Longitudinal "Real-World" Outcomes of Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Greece

Real-world safety and effectiveness of pirfenidone and nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Multiple randomized controlled studies have shown that pirfenidone and nintedanib are effective and safe for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate their efficacy, safety, and tolerability in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for real-world studies published up to March 3, 2023, on pirfenidone and nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 74 studies with 23,119 participants were included. After 12 months of treatment, the change from baseline in percent predicted FVC (%FVC) was - 0.75% for pirfenidone and - 1.43% for nintedanib. The change from baseline in percent predicted DLCO (%DCLO) was - 2.32% for pirfenidone and - 3.95% for nintedanib. The incidence of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) was 12.5% for pirfenidone and 14.4% for nintedanib. The IPF-related mortality rates of pirfenidone and nintedanib were 13.4% and 7.2%, respectively. The all-cause mortality was 20.1% for pirfenidone and 16.6% for nintedanib. In the pirfenidone group, 16.6% of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, and in the nintedanib group, 16.2% of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The incidence of adverse events was 56.4% and 69.7% for pirfenidone and nintedanib, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that pirfenidone and nintedanib are both effective in slowing down the decline of lung function in IPF patients in real-world settings. The incidence of adverse events with pirfenidone is lower than that with nintedanib, but both are below the clinical trial data, and no new major adverse events have been observed. The discontinuation rates due to adverse reactions of the two drugs are consistent with clinical trial data, indicating good tolerability. However, the mortality rates and AE-IPF incidence rates of these two drugs in real-world settings are higher than those in previous clinical trials, with pirfenidone patients showing a higher mortality rate. Further large-sample studies are needed to investigate the risks of these drugs in these aspects. Additionally, we recommend that future real-world studies pay more attention to patients' subjective symptoms and conduct stratified analyses of the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone and nintedanib based on factors such as patients' baseline lung function, comorbidities, and age, in order to provide more personalized medication advice for IPF patients in clinical practice.

Cinnamic acid mitigates methotrexate-induced lung fibrosis in rats: comparative study with pirfenidone

PURPOSE

Lung fibrosis is a heterogeneous lung condition characterized by excessive accumulation of scarred tissue, leading to lung architecture destruction and restricted ventilation. The current work was conducted to examine the probable shielding influence of cinnamic acid against lung fibrosis induced by methotrexate.

METHODS

Rats were pre-treated with oral administration of cinnamic acid (50 mg/kg/day) for 14 days, whereas methotrexate (14 mg/kg) was orally given on the 5th and 12th days of the experiment. Pirfenidone (50 mg/kg/day) was used as a standard drug. At the end of the experiment, oxidative parameters (malondialdehyde, myeloperoxidase, nitric oxide, and total glutathione) and inflammatory mediators (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-8), as well as transforming growth factor-β and collagen content, as fibrosis indicators, were measured in lung tissue.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that cinnamic acid, as pirfenidone, effectively prevented the methotrexate-induced overt histopathological damage. This was associated with parallel improvements in oxidative, inflammatory, and fibrotic parameters measured. The outcomes of cinnamic acid administration were more or less the same as those of pirfenidone. In conclusion, pre-treatment with cinnamic acid protects against methotrexate-induced fibrosis, making it a promising prophylactic adjuvant therapy to methotrexate and protecting against its possible induction of lung fibrosis.

Real world experience on the effectiveness and safety of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Taiwan

Introduction

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a reduction in the decline of lung function and a reduced risk of acute exacerbation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with the antifibrotic prifenidone. The present study aimed to investigate the real-world effectiveness and safety profile of pirfenidone treatment for patients with IPF in Taiwan.

Methods

Between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020, we enrolled 50 patients who were newly diagnosed with IPF and had at least 12 months follow-up period after pirfenidone administration.

Result

The primary outcome of pharmacologic effect showed that the mean differences in the absolute values of forced vital capacity from baseline were 0.2 liter (n = 36), 0.13 liter (n = 32), 0.04 liter (n = 26), and - 0.004 liter (n = 26) after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of administration, respectively. A slight improvement in quality of life, including scores of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test and St. George's respiratory questionnaire scores. The most common adverse effects were gastrointestinal upset and dermatological problems. No new safety concerns were observed in the present study.

Conclusion

Our real-world study describe for the first time in Taiwan, the use of pirfenidone over a 12 months period. This drug preserves the lung function and improves quality of life with tolerable side effects.

Improvement of psoriatic skin lesions following pirfenidone use in patients with fibrotic lung disease

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the skin, characterised by uncontrolled proliferation and dysfunctional differentiation of keratinocytes. In our case series, pirfenidone was administered for the management of fibrotic lung disease and, serendipitously, we noticed remission of coexisting cutaneous psoriatic lesions few months after treatment initiation. Pirfenidone's antifibrotic and immunomodulatory properties have been well studied; yet, not fully elucidated. In line with this, pirfenidone may exert pleiotropic therapeutic effects in other immune-mediated diseases such as psoriasis, while, at the same time, spare immunosuppression-related side effects of current antipsoriatic drugs. Pirfenidone-mediated enhanced absorption of ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B by skin keratinocytes might represent a potential mechanism. The possible role of pirfenidone as an antipsoriatic drug requires large-scale and long-term study.

SH2 Domain-Containing Phosphatase-SHP2 Attenuates Fibrotic Responses through Negative Regulation of Mitochondrial Metabolism in Lung Fibroblasts

Background: We have previously shown that SHP2 downregulation may predispose fibroblasts to differentiate into myofibroblasts and proposed a role for SHP2 downregulation in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recent data have shown that SHP2 localizes to the mitochondrial intercristae, and its overexpression enhances mitochondrial metabolism leading to oxidative stress and senescence. Objective: To determine the effect of SHP2 on fibrotic responses. Methods and Results: Primary mouse lung fibroblasts derived from mice carrying a conditional knock-in mutation (D61G/+), rendering the SHP2 catalytic domain constitutively active, had reduced proliferation (1.6-fold, p < 0.05), migration (2-fold, p < 0.05), as well as reduced responsiveness of TGFB-1 induced fibroblasts-to-myofibroblasts differentiation, compared to wild-type ones. Electron microscope analysis revealed that SHP2 D61G/+ mouse lung fibroblasts were characterized by mitochondrial abnormalities, including swollen mitochondria with disrupted electron-lucent cristae and an increased number of autophagosomes compared to wild-type ones. SHP2 D61G/+ MLFs exhibited increased protein levels of autophagy markers, including LC3B-II and p-62, evidence that was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis. Mitochondrial function analysis revealed that stable (genotype D61G/+) overexpression of SHP2 led to impaired mitochondrial function, as assessed by decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (1.29-fold, p < 0.05), coupling efficiency (1.82 fold, p < 0.05), oxygen consumption rate (1.9-fold, p < 0.05), and increased reactive oxygen species production both at baseline (1.75-fold, p < 0.05) and following H2O2 stimulation (1.63-fold, p < 0.05) compared to wild-type ones (SHP2+/+). SHP2 D61G/+ mouse lung fibroblasts showed enhanced AMPK activity, as well as decreased activation of the mTORC1 signaling pathway, potentially leading to ineffective mitochondrial metabolism and increased autophagy. Conclusions: SHP2 attenuates fibrotic responses in fibroblast cell lines through negative regulation of mitochondrial metabolism and induction of autophagy. SHP2 activation may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with fibrotic lung diseases.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Survival and lung function decline in patients with definite, probable and possible idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with pirfenidone

Background

There is no clear evidence whether pirfenidone has a benefit in patients with probable or possible UIP, i.e. when idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is diagnosed with a lower degree of diagnostic certainty. We report on outcomes of treatment with pirfenidone in IPF patients diagnosed with various degrees of certainty.

Methods and findings

We followed patients in the multi-national European MultiPartner IPF Registry (EMPIRE) first seen between 2015 and 2018. Patients were assessed with HRCT, histopathology and received a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) IPF diagnosis. Endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and lung function decline.

Results

A total of 1626 patients were analysed, treated with either pirfenidone (N = 808) or receiving no antifibrotic treatment (N = 818). When patients treated with pirfenidone were compared to patients not receiving antifibrotic treatment, OS (one-, two- and three-year probability of survival 0.871 vs 0.798; 0.728 vs 0.632; 0.579 vs 0.556, P = 0.002), and PFS (one-, two- and three-year probability of survival 0.597 vs 0.536; 0.309 vs 0.281; 0.158 vs 0.148, P = 0.043) was higher, and FVC decline smaller (-0.073 l/yr vs -0.169 l/yr, P = 0.017). The benefit of pirfenidone on OS and PFS was also seen in patients with probable or possible IPF.

Conclusions

This EMPIRE analysis confirms the favourable outcomes observed for pirfenidone treatment in patients with definitive IPF and indicates benefits also for patients with probable or possible IPF.

Clinical relevance of circulating autoantibodies in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; A NAt hard to break

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis are screened for circulating autoantibodies as part of the initial interstitial lung disease workup. Management of seropositive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is currently considered no different than that of lone idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Emerging data however suggest that the former may possess distinct characteristics in terms of pathophysiology, histopathology, prognosis and amenability to immunomodulation. In that context, the aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of autoantibody status on: (i) the decline of forced vital capacity; (ii) the decline of diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide; and (iii) 3-year survival; in a cohort of 102 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. In a pilot sub-study, we also sought to evaluate whether changes in antibody status during disease course affect the aforementioned parameters by potentially reflecting activity of the autoimmunity component of the pro-fibrotic mechanism.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Current trends in candidate selection, contraindications, and indications for lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is an established treatment option that can improve quality of life and prolong survival for select patients diagnosed with end-stage lung disease. Given the gaps in organ donation and failures to make effective use of available organs, careful selection of candidates for lung transplant remains one of the most important considerations of the transplant community. Toward this end, we briefly reviewed recent trends in pretransplant evaluation, candidate selection, organ allocation, and organ preservation techniques. Since the latest consensus statement regarding appropriate selection of lung transplant candidates, many advances in the science and practice of lung transplantation have emerged and influenced our perspective of 'contraindications' to transplant. These advances have made it increasingly possible to pursue lung transplant in patients with risk factors for decreased survival-namely, older recipient age, increased body mass index, previous chest surgery, poorer nutritional status, and presence of chronic infection, cardiovascular disease, or extrapulmonary comorbid conditions. Therefore, we reviewed the updated evidence demonstrating the prognostic impact of these risk factors in lung transplant recipients. Lastly, we reviewed the salient evidence for current trends in disease-specific indications for lung transplantation, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, emphysema due to alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and pulmonary arterial hypertension, among other less common end-stage diseases. Overall, lung transplant remains an exciting field with considerable hope for patients as they experience remarkable improvements in quality of life and survival in the modern era.

Design of phase 2 study of TAS-115, a novel oral multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Background

TAS-115, a novel multi-kinase inhibitor, demonstrated antifibrotic effects in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

This is an open-label, intra-patient comparison, exploratory phase 2 study of TAS-115 to evaluate the efficacy and safety in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients when orally administered at 200 mg once daily on a 5-day on and 2-day off regimen for 13 weeks. This study consists of three cohorts: previously treated with pirfenidone (Cohort P, n = 20), with nintedanib (Cohort N, n = 20), and treatment naïve (Cohort U, n = 10). Male or female patients aged ≥40 to <80 years who were diagnosed with IPF in the preceding five years and having a percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) decline of ≥5% within the previous 6 months were enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint is change in the slope of %FVC decline at Week 13 from baseline. Key secondary endpoints are safety, change in FVC from baseline, proportion of the %FVC responders and change in percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung carbon monoxide from baseline, which are assessed at Weeks 6, 13 and 26.

Results

Enrollment of 45 patients was completed in July 2019. Results will be reported in 2021.

Discussion

This trial is intended to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of TAS-115 in IPF patients who have not responded to pirfenidone or nintedanib, as well as in those who are pirfenidone/nintedanib treatment naïve. The safety and tolerability in this population will be assessed.

Trial registration

JapicCTI-183898.

Pharmacological Interactions of Nintedanib and Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic

The discovery of antifibrotic agents have resulted in advances in the therapeutic management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Currently, nintedanib and pirfenidone have become the basis of IPF therapy based on the results of large randomized clinical trials showing their safety and efficacy in reducing disease advancement. However, the goal of completely halting disease progress has not been reached yet. Administering nintedanib with add-on pirfenidone is supposed to enhance the therapeutic benefit by simultaneously acting on two different pathogenic pathways. All this becomes more important in the context of the ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) because of the fibrotic consequences following SARS-CoV-2 infection in some patients. However, little information is available about their drug–drug interaction, which is important mainly in polymedicated patients. The aim of this review is to describe the current management of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs) in general and of IPF in particular, focusing on the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between these two drugs and their relationship with other medications in patients with IPF.

Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: real-life experience in the referral centre of Siena

Background:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and has a median survival after diagnosis of 2–5 years. Pirfenidone is the first approved antifibrotic drug for the treatment of IPF. Here we report the functional progress, side effects and survival data of a population of patients with IPF, diagnosed at our centre and treated with pirfenidone.

Methods:

We enrolled 91 patients with IPF (71 males) treated with pirfenidone. Clinical, survival and functional details were collected retrospectively at start of therapy and after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of treatment. Lung function tests at least 12 months before starting therapy were available for 40 patients and were entered in the database, as well as side effects.

Results:

During the observation period (922 ± 529 days), 27 patients died, 5 patients underwent lung transplant and 10 patients interrupted therapy due to adverse events or IPF progression. The median survival was 1606 days. There was a significant reduction in disease progression rate, as measured by trend of forced vital capacity, after 1 year of therapy with respect to before treatment (p = 0.0085). Forced vital capacity reduction rate was progressively higher in the subsequent years of treatment. Treatment-related side effects were reported in 25 patients and were predominantly mild. Overall, four patients discontinued therapy due to severe photosensitivity.

Conclusions:

Our findings confirm the efficacy of pirfenidone in reducing functional progression of IPF and its excellent safety profile in a real-life setting. This study, designed on a long-term follow up, contributes to the growing evidence on safety, tolerability and efficacy of pirfenidone in IPF.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

An updated safety review of the drug treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

The approval of antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone revolutionized the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These treatments showed acceptable tolerability in randomized-clinical trials; however, they have been associated with a spectrum of potential side effects which require careful assessment of risks and benefits in the individual patient before commencing and during antifibrotic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The accrued evidence on safety of nintedanib and pirfenidone is summarized, from the first randomized clinical trials to the open-label extension studies and post-marketing clinical experiences which helped clarify the long-term tolerability of these drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

The data collected over the last years confirmed the comparable tolerability profile of nintedanib and pirfenidone. The physician's assessment of expected side effects may help decide the optimal first-line therapy for the individual patient. Patient's counseling during treatment remains essential to manage emerging adverse events and eventually inform the decision of drug discontinuation.

Cell Therapy for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Rationale and Progress to Date

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating disease characterized by progressive lung scarring due to unknown injurious stimuli ultimately leading to respiratory failure. Diagnosis is complex and requires a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histological investigations, along with exclusion of known causes of lung fibrosis. The current understanding of the disease etiology suggests an interaction between genetic factors and epigenetic alterations in susceptible, older individuals. Prognosis is dismal and current treatment options include anti-fibrotic agents that only slow down disease progression and carry considerable side effects that hamper patients' quality of life. Therefore, the need for new, more effective treatments, alone or in combination with existing pharmacotherapy, is sorely needed. Regenerative medicine, the potential use of cell therapies to treat destructive diseases that cause architectural distortion to the target organ, has also emerged as an alternative therapeutic for lung diseases with unfavorable prognosis such as IPF. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and type II alveolar epithelial cells (AEC2s) have been used and their safety has been demonstrated. In the case of MSCs, both homogenic and allogeneic sources have been used and both are considered viable options without immunosuppressive therapy, taking into consideration the absence of immunogenicity and HLA response. AEC2s have been used in one trial with promising results but their use requires a deceased donor and immunosuppressive pre-treatment. In this review, we briefly summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of IPF, and the background and rationale for using MSCs or AEC2s as potential treatment options. We list and describe the clinical trials completed to date and provide a comparison of their methods and results as well as a possible way forward.

Effectiveness and safety of pirfenidone for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term effectiveness of pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treatment and to establish its adverse effects profile.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study in patients with IPF who initiated treatment with pirfenidone between 2011 and 2016. We collected demographic variables (age, sex); date of first and last treatment; reason for discontinuation; pulmonary function measures (forced vital capacity (FVC), carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO), and 6 min walk test (6MWT)) at treatment initiation (baseline) and at 1, 2 and 3 year follow-up; adherence to pirfenidone treatment; recorded adverse effects; and mortality.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients treated with pirfenidone were included; mean±SD age was 69±8 years, 74% were men, and 59% had a smoking history. Mean baseline values were: FVC 2.43±0.66 L (61.8±12.1%); DLCO 46.1±19.4%; and 6MWT 334±125 m. Median duration of treatment was 14±13 months, and treatment was discontinued in 58% of patients. The most frequently observed adverse effects were gastrointestinal disturbances and photosensitivity. Twenty (65%) patients were evaluated at 1 year, when mean FVC was 2.41±0.86 L (64.7±20.3%); DLCO 50.8±26.8%; and 6MWT 341±139 m. At 2 years' follow-up, 11 patients (36%) who were still taking pirfenidone were evaluated. Mean FVC was 2.34±0.79 L (66.2±14.7%); DLCO 50.0±28.3%; and 6MWT 265±121 m. At 3 years, five patients were still taking the treatment. Mean FVC was 2.71±0.84 L (71.0±24.7%); DLCO 52.6±26.7%; and 6MWT 286±139 m. Nineteen per cent of patients were non-adherent to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pirfenidone seems to be effective for long-term control of IPF despite substantial variability in response among individual patients. The most frequent adverse effects were digestive and cutaneous, prompting in some cases a reduction in dose or even discontinuation of the treatment.

Pirfenidone: A novel hypothetical treatment for COVID-19

Cytokine storm, multiorgan failure, and particularly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with COVID-19. A fulminant ARDS kills the majority of COVID-19 victims. Pirfenidone (5-methyl-1-phenyl-2-[1H]-pyridone), is a novel anti-fibrotic agent with trivial adverse effects. Pirfenidone is approved for the treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) for patients with mild to moderate disease. Pirfenidone could inhibit apoptosis, downregulate ACE receptors expression, decrease inflammation by several mechanisms and ameliorate oxidative stress and hence protect pneumocytes and other cells from COVID-19 invasion and cytokine storm simultaneously. Based on the pirfenidone mechanism of action and the known pathophysiology of COVID-19, I believe that pirfenidone has the potential for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.

Prognostic significance of forced vital capacity decline prior to and following antifibrotic therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Background:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD). Currently, two antifibrotic drugs are available for reducing forced vital capacity (FVC) decline in IPF. However, many pulmonologists wait before initiating treatment, especially when IPF patients have stable disease. This study aimed to investigate the impact on survival outcome of FVC decline and a slow rate of FVC decline prior to and following treatment with these two antifibrotic drugs.

Methods:

Out of the 235 IPF patients treated with antifibrotic therapy that were screened, 105 cases were eligible, who then underwent physiological evaluation at 6 months prior to and following antifibrotic therapy. Clinical characteristics and prognostic outcomes were compared among groups, and prognostic factors were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results:

In terms of %FVC decline prior to the therapy and a slow rate of FVC decline, there was no significant difference between stable and worsened groups and responder and non-responder groups, respectively. On the other hand, in terms of %FVC decline (decline >5%) following antifibrotic therapy, the stable/improved group had significantly better prognosis than the worsened group. Prognostic analysis revealed that a stable/improved status following antifibrotic therapy [HR: 0.35 (0.15–0.87)] was significantly associated with a better prognosis.

Conclusions:

Concerning the FVC decline prior to and following antifibrotic therapy and a slow rate of FVC decline, only the FVC decline following the therapy is associated with a greater survival outcome. An early treatment decision may thus be beneficial for IPF.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Treated With Pirfenidone or Nintedanib: A Real-Life Comparison Study

Background

Pirfenidone and nintedanib are the sole pharmacological therapies currently approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Limited comparison data is available in literature, despite they are both prescribed for mild-to-moderate disease. Here, we describe our almost 10 years real-life experience with antifibrotic treatment to investigate potential differences in terms of efficacy.

Population and Methods

We retrospectively recruited patients diagnosed with IPF and treated with pirfenidone or nintedanib at Siena Referral Center. Clinical, functional, safety and radiological data was collected at baseline and during the follow-up, according to our Center protocol.

Results

We retrospectively recruited 263 IPF patients (139 treated with pirfenidone and 124 with nintedanib) in the study. After 885.3 ± 559.5 days of observation, the median survival was 1224 days. No significant differences were found between pirfenidone and nintedanib in terms of survival and time to decline of forced vital capacity >10% (p = 0.8786 and p = 0.1677, respectively). A smaller lung diffusion for carbon monoxide (DL_CO) decrease was found after 1 year of therapy with nintedanib in respect to pirfenidone (p = 0.0167). Overall, 21 patients permanently discontinued antifibrotic treatment due to side effects (14 with pirfenidone, 7 with nintedanib); no fatal adverse events were recorded.

Discussion

Our results showed a similar effectiveness between pirfenidone and nintedanib in terms of mortality and functional disease progression. Both drugs confirmed their good tolerability profile and no new safety alerts were observed. Nintedanib was associated with a smaller reduction of DL_CO after 1 year of follow-up compared with pirfenidone, maybe due to its antiangiogenic properties.

A multicentre retrospective observational study on Polish experience of pirfenidone therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the PolExPIR study

BACKGROUND

Pirfenidone is an antifibrotic agent approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The drug is available for Polish patients with IPF since 2017. The PolExPIR study aimed to describe the real-world data (RWD) on the Polish experience of pirfenidone therapy in IPF with respect to safety and efficacy profiles.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, retrospective, observational study collecting clinical data of patients with IPF receiving pirfenidone from January 2017 to September 2019 across 10 specialized pulmonary centres in Poland. Data collection included baseline characteristics, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) results and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Longitudinal data on PFTs, 6MWT, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), treatment persistence, and survival were also collected up to 24 months post-inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients receiving pirfenidone were identified for analysis. The mean age was 68.83 (8.13) years and 77% were males. The median time from the first symptoms to IPF diagnosis was 15.5 (9.75-30) months and from diagnosis to start of pirfenidone treatment was 6 (2-23) months. Patients were followed on treatment for a median of 17 (12-22.75) months. Seventy-four patients (24.1%) required dose adjustments and 35 (11.4%) were chronically treated with different than the full recommended dose. A total of 141 patients (45.92%) discontinued therapy due to different reasons including ADRs (16.61%), death (8.79%), disease progression (6.51%), patient's own request (5.54%), neoplastic disease (3.91%) and lung transplantation (0.33%). Over up to 24 months of follow-up, the pulmonary function remained largely stable. The median annual decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) during the first year of pirfenidone therapy was -20 ml (-200-100) and during the second year was -120 ml (-340-30). Over a study period, 33 patients (10.75%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

The PolExPIR study is a source of longitudinal RWD on pirfenidone therapy in the Polish cohort of patients with IPF supporting its long-term acceptable safety and efficacy profiles and reinforce findings from the previous randomised clinical trials and observational studies.

Nutrition in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Critical Issues Analysis and Future Research Directions

In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), several factors may have a negative impact on the nutritional status, including an increased respiratory muscles load, release of inflammation mediators, the coexistence of hypoxemia, and physical inactivity. Nutritional abnormalities also have an impact on IPF clinical outcomes. Given the relevance of nutritional status in IPF patients, we sought to focus on some critical issues, highlighting what is known and what should be further learned about these issues. We revised scientific literature published between 1995 and August 2019 by searching on Medline/PubMed and EMBASE databases including observational and interventional studies. We conducted a narrative review on nutritional assessment in IPF, underlining the importance of nutritional evaluation not only in the diagnostic process, but also during follow-up. We also highlighted the need to keep a high level of attention on cardiovascular comorbidities. We also focused on current clinical treatment in IPF with Nintedanib and Pirfenidone and management of gastrointestinal adverse events, such as diarrhea, induced by these antifibrotic drugs. Finally, we concentrated on the importance of pulmonary rehabilitation program, including nutritional assessment, education and behavioral change, and psychological support among its essential components. More attention should be devoted to the assessment of the undernutrition and overnutrition, as well as of muscle strength and physical performance in IPF patients, taking also into account that an adequate clinical management of gastrointestinal complications makes IPF drug treatments more feasible.

Nutrition in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Critical Issues Analysis and Future Research Directions

In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), several factors may have a negative impact on the nutritional status, including an increased respiratory muscles load, release of inflammation mediators, the coexistence of hypoxemia, and physical inactivity. Nutritional abnormalities also have an impact on IPF clinical outcomes. Given the relevance of nutritional status in IPF patients, we sought to focus on some critical issues, highlighting what is known and what should be further learned about these issues. We revised scientific literature published between 1995 and August 2019 by searching on Medline/PubMed and EMBASE databases including observational and interventional studies. We conducted a narrative review on nutritional assessment in IPF, underlining the importance of nutritional evaluation not only in the diagnostic process, but also during follow-up. We also highlighted the need to keep a high level of attention on cardiovascular comorbidities. We also focused on current clinical treatment in IPF with Nintedanib and Pirfenidone and management of gastrointestinal adverse events, such as diarrhea, induced by these antifibrotic drugs. Finally, we concentrated on the importance of pulmonary rehabilitation program, including nutritional assessment, education and behavioral change, and psychological support among its essential components. More attention should be devoted to the assessment of the undernutrition and overnutrition, as well as of muscle strength and physical performance in IPF patients, taking also into account that an adequate clinical management of gastrointestinal complications makes IPF drug treatments more feasible.

Efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease-a randomised controlled trial

To assess the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, pilot study. Subjects with SSc-ILD and forced vital capacity (FVC) between 50 and 80% of the predicted (%pred) value were randomised in 1:1 ratio to receive either pirfenidone (2400 mg/day) or placebo for 6 months. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with either stabilisation or improvement in FVC at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the absolute change in the %pred FVC, Mahler's dyspnoea index, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS) and serum levels of tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β). Thirty-four subjects with median (range) age of 41 (20-63) years (91.2% women) and median (range) %pred FVC of 65 (51-78) were enrolled. Stabilisation/improvement in FVC was seen in 16 (94.1%) and 13 (76.5%) subjects in the pirfenidone and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.33). The median (range) absolute change in %pred FVC was - 0.55 (- 9 to 7%) and 1.0 (- 42 to 11.5%) in the treatment and control groups, respectively (p = 0.51). The changes in 6MWD, dyspnoea scores, MRSS, and levels of TNF-α and TGF-β were not significantly different between groups. Common adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbances and skin rash. We failed to find a significant beneficial effect of pirfenidone over placebo in improving/stabilising FVC, exercise capacity, symptoms, or skin disease. Study is underpowered to provide conclusive evidence. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are required.

Impact of Depression on Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Introduction: Depression is prevalent in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). The impact of depression on quality of life and its correlation with disease severity in patients with IPF has not been thoroughly evaluated on prospective studies. Patients and Methods: Between 2016 and 2017, we prospectively enrolled 101 patients (80 male, mean age (years) ± SD: 70.8 ± 8.1) with IPF (mean GAP score ± SD: 4.7 ± 1.8) without previous diagnosis of depression. Depressive symptoms were evaluated with Beck's depression inventory-II (BDI-II). Disease severity was evaluated with pulmonary function (FVC, DLCO) and exercise capacity measures. Symptom burden was assessed by cough and dyspnea scales. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) was assessed with two questionnaires. Results: Data for analysis was available from 98 patients (97%). Forty two patients (42.9%) presented with depressive symptoms scoring≥14. A significant association between depressive symptoms and measures of: 1) disease severity: a) GAP score: r = 0.32, p = 0.007, b) DLCO: r = -0.28, p = 0.007, c) 6MWD: r = -0.39, p = 0.017, 2) symptom burden: a) cough: r = -0.57, p < 0.001, b) dyspnea (Borg: r = 0.54, p < 0.001, mMRC: r = 0.55, p < 0.001, SOBQ: r = 0.57, p < 0.001 and 3) HRQL: a) SGRQ: (Total score: r = 0.68, p < 0.001, Activity Score: r = 0.60, p < 0.001, Impact score: r = 0.68, p < 0.001, Symptoms score: r = 0.60, p < 0.001, b) K-BILD: r = -0.66, p < 0.001), was identified. There was no statistically significant difference in BDI-II (p = 0.62) and SGRQ (p = 0.64) 1 year after treatment with antifibrotics. Conclusions: Patients with IPF and severe functional impairment tend to have increased risk for depression development and poor quality of life. Further prospective studies should investigate the role of antidepressant drug therapy in patients with IPF and comorbid depression.

Lung cancer in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. A retrospective multicenter study in Greece

BACKGROUND

Abundant evidence supports an association between Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and lung cancer development. Data on diagnosis and management of patients with IPF and lung cancer are still scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study, enrolling 1016 patients with IPF from eight different centers between 2011 and 2018 in Greece. Our aim was to estimate prevalence of lung cancer in patients with IPF in Greece.

RESULTS

We identified 102 cases of patients with IPF and lung cancer (prevalence = 10.03% n = 102/1016, mean age±SD = 71.8 ± 6.9, 96 males, mean FVC±SD = 72.7 ± 19.7, mean DLCO±SD = 44.5 ± 16.3). We identified 85 cases (83.3%) of non-small cell lung cancer (35 squamous, 28 adenocarcinoma), and 15 cases (14.7%) of small cell lung cancer. Primary lesion was localized in lower lobes in 57.1% of cases. Lung cancer was diagnosed post IPF diagnosis (mean latency time + SD = 33.2 + 36.1 months) in 57.6% of patients and synchronously in 36.5% of patients. Chemotherapy was applied in 26.7% of cases, while 34.7% of patients underwent surgery. Median survival of patients with IPF and lung cancer was 27.4 months (95% CI: 20.6 to 36.8).

CONCLUSIONS

IPF is a risk factor for lung cancer development. In line with current literature, squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histologic subtype in patients with IPF. Large randomized controlled studies on the management of patients with IPF and lung cancer are sorely needed.

Real-life comparison of pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A 24-month assessment

BACKGROUND

Real-life data on the use of pirfenidone and nintedanib to treat patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are still scarce.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy of either pirfenidone (n = 78) or nintedanib (n = 28) delivered over a 24-month period in patients with IPF, followed at two regional clinic centers in Italy, with a group of patients who refused the treatment (n = 36), and who were considered to be controls. All patients completed regular visits at 1- to 3-month intervals, where primary [forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)] and secondary outcomes (side effects, treatment compliance, and mortality) were recorded.

RESULTS

Over time, the decline in FVC and DLCO was significantly higher (p = 0.0053 and p = 0.037, respectively) in controls when compared with the combined treated group, with no significant difference between the two treated groups. Compared to patients with less advanced disease (GAP (Gender, Age, Physiology) stage I), those in GAP stages II and III showed a significantly higher decline in both FVC and DLCO irrespective of the drug taken. Side effects were similarly reported in patients receiving pirfenidone and nintedanib (5% and 7%, respectively), whereas mortality did not differ among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

This real-life study demonstrated that both pirfenidone and nintedanib were equally effective in reducing the decline of FVC and DLCO versus non-treated patients after 24 months of treatment; however, patients with more advanced disease were likely to show a more rapid decline in respiratory function.

Pirfenidone in real life: A retrospective observational multicentre study in Italian patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

RATIONALE

Real-world data on pirfenidone treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are limited. This study assessed the effectiveness of pirfenidone in a large real-life Italian IPF cohort.

METHODS

IRENE was an observational, retrospective study of patients with IPF treated with pirfenidone in routine clinical practice (18 centres). At Month 6, a mandatory re-evaluation of forced vital capacity (FVC) decline (absolute change < 10%) was required to continue pirfenidone. The primary effectiveness outcomes were absolute change from baseline in FVC and the percentage of patients with ≥ 10% absolute decline in % predicted FVC at Month 12. Safety was described by adverse event (AE) occurrence. Prespecified subgroups included sex, age, presence/absence of emphysema, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on high-resolution computed tomography, and baseline lung function.

RESULTS

The study included 379 patients (mean age, 67.6 years; 78.1% male). Mean change from baseline in FVC and the percentage of patients with ≥ 10% absolute decline in % predicted FVC at Month 12 were -81.8 mL (SD, 419.6 mL; P = 0.002) and 16.0% (95% CI, 12.2-20.9%), respectively. Disease progression was similar across prespecified subgroups, including patients with definite vs possible UIP. Overall, 211 AEs occurred in 149 patients (39.3%), with serious AEs in 31 patients (8.2%) and 9 discontinuations due to AEs. Skin and gastrointestinal AEs were most frequent. Fifteen patients (4.0%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

The decline in FVC and the safety profile observed in this real-world IPF cohort were consistent with the findings of the Phase III pirfenidone trials.

Management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Objective: Provide information for pharmacists on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and its treatment. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All articles with data from randomized controlled trials of nintedanib or pirfenidone were reviewed. Data Synthesis: IPF is a progressive and ultimately fatal interstitial lung disease characterized by decline in lung function and worsening dyspnea. It is uncommon and mainly occurs in individuals aged >60 years, particularly men with a history of smoking. Nintedanib and pirfenidone were approved in the United States for the treatment of IPF in 2014 and received conditional recommendations in the 2015 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association treatment guidelines. These drugs slow the progression of IPF by reducing the rate of decline in lung function. Their adverse event profile is characterized mainly by gastrointestinal events, which can be managed through dose adjustment and symptom management. Management of IPF should also include smoking cessation, vaccinations, and supportive care such as patient education, pulmonary rehabilitation, and the use of supplemental oxygen as well as optimizing the management of comorbidities. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review provides clinical pharmacists with information on the course of IPF, what can be expected of current treatments, and how to help patients manage their drug therapy. Conclusions: IPF is a progressive disease, but treatments are available that can slow the progression of the disease. Clinical pharmacists can play an important role in the care of patients with IPF through patient education, monitoring medication compliance and safety, ensuring drugs for comorbidities are optimized, and preventive strategies such as immunizations.

The Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

In this study we aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety profile of pirfenidone for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate IPF and receiving pirfenidone treatment across three centers in Turkey between January and September 2017 were retrospectively collected. Pulmonary function measurements, including percentage of forced vital capacity (FVC%) and percentage of diffusion capacity (DLCO%) were analyzed in patients who received pirfenidone treatment for at least 6 months. Decline in lung function, defined as an absolute decline of at least 10% in FVC from baseline, or death at 6 months was also analyzed. Safety data were included for all follow-up visits.

RESULTS

In the pooled cohort (n = 60), patients were mostly men (73.4%) and current or former smokers (61.7%). Average baseline FVC% and DLCO% were 68.4% and 48.7%, respectively. Forty-seven patients (78.3%) had a high-resolution computed tomography scan with a definite interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, and 18 patients (30%) had a surgically proven UIP pattern. Forty-six (76.7%) patients with IPF remained stable and 14 (23.3%) patients had progressed according to decline in FVC of at least 10% during the therapy course. After 6 months of therapy, cough decreased in 58.3% of patients. At least one side effect due to therapy was encountered in 33 (55.0%) IPF patients. Dyspepsia (36.4%), nausea (27.3%), and rash/photosensitivity (24.2%) were the most frequent side effects in our cohort. Sixteen patients (26.7%) needed dose adjustment, one patient (1.7%) discontinued therapy, and one patient (1.7%) died in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that pirfenidone seems to be an effective treatment for IPF and also had tolerable and relatively acceptable side effects.

FUNDING

Roche.

Biologic Treatments in Interstitial Lung Diseases

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) represent a group of heterogeneous parenchymal lung disorders with complex pathophysiology, characterized by different clinical and radiological patterns, ultimately leading to pulmonary fibrosis. A considerable proportion of these disease entities present with no effective treatment, as current therapeutic regimens only slow down disease progression, thus leaving patients, at best case, with considerable functional disability. Biologic therapies have emerged and are being investigated in patients with different forms of ILD. Unfortunately, their safety profile has raised many concerns, as evidence shows that they might cause or exacerbate ILD status in a subgroup of patients. This review article aims to summarize the current state of knowledge on their role in patients with ILD and highlight future perspectives.

Effect of pirfenidone on lung function decline and survival: 5-yr experience from a real-life IPF cohort from the Czech EMPIRE registry

Introduction

Pirfenidone, an antifibrotic drug, slows-down the disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) over 12 months, however limited data on the decline of lung function and overall survival (OS) in real-world cohorts on longer follow-up exists.

Patients/methods

Of the enrolled Czech IPF patients (n = 841) from an EMPIRE registry, 383 (45.5%) received pirfenidone, 218 (25.9%) no-antifibrotic treatment and 240 (28.5%) were excluded (missing data, nintedanib treatment). The 2- and 5-yrs OS and forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DL_CO) were investigated at treatment initiation and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months’ follow-up.

Results

During a 2-yr follow-up, less than a quarter of the patients progressed on pirfenidone as assessed by the decline of ≥10% FVC (17.0%) and ≥ 15% DL_CO (14.3%). On pirfenidone, the DL_CO (≥10%) declines at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months’ and DL_CO (≥15%) declines at 6, 18 and 24 months’ follow-up were associated with increased mortality. The DL_CO decline showed higher predictive value for mortality than FVC decline. In patients with no-antifibrotics, FVC and DL_CO declines were not predictive for mortality. Pirfenidone increased 5-yrs OS over no-antifibrotic treatment (55.9% vs 31.5% alive, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Our study observed the 2-yrs sustained effect of pirfenidone on the decline of lung function and survival in the real-world patient’s IPF cohort. DL_CO decline of ≥10% shows a potential as a mortality predictor in IPF patients on pirfenidone, and should be routinely evaluated during follow-up examinations.

Pirfenidone improves survival in IPF: results from a real-life study

BACKGROUND

Pirfenidone is an antifibrotic compound approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We present our real-world experience in terms of Pirfenidone's effect on mortality and adverse events profile outside the restrictions of a clinical trial.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational intention to treat study of 82 consecutive IPF patients (UHH cohort).

RESULTS

We observed a high 3-years survival rate of 73% without excluding patients who discontinued treatment for different reasons. The survival was compared to the survival of an IPF cohort from a tertiary referral center (RBH cohort). After exclusion of severe cases (DLco< 30%), in unadjusted analysis, the survival in the UHH cohort was better than in the RBH cohort (HR:0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.53, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for age, gender and FVC, the survival remained higher in the UHH cohort (HR:0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.48, p < 0.0001). We observed a similar safety profile compared to previously published data and a lower rate of drug discontinuation due to photosensitivity reactions.

CONCLUSION

Pirfenidone provides a survival benefit in a real-life IPF cohort compared to previously used medications. Counselling patients and proactively managing possible adverse effects can reduce the necessity to discontinue pirfenidone.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF): An Overview

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an interstitial lung disease characterised by chronic, progressive scarring of the lungs and the pathological hallmark of usual interstitial pneumonia. Current paradigms suggest alveolar epithelial cell damage is a key initiating factor. Globally, incidence of the disease is rising, with associated high morbidity, mortality, and economic healthcare burden. Diagnosis relies on a multidisciplinary team approach with exclusion of other causes of interstitial lung disease. Over recent years, two novel antifibrotic therapies, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have been developed, providing treatment options for many patients with IPF, with several other agents in early clinical trials. Current efforts are directed at identifying key biomarkers that may direct more customized patient-centred healthcare to improve outcomes for these patients in the future.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an inexorably progressive lung disease of unknown origin. Prognosis is poor, with limited treatment options available, and the median survival remains just 3-5 years. Despite the use of pirfenidone and nintedanib for the treatment of IPF, curative therapies remain elusive and mortality remains high. Regenerative medicine and the use of cell-based therapies has recently emerged as a potential option for various diseases. Promising results of preclinical studies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) suggest that they may represent a potential therapeutic option for the treatment of chronic lung diseases including IPF. Encouraging results of Phase 1 studies of MSCs various have reduced safety concerns. Nonetheless, there is still a pressing need for exploratory biomarkers and interval end-points in the context of MSCs investigation. This review intends to summarize the current state of knowledge for stem cells in the experimental and clinical setting of IPF, present important safety and efficacy issues, highlight future challenges and address the need for large, multicenter clinical trials coupled with realistic end-points, including biomarkers, to assess treatment efficacy.

Pulmonary hypertension in patients with interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a broad and heterogeneous group of more than two hundred diseases with common functional characteristics. Their diagnosis and management require a multidisciplinary approach. This multidisciplinary approach involves the assessment of comorbid conditions including pulmonary hypertension (PH) that exerts a dramatic impact on survival. The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of PH encompasses many of the interstitial lung diseases into WHO Group 3, while sarcoidosis, Pulmonary Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis are placed into WHO Group 5 as diseases with unclear or multifactorial mechanisms. Connective tissue diseases could span any of the 5 WHO groups based on the primary phenotype into which they manifest. Interestingly, several challenging phenotypes present with features that overlap between two or more WHO PH groups. Currently, PH-specific treatment is recommended only for patients classified into WHO Group 1 PH. The lack of specific treatment for other groups, including PH in the setting of ILD, reflects the poor outcomes of these patients. Thus, identification of the optimal strategy for ILD patients with PH remains an amenable need. This review article provides a brief overview of biomarkers indicative of vascular remodeling in interstitial lung disease, summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding patients with PH and ILD and highlights future perspectives that remain to be addressed.

Safety and efficacy of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A real-life observational study in Greece

BACKGROUND

Nintedanib represents an antifibrotic compound able to slow down disease progression of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of nintedanib in patients with IPF in a real-life setting.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, retrospective, observational, real-life study for patients with IPF receiving nintedanib between October 2014 and October 2016.

RESULTS

We identified 94 patients with IPF receiving nintedanib (72 males, mean age±SD: 73.8 ± 7.5, mean%FVC±SD = 68.1 ± 18.3, mean%DLCo±SD = 44.4 ± 14.5). Diarrhea (n = 52, 55.3%) was the most commonly reported adverse event. Twenty patients (21.2%) had to permanently discontinue nintedanib due to severe adverse events. In the 6-months follow-up, median decline in %FVC predicted and %DLCO predicted were 1.36 (95%Cl: 0 to 2.97) and 4.00 (95%Cl: 2.01 to 6.20), respectively, when deaths were censored and excluded from the analysis. At 12 months, mean%FVC±SD and mean%DLCo±SD were 64.5 ± 19.1 and 43.7 ± 15.4, respectively. With regards to mortality, 17 patients (18.1%) died over a study period of 730 days.

CONCLUSION

Nintedanib demonstrated an acceptable safety and efficacy profile in our real-world observational study. Prospective observational studies in the context of registries that collect well-defined supporting data over time are sorely needed to answer residual questions on drug's performance.