1
|
Sequino G, Cobo-Diaz JF, Valentino V, Tassou C, Volpe S, Torrieri E, Nychas GJ, Álvarez Ordóñez A, Ercolini D, De Filippis F. Environmental microbiome mapping in poultry processing chain and assessment of microbial dynamics in response to different storage conditions. Food Microbiol 2025; 128:104734. [PMID: 39952751 DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2025.104734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
Abstract
Poultry production chain comprises a complex network involving various stages from rearing to the final distribution of poultry products. This study explores the intricate dynamics within this chain, using shotgun metagenomics, particularly focusing on taxonomic and functional composition of the microbiome, antibiotic resistance and virulence potential. Moreover, the study of the impact of different packaging and storage conditions provides insights into how diverse packaging strategies and storage temperature can impact the shelf-life of chicken meat. Microbiome mapping in poultry processing facility revealed the dominance of Brochothrix thermosphacta, Pseudomonas fragi and Psychrobacter immobilis on poultry-based products and industrial surfaces. Indeed, surfaces of equipment and tools have a significant impact on the microbial composition of the final food products. Furthermore, the study of the microbiome dynamics in chicken meat stored in different packaging (air, modified atmosphere, under vacuum) and temperatures (0, 4 and 10 °C) revealed temperature-dependent microbiota shifts in chicken meat, highlighting specific spoilage organisms (SSOs) in the different packaging methods. Additionally, our results showed that poultry-based products and industrial surfaces belonging to carcasses processing area hosted elevated levels of Antibiotic Resistance Genes, mainly associated with resistance to aminoglycosides, β-lactams, MLSPs (which includes macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins and pleuromutilins) amphenicols and tetracyclines classes and several Virulence-associated genes related to adherence, biofilm, effector delivery system, motility, nutritional/metabolic factors and regulation. Finally, our findings underscored a notably mobile resistome, showing multiple AR class correlated with mobile elements. This poses a considerable risk, emphasizing the urgent need for proactive measures in addressing potential antibiotic resistance genes dissemination in the poultry chain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppina Sequino
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy
| | - José F Cobo-Diaz
- Department of Food Hygiene and Technology and Institute of Food Science and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - Vincenzo Valentino
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy
| | - Chrysoula Tassou
- Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Sofokli Venizelou 1, Lycovrissi, 14123, Attica, Greece
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy
| | - Elena Torrieri
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy
| | | | - Avelino Álvarez Ordóñez
- Department of Food Hygiene and Technology and Institute of Food Science and Technology, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - Danilo Ercolini
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy; Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | - Francesca De Filippis
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, NA, Italy; Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Italy; Institute of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, 12 Nguyen Van Bao Street, Go Vap district, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rebelo A, Duarte B, Ferreira C, Mourão J, Ribeiro S, Freitas AR, Coque TM, Willems R, Corander J, Peixe L, Antunes P, Novais C. Enterococcus spp. from chicken meat collected 20 years apart overcome multiple stresses occurring in the poultry production chain: Antibiotics, copper and acids. Int J Food Microbiol 2023; 384:109981. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
3
|
Jia F, Guo W, Liu Y, Zhang T, Xu B, Teng Z, Tao D, Zhou H, Zhang D, Gao Y. Effects of dietary fiber on intestinal microbiota in geese evaluated by 16SrRNA gene sequencing. J Appl Microbiol 2022; 132:4440-4451. [PMID: 35324068 DOI: 10.1111/jam.15536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of the research is to study the effects of different fiber types and sources on the intestinal flora of geese. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 48 geese (males 35 days old) were divided into 4 groups, each of which included 3 replicates of 4 geese. Groups 1 to 4 were fed a diet containing 5% corn stover Crude fiber (CF, the LJ group), 8% corn stover CF (the HJ group), 5% alfalfa CF (the LM group), or 8% alfalfa CF (the HM group) respectively. After 42 days of feeding, the intestinal flora of each group was determined by 16SrRNA gene sequencing. In the duodenum, the diet supplemented with corn stover meal increased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Euryarchaeota, and with alfalfa as fiber source increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Tenericutes and Chloroflexi. In the jejunum, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria, Tenericutes and Spirochetes were significantly more abundant in the corn stover group. There were no significant differences among the results for the other two fiber sources, which were fibre level in their influence where in ileum. Firmicutes, Deferribacteres and Euryarchaeota with corn stover as fiber source in the cecum were higher than the alfalfa group. CONCLUSIONS Different fiber sources have significant effects on goose gut microbiota. There were same flora has the same trend of change in different intestinal segments. The relative fiber source in the ileum makes the gut microbiota more sensitive to differences in fiber levels.. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY This study proved that the dietary fibre affects the intestinal flora. At the same time, different groups of dietary fibre may be used to provide the possibility to study functional roles of specific bacteria in host physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangyuan Jia
- Key laboratory of Straw Biology and Utilization, The Ministry of Education, Chang Chun City, Jilin, China.,College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Wei Guo
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Yinkun Liu
- Key laboratory of Straw Biology and Utilization, The Ministry of Education, Chang Chun City, Jilin, China.,College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Jilin Province Science and Technology Innovation Platform Management Center, Chun City, Jlin Prov., China
| | - Bo Xu
- Key laboratory of Straw Biology and Utilization, The Ministry of Education, Chang Chun City, Jilin, China.,College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Zhanwei Teng
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Dapeng Tao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Haizhu Zhou
- Key laboratory of Straw Biology and Utilization, The Ministry of Education, Chang Chun City, Jilin, China.,College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Key laboratory of Straw Biology and Utilization, The Ministry of Education, Chang Chun City, Jilin, China.,College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Chang Chun City, Jlin Prov, China
| | - Yunhang Gao
- Key laboratory of Straw Biology and Utilization, The Ministry of Education, Chang Chun City, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nielsen SS, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin‐Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Ståhl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Baldinelli F, Broglia A, Kohnle L, Alvarez J. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistant Enterococcus faecalis in poultry. EFSA J 2022; 20:e07127. [PMID: 35228848 PMCID: PMC8859914 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) was identified among the most relevant antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria in the EU for poultry in a previous scientific opinion. Thus, it has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to the bacterium. The assessment has been performed following a methodology previously published. The outcome is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether AMR E. faecalis can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33-66% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that the bacterium does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 4 (Categories A, B and D; 0-5%, 5-10% and 1-10% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) and the AHAW Panel is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 3 and 5 (Categories C and E, 33-66% and 33-66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for AMR E. faecalis according to Article 8 criteria are mostly birds of the orders Galliformes and Anseriformes, but also mammals and reptiles can serve as reservoirs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Saeed MA, Syed EH, Ghafor A, Yaqub T, Javeed A, Waheed U. Evaluation of Analytical Sensitivity of Sdf I based PCR and Sandwich ELISA for Salmonella Enteritidis detection and On-Farm prevalence in Punjab, Pakistan. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/1806-9061-2021-1492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- MA Saeed
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - EH Syed
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - A Ghafor
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - T Yaqub
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - A Javeed
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - U Waheed
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wales AD, Gosling RJ, Bare HL, Davies RH. Disinfectant testing for veterinary and agricultural applications: A review. Zoonoses Public Health 2021; 68:361-375. [PMID: 33939312 DOI: 10.1111/zph.12830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Disinfectants for veterinary and livestock use, plus skin antiseptics, are critical elements for the control of infectious agents, including zoonotic and antimicrobial-resistant micro-organisms, in managed animal species. Such agents impact animal welfare, economic performance and human health. Testing of disinfectants is needed for safety, efficacy and quality control. The present review examines the principal types of test (carrier, suspension, surface and field) that have been developed or attempted, plus the features inherent in the respective tests, particularly with respect to variability. Elements of testing that have to be controlled, or which can be manipulated, are discussed in the context of real-world scenarios and anticipated applications. Current national and international testing regimes are considered, with an emphasis on the UK, continental Europe and North America, and with further detail provided in the Supporting Information. Challenges to disinfectant efficacy include: the nature of the biological targets (bacteria, fungi, yeasts, spores, viruses and prions), the need for economical and safe working concentrations, the physical and chemical nature of contaminated surfaces, constraints on contact times and temperatures, the presence of organic soil and other barrier or neutralising substances (including biofilms), and thoroughness of pre-cleaning and disinfectant application. The principal challenges with veterinary disinfectant testing are the control of test variability, and relating test results to likely performance in variable field conditions. Despite some ambitions to develop standardised field tests for disinfectants, aside from skin antiseptic trials the myriad problems such tests pose with respect to cost, reproducibility and generalisability remain intractable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Wales
- Department of Pathology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Rebecca J Gosling
- Department of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK
| | - Harriet L Bare
- Department of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK
| | - Robert H Davies
- Department of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA - Weybridge), Addlestone, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Genetic but No Phenotypic Associations between Biocide Tolerance and Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli from German Broiler Fattening Farms. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9030651. [PMID: 33801066 PMCID: PMC8003927 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9030651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Biocides are frequently applied as disinfectants in animal husbandry to prevent the transmission of drug-resistant bacteria and to control zoonotic diseases. Concerns have been raised, that their use may contribute to the selection and persistence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Especially, extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli have become a global health threat. In our study, 29 ESBL-/AmpC-producing and 64 NON-ESBL-/AmpC-producing E.coli isolates from three German broiler fattening farms collected in 2016 following regular cleaning and disinfection were phylogenetically characterized by whole genome sequencing, analyzed for phylogenetic distribution of virulence-associated genes, and screened for determinants of and associations between biocide tolerance and antibiotic resistance. Of the 30 known and two unknown sequence types detected, ST117 and ST297 were the most common genotypes. These STs are recognized worldwide as pandemic lineages causing disease in humans and poultry. Virulence determinants associated with extraintestinal pathogenic E.coli showed variable phylogenetic distribution patterns. Isolates with reduced biocide susceptibility were rarely found on the tested farms. Nine isolates displayed elevated MICs and/or MBCs of formaldehyde, chlorocresol, peroxyacetic acid, or benzalkonium chloride. Antibiotic resistance to ampicillin, trimethoprim, and sulfamethoxazole was most prevalent. The majority of ESBL-/AmpC-producing isolates carried blaCTX-M (55%) or blaCMY-2 (24%) genes. Phenotypic biocide tolerance and antibiotic resistance were not interlinked. However, biocide and metal resistance determinants were found on mobile genetic elements together with antibiotic resistance genes raising concerns that biocides used in the food industry may lead to selection pressure for strains carrying acquired resistance determinants to different antimicrobials.
Collapse
|
8
|
Taylor KJM, Ngunjiri JM, Abundo MC, Jang H, Elaish M, Ghorbani A, Kc M, Weber BP, Johnson TJ, Lee CW. Respiratory and Gut Microbiota in Commercial Turkey Flocks with Disparate Weight Gain Trajectories Display Differential Compositional Dynamics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86:e00431-20. [PMID: 32276973 PMCID: PMC7267191 DOI: 10.1128/aem.00431-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Communities of gut bacteria (microbiota) are known to play roles in resistance to pathogen infection and optimal weight gain in turkey flocks. However, knowledge of turkey respiratory microbiota and its link to gut microbiota is lacking. This study presents a 16S rRNA gene-based census of the turkey respiratory microbiota (nasal cavity and trachea) alongside gut microbiota (cecum and ileum) in two identical commercial Hybrid Converter turkey flocks raised in parallel under typical field commercial conditions. The flocks were housed in adjacent barns during the brood stage and in geographically separated farms during the grow-out stage. Several bacterial taxa, primarily Staphylococcus, that were acquired in the respiratory tract at the beginning of the brood stage persisted throughout the flock cycle. Late-emerging predominant taxa in the respiratory tract included Deinococcus and Corynebacterium Tracheal and nasal microbiota of turkeys were identifiably distinct from one another and from gut microbiota. Nevertheless, gut and respiratory microbiota changed in parallel over time and appeared to share many taxa. During the brood stage, the two flocks generally acquired similar gut and respiratory microbiota, and their average body weights were comparable. However, there were qualitative and quantitative differences in microbial profiles and body weight gain trajectories after the flocks were transferred to geographically separated grow-out farms. Lower weight gain corresponded to the emergence of Deinococcus and Ornithobacterium in the respiratory tract and Fusobacterium and Parasutterella in gut. This study provides an overview of turkey microbiota under field conditions and suggests several hypotheses concerning the respiratory microbiome.IMPORTANCE Turkey meat is an important source of animal protein, and the industry around its production contributes significantly to the agricultural economy. The microorganisms present in the gut of turkeys are known to impact bird health and flock performance. However, the respiratory microbiota in turkeys is entirely unexplored. This study has elucidated the microbiota of respiratory tracts of turkeys from two commercial flocks raised in parallel throughout a normal flock cycle. Further, the study suggests that bacteria originating in the gut or in poultry house environments influence respiratory communities; consequently, they induce poor performance, either directly or indirectly. Future attempts to develop microbiome-based interventions for turkey health should delimit the contributions of respiratory microbiota and aim to limit disturbances to those communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara J M Taylor
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - John M Ngunjiri
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael C Abundo
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Hyesun Jang
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mohamed Elaish
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - Amir Ghorbani
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mahesh Kc
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Bonnie P Weber
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Timothy J Johnson
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
- Mid-Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Willmar, Minnesota, USA
| | - Chang-Won Lee
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maertens H, Van Coillie E, Millet S, Van Weyenberg S, Sleeckx N, Meyer E, Zoons J, Dewulf J, De Reu K. Repeated disinfectant use in broiler houses and pig nursery units does not affect disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli field isolates. BMC Vet Res 2020; 16:140. [PMID: 32423466 PMCID: PMC7236461 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02342-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disinfectants are frequently used in animal production to reduce or eliminate the load of infectious agents and parasites in buildings and equipment associated with the housing or transportation of animals. There are growing concerns that the use of disinfectants would select for resistance to antibiotics and disinfectants. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of repeated use of different disinfectants on the disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility under practical conditions in a broiler and pig pilot farm. Therefore, the susceptibility of Escherichia coli (E. coli) to 14 antibiotics and 4 disinfectants was monitored over a one-year period. RESULTS High (20-50%) to very high (> 50%) resistance levels for ampicillin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and tetracycline were observed in both animal production types. Disinfectant susceptibility did not change over time and did not depend on the used disinfection product. Compared to in-use concentrations of formaldehyde, benzalkoniumchloride and a peracetic acid - hydrogen peroxide formulation, all E. coli strains remained susceptible indicating that the use of disinfectants did not select for disinfectant resistance. Moreover, no association could be found between the use of disinfectants and antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that repeated use of disinfectants in agricultural environments does not select for antibiotic resistance nor does it reduce disinfectant susceptibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Maertens
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium
| | - E Van Coillie
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium
| | - S Millet
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium
| | - S Van Weyenberg
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium
| | - N Sleeckx
- Experimental Poultry Center (EPC), Poiel 77, 2440, Geel, Belgium
| | - E Meyer
- Veterinary Biochemistry Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - J Zoons
- Experimental Poultry Center (EPC), Poiel 77, 2440, Geel, Belgium
| | - J Dewulf
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - K De Reu
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stęczny K, Kokoszyński D. Effect of probiotic preparations (EM) on productive characteristics, carcass composition, and microbial contamination in a commercial broiler chicken farm. Anim Biotechnol 2020; 32:758-765. [PMID: 32302255 DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2020.1754841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
This experiment evaluated the effect of Pro-Biotyk (Em-15) and EMFarma™ probiotics on body weight, feed intake and conversion, carcass traits, and microbial contamination in a poultry house. The probiotic preparations caused a nonsignificant increase in body weight (42 days), feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (1-42 days) and a nonsignificant decrease in chicken mortality from 4 weeks of rearing. Chickens exposed to probiotics did not differ significantly in preslaughter body weight, carcass weight, dressing percentage, and the content of carcass components. The carcasses from experimental chickens had a lower percentage of breast muscle, leg muscle, abdominal fat, and neck, as well as a higher percentage of skin with subcutaneous fat, wings, and remainder of carcasses compared with the carcasses from control birds. The probiotic preparations used in this study were highly effective as auxiliary disinfectants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Stęczny
- Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Dariusz Kokoszyński
- Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, UTP University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maertens H, De Reu K, Meyer E, Van Coillie E, Dewulf J. Limited association between disinfectant use and either antibiotic or disinfectant susceptibility of Escherichia coli in both poultry and pig husbandry. BMC Vet Res 2019; 15:310. [PMID: 31477099 PMCID: PMC6721165 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-2044-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 05/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Farm disinfectants are widely used in primary production, but questions have been raised if their use can select for antimicrobial resistance. The present study examined the use of disinfectants in poultry and pig husbandry and its contribution to the antibiotic and disinfectant susceptibility of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains obtained after cleaning and disinfection. On those field isolates antibiotic susceptibility was monitored and susceptibility to commonly used active components of farm disinfectants (i.e. glutaraldehyde, benzalkoniumchloride, formaldehyde, and a formulation of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide) was tested. RESULTS This study showed a high resistance prevalence (> 50%) for ampicillin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and tetracycline for both production animal categories, while for ciprofloxacin only a high resistance prevalence was found in broiler houses. Disinfectant susceptibility results were homogenously distributed within a very small concentration range. Furthermore, all E. coli strains were susceptible to in-use concentrations of formaldehyde, benzalkoniumchloride and a formulation of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide, indicating that the practical use of disinfectants did not select for disinfectant resistance. Moreover, the results showed no indications for the selection of antibiotic resistant bacteria through the use of disinfectants in agricultural environments. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that the proper use of disinfectants in agricultural environments does not promote antibiotic resistance nor reduce E. coli disinfectant susceptibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helder Maertens
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium
| | - Koen De Reu
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium
| | - Evelyne Meyer
- Veterinary Biochemistry Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Els Van Coillie
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Dewulf
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maes S, Vackier T, Nguyen Huu S, Heyndrickx M, Steenackers H, Sampers I, Raes K, Verplaetse A, De Reu K. Occurrence and characterisation of biofilms in drinking water systems of broiler houses. BMC Microbiol 2019; 19:77. [PMID: 30987581 PMCID: PMC6466764 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1451-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Water quality in the drinking water system (DWS) plays an important role in the general health and performance of broiler chickens. Conditions in the DWS of broilers are ideal for microbial biofilm formation. Since pathogens might reside within these biofilms, they serve as potential source of waterborne transmission of pathogens to livestock and humans. Knowledge about the presence, importance and composition of biofilms in the DWS of broilers is largely missing. In this study, we therefore aim to monitor the occurrence, and chemically and microbiologically characterise biofilms in the DWS of five broiler farms. Results The bacterial load after disinfection in DWSs was assessed by sampling with a flocked swab followed by enumerations of total aerobic flora (TAC) and Pseudomonas spp. The dominant flora was identified and their biofilm-forming capacity was evaluated. Also, proteins, carbohydrates and uronic acids were quantified to analyse the presence of extracellular polymeric substances of biofilms. Despite disinfection of the water and the DWS, average TAC was 6.03 ± 1.53 log CFU/20cm2. Enumerations for Pseudomonas spp. were on average 0.88 log CFU/20cm2 lower. The most identified dominant species from TAC were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas geniculata and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However at species level, most of the identified microorganisms were farm specific. Almost all the isolates belonging to the three most abundant species were strong biofilm producers. Overall, 92% of all tested microorganisms were able to form biofilm under lab conditions. Furthermore, 63% of the DWS surfaces appeared to be contaminated with microorganisms combined with at least one of the analysed chemical components, which is indicative for the presence of biofilm. Conclusions Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas geniculata and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are considered as opportunistic pathogens and could consequently be a potential risk for animal health. Additionally, the biofilm-forming capacity of these organisms could promote attachment of other pathogens such as Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12866-019-1451-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Maes
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium
| | - Thijs Vackier
- Faculty of Engineering Technology, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M2S), Cluster for Bioengineering Technology (CBeT), Laboratory of Enzyme, Fermentation and Brewery Technology, University of Leuven, Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Son Nguyen Huu
- Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Industrial Biological Sciences, Ghent University Campus Kortrijk, Graaf Karel de Goedelaan 5, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marc Heyndrickx
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium.,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Poultry Diseases, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Hans Steenackers
- Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M2S), Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics (CMPG), University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20 box 2460, 3001, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Imca Sampers
- Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Industrial Biological Sciences, Ghent University Campus Kortrijk, Graaf Karel de Goedelaan 5, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Katleen Raes
- Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Industrial Biological Sciences, Ghent University Campus Kortrijk, Graaf Karel de Goedelaan 5, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Alex Verplaetse
- Faculty of Engineering Technology, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M2S), Cluster for Bioengineering Technology (CBeT), Laboratory of Enzyme, Fermentation and Brewery Technology, University of Leuven, Gebroeders De Smetstraat 1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen De Reu
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090, Melle, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu Y, Wang W, Xu J, Xue H, Stanford K, McAllister TA, Xu W. Evaluation of compost, vegetable and food waste as amendments to improve the composting of NaOH/NaClO-contaminated poultry manure. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0205112. [PMID: 30307982 PMCID: PMC6181338 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Regular usage of NaOH/NaClO disinfectants results in high sodium salt and alkalinity of poultry manure. This study compared three amendments: vegetable waste (V), food waste (F) and mature compost (C) for their ability to improve the composting of NaOH/NaClO-contaminated poultry manure. C compost resulted in the highest compost temperatures (p<0.001) and greatest reduction in OM, TC, TN and NH4-N (p<0.05). C and V composts were more efficient at lowering extractable-Na (ext-Na) and electrical conductivity (EC) than F (p<0.05). Maturity was primarily indicated by NH4-N, EC and ext-Na. Bacterial dynamics was profoundly influenced by NH4-N, EC and TC, with the decrease leading to discriminate genera shift from Sinibacillus and Thiopseudomonas to Brevbacterium, Brachybacterium, and Microbacterium. These findings suggest that mature compost was more desirable amendment than vegetable and food waste in the composting of NaOH/NaClO-contaminated poultry manure, and the decrease of ext-Na indicated compost maturity but did not influence bacterial dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Liu
- School of Food and Environment, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin campus, Panjin, China
| | - Wenxia Wang
- School of Food and Environment, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin campus, Panjin, China
| | - Jianqiang Xu
- School of Life Science and Medicine, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin campus, Panjin, China
- Panjin Industrial Technology Institute of Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, China
| | - Hongyu Xue
- School of Life Science and Medicine, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin campus, Panjin, China
| | - Kim Stanford
- Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Agriculture Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tim A. McAllister
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - Weiping Xu
- School of Food and Environment, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin campus, Panjin, China
- Panjin Industrial Technology Institute of Dalian University of Technology, Panjin, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de Castro Burbarelli MF, do Valle Polycarpo G, Deliberali Lelis K, Granghelli CA, Carão de Pinho AC, Ribeiro Almeida Queiroz S, Fernandes AM, Moro de Souza RL, Gaglianone Moro ME, de Andrade Bordin R, de Albuquerque R. Cleaning and disinfection programs against Campylobacter jejuni for broiler chickens: productive performance, microbiological assessment and characterization. Poult Sci 2018; 96:3188-3198. [PMID: 28854757 PMCID: PMC5850738 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Detailed cleaning and disinfection programs aims to reduce infection pressure from microorganisms from one flock to the next. However, studies evaluating the benefits to poultry performance, the sanitary status of the facilities, and the sanitary quality of the meat are rarely found. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate 2 cleaning and disinfecting programs regarding their influence on productive performance, elimination of Campylobacter, and characterization of Campylobacter jejuni strains when applied to broiler chickens’ facilities. Two subsequent flocks with 960 birds each were distributed into 32 pens containing 30 birds each. In the first, the whole flock was inoculated with a known strain of Campylobacter jejuni in order to contaminate the environment. In the second flock, performance and microbiological evaluations were done, characterizing an observational study between 2 cleaning and disinfection programs, regular and proposed. The regular program consisted of sweeping facilities, washing equipment and environment with water and neutral detergent. The proposed cleaning program consisted of dry and wet cleaning, application of 2 detergents (one acid and one basic) and 2 disinfectants (250 g/L glutaraldehyde and 185 g/L formaldehyde at 0.5% and 210 g/L para-chloro-meta-cresol at 4%). Total microorganism count in the environment and Campylobacter spp. identification were done for the microbiological assessment of the environment and carcasses. The positive samples were submitted to molecular identification of Campylobacter spp. and posterior genetic sequencing of the species identified as Campylobacter jejuni. The birds housed in the facilities and submitted to the proposed treatment had better performance when compared to the ones in the regular treatment, most likely because there was a smaller total microorganism count on the floor, walls, feeders and drinkers. The proposed program also resulted in a reduction of Campylobacter spp. on floors, drinkers and birds. Moreover, it was possible to identify 6 different Campylobacter jejuni strains in the facilities. The proposed treatment resulted in a positive influence on the birds’ performance and reduction of environment contamination for broiler chickens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Fernanda de Castro Burbarelli
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil.
| | | | - Karoline Deliberali Lelis
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| | - Carlos Alexandre Granghelli
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| | - Agatha Cristina Carão de Pinho
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| | - Sabrina Ribeiro Almeida Queiroz
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FZEA-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| | - Andrezza Maria Fernandes
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FZEA-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Luiz Moro de Souza
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FZEA-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| | - Maria Estela Gaglianone Moro
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FZEA-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| | | | - Ricardo de Albuquerque
- Department of Animal Nutrition and Production (VNP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ-USP), Pirassununga, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Catry B. Antimicrobial policies in animals and human health. Arch Public Health 2017; 75:62. [PMID: 29075486 PMCID: PMC5648479 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-017-0231-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
This invited commentary aims to highlight 3 recommendations to rationalize antimicrobial consumption in livestock, in order to minimize the spread of resistant bacteria and simultaneously safeguarding animal and public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boudewijn Catry
- Healthcare-Associated Infections & Antimicrobial Resistance, Operational Directorate of Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), J. Wytsmanstraat 14, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|