Junior doctors' preparedness to prescribe, monitor, and treat patients with the antibiotic vancomycin in an Australian teaching hospital

Awareness, perception, and barriers of healthcare providers toward the revised consensus guideline for therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin

Background

A revised consensus guideline published in 2020 recommended transitioning vancomycin monitoring to the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC₂₄/MIC). The decision to transition to AUC₂₄/MIC monitoring or to continue trough-based monitoring is made at the institutional level and is influenced by several factors, including healthcare providers and system-related factors. Changing current practices is expected to be difficult, and it is important to understand healthcare providers' perceptions and potential barriers before the transition. This study assessed the awareness and perception of physicians and pharmacists toward the revised guideline and identified barriers to their implementation in Kuwait.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey that employed a self-administered questionnaire was used. A random sample of physicians (n = 390), clinical microbiologists (n = 37), and clinical pharmacists (n = 48) across six Kuwaiti public hospitals were surveyed. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed. Factors associated with awareness and perceptions among the participants were identified.

Results

The response rate was 85.3% (n = 431). Participants had a high (median = 75%) awareness score for the updated vancomycin guideline, as well as a positive perception (median = 5). The main factor identified to affect the awareness and perception of participants following the group analysis was the years of experience. The main barriers identified were a lack of training to perform vancomycin AUC₂₄ calculations, a lack of accurate documentation sample time, and a long turnaround time for serum levels, which might hinder the implementation of the updated guideline.

Conclusion

Physicians, clinical microbiologists, and pharmacists working in Kuwait public hospitals were aware of the 2020 vancomycin monitoring guidelines with positive perceptions. Participants agreed on the several barriers to transitioning to the AUC₂₄/MIC approach, which should be considered by stakeholders before implementation.

The knowledge and perceptions regarding antibiotic stewardship of the interns rotating at the Bloemfontein Academic Complex

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is a global problem with the overuse of antibiotics accelerating this process. Antibiotic stewardship aims to optimise antibiotic treatment to enable cost-effective therapy and improve patients' outcome whilst limiting ABR. The study aimed to evaluate intern medical doctors' knowledge and perceptions about antibiotic stewardship and their perceptions regarding education on relevant topics.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study on interns rotating at Bloemfontein Academic Complex. An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was completed. The questionnaire recorded demographic information, perception and knowledge of antibiotic stewardship, and the quality of education as perceived by the interns.

RESULTS

Of the 120 possible participants, 92 (76.7%) responded to all or part of the questionnaire. The median age of the respondents was 25 years, and 56.7% of the respondents were female. The mean score for the knowledge-based case scenarios was 5.4 out of 10. Only 4.4% participants could manage a drip site infection correctly, whilst 18.5% could treat Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteraemia. The interns perceived that they have a lack of training and preparedness in certain areas of prescribing antibiotics. Though 77.2% of the interns had received education on starting antibiotic treatment, 29.3% claimed to be unsure when to start antibiotic therapy. Interns indicated that formal lectures (81.3%) and bedside tutorials (86.7%) have a high educational value.

CONCLUSION

Intern medical doctors do not have sufficient knowledge to establish antibiotic stewardship but have a desire for improvement. The results identified specific areas where better antibiotic training is required.

Evaluation of Eight-Item Vancomycin Prescribing Confidence Questionnaire Among Junior Doctors

Background: Assessing the preparedness of junior doctors to use vancomycin is important in medical education. Preparedness is typically evaluated by self-reported confidence surveys.

Materials and Methods: An eight-item vancomycin prescribing confidence questionnaire was developed, piloted, and evaluated. The questionnaire responses were collected from 195 junior doctors and a series of statistical techniques, such as principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and were implemented to examine the validity and reliability.

Results: The principal component analysis supported a one-factor structure, which was fed into a confirmatory factor analysis model resulting in a good fit [comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99, Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.08, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.04]. Ordinal-based α was 0.95, and various ωs were all above 0.93, indicating a high reliability level. The questionnaire responses were further proved to be robust to extreme response patterns via item response tree modeling. Jonckheere–Terpstra test results (z = 6.5237, p = 3.429e−11) showed that vancomycin prescribing confidence differed based on the experience in order (i.e., four ordinal independent groups: “≤10 times,” “11–20 times,” “21–30 times,” and “≥31 times”) and therefore provided external validity evidences for the questionnaire.

Conclusions: The questionnaire is valid and reliable such that teaching hospitals can consider using it to assess junior doctors' vancomycin prescribing confidence. Further investigation of the questionnaire can point to the relationship between the prescribing confidence and the actual performance.

Are vancomycin dosing guidelines followed? A mixed methods study of vancomycin prescribing practices

AIMS

Despite the availability of international consensus guidelines, vancomycin dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remain suboptimal. This study aimed to assess concordance of vancomycin dosing and TDM with institutional guidelines and to identify factors taken into consideration by clinicians when prescribing vancomycin.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of 163 patients receiving vancomycin therapy (≥48 hours) was undertaken. Data collected included patient characteristics, dosing history and plasma vancomycin and creatinine concentrations. Concordance of dosing and TDM with institutional guidelines was evaluated. Semi-structured interviews, including simulated prescribing scenarios, were undertaken with prescribers (n = 17) and transcripts analysed.

RESULTS

Plasma vancomycin concentrations (n = 1043) were collected during 179 courses of therapy. Only 24% of courses commenced with a loading dose with 72% lower than recommended. The initial maintenance dose was concordant in 42% of courses with 34% lower than recommended. Only 14% of TDM samples were trough vancomycin concentrations. Dose was not adjusted for 60% (21/35) of subtherapeutic and 43% (18/42) of supratherapeutic trough vancomycin concentrations, respectively. Interview participants reported that patient characteristics (including renal function), vancomycin concentrations, guidelines and expert advice influenced vancomycin prescribing decisions. Despite referring to guidelines when completing simulated prescribing scenarios, only 37% of prescribing decisions aligned with guideline recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Poor compliance with institutional vancomycin guidelines was observed, despite prescriber awareness of available guidelines. Multifaceted strategies to support prescriber decision-making are required to improve vancomycin dosing and monitoring.

The association of the anesthesiologist’s academic and educational status with self-confidence, self-rated knowledge and objective knowledge in rational antibiotic application

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the association of anesthetists’ academic and educational status with self-confidence, self-rated knowledge and objective knowledge about rational antibiotic application. Therefore, anesthetists in Germany were asked about their self-confidence, self-rated knowledge and objective knowledge on antibiotic therapy via the Multiinstitutional Reconnaissance of practice with Multiresistant bacteria (MR2) survey. Other analysis from the survey have been published elsewhere, before.

Results

361 (52.8%) questionnaires were completed by specialists and built the study group. In overall analysis the Certification in Intensive Care (CIC) was significantly associated with self-confidence (p < 0.001), self-rated knowledge (p < 0.001) and objective knowledge (p = 0.029) about antibiotic prescription. Senior consultant status was linked to self-confidence (p < 0.001) and self-rated knowledge (p = 0.005) but not objective knowledge. Likewise, working on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) during the last 12 months was significantly associated with self-rated knowledge and self-confidence (all p < 0.001). In a logistic regression model, senior consultant status was not associated with any tested influence factor. This analysis unveiled that CIC and working on ICU were more associated with anesthesiologists’ self-confidence and self-rated knowledge than senior consultant status. However, neither of the characteristics was thoroughly associated with objective knowledge.

[Is the discipline associated with self-confidence in handling rational antibiotic prescription? : Results from the MR2 study in German hospitals]

BACKGROUND

Besides public awareness and specialist knowledge and training of physicians, their self-confidence plays a key role for clinical decision-making in the respective area.

OBJECTIVE

This exploratory study investigated the influence of the discipline on differences in self-confidence in dealing with antibiotics and in the self-rated knowledge.

METHODS

In 2015 the multi-institutional reconnaissance of practice with multiresistant bacteria (MR2) questionnaire containing items on antibiotic prescription and multiresistant pathogens was sent out to 1061 physicians working in departments for internal medicine, general surgery, gynecology and obstetrics and urology. In 2017 a similar MR2 survey was sent to 1268 specialist and assistant physicians in anesthesiology in Germany. Besides demographic data 4 items on self-confidence in the use of antibiotic treatment and 11 items concerning self-rated knowledge about rational antibiotic therapy and multiresistant pathogens were included in the present analysis. Logistic regression analysis, the χ²-test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis of the influence of the discipline on these items.

RESULTS

The response rates were 43% (456 out of 1061) from the non-anesthetists and 56% (705 out of 1268) from the anesthetists. Of the non-anesthetists 44% and 57% of the anesthetists had had no advanced training on antibiotic stewardship during the year before the study. In the overall analysis anesthetists (mean±SD: 2.53±0.54) were significantly less self-confident about antibiotics than colleagues from other departments (internal medicine: 3.10±0.50, general surgery: 2.97±0.44, gynecology and obstetrics: 3.12±0.42 and urology: 3.15±0.44) in the unadjusted (all p<0.001) and adjusted comparison. The analysis of self-rated knowledge about rational antibiotic prescription showed similar results. Senior consultant status and advanced training in infectiology were significantly associated with self-confidence and self-rated knowledge about antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Anesthetists showed significantly less self-confidence in dealing with antibiotics than colleagues from other disciplines. Advanced training on a rational prescription of antibiotics was associated with a greater self-confidence, so that the implementation of compulsory courses on rational antibiotic stewardship in the respective residency curriculum needs to be considered.

Rational application of antibiotics-The influence of anaesthetists' gender on self-confidence and knowledge

BACKGROUND

High rates of multiresistant pathogens require detailed knowledge about rational utilization of antibiotics. Many physicians consider themselves uncertain about the interpretation of microbiological diagnostics. We examined whether self-confidence, self-rated knowledge, and objective knowledge regarding the use of antibiotics are associated with gender.

METHODS

For this survey study, in 2017, anaesthesiologists and residents of 16 anaesthetic departments in Germany were asked to complete the Multiinstitutional Reconnaissance of practice with Multiresistant bacteria (MR2) survey. It consists of 55 items evaluating self-confidence regarding the practical use of antibiotics (n = 6), self-rated theoretical knowledge (n = 16), and objective knowledge (n = 5). Their answers to these items in relation to their gender were analysed using Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis-H-Tests, and unadjusted as well as adjusted logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-four (response rate: 53.9 %) questionnaires were returned and were available for analysis. Female doctors (35.5 %) felt less self-confident (P < 0.001). Self-rated knowledge differed in overall mean (P = 0.014) and the unadjusted (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55; P = 0.013) but not in the adjusted logistic regression (OR: 0.84; P = 0.525). Objective knowledge differed after pooling questions (61.2% correct answers vs 65.4%, P = 0.01) but not with respect to single items and the adjusted logistic regression (OR: 0.83, P = 0.356).

CONCLUSION

Less self-confidence and a lower self-rated knowledge were found in female anaesthetists; this is consistent to the gender phenomena observed by other researchers. Nevertheless, between the 2 groups objective knowledge did not differ significantly in any item.

Interventions targeting the prescribing and monitoring of vancomycin for hospitalized patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Purpose

Vancomycin prescribing requires individualized dosing and monitoring to ensure efficacy, limit toxicity, and minimize resistance. Although there are nationally endorsed guidelines from several countries addressing the complexities of vancomycin dosing and monitoring, there is limited consideration of how to implement these recommendations effectively.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases to identify relevant comparative studies describing the impact of interventions of educational meetings, implementation of guidelines, and dissemination of educational material on vancomycin dosing, monitoring, and nephrotoxicity. Effect size was assessed using ORs and pooled data analyzed using forest plots to provide overall effect measures.

Results

Six studies were included. All studies included educational meetings. Two studies used implementation of guidance, educational meetings, and dissemination of educational materials, one used guidance and educational meetings, one educational meetings and dissemination of educational materials, and two used educational meetings solely. Effect sizes for individual studies were more likely to be significant for multifaceted interventions. In meta-analysis, the overall effect of interventions on outcome measures of vancomycin dosing was OR 2.50 (95% CI 1.29–4.84); P< 0.01. A higher proportion of sampling at steady-state concentration was seen following intervention (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.26–3.02; P<0.01). Interventions had no effect on appropriate timing of trough sample (OR 2.02, 95% CI 0.72–5.72; P=0.18), attaining target concentration in patients (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.49–4.63; P=0.48, or nephrotoxicity (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42–1.34; P=0.33).

Conclusion

Multifaceted interventions are effective overall in improving the complex task of dosing vancomycin, as well as some vancomycin-monitoring outcome measures. However, the resulting impact of these interventions on efficacy and toxicity requires further investigation. These findings may be helpful to those charged with designing implementation strategies for vancomycin guidelines or complex prescribing processes in hospitals.

Sustained improvement in vancomycin dosing and monitoring post-implementation of guidelines: Results of a three-year follow-up after a multifaceted intervention in an Australian teaching hospital

INTRODUCTION

Despite vancomycin being in use for over half-a-century, it is still not dosed or monitored appropriately in many centers around the world. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to implement a vancomycin dosing and monitoring guideline across multiple medical and surgical units over time.

METHODS

This was an observational before-and-after interventional cohort study. The pre-intervention period was August to December 2010-2011 and the post-intervention period was September to November 2012-2014. The implementation strategy comprised: face-to-face education, online continuing medical education, dissemination of pocket guideline and email reminder. Outcome measures included: appropriate prescribing of loading and maintenance doses, therapeutic drug monitoring, time to attain target range and nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

Post-implementation prescribing of loading doses increased (10.4%-43.6%, P=<0.001), guideline adherent first maintenance dose (44%-68.4% P = 0.04), correct dose adjustment from (53.1%-72.2%, P = 0.009). Beneficial effects pre and post-implementation were observed for adherent timing of initial concentration (43.2%-51.9%, P = 0.01), concentrations in target range (32.6%-44.1%, P = 0.001), time to target range (median 6-4 days, P=<0.001), potentially nephrotoxic concentrations (30.7%-20.9%, P=<0.001) and nephrotoxicity (10.4%-6.8%, P=<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted intervention to implement a vancomycin dosing and monitoring guideline significantly improved prescribing, monitoring, pharmacokinetic and safety outcomes for patients treated with vancomycin over an extended period. However, increased guideline adoption by clinicians is required to maximize and prolong the utility of this important agent.