KSAR Study Group for Rectal Cancer. Essential Items for Structured Reporting of Rectal Cancer MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendation from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

What is the predictive value of pretreatment MRI characteristics for achieving a complete response after total neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features in predicting a complete response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

The data of patients who received TNT were analyzed retrospectively. MRI features, including T stage, morphology, length, and volume; the presence of MR-detected extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI), the number of mrEMVI, and the diameter of the largest invaded vein; main vein mrEMVI; presence of MR-detected tumor deposits (mrTDs), the number of mrTDs, and the size of the largest mrTD; MR-detected lymph node status (mrLN); tumor distance from the anal verge; mesorectal fascia involvement (mrMRF + ); and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were recorded. Patients were classified as complete (CRs) or noncomplete responders (non-CRs) according to the pathological/clinical outcomes. For patients managed nonoperatively, a sustained clinical complete response for > 2 years was deemed a surrogate endpoint for complete response. The MRI parameters were categorized into three distinct groups: baseline, advanced, and quantitative features, and were analyzed using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. The ability to predict complete response was evaluated by comparing different combinations of MRI parameters, and performance on an "independent" dataset was estimated using bootstrapped leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV).

RESULTS

The data of 84 patients were evaluated (CRs, n = 44; non-CRs, n = 40). The optimal model, which included baseline and quantitative MRI features, achieved an area under the curve of 0.837 for predicting complete response. Selected predictors were T stage and ADC mean value. Advanced MRI features did not improve the performance of the model.

CONCLUSION

A multivariable model combining T stage and the ADC mean value can help identify LARC patients who are likely to a achieve complete response before the initiation of TNT.

Defining the tumor location in rectal cancer - Practice variations and impact on treatment decision making

OBJECTIVE

To summarize differences in current guideline recommendations for rectal tumor localization and generate an overview of published MRI measurement methods and their correlation with endoscopy.

SUMMARYOF BACKGROUND DATA

Rectal tumor location is a well-known factor that impacts treatment planning, but there is currently no consensus on the optimal method to define it.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to retrieve clinical and radiological rectal cancer guidelines as well as original research studies on MRI-based measurements. Guidelines were assessed for definitions, landmarks, modalities and measurement methods to define tumor location, and how these impact treatment planning. Research studies were evaluated to compare MRI-methods and their correlation with endoscopy.

RESULTS

18 clinical and 6 radiological guidelines were retrieved. In 83 % of clinical guidelines tumor location (low/middle/high) is included in the treatment algorithm as a factor impacting surgical and/or neoadjuvant treatment. Measurement cut-offs and landmarks vary significantly with the anal verge being the most commonly used landmark (28 %). Thirty-nine percent of clinical guidelines offer no definitions to define rectal tumor location. The majority of research studies (67 %) reported good-excellent agreement between MRI and endoscopy, though measurement differences of up to 2.5 cm were reported.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial variation in definitions and landmarks recommended in current guidelines to measure and classify rectal tumor location. This may affect treatment planning as well as trial inclusions, highlighting the need for standardized methods that better align between clinical and radiological guidelines.

Impact of diversion ileostomy on postoperative complications and recovery in the treatment of locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer

The efficacy of diversion ileostomy followed by radical surgery for locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer remains uncertain. This study seeks to compare the effectiveness of treatment with and without diversion ileostomy in preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) and to identify a subset who may benefit from diversion ileostomy after AL occurs in Chinese patients with stage II and III upper-half rectal cancer. A retrospective study enrolled a total of 809 patients with locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer between 2017 and 2021, with 27.6% (n = 223) treated with diversion ileostomy and 72.4% (n = 586) treated without diversion ileostomy. The Diversion(+) group (n = 172) and Diversion(-) group (n = 172) were compared for perioperative outcomes through 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The selection of variables for multivariable logistic regression was determined through bivariate logistic regression analysis. Additionally, optimal cutoff values for risk factors were identified using ROC curve analysis. Within the entire cohort, patients in the Diversion(+) group exhibited a lower distance from the anal verge (DAV) and higher rates of chemoradiotherapy (CRT), diabetes, cN2 stage, mrCRM positivity, EMVI positivity, and CEA elevation compared to those in the Diversion(-) group. Following PSM, a satisfactory balance of baseline variables was achieved between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in AL rates (7.0% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.659) or AL grade distribution (Grade A: 0.6% vs. 0%, Grade B: 5.2% vs. 4.1%, Grade C: 1.2% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.691) between the two groups. However, the Diversion(+) group demonstrated a higher incidence of postoperative complications (30.8% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.004), Clavien‒Dindo III-IV complications (2.9% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.013), particularly wound infections (8.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002), and early postoperative inflammatory small bowel obstruction (EPISBO) (8.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.001) compared to the Diversion(-) group. Results from multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that male gender (OR = 2.354, p = 0.014) was the only independent risk factor associated with AL, while the presence of diversion ileostomy (with vs. without, OR = 1.144, p = 0.686) did not show significant associations. In patients with AL, the onset of the AL was observed to occur later in the Diversion(+) group compared to the Diversion(-) group (7.0 ± 3.3 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4 days, p < 0.001), while the recovery time was significantly shorter (11.3 ± 4.7 vs. 20.3 ± 7.2 days, p < 0.001). Similarly, in Grade C AL patients, the occurence time was delayed in the Diversion(+) group compared to the Diversion(-) group (8.7 ± 4.7 vs. 3.2 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.008), with a shorter recovery time (19.3 ± 2.1 vs. 25.7 ± 6.7 days, p = 0.031). A trend was observed indicating a longer interval before ileostomy restoration in the AL patients compared to the non-AL patients (7.6 ± 4.9 months vs. 5.5 ± 2.9 months, p = 0.079). In addition, DAV (OR = 0.078, p = 0.002) was identified as the only independent factor associated with potential-diversion-benefit in patients with AL, with an optimal cutoff point of 8.6 cm. The utilization of diversion ileostomy as a preventative measure for AL in cases of locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer is not universally endorsed due to potential complications such as small bowel obstruction and wound infection. Nevertheless, in the occurrence of AL, diversion ileostomy may prove advantageous for patient recuperation. Particularly, male patients with a DAV ranging from 7 to 8.6 cm may experience benefits from undergoing diversion ileostomy subsequent to AL in cases of locally advanced upper-half rectal cancer.

[Standardization for Promoting Interoperability of Healthcare Data: The Progression of the Korean Society of Radiology]

In 2023, the Korean Core Data for Interoperability (KR-CDI), comprising 77 elements, was established as a compliance item for healthcare data exchange in Korea to promote patient-centered medical information exchange and reestablish national interoperability in healthcare standardization. Radiologic examinations are in the core classification of diagnostic imaging tests, and the examination name, results, and image data must be exchanged based on standard codes of terminology and transfer. Accordingly, the Korean Society of Radiology has formed a standardization committee that maps radiologic examination names to international standard codes, such as LOINC and SNOMED CT. Additionally, we propose a pilot project for the standardization and exchange of DICOM images and plan a project to map the terms of the Conclusion sections of diagnostic reports to standard codes. The Korean Society of Radiology is actively participating in these efforts.

Standardised and structured reporting in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: recommendations from the Fetal Task Force of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology

Over the last decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a valuable adjunct to prenatal ultrasound for evaluating fetal malformations. Several radiological societies advocate for standardised and structured reporting practices to enhance the uniformity of imaging language. Compared to narrative formats, standardised and structured reports offer enhanced content quality, minimise reader variability, have the potential to save reporting time, and streamline the communication between specialists by employing a shared lexicon. Structured reporting holds promise for mitigating medico-legal liability, while also facilitating rigorous scientific data analyses and the development of standardised databases. While structured reporting templates for fetal MRI are already in use in some centres, specific recommendations and/or guidelines from international societies are scarce in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to propose a standardised and structured reporting template for fetal MRI to assist radiologists, particularly those with less experience, in delivering systematic reports. Additionally, the paper aims to offer an overview of the anatomical structures that necessitate reporting and the prevalent normative values for fetal biometrics found in current literature.

Diagnostic Performance of Rectal CT for Staging Rectal Cancer: Comparison with Rectal MRI and Histopathology

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of rectal CT with that of high-resolution rectal MRI and histopathology in assessing rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-seven patients with rectal cancer who underwent rectal CT with rectal distension using sonographic gel and high-resolution MRI were enrolled in this study. The distance from the anal verge/anorectal junction, distance to the mesorectal fascia (MRF), extramural depth (EMD), extramesorectal lymph node (LN) involvement, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and T/N stages in rectal CT/MRI were analyzed by two gastrointestinal radiologists. The CT findings of 20 patients who underwent radical surgery without concurrent chemoradiotherapy were compared using histopathology. Interclass correlations and kappa statistics were used.

Results

The distance from the anal verge/anorectal junction showed an excellent intraclass correlation between CT and MRI for both reviewers. For EMD, the distance to the MRF, presence of LNs, extramesorectal LN metastasis, EMVI, T stage, and intermodality kappa or weighted kappa values between CT and MRI showed excellent agreement. Among the 20 patients who underwent radical surgery, T staging, circumferential resection margin involvement, EMVI, and LN metastasis on rectal CT showed acceptable concordance rates with histopathology.

Conclusion

Dedicated rectal CT may be on par with rectal MRI in providing critical information to patients with rectal cancer.

Advancements in Standardizing Radiological Reports: A Comprehensive Review

Standardized radiological reports stimulate debate in the medical imaging field. This review paper explores the advantages and challenges of standardized reporting. Standardized reporting can offer improved clarity and efficiency of communication among radiologists and the multidisciplinary team. However, challenges include limited flexibility, initially increased time and effort, and potential user experience issues. The efforts toward standardization are examined, encompassing the establishment of reporting templates, use of common imaging lexicons, and integration of clinical decision support tools. Recent technological advancements, including multimedia-enhanced reporting and AI-driven solutions, are discussed for their potential to improve the standardization process. Organizations such as the ACR, ESUR, RSNA, and ESR have developed standardized reporting systems, templates, and platforms to promote uniformity and collaboration. However, challenges remain in terms of workflow adjustments, language and format variability, and the need for validation. The review concludes by presenting a set of ten essential rules for creating standardized radiology reports, emphasizing clarity, consistency, and adherence to structured formats.

How do they measure up: Assessing the height of rectal cancer with digital rectal exam, endoscopy, and MRI,

Background

Outcomes in rectal cancer are dependent on tumor height. Modalities for assessing tumor height include MRI, endoscopy, and digital rectal exam (DRE). We seek to identify correlations between these modalities.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 120 rectal cancer patients at a single institution. Correlation coefficients and distance of the tumor to anal verge between MRI, endoscopy, and DRE were compared by region.

Results

The distances of tumor (cm) from anal verge were: MRI: 6.2 ± 3.0, endoscopy: 5.9 ± 2.9, DRE: 5.4 ± 2.4 (p = 0.238). Endoscopy and DRE strongly correlated with MRI (spearman coefficient 0.899 and 0.842, respectively). Endoscopy and DRE also strongly correlated (spearman coefficient 0.876). Correlation coefficients were highest in the middle rectum, weak in the low rectum, and non-correlated in the upper rectum.

Conclusions

MRI, endoscopy, and DRE strongly correlated overall. DRE demonstrated the lowest average distance. Correlations differed by region, suggesting high or low rectal tumors are difficult to characterize.

Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) revisited: a detailed analysis of various characteristics of EMVI and their role as a predictive imaging biomarker in the neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess whether size, diameter, and large vein involvement of MR-detected extramural venous invasion (MR-EMVI) have an impact on neoadjuvant therapy response in rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

57 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma scanned with MRI before and after neoadjuvant therapy were included. Two abdominal radiologists evaluated the images with special emphasis on EMVI, on initial staging and after neoadjuvant treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detection of rest EMVI were determined. The association of various MR-EMVI characteristics including number, size, and main vein involvement with treatment response was investigated. In subjects with discordance of radiology and pathology, elastin stain was performed, and images and slides were re-evaluated on site with a multidisciplinary approach.

RESULTS

At initial evaluation, 17 patients were MR-EMVI negative (29.8%) and 40 were MR-EMVI positive (70.2%). Complete/near-complete responders had less number (mean 1.45) and smaller diameter of MR-EMVI (mean 1.8 mm), when compared with partial responders (2.54 and 3.3 mm; p < 0.005). The sensitivity of MRI for rest EMVI detection was high, specificity was moderate, and in one patient elastin stain changed the final decision. In five patients with rest MR-EMVI positivity, carcinoma histopathologically had a distinctive serpiginous perivascular spread, growing along the track of vascular bundle, although it did not appear in intravascular spaces.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that not only the presence, but also size and number of EMVI that may be significant clinically and thus these parameters also ought to be incorporated to the MRI evaluation and prognostication of treatment response. From pathology perspective, tumors growing alongside major vessels may also reflect EMVI even if they are not demonstrably "intravascular."

MRI Evaluation of Complete and Near-Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Purpose To evaluate MRI performance in restaging locally advanced rectal cancers (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and interobserver agreement in identifying complete response (CR) and near-complete response (nCR). Methods 40 patients with CR and nCR on restaging MRI, surgery and/or endoscopy were enrolled. Two radiologists independently scored the restaging MRI and reported the presence of split scar sign (SSS) and MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Diagnostic accuracy and ROC curves were calculated for single and combined sequences, with inter-reader agreement. Results Diagnostic performance was good for detecting CR and weaker for nCR. T2WI had the highest AUCs among individual sequences. There was a significant positive correlation between SSS and CR, with high Sp (89.5%/73.7%) and PPV (90%/79.2%) for both Readers. Similar accuracy rates were observed for the combination of sequences, with AUCs of 0.828–0.847 for CR and 0.690–0.762 for nCR. Interobserver agreement was strong for SSS, moderate for T2WI, weak for the combination of sequences. Conclusions Restaging MRI had good diagnostic performance in identifying CR and nCR. SSS had high Sp and PPV in diagnosing CR, with a strong level of interobserver agreement. T2WI with DWI was the optimal combination of sequences for selecting good responders.

Neoadjuvant therapy of metformin is associated with good tumor response after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

Metformin is associated with good tumor response in preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for rectal cancer. This study aims to demonstrate that the timing of metformin is related to the tumor response on preoperative CCRT for rectal cancer. From January 2010 to December 2017, 232 patients who underwent curative resection after preoperative CCRT were reviewed. Patients were divided into groups with or without diabetes or metformin. The timing of metformin administration was divided based on before and from initiation of CCRT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for tumor response. Tumor downstaging (p = 0.02) and good response rates of tumor regression grade (TRG) (p = 0.008) were significantly higher in the group administered metformin before CCRT than other groups. In the multivariate analysis, metformin administration before CCRT was a significant factor in predicting tumor downstaging [odds ratio (OR) 10.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76–102.08, p = 0.02] and good TRG (OR 12.55, 95% CI 2.38–80.24, p = 0.004). In patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative CCRT, neoadjuvant therapy of metformin before CCRT was significantly associated with good tumor response.

Accuracy of MRI for predicting anterior peritoneal reflection involvement in locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison with operative findings

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative rectal MRI for anterior peritoneal reflection (APR) involvement in rectal cancer through comparison with the surgeon's operative findings.

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. We enrolled 55 consecutive patients with suspected locally advanced mid-to-upper rectal cancer. All patients underwent rectal MRI using a 3T system. APR involvement in rectal cancer was assessed radiologically using a 5-point scale by two independent board-certified abdominal radiologists. The surgeon's evaluation during surgery was regarded as the gold standard for APR involvement. The accuracy of rectal MRI in predicting APR involvement was obtained.

RESULTS

Rectal MRI showed good APR identification (rater 1, 92.7%; rater 2, 94.7%). On preoperative rectal MRI, rater 1 diagnosed 19 (34.5%) patients as having APR involvement and rater 2 diagnosed 28 (50.9%) as having APR involvement. There was moderate agreement (κ = 0.602, p < 0.001) between the two raters with regard to the evaluation of APR involvement. During surgery, the surgeon confirmed APR involvement in 13 (23.6%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of preoperative MRI for APR involvement were 69.2%, 76.2%, 47.4%, and 88.9%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for predicting APR involvement was 74.6%.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative rectal MRI provides accurate anatomical information regarding APR involvement with high conspicuity. However, MRI has relatively low sensitivity (< 70%) and a low PPV (< 50%) with regard to the assessment of APR involvement in rectal tumors. Both rater 1 and rater 2 evaluated these images as positive involvement of APR. The patient underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection after preoperative evaluation. However, during surgery, the surgeon evaluated APR involvement as negative, and the final pathologic staging was confirmed as T3.

Omission of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for clinical T2/N1 and T3N0/1 middle and low rectal cancers with safe circumferential resection margins

Purpose

For moderately advanced rectal cancers with safe circumferential margins, the oncologic benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy must be reconsidered because of the possibility of overtreatment, resulting in complications from radiotoxicity. To evaluate the oncologic safety of the omission of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for moderately advanced rectal cancers, we evaluated and compared the prognoses of patients who underwent radical resection with and without neoadjuvant radiotherapy for T2/N1 and T3N0/1 middle and low rectal cancers with safe circumferential resection margins.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 66 patients who underwent radical resection for clinical (c) T2N1 and T3N0/1 middle and low rectal cancers between 2008 and 2014. Patients with distant metastasis; cT4, cN2, or positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes; positive circumferential resection margin; signet-ring cell carcinoma; cT1/2N0; or those who had received adjuvant radiotherapy were excluded. The clinical and pathological characteristics and 5-year oncologic outcomes of the no-radiotherapy (n = 34) and radiotherapy (n = 32) groups were compared.

Results

The rates of abdominoperineal resection and ileostomies and the proportion of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly higher in the radiotherapy group. There were no significant differences in tumor location, clinical stage, surgery type, pathologic N stage, anastomotic leakage, or long-term oncologic outcomes including 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and local recurrence and distant metastasis rates between both groups.

Conclusion

The oncologic benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for cT2/N1 and T3N0/1 middle and low rectal cancers with safe circumferential resection margins is considered unclear, and it can be omitted to prevent radiotoxicity and facilitate prompt essential treatment.

Multi-practice survey on MR imaging practice patterns in rectal cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

To investigate practice patterns related to MR technique and structured reporting for MRI of rectal cancer at academic centers and private practice groups in the United States.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A survey developed by active members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease Focus Panel was sent to 100 private practice and 189 academic radiology groups. The survey asked targeted questions about practice demographics and utilization, technical MR parameters and reporting practices related to MRI of rectal cancer. The results were analyzed using software in an online survey program.

RESULTS

The survey received 47 unique responses from academic (37/47, 78.7%) and private practice (10/47, 21.3%) groups. Most practices report using rectal MR for staging newly diagnosed rectal cancer always (29/47, 61.7%), and less than half always do so for re-staging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (20/47, 42.6%). Most groups perform between 1 to 5 rectal MR studies for baseline staging per week (32/47, 68.1%) and most groups perform 0 to 2 MR studies for re-staging per week (27/47, 57.4%). Regarding patient preparation and MR technical parameters, there is variability, but a few key points include most practices (27/47, 57.4%) acquire axial T2-weighted images at a slice thickness of 3 mm or less, axial T2-weighted images with 2D acquisition (30/47, 63.8%), a T2-weighted axial oblique sequence through the tumor (43/47, 91.5%), and T2-weighted images without fat suppression (37/47, 78.7%). Equal numbers of groups report using a maximal b-value less than 1000 s/mm² (19/43, 44.2%) and 1000 s/mm² or greater (19/43, 44.2%); the rest were unsure. A substantial portion of respondents do not use intravenous contrast (13/47, 27.7%). Most believe that structured report templates contribute to uniformity of reporting practices (39/47, 83.0%), though there is considerable heterogeneity in usage and included elements.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable technical heterogeneity among respondents' answers and reporting practices in MR for rectal cancer, and most of the groups report reading only a modest number of studies per week. Our findings suggest there may be room for improvement in terms of radiologist education for performance and standardization of clinical practice for MR imaging of rectal cancer.

Deep-Learning-Based Natural Language Processing of Serial Free-Text Radiological Reports for Predicting Rectal Cancer Patient Survival

Most electronic medical records, such as free-text radiological reports, are unstructured; however, the methodological approaches to analyzing these accumulating unstructured records are limited. This article proposes a deep-transfer-learning-based natural language processing model that analyzes serial magnetic resonance imaging reports of rectal cancer patients and predicts their overall survival. To evaluate the model, a retrospective cohort study of 4,338 rectal cancer patients was conducted. The experimental results revealed that the proposed model utilizing pre-trained clinical linguistic knowledge could predict the overall survival of patients without any structured information and was superior to the carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting survival. The deep-transfer-learning model using free-text radiological reports can predict the survival of patients with rectal cancer, thereby increasing the utility of unstructured medical big data.

Computed Tomography Structured Reporting in the Staging of Lymphoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal

Structured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports for lymphoma patients during the staging phase to improve communication between radiologists, members of multidisciplinary teams, and patients. A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), was established. A modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. The Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. The final SR version was divided into four sections: (a) Patient Clinical Data, (b) Clinical Evaluation, (c) Imaging Protocol, and (d) Report, including n = 13 items in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, n = 8 items in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, n = 9 items in the "Imaging Protocol" section, and n = 32 items in the "Report" section. Overall, 62 items were included in the final version of the SR. A dedicated section of significant images was added as part of the report. In the first Delphi round, all sections received more than a good rating (≥3). The overall mean score of the experts and the sum of score for structured report were 4.4 (range 1-5) and 1524 (mean value of 101.6 and standard deviation of 11.8). The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.89 in the first round. In the second Delphi round, all sections received more than an excellent rating (≥4). The overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for structured report were 4.9 (range 3-5) and 1694 (mean value of 112.9 and standard deviation of 4.0). The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.87 in this round. The highest overall means value, highest sum of scores of the panelists, and smallest standard deviation values of the evaluations in this round reflect the increase of the internal consistency and agreement among experts in the second round compared to first round. The accurate statement of imaging data given to referring physicians is critical for patient care; the information contained affects both the decision-making process and the subsequent treatment. The radiology report is the most important source of clinical imaging information. It conveys critical information about the patient's health and the radiologist's interpretation of medical findings. It also communicates information to the referring physicians and records this information for future clinical and research use. The present SR was generated based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise and uses standardized terminology and structures, in order to adhere to diagnostic/therapeutic recommendations and facilitate enrolment in clinical trials, to reduce any ambiguity that may arise from non-conventional language, and to enable better communication between radiologists and clinicians.

Performances of Whole Tumor Texture Analysis Based on MRI: Predicting Preoperative T Stage of Rectal Carcinomas

Objective

To determine whether there is a correlation between texture features extracted from high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (HR-T2WI) or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and the preoperative T stage (stages T1–2 versus T3–4) in rectal carcinomas.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and fifty four patients with rectal carcinomas who underwent preoperative HR-T2WI and diffusion-weighted imaging were enrolled. Patients were divided into training (n = 89) and validation (n = 65) cohorts. 3D Slicer was used to segment the entire volume of interest for whole tumors based on HR-T2WI and ADC maps. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was performed to select feature. The significantly difference was tested by the independent sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. The support vector machine (SVM) model was used to develop classification models. The correlation between features and T stage was assessed by Spearman’s correlation analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of tumor invasion. The performance of classifiers was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The wavelet HHH NGTDM strength (R_S = -0.364, P < 0.001) from HR-T2WI was an independent predictor of stage T3–4 tumors. The shape maximum 2D diameter column (R_S = 0.431, P < 0.001), log σ = 5.0 mm 3D first-order maximum (R_S = 0.276, P = 0.009), and log σ = 5.0 mm 3D first-order interquartile range (R_S = -0.229, P = 0.032) from ADC maps were independent predictors. In training cohorts, the classification models from HR-T2WI, ADC maps and the combination of two achieved the area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.877, 0.902 and 0.941, with the accuracy of 79.78%, 89.86% and 89.89%, respectively. In validation cohorts, the three models achieved AUCs of 0.845, 0.881 and 0.910, with the accuracy of 78.46%, 83.08% and 87.69%, respectively.

Conclusions

Texture analysis based on ADC maps shows more potential than HR-T2WI in identifying preoperative T stage in rectal carcinomas. The combined application of HR-T2WI and ADC maps may help to improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer invasion.

Improving the completeness of structured MRI reports for rectal cancer staging

PURPOSE

Assess the impact of a multifaceted intervention to improve the completeness of structured MRI reports for patients undergoing initial staging for rectal cancer.

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study was performed at a large academic hospital. MRI reports for initial staging of rectal cancer in 2017 and 2019 were analyzed pre- and post-implementation of multiple quality improvement interventions in 2018, including harmonizing MRI protocols across the institution, educational conferences and modules, and requiring second opinion consultation for all MRI rectal cancer examinations. The primary outcome measure was the completeness of rectal cancer staging MRI reports, classified as optimal, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory based on the inclusion of 15 quality measures pre-defined by a consensus of abdominal and cancer imaging subspecialists, colorectal surgeons, and radiation oncologists at our institution, based on published recommendations. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate changes in report quality and documentation of each quality measure.

RESULTS

The study included 138 MRI reports, of which 72 (52%) were completed in 2017 pre-intervention. Post intervention, the proportion of optimal reports increased significantly from 52.8% (38/72) to 71.2% (47/66) (p = 0.035). Documentation of 1 quality measure (N stage) increased post intervention from 91.7% (66/72) to 100% (66/66) (p = 0.029). Documentation of 7 quality measures was 100% post intervention, with a documentation rate of > 95% for all quality measures except radial location of tumor.

CONCLUSION

A combination of educational and system-wide interventions was associated with an improvement in the completeness of structured MRI reports for rectal cancer staging.

State of the art in abdominal MRI structured reporting: a review

In the management of several abdominal disorders, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to significantly improve patient's outcome due to its diagnostic accuracy leading to more appropriate treatment choice. However, its clinical value heavily relies on the quality and quantity of diagnostic information that radiologists manage to convey through their reports. To solve issues such as ambiguity and lack of comprehensiveness that can occur with conventional narrative reports, the adoption of structured reporting has been proposed. Using a checklist and standardized lexicon, structured reports are designed to increase clarity while assuring that all key imaging findings related to a specific disorder are included. Unfortunately, structured reports have their limitations too, such as risk of undue report simplification and poor template plasticity. Their adoption is also far from widespread, and probably the ideal balance between radiologist autonomy and report consistency of has yet to be found. In this article, we aimed to provide an overview of structured reporting proposals for abdominal MRI and of works assessing its value in comparison to conventional free-text reporting. While for several abdominal disorders there are structured templates that have been endorsed by scientific societies and their adoption might be beneficial, stronger evidence confirming their imperativeness and added value in terms of clinical practice is needed, especially regarding the improvement of patient outcome.

How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers

PURPOSE

To determine an accurate method for localizing rectal cancer using the distance from the anal verge on preoperative MRI.

METHODS

This prospective study included 50 patients scheduled for MRI evaluation of rectal cancer. After rectal filling with gel, MRI was performed with two markers attached at the anal verge. The distance between the tumor and the anal verge on a sagittal T2-weighted image (T2WI) was measured independently by two radiologists using six methods divided into three groups of similar measurement approaches, and compared to those obtained on rigid sigmoidoscopy. The anal verge location relative to the external anal sphincter was assessed on oblique coronal T2WI in reference to the markers. Correlation analysis was performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for verification, and a paired t test was used to evaluate the mean differences.

RESULTS

The highest correlation (ICC 0.797-0.815) and the least mean difference (0.74-0.85 cm) with rigid sigmoidoscopy, and the least standard deviation (3.12-3.17 cm) were obtained in the direct methods group using a straight line from the anal verge to the tumor. The anal verge was localized within a range of - 1.4 to 1.5 cm (mean - 0.31 cm and - 0.22 cm) from the lower end of the external anal sphincter.

CONCLUSION

The direct methods group provided the most accurate tumor distance among the groups. Among the direct methods, we recommend the direct mass method for its simplicity. Despite minor differences in location, the lower end of the external anal sphincter was a reliable anatomical landmark for the anal verge.

MRI Assessment of Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: 2020 Guide for Practice from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Objective

To provide an evidence-based guide for the MRI interpretation of complete tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer using visual assessment on T2-weighted imaging (T2) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

Materials and Methods

PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched on November 28, 2019 to identify articles on the following issues: 1) sensitivity and specificity of T2 or DWI for diagnosing pathologic complete response (pCR) and the criteria for MRI diagnosis; 2) MRI alone vs. MRI combined with other test(s) in sensitivity and specificity for pCR; and 3) tests to select patients for the watch-and-wait management. Eligible articles were selected according to meticulous criteria and were synthesized.

Results

Of 1615 article candidates, 55 eligible articles (for all three issues combined) were identified. Combined T2 and DWI performed better than T2 alone, with a meta-analytic summary sensitivity of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.77; I² = 80.60) and summary specificity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80–0.94; I² = 92.61) for diagnosing pCR. The criteria for the complete response on T2 in most studies had the commonality of remarkable tumor decrease to the absence of mass-like or nodular intermediate signal, although somewhat varied, as follows: (near) normalization of the wall; regular, thin, hypointense scar in the luminal side with (near) normal-appearance or homogeneous intermediate signal in the underlying wall; and hypointense thickening of the wall. The criteria on DWI were the absence of a hyperintense signal at high b-value (≥ 800 sec/mm²) in most studies. The specific algorithm to combine T2 and DWI was obscure in half of the studies. MRI combined with endoscopy was the most utilized means to select patients for the watch-and-wait management despite a lack of strong evidence to guide and support a multi-test approach.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis provide an evidence-based practical guide for MRI assessment of complete tumor response after CRT for rectal cancer.

Management of the adenocarcinoma of the upper rectum: a reappraisal

The present review attempts to assess whether upper rectal cancer (URC) should be treated either as colon cancer or as rectal one, namely to be managed with upfront surgery without neo-adjuvant treatment and partial mesorectal excision (PME), or with neo-adjuvant short course radiotherapy (SCRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as indicated, followed by surgery with total mesorectal excision. Reports from current evidence including studies, reviews and various guidelines are conflicting. Main reasons for inability to reach safe conclusions are (i) the various anatomical definitions of the rectum and its upper part, (ii) the inadequate preoperative local staging,(iii) the heterogeneity of selection criteria for the neo-adjuvant treatment,(iv) the different neo-adjuvant treatment regimens, and(v) the variety in the extent of surgical resection, among the studies. Although not adequately supported, locally advanced URC can be treated with neo-adjuvant CRT provided the lesion is within the radiation field of safety, and a PME if the lower border of the tumour is located above the anterior peritoneal reflection. There is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is of benefit in high-risk stage II and stage III lesions.

Feasibility of Simultaneous Multislice Acceleration Technique in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Rectum

Objective

To assess the feasibility of simultaneous multislice-accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS-DWI) of the rectum in comparison with conventional DWI (C-DWI) in rectal cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

This study included 65 patients with initially-diagnosed rectal cancer. All patients underwent C-DWI and SMS-DWI with acceleration factors of 2 and 3 (SMS2-DWI and SMS3-DWI, respectively) using a 3T scanner. Acquisition times of the three DWI sequences were measured. Image quality in the three DWI sequences was reviewed by two independent radiologists using a 4-point Likert scale and subsequently compared using the Friedman test. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for rectal cancer and the normal rectal wall were compared among the three sequences using repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results

Acquisition times using C-DWI, SMS2-DWI, and SMS3-DWI were 173 seconds, 107 seconds, (38.2% shorter than C-DWI), and 77 seconds (55.5% shorter than C-DWI), respectively. For all image quality parameters other than distortion (margin sharpness, artifact, lesion conspicuity, and overall image quality), C-DWI and SMS2-DWI yielded better results than did SMS3-DWI (Ps < 0.001), with no significant differences observed between C-DWI and SMS2-DWI (Ps ≥ 0.054). ADC values of rectal cancer (p = 0.943) and normal rectal wall (p = 0.360) were not significantly different among C-DWI, SMS2-DWI, and SMS3-DWI.

Conclusion

SMS-DWI using an acceleration factor of 2 is feasible for rectal MRI resulting in substantial reductions in acquisition time while maintaining diagnostic image quality and similar ADC values to those of C-DWI.

Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Radiologic imaging is important for evaluating extrahepatic bile duct (EHD) cancers; it is used for staging tumors and evaluating the suitability of surgical resection, as surgery may be contraindicated in some cases regardless of tumor stage. However, the published general recommendations for EHD cancer and recommendations guided by the perspectives of radiologists are limited. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) study group for EHD cancer developed key questions and corresponding recommendations for the radiologic evaluation of EHD cancer and organized them into 4 sections: nomenclature and definition, imaging technique, cancer evaluation, and tumor response. A structured reporting form was also developed to allow the progressive accumulation of standardized data, which will facilitate multicenter studies and contribute more evidence for the development of recommendations.

Response Assessment with MRI after Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidences

Baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the primary staging modality for surgical plans and stratification of patient populations for more efficient neoadjuvant treatment. Patients who exhibit a complete response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may achieve excellent local tumor control and better quality of life with organ-preserving treatments such as local excision or even watch-and-wait management. Therefore, the evaluation of tumor response is a key factor for determining the appropriate treatment following CRT. Although post-CRT MRI is generally accepted as the first-choice method for evaluating treatment response after CRT, its application in the clinical decision process is not fully validated. In this review, we will discuss various oncologic treatment options from radical surgical technique to organ-preservation strategies for achieving better cancer control and improved quality of life following CRT. In addition, the current status of post-CRT MRI in restaging rectal cancer as well as the main imaging features that should be evaluated for treatment planning will also be described for the tailored treatment.

Survival Benefit for Metformin Through Better Tumor Response by Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metformin may reduce cancer risk and mortality and improve radiotherapy responses in several malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare tumor responses and prognoses of metformin and nonmetformin groups of diabetic patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single institution in the Republic of Korea.

PATIENTS

Between January 2000 and November 2017, 104 patients with rectal cancer who were taking diabetes medication and treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery were reviewed. Patients were divided into those taking (n = 62) and not taking metformin (n = 42). Tumor responses, survival, and other outcomes were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumor response, rectal cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival rates were measured.

RESULTS

Tumor regression grade (p = 0.002), pathological complete response (p = 0.037), and N downstaging (p < 0.001) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy were significantly higher in the metformin group than in the nonmetformin group. In analysis of cancer-specific mortality, metformin use, differentiation (well, moderate vs poor), pathological Union for International Cancer Control stage (3 vs 1-2), ypN stage (1-2 vs 0), and N downstaging (HR, 0.256 (95% CI, 0.082-0.794), p = 0.018; HR, 0.147 (95% CI, 0.031-0.697), p = 0.016; HR, 3.693 (95% CI, 1.283-10.635), p = 0.015; HR, 3.181 (95% CI, 1.155-8.759), p = 0.025, and HR, 0.175 (95% CI, 0.040-0.769), p = 0.021) were significant factors related to mortality in diabetic patients with rectal cancer. In addition, in the multivariate analysis of cancer recurrence, the interaction between metformin use and lymph node downstaging was a significant predictive factor (HR, 0.222 (95% CI, 0.077-0.639); p = 0.005).

LIMITATIONS

This was a small retrospective study conducted at a single institution.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin use was associated with better tumor responses and cancer-specific survival, as well as a lower risk of cancer recurrence, in patients with diabetes mellitus who had lymph node downstaging after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B185. BENEFICIO EN SUPERVIVENCIA CON METFORMINA A TRAVÉS DE UNA MEJOR RESPUESTA TUMORAL CON QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA CONCURRENTE NEOADYUVANTE EN CÁNCER RECTAL: La metformina puede reducir el riesgo de cáncer y la mortalidad y mejorar las respuestas a la radioterapia en varios tumores malignos.Comparar las respuestas tumorales y los pronósticos de los grupos con metformina y sin metformina de pacientes diabéticos que reciben quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante para cáncer de recto.Estudio retrospectivo.Institución única en la República de Corea.Se revisaron 104 pacientes entre enero de 2000 y noviembre de 2017, con cáncer rectal que tomaban medicamentos para diabetes y que fueron tratados con quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante seguida de cirugía radical. Los pacientes se dividieron en aquellos que tomaban (n = 62) y los que no tomaban metformina (n = 42). Se analizaron las respuestas tumorales, la supervivencia y otros resultados.Se midieron las tasas de la respuesta tumoral, la supervivencia específica de cáncer rectal y de la supervivencia libre de enfermedad.El grado de regresión tumoral (p = 0.002), la remisión patológica completa (p = 0.037) y la reducción de la etapa N (p < 0.001) después de la quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante fueron significativamente mayores en el grupo de metformina que en el grupo sin metformina. En el análisis de la mortalidad específica por cáncer, el uso de metformina, la diferenciación (bien, moderada vs pobre), el estadio patológico UICC (3 vs 1-2), el estadio ypN (1-2 vs 0) y la disminución de la etapa N (hazard ratios [intervalos de confianza 95%]: 0.256 [0.082-0.794], p = 0.018; 0.147 [0.031-0.697], p = 0.016; 3.693 [1.283-10.635], p = 0.015; 3.181 [1.155-8.759], p = 0.025 y 0.175 [0.040-0.769], p = 0.021, respectivamente) fueron factores significativos relacionados con la mortalidad en pacientes diabéticos con cáncer rectal. Adicionalmente, en el análisis multivariado de la recurrencia del cáncer, la interacción entre el uso de metformina y la disminución de la etapa ganglionar (N) fue un factor predictivo significativo (hazard ratios [intervalos de confianza del 95%]: 0.222 [0.077-0.639]; p = 0.005).Este fue un estudio retrospectivo pequeño realizado en un solo instituto.El uso de metformina se asoció con mejores respuestas tumorales y supervivencia específica de cáncer, así como un menor riesgo de recurrencia del cáncer, en pacientes con disminución de la etapa ganglionar (N) después de quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante en pacientes con cáncer rectal y diabetes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B185. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).

Structured reporting has the potential to reduce reporting times of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry exams

BACKGROUND

In recent years, structured reporting has been shown to be beneficial with regard to report completeness and clinical decision-making as compared to free-text reports (FTR). However, the impact of structured reporting on reporting efficiency has not been thoroughly evaluted yet. The aim of this study was to compare reporting times and report quality of structured reports (SR) to conventional free-text reports of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry exams (DXA).

METHODS

FTRs and SRs of DXA were retrospectively generated by 2 radiology residents and 2 final-year medical students. Time was measured from the first view of the exam until the report was saved. A random sample of DXA reports was selected and sent to 2 referring physicians for further evaluation of report quality.

RESULTS

A total of 104 DXA reports (both FTRs and SRs) were generated and 48 randomly selected reports were evaluated by referring physicians. Reporting times were shorter for SRs in both radiology residents and medical students with median reporting times of 2.7 min (residents: 2.7, medical students: 2.7) for SRs and 6.1 min (residents: 5.0, medical students: 7.5) for FTRs. Information extraction was perceived to be significantly easier from SRs vs FTRs (P <  0.001). SRs were rated to answer the clinical question significantly better than FTRs (P <  0.007). Overall report quality was rated significantly higher for SRs compared to FTRs (P <  0.001) with 96% of SRs vs 79% of FTRs receiving high or very high-quality ratings. All readers except for one resident preferred structured reporting over free-text reporting and both referring clinicians preferred SRs over FTRs for DXA.

CONCLUSIONS

Template-based structured reporting of DXA might lead to shorter reporting times and increased report quality.

Feasibility of Simultaneous Multislice Acceleration Technique in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Rectum

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of simultaneous multislice-accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS-DWI) of the rectum in comparison with conventional DWI (C-DWI) in rectal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 65 patients with initially-diagnosed rectal cancer. All patients underwent C-DWI and SMS-DWI with acceleration factors of 2 and 3 (SMS2-DWI and SMS3-DWI, respectively) using a 3T scanner. Acquisition times of the three DWI sequences were measured. Image quality in the three DWI sequences was reviewed by two independent radiologists using a 4-point Likert scale and subsequently compared using the Friedman test. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for rectal cancer and the normal rectal wall were compared among the three sequences using repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Acquisition times using C-DWI, SMS2-DWI, and SMS3-DWI were 173 seconds, 107 seconds, (38.2% shorter than C-DWI), and 77 seconds (55.5% shorter than C-DWI), respectively. For all image quality parameters other than distortion (margin sharpness, artifact, lesion conspicuity, and overall image quality), C-DWI and SMS2-DWI yielded better results than did SMS3-DWI (Ps < 0.001), with no significant differences observed between C-DWI and SMS2-DWI (Ps ≥ 0.054). ADC values of rectal cancer (p = 0.943) and normal rectal wall (p = 0.360) were not significantly different among C-DWI, SMS2-DWI, and SMS3-DWI.

CONCLUSION

SMS-DWI using an acceleration factor of 2 is feasible for rectal MRI resulting in substantial reductions in acquisition time while maintaining diagnostic image quality and similar ADC values to those of C-DWI.

Impact of a standardized reporting format on the quality of MRI reports for rectal cancer staging

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Besides providing a surgical roadmap, rectal MRI plays a major role in treatment planning. We recently started using a structured template for reporting rectal cancer via MRI. We study the impact of using this template at our hospital in terms of number of essential imaging parameters described in the reports as compared to the pre-template free-text reports.

METHODS

A structured rectal MRI reporting template was created in consensus with members of the colorectal tumour board and was introduced in the department, which included 14 essential parameters to be mentioned in the reports. We conducted a retrospective analysis of rectal MRI reports of 100 cases with histologically proven rectal cancer, comprising 50 consecutive free-text reports before the template was introduced and 50 consecutive structured reports after its introduction, checking for the presence or absence of inclusion of the 14 parameters. An anonymous online feedback survey was conducted as well after the introduction of the template for the members of the colorectal tumour board.

RESULTS

Overall, the total number of parameters reported increased from a median value of 10 (range 6-13) to 14 (range 12-14). The common unreported parameters prior to template introduction included T staging, presence or absence of restricted diffusion, anterior peritoneal reflection (APR) involvement, and presence or absence of extramural vascular invasion; these were reported in 16%, 22%, 30% and 50% respectively. These improved to 98-100% reporting after template introduction. Maximum improvement was in T staging (16% to 98%) (P < 0.0001), restricted diffusion on DWI (from 22% to 100%) (P < 0.0001) and APR involvement (from 30% to 100%) (P < 0.0001). The most common unreported parameter after template introduction was the "tumoral T2 signal intensity" (unreported in 4% cases). The results of the survey were as follows: 100% felt a decreased need to talk to the radiologist to clarify the report, 81.8% felt an improvement in the quality of reporting as compared to free style reports, and 91% felt that the new template is easier to interpret.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a structured template for rectal cancer significantly improved the quality of rectal MRI reports, along with the satisfaction of referring providers.

Initial M Staging of Rectal Cancer: FDG PET/MRI with a Hepatocyte-specific Contrast Agent versus Contrast-enhanced CT

BackgroundThe performance of PET/MRI in the determination of distant metastases (M stage) in rectal cancer relative to the current practice with contrast material-enhanced CT is largely unknown.PurposeTo compare the staging of clinical M stage rectal cancer with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI (including dedicated liver and rectal MRI) to that of chest and abdominopelvic CT and dedicated rectal MRI.Materials and MethodsFrom January 2016 to August 2017, patients with newly diagnosed advanced mid to low rectal cancers were recruited for this prospective study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT0265170). Participants underwent both FDG PET/MRI with dedicated liver and rectal MRI and chest and abdominopelvic CT (the standard-of-care protocol) within 3 weeks of each other. Thereafter, M stage assessment performance was determined by using findings from 6-month clinical follow-up or biopsy as the reference standard. Performance was compared between protocols. Agreement in M stage classification was also assessed. Nonparametric statistical analyses were performed, and P < .05 indicated a significance difference.ResultsSeventy-one participants (28 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 61 years ± 9; age range, 39-79 years) were enrolled. The M stage could not be determined with the standard-of-care protocol in 22 of the 71 participants (31%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.5%, 43.1%) because of indeterminate lesions. However, among these participants, PET/MRI correctly helped identify all 14 (100%; 95% CI: 76.8%, 100%) without metastases and seven of eight (88%; 95% CI: 47.4%, 99.7%) who were later confirmed to have metastases. PET/MRI showed high specificity for ruling out metastatic disease compared with the standard-of-care protocol (98% [54 of 55 participants] vs 72% [40 of 55 participants], respectively; P < .001), without increasing the number of participants with missed metastasis (6% [one of 16 participants] vs 6% [one of 16 participants]; P > .99).ConclusionPET/MRI with dedicated rectal and liver MRI can facilitate the staging work-up of newly diagnosed advanced rectal cancers by helping assess indeterminate lesions, metastases, and incidental findings better than contrast-enhanced CT, obviating for additional imaging work-up.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.Clinical trial registration no. NCT02651701.

Sensitivity of Various Evaluating Modalities for Predicting a Pathologic Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the sensitivity of various evaluating modalities in predicting a pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

From a population of 2,247 LARC patients who underwent PCRT followed by surgery at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea from January 2007 to June 2016, we retrospectively analyzed 313 patients (14.1%) who showed a pCR after surgery. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT), and endoscopy were performed within 2 weeks prior to surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 313 patients analyzed, 256 (81.8%) had a pCR after radical surgery and 57 (18.2%) showed total regression after local excision. Preoperative TRUS, MRI, and AP-CT were performed in 283, 305, and 139 patients, respectively. Among these 3 groups, a prediction of a pCR of the primary tumor was made in 41 (14.5%), 51 (16.7%), and 27 patients (19.4%), respectively, before surgery. A prediction of a clinical N0 stage was made in 204 patients (88.3%) using TRUS, 130 (52.2%) using MRI, and 78 (65.5%) using AP-CT. Of the 211 patients who underwent endoscopy, 87 (41.2%) had a mention of clinical CR in their records. A prediction of a pathologic CR was made for 124 patients (39.6%) through at least one diagnostic modality.

CONCLUSION

The various evaluation methods for predicting a pCR after PCRT show a predictive sensitivity of 0.15-0.41 for primary tumors and 0.52-0.88 for lymph nodes. Endoscopy is a relatively superior modality for predicting the pCR of the primary tumor of LARC patients.

S122: impact of fluorescence and 3D images to completeness of lateral pelvic node dissection

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) is a technically demanding procedure. Consequently, there is a possibility of incomplete dissection of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs). We aimed to identify metastatic LPNs intraoperatively in real-time under dual guidance of fluorescence imaging and 3D lymphovascular reconstruction, and then to remove them completely.

METHODS

Rectal cancer patients who were scheduled to undergo LPND after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were prospectively enrolled. We traced changes in suspected metastatic LPNs during preoperative CRT and defined them as index LPNs on post-CRT imaging studies. For fluorescence imaging, indocyanine green (ICG) at a dose of 2.5 mg was injected transanally around the tumor before the operation. For 3D reconstruction images, each patient underwent preoperative axial CT scan with contrast (0.6 mm slice thickness). These images were then manipulated with OsiriX. Index LPNs and essential structures in the pelvic sidewall, such as the obturator nerve, were reconstructed with abdominal arteries from 3D volume rendering. All surgical procedures were performed via laparoscopic or robotic approach.

RESULTS

From March to July 2017, ten rectal cancer patients underwent total mesorectal excision with LPND after preoperative CRT under dual image guidance. Bilateral LPND was performed in five patients. All index LPNs among ICG-bearing lymph nodes were clearly identified intraoperatively by matching with their corresponding 3D images. Pathologic LPN metastasis was confirmed in four patients (40.0%) and in five of the 15 dissected pelvic sidewalls (33.0%). All metastatic LPNs were identified among index LPNs. Four (80.0%) of the five metastatic LPNs were located in the internal iliac area.

CONCLUSION

Index LPNs among ICG-bearing lymph nodes in pelvic sidewall were clearly identified and completely removed by matching with their corresponding 3D reconstruction images. Further studies and long-term oncologic outcomes are required to determine the real impact of dual image guidance in LPND.

Diagnostic performance of MRI- versus MDCT-categorized T3cd/T4 for identifying high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancers: a pilot study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-categorized T3cd/T4 tumors for identifying high-risk stage II or stage III cancer in patients with curatively resectable colon cancer in comparison to that of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with histopathologically indicated adenocarcinomas prospectively underwent MRI of the colon. Two radiologists independently and retrospectively assessed for T-category, including T3 substage (≤ T3ab vs. ≥ T3cd). The diagnostic accuracies and interreader agreements between assessments using each modality were compared using a pairwise comparison of receiver-operating characteristic curves and a weighted κ statistic, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (76.3%) were histopathologically diagnosed with high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer. The false-positive rate with MRI was lower than that with MDCT (0% vs. 7.9% for reader 1, 2.6% vs. 10.6% for reader 2). The diagnostic performance of MRI was better than that of MDCT across both readers (AUC: 0.707 vs. 0.506 [P = 0.032] for reader 1, 0.651 vs. 0.485 [P = 0.055] for reader 2). Moreover, MRI interreader agreement for the assessment of T3cd/T4 was significantly better than that of MDCT (κ = 0.821 vs. 0.391 [P = 0.017]).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of MR imaging of the colon may be better than that of MDCT for identifying high-risk stage II or stage III cases. Particularly, colon MRI reduced the false-positive rate and improved the interreader agreement, although further studies with a larger sample size are required.

Structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound examinations

Background

Reports of head and neck ultrasound examinations are frequently written by hand as free texts. Naturally, quality and structure of free text reports is variable, depending on the examiner’s individual level of experience. Aim of the present study was to compare the quality of free text reports (FTR) and structured reports (SR) of head and neck ultrasound examinations.

Methods

Both standard FTRs and SRs of head and neck ultrasound examinations of 43 patients were acquired by nine independent examiners with comparable levels of experience. A template for structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound examinations was created using a web-based approach. FTRs and SRs were evaluated with regard to overall quality, completeness, required time to completion, and readability by four independent raters with different specializations (Paired Wilcoxon test, 95% CI) and inter-rater reliability was assessed (Fleiss’ kappa). A questionnaire was used to compare FTRs vs. SRs with respect to user satisfaction (Mann-Whitney U test, 95% CI).

Results

By comparison, completeness scores of SRs were significantly higher than FTRs’ completeness scores (94.4% vs. 45.6%, p < 0.001), and pathologies were described in more detail (91.1% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001). Readability was significantly higher in all SRs when compared to FTRs (100% vs. 47.1%, p < 0.001). The mean time to complete a report, however, was significantly higher in SRs (176.5 vs. 107.3 s, p < 0.001). SRs achieved significantly higher user satisfaction ratings (VAS 8.87 vs. 1.41, p < 0.001) and a very high inter-rater reliability (Fleiss’ kappa 0.92).

Conclusions

As compared to FTRs, SRs of head and neck ultrasound examinations are more comprehensive and easier to understand. On the balance, the additional time needed for completing a SR is negligible. Also, SRs yield high inter-rater reliability and may be used for high-quality scientific data analyses.

Structured Reporting versus Free-Text Reporting for Appendiceal Computed Tomography in Adolescents and Young Adults: Preference Survey of 594 Referring Physicians, Surgeons, and Radiologists from 20 Hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To survey care providers' preference between structured reporting (SR) and free-text reporting (FTR) for appendiceal computed tomography (CT) in adolescents and young adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An ethical committee approved this prospective study. The requirement for participant consent was waived. We distributed the Likert scale-based SR form delivering the likelihood of appendicitis across 20 hospitals through a large clinical trial. In the final phase of the trial, we invited 706 potential care providers to participate in an online survey. The survey questions included usefulness in patient management, communicating the likelihood of appendicitis, convenience, style and format, and overall preference. Logistic regression analysis was performed for the overall preference. Three months after the completion of the trial, we checked if the use of the SR was sustained.

RESULTS

Responses were analyzed from 594 participants (175 attendings and 419 trainees; 225 radiologists, 207 emergency physicians, and 162 surgeons). For each question, 47.3-64.8% of the participants preferred SR, 13.1-32.7% preferred FTR, and the remaining had no preference. The overall preference varied considerably across the hospitals, but slightly across the departments or job positions. The overall preference for SR over FTR was significantly associated with attendings, SR experience for appendiceal CT, hospitals with small appendectomy volume, and hospitals enrolling more patients in the trial. Five hospitals continued using the SR in usual care after the trial.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the care providers preferred SR to FTR. Further investigation into the sustained use of the SR is needed.

Variation in the Height of Rectal Cancers According to the Diagnostic Modalities

PURPOSE

Although the height of a rectal tumor above the anal verge (tumor height) partly determines the treatment strategy, no practical standard exists for reporting this. We aimed to demonstrate the differences in tumor height according to the diagnostic modality used for its measurement.

METHODS

We identified 100 patients with rectal cancers located within 15 cm of the anal verge who had recorded tumor heights measured by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), colonoscopy, and digital rectal examination (DRE). Tumor height measured by using MRI was compared with those measured by using DRE and colonoscopy to assess reporting inconsistencies. Factors associated with differences in tumor height among the modalities were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean tumor heights were 77.8 ± 3.3, 52.9 ± 2.3, and 68.9 ± 3.1 mm when measured by using MRI, DRE, and colonoscopy, respectively (P < 0.001). Agreement among the 3 modalities in terms of tumor sublocation within the rectum was found in only 39% of the patients. In the univariate and the multivariate analyses, clinical stage showed a possible association with concordance among modalities, but age, sex, and luminal location of the tumor were not associated with differences among modalities.

CONCLUSION

The heights of rectal cancer differed according to the diagnostic modality. Tumor height has implications for rectal cancer's surgical planning and for interpreting comparative studies. Hence, a consensus is needed for measuring and reporting tumor height.

Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluation of extramural venous invasion in patients with primary rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to T ₂ weighted imaging (T ₂WI) for detection of extramural venous invasion (EMVI) in patients with primary rectal cancer.

METHODS:

79 patients (50 men, 29 females, mean age 67.4 years, range 37-87 years) who had undergone rectal MRI and subsequently received surgical resection were included. The rectal MRI consisted of T ₂WI in three planes and axial DWI (b-values, 0, 1000 s mm^-2). Two radiologists blinded to the pathologic results independently reviewed the T ₂WI first, and then the combined T ₂WI and DWI 4 weeks later. They recorded their confidence scores for EMVI on a 5-point scale (0: definitely negative and 4: definitely positive). The diagnostic performance of each reading session for each reader was compared by pairwise comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was considered as the diagnostic performance. The result of a histopathological examination served as the reference standard for EMVI.

RESULTS:

For both readers, the diagnostic performance was not significantly different between the two image sets (for reader 1, AUC, 0.828 and 0.825, p = 0.9426 and for reader 2, AUC, 0.723 and 0.726, p = 0.9244, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

There was no added value of DWI to T2WI for detection of EMVI in patients with primary rectal cancer.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

High-resolution T2WI alone is sufficient to assess EMVI and a supplementary DWI has no added value in patients with primary rectal cancer.

Prognostic value of MRI in assessing extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: multi-readers' diagnostic performance

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted in order to determine the prognostic value of MRI for extramural venous invasion (EMVI) in rectal cancer compared to pathology and to assess the diagnostic performance of multireaders.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 222 patients (M:F = 148:74; mean age ± standard deviation, 61.5 ± 12 years) with histopathologically proven rectal cancers who underwent preoperative MRI between 2007 and 2016. Among them, 74 patients had positive EMVI on pathology (pEMVI) and 148 patients had negative pEMVI. Three radiologists with 7 (reviewer 1), 3 (reviewer 2), and 1 (reviewer 3) year of experience in rectal MR imaging determined the presence of EMVI on MRI (mrEMVI) using a 5-point grading system. Using histopathologic results as the reference standard, radiologists' performances were analyzed and compared with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. For assessment of interobserver variation, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used. Lastly, Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was highest in reviewer 1 (0.829), followed by reviewer 2 (0.798) and reviewer 3 (0.658). Differences in AUCs between reviewer 1 or 2 and reviewer 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.001). ICC was substantial between reviewers 1 and 2. Overall survival (OS) was significantly different according to the positive circumferential resection margin, adjuvant treatment, and the presence of mrEMVI, but not by the presence of pEMVI.

CONCLUSIONS

For experienced radiologists, the diagnostic performance of mrEMVI was good, resulting in better prediction of OS than with pEMVI, with substantial interobserver agreement.

KEY POINTS

• When read by experienced radiologists, MR can provide reliable diagnostic performance in assessing EMVI for patients with rectal cancer. • Positive mrEMVI is an adverse prognostic factor of overall survival and may influence the clinical decision-making.

Big data, artificial intelligence, and structured reporting

The past few years have seen a considerable rise in interest towards artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in radiology. However, in order for such systems to perform adequately, large amounts of training data are required. These data should ideally be standardised and of adequate quality to allow for further usage in training of artificial intelligence algorithms. Unfortunately, in many current clinical and radiological information technology ecosystems, access to relevant pieces of information is difficult. This is mostly because a significant portion of information is handled as a collection of narrative texts and interoperability is still lacking. This review aims at giving a brief overview on how structured reporting can help to facilitate research in artificial intelligence and the context of big data.

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

PURPOSE

To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma.

METHODS

A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed.

CONCLUSION

These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

Contextual Radiology Reporting: A New Approach to Neuroradiology Structured Templates

Structured reporting has many advantages over conventional narrative reporting and has been advocated for standard usage by radiologic societies and literature. Traditional structured reports though are often not tailored to the appropriate clinical situation, are generic, and can be overly constraining. Contextual reporting is an alternative method of structured reporting that is specifically related to the disease or examination indication. Herein, we create a library of 50 contextual structured reports for neuroradiologists and emphasize their clinical value over noncontextual structured reporting. These templates are located in the On-line Appendix, and a downloadable PowerScribe 360 file may be accessed at https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AlPUmfAXPzjkMFcHf7vGKF4Q-vIdpflT.

Magnetic resonance tumour regression grade and pathological correlates in patients with rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence to support the specific use of magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) is inadequate. The aim of this study was to investigate the pathological characteristics of mrTRG after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer and the implications for surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing long-course CRT (45-50 Gy plus a booster dose of 4-6 Gy) for mid or low rectal cancer (cT3-4 or cN+ without metastasis) between 2011 and 2015 who had post-CRT rectal MRI before surgery were included retrospectively. Three board-certified experienced radiologists assessed mrTRG. mrTRG was correlated with pathological tumour regression grade (pTRG), ypT and ypN. In a subgroup of patients with mrTRG1-2 and no tumour spread (such as nodal metastasis) on MRI, the projected rate of completion total mesorectal excision (TME) if they underwent transanal excision (TAE) and had a ypT status of ypT2 or higher was estimated, and recurrence-free survival was calculated according to the operation (TME or TAE) that patients had actually received.

RESULTS

Some 439 patients (290 men and 149 women of mean(s.d.) age 62·2(11·4) years) were analysed. The accuracy of mrTRG1 for predicting pTRG1 was 61 per cent (40 of 66), and that for ypT1 or less was 74 per cent (49 of 66). For mrTRG2, these values were 22·3 per cent (25 of 112) and 36·6 per cent (41 of 112) respectively. Patients with mrTRG1 and mrTRG2 without tumour spread were ypN+ in 3 per cent (1 of 29) and 16 per cent (8 of 50) respectively. Assuming mrTRG1 or mrTRG1-2 with no tumour spread on post-CRT MRI as the criteria for TAE, the projected completion TME rate was 26 per cent (11 of 43) and 41·0 per cent (41 of 100) respectively. For the 100 patients with mrTRG1-2 and no tumour spread, recurrence-free survival did not differ significantly between TME (79 patients) and TAE (21) (adjusted hazard ratio 1·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 8·18).

CONCLUSION

Patients with mrTRG1 without tumour spread may be suitable for TAE.

Structured radiology reporting on an institutional level-benefit or new administrative burden?

Significant technical advances have been made in radiology since the first discovery of X-rays. Diagnostic techniques have become more and more complex, workflows have been digitized, and data production has increased exponentially. However, the radiology report as the main method for communicating examination results has largely remained unchanged. Growing evidence supports that more structured radiology reports offer various benefits over conventional narrative reports. Various efforts have been made to further develop and promote structured reporting. However, regardless of the potential benefits, structured reporting has still not seen widespread implementation into the clinical routine. With recent technical advances, especially new research topics such as big data and machine learning, structured reporting could prove essential for the future of radiology. New interoperable solutions are needed to facilitate the implementation of template-based structured reporting into the clinical routine.

Improving the Quality of MRI Reports of Preoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: Effect of National Guidelines and Structured Reporting

OBJECTIVE

Since the implementation of new guidelines for rectal cancer in The Netherlands in April 2014, clinical stage as seen at preoperative MRI indicates whether neoadjuvant therapy is necessary before rectal cancer surgery. Therefore, the importance of correct MRI interpretation has increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate the completeness of MRI reports of rectal cancer and the effect of implementation of the new guidelines and standardized reporting on the completeness of these reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from all patients who consecutively underwent rectal cancer surgery at one hospital between January 2011 and July 2017. Data were extracted from electronic patient records.

RESULTS

The study included 492 MRI examinations. Before implementation of the new guidelines, a median of 4 of 10 items (interquartile range [IQR], 3-6 items) were described in each MRI report. After implementation of the new guidelines, the number of items described improved significantly (median, 7 items; IQR, 6-8 items; p < 0.001). Implementation of a standardized report led to further significant improvement (median, 9 items; IQR, 9-10 items; p < 0.001). The items scored most frequently were distance between the tumor and the anal verge (85.6%) and length of the tumor (87.6%). The items scored least were presence or absence of extramural venous invasion (21.1%) and morphologic features of the tumor (24.6%).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a standardized protocol and a standardized reporting system for MRI in preoperative staging of rectal cancer results in a more complete MRI report.