Molecular and clinical profile of von Willebrand disease in Spain (PCM-EVW-ES): comprehensive genetic analysis by next-generation sequencing of 480 patients

Clinical, Phenotypic and Genotypic Characteristics of Von Willebrand Disease in Afro-Caribbeans: Results From a Study in Martinique Island, French West Indies

BACKGROUND

Several cohort studies have investigated the molecular basis of von Willebrand disease (VWD); very few have focused on the Afro-Caribbean population.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the genotypic and phenotypic characterization of VWD in a large cohort of Afro-Caribbean patients living in Martinique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 31 families comprising 63 Afro-Caribbean patients with VWD were enrolled. A standardized questionnaire and blood samples were collected for biological and molecular genetic analyses of von Willebrand factor (VWF). The impact of new missense variants has been predicted by in silico studies.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 53 years (range 9-99). The most frequent symptoms were menorrhagia (49%), easy bruising (44%) and prolonged bleeding after tooth extraction (42%). Fifteen patients (24%) had quantitative deficiencies of VWF, of whom 13 (21%) were assigned as VWD-type 1, 1 (1%) as VWD-type 1C and 1 (2%) as VWD-type 3. Forty-five patients were diagnosed with VWD-type 2 (qualitative defects of VWF) (71%). VWD-type 2A was the most frequent, with 36 patients. Seven patients had VWD-type 2M and two patients had VWD-type 2B. Three patients (5%) had an indeterminate effect of the VWF defect due to ISTH BAT at 0. Forty-eight different VWF variants, including 4 novel variants, were identified in 63 patients. The variants consisted of 34 (71%) missense, 7 (15%) synonymous, 3 (6%) frameshifts, 2 (4%) small deletions and 2 (4%) gene conversions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the unique distribution of genotypes in our cohort of Afro-Caribbean VWD patients living in Martinique.

ESSENTIALS

Genotype-phenotype correlation was assessed in VWD Afro-Caribbean patients with one or more VWF variants. Menorrhagia, easy bruising and prolonged bleeding after tooth extraction are common in VWD patients. Efforts to increase the awareness and diagnosis of VWD have contributed to a better identification of patients with bleeding disorders.

Clinical utility of panel-based genetic sequencing for von Willebrand disease

Background

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder with a wide spectrum of causative variants. Next-generation sequencing analyzes the entire VWF gene and provides concomitant assessment of other genes, allowing differentiation between genocopies.

Objectives

We aimed to assess the clinical impact of panel-based sequencing in all VWD patients sequenced at UZ Leuven.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of all patients with confirmed or suspected VWD who were screened with panel-based whole-exome sequencing. Presequencing diagnosis was performed using laboratory measures of VWF activity and quantity. Postsequencing diagnosis was informed by variant curation in combination with laboratory measures. We measured clinically meaningful changes in the pre- vs postgenetic sequencing diagnosis and subtyping.

Results

The study included 108 patients. The population was predominantly composed of pediatric patients <18 years old (77/108; 71%) and females (66/108; 61%). The largest presequencing subgroup was those with low VWF (61/108; 56%), followed by type 1 VWD (21/108; 19%) and type 2 not otherwise specified (18/108; 17%). A clinically meaningful change in management occurred in 19% (20/108) of the study population. The largest effect was seen in the presequencing type 2 group (16/24; 67%). In the type 2 group who could not be accurately subtyped into 2A/B/M/N prior to sequencing (type 2 not otherwise specified), 15/18 (83%) were able to be subtyped or given a different diagnosis postsequencing.

Conclusion

Panel-based sequencing for VWD in a well-selected cohort, particularly those with type 2 and type 3 VWD, was clinically relevant in differentiating genocopies, directing therapies, and family planning. Sequencing in those with low VWF and type 1 VWD rarely changed management.

Challenges and considerations of genetic testing in von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder characterized by defects in the quantity or function of the von Willebrand factor (VWF). The diagnosis of VWD is complex, requiring a battery of tests to evaluate the amount, functions, and multimeric structure of the VWF glycoprotein. The diagnosis can also be accomplished or confirmed by sequencing the VWF gene (VWF). Genetic testing of VWF has been around for 4 decades following the cloning of VWF, and nowadays, it has been integrated into the diagnostic panel of VWD. With the introduction of next-generation sequencing, genetic analysis of the VWF has become more practical than it was in the past, when Sanger sequencing was used. A number of laboratories have applied or started to use genetic testing with next-generation sequencing for VWD diagnosis. Considering the increasing application of genetic testing in VWD and the wide availability and decreasing cost of gene sequencing, we sought to discuss the challenges and considerations involved in applying genetic testing to VWD.

Genetic variations of type 2 and type 3 von Willebrand diseases in Thailand

AIMS

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an inherited haemostatic disorder with a wide range of bleeding phenotypes based on von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels. Multiple assays including VWF gene analysis are employed to correctly diagnose VWD and its subtypes. However, data on VWF mutations among Southeast Asian populations are lacking. We, therefore, aimed to explore genetic variations in Thai patients with type 2 and type 3 VWD by whole exome sequencing (WES).

METHODS

In this multicentre study, Thai patients with type 2 and type 3 VWD, according to the definitions and VWF levels recommended by the international guidelines, were recruited. WES was performed using DNA extracted from peripheral blood in all cases. The novel variants were verified by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (73% females; median age at diagnosis 3.0 years) with type 2 (n=12) and type 3 VWD (n=3) from 14 families were enrolled. All patients harboured at least one VWF variant. Six missense (p.Arg1374Cys, p.Arg1374His, p.Arg1399Cys, p.Arg1597Trp, p.Ser1613Pro, p.Pro1648Arg) and one splice-site (c.3379+1G>A) variants in the VWF gene were formerly described. Notably, six VWF variants, including three missense (p.Met814Ile, p.Trp856Cys, p.Pro2032Leu), one deletion (c.2251delG) and two splice-site (c.7729+4A>C, c.8115+2delT) mutations were novelly identified. Compound heterozygosity contributed to type 2 and type 3 VWD phenotypes in two and one patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 and type 3 VWD in Thailand demonstrate the mutational variations among VWF exons/introns with several unique variants. The WES-based approach potentially provides helpful information to verify VWD diagnosis and facilitate genetic counselling in clinical practice.

Unravelling the spectrum of von Willebrand factor variants in quantitative von Willebrand disease: results from a German cohort study

BACKGROUND

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most prevalent hereditary bleeding disorder, results from deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF).

OBJECTIVES

This large cohort study aims to offer a comprehensive exploration of mutation spectra and laboratory features in quantitative VWF deficiencies, shedding light on genetic underpinnings and genotype-phenotype associations.

METHODS

Our cohort consisted of 221 Caucasian index patients with quantitative VWD, along with 47 individuals whose plasma VWF levels fell within the lower normal boundaries (50-70 IU/dL). We conducted comprehensive VWF assays and genetic analyses, encompassing VWF gene sequencing, copy number variation investigations, and bioinformatic assessments.

RESULTS

Following International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-Scientific and Standardization Committee VWF guidelines, 77 index patients were characterized as having type 1 VWD (VWF antigen [VWF:Ag] < 30 IU/dL), 111 as having type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag, 30-50 IU/dL), and 33 as having type 3 VWD. Mutation detection rates were 88%, 65%, and 92%, respectively. Notably, blood group O overrepresentation was evident in type 1 with VWF:Ag of 30 to 50 IU/dL, particularly among mutation-negative patients, suggesting a potential causal role of blood group O. A total of 223 VWF variants, comprising 147 distinct variations, were identified in quantitative VWD patients, of which 57 were novel variants (39%). Additionally, approximately 70% of individuals with VWF levels within the lower normal boundaries (50-70 IU/dL) displayed VWF variants.

CONCLUSION

Our data advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying quantitative VWD, offering valuable insights for future research and clinical management. Distinct mutation patterns were observed among subgroups, particularly the contrast between type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag < 30 IU/dL) and type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag, 30-50 IU/dL), an area with limited prior investigation.

Type 2N von Willebrand disease: genotype drives different bleeding phenotypes and treatment needs

BACKGROUND

Type 2 Normandy von Willebrand disease (VWD2N) is usually perceived as a mild bleeding disorder that can be treated with desmopressin (DDAVP). However, VWD2N patients can be compound heterozygous or homozygous for different variants, with p.Arg854Gln (R854Q) being the most frequent causative one. There are limited data about the impact of 2N variants on VWD2N phenotype and DDAVP response.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to describe the phenotype of VWD2N, including DDAVP response, according to genotype.

METHODS

VWD2N patients with a complete genotype/phenotype characterization by the French reference center for VWD, including MCMDM-1VWD bleeding score, were eligible to be included in the study. Results of the DDAVP trial were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 123 VWD2N patients from the French registry were included in this study. Results were stratified according to the presence (R854QPos, n = 114) or absence (R854QNeg, n = 9) of at least 1 R854Q allele. Three R854QPos subgroups were further individualized: patients homozygous (R854QHmz, n = 55), compound heterozygous for R854Q and a null allele (R854Q/3, n = 48), or compound heterozygous for R854Q and another 2N variant (R854Q/2N, n = 11).

FVIII

C levels were significantly lower in R854QNeg and R854Q/3 patients compared with R854QHmz ones (P < .001 and P < .0001, respectively). R854QNeg patients were diagnosed earlier due to bleeding symptoms and had a higher bleeding score than R854QPos patients (P < .001). In DDAVP trial, FVIII:C survival was lower in VWD type 2N than in type 1 patients. R854QPos patients had a heterogeneous DDAVP response, which was best predicted by baseline FVIII:C level.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneous genetic background of VWD2N drives different bleeding phenotypes and response patterns to DDAVP, underlining the clinical relevance of DDAVP trial to identify patients potentially eligible to alternative therapeutic options.

Application of genetic testing for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder, with an estimated symptomatic prevalence of 1 per 1000 in the general population. VWD is characterized by defects in the quantity, quality, or multimeric structure of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a glycoprotein being hemostatically essential in circulation. VWD is classified into 3 principal types: low VWF/type 1 with partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 with virtual absence of VWF, and type 2 with functional abnormalities of VWF, being classified as 2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N. A new VWD type has been officially recognized by the ISTH SSC on von Willebrand factor which has also been discussed by the joint ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH 2021 guidelines (ie, type 1C), indicating patients with quantitative deficiency due to an enhanced VWF clearance. With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the process of genetic diagnosis has substantially changed and improved accuracy. Therefore, nowadays, patients with type 3 and severe type 1 VWD can benefit from genetic testing as much as type 2 VWD. Specifically, genetic testing can be used to confirm or differentiate a VWD diagnosis, as well as to provide genetic counseling. The focus of this manuscript is to discuss the current knowledge on VWD molecular pathophysiology and the application of genetic testing for VWD diagnosis.

von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. The disorder is characterized by excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. The most common bleeding manifestations of this condition include nosebleeds, bruising, bleeding from minor wounds, menorrhagia or postpartum bleeding in women as well as bleeding after surgery. Other less frequent symptoms include gastrointestinal bleeding, haematomas or haemarthroses. VWD pathophysiology is complex and results from defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF) glycoprotein. Quantitative deficiencies are responsible for type 1 VWD with a partial decrease of VWF and type 3 with the complete absence of VWF. Qualitative abnormalities cause type 2 VWD, being further divided into types 2A, 2B, 2M and 2N. Although common, VWD is at risk of misdiagnosis, overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis owing to several factors, including complex diagnosis, variability of bleeding symptoms, presence of external variables (blood groups and other physiological modifiers such as exercise, thyroid hormones, oestrogens, and ageing), and lack of disease awareness among non-specialist health-care providers. Establishing the correct VWD diagnosis requires an array of specialized phenotypic assays and/or molecular genetic testing of the VWF gene. The management of bleeding includes increasing endogenous VWF levels with desmopressin or infusion of exogenous VWF concentrates (plasma-derived or recombinant). Fibrinolytic inhibitors, topical haemostatic agents and hormonal therapies are used as effective adjunctive measures.

Type 2M/2A von Willebrand disease: a shared phenotype between type 2M and 2A

ABSTRACT

Four variants have been continuously subjected to debate and received different von Willebrand disease (VWD) classifications: p.R1315L, p.R1315C, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C. We chose to comprehensively investigate these variants with full set of VWD tests, protein-modeling predictions and applying structural biology. Patients with p.R1315L, p.R1315C, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C were included. A group with type 2A and 2M was included to better understand similarities and differences. Patients were investigated for phenotypic assays and underlying disease mechanisms. We applied deep protein modeling predictions and structural biology to elucidate the causative effects of variants. Forty-three patients with these variants and 70 with 2A (n = 35) or 2M (n = 35) were studied. Patients with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, or p.R1374C showed a common phenotype between 2M and 2A using von Willebrand factor (VWF):GPIbR/VWF:Ag and VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratios and VWF multimeric profile, whereas p.R1315C represented a type 2M phenotype. There was an overall reduced VWF synthesis or secretion in 2M and cases with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C, but not in 2A. Reduced VWF survival was observed in most 2A (77%), 2M (80%), and all 40 cases with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C. These were the only variants that fall at the interface between the A1-A2 domains. p.R1315L/C mutants induce more compactness and internal mobility, whereas p.R1374H/C display a more extended overall geometry. We propose a new classification of type 2M/2A for p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C because they share a common phenotype with 2M and 2A. Our structural analysis shows the unique location of these variants on the A1-A2 domains and their distinctive effect on VWF.

The common VWF variant p.Y1584C: detailed pathogenic examination of an enigmatic sequence change

BACKGROUND

As knowledge of the human genome has advanced, so too has the recognition that interpretation of the pathogenic nature of sequence variants can be challenging. The von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene exhibits a significant degree of sequence variability, and the first VWF variant associated with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD), c.4751 A>G, p.Y1584C, was described in 2003. However, since that time, the pathogenic nature of this variant has remained unclear, being assigned properties ranging from a risk factor to a pathogenic variant.

OBJECTIVES

To provide additional evaluation on the interpretation of pathogenicity for this common VWF variant.

METHODS

Fifty-eight subjects with only the p.Y1584C variant were recruited from 2 cohort studies (the Zimmerman Program and the Canadian type 1 VWD study). Clinical and laboratory phenotypes were assessed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of the p.Y1584C variant in our cohorts was 23- to 27-fold higher than that in large normal population databases. Significantly more p.Y1584C subjects had an abnormal bleeding score when compared to Y1584 individuals. In comparison with a group of 35 subjects without the p.Y1584C variant, subjects with the variant had lower mean VWF:antigen and VWF:ristocetin cofactor values and significantly higher VWF propeptide/VWF:antigen ratios suggestive of enhanced clearance.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, the results of this analysis suggest that p.Y1584C is likely pathogenic, however, due to influences such as incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, and other genetic modifiers like ABO blood group, the straightforward assignment of pathogenicity to this variant is inevitably challenging.

A comparative study in patients with type 2 von Willebrand disease using 4 different platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor assays

Background

Several assays are now available to evaluate platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity.

Objective

To report the results obtained using 4 different assays in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) carrying variants mainly in the A1 domain, which is critical for VWF binding to glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) and ristocetin.

Methods

We evaluated 4 different assays, 2 gain-of-function mutant GPIb binding (VWF:GPIbM) and 2 ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assays, in 76 patients with type 2 VWD. Patients and healthy controls were tested using VWF:GPIbM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), VWF:GPIbM automated, VWF:RCo aggregometric, and VWF:RCo automated assays.

Results

There was a good correlation (Pearson's r>0.82) and agreement (Bland-Altman plots assessment) between the 4 assays, although several outliers existed among the type 2B without high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWM). The VWF activity/VWF:antigen ratios, calculated for each assay, were used to establish the percentage of a correct diagnosis of type 2 (ratio<0.60) in these patients: VWF:RCo aggregometric, 2A(100%), 2M(78%), 2M/2A(100%), 2B(68%); VWF:RCo automated, 2A(88%), 2M(89%), 2M/2A(100%), 2B(63%); VWF:GPIbM ELISA, 2A(96%), 2M(67%), 2M/2A(67%), 2B(0%); VWF:GPIbM automated, 2A(73%), 2M(44%), 2M/2A(75%), 2B(84%). In type 2B patients with HMWM, all assays gave a ratio ≥0.60.

Conclusion

The VWF:GPIbM-automated assay is the most effective to diagnose as type 2 the 2B variants, whereas the VWF:RCo assays are the most effective in detecting 2M and 2M/2A variants. The VWF:GPIbM ELISA greatly overestimates the activity of the type 2B patients lacking HMWM. In this study, the use of a VWF activity/VWF:antigen ratio cut-off of 0.70 halved the number of misdiagnosed patients.

Protein S gene mutation c.946C > T (p.R316C) contributed to ischemic stroke in a man with von Willebrand disease type 3 caused by two novel VWF gene mutations, c.2328delT (p.A778Lfs* 23) and c.6521G > T (p.C2174F)

The risk factors for a family with VWD presenting with an ischemic stroke (IS) were explored. FVIII activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), and protein S activity were measured. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed targeting F8, F9, VWF, PROC, and PROS1. Sanger sequencing validation was performed on family members. The proband and his sister both had low FVIII:C (1 IU/dL) and VWF:Ag (3 IU/dL) levels, confirming the diagnosis of type 3 VWD. His father had nearly normal levels of FVIII:C (58 IU/dL) and VWF:Ag (57 IU/dL). His daughter had type 1 VWD with decreased FVIII:C (46 IU/dL) and VWF:Ag (19 IU/dL). NGS identified a heterozygous VWF c.2328delT (p.A778Lfs*23) frame shift mutation only in the proband and his sister. Another VWF missense mutation, c.6521G > T (p.C2174F), was found heterozygous in all members studied. A PROS1 mutation, c.946C > T (p.R316C), previously reported to relate to ischemic stroke, was found heterozygous in the patient, his father, and his daughter. Only the proband and daughter have a slightly decreased plasma protein S level. This may be the first case with type 3 VWD with severe VWF/FVIII deficiency presented with ischemic stroke contributed to by a protein S defect.

Phenotypic and genetic characterizations of the Milan cohort of von Willebrand disease type 2

von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2 is caused by qualitative abnormalities of von Willebrand factor (VWF). This study aimed to determine the genotypic and phenotypic characterizations of a large VWD type 2 cohort from Milan. We included 321 patients (54% female) within 148 unrelated families from 1995 to 2021. Patients were fully characterized using laboratory phenotypic tests, and the genotypic diagnosis was confirmed by target genetic analysis using Sanger sequencing. Patients were diagnosed with type 2A (n = 98; 48 families), 2B (n = 85; 38 families), 2M (n = 112; 50 families), or 2N (n = 26; 12 families). Eighty-two unique VWF variants, including 8 novel variants, were found. The potential pathogenic effect of novel variants was assessed by in silico analysis. Most patients were heterozygous for a single variant (n = 259; 81%), whereas 37 cases (11%) had 2 variants (4 homozygous, 9 in trans, and 24 in cis). Twenty-five patients (8%) had ≥3 variants, mainly as a result of gene conversions. Among the 82 distinct variants identified, 5 different types, including missense (n = 64), gene conversion (n = 10), synonymous (n = 1), deletion (n = 4), and splice (n = 3), were observed. The results from this large cohort showed that VWD type 2 is invariably due to variants that do not prevent the synthesis of the protein, and a vast majority of patients (88%) had missense variants. Given the complexity of type 2 diagnosis and the necessity of performing several phenotypic tests, genetic analysis for patients suspected of having type 2 is beneficial to establish the correct diagnosis.

Importance of Genotyping in von Willebrand Disease to Elucidate Pathogenic Mechanisms and Variability in Phenotype

Genotyping is not routinely performed at diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Therefore, the association between genetic variants and pathogenic mechanism or the clinical and laboratory phenotype is unknown in most patients, especially in type 1 VWD. To investigate whether genotyping adds to a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms and variability in phenotype, we analyzed the VWF gene in 390 well-defined VWD patients, included in the WiN study. A VWF gene variant was found in 155 patients (61.5%) with type 1, 122 patients (98.4%) with type 2, and 14 patients (100%) with type 3 VWD. Forty-eight variants were novel. For each VWF gene variant, the pathogenic mechanisms associated with reduced VWF levels was investigated using the FVIII:C/VWF:Ag and VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratios. In type 1 VWD, reduced synthesis or secretion of VWF was most frequently found in patients with nonsense variants, frameshift variants, and deletions, whereas rapid clearance of VWF was mainly found in patients with missense variants. Furthermore, type 1 VWD patients with and without a VWF gene variant were clearly distinct in their clinical features such as age of diagnosis, laboratory phenotype, and bleeding phenotype. In type 2 VWD, 81% of variants were associated with an increased clearance of VWF. To conclude, we identified the pathogenic mechanisms associated with various VWF gene variants in type 1, 2, and 3 VWD patients. Additionally, major differences in the phenotype of type 1 VWD patients with and without a variant were observed, which may be of importance for clinical management.

Genetic Alterations, DNA Methylation, Alloantibodies and Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Type III von Willebrand Disease

Type III von Willebrand disease is present in the Punjab province of Pakistan along with other inherited bleeding disorders like hemophilia. Cousin marriages are very common in Pakistan so genetic studies help to establish protocols for screening, especially at the antenatal level. Factors behind the phenotypic variation of the severity of bleeding in type III vWD are largely unknown. The study was conducted to determine Mutations/genetic alterations in type III von Willebrand disease and also to determine the association of different mutations, methylation status, ITGA2B/B3 mutations and alloimmunization with the severity of type III vWD. After informed consent and detailed history of the patients, routine tests and DNA extraction from blood, mutational analysis was performed by Next Generation Sequencing on Ion Torrent PGM. DNA methylation status was also checked with the help of PCR. In our cohort, 55 cases were detected with pathogenic mutations. A total of 27 different mutations were identified in 55 solved cases; 16 (59.2%) were novel. The mean bleeding score in truncating mutations and essential splice site mutations was relatively higher than weak and strong missense mutations. The mean bleeding score showed insignificant variation for different DNA methylation statuses of the VWF gene at the cg23551979 CpG site. Mutations in exons 7,10, 25, 28, 31, 43, and intron 41 splice site account for 75% of the mutations.

Identification of von Willebrand factor D4 domain mutations in patients of Afro-Caribbean descent: In vitro characterization

Background

Von Willebrand disease was diagnosed in two Afro-Caribbean patients and sequencing of the VWF gene (VWF) revealed the presence of multiple variants located throughout the gene, including variants located in the D4 domain of VWF: p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5) in one patient and p.(Cys2216Phefs*9) in the other patient. Interestingly, D4 variants have not been studied often.

Objectives

Our goal was to characterize how the D4 variants p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5) and p.(Cys2216Phefs*9) influenced VWF biosynthesis/secretion and functions using in vitro assays.

Methods

Recombinant VWF (rVWF), mutant or wild-type, was produced via transient transfection of the human embryonic kidney cell line 293T. The use of different tags for the wild-type and the mutant allele allowed us to distinguish between the two forms when measuring VWF antigen in medium and cell lysates. Binding of rVWF to its ligands, collagen, factor VIII, ADAMTS13, and platelet receptors was also investigated.

Results

Homozygous expression of the p.(Cys2216Phefs*9)-rVWF mutation resulted in an almost complete intracellular retention of the protein. Heterozygous expression led to secretion of almost exclusively wild-type-rVWF, logically capable of normal interaction with the different ligands. In contrast, the p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5)-rVWF exhibited reduced binding to type III collagen and αIIbβ3 integrin compared to wild-type-rVWF.

Conclusions

We report two mutations of the D4 domains that induced combined qualitative and quantitative defects.

Desmopressin response depends on the presence and type of genetic variants in patients with type 1 and type 2 von Willebrand disease

All type 1 VWD patients without a VWF gene variant have a complete response to desmopressin.

In type 1 and type 2 VWD patients with a VWF gene variant, desmopressin response highly depends on the causative VWF gene variant.

Patients with type 1 and type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) can be treated with desmopressin. Although a previous study has shown that the location of the causative VWF gene variant is associated with desmopressin response in type 1 VWD, the association between variants in the VWF gene and desmopressin response is not yet fully understood. Our primary aim was to compare desmopressin response in type 1 VWD patients with and without a VWF gene variant. Secondly, we investigated whether desmopressin response depends on specific VWF gene variants in type 1 and type 2 VWD. We included 250 patients from the Willebrand in the Netherlands study: 72 type 1 without a VWF gene variant, 108 type 1 with a variant, 45 type 2A, 16 type 2M, and 9 type 2N patients. VWF gene was analyzed with ion semiconductor sequencing and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification. Complete response to desmopressin was observed in all type 1 VWD patients without a variant, 64.3% of type 1 patients with a variant, and 31.3% of type 2 patients (P < .001). Despite a large interindividual variability in desmopressin response, patients with the same variant had comparable desmopressin responses. For instance, in 6 type 1 patients with exon 4 to 5 deletion, mean VWF activity at 1 hour after desmopressin was 0.81 IU/mL, with a coefficient of variation of 22.9%. In conclusion, all type 1 VWD patients without a VWF gene variant respond to desmopressin. In type 1 and type 2 VWD patients with a VWF variant, desmopressin response highly depends on the VWF gene variants.

IX international curse of continuing formation in haemophilia and other congenital coagulopathies. The role of the Laboratory in coagulation disorders. Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder caused by quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). This protein far from simplicity constitutes a very complex molecular model, remaining unravelled yet many aspects of it, even though the VWF gene (VWF) was cloned already in 1985 and the structure of VWF well defined. VWD diagnosis is difficult to achieve in a significant proportion of patients due to both disease heterogeneity and limitations in existing test processes. The cornerstone of diagnosis relies on interpretation of VWF test results, the presence of clinical manifestations of bleeding, especially mucocutaneous, and (in most cases) a positive family history. However, even with a significant bleeding history, a family history may not be positive due to factors of incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity that affect genetic changes. The laboratory diagnosis of VWD can be difficult, as the disease is heterogeneous and an array of assays is required to describe the phenotype. Basic classification of quantitative (type 1 and 3) and qualitative (type 2 variants) VWD requires determination of VWF antigenic (VWF:Ag) levels and assaying of VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity. The latter is required for identifying and subtyping VWD, but the assay is poorly standardized. For that reason, novel VWF activity assays have been developed awaiting more extensive comparison data between different methodologies and requiring validation on larger patient series. The qualitative type 2 VWF deficiency can be further divided into four different subtypes (A, B, M and N) using specific assays that measure other activities or the size distribution of VWF multimers. However, frequently, it may be difficult to correctly classify the VWD phenotype, and genetic analysis is through mutation identification may provide a tool to clarify the disorder.

The role of genetics in the diagnosis and treatment of haemorrhagic diathesis: a historical perspective

The rapid development of genetic studies, not only in haemophilia but also in other congenital coagulopathies and platelet-related alterations, has been made possible by massive sequencing (e.g. next-generation sequencing or NGS), which allows a rapid and automatic analysis of the whole gene, simultaneous study of several genes and multiple individuals, detection of genetic variants and the possibility to create personalized panels [16]. The new technologies have also changed the way results are evaluated. Currently, our interest goes beyond the study of carriers, extending to the relationship between the mutation and the risk of developing an inhibitor and the latter's role in the classification of diseases [17]. There is also great interest in understanding the genotype/phenotype relationship, analytical discrepancies and variations in the response to treatment [18].

Type 2N VWD: Conclusions from the Spanish PCM-EVW-ES project

INTRODUCTION

Type 2N von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a decreased affinity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) for factor VIII (FVIII). Abnormal binding of FVIII to VWF (VWF:FVIIIB), results in low FVIII plasma levels, which can lead to a misdiagnosis of mild haemophilia A. Accurate diagnosis of type 2N VWD is essential for appropriate genetic counselling and therapy. This disease can be distinguished from haemophilia A by in vitro assays (measurement VWF:FVIIIB activity) and/or genetic analysis.

AIM

To identify the current challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of this type of VWD and provide an in-depth description of the phenotypes and mutations identified.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients had at least one type 2N mutation, and 13 of these had a type 2N mutation combined with other variations. Three type 2N mutations were detected: p.Arg816Trp, p.Arg854Gln, and p.Arg763Ser. Two of these are the most frequently described mutations worldwide. This mutational spectrum differs from the broad spectrum seen in neighbouring France, where at least eight distinct 2N mutations have been found. In the PCM-EVW-ES cohort, 11 asymptomatic type 2N carriers with borderline FVIII plasma levels would probably have been excluded if the evaluation had been based on clinical and laboratory data only. Likewise, three patients with a severe phenotype would have been classified as homozygous for a 2N mutation if only the phenotype study had been performed.

CONCLUSION

The high detection yield and affordability of next-generation sequencing support the use of this technology as a first-line diagnostic tool in this setting.

ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

BACKGROUND

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis presents numerous challenges.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about VWD diagnosis.

METHODS

ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH established a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 4 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) supported the guideline-development process, including performing or updating systematic evidence reviews up to 8 January 2020. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subsequently subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 11 recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Key recommendations of these guidelines include the role of bleeding-assessment tools in the assessment of patients suspected of VWD, diagnostic assays and laboratory cutoffs for type 1 and type 2 VWD, how to approach a type 1 VWD patient with normalized levels over time, and the role of genetic testing vs phenotypic assays for types 2B and 2N. Future critical research priorities are also identified.

Resolving Differential Diagnostic Problems in von Willebrand Disease, in Fibrinogen Disorders, in Prekallikrein Deficiency and in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia by Next-Generation Sequencing

Diagnosis of rare bleeding disorders is challenging and there are several differential diagnostics issues. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a useful tool to overcome these problems. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of molecular genetic investigations by summarizing the diagnostic work on cases with certain bleeding disorders. Here we report only those, in whom NGS was indicated due to uncertainty of diagnosis or if genetic confirmation of initial diagnosis was required. Based on clinical and/or laboratory suspicion of von Willebrand disease (vWD, n = 63), hypo-or dysfibrinogenemia (n = 27), hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, n = 10) and unexplained activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) prolongation (n = 1), NGS using Illumina platform was performed. Gene panel covered 14 genes (ACVRL1, ENG, MADH4, GDF2, RASA1, F5, F8, FGA, FGB, FGG, KLKB1, ADAMTS13, GP1BA and VWF) selected on the basis of laboratory results. We identified forty-seven mutations, n = 29 (6 novel) in vWD, n = 4 mutations leading to hemophilia A, n = 10 (2 novel) in fibrinogen disorders, n = 2 novel mutations in HHT phenotype and two mutations (1 novel) leading to prekallikrein deficiency. By reporting well-characterized cases using standardized, advanced laboratory methods we add new pieces of data to the continuously developing “bleeding disorders databases”, which are excellent supports for clinical patient management.

Diagnostic challenges in von Willebrand disease. Report of two cases with emphasis on multimeric and molecular analysis

Identification of qualitative variants of von Willebrand disease (VWD) can be a diagnostic challenge because of discrepant results obtained in the multiple laboratory tests available for its appropriate classification. We report two cases of infrequent inherited variants of VWD with unclear preliminary results with the test panel available at the time of first consultation and that were finally diagnosed as a VWD type 2A/IID with a c.8318 G > C, p.Cys2773Ser mutation and a VWD type 2M with c.4225 T > G, p.Val1409Phe mutation, respectively. The description of these two cases highlights that despite the limited diagnostic panel for the evaluation of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) functionality, the multimeric analysis and genetic family studies were fundamental tools to achieve the final diagnosis.

Two cases of von Willebrand disease type 3 in consanguineous Chinese families

BACKGROUND

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder caused by defective or deficient von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD type 3 is inherited in autosomal recessive manner. We described clinical and molecular features of VWD type 3 in two consanguineous marriage families.

METHODS

Peripheral blood was collected, PT, APTT, FVIII:C, VWF:RCo, VWF:Ag were measured. A targeted next-generation sequencing panel covering F8, F9, and VWF genes was applied followed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Both families had a baby die in their first year due to bleeding disorders. A 23-year-old female patient from family A suffered menorrhagia, and another 30-year-old male patient from family B was characterized with hematoma in the lower extremity. Both patients showed severely decreased FVIII:C, VWF:Ag. Recurrent homozygous VWF c.4696C>T (p.Arg1566Ter) nonsense mutation was identified in the female patient, and novel homozygous VWF c.6450C>A (p.Cys2150Ter) nonsense mutation was identified the male patient. Heterozygotes in family members showed mild/moderate decrease in VWF:Ag or VWF:RCo.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified VWD type 3 in two consanguineous marriage families, and our work further strengthen the risk of delivering disorders inherited in AR manner in populations with frequent consanguineous partnerships.

Updated overview on von Willebrand disease: focus on the interest of genotyping

Introduction: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, characterized by a quantitative or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a multimeric glycoprotein crucial for primary hemostasis and coagulation. VWD pathophysiology is heterogeneous as it includes several types and subtypes which therapeutic management is different. The mainstays of VWD treatment are desmopressin and replacement therapy based on both plasma-derived concentrates and a recently developed recombinant VWF. VWD definitive diagnosis is achieved by a battery of phenotypic biologic assays and genotyping is currently performed mostly for research.Areas covered: This narrative review will firstly present a general overview on VWD epidemiology, pathophysiology, classification, clinics, phenotypic biologic diagnosis, and treatment. Secondly, a focus on VWD genotyping will be presented with specific emphasis on the evolution of its technical aspects, its applications for research dedicated to a better understanding of VWD pathophysiology and epidemiology and its interest in both a faster diagnosis and an optimal treatment of VWD.Expert opinion: Based on analysis of the literature, it can be concluded that the fast evolution of genetic techniques together with the development of innovating treatments may significantly change diagnostic flow charts for VWD and their use for specific and personalized treatment.

The role of genetics in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of type 1 Von Willebrand disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder, but diagnosis of VWD is challenging, particularly with type 1 VWD. Although most clinicians use specific tests of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity to classify patients with VWD, genetic testing for VWF defects is another potential method of diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies of patients with type 1 VWD report consistently that many, but not all, study participants have VWF gene defects. Certain populations, including those with VWF levels less than 30 IU/dl and those with clearance defects, are more likely to have a VWF sequence variant. In addition, a number of loci outside the VWF gene have been shown to affect VWF levels, including ABO, CLEC4M, STXBP5, and STAB2.

SUMMARY

Genetic defects in VWF are common, but not all defects lead to disease. Type 1 VWD in particular does not always have an associated VWF sequence variant. New data stemming from genome-wide association studies on modifier genes suggest that the etiology of type 1 VWD is multifactorial.

When age is truly only a number: late diagnosis of von Willebrand disease type 2B in a 61-year-old woman

: von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2B is a rare bleeding disorder, presenting with moderate-to-severe lifelong bleeding. We present the case of a 61-year-old woman who was misdiagnosed as immune thrombocytopenic purpura during her three pregnancies resulting in a delayed diagnosis of VWD type 2B. This genetically confirmed diagnosis resulted in testing and the establishment of the diagnosis in her otherwise asymptomatic adult son as well. VWD may not be diagnosed till beyond mid adulthood in women with thrombocytopenia previously attributed to pregnancy and should be considered as a differential in female patients developing thrombocytopenia less than 100 × 10/μl with an increased bleeding assessment tool score.

Targeted re-sequencing of F8, F9 and VWF: Characterization of Ion Torrent data and clinical implications for mutation screening

Mutations are not identified in ~5% of hemophilia A and 10–35% of type 1 VWD patients. The bleeding tendency also varies among patients carrying the same causative mutation, potentially indicating variants in additional genes modifying the phenotype that cannot be identified by routine single-gene analysis. The F8, F9 and VWF genes were analyzed in parallel using an AmpliSeq strategy and Ion Torrent sequencing. Targeting all exonic positions showed an average read depth of >2000X and coverage close to 100% in 24 male patients with known disease-causing mutations. Discrimination between reference alleles and alternative/indel alleles was adequate at a 25% frequency threshold. In F8, F9 and VWF there was an absolute majority of all reference alleles at allele frequencies >95% and the average alternative allele and indel frequencies never reached above 10% and 15%, respectively. In VWF, 4–5 regions showed lower reference allele frequencies; in two regions covered by the pseudogene close to the 25% cut-off for reference alleles. All known mutations, including indels, gross deletions and substitutions, were identified. Additional VWF variants were identified in three hemophilia patients. The presence of additional mutations in 2 out of 16 (12%) randomly selected hemophilia patients indicates a potential mutational contribution that may affect the disease phenotype and counseling in these patients. Parallel identification of disease-causing mutations in all three genes not only confirms the deficiency, but differentiates phenotypic overlaps and allows for correct genetic counseling.

Unraveling the effect of silent, intronic and missense mutations on VWF splicing: contribution of next generation sequencing in the study of mRNA

Large studies in von Willebrand disease patients, including Spanish and Portuguese registries, led to the identification of >250 different mutations. It is a challenge to determine the pathogenic effect of potential splice site mutations on VWF mRNA. This study aimed to elucidate the true effects of 18 mutations on VWF mRNA processing, investigate the contribution of next-generation sequencing to in vivo mRNA study in von Willebrand disease, and compare the findings with in silico prediction. RNA extracted from patient platelets and leukocytes was amplified by RT-PCR and sequenced using Sanger and next generation sequencing techniques. Eight mutations affected VWF splicing: c.1533+1G>A, c.5664+2T>C and c.546G>A (p.=) prompted exon skipping; c.3223-7_3236dup and c.7082-2A>G resulted in activation of cryptic sites; c.3379+1G>A and c.7437G>A) demonstrated both molecular pathogenic mechanisms simultaneously; and the p.Cys370Tyr missense mutation generated two aberrant transcripts. Of note, the complete effect of three mutations was provided by next generation sequencing alone because of low expression of the aberrant transcripts. In the remaining 10 mutations, no effect was elucidated in the experiments. However, the differential findings obtained in platelets and leukocytes provided substantial evidence that four of these would have an effect on VWF levels. In this first report using next generation sequencing technology to unravel the effects of VWF mutations on splicing, the technique yielded valuable information. Our data bring to light the importance of studying the effect of synonymous and missense mutations on VWF splicing to improve the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms behind von Willebrand disease. clinicaltrials.gov identifier:02869074.

Role of multimeric analysis of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) diagnosis: Lessons from the PCM-EVW-ES Spanish project

The multimeric analysis (MA) of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) evaluates structural integrity and helps in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). This assay is a matter of controversy, being considered by some investigators cumbersome and only slightly informative. The centralised study ‘Molecular and Clinical Profile of von Willebrand Disease in Spain (PCM-EVW-ES)’ has been carried out by including the phenotypic assessment and the genetic analysis by next generation sequencing (NGS) of the VWF gene (VWF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of MA to the diagnosis of these patients and their potential discrepancies. Two hundred and seventy out of 480 patients centrally diagnosed with VWD had normal multimers, 168 had abnormal multimers and 42 a total absence of multimers. VWF MA was of great significance in the diagnosis of 83 patients (17.3%), it was also of help in the diagnosis achieved in 365 additional patients (76%) and was not informative in 32 cases (6.7%). With regard to discrepancies, 110 out of 480 (23%) patients centrally diagnosed with VWD presented some kind of discordance between VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag and/or VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratios, multimeric study and/or genetic results. The VWF MA was key in the presence of novel mutations as well as in cases with phenotypic discrepancies. A comparison between the contribution of MA and VWF:CB showed a clearly higher contribution of the former in the diagnostic process. These data seem to reinforce the relevance of the VWF MA in VWD diagnosis, despite all its limitations.