How does fingolimod (gilenya(®)) fit in the treatment algorithm for highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?

Sphingosine 1 phosphate promotes hypertension specific memory T cell trafficking in response to repeated hypertensive challenges

We have previously shown that effector memory (TEM) cells accumulate in the bone marrow (BM) and the kidney in response to l-NAME/high salt challenge. It is not well understood if measures to block the exodus of that effector memory cells prevent redistribution of these cells and protect from hypertension-induced renal damage. We hypothesized that that effector memory cells that accumulate in the bone marrow respond to repeated salt challenges and can be reactivated and circulate to the kidney. Thus, to determine if mobilization of bone marrow that effector memory cells and secondary lymphoid organs contribute to the hypertensive response to delayed salt challenges, we employed fingolimod (FTY720), an S1PR1 functional antagonist by downregulating S1PR, which inhibits the egress of that effector memory cells used effectively in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. We exposed wild-type mice to the l-NAME for 2 weeks, followed by a wash-out period, a high salt diet feeding for 4 weeks, a wash-out period, and then a second high salt challenge with or without fingolimod. A striking finding is that that effector memory cell egress was dramatically attenuated from the bone marrow of mice treated with fingolimod with an associated reduction of renal that effector memory cells. Mice receiving fingolimod were protected from hypertension. We found that wild-type mice that received fingolimod during the second high salt challenge had a marked decrease in the renal damage markers. CD3⁺ T cell infiltration was significantly attenuated in the fingolimod-treated mice. To further examine the redistribution of bone marrow that effector memory cells in response to repeated hypertensive stimuli, we harvested the bone marrow from CD45.2 mice following the repeated high salt protocol with or without fingolimod; that effector memory cells were sorted and adoptively transferred (AT) to CD45.1 naïve recipients. Adoptively transferred that effector memory cells from mice treated with fingolimod failed to home to the bone marrow and traffic to the kidney in response to a high salt diet. We conclude that memory T cell mobilization contributes to the predisposition to hypertension and end-organ damage for prolonged periods following an initial episode of hypertension. Blocking the exodus of reactivated that effector memory cells from the bone marrow protects the kidney from hypertension-induced end-organ damage.

Early High Efficacy Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Is the Best Predictor of Future Disease Activity Over 1 and 2 Years in a Norwegian Population-Based Registry

Background: Moderate and high efficacy disease modifying therapies (DMTs) have a profound effect on disease activity. The current treatment guidelines only recommend high efficacy DMTs for patients with highly active MS. The objective was to examine the impact of initial treatment choice in achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at year 1 and 2.

Methods: Using a real-world population-based registry with limited selection bias from the southeast of Norway, we determined how many patients achieved NEDA on moderate and high efficacy DMTs.

Results: 68.0% of patients who started a high efficacy DMT as the first drug achieved NEDA at year 1 and 52.4% at year 2 as compared to 36.0 and 19.4% of patients who started a moderate efficacy DMT as a first drug. The odds ratio (OR) of achieving NEDA on high efficacy drugs compared to moderate efficacy drugs as a first drug at year 1 was 3.9 (95% CI 2.4–6.1, p < 0.001). The OR for high efficacy DMT as the second drug was 2.5 (95% CI 1.7–3.9, p < 0.001), and was not significant for the third drug. Patients with a medium or high risk of disease activity were significantly more likely to achieve NEDA on a high efficacy therapy as a first drug compared to moderate efficacy therapy as a first drug.

Conclusions: Achieving NEDA at year 1 and 2 is significantly more likely in patients on high-efficacy disease modifying therapies than on moderate efficacy therapies, and the first choice of treatment is the most important. The immunomodulatory treatment guidelines should be updated to ensure early, high efficacy therapy for the majority of patients diagnosed with MS.

How to switch disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the French Multiple Sclerosis Society (SFSEP)

BACKGROUND

Today, there are no recommendations on switching disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVES

To establish guidelines on switching DMTs MS.

METHODS

A Steering Committee composed of seven MS experts from the French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) defined 15 proposals. These proposals were then submitted to a Rating Group, composed of 48 French MS experts, for evaluation. The proposals were classified as 'appropriate', 'inappropriate' or 'uncertain'.

RESULTS

Switching from a first-line therapy to another first-line therapy or a second-line therapy could be done without a washout period. Switching from a second-line therapy to a first-line therapy could be done without a washout period with fingolimod or natalizumab, after 3 months with ocrelizumab or mitoxantrone, and, if disease activity occurs with alemtuzumab or cladribine. The switch from a second-line therapy to another second-line therapy could be done after a washout period of 1 month with fingolimod or natalizumab, after 3 months with ocrelizumab, after 6 months with mitoxantrone, and, if disease activity occurs, with alemtuzumab or cladribine.

CONCLUSION

This expert consensus approach provides physicians with some guidelines on optimizing the benefit/risk ratio when switching DMTs in patients with MS.

Identification of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis eligible for high-efficacy therapies

Relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) presents a highly variable clinical evolution among patients, and its management should be personalized. Although there is no cure at present, effective disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are available. Selection of the most appropriate DMT for each patient is influenced by several clinical, radiological and demographic aspects as well as personal preferences that, at times, are not covered in the regulatory criteria. This may be a source of difficulty, especially in certain situations where so-called 'high-efficacy DMTs' (usually considered second-line) could be of greater benefit to the patient. In this narrative review, we discuss evidence and experience, and propose a pragmatic guidance on decision-making with respect to the indication and management of high-efficacy DMT in adult patients with RMS based on expert opinion.

Brazilian Consensus for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Brazilian Academy of Neurology and Brazilian Committee on Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis

The expanding therapeutic arsenal in multiple sclerosis (MS) has allowed for more effective and personalized treatment, but the choice and management of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is becoming increasingly complex. In this context, experts from the Brazilian Committee on Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis and the Neuroimmunology Scientific Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology have convened to establish this Brazilian Consensus for the Treatment of MS, based on their understanding that neurologists should be able to prescribe MS DMTs according to what is better for each patient, based on up-to-date evidence and practice. We herein propose practical recommendations for the treatment of MS, with the main focus on the choice and management of DMTs, as well as present a review of the scientific rationale supporting therapeutic strategies in MS.

Impact of trial design and patient heterogeneity on the identification of clinically effective therapies for progressive MS

Clinically effective immunomodulatory therapies have been developed for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but they have generally not translated to a corresponding slowing of disability accumulation in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Since disability is multifaceted, progressive patients are heterogeneous, and the drivers of disease progression are still unclear, it has been difficult to identify the most informative outcome measures for progressive trials. Historically, secondary outcome measures have focused on inflammatory measures, which contributed to the recent identification of immunomodulatory therapies benefiting younger patients with more inflammatory progressive MS. Meanwhile, agents capable of treating late-stage disease have remained elusive. Consequently, measures of neurodegeneration are becoming common. Here, we review completed clinical trials testing immunomodulatory therapies in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) and discuss the features contributing to trial design variability in relation to trial outcomes, and how efforts toward better patient stratification and inclusion of reliable progression markers could improve outcomes.

Catastrophic outcome of patients with a rebound after Natalizumab treatment discontinuation

INTRODUCTION

Natalizumab (NTZ) is an effective drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In some patients discontinuation is mandatory due to the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. However, severe clinical and radiological worsening has been described after drug cessation. Our aim was to describe the clinical and radiological features of the rebound phenomenon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients switched from NTZ to Fingolimod (FTY) who had presented a rebound after discontinuation were selected. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected.

RESULTS

Four JC virus positive patients were included. The mean disease duration was 9.5 years (SD: 4.12) with a mean time of 3.1 years on NTZ. All patients started FTY within 3-4 months. Neurological deterioration started in a mean time of 3.5 months (SD: 2.08) with multifocal involvement: 75% motor disturbances, 50% cognitive impairment, 25% seizures. The average worsening in Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] was of 3.25 points (SD: 2.33). The MRI showed a very large increase in T2 and gadolinium-enhanced lesions (mean: 23.67, SD: 18.58). All patients received 5 days of IV methylprednisolone, one patient required plasma exchange. All the patients presented neurological deterioration with an EDSS worsening of 1.13 points (SD: 0.48). After the rebound three patients continued treatment with FTY, only one patient restarted NTZ.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of NTZ treatment may trigger a severe rebound with marked clinical and radiological worsening. A very careful evaluation of benefit-risk should be considered before NTZ withdrawal, and a close monitoring and a short washout period is recommended after drug withdrawal.

The outbreak fingolimod cardiovascular side effects in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patient: A longitudinal study in an Iranian population

BACKGROUND

Fingolimod (FTY-720) has shown efficacy in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), while some side effects of this drug have been recognized that the most important is cardiovascular side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cardiovascular side effects of FTY-720. However, the effect of fingolimod on cardiac has not been well recognized. This study was designed to evaluate the cardiovascular side effects of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patient in an Iranian population.

METHODS

This prospective clinical trial study was performed on 200 RRMS patients. The patients received a single daily oral dose of fingolimod 0.5 mg. During the first 6 hours after the first fingolimod dose, the patients' vital signs and electrocardiographic traces were continuously monitored. Moreover, the patients followed up over 6 months after receiving fingolimod.

RESULTS

The results showed that pulse rate (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (BP) (P < 0.001), and diastolic BP (P < 0.001) were decreased significantly during 6 hours after receiving the first dose of fingolimod. The most reduction in vital sign was observed in 3 hours. Arrhythmia, bradycardia, and dizziness were the other complications of fingolimod, which were detected in our study.

CONCLUSION

All the side effects such as hypotension and bradycardia were happened in first 3 hours after receiving the fingolimod. Indeed, we advise clinicians to monitor the patients for first 6 hours after initiation of fingolimod to decrease worse side effects.

Patient experience and practice trends in multiple sclerosis - clinical utility of fingolimod

Targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate pathway with orally available immune-modulatory fingolimod (Gilenya™) therapy ameliorates relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) by decreasing relapse rate as shown in FREEDOMS and TRANSFORMS. Fingolimod has also been shown to be superior to interferon-beta therapy as evidenced by TRANSFORMS. Albeit multiple benefits in treatment of multiple sclerosis including high efficacy and ease of administration, potential untoward effects such as cardiotoxicity, risk of infection, and cancer exist, thus mandating careful screening and frequent monitoring of patients undergoing treatment with fingolimod. This review outlines mechanism of action, observations, side effects, and practice guidelines on use of fingolimod in treatment of RRMS.

Intractable and highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis - role of alemtuzumab

Alemtuzumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody that was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the management of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). It has been utilized for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, bone marrow and renal transplantation, or graft versus host disease. Because of its immunomodulatory properties, it was brought into clinical development in MS. One Phase II (CAMMS223) and two Phase III clinical trials (CARE-MSI and -II) have evaluated the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Even though its efficacy profile and long-lasting effect have attracted much interest among physicians and patients, it has significant potential adverse effects that may limit its use to patients with active disease. Here, we review the history of drug development of alemtuzumab. Furthermore, we outline the postulated mechanisms of action, clinical evidence, and safety of alemtuzumab for its use as a disease-modifying agent in active and highly active MS.

Cardiovascular effects of fingolimod: A review article

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic auto-immune disease. Most therapeutic strategies for treatment of this disease direct immune modulation and control of inflammatory processes. First-line therapeutic agents showed moderate efficacy and frequent side-effects with moderate efficacy in trials. Their parental administration and limited long-term adherence restrict their efficacy compared with second-line therapies. Fingolimod as a second-line therapeutic agent has been shown to reduce annualized relapse rate, risk of disability progression and inflammatory activity of relapsing MS. Safety and efficacy FTY720: Safety and efficacy issues are the main metrics for judgment of drug efficacy. In this article, we focus on cardiovascular effects of FTY720 treatment. Effect of FTY720 on rate and rhythm, impact of FTY720 on endothelial cells, its atheroprotective effects, its effects on cardiac transplantation outcomes, vascular complications of FTY720, effects of FTY720 on endocrine functions and interaction of FTY720 with cardioactive agents are explained in this review article.

Fingolimod after natalizumab and the risk of short-term relapse

OBJECTIVE

To determine early risk of relapse after switch from natalizumab to fingolimod; to compare the switch experience to that in patients switching from interferon-β/glatiramer acetate (IFN-β/GA) and those previously treatment naive; and to determine predictors of time to first relapse on fingolimod.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the MSBase Registry. Relapse rates (RRs) for each patient group were compared using adjusted negative binomial regression. Survival analyses coupled with adjusted Cox regression were used to model predictors of time to first relapse on fingolimod.

RESULTS

A total of 536 patients (natalizumab-fingolimod [n = 89]; IFN-β/GA-fingolimod [n = 350]; naive-fingolimod [n = 97]) were followed up for a median 10 months. In the natalizumab-fingolimod group, there was a small increase in RR on fingolimod (annualized RR [ARR] 0.38) relative to natalizumab (ARR 0.26; p = 0.002). RRs were generally low across all patient groups in the first 9 months on fingolimod (RR 0.001-0.13). However, 30% of patients with disease activity on natalizumab relapsed within the first 6 months on fingolimod. Independent predictors of time to first relapse on fingolimod were the number of relapses in the prior 6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59 per relapse; p = 0.002) and a gap in treatment of 2-4 months compared to no gap (HR 2.10; p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

RRs after switch to fingolimod were low in all patient groups. The strongest predictor of relapse on fingolimod was prior relapse activity. Based on our data, we recommend a maximum 2-month treatment gap for switches to fingolimod to decrease the hazard of relapse.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that RRs are not higher in patients with multiple sclerosis switching to fingolimod from natalizumab compared to those patients switching to fingolimod from other therapies.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Fingolimod is a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator with a novel mechanism of action and the first oral drug approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Fingolimod reduces relapses more effectively than intramuscular interferon β1a and delays disability progression. Associated safety risks are bradyarrhythmia and atrioventricular block following the initial dose, requiring monitoring.

AREAS COVERED

This article examines the characteristics of fingolimod, its pharmacokinetic properties and the efficacy and tolerability in MS. Information on the pharmacology and mechanisms of action is also provided.

EXPERT OPINION

Fingolimod is an effective therapy for relapsing forms of MS in a convenient oral dose. Fingolimod may target not only inflammation but potentially also neurodegeneration. Antagonizing astrocyte sphingosine signaling may help explain the reduction in cerebral atrophy observed in Phase III trials. Long-term data about the safety of fingolimod are needed.