6 (16.2-23.0) for intermediate poor, and 13.0 (10.8-15.2) for poor. The suggested scoring system provides readily available information about the prognosis of MM patients above 65 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Radocha
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology, Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. .,Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - R Hájek
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - L Brožová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - L Pour
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk Universtiy, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - I Špička
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,1st Medical Department - Clinical Department of Haematology of the First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Minařík
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - E Gregora
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Jungová
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Hematology and Oncology Department, Charles University Hospital Pilsen, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - T Jelínek
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - A Heindorfer
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Clinical Hematology, Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic
| | - M Sýkora
- Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Clinical Hematology, Hospital Ceske Budejovice, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - V Maisnar
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology, Faculty Hospital, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.,Czech Myeloma Group, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hari P, Blazer M, Raju A, Farrelly E, Labotka R, Skacel T, Romanus D. Adoption of triplet therapy and clinical outcomes in routine practice among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not receiving frontline stem cell transplant in the USA. Expert Rev Hematol 2018; 12:71-79. [PMID: 30513016 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2019.1555460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunomodulator (IMID) and proteasome inhibitor (PI) triplet frontline therapy (FT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) trials improve overall survival (OS); reported outcomes in routine practice are lacking. Authors compared outcomes in NDMM patients in the USA by use of triplet vs doublet FTs. METHODS In this retrospective study of NDMM patients without FT transplant between 1/1/2008 and 6/30/2017, FT was categorized as: PI+IMID-triplet (≥ 3 drugs including PI+IMID), non-PI+IMID-triplet (≥ 3 drugs, not PI+IMID), doublet (≤ 2 drugs). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified FT triplet predictors and compared time-to-next-treatment (TTNT)/OS. RESULTS Among 4,982 NDMM patients, 68% and 32% initiated doublet and triplet FTs (PI+IMID: 36% in 2017). Triplet FT predictors included: age, cytogenetics, ISS stage, certain CRAB symptoms. Median TTNTPI+IMID-triplet = 18.9 months vs 13.7 (non-PI+IMID-triplet) and 16.5 months (doublet) FTs (P< 0.01); adjusted HRPI+IMID-triplet = 0.86; P= 0.009; HRnon-PI+IMID-triplet = 1.10; P = 0.083 vs doublet FT. Median OSPI+IMID-triplet = 58.7 months vs 43.6 (non-PI+IMID-triplet) and 45.7 months (doublet) FTs (P< 0.01); adjusted HRPI+IMID-triplet = 0.83; P= 0.016; HRnon-PI+IMID-triplet = 1.02; P = 0.727 vs doublet FT. CONCLUSION PI+IMID-triplet FT is not utilized for most non-frontline-transplant NDMM patients in routine care but is associated with prolonged TTNT/OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parameswaran Hari
- a Department of Medicine , Medical College of Wisconsin , Milwaukee , WI , USA
| | | | | | | | - Richard Labotka
- c Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited , Cambridge , UK
| | - Tomas Skacel
- c Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited , Cambridge , UK
| | - Dorothy Romanus
- c Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited , Cambridge , UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Facon T, Anderson K. Treatment approach for the older, unfit patient with myeloma from diagnosis to relapse: perspectives of a European hematologist. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2018; 2018:83-87. [PMID: 30504295 PMCID: PMC6245965 DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Mrs. A. is a 73-year-old woman who has developed increasing fatigue and lower back pain over the past year. The pain limits her exercise tolerance such that she can now walk only 1 block. She is a retired schoolteacher who does volunteer efforts in her community but has limited her activities due to fatigue. Karnofsky performance status is 70%. She has a history of chronic hypertension treated with a diuretic, adult-onset diabetes mellitus treated with metformin, and hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine. Initial evaluation reveals anemia, renal dysfunction, an elevated total protein, and an L2 compression fracture on lumbosacral radiographs. Results of initial and subsequent evaluation are shown below, and she is referred to a hematologist for further evaluation, which revealed the following: calcium 9.0 mg/dL, creatinine 3.2 mg/dL with estimated creatinine clearance using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation of 15 mL/min, hemoglobin 9.6 g/dL, total protein 11 g/dL, albumin 3.2 g/dL, immunoglobulin A (IgA) λ M protein 6.8 g/dL, total IgA 7.2 g/dL, IgG 0.4 g/dL, IgM 0.03 g/dL, free κ <0.01 mg/L, free λ 1000 mg/L, free light chain ratio <0.01, β-2-microglobulin 4.2, viscosity 3.0, lactate dehydrogenase 200 U/L, urine protein electrophoresis: 125 mg/dL with 30% M protein, and urine immuno-electrophoresis: λ light chain. Skeletal bone survey showed lytic lesions in femurs and humeri and diffusely in ribs bilaterally as well as compression fractures at T4, T6, and L2. Bone marrow biopsy revealed λ-restricted plasma cells comprising 50% of the bone marrow core. Fluorescence in situ hybridization testing on marrow showed that del(17p) was present in 80% of the plasma cells. Mrs. A. is informed of the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and the need for therapy. She requests consultation with 2 of the leading world experts. However, she wants to be treated near her home and does not want treatment on a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Facon
- Department of Haematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France; and
| | - Kenneth Anderson
- Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schmidts A, Grünewald J, Kleber M, Terpos E, Ihorst G, Reinhardt H, Walz G, Wäsch R, Engelhardt M, Zschiedrich S. GFR estimation in lenalidomide treatment of multiple myeloma patients: a prospective cohort study. Clin Exp Nephrol 2018; 23:199-206. [PMID: 30128942 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-018-1626-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is clinically used to approximate renal function and adapt drug dosage. Multiple myeloma is a hematological disease; its prognosis is largely influenced by renal function. We evaluated two commonly used GFR estimations, CKD-EPI and MDRD (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) in myeloma patients undergoing treatment with lenalidomide, a renally excreted immunomodulatory drug. METHODS We prospectively studied 130 myeloma patients receiving lenalidomide treatment at our institution. At baseline and after 3 months, GFR estimations were performed based on the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations. We compared eGFR-dependent CKD staging and lenalidomide dosage assignments. RESULTS Initially, most patients were classified as CKD stage I/II, using both equations. Comparison of baseline renal function via CKD-EPI and MDRD induced concordance of CKD staging in 83% of patients, while CKD-EPI improved CKD staging in 16% of patients (p = 0.11). CKD-EPI assigned 3% of patients to higher lenalidomide dosing as opposed to MDRD. Both equations showed improved eGFR after 3 months of lenalidomide treatment. CONCLUSIONS In our multiple myeloma patient cohort, CKD-EPI and MDRD led to similar CKD staging with minor differences in lenalidomide dosage assignment. Consistent with previous studies, eGFR improved under lenalidomide treatment. To standardize GFR estimation in myeloma patients, we suggest using the CKD-EPI equation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Schmidts
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Julian Grünewald
- Department of Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kleber
- Divisions of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gabriele Ihorst
- Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Heike Reinhardt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerd Walz
- Department of Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Wäsch
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Monika Engelhardt
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Zschiedrich
- Department of Nephrology and Primary Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Faiman B. Disease and Symptom Care: A Focus on Specific Needs of Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2017; 21:3-6. [PMID: 28945733 DOI: 10.1188/17.cjon.s5.3-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often deal with short- and long-term side effects of the treatment and disease sequelae. Reasons for inadequately managed symptoms are multifactorial (e.g., the patient may fear treatment interruption, the clinician does not assess or address the symptoms) and can affect patients' ability to remain on the recommended treatment. This article provides background surrounding this supplement's development and describes the importance of symptom assessment and management.
.
Collapse
|
24
|
Brigle K, Pierre A, Finley-Oliver E, Faiman B, Tariman J, Miceli T, Board A. Myelosuppression, Bone Disease, and Acute Renal Failure: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Oncologic Emergencies. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2017; 21:60-76. [DOI: 10.1188/17.cjon.s5.60-76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
25
|
Faiman B, Doss D, Colson K, Mangan P, King T, Tariman J, Board A. Renal, GI, and Peripheral Nerves: Evidence-Based Recommendations for the Management of Symptoms and Care for Patients With Multiple Myeloma. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2017; 21:19-36. [DOI: 10.1188/17.cjon.s5.19-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
26
|
MacEwan JP, Batt K, Yin W, Peneva D, Sison S, Vine S, Chen C. Economic burden of multiple myeloma among patients in successive lines of therapy in the United States. Leuk Lymphoma 2017; 59:941-949. [PMID: 28805105 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1361035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
This study characterized the costs of multiple myeloma (MM) during first-line (1L), second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) treatment from the US payer perspective. Patients with ≥2 outpatient or ≥1 inpatient claims with a primary MM diagnosis and 12 months continuous enrollment post index were identified in a retrospective claims database between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2013. A cost per-patient per-month (PPPM) metric was used to calculate total all-cause and anti-MM pharmacy costs in 1L, 2L, and 3L treatment. Of 5704 patients included, 3626 initiated 1L treatment, 1797 initiated 2L and 817 initiated 3L. Average total all-cause PPPM costs were $22,527 in 1L, $35,266 in 2L and $47,417 in 3L. Anti-MM pharmacy costs represented 22%, 29% and 29% of total all-cause costs PPPM in 1L, 2L and 3L, respectively. Study results suggest that delaying 2L and/or 3L treatment initiation may result in lower treatment costs for patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katharine Batt
- b Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center , Winston-Salem , NC , USA
| | - Wes Yin
- c University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles , CA , USA
| | - Desi Peneva
- a Precision Health Economics , Los Angeles , CA , USA
| | - Steve Sison
- a Precision Health Economics , Los Angeles , CA , USA
| | - Seanna Vine
- a Precision Health Economics , Los Angeles , CA , USA
| | - Clara Chen
- d Bristol-Myers Squibb , Princeton , NJ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Posttransplant maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: the changing landscape. Blood Cancer J 2017; 7:e545. [PMID: 28338672 PMCID: PMC5380907 DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM) now have extended survival after diagnosis owing to effective modern treatment strategies that include new agents in induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), consolidation therapy and posttransplant maintenance therapy. Standard of care for newly diagnosed, fit patients includes ASCT and, often nowadays, posttransplant maintenance. Several large studies have shown the efficacy of maintenance with thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib in the treatment scheme of MM with regards to prolonging progression-free survival and, to a lesser degree, overall survival. Herein we discuss the data currently available to support the use of maintenance therapy in patients after ASCT as well as the newer available agents that may be a part of its changing landscape in the years to come.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Lenalidomide is a lead therapeutic in multiple myeloma and deletion 5q myelodysplastic syndromes and shows promising activities in other hematologic malignancies. This article presents a comprehensive review of the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lenalidomide. Oral lenalidomide is rapidly and highly absorbed (>90 % of dose) under fasting conditions. Food affects oral absorption, reducing area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 20 % and maximum concentration (C max) by 50 %. The increase in AUC and C max is dose proportional, and interindividual variability in plasma exposure is low to moderate. Lenalidomide distributes into semen but is undetectable 3 days after stopping treatment. Biotransformation of lenalidomide in humans includes chiral inversion, trivial hydroxylation, and slow non-enzymatic hydrolysis. Approximately 82 % of an oral dose is excreted as lenalidomide in urine within 24 h. Lenalidomide has a short half-life (3-4 h) and does not accumulate in plasma upon repeated dosing. Its pharmacokinetics are consistent across patient populations, regardless of the type of hematologic malignancy. Renal function is the only important factor affecting lenalidomide plasma exposure. Lenalidomide has no QT prolongation risk at approved doses, and higher plasma exposure to lenalidomide is associated with increased risk of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Despite being a weak substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro, lenalidomide does not have clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with P-gp substrates/inhibitors in controlled studies. The AUC-matched dose adjustment is recommended for patients with renal impairment at the start of therapy. No dose adjustment for lenalidomide is needed on the basis of age, ethnicity, mild hepatic impairment, or drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nianhang Chen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA.
| | - Simon Zhou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA
| | - Maria Palmisano
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Leung N, Merlini G, Ludwig H, Kastritis E, Goldschmidt H, Joshua D, Orlowski RZ, Powles R, Vesole DH, Garderet L, Einsele H, Palumbo A, Cavo M, Richardson PG, Moreau P, San Miguel J, Rajkumar SV, Durie BG, Terpos E. International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Myeloma-Related Renal Impairment. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1544-57. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.65.0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practical recommendations for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma–related renal impairment (RI). Methods Recommendations were based on published data through December 2015, and were developed using the system developed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group. Recommendations All patients with myeloma at diagnosis and at disease assessment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and electrolytes measurements as well as free light chain, if available, and urine electrophoresis of a sample from a 24-hour urine collection (grade A). The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, preferably, or the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula should be used for the evaluation of estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with stabilized serum creatinine (grade A). International Myeloma Working Group criteria for renal reversibility should be used (grade B). For the management of RI in patients with multiple myeloma, high fluid intake is indicated along with antimyeloma therapy (grade B). The use of high-cutoff hemodialysis membranes in combination with antimyeloma therapy can be considered (grade B). Bortezomib-based regimens remain the cornerstone of the management of myeloma-related RI (grade A). High-dose dexamethasone should be administered at least for the first month of therapy (grade B). Thalidomide is effective in patients with myeloma with RI, and no dose modifications are needed (grade B). Lenalidomide is effective and safe, mainly in patients with mild to moderate RI (grade B); for patients with severe RI or on dialysis, lenalidomide should be given with close monitoring for hematologic toxicity (grade B) with dose reduction as needed. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (with melphalan 100 mg/m2 to 140 mg/m2) is feasible in patients with RI (grade C). Carfilzomib can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 15 mL/min, whereas ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min (grade A).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Nelson Leung
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Giampaolo Merlini
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Heinz Ludwig
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Efstathios Kastritis
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas Joshua
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Robert Z. Orlowski
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Raymond Powles
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - David H. Vesole
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Laurent Garderet
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Antonio Palumbo
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michele Cavo
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Paul G. Richardson
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jesús San Miguel
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - S. Vincent Rajkumar
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Brian G.M. Durie
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajkumar, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Robert Z. Orlowski, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; David H. Vesole, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ; Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|