Diagnostic Efficacy of Serum Mac-2 Binding Protein Glycosylation Isomer and Other Markers for Liver Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases

Novel Usefulness of M2BPGi for Predicting Severity and Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients

Background/Objectives: Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) is a novel biomarker for liver fibrosis, and its prognostic role has never been explored in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We compared the M2BPGi level simultaneously with age, severe/critical disease, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) in a total of 53 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (mild/moderate [n = 15] and severe/critical [n = 38]). Methods: M2BPGi levels were measured using the HISCL M2BPGi assay (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) in an HISCL-5000 analyzer (Sysmex), and clinical outcomes were analyzed according to M2BPGi and the clinical variables, using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Kaplan-Meier survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Results: M2BPGi levels differed significantly according to disease severity, 30-day mortality, and 60-day mortality (p = 0.045, 0.011, and 0.002, respectively). In the ROC curve analysis, the M2BPGi, age, SOFA score, and NEWS2, except for severe/critical disease, significantly predicted clinical outcomes (all p < 0.01). In the survival analysis, the hazard ratios of M2BPGi added to each clinical variable were higher than that of each clinical variable alone, and M2BPGi was the only independent prognostic factor for the mortality. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that M2BPGi may be a useful biomarker for assessing disease severity and clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Combined with conventional clinical assessment, M2BPGi would provide objective and valuable information for prognosis prediction in these critically ill patients. Further studies are warranted to extend its utility in other clinical settings.

Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index outperforms Fibrosis-4 in 2843 Korean patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

AIM

The definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has recently been proposed. We aim to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of noninvasive fibrosis markers in predicting liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), and MASLD.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 2843 patients diagnosed with steatotic liver disease at six tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Liver fibrosis was assessed using vibration-controlled transient elastography, and various noninvasive markers, including the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), and serum Mac-2-binding protein glycosylation isomer were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 1106 patients, 79.9% met criteria for NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD. The APRI had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.819, 0.821, and 0.818 for liver fibrosis ≥F2, and 0.819, 0.824, and 0.884 for liver fibrosis ≥F3, and 0.890, 0.884, and 0.889 for fibrosis ≥F4 in NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD, respectively. The FIB-4 index showed AUC values of 0.776, 0.793, and 0.778 for fibrosis ≥F2, 0.788, 0.814, and 0.79 for fibrosis ≥F3, and 0.846, 0.859, and 0.856 for fibrosis ≥F4. The APRI consistently had the highest AUC values, except in individuals older than 64 years for fibrosis ≥F4.

CONCLUSIONS

The APRI was the most effective noninvasive fibrosis marker across NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD, particularly in age-stratified analyses. Further research is needed to establish standardized cut-off values and enhance the clinical utility of these markers in managing liver fibrosis.

Role of noninvasive tests in the prognostication of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

In managing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, which affects over 30% of the general population, effective noninvasive biomarkers for assessing disease severity, monitoring disease progression, predicting the development of liver-related complications, and assessing treatment response are crucial. The advantage of simple fibrosis scores lies in their widespread accessibility through routinely performed blood tests and extensive validation in different clinical settings. They have shown reasonable accuracy in diagnosing advanced fibrosis and good performance in excluding the majority of patients with a low risk of liver-related complications. Among patients with elevated serum fibrosis scores, a more specific fibrosis and imaging biomarker has proved useful to accurately identify patients at risk of liver-related complications. Among specific fibrosis blood biomarkers, enhanced liver fibrosis is the most widely utilized and has been approved in the United States as a prognostic biomarker. For imaging biomarkers, the availability of vibration-controlled transient elastography has been largely improved over the past years, enabling the use of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for accurate assessment of significant and advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Combining LSM with other routinely available blood tests enhances the ability to diagnose at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and predict liver-related complications, some reaching an accuracy comparable to that of liver biopsy. Magnetic resonance imaging-based modalities provide the most accurate quantification of liver fibrosis, though the current utilization is limited to research settings. Expanding their future use in clinical practice depends on factors such as cost and facility availability.

Utility of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer as an excellent biomarker for the prediction of liver fibrosis, activity, and hepatocellular carcinoma onset: an expert review

Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) is a liver fibrosis biomarker that originated in Japan and has been covered by health insurance for 10 years. M2BPGi is useful not only for liver fibrosis stage prediction but also for assessment of the degree of liver inflammation and prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma development. The usefulness of M2BPGi for assessing disease progression in patients with various chronic liver diseases has been demonstrated over the past decade in a large number of patients. Recently, there have been many reports from outside Japan, including reports from South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. These studies demonstrated that M2BPGi is an excellent biomarker that can evaluate the progression of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease. It is also an excellent indicator of liver activity. Recently, a quantitative M2BPGi (M2BPGi-Qt) assay was developed, and future validation in real-world settings is expected. This will enable diagnosis of the progression of liver fibrosis based on more precise test results and is expected to contribute to the early detection and follow-up of diseases caused by chronic hepatitis, as well as post-treatment monitoring. The significance of the M2BPGi-Qt assay will likely become clearer as real-world data accumulate. If new cutoff values for each chronic liver disease stage and activity level using the M2BPGi-Qt assay are set based on real-world data, it is expected that this will become a useful tool to identify cases of liver fibrosis and monitor the progression of chronic liver disease.

Value of Mac-2 Binding Protein Glycosylation Isomer (M2BPGi) in Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Liver Disease: A Comprehensive Review of its Serum Biomarker Role

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) is a broad condition characterized by lipid accumulation in the liver tissue, which can progress to fibrosis and cirrhosis if left untreated. Traditionally, liver biopsy is the gold standard for evaluating fibrosis. However, non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis are developed to assess the fibrosis without the risk of biopsy complications. Novel serum biomarkers have emerged as a promising tool for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in MAFLD patients. Several studies have shown that elevated levels of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) are associated with increased liver fibrosis severity in MAFLD patients. This suggests that M2BPGi could serve as a reliable marker for identifying individuals at higher risk of disease progression. Furthermore, the use of M2BPGi offers a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy, which is invasive and prone to sampling errors. Overall, the usage of M2BPGi in assessing liver fibrosis in MAFLD holds great promise for improving risk stratification and monitoring disease progression in affected individuals. Further research is needed to validate its utility in clinical practice and establish standardized protocols for its implementation.

The value of serum Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The early detection and intervention of liver fibrosis (LF) in patients with chronic liver disease is critical to their management. The accuracy of serum Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) in the diagnosis of LF remains controversial. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the value of serum M2BPGi in diagnosing LF.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The effect values were combined using a random-effects model. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity. In addition, publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis were conducted.

Results

This study includes 12 studies with 2,416 patients. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of M2BPGi in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥F2) were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.71), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84), and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), respectively, while those for predicting extensive fibrosis (≥F3) were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71-0.80), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.81), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84). Sensitivity analysis indicated stable results in this study. The disease type, cut-off values, study country, average age, and male proportion were the sources of heterogeneity in diagnosing significant fibrosis of M2BPGi (p < 0.05). Sample size, disease type, study country, publication year, cut-off values, average age, and male proportion were important sources of heterogeneity in diagnosing extensive fibrosis (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Serum M2BPGi has good diagnostic performance for significant fibrosis and extensive fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), chronic hepatitis C (CHC), or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and is an effective, non-invasive, and convenient marker.

Systematic Review Registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-10-0086/.

Evaluation of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) as a diagnostic marker for staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis

Objective

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) in predicting the stage of liver fibrosis.

Methods

Articles published until October 10, 2023, were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver-operator curves (SROC), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used to examine the accuracy of M2BPGi in predicting the stage of liver fibrosis. A 95% confidence interval (CI) was provided for each estimate.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 3,839 patients with liver fibrosis, 409 of whom progressed to stage 4 or above. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC (AUC) for M2BPGi predicting liver fibrosis ≥F3 were 0.74 (95% CI [0.65-0.82]), 0.84 (95% CI [0.76-0.89]), and 14.99 (95% CI [9.28-24.21]), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for ≥F4 were 0.80 (95% CI [0.70-0.88]), 0.80 (95% CI [0.73-0.86]), and 16.43 (95% CI [0.84-0.90]), respectively.

Conclusion

Among different sample partitions, M2BPGi has the best diagnostic performance for liver fibrosis stage ≥4. Furthermore, the cutoff of 1-2 is more accurate than that of 0-1 or 2-3 for fibrosis ≥ F3 and ≥ F4.

Registration

CRD42023483260.

Prognostication in NAFLD: physiological bases, clinical indicators, and newer biomarkers

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming an epidemic in Western countries. Notably, while the majority of NAFLD patients will not evolve until advanced liver disease, a minority of them will progress towards liver-related events. Therefore, risk stratification and prognostication are emerging as fundamental in order to optimize human and economic resources for the care of these patients.Liver fibrosis has been clearly recognized as the main predictor of poor hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes. However, a prediction based only on the stage of fibrosis is near-sighted and static, as it does not capture the propensity of disease to further progress, the speed of progression and their changes over time. These determinants, which result from the interaction between genetic predisposition and acquired risk factors (obesity, diabetes, etc.), express themselves in disease activity, and can be synthesized by biomarkers of hepatic inflammation and fibrogenesis.In this review, we present the currently available clinical tools for risk stratification and prognostication in NAFLD specifically with respect to the risk of progression towards hard hepatic outcomes, i.e., liver-related events and death. We also discuss about the genetic and acquired drivers of disease progression, together with the physiopathological bases of their come into action. Finally, we introduce the most promising biomarkers in the direction of repeatedly assessing disease activity over time, mainly in response to future therapeutic interventions.

From NAFLD to HCC: Advances in noninvasive diagnosis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has gradually become one of the major liver health problems in the world. The dynamic course of the disease goes through steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinoma. Before progressing to carcinoma, timely and effective intervention will make the condition better, which highlights the importance of early diagnosis. With the further study of the biological mechanism in the pathogenesis and progression of NAFLD, some potential biomarkers have been discovered, and the possibility of their clinical application is gradually being discussed. At the same time, the progress of imaging technology and the emergence of new materials and methods also provide more possibilities for the diagnosis of NAFLD. This article reviews the diagnostic markers and advanced diagnostic methods of NAFLD in recent years.

Early diagnosis of hepatic inflammation in Japanese nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients using 3D MR elastography

BACKGROUND

The damping ratio (DR) and the loss modulus (G″) obtained by 3D MR elastography complex modulus analysis has been reported recently to reflect early intrahepatic inflammation, and is expected to be a noninvasive biomarker of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the role of the DR and the G″ in Japanese NAFLD patients remains unclear.

METHODS

We enrolled 39 Japanese patients with NAFLD who underwent liver biopsy and 3D MR elastography within 1 month and analyzed the association between DR, G″, and histological activity.

RESULTS

Regarding DR, no evident correlation was observed between the DR and histological activity (p = 0.14) when patients with all fibrosis stages were included. However, when patients were restricted up to stage F2 fibrosis, the association of the DR and inflammation became significant, the DR increasing with the degree of activity (p = 0.02). Among the constituents of fibrosis activity, ballooning correlated with the DR (p < 0.01) while lobular inflammation did not. Regarding G″, it was correlated with histological activity (p < 0.01), ballooning (p < 0.01), and lobular inflammation (p < 0.01) in patients with all fibrosis stages and in patients up to F2 fibrosis (p = 0.03 for activity and p = 0.04 for ballooning). The best cutoff value of DR for hepatitis activity in patients within the F2 stage was 0.094 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.775, 95% CI: 0.529-1.000) and G″ was 0.402 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.825, 95% CI: 0.628-1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The DR and G″ reflected the histological activity in Japanese patients with NAFLD during the early stage, indicating these values for noninvasive diagnosis of inflammation in Japanese patients with NAFLD.

SWOT analysis of noninvasive tests for diagnosing NAFLD with severe fibrosis: an expert review by the JANIT Forum

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an advanced form of NAFLD can progress to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, the prognosis of NAFLD/NASH has been reported to be dependent on liver fibrosis degree. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard, but it has several issues that must be addressed, including its invasiveness, cost, and inter-observer diagnosis variability. To solve these issues, a variety of noninvasive tests (NITs) have been in development for the assessment of NAFLD progression, including blood biomarkers and imaging methods, although the use of NITs varies around the world. The aim of the Japan NASH NIT (JANIT) Forum organized in 2020 is to advance the development of various NITs to assess disease severity and/or response to treatment in NAFLD patients from a scientific perspective through multi-stakeholder dialogue with open innovation, including clinicians with expertise in NAFLD/NASH, companies that develop medical devices and biomarkers, and professionals in the pharmaceutical industry. In addition to conventional NITs, artificial intelligence will soon be deployed in many areas of the NAFLD landscape. To discuss the characteristics of each NIT, we conducted a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis in this study with the 36 JANIT Forum members (16 physicians and 20 company representatives). Based on this SWOT analysis, the JANIT Forum identified currently available NITs able to accurately select NAFLD patients at high risk of NASH for HCC surveillance/therapeutic intervention and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Association between Coronary Artery Plaque Progression and Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers in Population with Low Calcium Scores

Background: The severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been found to be associated with atherosclerosis burden. However, whether liver fibrosis scores can be used to predict atherosclerosis progression, especially for patients with low calcium scores, remains undetermined. Methods: A total of 165 subjects who underwent repeated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and had low calcium scores (<100) were enrolled. The segment stenosis score (SSS) from the CCTA was measured, and the association between SSS progression and biochemical parameters was analyzed in addition to liver fibrosis scores, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI), and Forns score. Results: When compared with those without plaque at baseline (SSS = 0), subjects with plaque had higher blood pressure, higher coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, and higher liver fibrosis scores, including Forns score, Fib-4, and NFS. During the medium follow-up interval of 24.7 months, 60 (39.4%) patients displayed SSS progression, while the remaining 105 (63.6%) patients showed no CAD progression. In a multivariate analysis, being male having a high diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and having a high NFS liver fibrosis score were independently associated with the odds ratio for SSS progression. Conclusions: Higher baseline blood pressure and liver fibrosis markers are associated with the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) plaques in subjects in early CAD stages. For disease progression, the male gender, DBP, and NFS appear to be independently associated with coronary atherosclerosis plaque progression in subjects with low calcium scores.

2-Step PLT16-AST44 method: Simplified liver fibrosis detection system in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

AIM

Accurate detection of the hepatic fibrosis stage is essential to estimate the outcome of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Many formulas, biomarkers, and imaging tests are being developed to predict advanced liver fibrosis without performing a liver biopsy. However, these tests do not have high efficiency in detecting early-stage hepatic fibrosis. Therefore, we aimed to detect the presence of hepatic fibrosis (≥F1) merely by using only standard clinical markers.

METHODS

A total of 436 patients with NAFLD who underwent liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled as the discovery cohort (316 patients) and the validation cohort (120 patients). Liver biopsy and laboratory data were matched to extract simple parameters for identifying ≥F1.

RESULTS

We developed a novel simplified ≥F1 detecting system, designated as 2-Step PLT16-AST44 method, where (1) PLT of 16 × 104 /μl or less, or (2) PLT greater than 16 × 104 /μl and AST greater than 44 U/L is determined as having ≥F1 fibrosis. The 2-Step PLT16-AST44 method had a sensitivity of 68%, a specificity of 90%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 97%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 40%, and an accuracy of 72% to detect ≥F1 fibrosis in the discovery cohort. Validation studies further supported these results. Despite its simplicity, the 2-Step PLT16-AST44 method's power to detect ≥F1 fibrosis in total NAFLD patients was comparable to hyaluronic acid, type 4 collagen 7S, FIB-4, and APRI.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose the 2-Step PLT16-AST44 method as a simple and beneficial early-stage hepatic fibrosis detection system.

Novel Usefulness of Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) with Hemoglobin and Lactate Dehydrogenase for Assessing Bone Marrow Fibrosis

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is manually assessed by reticulin and trichrome stain of bone marrow (BM) biopsy and graded on a semi-quantitative scale. Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M₂BPGi) are known to be associated with lung and liver fibrosis, respectively. We explored the usefulness of KL-6 and M₂BPGi to assess BMF. A total of 250 patients who underwent BM biopsy with hematologic or non-hematologic diseases were included, and 42 patients with lung and liver diseases were excluded. The patients’ data, including age, sex, diagnosis, white blood cell, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were collected. Measured KL-6 and M₂BPGi levels were compared with reticulin grade (RG) (grade 0–3). KL-6 levels were significantly elevated with an increase in RG, but M₂BPGi did not show a significant difference. Hb, LDH, or KL-6 were independent predictors for BMF (odds ratio: 1.96, 2.26, 2.91, respectively), but showed poor predictive ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62, 0.61, 0.60, respectively). The combination of Hb, LDH, and KL-6 showed a significantly improved predictive ability for BMF (AUC 0.73; integrated discrimination improvement 0.057; category-free net reclassification improvement 0.625). This is the first study to evaluate the usefulness of KL-6 for assessing BMF. The combination of Hb, LDH, and KL-6 would be an objective and relevant biomarker approach and be applied to risk stratification for BMF.

Serum Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein expression predicts disease severity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients

The role of Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein (WFA+ -M2BP) in the prediction of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains elusive. This study evaluated the performance of WFA+ -M2BP in predicting fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. A total of 80 patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were enrolled. Serum WFA+ -M2BP levels were measured using standard methods. The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index was also measured. The mean values of WFA+ -M2BP were 1.0, 1.0, 0.8, and 2.2 in Metavir fibrosis stage F0, F1, F2, and F3-4, respectively (linear trend p = 0.005). The optimal cut-off value of WFA+ -M2BP in predicting advanced fibrosis (F3-4) was 1.37 cut-off index (COI), yielding the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and accuracy of 75.0, 79.4, 39.1, 94.7, and 78.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Combining WFA+ -M2BP with FIB-4 significantly increased the diagnostic performance for advanced fibrosis, yielding specificity, PPV, and accuracy of 100, 100, and 93%, respectively. The significant factors predicting advanced liver fibrosis in the multivariate regression analysis were WFA+ -M2BP ≥ 1.37 COI (OR/confidence interval [CI]: 9.49/1.63-55.21, p = 0.01) and FIB-4 ≥ 2.80 (OR/CI: 38.18/4.89-297.93, p = 0.001). Monitoring WFA+ -M2BP is suitable for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in NASH patients, particularly in combination with FIB-4.

Comparison of Non-Invasive Clinical Algorithms for Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B to Reduce the Need for Liver Biopsy: Application of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis and Mac-2 Binding Protein Glycosylation Isomer

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive clinical algorithms for the detection of liver fibrosis (LF) can reduce the need for liver biopsy (LB). We explored the implementation of two serum biomarkers, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi), in clinical algorithms for LF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS

Two clinical algorithms were applied to 152 CHB patients: (1) transient elastography (TE) followed by biomarkers (TE/ELF and TE/M2GPGi); (2) biomarker test followed by TE (ELF/TE and M2BPGi/TE). Using the cut-off value or index for the detection of advanced LF (TE≥F3; 9.8 in ELF and 3.0 in M2BPGi), LB was expected to be performed in cases with discordant TE and biomarker results.

RESULTS

In both algorithms, the expected number of LBs was lower when using M2BPGi than when using ELF (TE/ELF or ELF/TE, 13.2% [N=20]; TE/M2BPGi or M2BPGi/TE, 9.9% [N=15]), although there was no statistical difference (P=0.398). In the TE low-risk group (TE≤F2), the discordance rate was significantly lower in the TE/M2BPGi approach than in the TE/ELF approach (1.5% [2/136] vs. 11.0% [15/136], P=0.002). In the biomarker low-risk group, there was no significant difference between the ELF/TE and M2BPGi/TE approaches (3.9% [5/126] vs. 8.8% [13/147], P=0.118).

CONCLUSIONS

Both ELF and M2BPGi can be implemented in non-invasive clinical algorithms for assessing LF in CHB patients. Given the lowest possibility of losing advanced LF cases in the low-risk group when using the TE/M2BPGi approach, this combination seems useful in clinical practice.

Stratification by Non-invasive Biomarkers of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Children

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) ranges from isolated hepatic steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis to fibrosis. We aimed to introduce useful biomarkers released during liver inflammation and fibrogenesis that are easy to use in outpatient clinic and adjust to children to evaluate each NAFLD stage without biopsy.

METHODS

This prospective study included 60 patients aged under 19 years whose alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were elevated from March 2021. All patients were proven to have NAFLD by ultrasonography and laboratory work-up to exclude other causes of hepatitis. Fibroscan and additional laboratory tests for biomarkers [procollagen type1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), osteocalcin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylated isomer (M2BPGi)] were performed. Fibroscan-AST (FAST) score was used for the comparison of steatohepatitis and liver stiffness measurement (kPa) was used for the comparison of advanced fibrosis.

RESULTS

The biomarker that showed a significant difference between the FAST-positive and negative groups was the P1NP/osteocalcin ratio with a p-value of 0.008. The area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of P1NP/osteocalcin ratio^*ALT values (values obtained through multivariate analysis) was 0.939 with the cut-off value of 305.38. The biomarkers that showed a significant difference between the LSM-positive and negative groups were IL-6 and M2BPGi with a p-values of 0.005 and <0.001. AUROC of IL-6 ^*AST values (values obtained through multivariate analysis) was 0.821 with the cut-off value of 228.15. M2BPGi showed a significant linear relationship with LSM in Pearson correlation analysis (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.382; p = 0.003). The diagnostic capability of M2BPGi to evaluate advanced fibrosis showed an acceptable result (AUROC = 0.742; p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive biomarkers can be used to predict each stage of NAFLD in children. The measurements of P1NP, IL-6 or M2BPGi along with the basic chemistry tests would help determine the stage of NAFLD they correspond to at the time of initial diagnosis and predict responsiveness after the treatment.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - a look at diagnostic prospects

This article observes the main trends in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis, which have been observed in world practice recently. From a practical point of view, one of the most significant events was the introduction of a new term “metabolically associated fatty liver disease” (MAFLD), which partly replaced the previously used term “primary non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”. The new nomenclature induces clear diagnostic criteria for MAFLD, and this disease has ceased to be a diagnosis of exclusion, as a result. In the near future, the practical aspects of the application of this nomenclature and new diagnostic criteria are to be evaluated. The second important trend is the increasing role of direct serum markers of liver fibrosis in the diagnosis and prognosis of MAFLD. Thus, collagen type 3 propeptide (PRO-C3), as well as M2BPGi (Mac2 Binding Proteine Glycosylation isomer), look very promising, since research data have demonstrated a higher diagnostic value of these markers in comparison with indirect fibrosis indices, which are most often used in clinical practice. In addition, the search continues for new direct serum markers of fibrosis, which would be more sensitive for detecting liver fibrosis of stages 1-2. In general, one should expect a gradual replacement by serological markers of fibrosis of technically more complex and expensive diagnostic methods, such as magnetic resonance elastography and fibroelastometry.

Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy in Comparison to Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: A Two-Center Experience

There is scarce and conflicting evidence on the comparison between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and percutaneous (PC)-guided liver biopsy (LB). The aim of this study was to compare the two approaches in a series of patients with parenchymal and focal liver lesions. Fifty-four patients undergoing EUS-LB in two high-volume centers between 2017 and 2021 were compared to 62 patients who underwent PC-LB. The primary outcome was diagnostic adequacy rate. The secondary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy, total sample length (TSL), number of complete portal tracts (CPTs), procedural duration, and adverse events. Variables were compared using the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney test. Median age was 56 years (interquartile range 48-69) in the EUS-LB group and 54 years (45-67) in the PC-LB group with most patients being male. Indication for LB was due to parenchymal disease in 50% of patients, whereas the other patients underwent LB due to focal liver lesions. Diagnostic adequacy was 100% in PC-LB and 94.4% in the EUS-LB group (p = 0.74), whereas diagnostic accuracy was 88.8% in the EUS-LB group and 100% in the PC-LB group (p = 0.82). Median TSL was significantly greater in the PC-LB group (27.4 mm, IQR 21-29) when compared to the EUS-LB group (18.5 mm, 10.1-22.4; p = 0.02). The number of complete portal tracts was 21 (11-24) in the PC-LB group and 18.5 (10-23.2) in EUS-LB group (p = 0.09). EUS-LB was a significantly longer procedure (7 min, 5-11 versus 1 min, 1-3 of PC-LB; p < 0.001) and no evidence of adverse events was observed in any of the study groups. These results were confirmed in the subgroup analysis performed according to an indication for LB (parenchymal disease versus focal lesion). Although PC-LB yielded specimens with greater TSL, diagnostic adequacy and accuracy were similar between the two procedures.

Liver Fibrosis in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: From Liver Biopsy to Non-invasive Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Treatment

An increasing percentage of people have or are at risk to develop non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) worldwide. NAFLD comprises different stadia going from isolated steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH is a chronic state of liver inflammation that leads to the transformation of hepatic stellate cells to myofibroblasts. These cells produce extra-cellular matrix that results in liver fibrosis. In a normal situation, fibrogenesis is a wound healing process that preserves tissue integrity. However, sustained and progressive fibrosis can become pathogenic. This process takes many years and is often asymptomatic. Therefore, patients usually present themselves with end-stage liver disease e.g., liver cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease or even hepatocellular carcinoma. Fibrosis has also been identified as the most important predictor of prognosis in patients with NAFLD. Currently, only a minority of patients with liver fibrosis are identified to be at risk and hence referred for treatment. This is not only because the disease is largely asymptomatic, but also due to the fact that currently liver biopsy is still the golden standard for accurate detection of liver fibrosis. However, performing a liver biopsy harbors some risks and requires resources and expertise, hence is not applicable in every clinical setting and is unsuitable for screening. Consequently, different non-invasive diagnostic tools, mainly based on analysis of blood or other specimens or based on imaging have been developed or are in development. In this review, we will first give an overview of the pathogenic mechanisms of the evolution from isolated steatosis to fibrosis. This serves as the basis for the subsequent discussion of the current and future diagnostic biomarkers and anti-fibrotic drugs.