1
|
Lu X, He M, Yu L, Gou Z. Is repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy possible for surgical axillary staging among patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence? Cancer 2023; 129:1492-1501. [PMID: 36807239 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of studies assessing the survival of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy (rSLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for surgical axillary staging among patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with IBTR from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2017. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) between the rSLNB and ALND groups. RESULTS Of the 2141 women with IBTR after lumpectomy and SLNB, 524 did not receive surgical axillary staging (nonsurgery group) and 1617 patients who did undergo axilla surgery received either rSLNB or ALND as axillary staging (1268 with rSLNB and 349 with ALND). The 10-year OS rates were 61.9% for the nonsurgery and 73.8% for axilla surgery groups (p = .001). In the 1:1 matched cohorts, the 10-year OS rates were 61.4% for the nonsurgery and 69.1% for axilla surgery groups (p = .072). After adjusting for other factors, axillary surgery treatment of IBTR was an independent favorable factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90; p = .004). Within the axilla surgery group, rSLNB presented a comparable 10-year OS to the ALND cohort (log-rank test p = .054). Multivariate Cox analysis, as well as subgroup analysis, showed that rSLNB had a similar benefit to ALND (10-year OS; HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.88-1.58; p = .268). CONCLUSIONS The results of this cohort study suggested that receiving surgical axillary staging was associated with better survival of IBTR patients, and rSLNB had a similar long-term survival outcome as ALND. rSLNB might be considered for surgical axillary staging among patients with IBTR after lumpectomy and initial SLNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xunxi Lu
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mengting He
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Luoting Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zongchao Gou
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morgan JL, Cheng V, Barry PA, Copson E, Cutress RI, Dave R, Elsberger B, Fairbrother P, Hartup S, Hogan B, Horgan K, Kirwan CC, McIntosh SA, O'Connell RL, Patani N, Potter S, Rattay T, Sheehan L, Wyld L, Kim B. The MARECA (national study of management of breast cancer locoregional recurrence and oncological outcomes) study: National practice questionnaire of United Kingdom multi-disciplinary decision making. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1510-1519. [PMID: 35410760 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence based guidelines for the optimal management of breast cancer locoregional recurrence (LRR) are limited, with potential for variation in clinical practice. This national practice questionnaire (NPQ) was designed to establish the current practice of UK breast multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) regarding LRR management. METHODS UK breast units were invited to take part in the MARECA study MDT NPQ. Scenario-based questions were used to elicit preference in pre-operative staging investigations, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. RESULTS 822 MDT members across 42 breast units (out of 144; 29%) participated in the NPQ (February-August 2021). Most units (95%) routinely performed staging CT scan, but bone scan was selectively performed (31%). For patients previously treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy, few units (7%) always/usually offered repeat BCS. However, in the absence of radiotherapy, most units (90%) always/usually offered repeat BCS. For patients presenting with isolated local recurrence following previous BCS and SLNB (sentinel lymph node biopsy), most units (95%) advocated repeat SLNB. Where SLNs could not be identified, 86% proceeded to a four-node axillary sampling procedure. For ER positive, HER2 negative, node negative local recurrence, 10% of units always/usually offered chemotherapy. For ER positive, HER2 negative, node positive local recurrence, this recommendation increased to 64%. For triple negative breast cancer local recurrence, 90% of units always/usually offered chemotherapy. CONCLUSION This survey has highlighted where consistencies and variations exist in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer LRR. However, further research is required to determine how these management patterns influence patient outcomes, which will further refine optimal treatment pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna L Morgan
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
| | - Vinton Cheng
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Peter A Barry
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Ellen Copson
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ramsey I Cutress
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Rajiv Dave
- The Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Beatrix Elsberger
- Aberdeen Breast Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK
| | | | - Sue Hartup
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Brian Hogan
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Kieran Horgan
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Cliona C Kirwan
- The Nightingale Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oglesby Cancer Research Building, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Stuart A McIntosh
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Rachel L O'Connell
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Neill Patani
- Department of Breast Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Shelley Potter
- Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Tim Rattay
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE2 2LX, UK
| | - Lisa Sheehan
- Wessex Deanery, Southern House, Otterbourne, Winchester, SO21 2RU, UK
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Baek Kim
- The Breast Unit at the Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li FM, Xu DY, Xu Q, Yuan Y. Breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer and their correlation with the expression of polyligand proteoglycan-1. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:3113-3120. [PMID: 35647115 PMCID: PMC9082713 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a malignant tumor with an unclear etiology and is the most common malignant tumor in women. Surgery is the main clinical treatment for breast cancer. Although traditional total mastectomy combined with axillary lymph node dissection is effective, it can result in shoulder dysfunction, especially in middle-aged and elderly patients with breast cancer with weak constitution and other underlying diseases. Furthermore, the postoperative quality of life is poor.
AIM To assess breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer treatment and their correlation with polyligand proteoglycan-1.
METHODS Overall, 80 patients with breast cancer treated in our hospital from January 2021 to July 2021 were retrospectively selected and divided into an observation group (n = 44) and control group (n = 36) according to the treatment plan. The observation group was treated with breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy, and the control group was treated with total breast resection. Simultaneously, immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the expression of syndecan-1 (SDC-1) in the lesions, and its relationship with clinicopathological findings was analyzed.
RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay in the observation group were 65.51 ± 9.94 mL, 65.59 ± 9.40 min, and 14.80 ± 3.03 d, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 11.36%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The positive expression rate of SDC-1 in the observation group was 25.00%, and there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). The positive expression rate of SDC-1 in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II was 14.29%, which was significantly lower than that in patients with AJCC stage I (P < 0.05). The positive expression of SDC-1 had no significant relationship with age, course of disease, site, tissue type, and treatment plan (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION Breast preservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer treatment have fewer complications and quicker recovery than those treated with total breast resection. Low SDC-1 expression in breast cancer lesions is related to AJCC staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fu-Ming Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Dan-Ying Xu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qi Xu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yan Yuan
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ge I, Erbes T, Juhasz-Böss I. Prognostic value and management of regional lymph nodes in locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306:943-957. [PMID: 35122159 PMCID: PMC9470629 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06352-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Management of regional lymph nodes in breast cancer recurrence has been heterogeneous. To facilitate clinical practice, this review aims to give an overview on the prognosis, staging and operative management of (inapparent) regional lymph nodes. METHODS Current national and international guidelines are reviewed and a structured search of the literature between Jan 1, 1999 and Feb 1, 2021 on the repeat sentinel node biopsy (re-SNB) procedure was performed. RESULTS Positive regional lymph nodes in recurrent breast cancer indicate a poorer outcome with axillary recurrences being the most favorable tumor site among all nodal regions. Most preferred staging method is ultrasound ± guided biopsy. PET-CT, scintimammography, SPECT-CT may improve visualization of affected lymph nodes outside the axilla. Concerning operative management 30 articles on re-SNB were identified with a mean harvesting rate of 66.4%, aberrant drainage and aberrant metastasis in 1/3 of the cases. Total rate of metastasis is 17.9%. After previous axillary dissection (ALND) the re-SNB has a significantly lower harvesting rate and higher aberrant drainage and aberrant metastasis rate. The prognostic outcome after re-SNB has been favorable. CONCLUSION Nodal status in recurrent disease has prognostic value. The choice of operative management of clinically inapparent regional lymph nodes during local recurrence should be based on the previous nodal staging method. Patients with previous ALND should be spared a second systematic ALND. Re-SNB or no axillary surgery at all are possible alternatives. Lymphoscintigraphy may be performed to identify extraaxillary drainage. However, for definite recommendations randomized controlled studies are heavily needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabell Ge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Thalia Erbes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingolf Juhasz-Böss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|