Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial

Comprehensive insights on treatment modalities with conventional and herbal drugs for the treatment of duodenal ulcers

Areas of the body accessible to gastric secretions, such as the stomach and duodenum, are most commonly damaged by circumscribed lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract mucosa. Peptic ulcer disease is the term for this illness (PUD). About 80% of peptic ulcers are duodenal ulcers, with stomach ulcers accounting for the remaining 20%. Duodenal ulcers are linked to the two primary results about Helicobacter pylori infection and COX inhibitor users. Additional causes might include drinking, smoking, stress, and coffee consumption. The indications and symptoms of a duodenal ulcer depend on the patient's age and the lesion's location. For duodenal ulcers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the usual course of treatment. This comprehensive study included an in-depth literature search in the literature and methods section using electronic databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The search method included publications published from the inception of the relevant database to the present. Inclusion criteria included studies investigating different treatment options for duodenal ulcer disease, including traditional pharmacotherapy and naturopathic treatments. Data mining includes information on treatment techniques, treatment outcomes, and possible synergies between conventional and herbal treatments. In addition, this review critically examines the available information on the effectiveness, safety, and possible side effects of different treatments. The inclusion of conventional and herbal treatments is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the many treatment options available for duodenal ulcer disease. A more comprehensive and personalized treatment plan can be achieved by incorporating dietary changes, lifestyle modifications, and, if necessary, herbal therapies to complement other treatments normally.

PDE5 inhibitors and gastric mucosa: implications for the management of peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) continues to be a cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Almost two-thirds of PUD cases are asymptomatic. In symptomatic patients, epigastric pain is the most common presenting symptom of PUD, which is manifested by nausea, abdominal fullness, bloating, and dyspepsia. Most PUD cases are associated with the use of COX inhibitors or Helicobacter pylori infection, or both. The traditional management of PUD includes the use of proton pump inhibitors to reduce the gastric acid secretion and antibacterial drugs to combat H. pylori. Timely diagnosis and treatment of PUD are vital to reduce the risk of associated morbidity and mortality, as is prevention of PUD among patients at high risk, including COX inhibitors users and those infected with H. pylori. PDE5 inhibitors have been used for the management of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension for decades. In recent years, studies have mentioned tremendous pleiotropic effects of PDE5 inhibitors on gastrointestinal, urogenital, musculoskeletal, reproductive, cutaneous, and neurologic disorders. Recent data shows that PDE5 inhibition augments gastric mucosa protection, and here, we review the most recent findings regarding the use of PDE5 inhibitors for the prevention and management of PUD.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Anaprazole, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin after Single-Dose Simultaneous Administration and the Effect of Adding Bismuth on Their Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Male Chinese Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori-positive ulcers are treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) + two antibiotics with/without bismuth. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction of the novel PPI anaprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin with/without bismuth.

METHODS

This single-centre, randomised, open-label phase 1 pharmacokinetic study included healthy Chinese male participants, comprising two cohorts (cohort 1, 4 × 4 crossover design; cohort 2, 2 × 2 crossover design). In cohort 1, 24 participants received four treatment cycles with a different treatment in each cycle; the washout period between cycles was 9 days. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the following four treatment sequences (1:1:1:1): anaprazole sodium enteric-coated tablet 20 mg monotherapy, amoxicillin 1000 mg monotherapy, clarithromycin 500 mg monotherapy, and a three-drug combination (anaprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg). During each treatment cycle, study drugs were administered twice daily for four consecutive days and once in the morning on the fifth day. Cohort 2 participants were administered a single dose of the three-drug combination and a single dose of a four-drug combination (three-drug combination + bismuth 0.6 g) with a washout period of 11 ± 2 days between treatments. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 32 enrolled participants (cohort 1, n = 24; cohort 2, n = 8) completed the study. There were no significant differences in exposure or time to reach maximum concentration (T_max) between each single drug or the three-drug combination (cohort 1) or between the three- and four-drug combinations (cohort 1) for any of the drugs/metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose adjustments for individual drugs are not necessary with combined dosing of anaprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and bismuth.

Effect and safety of anaprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a randomized, rabeprazole-controlled, phase III non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetic and clinical behaviors of many proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in peptic ulcer treatment are altered by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms. This non-inferiority study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the novel PPI anaprazole compared with rabeprazole. We also explored the influence of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection status and CYP2C19 polymorphism on anaprazole.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-drug parallel-controlled, phase III study, Chinese patients with duodenal ulcers were randomized 1:1 to receive rabeprazole 10 mg + anaprazole placebo or rabeprazole placebo + anaprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 4-week ulcer healing rate assessed by blinded independent review. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with improved overall and individual duodenal ulcer symptoms at 4 weeks. Furthermore, exploratory subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint by H. pylori status and CYP2C19 polymorphism was conducted. Adverse events were monitored for safety. Non-inferiority analysis was conducted for the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 448 patients (anaprazole, n = 225; rabeprazole, n = 223). The 4-week healing rates were 90.9% and 93.7% for anaprazole and rabeprazole, respectively (difference, -2.8% [95% confidence interval, -7.7%, 2.2%]), demonstrating non-inferiority of anaprazole to rabeprazole. Overall duodenal ulcer symptoms improved in 90.9% and 92.5% of patients, respectively. Improvement rates of individual symptoms were similar between the groups. Healing rates did not significantly differ by H. pylori status or CYP2C19 genotype for either treatment group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for anaprazole (72/220, 32.7%) and rabeprazole (84/219, 38.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of anaprazole is non-inferior to that of rabeprazole in Chinese patients with duodenal ulcers.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04215653.

Gastroduodenal injury and repair: novel targets for therapeutic intervention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the mucosal barrier serves as a primary interface between the environment and host, little is understood about the repair of acute, superficial lesions or deeper, persistent lesions that if not healed, can be the site of increased permeability to luminal antigens, inflammation and/or neoplasia development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have focused on focal adhesion kinase, which regulates controlled matrix adhesion during restitution after superficial injury. Actin polymerization regulates cell migration and the importance of actin-related proteins was also highlighted. Work on SARS-CoV-2 infection lent important new insights on gastroduodenal mucosal injury in patients with Covid-19 infection and work done with organoids and intestine-on-a-chip contributed new understanding about how coronaviruses infect gastrointestinal tissues and its resulting barrier dysfunction. A novel risk stratification paradigm was proposed to assist with decision making about repeat endoscopy for patients with gastric or duodenal ulcers and new therapeutic options were studied for ulcer disease. Lastly, work to support the mechanism of metaplasia development after deep injury and parietal cell loss was provided using novel transgenic mouse models.

SUMMARY

Recent studies highlight novel molecular targets to promote mucosal healing after injury of the gastroduodenal mucosa.