Crosstalk Regulation Between Bacterial Chromosome Replication and Chromosome Partitioning

Macromolecular Crowding, Phase Separation, and Homeostasis in the Orchestration of Bacterial Cellular Functions

Macromolecular crowding affects the activity of proteins and functional macromolecular complexes in all cells, including bacteria. Crowding, together with physicochemical parameters such as pH, ionic strength, and the energy status, influences the structure of the cytoplasm and thereby indirectly macromolecular function. Notably, crowding also promotes the formation of biomolecular condensates by phase separation, initially identified in eukaryotic cells but more recently discovered to play key functions in bacteria. Bacterial cells require a variety of mechanisms to maintain physicochemical homeostasis, in particular in environments with fluctuating conditions, and the formation of biomolecular condensates is emerging as one such mechanism. In this work, we connect physicochemical homeostasis and macromolecular crowding with the formation and function of biomolecular condensates in the bacterial cell and compare the supramolecular structures found in bacteria with those of eukaryotic cells. We focus on the effects of crowding and phase separation on the control of bacterial chromosome replication, segregation, and cell division, and we discuss the contribution of biomolecular condensates to bacterial cell fitness and adaptation to environmental stress.

TipN's involvement with centromere segregation in Caulobacter crescentus

Bacteria's ability to maintain chromosomal integrity throughout their life cycle is crucial for their survival. In Caulobacter crescentus, the polar factor TipN has been proposed to be involved with the partitioning system ParABS. However, cells with tipN knocked out display subtle parS segregation defects. We hypothesized that TipN's role with parS segregation is obscured by other forces that are ParABS-independent. To test our hypothesis, we removed one of those forces - chromosome replication - and analyzed the role of TipN with ParA. We first demonstrate that ParA retains its ability to transport the centromeric region parS from the stalked pole to the opposite pole in the absence of chromosome replication. Our data revealed that in the absence of chromosome replication, TipN becomes essential for ParA's ability to transport parS. Furthermore, we identify a potential connection between the replication initiator DnaA and TipN. Although TipN is not essential for viability, tipN knockout cells lose viability when the regulation of DnaA levels is altered. Our data suggest that the DnaA-dependent susceptibility of tipN knockout cells is connected to parS segregation. Collectively, this work provides insights into the complex regulation involved in the coordination of chromosome replication and segregation in bacteria.

The interplay between the polar growth determinant DivIVA, the segregation protein ParA, and their novel interaction partner PapM controls the Mycobacterium smegmatis cell cycle by modulation of DivIVA subcellular distribution

IMPORTANCE

The genus of Mycobacterium includes important clinical pathogens (M. tuberculosis). Bacteria of this genus share the unusual features of their cell cycle such as asymmetric polar cell elongation and long generation time. Markedly, control of the mycobacterial cell cycle still remains not fully understood. The main cell growth determinant in mycobacteria is the essential protein DivIVA, which is also involved in cell division. DivIVA activity is controlled by phosphorylation, but the mechanism and significance of this process are unknown. Here, we show how the previously established protein interaction partner of DivIVA in mycobacteria, the segregation protein ParA, affects the DivIVA subcellular distribution. We also demonstrate the role of a newly identified M. smegmatis DivIVA and ParA interaction partner, a protein named PapM, and we establish how their interactions are modulated by phosphorylation. Demonstrating that the tripartite interplay affects the mycobacterial cell cycle contributes to the general understanding of mycobacterial growth regulation.

Robust ParB Binding to Half-parS Sites in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-A Mechanism for Retaining ParB on the Nucleoid?

Chromosome segregation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is assisted by the tripartite ParAB-parS system, composed of an ATPase (ParA), a DNA-binding protein (ParB) and its target parS sequence(s). ParB forms a nucleoprotein complex around four parSs (parS1-parS4) that overlaps oriC and facilitates relocation of newly synthesized ori domains inside the cells by ParA. Remarkably, ParB of P. aeruginosa also binds to numerous heptanucleotides (half-parSs) scattered in the genome. Here, using chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq), we analyzed patterns of ParB genome occupancy in cells growing under conditions of coupling or uncoupling between replication and cell division processes. Interestingly, a dissipation of ParB-parS complexes and a shift of ParB to half-parSs were observed during the transition from the exponential to stationary phase of growth on rich medium, suggesting the role of half-parSs in retaining ParB on the nucleoid within non-dividing P. aeruginosa cells. The ChIP-seq analysis of strains expressing ParB variants unable to dislocate from parSs showed that the ParB spreading ability is not required for ParB binding to half-parSs. Finally, a P. aeruginosa strain with mutated 25 half-parSs of the highest affinity towards ParB was constructed and analyzed. It showed altered ParB coverage of the oriC region and moderate changes in gene expression. Overall, this study characterizes a novel aspect of conserved bacterial chromosome segregation machinery.

ParA's Impact beyond Chromosome Segregation in Caulobacter crescentus

Maintaining proper chromosome inheritance after the completion of each cell cycle is paramount for bacterial survival. Mechanistic details remain incomplete for how bacteria manage to retain complete chromosomes after each cell cycle. In this study, we examined the potential roles of the partitioning protein ParA on chromosomal maintenance that go beyond triggering the onset of chromosome segregation in Caulobacter crescentus. Our data revealed that increasing the levels of ParA result in cells with multiple origins of replication in a DnaA-ATP-dependent manner. This ori supernumerary is retained even when expressing variants of ParA that are deficient in promoting chromosome segregation. Our data suggest that in Caulobacter ParA's impact on replication initiation is likely indirect, possibly through the effect of other cell cycle events. Overall, our data provide new insights into the highly interconnected network that drives the forward progression of the bacterial cell cycle. IMPORTANCE The successful generation of a daughter cell containing a complete copy of the chromosome requires the exquisite coordination of major cell cycle events. Any mistake in this coordination can be lethal, making these processes ideal targets for novel antibiotics. In this study, we focused on the coordination between the onset of chromosome replication, and the partitioning protein ParA. We demonstrate that altering the cellular levels of ParA causes cells to accumulate multiple origins of replication in Caulobacter crescentus. Our work provides important insights into the complex regulation involved in the coordination of the bacterial cell cycle.

Diverse Partners of the Partitioning ParB Protein in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In the majority of bacterial species, the tripartite ParAB-parS system, composed of an ATPase (ParA), a DNA-binding protein (ParB), and its target parS sequence(s), assists in the chromosome partitioning. ParB forms large nucleoprotein complexes at parS(s), located in the vicinity of origin of chromosomal replication (oriC), which after replication are subsequently positioned by ParA in cell poles. Remarkably, ParA and ParB participate not only in the chromosome segregation but through interactions with various cellular partners they are also involved in other cell cycle-related processes, in a species-specific manner. In this work, we characterized Pseudomonas aeruginosa ParB interactions with the cognate ParA, showing that the N-terminal motif of ParB is required for these interactions, and demonstrated that ParAB-parS-mediated rapid segregation of newly replicated ori domains prevented structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC)-mediated cohesion of sister chromosomes. Furthermore, using proteome-wide techniques, we have identified other ParB partners in P. aeruginosa, which encompass a number of proteins, including the nucleoid-associated proteins NdpA(PA3849) and NdpA2, MinE (PA3245) of Min system, and transcriptional regulators and various enzymes, e.g., CTP synthetase (PA3637). Among them are also NTPases PA4465, PA5028, PA3481, and FleN (PA1454), three of them displaying polar localization in bacterial cells. Overall, this work presents the spectrum of P. aeruginosa ParB partners and implicates the role of this protein in the cross-talk between chromosome segregation and other cellular processes. IMPORTANCE In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a Gram-negative pathogen causing life-threatening infections in immunocompromised patients, the ParAB-parS system is involved in the precise separation of newly replicated bacterial chromosomes. In this work, we identified and characterized proteins interacting with partitioning protein ParB. We mapped the domain of interactions with its cognate ParA partner and showed that ParB-ParA interactions are crucial for the chromosome segregation and for proper SMC action on DNA. We also demonstrated ParB interactions with other DNA binding proteins, metabolic enzymes, and NTPases displaying polar localization in the cells. Overall, this study uncovers novel players cooperating with the chromosome partition system in P. aeruginosa, supporting its important regulatory role in the bacterial cell cycle.

Proteolysis dependent cell cycle regulation in Caulobacter crescentus

Caulobacter crescentus, a Gram-negative alpha-proteobacterium, has surfaced as a powerful model system for unraveling molecular networks that control the bacterial cell cycle. A straightforward synchronization protocol and existence of many well-defined developmental markers has allowed the identification of various molecular circuits that control the underlying differentiation processes executed at the level of transcription, translation, protein localization and dynamic proteolysis. The oligomeric AAA+ protease ClpXP is a well-characterized example of an enzyme that exerts post-translational control over a number of pathways. Also, the proteolytic pathways of its candidate proteins are reported to play significant roles in regulating cell cycle and protein quality control. A detailed evaluation of the impact of its proteolysis on various regulatory networks of the cell has uncovered various significant cellular roles of this protease in C. crescentus. A deeper insight into the effects of regulatory proteolysis with emphasis on cell cycle progression could shed light on how cells respond to environmental cues and implement developmental switches. Perturbation of this network of molecular machines is also associated with diseases such as bacterial infections. Thus, research holds immense implications in clinical translation and health, representing a promising area for clinical advances in the diagnosis, therapeutics and prognosis.

Mechanisms for Chromosome Segregation in Bacteria

The process of DNA segregation, the redistribution of newly replicated genomic material to daughter cells, is a crucial step in the life cycle of all living systems. Here, we review DNA segregation in bacteria which evolved a variety of mechanisms for partitioning newly replicated DNA. Bacterial species such as Caulobacter crescentus and Bacillus subtilis contain pushing and pulling mechanisms that exert forces and directionality to mediate the moving of newly synthesized chromosomes to the bacterial poles. Other bacteria such as Escherichia coli lack such active segregation systems, yet exhibit a spontaneous de-mixing of chromosomes due to entropic forces as DNA is being replicated under the confinement of the cell wall. Furthermore, we present a synopsis of the main players that contribute to prokaryotic genome segregation. We finish with emphasizing the importance of bottom-up approaches for the investigation of the various factors that contribute to genome segregation.

Z-Ring-Associated Proteins Regulate Clustering of the Replication Terminus-Binding Protein ZapT in Caulobacter crescentus

Rapidly growing bacteria experience dynamic changes in chromosome architecture during chromosome replication and segregation, reflecting the importance of mechanisms that organize the chromosome globally and locally within a cell to maintain faithful transmission of genetic material across generations. During cell division in the model bacterium Caulobacter crescentus, the replication terminus of the chromosome is physically linked to the cytokinetic Z-ring at midcell.

Regulated organization of the chromosome is essential for faithful propagation of genetic information. In the model bacterium Caulobacter crescentus, the replication terminus of the chromosome is spatially arranged in close proximity to the cytokinetic Z-ring during the cell cycle. Although the Z-ring-associated proteins ZapA and ZauP interact with the terminus recognition protein ZapT, the molecular functions of the complex that physically links the terminus and the Z-ring remain obscure. In this study, we found that the physical linkage helps to organize the terminus DNA into a clustered structure. Neither ZapA nor ZauP was required for ZapT binding to the terminus DNA, but clustering of the ZapT-DNA complexes over the Z-ring was severely compromised in cells lacking ZapA or ZauP. Biochemical characterization revealed that ZapT, ZauP, and ZapA interacted directly to form a highly ordered ternary complex. Moreover, multiple ZapT molecules were sequestered by each ZauP oligomer. Investigation of the functional structure of ZapT revealed that the C terminus of ZapT specifically interacted with ZauP and was essential for timely positioning of the Z-ring in vivo. Based on these findings, we propose that ZauP-dependent oligomerization of ZapT-DNA complexes plays a distinct role in organizing the replication terminus and the Z-ring. The C termini of ZapT homologs share similar chemical properties, implying a common mechanism for the physical linkage between the terminus and the Z-ring in bacteria.

Characterization of ori and parS-like functions in secondary genome replicons in Deinococcus radiodurans

The mechanisms underlying multipartite genome maintenance and its functional significance in extraordinary radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans are not well understood. The sequences upstream to parAB operons in chrII (cisII) and MP (cisMP) could stabilize an otherwise, non-replicative colE1 plasmid, in D. radiodurans DnaA and cognate ParB proteins bound specifically with cisII and cisMP elements. The ΔcisII and ΔcisMP cells showed the reduced copy number of cognate replicons and radioresistance as compared with wild type. Fluorescent reporter-operator system inserted in chrI, chrII, and MP in wild type and cisII mutants showed the presence of all three replicons in wild-type cells. Although chrI was present in all the ΔcisII and ΔcisMP cells, nearly half of these cells had chrII and MP, respectively, and the other half had the reduced number of foci representing these replications. These results suggested that cisII and cisMP elements contain both origin of replication and parS-like functions and the secondary genome replicons (chrII and MP) are maintained independent of chrI and have roles in radioresistance of D. radiodurans.

GapR binds DNA through dynamic opening of its tetrameric interface

GapR is a nucleoid-associated protein that is an essential regulator of chromosome replication in the cell cycle model Caulobacter crescentus. Here, we demonstrate that free GapR is a homotetramer, but not a dimer as previously reported (Guo et al., Cell 175: 583–597, 2018). We have determined the crystal structure of GapR in complex with a 10-bp A-tract DNA, which has an open tetrameric conformation, different from the closed clamp conformation in the previously reported crystal structure of GapR/DNA complex. The free GapR adopts multiple conformations in dynamic exchange equilibrium, with the major conformation resembling the closed tetrameric conformation, while the open tetrameric conformation is a representative of minor conformers. As it is impossible for the circular genomic DNA to get into the central DNA binding tunnel of the major conformation, we propose that GapR initially binds DNA through the open conformation, and then undergoes structural rearrangement to form the closed conformation which fully encircles the DNA. GapR prefers to bind DNA with 10-bp consecutive A/T base pairs nonselectively (K_d ∼12 nM), while it can also bind GC-rich DNA sequence with a reasonable affinity of about 120 nM. Besides, our results suggest that GapR binding results in widening the minor groove of AT-rich DNA, instead of overtwisting DNA.

Chromatin Architectural Factors as Safeguards against Excessive Supercoiling during DNA Replication

Key DNA transactions, such as genome replication and transcription, rely on the speedy translocation of specialized protein complexes along a double-stranded, right-handed helical template. Physical tethering of these molecular machines during translocation, in conjunction with their internal architectural features, generates DNA topological strain in the form of template supercoiling. It is known that the build-up of transient excessive supercoiling poses severe threats to genome function and stability and that highly specialized enzymes—the topoisomerases (TOP)—have evolved to mitigate these threats. Furthermore, due to their intracellular abundance and fast supercoil relaxation rates, it is generally assumed that these enzymes are sufficient in coping with genome-wide bursts of excessive supercoiling. However, the recent discoveries of chromatin architectural factors that play important accessory functions have cast reasonable doubts on this concept. Here, we reviewed the background of these new findings and described emerging models of how these accessory factors contribute to supercoil homeostasis. We focused on DNA replication and the generation of positive (+) supercoiling in front of replisomes, where two accessory factors—GapR and HMGA2—from pro- and eukaryotic cells, respectively, appear to play important roles as sinks for excessive (+) supercoiling by employing a combination of supercoil constrainment and activation of topoisomerases. Looking forward, we expect that additional factors will be identified in the future as part of an expanding cellular repertoire to cope with bursts of topological strain. Furthermore, identifying antagonists that target these accessory factors and work synergistically with clinically relevant topoisomerase inhibitors could become an interesting novel strategy, leading to improved treatment outcomes.

Novel Divisome-Associated Protein Spatially Coupling the Z-Ring with the Chromosomal Replication Terminus in Caulobacter crescentus

Growing bacteria require careful tuning of cell division processes with dynamic organization of replicating chromosomes. In enteric bacteria, ZapA associates with the cytoskeletal Z-ring and establishes a physical linkage to the chromosomal replication terminus through its interaction with ZapB-MatP-DNA complexes. However, because ZapB and MatP are found only in enteric bacteria, it remains unclear how the Z-ring and the terminus are coordinated in the vast majority of bacteria. Here, we provide evidence that a novel conserved protein, termed ZapT, mediates colocalization of the Z-ring with the terminus in Caulobacter crescentus, a model organism that is phylogenetically distant from enteric bacteria. Given that ZapT facilitates cell division processes in C. crescentus, this study highlights the universal importance of the physical linkage between the Z-ring and the terminus in maintaining cell integrity.

Cell division requires proper spatial coordination with the chromosome, which undergoes dynamic changes during chromosome replication and segregation. FtsZ is a bacterial cytoskeletal protein that assembles into the Z-ring, providing a platform to build the cell division apparatus. In the model bacterium Caulobacter crescentus, the cellular localization of the Z-ring is controlled during the cell cycle in a chromosome replication-coupled manner. Although dynamic localization of the Z-ring at midcell is driven primarily by the replication origin-associated FtsZ inhibitor MipZ, the mechanism ensuring accurate positioning of the Z-ring remains unclear. In this study, we showed that the Z-ring colocalizes with the replication terminus region, located opposite the origin, throughout most of the C. crescentus cell cycle. Spatial organization of the two is mediated by ZapT, a previously uncharacterized protein that interacts with the terminus region and associates with ZapA and ZauP, both of which are part of the incipient division apparatus. While the Z-ring and the terminus region coincided with the presence of ZapT, colocalization of the two was perturbed in cells lacking zapT, which is accompanied by delayed midcellular positioning of the Z-ring. Moreover, cells overexpressing ZapT showed compromised positioning of the Z-ring and MipZ. These findings underscore the important role of ZapT in controlling cell division processes. We propose that ZapT acts as a molecular bridge that physically links the terminus region to the Z-ring, thereby ensuring accurate site selection for the Z-ring. Because ZapT is conserved in proteobacteria, these findings may define a general mechanism coordinating cell division with chromosome organization.

Chromosome Segregation Proteins as Coordinators of Cell Cycle in Response to Environmental Conditions

Chromosome segregation is a crucial stage of the cell cycle. In general, proteins involved in this process are DNA-binding proteins, and in most bacteria, ParA and ParB are the main players; however, some bacteria manage this process by employing other proteins, such as condensins. The dynamic interaction between ParA and ParB drives movement and exerts positioning of the chromosomal origin of replication (oriC) within the cell. In addition, both ParA and ParB were shown to interact with the other proteins, including those involved in cell division or cell elongation. The significance of these interactions for the progression of the cell cycle is currently under investigation. Remarkably, DNA binding by ParA and ParB as well as their interactions with protein partners conceivably may be modulated by intra- and extracellular conditions. This notion provokes the question of whether chromosome segregation can be regarded as a regulatory stage of the cell cycle. To address this question, we discuss how environmental conditions affect chromosome segregation and how segregation proteins influence other cell cycle processes.

Rules and Exceptions: The Role of Chromosomal ParB in DNA Segregation and Other Cellular Processes

The segregation of newly replicated chromosomes in bacterial cells is a highly coordinated spatiotemporal process. In the majority of bacterial species, a tripartite ParAB-parS system, composed of an ATPase (ParA), a DNA-binding protein (ParB), and its target(s) parS sequence(s), facilitates the initial steps of chromosome partitioning. ParB nucleates around parS(s) located in the vicinity of newly replicated oriCs to form large nucleoprotein complexes, which are subsequently relocated by ParA to distal cellular compartments. In this review, we describe the role of ParB in various processes within bacterial cells, pointing out interspecies differences. We outline recent progress in understanding the ParB nucleoprotein complex formation and its role in DNA segregation, including ori positioning and anchoring, DNA condensation, and loading of the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins. The auxiliary roles of ParBs in the control of chromosome replication initiation and cell division, as well as the regulation of gene expression, are discussed. Moreover, we catalog ParB interacting proteins. Overall, this work highlights how different bacterial species adapt the DNA partitioning ParAB-parS system to meet their specific requirements.