Feasibility of Novel Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting of the Prostate Gland: Phantom and Clinical Studies

Multiparametric quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation time of bone metastasis in comparison with red or fatty bone marrow using magnetic resonance fingerprinting

OBJECTIVES

To assess the T1 and T2 values of bone marrow lesions in spine and pelvis derived from magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) and to evaluate the differences in values among bone metastasis, red marrow and fatty marrow.

METHODS

Sixty patients who underwent lumbar spine and pelvic MRI with magnetic resonance fingerprinting were retrospectively included. Among eligible patients, those with bone metastasis, benign red marrow deposition and normal fatty marrow were identified. Two radiologists independently measured the T1 and T2 values from metastatic bone lesions, fatty marrow, and red marrow deposition on three-dimensional-magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Intergroup comparison and interobserver agreement were analyzed.

RESULTS

T1 relaxation time was significantly higher in osteoblastic metastasis than in red marrow (1674.6 ± 436.3 vs 858.7 ± 319.5, p < .001). Intraclass correlation coefficients for T1 and T2 values were 0.96 (p < 0.001) and 0.83 (p < 0.001), respectively. T2 relaxation time of osteoblastic metastasis and red marrow deposition had no evidence of a difference (osteoblastic metastasis, 57.9 ± 25.0 vs red marrow, 58.0 ± 34.4, p = 0.45), as were the average T2 values of osteolytic metastasis and red marrow deposition (osteolytic metastasis, 45.3 ± 15.1 vs red marrow, 58.0 ± 34.4, p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the feasibility of three-dimensional-magnetic resonance fingerprinting based quantification of bone marrow to differentiate bone metastasis from red marrow. Simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification of metastasis and red marrow deposition was possible in spine and pelvis and showed significant different values with excellent inter-reader agreement.

ADVANCE IN KNOWLEDGE

T1 values from three-dimensional-magnetic resonance fingerprinting might be a useful quantifier for evaluating bone marrow lesions.

Advanced MRI techniques in abdominal imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial modality for abdominal imaging evaluation of focal lesions and tissue properties. However, several obstacles, such as prolonged scan times, limitations in patients' breath-hold capacity, and contrast agent-associated artifacts, remain in abdominal MR images. Recent techniques, including parallel imaging, three-dimensional acquisition, compressed sensing, and deep learning, have been developed to reduce the scan time while ensuring acceptable image quality or to achieve higher resolution without extending the scan duration. Quantitative measurements using MRI techniques enable the noninvasive evaluation of specific materials. A comprehensive understanding of these advanced techniques is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI sequences. Herein, we therefore review advanced abdominal MRI techniques.

Reducing femoral flow artefacts in radial magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the prostate using region-optimised virtual coils

High acceleration factors in radial magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) of the prostate lead to strong streak-like artefacts from flow in the femoral blood vessels, possibly concealing important anatomical information. Region-optimised virtual (ROVir) coils is a beamforming-based framework to create virtual coils that maximise signal in a region of interest while minimising signal in a region of interference. In this study, the potential of removing femoral flow streak artefacts in prostate MRF using ROVir coils is demonstrated in silico and in vivo. The ROVir framework was applied to radial MRF k-space data in an automated pipeline designed to maximise prostate signal while minimising signal from the femoral vessels. The method was tested in 15 asymptomatic volunteers at 3 T. The presence of streaks was visually assessed and measurements of whole prostate T1, T2 and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with and without streak correction were examined. In addition, a purpose-built simulation framework in which blood flow through the femoral vessels can be turned on and off was used to quantitatively evaluate ROVir's ability to suppress streaks in radial prostate MRF. In vivo it was shown that removing selected ROVir coils visibly reduces streak-like artefacts from the femoral blood flow, without increasing the reconstruction time. On average, 80% of the prostate SNR was retained. A similar reduction of streaks was also observed in silico, while the quantitative accuracy of T1 and T2 mapping was retained. In conclusion, ROVir coils efficiently suppress streaking artefacts from blood flow in radial MRF of the prostate, thereby improving the visual clarity of the images, without significant sacrifices to acquisition time, reconstruction time and accuracy of quantitative values. This is expected to help enable T1 and T2 mapping of prostate cancer in clinically viable times, aiding differentiation between prostate cancer from noncancer and healthy prostate tissue.

Quantitative Analysis of Prostate MRI: Correlation between Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters

This research aimed to assess the relationship between contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) values and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters including (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and iAUC). To evaluate the correlation between the MRF-derived values (T1 and T2 values, CE T1 and T2 values, T1 and T2 change) and DCE-MRI parameters and the differences in the parameters between prostate cancer and noncancer lesions in 68 patients, two radiologists independently drew regions-of-interest (ROIs) at the focal prostate lesions. Prostate cancer was identified in 75% (51/68) of patients. The CE T2 value was significantly lower in prostate cancer than in noncancer lesions in the peripheral zone and transition zone. Ktrans, Kep, and iAUC were significantly higher in prostate cancer than noncancer lesions in the peripheral zone (p < 0.05), but not in the transition zone. The CE T1 value was significantly correlated with Ktrans, Ve, and iAUC in prostate cancer, and the CE T2 value was correlated to Ve in noncancer. Some CE MRF values are different between prostate cancer and noncancer tissues and correlate with DCE-MRI parameters. Prostate cancer and noncancer tissues may have different characteristics regarding contrast enhancement.

Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: A Review of Clinical Applications

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an approach to quantitative magnetic resonance imaging that allows for efficient simultaneous measurements of multiple tissue properties, which are then used to create accurate and reproducible quantitative maps of these properties. As the technique has gained popularity, the extent of preclinical and clinical applications has vastly increased. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of currently investigated preclinical and clinical applications of MRF, as well as future directions. Topics covered include MRF in neuroimaging, neurovascular, prostate, liver, kidney, breast, abdominal quantitative imaging, cardiac, and musculoskeletal applications.

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting based comprehensive quantification of T1 and T2 values of the background prostatic peripheral zone: Correlation with clinical and demographic features

PURPOSE

To quantify and assess the distribution of MR fingerprinting (MRF)-derived T1 and T2 values of the whole prostatic peripheral zone (PZ), and perform subgroup analyses according to clinical and demographic features.

METHOD

One hundred and twenty-four patients with prostate MR exams and MRF-based T1 and T2 maps of the prostatic apex, mid gland, and base were identified from our database and included. Regions of interest encompassing the right and left lobes of the PZ were drawn for each axial slice on the T2 map and copied to the T1 map. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for assessing differences between subgroups and the Spearman coefficient was used for assessing any correlations.

RESULTS

Mean T1 and T2 values were 1941 and 88 ms, respectively, for the whole-gland, 1884 and 83 ms for the apex, 1974 and 92 ms for the mid-gland, 1966 and 88 ms for the base. T1 values were weakly negatively correlated with PSA values, while T1 and T2 values were weakly positively correlated with prostate weight and moderately positively correlated with PZ width. Finally, patients with PI-RADS 1 scores had higher T1 and T2 values of the whole PZ, compared with those with scores 2-5.

CONCLUSION

Mean T1 and T2 values of the background PZ of the whole gland were 1941 ± 313 and 88 ± 39 ms, respectively. Among clinical and demographic factors, there was a significant positive correlation between T1 and T2 values and PZ width.

MR fingerprinting of the prostate

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been adopted as the key tool for detection, localization, characterization, and risk stratification of patients suspected to have prostate cancer. Despite advantages over systematic biopsy, the interpretation of prostate mpMRI has limitations including a steep learning curve, leading to considerable interobserver variation. There is growing interest in clinical translation of quantitative imaging techniques for more objective lesion assessment. However, traditional mapping techniques are slow, precluding their use in the clinic. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an efficient approach for quantitative maps of multiple tissue properties simultaneously. The T₁ and T₂ values obtained with MRF have been validated with phantom studies as well as in normal volunteers and patients. Studies have shown that MRF-derived T₁ and T₂ along with ADC values are all significant independent predictors in the differentiation between normal prostate tissue and prostate cancer, and hold promise in differentiating low and intermediate/high-grade cancers. This review seeks to introduce the basics of the prostate MRF technique, discuss the potential applications of prostate MRF for the characterization of prostate cancer, and describes ongoing areas of research.

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting in prostate cancer before and after contrast enhancement

OBJECTIVES

To assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the T1 and T2 values derived from nonenhanced (NE) and contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) in the prostate gland and to evaluate differences in values among prostate cancer, the normal peripheral zone (PZ) and the normal transition zone (TZ).

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients (median age, 73 years; range, 48-86) with prostate cancer who underwent multiparametric MRI including NE and CE MRF were included in this study. T1 and T2 values were extracted from NE and CE MRF, respectively. Five quantitative values (the ADC, NE T1, NE T2, CE T1 and CE T2 values) were measured in three areas: prostate cancer, PZ and TZ. We compared the values among the three areas and evaluated the differences between NE MRF and CE MRF values.

RESULTS

ADC values and MRF-derived values were significantly higher in PZ than prostate cancer or TZ (p < 0.001). TZ had a significantly lower CE T1 but significantly higher values of the other variables than prostate cancer (p < 0.001). The T1 values in all three areas and the T2 values in prostate cancer and TZ were significantly lower on CE MRF than on NE MRF (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of NE and CE MRI can be conducted by using the MRF technique. The ADC value and the T1 and T2 values from CE MRF and NE MRF were found to be significantly different between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The T1 and T2 values from contrast-enhanced MR fingerprinting are significantly different between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue.

3D MR fingerprinting (MRF) for simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification of the bone metastasis: Initial validation in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of using 3-dimensional MRF for bone marrow evaluation in the field of view of prostate MRI for T1 and T2 quantification of prostate cancer bone metastases, as well as comparing it to the ADC value.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 30 prostate MRIs were included: 14 cases with prostate cancer bone metastasis and 16 cases without prostate cancer (control). MRF was obtained twice before (nonenhanced [NE] MRF) and after contrast injection (contrast-enhanced [CE] MRF), and T1 and T2 maps were generated from each MRF. Two radiologists independently drew regions of interest (ROIs) on the MRF maps and the ADC maps. Mann-Whitney U tests and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated the two-reader means of T1, T2 and ADC values between bone metastasis and normal bone.

RESULTS

There were 83 ROIs, including 39 bone metastases and 44 normal bone. The two-reader average ADC, NE T2 and CE T2 values were significantly lower and NE T1 and CE T1 values were significantly higher in metastatic bone compared with normal bone (P < 0.001). The AUROC of the ADC was lowest (0.685), which was significantly lower than those of NE T1 (1.0, P = 0.001), NE T2 (0.932, P = 0.004), and CE T2 (0.876, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

MRF to assess the pelvic bone during a prostate gland evaluation provides a reliable parametric map for skeletal work-up. With higher diagnostic performance than the ADC value, NE MRF is a potential alternative for quantifying bone marrow metastases in prostate cancer patients.

Current Applications and Future Development of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting in Diagnosis, Characterization, and Response Monitoring in Cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled non-invasive cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and management in common clinical settings. However, inadequate quantitative analyses in MRI continue to limit its full potential and these often have an impact on clinicians' judgments. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) has recently been introduced to acquire multiple quantitative parameters simultaneously in a reasonable timeframe. Initial retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using MRF for various cancer characterizations. Further trials with larger cohorts are still needed to explore the repeatability and reproducibility of the data acquired by MRF. At the moment, technical difficulties such as undesirable processing time or lack of motion robustness are limiting further implementations of MRF in clinical oncology. This review summarises the latest findings and technology developments for the use of MRF in cancer management and suggests possible future implications of MRF in characterizing tumour heterogeneity and response assessment.