Update on current treatments for adult acute myeloid leukemia: to treat acute myeloid leukemia intensively or non-intensively? That is the question

Randomized phase III GnG study on two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Not available.

The opportunities and challenges of using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for leukemia treatment

Leukemia poses a significant clinical challenge due to its swift onset, rapid progression, and treatment-related complications. Tumor immune evasion, facilitated by immune checkpoints like programmed death receptor 1/programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1), plays a critical role in leukemia pathogenesis and progression. In this review, we summarized the research progress and therapeutic potential of PD-L1 in leukemia, focusing on targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated promising outcomes with PD-L1 inhibitors, highlighting their role in enhancing treatment efficacy. This review discusses the implications of PD-L1 expression levels on treatment response and long-term survival rates in leukemia patients. Furthermore, we address the challenges and opportunities in immunotherapy, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches and combination therapies to optimize PD-L1 inhibition in leukemia management. Future research prospects include exploring novel treatment strategies and addressing immune-related adverse events to improve clinical outcomes in leukemia. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the role of PD-L1 in leukemia and its potential as a therapeutic target in the evolving landscape of leukemia treatment.

Home time among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia by therapy intensity

Not available.

AXL-specific single domain antibodies show diagnostic potential and anti-tumor activity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Rationale: AXL expression has been identified as a prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is detectable in approximately 50% of AML patients. In this study, we developed AXL-specific single domain antibodies (sdAbs), cross-reactive for both mouse and human AXL protein, to non-invasively image and treat AXL-expressing cancer cells. Methods: AXL-specific sdAbs were induced by immunizing an alpaca with mouse and human AXL proteins. SdAbs were characterized using ELISA, flow cytometry, surface plasmon resonance and the AlphaFold2 software. A lead compound was selected and labeled with 99mTc for evaluation as a diagnostic tool in mouse models of human (THP-1 cells) or mouse (C1498 cells) AML using SPECT/CT imaging. For therapeutic purposes, the lead compound was fused to a mouse IgG2a-Fc tail and in vitro functionality tests were performed including viability, apoptosis and proliferation assays in human AML cell lines and primary patient samples. Using these in vitro models, its anti-tumor effect was evaluated as a single agent, and in combination with standard of care agents venetoclax or cytarabine. Results: Based on its cell binding potential, cross-reactivity, nanomolar affinity and GAS6/AXL blocking capacity, we selected sdAb20 for further evaluation. Using SPECT/CT imaging, we observed tumor uptake of 99mTc-sdAb20 in mice with AXL-positive THP-1 or C1498 tumors. In THP-1 xenografts, an optimized protocol using pre-injection of cold sdAb20-Fc was required to maximize the tumor-to-background signal. Besides its diagnostic value, we observed a significant reduction in tumor cell proliferation and viability using sdAb20-Fc in vitro. Moreover, combining sdAb20-Fc and cytarabine synergistically induced apoptosis in human AML cell lines, while these effects were less clear when combined with venetoclax. Conclusions: Because of their diagnostic potential, sdAbs could be used to screen patients eligible for AXL-targeted therapy and to follow-up AXL expression during treatment and disease progression. When fused to an Fc-domain, sdAbs acquire additional therapeutic properties that can lead to a multidrug approach for the treatment of AXL-positive cancer patients.

Phosphoproteomic Characterization and Kinase Signature Predict Response to Venetoclax Plus 3+7 Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Resistance to chemotherapy remains a formidable obstacle in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapeutic management, necessitating the exploration of optimal strategies to maximize therapeutic benefits. Venetoclax with 3+7 daunorubicin and cytarabine (DAV regimen) in young adult de novo AML patients is evaluated. 90% of treated patients achieved complete remission, underscoring the potential of this regimen as a compelling therapeutic intervention. To elucidate underlying mechanisms governing response to DAV in AML, quantitative phosphoproteomics to discern distinct molecular signatures characterizing a subset of DAV-sensitive patients is used. Cluster analysis reveals an enrichment of phosphoproteins implicated in chromatin organization and RNA processing within DAV-susceptible and DA-resistant AML patients. Furthermore, kinase activity profiling identifies AURKB as a candidate indicator of DAV regimen efficacy in DA-resistant AML due to AURKB activation. Intriguingly, AML cells overexpressing AURKB exhibit attenuated MCL-1 expression, rendering them receptive to DAV treatment and maintaining them resistant to DA treatment. Moreover, the dataset delineates a shared kinase, AKT1, associated with DAV response. Notably, AKT1 inhibition augments the antileukemic efficacy of DAV treatment in AML. Overall, this phosphoproteomic study identifies the role of AURKB as a predictive biomarker for DA, but not DAV, resistance and proposes a promising strategy to counteract therapy resistance in AML.

Understanding differential technologies for detection of MRD and how to incorporate into clinical practice

Patient- and leukemia-specific factors assessed at diagnosis classify patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in risk categories that are prognostic for outcome. The induction phase with intensive chemotherapy in fit patients aims to reach a complete remission (CR) of less than 5% blasts in bone marrow by morphology. To deepen and sustain the response, induction is followed by consolidation treatment. This postremission treatment of patients with AML is graduated in intensity based on this favorable, intermediate, or adverse risk group classification as defined in the European Leukemia Network (ELN) 2022 recommendations. The increment of evidence that measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction can be superimposed on risk group at diagnosis is instrumental in tailoring further treatment accordingly. Several techniques are applied to detect MRD such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative (digital) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing. The clinical implementation of MRD and the technique used differ among institutes, leading to the accumulation of a wide range of data, and therefore harmonization is warranted. Currently, evidence for MRD guidance is limited to the time point after induction using MFC or quantitative PCR for NPM1 and core binding factor abnormalities in intermediate-risk patients. The role of MRD in targeted or nonintensive therapies needs to be clarified, although some data show improved survival in patients achieving CR-MRD negativity. Potential application of MRD for selection of conditioning before stem cell transplantation, monitoring after consolidation, and use as an intermediate end point in clinical trials need further evaluation.

Effective Prognostic Model for Therapy Response Prediction in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematopoietic disorder characterized by the malignant transformation of bone marrow-derived myeloid progenitor cells with extremely short survival. To select the optimal treatment options and predict the response to therapy, the stratification of AML patients into risk groups based on genetic factors along with clinical characteristics is carried out. Despite this thorough approach, the therapy response and disease outcome for a particular patient with AML depends on several patient- and tumor-associated factors. Among these, tumor cell resistance to chemotherapeutic agents represents one of the main obstacles for improving survival outcomes in AML patients. In our study, a new prognostic scale for the risk stratification of AML patients based on the detection of the sensitivity or resistance of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs in vitro as well as MDR1 mRNA/P-glycoprotein expression, tumor origin (primary or secondary), cytogenetic abnormalities, and aberrant immunophenotype was developed. This study included 53 patients diagnosed with AML. Patients who received intensive or non-intensive induction therapy were analyzed separately. Using correlation, ROC, and Cox regression analyses, we show that the risk stratification of AML patients in accordance with the developed prognostic scale correlates well with the response to therapy and represents an independent predictive factor for the overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed AML.