1
|
Cimini BA, Bankhead P, D'Antuono R, Fazeli E, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Fuster-Barceló C, Haase R, Jambor HK, Jones ML, Jug F, Klemm AH, Kreshuk A, Marcotti S, Martins GG, McArdle S, Miura K, Muñoz-Barrutia A, Murphy LC, Nelson MS, Nørrelykke SF, Paul-Gilloteaux P, Pengo T, Pylvänäinen JW, Pytowski L, Ravera A, Reinke A, Rekik Y, Strambio-De-Castillia C, Thédié D, Uhlmann V, Umney O, Wiggins L, Eliceiri KW. The crucial role of bioimage analysts in scientific research and publication. J Cell Sci 2024; 137:jcs262322. [PMID: 39475207 PMCID: PMC11698046 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.262322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Bioimage analysis (BIA), a crucial discipline in biological research, overcomes the limitations of subjective analysis in microscopy through the creation and application of quantitative and reproducible methods. The establishment of dedicated BIA support within academic institutions is vital to improving research quality and efficiency and can significantly advance scientific discovery. However, a lack of training resources, limited career paths and insufficient recognition of the contributions made by bioimage analysts prevent the full realization of this potential. This Perspective - the result of the recent The Company of Biologists Workshop 'Effectively Communicating Bioimage Analysis', which aimed to summarize the global BIA landscape, categorize obstacles and offer possible solutions - proposes strategies to bring about a cultural shift towards recognizing the value of BIA by standardizing tools, improving training and encouraging formal credit for contributions. We also advocate for increased funding, standardized practices and enhanced collaboration, and we conclude with a call to action for all stakeholders to join efforts in advancing BIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth A. Cimini
- Imaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Peter Bankhead
- Edinburgh Pathology, Centre for Genomic & Experimental Medicine and CRUK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Rocco D'Antuono
- Crick Advanced Light Microscopy STP, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AY, UK
| | - Elnaz Fazeli
- Biomedicum Imaging Unit, Faculty of Medicine and HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez
- Centre for Cellular Imaging, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Robert Haase
- Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (ScaDS.AI) Dresden/Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, 04105 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Helena Klara Jambor
- DAViS, University of Applied Sciences of the Grisons, 7000 Chur, Switzerland
| | - Martin L. Jones
- Electron Microscopy STP, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK
| | - Florian Jug
- Fondazione Human Technopole, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna H. Klemm
- Science for Life Laboratory BioImage Informatics Facility and Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, SE-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Kreshuk
- Cell Biology and Biophysics, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefania Marcotti
- Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics and Research Management & Innovation Directorate, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Gabriel G. Martins
- GIMM - Gulbenkian Institute for Molecular Medicine, R. Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Sara McArdle
- La Jolla Institute for Immunology,Microscopy Core Facility, San Diego, CA 92037, USA
| | - Kota Miura
- Bioimage Analysis & Research, BIO-Plaza 1062, Nishi-Furumatsu 2-26-22 Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-0927, Japan
| | | | - Laura C. Murphy
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Michael S. Nelson
- University of Wisconsin-Madison,Biomedical Engineering, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas Pengo
- Minnesota Supercomputing Institute,University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55005, USA
| | - Joanna W. Pylvänäinen
- Åbo Akademi University, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Biosciences, 20520 Turku, Finland
| | - Lior Pytowski
- Pixel Biology Ltd, 9 South Park Court, East Avenue, Oxford OX4 1YZ, UK
| | - Arianna Ravera
- Scientific Computing and Research Support Unit, University of Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Annika Reinke
- Division of Intelligent Medical Systems and Helmholtz Imaging, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yousr Rekik
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, IRIG, Laboratoire de chimie et de biologie des métaux, F-38000 Grenoble, France
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CEA, IRIG, Laboratoire Modélisation et Exploration des Matériaux, F-38000 Grenoble, France
| | | | - Daniel Thédié
- Institute of Cell Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK
| | | | - Oliver Umney
- School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Laura Wiggins
- University of Sheffield, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
| | - Kevin W. Eliceiri
- University of Wisconsin-Madison,Biomedical Engineering, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmidt C, Boissonnet T, Dohle J, Bernhardt K, Ferrando-May E, Wernet T, Nitschke R, Kunis S, Weidtkamp-Peters S. A practical guide to bioimaging research data management in core facilities. J Microsc 2024; 294:350-371. [PMID: 38752662 DOI: 10.1111/jmi.13317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
Bioimage data are generated in diverse research fields throughout the life and biomedical sciences. Its potential for advancing scientific progress via modern, data-driven discovery approaches reaches beyond disciplinary borders. To fully exploit this potential, it is necessary to make bioimaging data, in general, multidimensional microscopy images and image series, FAIR, that is, findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. These FAIR principles for research data management are now widely accepted in the scientific community and have been adopted by funding agencies, policymakers and publishers. To remain competitive and at the forefront of research, implementing the FAIR principles into daily routines is an essential but challenging task for researchers and research infrastructures. Imaging core facilities, well-established providers of access to imaging equipment and expertise, are in an excellent position to lead this transformation in bioimaging research data management. They are positioned at the intersection of research groups, IT infrastructure providers, the institution´s administration, and microscope vendors. In the frame of German BioImaging - Society for Microscopy and Image Analysis (GerBI-GMB), cross-institutional working groups and third-party funded projects were initiated in recent years to advance the bioimaging community's capability and capacity for FAIR bioimage data management. Here, we provide an imaging-core-facility-centric perspective outlining the experience and current strategies in Germany to facilitate the practical adoption of the FAIR principles closely aligned with the international bioimaging community. We highlight which tools and services are ready to be implemented and what the future directions for FAIR bioimage data have to offer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Schmidt
- Enabling Technology Department, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tom Boissonnet
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Julia Dohle
- Center of Cellular Nanoanalytics, Integrated Bioimaging Facility iBiOs, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Karen Bernhardt
- Center of Cellular Nanoanalytics, Integrated Bioimaging Facility iBiOs, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Elisa Ferrando-May
- Enabling Technology Department, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Tobias Wernet
- Life Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Roland Nitschke
- Life Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- CIBSS and BIOSS - Centres for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Kunis
- Center of Cellular Nanoanalytics, Integrated Bioimaging Facility iBiOs, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chorlton SD. Ten common issues with reference sequence databases and how to mitigate them. FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS 2024; 4:1278228. [PMID: 38560517 PMCID: PMC10978663 DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2024.1278228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Metagenomic sequencing has revolutionized our understanding of microbiology. While metagenomic tools and approaches have been extensively evaluated and benchmarked, far less attention has been given to the reference sequence database used in metagenomic classification. Issues with reference sequence databases are pervasive. Database contamination is the most recognized issue in the literature; however, it remains relatively unmitigated in most analyses. Other common issues with reference sequence databases include taxonomic errors, inappropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria, and sequence content errors. This review covers ten common issues with reference sequence databases and the potential downstream consequences of these issues. Mitigation measures are discussed for each issue, including bioinformatic tools and database curation strategies. Together, these strategies present a path towards more accurate, reproducible and translatable metagenomic sequencing.
Collapse
|