Refractory Celiac Disease Type II: A Case Report and Literature Review

Prevalence of Coagulopathy in Patients with Celiac Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study

Introduction: Despite being one of the most frequent chronic digestive diseases worldwide, with a prevalence of 1%, celiac disease (CD) remains severely underdiagnosed. Among the instruments used to improve its diagnostic rate, hematologic parameters have been proposed as screening tests to select patients with an increased probability of having CD. Assessment of coagulation is included in routine check-ups, and CD has been reported to be associated with coagulopathy. We aimed to assess if subtle changes in coagulation tests could be used in clinical practice to prompt testing for CD. Methods: We retrospectively recruited all patients with clinical suspicion for CD during a study period of 7 years (between 2015 and 2022), who were tested using IgA tissue transglutaminase (tTG) serology and serum total IgA (IgG tTG in case of IgA deficiency) and who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with multiple biopsy sampling of the duodenal bulb and distal duodenum. We stratified patients into three groups: newly diagnosed CD, gluten-free diet-treated CD, and non-CD controls. Results: Altogether, there were 133 CD patients (71 newly diagnosed, 62 GFD-treated) and 57 non-CD controls. Mean age and gender distribution were similar among the three groups: 43.3 years for newly diagnosed CD, 41.6 years for non-CD controls, and 44 years for GFD-treated CD patients, with a male gender distribution of 21.1%, 28%, and 24.1%, respectively. Among the included newly diagnosed CD patients, 14% had a prolonged INR. The mean INR was slightly higher in newly diagnosed CD patients, compared to GFD-treated CD patients and non-CD controls: 1.12 ± 0.30, 1.02 ± 0.83, and 1.00 ± 0.08, respectively (p = 0.009). Consequently, prothrombin activity was slightly lower in newly diagnosed CD patients, compared to GFD-treated CD and non-CD controls: 94.9 ± 19.3%, 102.3 ± 12.8%, and 101.9 ± 15.15, respectively. Interestingly, after GFD, the mean INR and prothrombin activity of CD individuals reached a value similar to that of non-CD controls. Conclusions: Subtle changes in INR, defined as a value within the normal range, but closer to the upper limit, could be an indicator of probability for CD.

Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Celiac Disease Using an Autoimmune Discovery Transcriptomic Panel Highlighted Pathogenic Genes including BTLA

Celiac disease is a common immune-related inflammatory disease of the small intestine caused by gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. This research is a proof-of-concept exercise focused on using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and an autoimmune discovery gene panel to predict and model celiac disease. Conventional bioinformatics, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and several machine learning and neural network techniques were used on a publicly available dataset (GSE164883). Machine learning and deep learning included C5, logistic regression, Bayesian network, discriminant analysis, KNN algorithm, LSVM, random trees, SVM, Tree-AS, XGBoost linear, XGBoost tree, CHAID, Quest, C&R tree, random forest, and neural network (multilayer perceptron). As a result, the gene panel predicted celiac disease with high accuracy (95–100%). Several pathogenic genes were identified, some of the immune checkpoint and immuno-oncology pathways. They included CASP3, CD86, CTLA4, FASLG, GZMB, IFNG, IL15RA, ITGAX, LAG3, MMP3, MUC1, MYD88, PRDM1, RGS1, etc. Among them, B and T lymphocyte associated (BTLA, CD272) was highlighted and validated at the protein level by immunohistochemistry in an independent series of cases. Celiac disease was characterized by high BTLA, expressed by inflammatory cells of the lamina propria. In conclusion, artificial intelligence predicted celiac disease using an autoimmune discovery gene panel.

Association between intestinal neoplasms and celiac disease: A review

Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic immune-mediated intestinal disease with genetic susceptibility. It is characterized by inflammatory damage to the small intestine after ingestion of cereals and products containing gluten protein. In recent years, the global prevalence rate of CD has been approximately 1%, and is gradually increasing. CD patients adhere to a gluten-free diet (GFD) throughout their entire life. However, it is difficult to adhere strictly to a GFD. Untreated CD may be accompanied by gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and extraintestinal symptoms caused by secondary malnutrition. Many studies have suggested that CD is associated with intestinal tumors such as enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL), small bowel cancer (SBC), and colorectal cancer. In this study, we reviewed related studies published in the literature to provide a reference for the prevention and treatment of intestinal tumors in patients with CD. Compared with the general population, CD patients had a high total risk of SBC and EATL, but not colorectal cancer. The protective effect of GFD on CD-related malignancies is controversial. Further studies are needed to confirm whether GFD treatment can reduce the risk of intestinal neoplasms in CD.

Small and Large Intestine (I): Malabsorption of Nutrients

Numerous disorders can alter the physiological mechanisms that guarantee proper digestion and absorption of nutrients (macro- and micronutrients), leading to a wide variety of symptoms and nutritional consequences. Malabsorption can be caused by many diseases of the small intestine, as well as by diseases of the pancreas, liver, biliary tract, and stomach. This article provides an overview of pathophysiologic mechanisms that lead to symptoms or complications of maldigestion (defined as the defective intraluminal hydrolysis of nutrients) or malabsorption (defined as defective mucosal absorption), as well as its clinical consequences, including both gastrointestinal symptoms and extraintestinal manifestations and/or laboratory abnormalities. The normal uptake of nutrients, vitamins, and minerals by the gastrointestinal tract (GI) requires several steps, each of which can be compromised in disease. This article will first describe the mechanisms that lead to poor assimilation of nutrients, and secondly discuss the symptoms and nutritional consequences of each specific disorder. The clinician must be aware that many malabsorptive disorders are manifested by subtle disorders, even without gastrointestinal symptoms (for example, anemia, osteoporosis, or infertility in celiac disease), so the index of suspicion must be high to recognize the underlying diseases in time.