Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab as first-line treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A long-term analysis of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) registry

Long-term data of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with favorable risk who were treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) within clinical trials show good efficacy. We here report long-term data collected within the GCLLSG registry. Altogether, 417 CLL patients who received first-line treatment with FCR were analyzed, of which 293 (70.3%) were treated outside of clinical trials. The median observation time from first-line was 95.8 (interquartile range 58.7-126.8) months. Focusing on data of 194 (46.5%) patients who received FCR first-line treatment after 2013 (start of data collection within GCLLSG registry), responses were documented in 85% of the patients, non-responses in 15%, and for 3.6% the assessment was missing. Median event-free survival (EFS, time until disease progression, subsequent treatment, or death) was 60.2 months with a 5-year EFS-rate of 50.6%. Patients with higher-risk disease, characterized by unmutated IGHV (N = 78), had a median EFS of 45.4 months with a 5-year EFS rate of 36.3%, while the median EFS was 77.5 months with a 5-year EFS rate of 60.3% in patients with mutated IGHV (N = 40). Median overall survival was not reached with a 5-year survival rate of 92.7%. In summary, first-line FCR was associated with long EFS, especially in patients exhibiting a mutated IGHV status.

Randomized phase III GnG study on two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and double-blinded intensive post-remission therapy with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Not available.

Tislelizumab plus zanubrutinib for Richter transformation: the phase 2 RT1 trial

In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Richter transformation (RT) reflects the development of an aggressive lymphoma that is associated with poor response to chemotherapy and short survival. We initiated an international, investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label phase 2 study in which patients with RT received a combination of the PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab plus the BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib for 12 cycles. Patients responding to treatment underwent maintenance treatment with both agents. The primary end point was overall response rate after six cycles. Of 59 enrolled patients, 48 patients received at least two cycles of treatment and comprised the analysis population according to the study protocol. The median observation time was 13.9 months, the median age was 67 (range 45-82) years. Ten patients (20.8%) had received previous RT-directed therapy. In total, 28 out of 48 patients responded to induction therapy with an overall response rate of 58.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 43.2-72.4), including 9 (18.8%) complete reponse and 19 (39.6%) partial response, meeting the study's primary end point by rejecting the predefined null hypothesis of 40% (P = 0.008). Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival. The median duration of response was not reached, the median progression-free survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 3.8-16.3). Median overall survival was not reached with a 12-month overall survival rate of 74.7% (95% CI 58.4-91.0). The most common adverse events were infections (18.0%), gastrointestinal disorders (13.0%) and hematological toxicities (11.4%). These data suggest that combined checkpoint and BTK inhibition by tislelizumab plus zanubrutinib is an effective and well-tolerated treatment strategy for patients with RT. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271956 .

High karyotypic complexity is an independent prognostic factor in patients with CLL treated with venetoclax combinations

Complex karyotypes have been associated with inferior outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), whereas their prognostic impact in the context of venetoclax-based treatments is still debated. In this prospective analysis on karyotype complexity in CLL, we evaluated the impact of complex (≥3 chromosomal aberrations [CAs], CKTs) and highly complex karyotypes (≥5 CAs; hCKTs) as well as specific aberrations in previously untreated patients without TP53 aberrations undergoing either CIT or time-limited venetoclax-based therapies in the phase 3 GAIA/CLL13 trial. Karyotype analyses were available for 895 of 926 patients (96.7%), of whom 153 (17%) had a CKT and 43 (5%) hCKT. In the CIT arm, CKT was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.58; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.54-4.32; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.03-10.26; P = .044). In the pooled venetoclax arms, a multivariable analysis identified hCKTs (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.03-3.72; P = .041), but not CKTs, as independent adverse prognosticators for PFS. The presence of translocations (unbalanced and/or balanced) was also independently associated with shorter PFSs in the venetoclax arms. CIT led to the acquisition of additional CAs (mean CAs, 2.0-3.4; from baseline to CLL progression), whereas karyotype complexity remained stable after venetoclax-based treatments (2.0, both time points). This analysis establishes highly complex karyotypes and translocations as adverse prognostic factors in the context of venetoclax-based combination treatments. The findings of this study support the incorporation of karyotyping into the standard diagnostic workup of CLL, because it identifies patients at high risk of poor treatment outcomes and thereby improves prognostication. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02950051.

Radiation and Dose-densification of R-CHOP in Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma With Intermediate Prognosis: The UNFOLDER Study

UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18-60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19).

First-Line Venetoclax Combinations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials of venetoclax plus anti-CD20 antibodies as first-line treatment in fit patients (i.e., those with a low burden of coexisting conditions) with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been lacking.

METHODS

In a phase 3, open-label trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, fit patients with CLL who did not have TP53 aberrations to receive six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab or bendamustine-rituximab) or 12 cycles of venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. Ibrutinib was discontinued after two consecutive measurements of undetectable minimal residual disease or could be extended. The primary end points were undetectable minimal residual disease (sensitivity, <10^-4 [i.e., <1 CLL cell in 10,000 leukocytes]) as assessed by flow cytometry in peripheral blood at month 15 and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 926 patients were assigned to one of the four treatment regimens (229 to chemoimmunotherapy, 237 to venetoclax-rituximab, 229 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab, and 231 to venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib). At month 15, the percentage of patients with undetectable minimal residual disease was significantly higher in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group (86.5%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 80.6 to 91.1) and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (92.2%; 97.5% CI, 87.3 to 95.7) than in the chemoimmunotherapy group (52.0%; 97.5% CI, 44.4 to 59.5; P<0.001 for both comparisons), but it was not significantly higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group (57.0%; 97.5% CI, 49.5 to 64.2; P = 0.32). Three-year progression-free survival was 90.5% in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group and 75.5% in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.32; 97.5% CI, 0.19 to 0.54; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 3 years was also higher with venetoclax-obinutuzumab (87.7%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 97.5% CI, 0.26 to 0.68; P<0.001), but not with venetoclax-rituximab (80.8%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 97.5% CI, 0.53 to 1.18; P = 0.18). Grade 3 and grade 4 infections were more common with chemoimmunotherapy (18.5%) and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib (21.2%) than with venetoclax-rituximab (10.5%) or venetoclax-obinutuzumab (13.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Venetoclax-obinutuzumab with or without ibrutinib was superior to chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment in fit patients with CLL. (Funded by AbbVie and others; GAIA-CLL13 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02950051; EudraCT number, 2015-004936-36.).

Afatinib as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in routine clinical practice

Background:

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in Germany and worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises ~80% of lung cancer diagnoses; in White patients, around 10% of NSCLC cases are epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+). Head-to-head clinical trials have demonstrated superior efficacy with second-/third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) versus first-generation EGFR TKIs in EGFRm+ NSCLC. Data from routine clinical practice are necessary to confirm that clinical trial findings are transferable to real-world populations.

Methods:

In NCT02047903, a prospective non-interventional study in Germany, patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC received first-line afatinib until disease progression or intolerable adverse events. Key objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months, objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Safety/tolerability was also assessed.

Results:

Of 152 patients, 106 (69.7%) were female, 20 (13.1%) patients had an uncommon EGFR mutation and 51 patients (33.6%) had brain metastases. A starting dose of <40 mg was received by 39 (25.7%) patients. Overall, the 12-month PFS rate was 50.2% while the median PFS was 12.2 months. The ORR was 74.6% and the median OS was 30.4 months. In patients with brain metastases and uncommon mutations, the median PFS was 10.5 and 10.7 months, and the ORR was 77.3% and 83.3%, respectively. Treatment effectiveness was similar in patients with a starting dose of <40 mg (median PFS: 16.4 months; ORR, 81.3%) and a starting dose of 40 mg (median PFS: 10.8 months; ORR, 72.1%). Adverse drug reactions were manageable and consistent with the known afatinib safety profile.

Conclusion:

The results support clinical trial data for afatinib in routine clinical practice, including in patients generally excluded from clinical trials. Outcomes were positive in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations and in those with brain metastases. Treatment benefit was also seen in patients receiving a <40 mg afatinib starting dose, supporting patient-tailored dosing.

Efficacy of afatinib in the clinical practice: Final results of the GIDEON study in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Germany

e21636

Background: Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family blocker, which is approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutations. Here we report the final results of the prospective non-interventional study (NIS) GIDEON, which was initiated to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of afatinib in the daily clinical routine in Germany. Methods: EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients were treated with afatinib according to label until progression, death or discontinuation. Efficacy (progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months, objective response rate, ORR; disease control rate, DCR; progression-free survival, PFS and overall survival, OS) was prospectively assessed by investigators. Data about tolerability were collected during routine treatment. Results: In total, 161 patients were enrolled at 41 sites in Germany, 152 patients received at least one dose of afatinib (treated set; TS) and 146 patients were treated according to the protocol (PPS). The majority of patients for the entire TS had exon 19 deletions (64.5%), followed by L858R point mut. (22.4%) and uncommon mut. (exon 18-21 point mut.; 13.1%). The primary objective was PFS-rate at 12 months, which was 50.2% in the PPS. Median PFS amounted to 12.2 months. ORR and DCR were 74.6% and 91.5% in the PPS, respectively. Median OS was 30.4 months with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 79.1% and 57.7%, respectively. Among pat. with uncommon EGFR-mut., the 12-months PFS rate was 40.2% with a mPFS of 10.7 months. ORR and DCR were 83.3% and 91.7%, respectively. The most frequent documented adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were diarrhea and rash/acne with 13.8% and 7.2% of grade 3 but no grade 4 or higher. Conclusions: Afatinib is a standard therapy for patients with activating EGFR mut. in Germany. The final results of this prospective NIS confirm the robust clinical data for afatinib in the clinical routine setting, including patients with uncommon exon 18-21 point mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT02047903.

Sequential high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (S-HAM) versus standard double induction in acute myeloid leukemia-a phase 3 study

Dose-dense induction with the S-HAM regimen was compared to standard double induction therapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) between S-HAM (2nd chemotherapy cycle starting on day 8 = “dose-dense”) and double induction with TAD-HAM or HAM(-HAM) (2nd cycle starting on day 21 = “standard”). 387 evaluable patients were randomly assigned to S-HAM (N = 203) and to standard double induction (N = 184). The primary endpoint overall response rate (ORR) consisting of complete remission (CR) and incomplete remission (CR_i) was not significantly different (P = 0.202) between S-HAM (77%) and double induction (72%). The median overall survival was 35 months after S-HAM and 25 months after double induction (P = 0.323). Duration of critical leukopenia was significantly reduced after S-HAM (median 29 days) versus double induction (median 44 days)—P < 0.001. This translated into a significantly shortened duration of hospitalization after S-HAM (median 37 days) as compared to standard induction (median 49 days)—P < 0.001. In conclusion, dose-dense induction therapy with the S-HAM regimen shows favorable trends but no significant differences in ORR and OS compared to standard double induction. S-HAM significantly shortens critical leukopenia and the duration of hospitalization by 2 weeks.

Der Einfluß von Cisaprid und Metoclopramid auf die Bioverfügbarkeit von Phenprocoumon

Je 12 Probanden erhielten Phenprocoumon oral als Einmalgabe bei laufender Cisaprid- bzw. Metoclopramideinnahme und in der Kontrollphase ohne Gastrokinetika. Mehrere Gerinnungsparameter, der Plasmaspiegel und die Urinausscheidung von Phenprocoumon wurden bis zum 7. Tag nach der Einnahme bestimmt.

Metoclopramid reduzierte die Fläche unter der Plasmaspiegel-Zeitkurve und die Halbwertszeit von Phenprocoumon signifikant, zeigte aber keinen Einfluß auf die Plasmaspiegelspitzenwerte oder die Anflutungsgeschwindigkeit. Diese Befunde sprechen für eine beschleunigte Elimination durch Metoclopramid. Allerdings fanden sich, bis auf eine geringe Reduktion der Faktor-X-Aktivität, keine signifikanten Veränderungen der Gerinnungsparameter während der Metoclopramideinnahme. Unter der Cisaprideinnahme veränderten sich weder die Blutgerinnungsparameter noch die pharmakokinetischen Daten.

Erhebliche intra- und interindividuelle Schwankungen der Meßdaten lassen jedoch engmaschige Quickwertkontrollen bei Koadministration von Phenprocoumon und Gastrokinetika anraten.

Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (PETAL): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial

Purpose Interim positron emission tomography (PET) using the tracer, [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose, may predict outcomes in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. We assessed whether PET can guide therapy in patients who are treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). Patients and Methods Newly diagnosed patients received two cycles of CHOP-plus rituximab (R-CHOP) in CD20-positive lymphomas-followed by a PET scan that was evaluated using the ΔSUV_max method. PET-positive patients were randomly assigned to receive six additional cycles of R-CHOP or six blocks of an intensive Burkitt's lymphoma protocol. PET-negative patients with CD20-positive lymphomas were randomly assigned or allocated to receive four additional cycles of R-CHOP or the same treatment with two additional doses rituximab. The primary end point was event-free survival time as assessed by log-rank test. Results Interim PET was positive in 108 (12.5%) and negative in 754 (87.5%) of 862 patients treated, with statistically significant differences in event-free survival and overall survival. Among PET-positive patients, 52 were randomly assigned to R-CHOP and 56 to the Burkitt protocol, with 2-year event-free survival rates of 42.0% (95% CI, 28.2% to 55.2%) and 31.6% (95% CI, 19.3% to 44.6%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.501 [95% CI, 0.896 to 2.514]; P = .1229). The Burkitt protocol produced significantly more toxicity. Of 754 PET-negative patients, 255 underwent random assignment (129 to R-CHOP and 126 to R-CHOP with additional rituximab). Event-free survival rates were 76.4% (95% CI, 68.0% to 82.8%) and 73.5% (95% CI, 64.8% to 80.4%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.048 [95% CI, 0.684 to 1.606]; P = .8305). Outcome prediction by PET was independent of the International Prognostic Index. Results in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were similar to those in the total group. Conclusion Interim PET predicted survival in patients with aggressive lymphomas treated with R-CHOP. PET-based treatment intensification did not improve outcome.

Role of radiotherapy for elderly DLBCL patients in the rituximab (R) era: Final results of the RICOVER-60-no-rx study of the DSHNHL

8022

Background: 117/306 (38%) of the total of 1,222 elderly (61-80 y) DLBCL pts. treated in RICOVER-60 with 6xR-CHOP-14+2R were assigned to receive additional radiotherapy (Rx) to bulky disease (Pfreundschuh et al., Lancet Oncol. 2008). To study the relevance of Rx to bulky disease (Bx), 166 pts. were prospectively treated without Rx in the R-CHOP-14-noRx amendment of RICOVER-60. Methods: The outcome of 166 R-CHOP-14-noRx patients was compared with the 306 patients who had received 6xR-CHOP-14+2R plus radiotherapy to Bx (≥7.5 cm) in RICOVER-60. Methods: The outcome of 166 R-CHOP-14-noRx patients was compared with the 306 patients who had received 6xR-CHOP-14+2R plus radiotherapy to Bx (≥7.5 cm) in RICOVER-60. Results: 164/166 R-CHOP-noRx patients are evaluable (median observation: 39 mos). Patients in R-CHOP-noRx were older (71 vs. 69 y.; median; p=0.018), more frequently in advanced stages (60% vs. 50%; p=0.037), and with extranodal involvement (63% vs. 53%; p=0.024), while Bx was more frequent in R-CHOP-14-Rx (38% vs. 29%; p=0.038). Overall response to therapy, EFS and OS were similar in the two studies adjusting for the prognostic imbalances between the cohorts. Patients with Bx who received received additional radiotherapy to Bx in R-CHOP-14-Rx had a better 3-year EFS (80% vs. 54%; p=0.001), a better PFS (88% vs. 62%; p<0.001), and a better OS (90% vs. 65%; p=0.001) compared to R-CHOP-14-noRx. This was due the worse outcome of pts. with Bx in R-CHOP-14-noRx not achieving CR or CRu after 6xR-CHOP, since there was no difference in 3-year EFS in patients with Bx in CR or CRu after 6xR-CHOP-14 with and without additional radiotherapy (3-year EFS and PFS: 84% vs. 75%; p=0.430); OS 87% vs. 79%; p=0.839). Conclusions: In the R era, radiotherapy to bulky disease does not improve the outcome of elderly pts. in CR/CRu after completion of R-CHOP-14 immunochemotherapy, but appears to be beneficial for pts. with Bx not achieving CR/Cru. By restricting Bx radiotherapy to patients not achieving a CR/CRu, 43% of the patients with Bx could be spared radiotherapy. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Induction of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity in murine leukemia models after IL-2 pretreatment of syngeneic and allogeneic bone marrow grafts

To investigate GVL effects, Balb/c mice (H-2d) received 5 x 10(5) A20 (B cell leukemia) or 1 x 10(6) WEHI-3 (myelomonocytic leukemia) cells. These cell lines lead to death after a median of 19 (WEHI-3) or 30 days (A20). A lethal dose of total body irradiation followed by syngeneic BMT resulted in significantly prolonged survival of leukemia-bearing animals. Transplantation of (C57 x Balb/c)F1 (H-2bxd) allogeneic, but GVH-non-reactive marrow grafts differentially influenced the relapse rates in the two leukemia models. Whereas allogeneic BMT reduced the relapse rates in A20-bearing mice, the leukemia-free survival was not improved in mice bearing the leukemia WEHI-3 compared with syngeneic BMT. Pre-treatment of allogeneic (C57 x Balb/c)F1 or syngeneic Balb/c marrow cells with 200 U/ml IL-2 for 24 h did not reduce relapse rates in animals inoculated with A20 leukemia cells compared with unmanipulated bone marrow. In contrast, IL-2 treatment of syngeneic or allogeneic GVH non-reactive donor marrow significantly decreased the relapse rate in mice inoculated with WEHI-3 leukemia cells. The NK cell-mediated lysis of cultured leukemia cells was determined in vitro using a conventional 56Cr-release assay. Our data revealed a strong correlation between the level of natural killer activity determined in vitro and GVL activity in vivo.

Influence of donor lymphocytes on the incidence of primary graft failure after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in a murine model

We used a murine model to determine the impact of donor lymphocyte subsets on the incidence of primary marrow graft failure after transplantation of lymphocyte-depleted bone marrow. After lethal irradiation with 7.5 Gy, Balb/c mice received 1 x 10(5) to 4 x 10(7) GvH-nonreactive (C57 x Balb)F1 or GvH-reactive C57Bl/6 marrow cells. Pretreatment with anti-Thy-1.2, anti-CD4/CD8, anti-asialo-GM1 or L-leucyl-L-leucine methyl ester (Leu-Leu-OMe) was employed to eliminate T lymphocytes and/or natural killer cells. Primary graft failure was defined as death with neutrophils < 0.5 x 10(9)/l. To assess long-term chimaerism, the percentage of H-2b-positive spleen cells was determined. Pretreatment with anti-Thy-1.2, anti-CD4/CD8 or Leu-Leu-OMe successfully eliminated GvHR-induced mortality. Graft failure rates gradually declined from 88% after transplantation of 1 x 10(5) cells to 0% after transplantation of 4 x 10(7) C57Bl/6 cells. The incidence of graft failure, however, was not altered by T-cell depletion, provided that the unspecific loss of marrow cells was compensated for. After transplantation of GvH-nonreactive (C57 x Balb)F1 bone marrow, neither ex-vivo treatment with anti-Thy-1.2 and anti-asialo GM1 nor addition of 1 x 10(7) donor thymocytes to the allograft significantly influenced engraftment. The data obtained in our animal model suggest that the total number of marrow cells is of critical importance for successful marrow engraftment and not the presence or absence of T cells, NK cells or GvHR.