ALT-803 in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Preclinical and clinical evidence and translational potential

A comprehensive review on targeting diverse immune cells for anticancer therapy: Beyond immune checkpoint inhibitors

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, primary resistance and acquired resistance continue to limit their efficacy for many patients. To address resistance and enhance the anti-tumor activity within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), numerous therapeutic strategies targeting both innate and adaptive immune cells have emerged. These include combination therapies with ICIs, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T), chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-Ms) or chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cell (CAR-NK) therapy, colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitors, dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, cytokine therapies, and chemokine inhibition. These approaches underscore the significant potential of the TIME in cancer treatment. This article provides a comprehensive and up-to-date review of the mechanisms of action of various innate and adaptive immune cells within the TIME, as well as the therapeutic strategies targeting each immune cell type, aiming to deepen the understanding of their therapeutic potential.

A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2024

The US Food and Drug Administration approved 50 new drugs and nine new cellular and gene therapy products in 2024, i.e., a total of 59 new medical therapies. The latter group represented three treatments each for oncology and hematology/immunotherapy, and one each for neurology, genetic disorders, and cardiovascular disorders. Oncology, hematology/immunotherapy, and neurological disorders (14, six, and seven, respectively) also were highly prevalent among classic medications. Looking at trends over the past 5 years, we observe a greater share in first-in-class medications, more fast-track approvals, and mRNA/gene/cell-based therapies. While small molecules remain the largest fraction, their percentage has been declining substantially over the past 5 years. Taking together, these findings testify to the commitment of the pharmaceutical industry for innovative treatments, including conditions for which no approved therapies existed. On the other hand, there also is a trend for approvals for narrowly focused conditions such as tumors defined by genetic alterations.

The role of immunotherapy in targeting tumor microenvironment in genitourinary cancers

Genitourinary (GU) cancers, including renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and testicular cancer, represent a significant health burden and are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite advancements in traditional treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, the complex interplay within the tumor microenvironment (TME) poses substantial hurdles to achieving durable remission and cure. The TME, characterized by its dynamic and multifaceted nature, comprises various cell types, signaling molecules, and the extracellular matrix, all of which are instrumental in cancer progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Recent breakthroughs in immunotherapy (IO) have opened a new era in the management of GU cancers, offering renewed hope by leveraging the body's immune system to combat cancer more selectively and effectively. This approach, distinct from conventional therapies, aims to disrupt cancer's ability to evade immune detection through mechanisms such as checkpoint inhibition, therapeutic vaccines, and adoptive cell transfer therapies. These strategies highlight the shift towards personalized medicine, emphasizing the importance of understanding the intricate dynamics within the TME for the development of targeted treatments. This article provides an in-depth overview of the current landscape of treatment strategies for GU cancers, with a focus on IO targeting the specific cell types of TME. By exploring the roles of various cell types within the TME and their impact on cancer progression, this review aims to underscore the transformative potential of IO strategies in TME targeting, offering more effective and personalized treatment options for patients with GU cancers, thereby improving outcomes and quality of life.

Engineered VNP20009 expressing IL-15&15Rα augments anti-tumor immunity for bladder cancer treatment

Surgical resection combined with intravesical instillation of chemotherapeutics or Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to remove residual cancer cells is the gold standard for the clinical treatment of patients with bladder cancer. In a recent clinical trial, a new super-agonist complex of IL-15 - N803, has shown promising results when used in combination with BCG to treat patients with bladder cancer who do not respond to BCG. Herein, we used temperature-controlled pBV220 plasmid encoding Interleukin-15 and its receptor alpha subunit (IL-15&15Rα) to transform VNP20009, an attenuated salmonella typhimurium strain, obtaining engineered bacteria named 15&15Rα@VNP. After induction at 42 °C, 15&15Rα@VNP can secrete functional IL-15&15Rα stably. It was found that intravesical instillation of thermally activated 15&15Rα@VNP could inhibit the growth of bladder tumors if used alone. Moreover, the sequential intravesical instillation of epirubicin (EPI), a first-line bladder cancer drug, followed by thermally activated 15&15Rα@VNP, could achieve further improved therapeutic responses, without causing significant side effects. Therefore, this study shows that 15&15Rα@VNP can be effectively used in the treatment of bladder cancer and can be used as a complementary therapy to chemotherapy agents, promising for potential clinical translation in bladder cancer treatment.

IL15/IL15Rα complex induces an anti-tumor immune response following radiation therapy only in the absence of Tregs and fails to induce expansion of progenitor TCF1+ CD8 T cells

Background

This work seeks to understand whether IL15-incorporating treatments improve response to radiotherapy and uncover mechanistic rationale for overcoming resistance to IL15 agonism using novel therapeutic combinations.

Experimental Design

Orthotopic tumor models of PDAC were used to determine response to treatment. IL15-/- and Rag1-/- mouse models were employed to determine dependence on IL15 and CTLs, respectively. Flow cytometry was used to assess immune cell frequency and activation state. Phospho-proteomic analyses were used to characterize intracellular signaling pathways.

Results

We show that the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and an IL15/IL15Ra fusion complex (denoted IL15c) fails to confer anti-tumor efficacy; however, a CD8-driven anti-tumor immune response is elicited with the concurrent administration of an aCD25 Treg-depleting antibody. Using IL15-/- and Rag1-/- mice, we demonstrate that response to RT + IL15c + aCD25 is dependent on both IL15 and CTLs. Furthermore, despite an equivalent survival benefit following treatment with RT + IL15c + aCD25 and combination RT + PD1-IL2v, a novel immunocytokine with PD-1 and IL2Rβγ binding domains, CTL immunophenotyping and phospho-proteomic analysis of intracellular metabolites showed significant upregulation of activation and functionality in CD8 T cells treated with RT + PD1-IL2v. Finally, we show the immunostimulatory response to RT + PD1-IL2v is significantly diminished with a concurrent lack of TCF+ CD8 T cell generation in the absence of functional IL15 signaling.

Conclusions

Our results are illustrative of a mechanism wherein unimpeded effector T cell activation through IL2Rβ signaling and Treg inhibition are necessary in mediating an anti-tumor immune response.

Epigenetic changes associated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) treatment in bladder cancer

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is an established immunotherapeutic, however, a significant portion of patients do not respond to treatment. Despite extensive research into the therapeutic mechanism of BCG, gaps remain in our understanding. This review specifically focuses on the epigenomic contributions in the immune microenvironment, in the context of BCG treatment for NMIBC. We also summarise the current understanding of NMIBC epigenetic characteristics, and discuss how future targeted strategies for BCG therapy should incorporate epigenomic biomarkers in conjunction with genomic biomarkers.

Recent Advances in Drug Delivery Strategies for High-Risk BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Brief Review from 2018 to 2024

High-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a condition that is typically treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. Unfortunately, NMIBC is characterized by high recurrence, with a significant percentage of BCG patients ultimately requiring radical cystectomy. As a consequence, the development of effective new therapies to avoid RC has become a rapidly evolving field to address this unmet clinical need. To date, three biologics-Keytruda, Adstiladrin, and Anktiva-have been approved by the FDA, and multiple drug modalities, particularly gene therapies, have shown promising results in clinical trials. Advances in drug delivery strategies, such as targeted delivery, sustained release, and permeabilization of protective layers, are critical in overcoming the challenges posed by therapeutic intervention in bladder cancer. This review focuses on high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC therapies that have been or are currently being investigated in clinical trials, offering a broad overview of the delivery system designs and up-to-date clinical outcomes that have been reported as of July 2024. It aims to inform the development of future drug delivery systems for second-line therapies in high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

Developments in conservative treatment for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

To reduce the risk of disease recurrence and progression of intermediate and high-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers (NMIBCs), intravesical adjuvant treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) represents the standard of care, although up to 50% of patients will eventually recur and up to 20% of them will progress to Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC). Radical Cystectomy (RC) is the treatment of choice in this setting; however, this represents a major and morbid surgery, thus meaning that not all NMIBCs patient could undergo or may refuse this procedure or may refuse. The search for effective bladder sparing strategies in NMIBCs BCG-unresponsive patients is a hot topic in the urologic field.

AREAS COVERED

We aimed to review the most important bladder-preserving strategies for BCG unresponsive disease, from those used in the past, even though rarely used nowadays (intravesical chemotherapy with single agents), to current available therapies (e.g. intravesical instillation with Gemcitabine-Docetaxel), and to future upcoming treatments (Oportuzumab Monatox).

EXPERT OPINION

At present, bladder-preserving treatments in BCG-unresponsive patients are represented by the use of intravesical instillations, systemic immunotherapies, both with good short-term and modest mid-term efficacy, and numerous clinical trials ongoing, with encouraging initial results, in which patients could be recruited.

Nogapendekin alfa Inbakicept: First Approval

Nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (ANKTIVA®; nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln) is a recombinant interleukin-15 (IL-15) superagonist protein complex being developed by Altor BioScience, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ImmunityBio, Inc., for the treatment of solid and haematological cancers and HIV infection. In April 2024, nogapendekin alfa inbakicept was approved for use with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for the treatment of adult patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumours in the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of nogapendekin alfa inbakicept leading to this first approval for the treatment of cancer.

An evaluation of nadofaragene firadenovec-vncg for the treatment of high-risk BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) represent a significant therapeutic challenge in the treatment of bladder cancer. Nadofaragene firadenovec, represents a breakthrough in this area, offering a novel approach for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

AREAS COVERED

This overview explores the historical development of nadofaragene firadenovec, assessing its efficacy and safety, and discusses future NMIBC therapy directions.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with high grade NMIBC who are BCG unresponsive will have a growing number of treatment alternatives to bladder removal. Nadofaragene firadenovec offers good short-term efficacy but lacks significant durability for most patients. Its strengths include ease of administration and low risk of adverse events. This will need to balance with risk of progression and cost. Furthermore, the likely approval of other agents will require consideration of which therapy to use and for which patient. The need for biomarkers to tailor treatment choices to individual patient needs is becoming more critical. The treatment field is rapidly advancing, with several Phase 3 single-arm trials underway, indicating a potential broader range of treatment options for NMIBC. Further research will be necessary to determine the optimal choice for patients.

Revolutionizing Treatment: Breakthrough Approaches for BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer is the 10th most popular cancer in the world, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is diagnosed in ~80% of all cases. Treatments for NMIBC include transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) and intravesical instillations of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors is scarce and usually leads to Radical Cystectomy. In this paper, we review recent advancements in conservative treatment of BCG-unresponsive tumors. The main focus of the paper is FDA-approved medications: Pembrolizumab and Nadofaragene Firadenovec (Adstiladrin). Other, less researched therapeutic possibilities are also included, namely: N-803 immunotherapy, TAR-200 and TAR-210 intravesical delivery systems and combined Cabazitaxel, Gemcitabine and Cisplatin chemotherapy. Conservative treatment and delaying radical cystectomy would greatly benefit patients' quality of life; it is undoubtedly the future of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

BCG and Alternative Therapies to BCG Therapy for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Treatment decisions are mostly decided based on disease stage (non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive). Patients with muscle-invasive disease will be offered a radical treatment combined with systemic therapy, while in those with non-muscle-invasive disease, an attempt to resect the tumor endoscopically will usually be followed by different intravesical instillations. The goal of intravesical therapy is to decrease the recurrence and/or progression of the tumor. In the current landscape of bladder cancer treatment, BCG is given intravesically to induce an inflammatory response and recruit immune cells to attack the malignant cells and induce immune memory. While the response to BCG treatment has changed the course of bladder cancer management and spared many "bladders", some patients may develop BCG-unresponsive disease, leaving radical surgery as the best choice of curative treatment. As a result, a lot of effort has been put into identifying novel therapies like systemic pembrolizumab and Nadofaragene-Firadenovac to continue sparing bladders if BCG is ineffective. Moreover, recent logistic issues with BCG production caused a worldwide BCG shortage, re-sparking interest in alternative BCG treatments including mitomycin C, sequential gemcitabine with docetaxel, and others. This review encompasses both the historic and current role of BCG in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, revisiting BCG alternative therapies and reviewing the novel therapeutics that were approved for the BCG-unresponsive stage or are under active investigation.

Urinary comprehensive genomic profiling predicts urothelial carcinoma recurrence and identifies responders to intravesical therapy

Intravesical therapy (IVT) is the standard of care to decrease risk of recurrence and progression for high-grade nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, post-IVT recurrence remains common and the ability to risk-stratify patients before or after IVT is limited. In this prospectively designed and accrued cohort study, we examine the utility of urinary comprehensive genomic profiling (uCGP) for predicting recurrence risk following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and evaluating longitudinal IVT response. Urine was collected before and after IVT instillation and uCGP testing was done using the UroAmp™ platform. Baseline uCGP following TURBT identified patients with high (61%) and low (39%) recurrence risk. At 24 months, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 100% for low-risk and 45% for high-risk patients with a hazard ratio (HR) of 9.3. Longitudinal uCGP classified patients as minimal residual disease (MRD) Negative, IVT Responder, or IVT Refractory with 24-month RFS of 100%, 50%, and 32%, respectively. Compared with MRD Negative patients, IVT Refractory patients had a HR of 10.5. Collectively, uCGP enables noninvasive risk assessment of patients following TURBT and induction IVT. uCGP could inform surveillance cystoscopy schedules and identify high-risk patients in need of additional therapy.

First-in-human phase I/Ib study of NIZ985, a recombinant heterodimer of IL-15 and IL-15Rα, as a single agent and in combination with spartalizumab in patients with advanced and metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Preclinically, interleukin-15 (IL-15) monotherapy promotes antitumor immune responses, which are enhanced when IL-15 is used in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This first-in-human study investigated NIZ985, a recombinant heterodimer comprising physiologically active IL-15 and IL-15 receptor α, as monotherapy and in combination with spartalizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

This phase I/Ib study had two dose-escalation arms: single-agent NIZ985 administered subcutaneously thrice weekly (TIW, 2 weeks on/2 weeks off) or once weekly (QW, 3 weeks on/1 week off), and NIZ985 TIW or QW administered subcutaneously plus spartalizumab (400 mg intravenously every 4 weeks (Q4W)). The dose-expansion phase investigated NIZ985 1 µg/kg TIW/spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W in patients with anti-PD-1-sensitive or anti-PD-1-resistant tumor types stratified according to approved indications. The primary objectives were the safety, tolerability, and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of NIZ985 for the dose-expansion phase.

RESULTS

As of February 17, 2020, 83 patients (median age: 63 years; range: 28-85) were treated in dose escalation (N=47; single-agent NIZ985: n=27; NIZ985/spartalizumab n=20) and dose expansion (N=36). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred nor was the MTD identified. The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was injection site reaction (primarily grades 1-2; single-agent NIZ985: 85% (23/27)); NIZ985/spartalizumab: 89% [50/56]). The most common grade 3-4 TRAE was decreased lymphocyte count (single-agent NIZ985: 7% [2/27]; NIZ985/spartalizumab: 5% [3/56]). The best overall response was stable disease in the single-agent arm (30% (8/27)) and partial response in the NIZ985/spartalizumab arm (5% [3/56]; melanoma, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer). In dose expansion, the disease control rate was 45% (5/11) in the anti-PD-1-sensitive and 20% (5/25) in the anti-PD-1-resistant tumor type cohorts. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar across arms. The transient increase in CD8+ T cell and natural killer cell proliferation and induction of several cytokines occurred in response to the single-agent and combination treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

NIZ985 was well tolerated in the single-agent and NIZ985/spartalizumab regimens. The RDE was established at 1 µg/kg TIW. Antitumor activity of the combination was observed against tumor types known to have a poor response to ICIs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02452268.

New Intravesical Agents for BCG-Unresponsive High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

With the exception of the FDA-approved valrubicin and pembrolizumab, there are no standard second-line treaments for BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

OBJECTIVES

To provide a systematic review of the novel intravesically administered therapeutic agents for the salvage treatment of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

METHODS

Online search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was performed. The endpoints of this review were to evaluate the efficacy of the agents in terms of complete response rates (CR) and durability of CR, overall survival, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival and to report on their toxicity profile. A search on Clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify ongoing clinical trials.

RESULTS

14 studies were included in this review. The critical clinical need for the development of an effective, safe and durable intravesical drug for the salvage treatment of high-risk NMIBC seems to be met mainly by intravesical gene therapy; in fact, data support the FDA-approved nadofaragene firadenovec as a potentially important therapeutic advancement in this context. Promising results are also being obtained by the combination of N-803/BCG and by innovative drug delivery systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the plethora of novel intravesical treatments that have completed phase II evaluation, one can reasonably expect that clinicians will soon have at their disposal new agents and treatment options for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. In the near future, it will be up to the urologist to identify, for each specific patient, the right agent to use, based on safety, results and cost-effectiveness.

Immunotherapy in urothelial cancer: current status and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Since 2016, the progressive use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) starting from second-line treatment has led to an improvement in overall survival in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). Clinical trials are underway testing the role of ICIs since the first stages of the disease, alone or in combination with standard therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the current updated evidence regarding the role of ICIs in the different stages of UC, the ongoing clinical trials exploring the potential benefit of immunotherapy alone or in combination with standard-of-care therapies, as well as the promising association of ICIs with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

EXPERT OPINION

In the first-line setting, ICIs alone in platinum-unfit patients have shown unconvincing results; the ongoing EV-302 trial will probably suggest enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as a new effective option. The optimal duration of maintenance immunotherapy is still to be determined, finding a balance with the risk-benefit profile. The clinical benefit of ICIs as second-line treatment is limited to a subset of patients that cannot be definitively established yet. In the next 5 years, a lot of new ADCs will likely emerge for the treatment of UC.

Exploiting an Interleukin-15 Heterodimeric Agonist (N803) for Effective Immunotherapy of Solid Malignancies

Identifying effective immunotherapies for solid tumors remains challenging despite the significant clinical responses observed in subsets of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a promising cytokine for the treatment of cancer as it stimulates NK and CD8⁺ lymphocytes. However, unfavorable pharmacokinetics and safety concerns render recombinant IL-15 (rIL-15) a less attractive modality. These shortcomings were addressed by the clinical development of heterodimeric IL-15 agonists, including N803. In preclinical tumor models, N803 elicited significant Th1 immune activation and tumor suppressive effects, primarily mediated by NK and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes. In addition, multiple clinical studies have demonstrated N803 to be safe for the treatment of cancer patients. The combination of N803 with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab demonstrated encouraging clinical responses in nivolumab-naïve and nivolumab-refractory patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In a recent Phase II/III clinical study, most Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-refractory bladder cancer patients treated with N803 plus BCG experienced durable complete responses. Currently, N803 is being evaluated preclinically and clinically in combination with various agents, including chemotherapeutics, immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and other immuno-oncology agents. This report will review the mechanism(s) of action of N803 and how it relates to the preclinical and clinical studies of N803.

Head and Neck Cancer Immunotherapy: Molecular Biological Aspects of Preclinical and Clinical Research

Breakthrough research in the field of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of a human papilloma virus vaccine triggered a plethora of research in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Both had significant effects on the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The advent of preclinical models and multidisciplinary approaches including bioinformatics, genetic engineering, clinical oncology, and immunology helped in the development of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Here, we discuss different immunotherapies such as adoptive T-cell transfer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, interleukins, and cancer vaccines for the treatment of head and neck cancer. This review showcases the intrinsic relation between the understanding and implementation of basic biology and clinical practice. We also address potential limitations of each immunotherapy approach and the advantages of personalized immunotherapy. Overall, the aim of this review is to encourage further research in the field of immunotherapy for head and neck cancer.