Hyperprolactinemia and Hypopituitarism in Acromegaly and Effect of Pituitary Surgery: Long-Term Follow-up on 529 Patients

Comparison of the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with different pathological types in acromegaly

Context

Acromegaly is caused by somatotroph tumors. Recently, the WHO recommended the use of transcription factors (TFs) together with pituitary hormones to accurately classify the subtypes.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate differences in the clinical and prognostic characteristics of acromegaly patients with different pathological types.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 94 acromegaly patients who underwent surgical treatment. Patients were classified into two groups on the basis of TFs expression by IHC. PIT1 tumors were positive only for PIT1, and PIT1/SF1 tumors were positive for both PIT1 and SF1. Additionally, on the basis of the expression of GH and PRL by IHC, PIT1 tumors were further subdivided into GH positive tumors (those positive for only GH) and GH/PRL positive tumors (those positive for both GH and PRL). Differences in clinical and prognostic features among the pathological groups were evaluated.

Results

PIT1/SF1 tumors represented 30.9% (n = 29) of the acromegaly patients in this cohort. PIT1/SF1 tumors had a higher baseline IGF-1 index (2.77 ± 0.73 vs. 2.39 ± 0.74, P = 0.024) than PIT1 tumors. Despite the higher proportion of postoperative GH < 1 μg/L, the biochemical remission rate of PIT1/SF1 tumors (30.8% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.812) was similar to that of PIT1 tumors. Compared with those with GH positive tumors, patients with GH/PRL positive tumors were younger at diagnosis (42.50 ± 13.36 vs. 49.05 ± 11.69, P = 0.046), and the proportion of male patients was higher (50.0% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.048). Furthermore, patients with GH/PRL positive tumors had a significantly higher postoperative GH level [7.30 (3.18-11.08) vs. 2.49 (1.57-6.84), P = 0.011] and IGF-1 index (1.82 ± 0.94 vs. 1.31 ± 0.63, P = 0.011) during follow-up. The biochemical remission rate in GH/PRL positive tumors was lower, but the difference was not statistically significant (18.2% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.159).

Conclusion

PIT1/SF1 tumors represent approximately 30.0% of acromegaly patients. Despite higher baseline IGF-1 levels, the clinical and prognostic features of patients with PIT1/SF1 tumors are similar to those of patients with PIT1 tumors. GH/PRL positive tumors, characterized by their earlier age at diagnosis and male predominance, tend to exhibit a lower biochemical remission rate compared to GH positive tumors.

Clinical characteristics and pathological features of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma combined with hyperprolactinemia

PURPOSE

Large-scale reports on growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas (GHPA) with hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) remain limited. The relationship between clinical characteristics and pathological subtypes of GHPA patients, based on the 2022 classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET), has rarely been elucidated. This study aims to enhance the understanding of clinicopathological features in GHPA and clarify differences between patients with and without HPRL.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 810 patients diagnosed with GHPA. The clinical and pathological characteristics were compared between the HPRL and non-HPRL groups. Patients were categorized according to 2022 pathological classification and their differences were compared.

RESULTS

Compared to the non-HPRL group, the HPRL group exhibited more visual acuity/field impairment and galactorrhea and had higher GH levels. The tumor volume (TV) in the HPRL group was significantly larger, with more severe cavernous sinus invasion and optic chiasm compression, and a higher proportion of mammosomatotroph PitNETs. The most common pathological types of GHPA included sparsely granulated somatotroph PitNETs (46.19%), mammosomatotroph PitNETs (17.37%), and plurihormonal PitNETs (17.80%). Patients with immature PIT-1 lineage PitNETs had the lowest biochemical remission rate and highest tumor residual/recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

The symptoms of galactorrhea and visual acuity/field impairment contribute to early diagnosis in GHPA patients with HPRL. Although TV is larger and invasiveness is greater, HPRL does not significantly affect the biochemical remission rate. Nearly half of GHPA cases are sparsely granulated somatotroph PitNETs, which are often associated with poor tumor outcomes, highlighting the critical role of pathological type in predicting clinical prognosis.

Predictors of growth hormone level on postoperative day one in patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

The growth hormone (GH) level on postoperative day one (POD1), i.e., POD1GH, holds significant value in assessing surgical efficacy and predicting long-term remission in patients with acromegaly. This study aims to explore the factors that influence the GH level of POD1 after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (mTSS) in patients with acromegaly, providing insights for preoperative clinical decisions.

METHODS

A total of 85 acromegaly patients undergoing mTSS were included in this study. Sex; age; body mass index (BMI); preoperative serum hormone levels and tumor characteristics were assessed for their correlation with POD1GH levels. POD1GH level non-remission, defined as POD1GH > 2.5 ng/mL, was considered an outcome.

RESULTS

The patients with acromegaly were divided into two groups: adult males (43 cases) and adult females (42 cases), with mean ages of 43.33 ± 11.92 years and 47.02 ± 14.18 years, respectively. Correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses revealed positive correlations of preoperative GH and prolactin (PRL) levels in females with POD1GH levels, while preoperative FT3 and TT levels in males were negatively correlated with POD1GH levels. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses identified preoperative GH levels ≥30.25 ng/mL (OR = 2.236, 95%CI = 1.402-3.567, p < 0.001), FT3 levels ≤4.415 pmol/L (OR = 0.329, 95%CI = 0.167-0.648, p < 0.001), and age ≤51 years (OR = 0.566, 95%CI = 0.352-0.911, p = 0.019) as independent risk factors for POD1GH level non-remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative GH, FT3, TT, and PRL levels are correlated with POD1GH levels, with variations observed between sex. Age, preoperative GH, and FT3 levels can predict POD1GH level non-remission. Therefore, the comprehensive consideration of multiple hormone axes is necessary for predicting postoperative efficacy.

Cancer screening in patients with acromegaly: a plea for a personalized approach and international registries

Acromegaly is a rare condition, and often diagnosis is delayed by several years, for most patients. Acromegaly is characterized by short and long-term respiratory, cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, with possible impact on mortality. In the last two decades, life expectancy has progressively increased in part due to a reduction in biochemically active disease, multidisciplinary treatment approaches and a reduction in complications, and the availability of new drugs. Of note, a leading cause of mortality, cardiovascular comorbidity, has been replaced by cancer(s). As such, neoplasms more frequently observed (colon, thyroid, breast, prostate, and stomach) in patients with acromegaly are receiving increased attention. Chronic exposure to increased growth hormone serum levels may contribute to an increase in the occurrence and progression of cancers. Various efforts have been made to determine the pathogenetic mechanisms involved. However, there are no clear medical-related societal agreement(s) in relation to screening methods or timing regarding neoplasm(s) diagnosis in patients with acromegaly. Additionally, independent and dependent risk factor data in patients with acromegaly is lacking. International/national registries could help lay the groundwork to better study the impact of cancer(s) in patients with acromegaly and subsequently lead to and validate the most appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic path forward.

Differences Between GH- and PRL-Cosecreting and GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: a Series of 604 Cases

CONTEXT

Few data exist about the clinical course of acromegaly, surgical and medical outcomes in patients with GH- and prolactin cosecreting pituitary adenomas (GH&PRL-PAs). Nevertheless, some series described a more aggressive clinic-radiological behavior than in growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH-PAs).

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to evaluate differences in clinical presentation and in surgical outcomes between GH-PAs and GH&PRL-PAs.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted of 604 patients with acromegaly who underwent pituitary surgery. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to serum PRL levels at diagnosis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PRL: a) GH&PRL-PAs when PRL levels were above the upper limit of normal (ULN) and IHC for GH and PRL was positive or PRL levels were greater than 100 ng/dL and PRL IHC was not available (n = 130) and b) GH-PA patients who did not meet the previously mentioned criteria (n = 474).

RESULTS

GH&PRL-PAs represented 21.5% (n = 130) of patients with acromegaly. The mean age at diagnosis was lower in GH&PRL-PAs than in GH-PAs (P < .001). GH&PRL-PAs were more frequently macroadenomas (90.6% vs 77.4%; P = .001) and tended to be more invasive (33.6% vs 24.7%; P = .057) than GH-PAs. Furthermore, they had presurgical hypopituitarism more frequently (odds ratio 2.8; 95% CI, 1.83-4.38). Insulin-like growth factor ULN levels at diagnosis were lower in patients with GH&PRL-PAs (median 2.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.73-3.29] vs 2.7 [IQR 1.91-3.67]; P = .023). There were no differences in the immediate (41.1% vs 43.3%; P = .659) or long-term postsurgical acromegaly biochemical cure rate (53.5% vs 53.1%; P = .936) between groups. However, there was a higher incidence of permanent arginine-vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) (7.3% vs 2.4%; P = .011) in GH&PRL-PA patients.

CONCLUSION

GH&PRL-PAs are responsible for 20% of acromegaly cases. These tumors are more invasive, larger, and cause hypopituitarism more frequently than GH-PAs and are diagnosed at an earlier age. The biochemical cure rate is similar between both groups, but patients with GH&PRL-PAs tend to develop permanent postsurgical AVP-D more frequently.

Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics of patients with acromegaly according to tumor size at diagnosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical, laboratory, radiological, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics of patients with acromegaly according to the size of the growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma at diagnosis.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, single-center study of patients with acromegaly followed at a tertiary center. Data were collected regarding clinical presentation, characteristics of the adenoma in the magnetic resonance imaging, GH and IGF-1 levels, and disease control after surgery or adjuvant treatment (normal IGF-1 levels). Patients were divided according to the adenoma size at diagnosis in: group I < 10 mm; II 10-19 mm; III 20-29 mm; IV 30-39 mm; and V ≥ 40 mm. Comparisons were made between the groups, and correlations of tumor size with disease parameters, ROC curves, and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate tumor size and confounding factors that could impact the outcomes.

RESULTS

117 patients were studied [59 women, age at diagnosis 43 ± 13 years; group I = 11 patients (9%); group II 54 (46%); group III 34 (29%); group IV 10 (9%); group V 8 (7%)]. Hypopituitarism, cavernous sinus invasion, GH levels, and use of somatostatin receptor ligands had their prevalence increased according to the adenoma size. Age showed a negative correlation with tumor size. A tumor diameter around 20 mm was the best predictor for the presence of hypopituitarism, invasiveness, need of adjuvant therapies, and poorer disease control.

CONCLUSION

Adenomas < 20 mm showed lower morbidity and better therapeutic response in acromegaly, while those ≥ 20 mm had similar clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic behavior.

Medical treatment of acromegaly - When the tumor size matters: A narrative review

Medical treatment of acromegaly is generally positioned as a second line of treatment after pituitary adenoma surgery. With the rising availability and variety of medications for acromegaly increases our understanding of their effectiveness and safety. Volume of the published data on the impact of medical therapy on biochemical control of acromegaly, contrasts a relative lack of publications which comprehensively address pituitary tumor alterations under different drug modalities. Assessment of changes in GH-secreting adenoma volume is often overshadowed by clinicians' focus on GH and IGF-I levels during acromegaly treatment. Close analysis of studies published in the last two decades, reveals that both an increase and decrease in somatotropinoma volume are possible during treatment with any of available drugs for acromegaly. Changes in pituitary tumor size may arise from the biological nature of adenoma itself, independently of the administered medications. Therefore, an individual approach is necessary in the treatment of patients with acromegaly, based on repeated insight to their clinical, biochemical, pathological and imaging characteristics. In this review, we summarize and comment how pituitary tumor size is affected by the treatment with all currently available drugs in acromegaly: long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands of the first generation (octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel) and the second generation (pasireotide-LAR), as well as pegvisomant (PEG) and cabergoline (CAB).

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline.

CONCLUSION

In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

Pregnancy and acromegaly: clinical outcomes of retrospectively analysed data from the German acromegaly registry

CONTEXT

Acromegaly is a rare disease caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion, mostly induced by pituitary adenomas. The care of pregnant women with acromegaly is challenging, in part due to existing clinical data being limited and not entirely consistent with regard to potential risks for mother and child.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively examine data on pregnancy and maternal as well as neonatal outcomes in patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN & METHODS

Retrospective data analysis from 47 pregnancies of 31 women treated in centers of the German Acromegaly Registry.

RESULTS

87.1% of the studied women underwent transsphenoidal surgery before pregnancy. In 51.1% a combination of dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs were used before pregnancy. Three women did not receive any therapy for acromegaly. During pregnancy only 6.4% received either somatostatin analogs or dopamine agonists. In total, 70.2% of all documented pregnancies emerged spontaneously. Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 10.6% and gravid hypertension in 6.4%. Overall, no preterm birth was detected. Indeed, 87% of acromegalic women experienced a delivery without complications.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancies in women with acromegaly are possible and the course of pregnancy is in general safe for mother and child both with and without specific treatment for acromegaly. The prevalence of concomitant metabolic diseases such as gestational diabetes is comparable to the prevalence in healthy pregnant women. Nevertheless, larger studies with more data in pregnant patients with acromegaly are needed to provide safe and effective care for pregnant women with this condition.

Successful medical management of a pituitary macroadenoma with features of resistant acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia using pasireotide

BACKGROUND

The somatostatin analog, pasireotide, is used for the treatment of acromegaly after the failure of surgery and/or first-line medical treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 48-year-old male reported that during a workup for obesity in his home country, hyperprolactinemia was diagnosed and a 3.5 × 3.5 cm pituitary macroadenoma was identified on pituitary MRI. He received cabergoline for 6 months; then he was lost to follow-up. He presented at our Endocrine clinic 2 years later for treatment of obesity (BMI 49.5 kg/m2). Biochemical workup revealed that in addition to hyperprolactinemia (7,237 [normal: 85-323 mIU/L), he had acromegaly, evident by elevated insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level (450 [normal: 88-210 µg/L]), and a positive growth hormone suppression test, secondary hypothyroidism, and secondary hypogonadism. Pituitary MRI showed that the adenoma encased parts of the left and right internal carotid arteries and encroached on the optic chiasm. Surgical excision was therefore not feasible. He was treated with cabergoline and later, long-acting release (LAR) octreotide. Prolactin levels were reduced with cabergoline, but IGF-1 levels did not respond to octreotide, and it was discontinued. The patient abandoned radiotherapy after two sessions. He was started on LAR pasireotide 40 mg every 4 weeks and continued on cabergoline 0.5 mg per week. His biochemical response was dramatic, with a near normalization of IGF-1 levels in 3 months. After 6 months from starting pasireotide, we increased cabergoline dose from 0.5 mg/week to 3 mg/week. Three months later, IGF-1 level was normalized. The patient developed type 2 diabetes as a side effect of pasireotide; however, this was well-controlled with medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The case suggests that pasireotide can provide marked biochemical improvement in acromegaly after the failure of both cabergoline monotherapy and cabergoline plus octreotide. This further confirms a potentially efficacious treatment regimen in treatment-resistant acromegaly with hyperprolactinemia.

Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of acromegalic patients with giant growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: a single-center study of 67 cases

PURPOSE

Acromegalic patients with giant growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas (GHPAs) (≥ 40 mm) are relatively rare, and their clinical characteristics and treatment outcome data are limited. This study aims to analyze the clinical practice experience of giant GHPAs.

METHODS

Sixty-seven acromegalic patients with giant GHPAs and 67 patients with macro GHPAs (10-39 mm), matched for age and gender from the same hospital during the same period, were retrospectively recruited. The clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Enlargement of the extremities and facial features were the most common symptoms in most patients (92.5%). Compared with the macroadenoma group, more frequent visual impairment (86.6% vs. 25.4%, P < 0.001) and gonadal axis dysfunction (49.3% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.008), higher preoperative fasting GH, nadir GH after OGTT and IGF-1 levels, and a higher proportion of extrasellar tumor invasion were seen in the giant adenoma group. As the adenoma size increases, the total resection rate decreases, and postoperative complications and multimodal treatment strategies increase significantly. Fasting and nadir GH levels remained higher at 1 week postoperatively, and there were more surgical complications and cases of anterior hypopituitarism in the giant group. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 12 patients (36.4%) in the giant GHPA group and 17 (36.2%) in the macro GHPA group achieved biochemical remission. Other factors such as age of onset, age of diagnosis, delayed diagnosis time, metabolic complications, p53 positive rate, and Ki-67 index showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With aggressive multimodal therapy, the biochemical remission rate of acromegalic patients with giant GHPAs is comparable to that of patients with macro adenoma. However, postoperative complications and hypopituitarism need to be closely monitored.

Preoperative and postoperative blood testosterone levels in patients with acromegaly: a prospective study

Purpose

To investigate the prevalence of low blood testosterone level (LTL) and its determinant factors among active male acromegaly patients, as well as the effect of surgery on LTL in male acromegaly patients.

Methods

A retrospective, single-center study focused on 252 male acromegaly patients aged 18 years-60 years diagnosed in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 was carried out. The measurements of preoperative and postoperative testosterone levels, serum growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and other clinical data were analyzed.

Results

Forty per cent of subjects included were diagnosed with LTL pre surgery. Patients were divided into normal testosterone level (NTL) and LTL groups based on their testosterone level. There were significant differences (p < 0.01) between groups in the presence of macroadenomas, invasion of the cavernous sinus, compression of the optic chiasm, and serum GH and prolactin levels pre surgery. Invasion of the cavernous sinus [odds ratio (OR) = 4.299; p = 0.000] and serum prolactin level (OR = 1.023, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of LTLs in male patients before surgical intervention. A total of 67.9% of LTL patients recovered during the follow-up, with a new-onset rate of 3.4%. Body mass index, invasion of the cavernous sinus, GH, IGF-1, and prolactin levels, the presence of a prolactin-secreting tumor, and recovery from acromegaly were significantly different (p < 0.05) in the NTL group and in the LTL group during the follow-up. The presence of a prolactin-secreting tumor (OR = 0.224; p = 0.001) and recovery from acromegaly (OR = 0.168; p = 0.006) were independent predictors of LTLs in male acromegaly patients during the follow-up.

Conclusion

The invasiveness of tumor and levels of blood prolactin are independent factors for LTLs before surgery, whereas GH and IGF-1 levels are not. Most male patients can recover from LTL after tumor restriction surgery: those who recover from acromegaly have a better chance of recovering from LTL.

[Acromegaly screening in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma]

BACKGROUND

Hyperprolactinemia accompanies growth hormone hypersecretion in approximately 25-39% of cases. There is a recommendation to determine the level of prolactin in clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. However, there is no understanding of the necessity to investigate the IGF-1 level in patients with hyperprolactinemia and a pituitary adenoma.

AIM

Determining the proportion of patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma, who were examined for IGF-1 levels, and identifying the proportion of patients with acromegaly among this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2019 and December 2022 a single-center observational single-stage single-sample uncontrolled study was conducted. At the first stage of the study, the proportion of patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia with studied IGF-1 levels was determined, according to medical records. At the second stage of the study, patients without known indicators of IGF-1 were determined. The concentration of growth hormone was studied during the oral glucose load in the case of increased IGF-1 levels.

RESULTS

At the first stage, 105 patients were included in the study. The level of IGF-1 was determined in 41/105 (39%) cases. There were 22/41 (53.7%) cases in the subgroup with pituitary incidentalomas and 19/64 (29.7%) cases in the subgroup with hyperprolactinemia among them. At the second stage, the IGF-1 level was additionally determined in 53 patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma (total 94 patients). The level of IGF-1 was elevated in 11/94 patients, further acromegaly was confirmed in 3/94 patients (3.2%).

CONCLUSION

In real clinical practice the level of IGF-1 is studied only in 39% of cases in patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia. The disease was detected in 3 cases (3.2%) out of 94 people with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma without clinical manifestations of acromegaly. We consider the study of IGF-1 levels justified as a screening for acromegaly in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma.

Prolactin and Growth Hormone Signaling and Interlink Focused on the Mammosomatotroph Paradigm: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) are peptide hormones that bind to the class 1 cytokine receptor superfamily, a highly conserved cell surface class of receptors. Both hormones control their own secretion via a negative autocrine loop in their own mammosomatotroph, lactotroph or somatotroph. In this regard, GH and PRL are regulated by similar signaling pathways involving cell growth and hormone secretion. Thus, GH and PRL dysregulation and pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) development may have common pathogenic pathways. Based on cell linage, lactotroph and somatotroph PitNETs come from pituitary-specific POU-class homeodomain transcription factor (Pit-1). Mammosomatotroph and plurihormonal PitNETs are a unique subtype of PitNETs that arise from a single-cell population of Pit-1 lineage. In contrast, mixed somatotroph-lactotroph PitNETs are composed of two distinct cell populations: somatotrophs and lactotrophs. Morphologic features that distinguish indolent PitNETs from locally aggressive ones are still unidentified, and no single prognostic parameter can predict tumor aggressiveness or treatment response. In this review, we aim to explore the latest research on lactotroph and somatotroph PitNETs, the molecular mechanisms involved in PRL and GH axis regulation and the signaling pathways involved in their aggressiveness, particularly focused on mammosomatotroph and mixed subtypes. Finally, we summarize epidemiological, clinical, and radiological features of these exceptional tumors. We aim to shed light, from basic to clinical settings, on new perspectives and scientific gaps in this field.

The effect of endoscopic transsphenoidal somatotroph tumors resection on pituitary hormones: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Currently, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is the main treatment for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Excision of the tumor may have positive or negative effects on pituitary endocrine function, and the pituitary function of somatotroph tumors is a point of particular concern after the operation. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis on the effect of endoscopic transsphenoidal somatotroph tumor resection on pituitary function.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted for articles that included the evaluation of pituitary target gland before and after endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary tumor resection and were published between 1992 and 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane, and Ovid MEDLINE.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies that included biochemical remission rates in 4524 somatotroph tumors were concluded. According to the 2000 consensus, the biochemical remission rate after transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery was 66.4% (95% CI, 0.622-0.703; P = 0.000), the biochemical remission rate was 56.2% according to the 2010 consensus (95% CI, 0.503-0.620; P = 0.041), and with the rate of biochemical remission ranging from 30.0 to 91.7% with investigator's definition. After endoscopic resection, adrenal axis dysfunction was slightly higher than that before surgery, but the difference was not statistically significant. Hypothyroidism was 0.712 times higher risk than that before surgery (OR = 0.712; 95% CI, 0.527-0.961; P = 0.027). Hypogonadism was 0.541 times higher risk than that before surgery (OR = 0.541; 95% CI, 0.393-0.746; P = 0.000). Hyperprolactinemia was 0.131 times higher risk than that before surgery (OR = 0.131; 95% CI, 0.022-0.783; P = 0.026). The incidence of pituitary insufficiency was 1.344 times the risk before surgery after endoscopic resection of somatotroph tumors, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with somatotroph tumors after undergoing endoscopic surgery, the risk of dysfunction and pituitary insufficiency tend to increase, while preoperative thyroid insufficiency, gonadal insufficiency, and hyperprolactinemia will be partially relieved.

Approach of Acromegaly during Pregnancy

Acromegaly-related sub/infertility, tidily related to suboptimal disease control (1/2 of cases), correlates with hyperprolactinemia (1/3 of patients), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism—mostly affecting the pituitary axis in hypopituitarism (10−80%), and negative effects of glucose profile (GP) anomalies (10−70%); thus, pregnancy is an exceptional event. Placental GH (Growth Hormone) increases from weeks 5−15 with a peak at week 37, stimulating liver IGF1 and inhibiting pituitary GH secreted by normal hypophysis, not by somatotropinoma. However, estrogens induce a GH resistance status, protecting the fetus form GH excess; thus a full-term, healthy pregnancy may be possible. This is a narrative review of acromegaly that approaches cardio-metabolic features (CMFs), somatotropinoma expansion (STE), management adjustment (MNA) and maternal-fetal outcomes (MFOs) during pregnancy. Based on our method (original, in extenso, English—published articles on PubMed, between January 2012 and September 2022), we identified 24 original papers—13 studies (3 to 141 acromegalic pregnancies per study), and 11 single cases reports (a total of 344 pregnancies and an additional prior unpublished report). With respect to maternal acromegaly, pregnancies are spontaneous or due to therapy for infertility (clomiphene, gonadotropins or GnRH) and, lately, assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs); there are no consistent data on pregnancies with paternal acromegaly. CMFs are the most important complications (7.7−50%), especially concerning worsening of HBP (including pre/eclampsia) and GP anomalies, including gestational diabetes mellitus (DM); the best predictor is the level of disease control at conception (IGF1), and, probably, family history of 2DM, and body mass index. STE occurs rarely (a rate of 0 to 9%); some of it symptoms are headache and visual field anomalies; it is treated with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) or alternatively dopamine agonists (DAs); lately, second trimester selective hypophysectomy has been used less, since pharmaco-therapy (PT) has proven safe. MNA: PT that, theoretically, needs to be stopped before conception—continued if there was STE or an inoperable tumor (no clear period of exposure, preferably, only first trimester). Most data are on octreotide > lanreotide, followed by DAs and pegvisomant, and there are none on pasireotide. Further follow-up is required: a prompt postpartum re-assessment of the mother’s disease; we only have a few data confirming the safety of SSAs during lactation and long-term normal growth and developmental of the newborn (a maximum of 15 years). MFO seem similar between PT + ve and PT − ve, regardless of PT duration; the additional risk is actually due to CMF. One study showed a 2-year median between hypophysectomy and pregnancy. Conclusion: Close surveillance of disease burden is required, particularly, concerning CMF; a personalized approach is useful; the level of statistical evidence is expected to expand due to recent progress in MNA and ART.