Transcriptional expression of m6A and m5C RNA methyltransferase genes in the brain and fat body of honey bee adult workers

RNA modifications in insects

More than 100 RNA chemical modifications to cellular RNA have been identified. N 6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent modification of mRNA. RNA modifications have recently attracted significant attention due to their critical role in regulating mRNA processing and metabolism. tRNA and rRNA rank among the most heavily modified RNAs, and their modifications are essential for maintaining their structure and function. With our advanced understanding of RNA modifications, increasing evidence suggests RNA modifications are important in regulating various aspects of insect life. In this review, we will summarize recent studies investigating the impact of RNA modifications in insects, particularly highlighting the role of m6A in insect development, reproduction, and adaptation to the environment.

The extensive m5C epitranscriptome of Thermococcus kodakarensis is generated by a suite of RNA methyltransferases that support thermophily

RNAs are often modified to invoke new activities. While many modifications are limited in frequency, restricted to non-coding RNAs, or present only in select organisms, 5-methylcytidine (m5C) is abundant across diverse RNAs and fitness-relevant across Domains of life, but the synthesis and impacts of m5C have yet to be fully investigated. Here, we map m5C in the model hyperthermophile, Thermococcus kodakarensis. We demonstrate that m5C is ~25x more abundant in T. kodakarensis than human cells, and the m5C epitranscriptome includes ~10% of unique transcripts. T. kodakarensis rRNAs harbor tenfold more m5C compared to Eukarya or Bacteria. We identify at least five RNA m5C methyltransferases (R5CMTs), and strains deleted for individual R5CMTs lack site-specific m5C modifications that limit hyperthermophilic growth. We show that m5C is likely generated through partial redundancy in target sites among R5CMTs. The complexity of the m5C epitranscriptome in T. kodakarensis argues that m5C supports life in the extremes.

N6-methyladenosine modification of RNA controls dopamine synthesis to influence labour division in ants

The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of RNA has been reported to remodel gene expression in response to environmental conditions; however, the biological role of m6A in social insects remains largely unknown. In this study, we explored the role of m6A in the division of labour by worker ants (Solenopsis invicta). We first determined the presence of m6A in RNAs from the brains of worker ants and found that m6A methylation dynamics differed between foragers and nurses. Depletion of m6A methyltransferase or chemical suppression of m6A methylation in foragers resulted in a shift to 'nurse-like' behaviours. Specifically, mRNAs of dopamine receptor 1 (Dop1) and dopamine transporter (DAT) were modified by m6A, and their expression increased dopamine levels to promote the behavioural transition from foragers to nurses. The abundance of Dop1 and DAT mRNAs and their stability were reduced by the inhibition of m6A modification caused by the silencing of Mettl3, suggesting that m6A modification in worker ants modulates dopamine synthesis, which regulates labour division. Collectively, our results provide the first example of the epitranscriptomic regulation of labour division in social insects and implicate m6A regulatory mechanism as a potential novel target for controlling red imported fire ants.

ALKBH8 as a potential N6 -methyladenosine (m6 A) eraser in insects

The N6 -methyladenosine (m6 A) machinery functions through three groups of proteins in eukaryotic cells, including m6 A writers, erasers and readers. The m6 A cellular machinery has mostly been characterised in mammalian species, and the relevant literature on insects is currently scant. While homologues of m6 A writers and readers have been reported from insects, no erasers have been described so far. Here, using BLAST search, we searched for potential erasers in insects. While we found homologues of human m6 A eraser ALKBH5 in termites, beetles and true bugs, they could not be found in representative dipteran and lepidopteran species. However, a potential m6 A eraser, ALKBH8, was identified and experimentally investigated. Our results showed that ALKBH8 can reduce the m6 A levels of Aedes aegypti and Drosophila melanogaster RNAs, suggesting that AeALKBH8 could be a candidate m6 A eraser in insects.

Exploring RNA methylation as a promising biomarker for assessing sublethal effects of fipronil on honeybees (Apis mellifera L.)

Honeybees play a crucial role as pollinators for crops and are regarded as sensitive bioindicators of environmental health. The widespread use of pesticides poses a severe threat to honeybee survival. However, there is limited information available on the specific risks associated with fipronil exposure in honeybees, particularly concerning the impact on RNA methylation throughout their lifespan. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sublethal concentrations of fipronil on RNA m⁶A and m⁵C methylations, along with the associated genes in honeybee larvae and newly emerged adults. LC-MS/MS analysis revealed a notable hypomethylation of m⁵C in larvae, while hypermethylation of m⁶A was observed in the adult brain. Significant changes in the expression of genes such as AmWTAP, AmYTHDF, AmALKBH4, AmALKBH6, AmALKBH8, AmNSUN5, AmNOP2, AmTET1, and AmYBX1 were observed in the adult brain, whereas alterations in the expression of AmNSUN2, AmMETTL14, AmALKBH1, AmALKBH4, AmALKBH6 AmALYREF, AmTET1, and AmYBX1 were observed in the larvae. Notably, the expression of AmALKBH1 was not detected in any fipronil-treated larvae, suggesting its potential as an early risk indicator for honeybee larvae in future assessments. This pioneering study provides insights into the effects of fipronil on RNA methylations in honeybees and explores the possibility of employing RNA methylation as a tool for assessing pesticide risks in this important pollinator species. These findings offer new perspectives on honeybee protection and the development of toxicity evaluation systems for pesticides.