Management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage in patients with ischemic stroke: An analysis using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database

BACKGROUND

The impact of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on the treatment of ischemic stroke remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in ischemic stroke patients using different NOACs versus warfarin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 2011 to 2019. Adults with ischemic stroke and no prior sICH or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding before anticoagulant initiation were included. Patients were grouped by anticoagulant type. Outcomes included sICH, GI bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and all-cause mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and odds ratios (aORs) were estimated using Cox and logistic regression models, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 3783 patients, those using dabigatran or edoxaban alone, or in combination with other NOACs, had a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality (aOR = 0.52, 0.52, and 0.57, respectively). Patients using rivaroxaban or apixaban alone had a lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (aHR = 0.68 and 0.64, respectively). Patients using rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or edoxaban alone, or in combination, had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (aHR = 0.78, 0.54, 0.49, and 0.51, respectively). In contrast, patients using apixaban alone or in combination with other NOACs had a higher risk of sICH (aHR = 1.38 and 2.12, respectively). Short-term NOAC use (≤30 days) was associated with increased sICH risk, whereas long-term use (>90 days) of rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or apixaban was associated with a reduced risk.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate selection and long-term use (over 90 days) of NOACs for ischemic stroke patients may improve outcomes.

The latest therapeutic advances with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 10% of strokes; however, compared with ischemic stroke, progress leading to novel treatments and improved patient outcomes has been lacking. Recently, there have been several promising developments and renewed research interest within the field. Positive results from randomized controlled trials have now been reported in multiple domains of care for patients with ICH. Anticoagulation-associated ICH is increasingly frequent, and clinicians deciding on reversal and timing of re-initiation of oral anticoagulation now have more therapeutic agents available and evidence to guide them. Minimally invasive techniques are also added to the neurosurgical arsenal, leading to improvements in functional outcomes. Acute treatment at presentation is best served by bundled care approaches, which ensure goal-directed management of blood pressure, glucose and temperature.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes the recent developments in this area, as well as the current recommendations of key international guidelines. Literature search was carried out using PubMed database with priority given to publications since 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

There is renewed optimism for innovation in ICH. The standard of care for this condition now leads to improvements in mortality and long-term functional ability. Efforts to improve the patient selection and surgical techniques for operative management are ongoing.

Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients: A Whole New Ballgame?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained supraventricular arrhythmia, particularly in older adults, with its incidence increasing dramatically with age. This condition is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality, being closely linked to an elevated risk of heart failure, ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, and dementia. The complexities of managing AF in the elderly arise from age-related physiological changes, comorbidities, frailty, and the challenges of polypharmacy. Therapeutic strategies must balance efficacy and safety, tailoring interventions to the individual's health status, life expectancy, and personal preferences. This review explores the latest evidence-based approaches to managing AF in elderly patients, focusing on the nuanced application of rate and rhythm control strategies, anticoagulation, and emerging insights into the relationship between AF and cognitive impairment.

A review of the use of oral anticoagulants in individuals with atrial fibrillation who had experienced intracranial hemorrhage in the past

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulants (OACs), including direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), have been shown to reduce these risks effectively. However, the administration of OACs carries a notable risk of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), a severe complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patients with a history of ICH face a complex decision regarding the resumption of anticoagulation therapy, as the likelihood of recurrence is heightened in this population. Current literature reveals inconsistencies in research findings regarding the safety and efficacy of restarting OACs after ICH. A lack of definitive guidelines addressing this issue leaves clinicians uncertain about optimal management strategies. This systematic review aims to analyze existing observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of resuming OACs in patients with AF who have experienced ICH. The review underscores the urgent need for high-quality research to inform clinical practices and develop comprehensive guidelines for managing anticoagulation therapy in this vulnerable group.

Advances in the medical treatment and diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), it entails expanding oral anticoagulants (OACs) use, carrying a higher risk of associated hemorrhagic events, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Despite advances in OACs development with a better safety profile and reversal agent for these anticoagulants, there is still no consensus on the optimal management of patients with OACs-associated ICH.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors have carried out an exhaustive search on the advances in recent years. The authors provide an update on the management of ICH in anticoagulated patients, as well as an update on the latest evidence on anticoagulation resumption, recent therapeutic strategies, and investigational drugs that could play a role in the future.

EXPERT OPINION

Following an ICH event in an anticoagulated patient, a comprehensive clinical evaluation is imperative. Anticoagulation should be promptly withdrawn and reversed. Once the patient is stabilized, a reintroduction of anticoagulation should be considered, typically within a timeframe of 4-8 weeks, if feasible. If re-anticoagulation is not possible, alternative options such as Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion are available.

Differences in global, regional, and national time trends in disability-adjusted life years for atrial fibrillation and flutter, 1990-2019: an age-period-cohort analysis from the 2019 global burden of disease study

Background

Atrial fibrillation and flutter, collectively referred to as AF/AFL, pose substantial public health challenges across nations of different economic statuses.

Abjective

This research is intended to assess the discrepancies in global, regional, and national trends in DALYs for atrial fibrillation and flutter throughout 1990 and 2019.

Methods

The GBD 2019 report included statistics on AF/AFL. An age-period-cohort (APC) model was used to calculate the changes in DALYs from ages 30 to 34 years up to 95 + years. The model calculated both net drifts and local drifts in DALYs. In addition, we analysed the relative risks for certain time periods and birth cohorts from 1990 to 2019 in order to assess their impact. In order to measure the changes over time in the age-standardized rate (ASR) of DALYs caused by AF/AFL, we calculated the average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) based on age, gender, socio-demographic index (SDI), and location. This approach enables us to analyse the impact of age, period, and cohort on trends in DALYs, which may uncover disparities in the management of AF/AFL.

Results

The global number of DALYs cases was 8,393,635 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 6,693,987 to 10,541,461], indicating a 121.6% rise (95% UI: 111.5 to 132.0) compared to 1990. From 1990 to 2019, the worldwide ASR of DALYs decreased by 2.61% (95% UI -6.9 to 1.3). However, the other SDI quintiles, except for high SDI and high-middle SDI, had an increase. During the last three decades, high-income nations in the Asia Pacific region had the most significant reduction in ASR of DALYs, whereas Central Asia experienced the highest rise (with a net drift of -0.9% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): -1.0 to -0.9] and 0.6% [95% CI: 0.5 to 0.7], respectively). Approximately 50% of the burden of AF/AFL has been transferred from areas with high and high-middle SDI to those with lower SDI. There was an inverse relationship between the AAPC and the SDI. In addition, men and older individuals were shown to have a greater burden of AF/AFL DALYs.

Conclusion

The findings of this research demonstrate that the worldwide impact of AF/AFL remains significant and increasing, with the burden differing depending on SDI. The exhaustive and comparable estimates provided by these results may contribute to international efforts to attain equitable AF/AFL control.

Multidisciplinary Approach in Atrial Fibrillation: As Good as Gold

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common sustained arrhythmia necessitating dual focus: acute complication management and sustained longitudinal oversight to modulate disease progression and ensure comprehensive patient care over time. AF is a multifaceted disorder; due to such a great number of potential exacerbating conditions, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) should manage AF patients by cooperating with a cardiologist. Effective management of AF patients necessitates the implementation of a well-coordinated and tailored care pathway aimed at delivering optimized treatment through collaboration among various healthcare professionals. Management of AF should be carefully evaluated and mutually agreed upon in consultation with healthcare providers. It is crucial to recognize that treatment may evolve due to the emergence of new risk factors, symptoms, disease progression, and advancements in treatment modalities. In the context of multidisciplinary AF teams, a coordinated approach involves assembling a diverse team tailored to meet individual patients' unique needs based on local services' availability.

Clinical outcomes of patients referred for left atrial appendage exclusion who did and did not undergo the procedure

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) is an effective alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Not all patients considered for LAAE undergo the procedure because of ineligibility, anatomic or medical constraints, and preference of the patient.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report on the management strategies and long-term clinical outcomes of patients referred to a dedicated multidisciplinary LAAE clinic, including all who subsequently did and did not undergo LAAE.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from all patients referred to the comprehensive multidisciplinary LAAE clinic at the University of Michigan between 2016 and 2022. A consecutive 301 patients (age, 75 ± 8 years; 106 women) with atrial fibrillation were evaluated. LAAE was performed in 168 patients (56%) with use of the Watchman device in 146 (49%) and surgically in 22 (7%). LAAE was not performed in 133 patients (44%, no-LAAE group) because of ineligibility in 62 (21%), anatomic constraints in 23 (7%), and preference of the patient in 48 (36%). The CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.1 ± 1.6; P = .002) and HAS-BLED score (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 1.1; P < .001) were higher in the LAAE groups.

RESULTS

Anticoagulant therapy was discontinued in 137 of 146 (94%) and 61 of 133 (61%) in the Watchman and no-LAAE groups, respectively (P < .001). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.0 years), in the LAAE (n = 168) and no-LAAE (n = 133) groups, respectively, 39 (23%) vs 29 (22%) deaths, 13 (8%) vs 5 (4%) thromboembolic events, and 24 (14%) vs 23 (17%) bleeding complications occurred. Continued long-term anticoagulation was not a predictor of clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

After a comprehensive evaluation in a multidisciplinary clinic, ∼50% of the patients referred for LAAE did not proceed with LAAE and resumed anticoagulation.

Exploring the Perioperative Use of DOACs, off the Beaten Track

A notable increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has been observed in the last decade. This trend has surpassed the prescription of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to the absence of the need for regular laboratory monitoring and the more favorable characteristics in terms of efficacy and safety. However, it is very common that patients on DOACs need an interventional or surgical procedure, requiring a careful evaluation and a challenging approach. Therefore, perioperative anticoagulation management of patients on DOACs represents a growing concern for clinicians. Indeed, while several surgical interventions require temporary discontinuation of DOACs, other procedures that involve a lower risk of bleeding can be conducted, maintaining a minimal or uninterrupted DOAC strategy. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of patient characteristics, including age, susceptibility to stroke, previous bleeding complications, concurrent medications, renal and hepatic function, and other factors, in addition to surgical considerations, is mandatory to establish the optimal discontinuation and resumption timing of DOACs. A multidisciplinary approach is required for managing perioperative anticoagulation in order to establish how to face these circumstances. This narrative review aims to provide physicians with a practical guide for DOAC perioperative management, addressing the most controversial issues.

Coagulation Tests and Reversal Agents in Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants: The Challenging Scenarios of Life-Threatening Bleeding and Unplanned Invasive Procedures

In clinical practice, the number of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has consistently increased over the years. Since anticoagulant therapy has been associated with an annual incidence of major bleeding (MB) events of approximately 2% to 3.5%, it is of paramount importance to understand how to manage anticoagulated patients with major or life-threatening bleeding. A considerable number of these patients' conditions necessitate hospitalization, and the administration of reversal agents may be imperative to manage and control bleeding episodes effectively. Importantly, effective strategies for reversing the anticoagulant effects of DOACs have been well recognized. Specifically, idarucizumab has obtained regulatory approval for the reversal of dabigatran, and andexanet alfa has recently been approved for reversing the effects of apixaban or rivaroxaban in patients experiencing life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding events. Moreover, continuous endeavors are being made to develop supplementary reversal agents. In emergency scenarios where specific reversal agents might not be accessible, non-specific hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrate can be utilized to neutralize the anticoagulant effects of DOACs. However, it is paramount to emphasize that specific reversal agents, characterized by their efficacy and safety, should be the preferred choice when suitable. Moreover, it is worth noting that adherence to the guidelines for the reversal agents is poor, and there is a notable gap between international recommendations and actual clinical practices in this regard. This narrative review aims to provide physicians with a practical approach to managing specific reversal agents.

Catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and absence of structural heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Introduction

Rhythm control strategy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) or catheter ablation (CA). Nevertheless, a clear overview of the percentage of freedom from AF over time and complications is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA versus AAD.

Methods

We searched databases up to 5 May 2023 for RCTs focusing on CA versus AAD. The study endpoints were atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence, progression to persistent AF, overall complications, stroke/TIA, bleedings, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality.

Results

Twelve RCTs enrolling 2393 patients were included. CA showed a significantly lower AT recurrence rate at one year [27.4 % vs 56.3 %; RR: 0.45; p < 0.00001], at two years [39.9 % vs 62.7 %; RR: 0.56; p = 0.0004] and at three years [45.7 % vs 80.9 %; RR: 0.54; p < 0.0001] compared to AAD. Furthermore, CA significantly reduced the progression to persistent AF [1.6 % vs 12.9 %; RR: 0.14; p < 0.00001] with no differences in overall complications [5.9 % vs 4.5 %; RR: 1.27; p = 0.22], stroke/TIA [0.6 % vs 0.6 %; RR: 1.10; p = 0.86], bleedings [0.4 % vs 0.6 %; RR: 0.90; p = 0.84], HF hospitalization [0,3% vs 0,7%; RR: 0.56; p = 0.37] and all-cause mortality [0,4% vs 0.5 %; RR: 0.78; p = 0.67]. Subgroup analysis between radiofrequency and cryo-ablation or considering RCTs with CA as first-line treatment showed no significant differences.

Conclusion

CA demonstrated lower rates of AT recurrence over the time, as well as a significant reduction in the progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF, with no difference in terms of energy source, complications, and clinical outcomes.

Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios

It is well established that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of anticoagulant strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) since they are superior or non-inferior to VKAs in reducing thromboembolic risk and are associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). In addition, many factors, such as fewer pharmacokinetic interactions and less need for monitoring, contribute to the favor of this therapeutic strategy. Although DOACs represent a more suitable option, several issues should be considered in clinical practice, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs), switching to other antithrombotic therapies, preprocedural and postprocedural periods, and the use in patients with chronic renal and liver failure and in those with cancer. Furthermore, adherence to DOACs appears to remain suboptimal. This narrative review aims to provide a practical guide for DOAC prescription and address challenging scenarios.