Anesthesia and analgesia for experimental craniotomy in mice and rats: a systematic scoping review comparing the years 2009 and 2019

Combined medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol anesthesia in mice has a central stress-relieving effect similar to that of isoflurane anesthesia

Although the combination of medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (Me/Mi/Bu) is a commonly used surgical anesthetic for small laboratory animals, the effects of Me/Mi/Bu on the central nervous system remain to be confirmed, and some researchers have questioned the use of Me/Mi/Bu as a surgical anesthetic. Herein we employed cFos-immunohistochemistry to assess the stress-relieving effects of Me/Mi/Bu and isoflurane on the murine brain in response to restraint stress. The results demonstrated that the number of cFos-immunopositive cells in the paraventricular nucleus was significantly lower in the mice anesthetized with Me/Mi/Bu or isoflurane compared to those that were not anesthetized. These findings suggest that Me/Mi/Bu exerts an effect on the brain that is similar to that of isoflurane in alleviating the response to surgical procedures.

Animal welfare assessment after controlled cortical impact in CD-1 mice - A model of posttraumatic epilepsy

The ethical use of laboratory animals requires that the benefits of an experimental study are carefully weighed against potential harm to the animals. In traumatic brain injury (TBI) research, ethical concerns are especially relevant to severe TBI, after which animals may experience suffering, depending on the implementation of refinement measures such as (1) postsurgical analgesia during the initial period following TBI and (2) humane endpoints. However, despite the frequent use of rodent models such as fluid percussion injury (FPI) and controlled cortical impact (CCI) in rats or mice, there is only one recent study that applied assessment of welfare to a severe TBI model, the FPI model in rats. In the present pilot study in a CCI mouse model of posttraumatic epilepsy, we assessed animal welfare by a brain injury-specific severity scoresheet. Furthermore, nest building was used as a sensitive indicator of health and welfare in laboratory mice. Sham mice that underwent craniotomy but not CCI were used for comparison. Craniotomy and CCI were performed under anesthesia with isoflurane, followed by 3 days of postsurgical analgesia with the opioid l-methadone. Mannitol was used to prevent the head pain caused by increased intracranial pressure. Using the TBI-specific scoresheet to describe and monitor potential distress in animals, moderately increased scores were determined in CCI mice only over the first 2 days after surgery, indicating that animal suffering in this model is transitory. Similarly, significantly impaired nest building was observed at 1 but not 7 days after CCI. We conclude that with effective postsurgical analgesia and mannitol behavioral recovery is rapid in mice after CCI.

Testing perioperative meloxicam analgesia to enhance welfare while preserving model validity in an inflammation-induced seizure model

Despite the international effort to improve laboratory animal welfare through the 3R principles (Reduce, Refine, Replace), many scientists still fail to implement and report their assessment of pain and well-being, likely due to concerns regarding the potential effects of analgesics on experimental outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether refining our viral encephalitis model with perioperative analgesia could enhance well-being and recovery after intracerebral virus infection without impacting disease outcomes. We routinely use the Theiler's Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus (TMEV) model to study virus-induced epilepsy. Given the crucial role of immune cell activation in acute seizure development, we evaluated the effects of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam on inflammation, neurodegeneration, and neuronal cell proliferation at 7 days post-infection (dpi). Overall, the impact of virus infection on well-being was less severe than anticipated, and meloxicam treatment did not affect well-being or nest building behavior in TMEV-infected mice. Furthermore, meloxicam treatment did not influence key experimental readouts such as seizure burden, central inflammatory response, neurodegeneration, or neuronal proliferation within the hippocampus. Notably, animals experiencing seizures displayed heightened inflammatory responses and neurodegeneration, which were not influenced by meloxicam treatment. In summary, perioperative analgesia did not compromise key outcome measures such as seizure frequency, inflammation, and neurodegeneration or -regeneration in the TMEV model. However, it also did not add any significant benefits to well-being in the first week after intracranial injections.

Reporting practices of anesthetic and analgesic use in rodent orthopedic research

The Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines, along with the updated ARRIVE 2.0, provide a crucial framework for transparent reporting in animal research. These guidelines enhance the quality and reproducibility of studies while supporting animal welfare. However, concerns persist regarding the reporting practices of biomedical researchers in scientific articles related to anesthesia and analgesia despite the endorsement of ARRIVE guidelines, as has been demonstrated in previous descriptive analyses. The current study systematically reviews articles published from 2016 to 2023 that involve rodent orthopedic surgeries. These procedures were selected as our focus given that anesthetics and analgesics are essential for such high impact procedures. We highlight significant reporting gaps, noting that anesthetic and analgesic details were missing in 29.4% and 74.8% of the articles, respectively. Our findings reveal no correlation between reporting completeness and journal impact factors, indicating that this issue generalized across journals. Furthermore, among articles that did report analgesia use, we observed a low prevalence of multimodal analgesia. Overall, this study underscores the urgent need to develop effective strategies to improve reporting of anesthesia and analgesia in animal studies to enhance ethical standards, animal welfare, and the robustness and reproducibility of research.

Evaluation of variation in preclinical electroencephalographic (EEG) spectral power across multiple laboratories and experiments: An EQIPD study

The European Quality In Preclinical Data (EQIPD) consortium was born from the fact that publications report challenges with the robustness, rigor, and/or validity of research data, which may impact decisions about whether to proceed with further preclinical testing or to advance to clinical testing, as well as draw conclusions on the predictability of preclinical models. To address this, a consortium including multiple research laboratories from academia and industry participated in a series of electroencephalography (EEG) experiments in mice aimed to detect sources of variance and to gauge how protocol harmonisation and data analytics impact such variance. Ultimately, the goal of this first ever between-laboratory comparison of EEG recordings and analyses was to validate the principles that supposedly increase data quality, robustness, and comparability. Experiments consisted of a Localisation phase, which aimed to identify the factors that influence between-laboratory variability, a Harmonisation phase to evaluate whether harmonisation of standardized protocols and centralised processing and data analysis reduced variance, and a Ring-Testing phase to verify the ability of the harmonised protocol to generate consistent findings. Indeed, between-laboratory variability reduced from Localisation to Harmonisation and this reduction remained during the Ring-Testing phase. Results obtained in this multicentre preclinical qEEG study also confirmed the complex nature of EEG experiments starting from the surgery and data collection through data pre-processing to data analysis that ultimately influenced the results and contributed to variance in findings across laboratories. Overall, harmonisation of protocols and centralized data analysis were crucial in reducing laboratory-to-laboratory variability. To this end, it is recommended that standardized guidelines be updated and followed for collection and analysis of preclinical EEG data.

Refining pain management in mice by comparing multimodal analgesia and NSAID monotherapy for neurosurgical procedures

While neurosurgical interventions are frequently used in laboratory mice, refinement efforts to optimize analgesic management based on multimodal approaches appear to be rather limited. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of combinations of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug carprofen, a sustained-release formulation of the opioid buprenorphine, and the local anesthetic bupivacaine with carprofen monotherapy. Female and male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to isoflurane anesthesia and an intracranial electrode implant procedure. Given the multidimensional nature of postsurgical pain and distress, various physiological, behavioral, and biochemical parameters were applied for their assessment. The analysis revealed alterations in Neuro scores, home cage locomotion, body weight, nest building, mouse grimace scales, and fecal corticosterone metabolites. A composite measure scheme allowed the allocation of individual mice to severity classes. The comparison between groups failed to indicate the superiority of multimodal regimens over high-dose NSAID monotherapy. In conclusion, our findings confirmed the informative value of various parameters for assessment of pain and distress following neurosurgical procedures in mice. While all drug regimens were well tolerated in control mice, our data suggest that the total drug load should be carefully considered for perioperative management. Future studies would be of interest to assess potential synergies of drug combinations with lower doses of carprofen.

Krishnan L, Abelson KSP. Refinement of the motorised laminectomy-assisted rat spinal cord injury model by analgesic treatment

Usage and reporting of analgesia in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) have been sparse and requires proper attention. The majority of experimental SCI research uses rats as an animal model. This study aimed to probe into the effects of some commonly used regimens with NSAIDs and opioids on well-being of the rats as well as on the functional outcome of the model. This eight-week study used forty-two female Wistar rats (Crl: WI), randomly and equally divided into 6 treatment groups, viz. I) tramadol (5mg/kg) and buprenorphine (0.05mg/kg); II) carprofen (5mg/kg) and buprenorphine (0.05mg/kg); III) carprofen (5mg/kg); IV) meloxicam (1mg/kg) and buprenorphine (0.05mg/kg); V) meloxicam (1mg/kg); and VI) no analgesia (0.5 ml sterile saline). Buprenorphine was administered twice daily whereas other treatments were given once daily for five days post-operatively. Injections were given subcutaneously. All animals underwent dental burr-assisted laminectomy at the T10-T11 vertebra level. A custom-built calibrated spring-loaded 200 kilodynes force deliverer was used to induce severe SCI. Weekly body weight scores, Rat Grimace Scale (RGS), and dark-phase home cage activity were used as markers for well-being. Weekly Basso Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scores served as markers for functionality together with Novel Object Recognition test (NOR) at week 8 and terminal histopathology using area of vacuolisation and live neuronal count from the ventral horns of spinal cord. It was concluded that the usage of analgesia improved animal wellbeing while having no effects on the functional aspects of the animal model in comparison to the animals that received no analgesics.