Surgical options for patients with early-stage breast cancer and pathogenic germline variants: an oncologist perspectives

Breast cancer continues to be the most common cancer diagnosed among women worldwide. Family history of breast cancer is frequently encountered, and 5-15% of patients may carry inherited pathogenic germline variants, identification of which can be helpful for both; patients themselves and their unaffected close relatives. The availability and affordability of molecular diagnostics, like next generation sequencing (NGS), had resulted in wider adoption of such technologies to detect pathogenic variants of cancer-predisposing genes. International guidelines had recently broadened the indications for germline genetic testing to include much more patients, and also expanded the testing to include multi-gene panels, while some professional societies are calling for universal testing of all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer, regardless of their age, personal or family history. The risk of experiencing a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) or ipsilateral recurrence, is well known. Such risk is highest with variants like BRCA1 and BRCA2, but less well-studied with other less common variants. The optimal local therapy for women with BRCA-associated breast cancer remains controversial, but tends to be aggressive and may involve bilateral mastectomies, which may not have any survival advantage. Additionally, surgical management of unaffected women, known to carry a pathogenic cancer-predisposing gene, may vary from surveillance to bilateral mastectomies, too. The oncological safety, and the higher satisfaction of unaffected women and patients with new surgical techniques, like the skin-sparing (SSM) and nipple-sparing (NSM) mastectomies, eased up the process of counselling. In this review, we address the oncological safety of less aggressive surgical options for both; patients and unaffected carriers.

Impact of Atypical Hyperplasia at Surgical Margins on breast cancer outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) is associated with a higher risk of future breast cancer. However, whether AH found at margins in patients with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) needs re-excision is not well-defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of AH at the surgical margins on the local recurrence and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with NAC and BCS.

Methods

A retrospective analysis comparing patients who treated with NAC and BCS with AH at the margins to those without AH was performed.

Results

598 patients were included in this study. The 5-year rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) were 4.6% and 6.2% in patients with and without AH, respectively. No significant differences were observed among the two groups in terms of IBTR, DMFS, or OS. HER2 overexpressing breast cancer patients with severe AH at margins have a significantly higher risk of IBTR compared to those without severe AH.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the presence of AH at the surgical margins of BCS in patients who received NAC does not appear to increase the risk of ipsilateral breast cancer. Therefore, there is no need for surgeons to routinely perform additional re-excision of AH found at the margins of BCS in these patients. However, selective re-excision should be considered in certain cases, particularly in patients with HER2 overexpression.

Preferences Regarding Breast Surgery Omission Among Patients With Breast Cancer Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Currently, several ongoing prospective studies are investigating the safety of breast surgery omission in patients with breast cancer who are exceptional responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is little information about the preferences of these patients regarding omission of breast surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire survey to assess preferences regarding omission of breast surgery among patients with breast cancer who had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive or estrogen receptor-negative tumors and good clinical response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients' estimation of the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after definitive surgery or breast surgery omission was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 93 patients, only 22 (23.7%) said they would omit breast surgery. Under the scenario of omitting breast surgery, the 5-year IBTR rate estimated by patients who said they would omit breast surgery was significantly lower (median, 10%) than the rate estimated by patients who preferred undergoing definitive surgery (median, 30%) (p=0.017).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of our surveyed patients who were willing to omit breast surgery was low. Patients who said they preferred to omit breast surgery overestimated the 5-year IBTR risk.

Is repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy possible for surgical axillary staging among patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence?

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of studies assessing the survival of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy (rSLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for surgical axillary staging among patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with IBTR from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2017. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) between the rSLNB and ALND groups.

RESULTS

Of the 2141 women with IBTR after lumpectomy and SLNB, 524 did not receive surgical axillary staging (nonsurgery group) and 1617 patients who did undergo axilla surgery received either rSLNB or ALND as axillary staging (1268 with rSLNB and 349 with ALND). The 10-year OS rates were 61.9% for the nonsurgery and 73.8% for axilla surgery groups (p = .001). In the 1:1 matched cohorts, the 10-year OS rates were 61.4% for the nonsurgery and 69.1% for axilla surgery groups (p = .072). After adjusting for other factors, axillary surgery treatment of IBTR was an independent favorable factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90; p = .004). Within the axilla surgery group, rSLNB presented a comparable 10-year OS to the ALND cohort (log-rank test p = .054). Multivariate Cox analysis, as well as subgroup analysis, showed that rSLNB had a similar benefit to ALND (10-year OS; HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.88-1.58; p = .268).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this cohort study suggested that receiving surgical axillary staging was associated with better survival of IBTR patients, and rSLNB had a similar long-term survival outcome as ALND. rSLNB might be considered for surgical axillary staging among patients with IBTR after lumpectomy and initial SLNB.

Is repeat breast conservation possible for small ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence?

BACKGROUND

Most cases of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) involve small tumors. Although a few guidelines recommend mastectomy, several patients prefer repeat BCS (re-BCS). This study aimed to compare re-BCS and mastectomy in terms of prognosis in patients with IBTR and to identify candidates for re-BCS.

METHODS

The data of patients with small IBTR between 1999 and 2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models and propensity score matching were applied.

RESULTS

Of the 3648 patients with IBTR, 2831 (77.6%) underwent mastectomy and 817 (22.4%) underwent re-BCS. The multivariate Cox model showed that re-BCS was associated with a worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.342; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.084-1.663) and BCSS (HR, 1.454; 95% CI, 1.004-2.105) compared with mastectomy. The omission of radiation after re-BCS was associated with worse survival overall and especially in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative IBTR (HR, 1.384; 95% CI, 1.110-1.724; and HR, 1.577; 95% CI, 1.075-2.314, respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed in the OS and BCSS between re-BCS with radiation and mastectomy. Subgroup analysis indicated that the surgical approach was not an independent factor for survival in the ER-positive patients with IBTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-BCS should be considered with caution in patients with small IBTR. However, a positive ER status can be an important factor for choosing re-BCS, and radiation therapy may improve oncological safety after re-BCS.

LAY SUMMARY

Repeat breast-conserving surgery (re-BCS) was investigated to determine if it is safe for patients with small ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This population-based cohort study included 2831 patients with small IBTR. Re-BCS was associated with a worse overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival compared with mastectomy. Further analysis found that the IBTR estrogen receptor status was an important basis for choosing re-BCS, and radiation may improve oncological safety after re-BCS.

Clinical Course and Predictors of Subsequent Recurrence and Survival of Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical course and long-term outcomes of patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and identify independent prognostic factors for further recurrence.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the records of 327 patients who experienced IBTR after undergoing BCS for breast cancer at Asan Medical Center during 1990–2013. Overall survival (OS) after IBTR and cumulative incidence rates of recurrences after IBTR were calculated. The association of clinicopathological factors with survival and the development of further recurrence after IBTR was determined in multivariate analysis.

Results

At a median follow-up of 127.7 months, 97 patients experienced recurrence after IBTR. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence rates of recurrence after IBTR were 32% and 41%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year OS rates after IBTR were 86.6% and 70.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, hormone receptor negativity was associated with decreases in OS after IBTR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–6.78). Patients with longer disease-free interval (DFI) had decreased risks of second recurrence (HR .99, 95% CI .99–1.00), and second locoregional recurrence (LRR) (HR .98, 95% CI .97–.99). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) of IBTR was associated with increased recurrence rates (second recurrence-free survival, HR 3.58, 95% CI 2.16–5.94; second LRR free survival, HR 5.21, 95% CI 2.77–9.78; second distant metastasis-free survival, 2.11, 95% CI 1.04–4.30) and lower survival rates (OS after IBTR, HR 4.64, 95% CI 2.23–9.67).

Conclusions

Despite subsequent recurrences during long-term follow-up, the survival rates after IBTR remained high. Patients with hormone receptor-negative tumors, shorter DFI, and tumors that present LVI of IBTR had higher risks for recurrence and poor survival rates after IBTR. The study findings may help in understanding the course and prognosis of IBTR patients and identifying high-risk IBTR to establish management strategies.

Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery Versus Salvage Mastectomy for Ipsilateral Breast Tumour Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Salvage mastectomy (SM) is the standard surgery for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR). However, whether repeat breast-conserving surgery (RBCS) is an alternative method remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of RBCS and SM after IBTR for breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley Online and Embase for controlled studies comparing RBCS and SM after IBTR for BCS (published between 1993 and 2019, published in English). Our main endpoints were the secondary local recurrence rate (SLRR), distant metastasis rate (DMR) and overall survival (OS). We used a random-effects model or fixed-effects model for data pooling.

Results

Fifteen of the 424 eligible studies were ultimately included, and all studies were retrospective cohort studies (n=2532 participants). 1) SLRR: The SLRR of RBCS was higher than SM (pooled relative rate (pRR) = 1.87, 95% CI 1.22 - 2.86, P=0.004). Stratified analysis was performed according to whether radiotherapy was performed after salvage surgery (radiotherapy group: 2ndRT, no radiotherapy group: no-2ndRT), and the following results were revealed: pRR=0.43 (95% CI 0.20-0.95, P=0.04) for group 2ndRT; and pRR=2.30 (95% CI 1.72-3.06, P<0.00001) for group no-2ndRT. These results showed that the main cause of heterogeneity was salvage radiotherapy. 2) DMR: No significant difference in the DMR was observed between RBCS and SM (pRR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 - 1.01, P=0.05). 3) OS: No significant difference in OS was observed between RBCS and SM (pRR=0.65, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.08, P=0.10).

Conclusions

The SLRR of RBCS was higher than SM for ITBR after BCS, but survival was not affected. RBCS may be used as an alternative for IBTR patients after BCS with strict control for several indications, such as tumor size, recurrence interval and biological behavior, and attaching importance to subsequent salvage radiotherapy and systematic therapy.

Loco-regional outcomes of adjusted breast radiotherapy with conventional fractionation after breast conserving surgery: De-escalation of whole breast irradiation dose

We compared the cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) between 2 whole breast irradiation (WBI) dose range with conventional fractionation.We retrospectively reviewed 1122 patients who received WBI at 2 institutions between 2004 and 2012. One institution delivered WBI 41.4 to 45 Gy followed by boost 14 to 18 Gy (adjusted group), while the other delivered WBI 50 to 50.4 Gy followed by boost 10 Gy (standard group).The median follow-up period was 85 months. The 10-year cumulative incidence in all patients was 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3%-8.4%) for IBTR and 3.0% (95% CI: 1.7%-4.8%) for regional recurrence. The 10-year cumulative incidence of IBTR was not significantly influenced by WBI dose (6.3% in the adjusted group vs 5.2% in the standard group, P = .136). Comparable IBTR rates between the 2 groups were observed regardless of clinical and pathological factors. The WBI dose was not significantly associated with the 10-year cumulative incidence of regional recurrence in these groups (3.5% in the adjusted group vs 0.5% in the standard group, P = .214).De-escalated WBI doses while intensifying tumor bed boost did not compromise local and regional outcomes compared to standard group.

Second breast conserving therapy after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence - a 10-year experience of re-irradiation

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of post-operative partial breast re-irradiation with multi-catheter brachytherapy after second breast conserving therapy (BCT) in patients with small, low-risk ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).

Material and methods

Between 2008 and 2018, 19 consecutive patients with low-risk IBTR (max. rpT1 cN0 cM0, Her2 negative, preferably positive hormone receptor status) who refused mastectomy were treated with salvage lumpectomy, followed by post-operative partial breast re-irradiation with multi-catheter brachytherapy. Eight patients were irradiated using PDR brachytherapy (49.8-50.4 Gy in pulses of 0.5-0.7 Gy) and 11 patients using HDR brachytherapy (34.2 Gy in fractions of 3.8 Gy or 32 Gy in fractions of 4 Gy). All patients had undergone prior BCT for their primary tumor, followed by adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy. Local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) as well as toxicity were evaluated in the present study.

Results

After a median follow-up of 65 months following IBTR (18-120 months), only one second IBTR in 19 patients was diagnosed 77 months after re-irradiation, resulting in a LC rate of 100% at 5 years. DFS and OS rates were both 100% at 5 years following re-irradiation. Except for the above mentioned second IBTR, no regional or distant relapse was recorded. Regarding toxicity, 63% of patients developed adverse events (CTCAE grade ≤ 2), with fibrosis detected in 37% (7/19) of patients, necrosis in 11% (2/19), hyperpigmentation in 47% (9/19), and telangiectasia in 11% (2/19), respectively. No patient showed a high-grade (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) adverse event.

Conclusions

In case of small, low-risk IBTR, adjuvant re-irradiation using multi-catheter brachytherapy is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment method after repeated lumpectomy, and an alternative to mastectomy.

Efficacy of single-stage breast-conserving treatment using multicatheter partial breast brachytherapy evaluated by GEC-ESTRO phase 3 trial

Purpose

The GEC-ESTRO has reported the equivalent outcomes of partial breast irradiation (PBI) using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MCB) to whole breast irradiation (WBI) in breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We performed single-stage BCT with partial breast brachytherapy by intraoperative catheter placement. After the categorization of patients into inclusion and exclusion criteria on this trial, our databases were evaluated in order to translate it to Japanese patients.

Material and methods

Patients undergoing BCT were retrospectively examined between November 2007 and December 2015. The technique is an open-cavity implant with a dose of 32 Gy in 8 fractions. The 4-year clinical outcomes of MCB-PBI were evaluated in the 2 distinct categories, and the comparison of the outcomes of MCB-PBI with WBI was performed in patients with unfavorable features.

Results

Of a total of 501 lesions undergoing BCT, 301 lesions were treated with MCB-PBI and 200 lesions with WBI. At the median follow-up time of 52 months, the 4-year rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free, disease-free (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with MCB-PBI and WBI were 98.9% vs. 98.0% (p = 0.56), 97.0% vs. 95.3% (p = 0.78), and 99.6% vs. 98.2% (p = 0.38), respectively. Although in exclusion cohort treated with MCB-PBI, IBTR-free, and disease-free survival were significantly worse than in inclusion cohort, non-significantly worse outcomes was demonstrated than in exclusion cohort with WBI; IBTR-free survival (95.0% vs. 97.2%, p = 0.24), and disease-free survival (95.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.31).

Conclusions

Single-stage BCT using MCB-PBI offered similar tumor control rates compering to WBI. However, further research is needed to define the benefit for patients with an exclusion criteria.

Safety for Repeat Lumpectomy Without Radiotherapy for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

BACKGROUND

There is little information on the local recurrence risk of patients who undergo repeat lumpectomy without radiotherapy after salvage surgery for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients who underwent repeat lumpectomy without radiotherapy after IBTR were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors of second IBTR, including the breast cancer subtype of IBTR defined by the estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 status, were assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 62 months. The 5-year second IBTR-free survival rate was 83%. Patients with the ER-positive/HER2-negative subtype of IBTR had a significantly better second IBTR-free survival rate than those with other subtypes of IBTR (88% vs. 75%, respectively, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that the breast cancer subtype of IBTR was a significantly independent predictive factor of second IBTR-free survival (p=0.003). A low-risk group for second IBTR, defined by the breast cancer subtype of IBTR and margin status of primary surgery, was detected (5-year second IBTR-free survival rate: 100%).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the low-risk group defined by the breast cancer subtype of IBTR and margin status of primary surgery could safely undergo repeat lumpectomy without radiotherapy for IBTR.

Distant recurrence risk following early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence

At present, the risk factors for distant recurrence among patients with early ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) require further investigation. Early IBTR is defined as occurring within 3 years following the initial surgery. In the current study, 40 patients with early IBTR were examined to determine the risk factors for distant recurrence. A node-positive status at the time of primary surgery and the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy following the primary surgery were significantly correlated with poorer distant disease-free survival (P=0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that the nodal status at the time of primary surgery was an independent predictive factor for distant recurrence (P=0.050). Therefore, the results of the current study revealed that the nodal status at the time of primary surgery was an independent predictive factor for distant recurrence among patients with early IBTR.

Evaluation of ALDH1 expression in ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) is a cancer stem cell (CSC) marker that is easily evaluable. The expression and clinical significance of ALDH1 in ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) has yet to be investigated. In the present study, the expression profile of ALDH1 and its correlation with prognosis in IBTR tissues was examined. Patients with IBTR from eight institutions were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine ALDH1 expression patterns in the tissue specimens of primary cancers and IBTRs. ALDH1 expression levels were investigated in 182 IBTR tumors, which included cases of invasive carcinoma selected from 271 consecutive patients with IBTR. ALDH1 was expressed in 23% of the IBTR tissue samples. The rate of concordant expression between primary cancer and IBTR tissues was 68%. There was no significant association between disease-free survival (DFS) and ALDH1 expression levels in IBTR. IBTRs that expressed ALDH1 and Ki-67 had a poorer prognosis and this expression pattern was significantly associated with DFS (P=0.0073). The percentages of ALDH1 positive expression in each tissue subtype were as follows: Luminal A, 20%; luminal B, 24%; human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), 35%; triple-negative, 21%. There was a significant correlation between DFS and ALDH1 expression levels in HER2-type IBTR tissue specimens (P=0.034). In conclusion, it is possible that ALDH1 and Ki-67 expression levels may be useful for predicting prognosis in patients with HER2-type tumors.

True Local Recurrences after Breast Conserving Surgery have Poor Prognosis in Patients with Early Breast Cancer

Background:

This study was aimed at investigating clinical and histopathologic features of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) and their effects on survival after breast conservation therapy.

Methods:

1,400 patients who were treated between 1998 and 2007 and had breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for early breast cancer (cT1-2/N0-1/M0) were evaluated. Demographic and pathologic parameters, radiologic data, treatment, and follow-up related features of the patients were recorded.

Results:

53 patients (3.8%) had IBTR after BCS within a median follow-up of 70 months. The mean age was 45.7 years (range, 27-87 years), and 22 patients (41.5%) were younger than 40 years. 33 patients (62.3%) had true recurrence (TR) and 20 were classified as new primary (NP). The median time to recurrence was shorter in TR group than in NP group (37.0 (6-216) and 47.5 (11-192) months respectively; p = 0.338). Progesterone receptor positivity was significantly higher in the NP group (p = 0.005). The overall 5-year survival rate in the NP group (95.0%) was significantly higher than that of the TR group (74.7%, p < 0.033). Multivariate analysis showed that younger age (<40 years), large tumor size (>20 mm), high grade tumor and triple-negative molecular phenotype along with developing TR negatively affected overall survival (hazard ratios were 4.2 (CI 0.98-22.76), 4.6 (CI 1.07-13.03), 4.0 (CI 0.68-46.10), 6.5 (CI 0.03-0.68), and 6.5 (CI 0.02- 0.80) respectively, p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Most of the local recurrences after BCS in our study were true recurrences, which resulted in a poorer outcome as compared to new primary tumors. Moreover, younger age (<40), large tumor size (>2 cm), high grade, triple negative phenotype, and having true recurrence were identified as independent prognostic factors with a negative impact on overall survival in this dataset of patients with recurrent breast cancer. In conjunction with a more intensive follow-up program, the role of adjuvant therapy strategies should be explored further in young patients with large and high-risk tumors to reduce the risk of TR.

Association of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and resistance to endocrine therapy

The effect of prior endocrine therapy on tumor biology and clinical outcomes of locoregional recurrence remains unclear. A total of 76 patients, who underwent salvage breast surgery for estrogen receptor-positive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) following breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer, were retrospectively reviewed to investigate the association of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status with the characteristics of IBTR and clinical outcomes following resection of IBTR. There was a tendency for more patients with HER2-positive IBTR to show resistance to endocrine therapy (71.4%) compared with those with HER2-negative IBTR (37.3%) (P=0.085). Patients with HER2-positive IBTR exhibited a higher rate of recurrence (62.5%) compared with those with HER2-negative IBTR (25.0%) (P=0.027). These results suggested that HER2-positive IBTR may be associated with resistance to endocrine therapy and a poorer clinical outcome.

Four types of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery: classification of IBTR based on precise pathological examination

We classified ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTRs) based on strict pathological rules. Ninety-six women who were surgically treated for IBTR were included. IBTRs were classified according to their origins and were distinguished based on strict pathological rules: relationship between the IBTR and the primary lumpectomy scar, surgical margin status of the primary cancer, and the presence of in situ lesions of IBTR. The prognosis of these subgroups were compared to that of new primary tumors (NP) in the narrow sense (NPn) that occurred far from the scar. Distant-disease free survival of IBTR that occurred close to the scar with in situ lesions and a negative surgical margin of the primary cancer (NP occurred close to the scar, NPcs) was similar to that of NPn. In contrast, IBTR that occurred close to the scar without in situ lesions (true recurrence (TR) that arose from residual invasive carcinoma foci, TRinv) had significantly poorer prognosis than NPn. IBTR that occurred close to the scar with in situ lesions and a positive surgical margin of the primary cancer (TR arising from a residual in situ lesion, TRis) had more late recurrences than NPcs. Precise pathological examinations indicated four distinct IBTR subtypes with different characteristics.

Regional lymphatic recurrence after salvage surgery for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence of breast cancer without local treatment for regional lymphatic basin

BACKGROUND

There is limited information regarding rates of and risk factors for regional lymphatic recurrence (RLR) after salvage surgery for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) without local treatment for the regional lymphatic basin.

METHODS

One hundred two patients, who underwent salvage breast surgery without local treatment for the regional lymphatic basin (surgery or radiotherapy) for IBTR that relapsed after breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer, were reviewed retrospectively to examine the rate of and risk factors for RLR.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients, 9 patients (8.8%) had RLR with a median follow-up period of 3.7 years after salvage breast surgery for IBTR. The estrogen receptor (ER) status and lymphovascular invasion of the recurrent breast tumor were both independent predictive factors of RLR (P = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of RLR was not low in patients with IBTR who received salvage breast surgery only without any treatment for the regional lymphatic basin. The ER status and lymphovascular invasion of the recurrent breast tumor were predictive factors of RLR.

The importance of systemic therapy in minimizing local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery: the NSABP experience

Adjuvant systemic therapy significantly reduces rates of distant recurrence and death. The effect of systemic therapy is not limited to reducing distant recurrences but also extends to reducing loco-regional recurrences, and rates of loco-regional recurrence have steadily declined over the past 25 years. This review focuses on the effect of adjuvant systemic therapy on rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence following lumpectomy plus breast irradiation in several pivotal NSABP trials in early-stage breast cancer.

Intratumoral Immune Responses Can Distinguish New Primary and True Recurrence Types of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrences (IBTR)

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is an increasingly common clinical challenge. IBTRs include True Recurrences (TR; persistent disease) and New Primaries (NP; de novo tumors), but discrimination between these is difficult. We assessed tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TIL) as biomarkers for distinguishing these types of IBTR using primary tumors and matched IBTRs from 24 breast cancer patients, half of which were identified as putative TRs and half as NPs using a previously reported clinical algorithm. Intratumoral lymphocyte populations (CD3, CD8, CD4, CD25, FOXP3, TIA1, CD20) and macrophages (CD68) were quantified by immunohistochemistry in each tumor. Compared to matched primaries, TRs showed significant trends towards increased CD3(+) and CD8(+) TIL, while these populations were often diminished in NPs. Comparison of IBTRs showed that TRs had significantly higher levels of CD3(+) (P = 0.0136), CD8(+) (P = 0.0092), and CD25(+) (P = 0.0159) TIL than NPs. We conclude that TIL may be a novel diagnostic biomarker to distinguish NP from TR IBTRs.