1
|
Ali AMS, Elmolla M, Vijayendra V, Sharouf F, Szylak R, Yörükoglu AG, Farah JO, Rath NK, Bhargava D. Endoscopic Implantation of Spinal Cord Stimulators: Technical Note and Comparison With Standard Techniques. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2025:01787389-990000000-01580. [PMID: 40341326 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2025] [Indexed: 05/10/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective neuromodulatory tool for various chronic pain conditions. Traditionally, the SCS procedure involved an open approach with laminotomy for paddle implants. The minimally invasive percutaneous lead placement has largely replaced open paddles. However, percutaneous leads are prone to migration and may be unfeasible in patients with preexisting epidural scarring, necessitating open paddle placement. An endoscopic approach to the spine would offer reduced morbidity with the stimulation benefits and security of open paddle. We therefore aimed to develop this technique. METHODS An endoscopic method for SCS paddle implantation was developed initially in a cadaveric laboratory. We tested an anterograde and retrograde method of implantation. The retrograde method of implantation was chosen and subsequently used in 5 patients. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was subsequently undertaken to compare these endoscopic cases with consecutive concurrent open and percutaneous cases. RESULTS The retrograde method of implantation was chosen because of reduced bony and soft tissue dissection required. In addition, more secure implantation was possible with this approach. We describe the endoscopic technique in detail. Five endoscopic cases were compared with 20 percutaneous and 13 open cases. Postoperative analgesia requirements for the endoscopic and percutaneous cases were similar, and both were significantly lower than for open cases (P < .001). Operative time was expectantly longer for endoscopic cases. Same-day programming was possible with endoscopic cases, and with modified anesthetic and programming protocols, same-day discharge was possible for our last endoscopic case. With 6-month follow-up, we did not have any wound-related problems or hardware migration in these cases. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that endoscopic SCS implantation is a safe and feasible option that combines key advantages of both open and percutaneous standard approaches for SCS implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad M S Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Systems, Molecular, and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mohamed Elmolla
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Vishwas Vijayendra
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Feras Sharouf
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rafal Szylak
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ali G Yörükoglu
- Spine Centre Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jibril O Farah
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Narendra K Rath
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Deepti Bhargava
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parker SR, Calvert JS, Darie R, Jang J, Govindarajan LN, Angelino K, Chitnis G, Iyassu Y, Shaaya E, Fridley JS, Serre T, Borton DA, McLaughlin BL. An active electronic, high-density epidural paddle array for chronic spinal cord neuromodulation. J Neural Eng 2025; 22:026023. [PMID: 40104941 PMCID: PMC11920892 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/adba8b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2024] [Revised: 01/23/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Abstract
Objective. Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown promise as both a clinical therapy and research tool for studying nervous system function. However, available clinical EES paddles are limited to using a small number of contacts due to the burden of wires necessary to connect each contact to the therapeutic delivery device, limiting the treatment area or density of epidural electrode arrays. We aimed to eliminate this burden using advanced on-paddle electronics.Approach. We developed a smart EES paddle with a 60-electrode programmable array, addressable using an active electronic multiplexer embedded within the electrode paddle body. The electronics are sealed in novel, ultra-low profile hermetic packaging. We conducted extensive reliability testing on the novel array, including a battery of ISO 10993-1 biocompatibility tests and determination of the hermetic package leak rate. We then evaluated the EES devicein vivo, placed on the epidural surface of the ovine lumbosacral spinal cord for 15 months.Main results.The active paddle array performed nominally when implanted in sheep for over 15 months and no device-related malfunctions were observed. The onboard multiplexer enabled bespoke electrode arrangements across, and within, experimental sessions. We identified stereotyped responses to stimulation in lower extremity musculature, and examined local field potential responses to EES using high-density recording bipoles. Finally, spatial electrode encoding enabled machine learning models to accurately perform EES parameter inference for unseen stimulation electrodes, reducing the need for extensive training data in future deep models.Significance. We report the development and chronic large animalin vivoevaluation of a high-density EES paddle array containing active electronics. Our results provide a foundation for more advanced computation and processing to be integrated directly into devices implanted at the neural interface, opening new avenues for the study of nervous system function and new therapies to treat neural injury and dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R Parker
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Jonathan S Calvert
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Radu Darie
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Jaeson Jang
- Cognitive & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan
- Cognitive & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Integrative Computational Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Keith Angelino
- Micro-Leads Medical, Somerville, MA, United States of America
| | - Girish Chitnis
- Micro-Leads Medical, Somerville, MA, United States of America
| | - Yohannes Iyassu
- Micro-Leads Medical, Somerville, MA, United States of America
| | - Elias Shaaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Jared S Fridley
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Thomas Serre
- Cognitive & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - David A Borton
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parker SR, Calvert JS, Darie R, Jang J, Govindarajan LN, Angelino K, Chitnis G, Iyassu Y, Shaaya E, Fridley JS, Serre T, Borton DA, McLaughlin BL. An active electronic, high-density epidural paddle array for chronic spinal cord neuromodulation. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.29.596250. [PMID: 38853820 PMCID: PMC11160681 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.29.596250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Objective: Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown promise as both a clinical therapy and research tool for studying nervous system function. However, available clinical EES paddles are limited to using a small number of contacts due to the burden of wires necessary to connect each contact to the therapeutic delivery device, limiting the treatment area or density of epidural electrode arrays. We aimed to eliminate this burden using advanced on-paddle electronics. Approach: We developed a smart EES paddle with a 60-electrode programmable array, addressable using an active electronic multiplexer embedded within the electrode paddle body. The electronics are sealed in novel, ultra-low profile hermetic packaging. We conducted extensive reliability testing on the novel array, including a battery of ISO 10993-1 biocompatibility tests and determination of the hermetic package leak rate. We then evaluated the EES device in vivo, placed on the epidural surface of the ovine lumbosacral spinal cord for 15 months. Main results: The active paddle array performed nominally when implanted in sheep for over 15 months and no device-related malfunctions were observed. The onboard multiplexer enabled bespoke electrode arrangements across, and within, experimental sessions. We identified stereotyped responses to stimulation in lower extremity musculature, and examined local field potential responses to EES using high-density recording bipoles. Finally, spatial electrode encoding enabled machine learning models to accurately perform EES parameter inference for unseen stimulation electrodes, reducing the need for extensive training data in future deep models. Significance: We report the development and chronic large animal in vivo evaluation of a high-density EES paddle array containing active electronics. Our results provide a foundation for more advanced computation and processing to be integrated directly into devices implanted at the neural interface, opening new avenues for the study of nervous system function and new therapies to treat neural injury and dysfunction.
Collapse
|
4
|
Malinowski MN, Gish BE, Moreira AM, Karcz M, Bracero LA, Deer TR. Electrical neuromodulation for the treatment of chronic pain: derivation of the intrinsic barriers, outcomes and considerations of the sustainability of implantable spinal cord stimulation therapies. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024; 21:741-753. [PMID: 39044340 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2382234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For over 60 years, spinal cord stimulation has endured as a therapy through innovation and novel developments. Current practice of neuromodulation requires proper patient selection, risk mitigation and use of innovation. However, there are tangible and intangible challenges in physiology, clinical science and within society. AREAS COVERED We provide a narrative discussion regarding novel topics in the field especially over the last decade. We highlight the challenges in the patient care setting including selection, as well as economic and socioeconomic challenges. Physician training challenges in neuromodulation is explored as well as other factors related to the use of neuromodulation such as novel indications and economics. We also discuss the concepts of technology and healthcare data. EXPERT OPINION Patient safety and durable outcomes are the mainstay goal for neuromodulation. Substantial work is needed to assimilate data for larger and more relevant studies reflecting a population. Big data and global interconnectivity efforts provide substantial opportunity to reinvent our scientific approach, data analysis and its management to maximize outcomes and minimize risk. As improvements in data analysis become the standard of innovation and physician training meets demand, we expect to see an expansion of novel indications and its use in broader cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brandon E Gish
- Lexington Clinic Interventional Pain, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Alexandra M Moreira
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Marcin Karcz
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Lucas A Bracero
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lam CM, Latif U, Sack A, Govindan S, Sanderson M, Vu DT, Smith G, Sayed D, Khan T. Advances in Spinal Cord Stimulation. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:185. [PMID: 36829678 PMCID: PMC9951889 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuromodulation, specifically spinal cord stimulation (SCS), has become a staple of chronic pain management for various conditions including failed back syndrome, chronic regional pain syndrome, refractory radiculopathy, and chronic post operative pain. Since its conceptualization, it has undergone several advances to increase safety and convenience for patients and implanting physicians. Current research and efforts are aimed towards novel programming modalities and modifications of existing hardware. Here we review the recent advances and future directions in spinal cord stimulation including a brief review of the history of SCS, SCS waveforms, new materials for SCS electrodes (including artificial skins, new materials, and injectable electrodes), closed loop systems, and neurorestorative devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M. Lam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Usman Latif
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Andrew Sack
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Susheel Govindan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Miles Sanderson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Dan T. Vu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Gabriella Smith
- School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Talal Khan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Malinowski M, Heit G, Poree LR, Makous J, Amirdelfan K. A Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation System with a Battery-Free Micro Implantable Pulse Generator. Pain Pract 2022; 22:592-599. [PMID: 35509116 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for the treatment of chronic intractable pain of the trunk and limbs. The mechanism of action may be based, at least in part, upon the gate control theory; however, new waveforms may suggest other mechanisms. Although benefits of the SCS technology generally outweigh the complications associated with SCS, some complications such as infection and skin erosion over the implant can result in device removal. Additional reasons for device removal, such as pocket pain and battery depletion, have driven technological innovations including battery-free implants and device miniaturization. The neurostimulation system described here was specifically designed to address complications commonly associated with implantable batteries and/or larger implantable devices. The benefits of the small size are further augmented by a minimally invasive implant procedure. Usability data show that patients found this novel neurostimulation system to be easy to use and comfortable to wear. What is more, clinical data demonstrate that the use of this system provides statistically significant reduction in pain scores with responder rates (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in pain) of 78% in the low back and 83% in the leg(s). Advances in miniaturization technology arose from the considerable shrinkage of the integrated circuit, with an increase in performance, according to Moore's law (1965). However, commensurate improvements in battery technology have not maintained a similar pace. This has prompted some manufacturers to place the battery outside, against the skin, thereby allowing a massive reduction in the implant volume, with the hopes of fewer device-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Malinowski
- Adena Spine Center, Adena Health System, 4437 State Route 159, STE 115, Chillicothe, OH
| | - Gary Heit
- CEO/Heit Consulting, Inc.PO Box 620931, Woodside, CA
| | - Lawrence R Poree
- Professor and Director of Neuromodulation Service, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California at San Francisco, UCSF Pain Management Center, 2255 Post Street, San Francisco, CA
| | - James Makous
- Makous Research, LLC.2290 Hillyer St, Carlsbad, CA
| | - Kasra Amirdelfan
- Director of Clinical Research, IPM Medical Group, Walnut Creek, CA
| |
Collapse
|