Adjuvant Therapy of High-Risk (Stages IIC-IV) Malignant Melanoma in the Post Interferon-Alpha Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant-adjuvant targeted therapy in borderline resectable stage IIIB-D and IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma was expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment only.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)/MEK inhibitors (MEKi) and surgery.

RESULTS

Twelve (26%) patients achieved a pathological complete response and 10 (21%) patients achieved a near-complete response. In the whole group, median recurrence-free survival was 19.4 months and median distant metastasis-free survival (mDMFS) was 21.9 months. In patients with a pathological complete response (pCR)/near-pCR median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were significantly longer than in patients with minor pathological response with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37 (p = .005) for RFS and HR = 0.33 (p = .002) for DMFS. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since BRAFi/MEKi therapy initiation was 25.1 months. The median time-to-treatment-failure since initiation of neoadjuvant therapy was 22.2 months and was significantly longer in patients with pCR/near-pCR (HR = 0.45; p = .022). Neoadjuvant therapy did not result in any new specific complications of surgery. After 48 months, RFS and overall survival were 36.3% and 64.8% or 20% and 37.4% in patients with pCR/near-pCR and pathological partial response/pathological nonresponse, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors confirmed that BRAFi/MEKi combination is an effective and safe regimen in the perioperative treatment of stage III/IV melanoma. Major pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence including DMFS in these patients.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Our study presents a large comprehensive analysis of neoadjuvant-adjuvant systemic therapy in patients diagnosed with marginally resectable stage III or IV melanoma. Neoadjuvant therapy effectively reduced the volume of the disease, which facilitated subsequent surgical resection. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since therapy initiation was 25.1 months. Twelve patients had complete pathological response and 10 patients had a near-complete pathological response-and together they had median recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival significantly longer than in patients with pathological partial response or nonresponse. Complete/near-complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence-free, including distant metastasis-free, survival in these patients.

Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor + low-dose hydroxyurea efficiently kills BRAF inhibitor- and immune checkpoint inhibitor-resistant melanomas

Treatment of melanomas with targeted and immunotherapies has proven effective, but resistance to both treatments is a common outcome leaving a high proportion of patients without effective alternative treatment options. Replication stress is a common feature of melanomas, and this is effectively targeted using a combination of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) inhibitor and low-dose hydroxyurea (LDHU). This combination also promotes inflammatory and anti-tumour immune responses in vivo. Melanoma cell lines resistant to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) retain their sensitivity to CHK1i + LDHU, with sensitivity similar to that of parental tumours. In vivo, BRAFi-resistant and BRAFi-sensitive parental tumours produce an identical immune response with treatment.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Advanced Skin Cancers-Emerging Strategies for Clinical Management

Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with advanced skin cancers presents a significant clinical management dilemma. SOTRs and other immunosuppressed patients have been routinely excluded from ICI clinical trials with good reason: immune checkpoints play an important role in self- and allograft-tolerance and risk of acute allograft rejection reported in retrospective studies affects 10% to 65% of cases. These reports also confirm that cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma respond to ICI therapy, although response rates are generally lower than those observed in immunocompetent populations. Prospective trials are now of critical importance in further establishing ICI efficacy and safety. However, based on current knowledge, we recommend that ICIs should be offered to kidney transplant recipients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, or Merkel cell carcinoma if surgery and/or radiotherapy have failed. For kidney transplant recipients, this should be first line ahead of chemotherapy and targeted therapies. In SOTRs, the use of ICIs should be carefully considered with the benefits of ICIs versus risks of allograft rejection weighed up on a case-by-case basis as part of shared decision-making with patients. In all cases, parallel management of immunosuppression may be key to ICI responsiveness. We recommend maintaining immunosuppression before ICI initiation with a dual immunosuppressive regimen combining mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and either corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. Such modification of immunosuppression must be considered in the context of allograft risk (both rejection and also its subsequent treatment) and risk of tumor progression. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary approach should underpin all clinical decision-making in this challenging scenario.

Unmeasured factors are associated with the use of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in melanoma

BACKGROUND

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) was the standard treatment for patients with melanoma with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) until 2017 when data from the DeCOG-SLT and MLST-2 randomized trials challenged the survival benefit of this procedure. We assessed the contribution of patient, tumor and facility factors on the use of CLND in patients with surgically resected Stage III melanoma.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, patients who underwent surgical excision and were found to have a positive SLN from 2012 to 2017 were included. A multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model with a random intercept for the facility was used to determine the effect of patient, tumor, and facility variables on the risk of CLND. Reference effect measures (REMs) were used to compare the contribution of contextual effects (unknown facility variables) versus measured variables on the variation in CLND use.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2017, the overall use of CLND decreased from 59.9% to 26.5% (p < 0.0001). Overall, older patients and patients with government-based insurance were less likely to undergo CLND. Tumor factors associated with a decreased rate of CLND included primary tumor location on the lower limb, decreasing depth, and mitotic rate <1. However, the contribution of contextual effects to the variation in CLND use exceeded that of the measured facility, tumor, time, and patient variables.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a decrease in CLND use during the study period. However, there is still high variability in CLND use, mainly driven by unmeasured contextual effects.

Real-world clinical outcome and safety of adjuvant therapy in stage III melanoma patients: Data from two Academic Italian Institutions

Adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) have improved relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with stage III melanoma, although about 25% of them relapse within a year. However, real-world data on treatment efficacy and safety as well as management of treatment recurrences are still limited. We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients with stage III melanoma who received at least one cycle of anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or dabrafenib + trametinib as adjuvant therapy. Most of patients included into the analyses harbor BRAV600E mutation (66.4%) and had a stage IIIC melanoma (63.7%). Immunotherapy was administered in 48.7% of patients, whereas targeted therapy in 51.3% At data cut-off, median RFS was not reached with 12- and 24-months RFS of 81% and 64%, respectively. No new adverse events were registered. Thirty patients (26.5%) relapsed, mainly at distant sites. Patient treated with IO recurred mostly during adjuvant treatment (ON-treatment) while patients treated with TT relapsed at the end of treatment (OFF-treatment). At relapse, surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy were used alone or in combination. Among patients who started a first-line therapy, an excellent response switching to a different treatment was observed. Real-world outcomes and safety of adjuvant treatment for resected stage III melanoma appear comparable to clinical trials data. Moreover, management of recurrences depends on type of relapse (loco-regional vs distant) and timing (during vs OFF treatment). Furthermore, patients who relapse after adjuvant TT respond well to subsequent anti-PD1 based therapy.

Anorectal malignant mucosal melanoma

Anorectal mucosal melanoma (AMM) is a rare, aggressive malignancy. The symptoms of AMM mimic common benign conditions in the anus, such as haemorrhoids; hence diagnosis is often made late, a third of patients having metastasis at first presentation. Surgical resection remains the standard of treatment, and adjuvant therapy is varied, including immunotherapy, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy. The prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival of 20%. A 65year old woman presented with a five-year history of symptoms suggestive of haemorrhoids and was diagnosed with a malignant anorectal mucosal melanoma after symptoms worsened and further investigation was performed. She underwent surgical resection and is currently receiving adjuvant therapy. The prognosis of AMM, the lack of consensus on the treatment regimen to date, and the need for a high index of suspicion for early diagnosis are discussed.

Funding

None declared.

Ulcerated Cutaneous Melanoma: A Review of the Clinical, Histologic, and Molecular Features Associated with a Clinically Aggressive Histologic Phenotype

The presence of ulceration in melanoma is associated with poor clinical outcomes and is the third most powerful predictor of survival in the AJCC Melanoma Staging System after tumor thickness and mitotic activity. The aggressive biological behavior associated with ulceration has been hypothesized to be the result of an intrinsic biological attribute that favors dissemination and presents locally with the loss of epidermal integrity. Among the features of ulcerated melanoma, many show promise as potential prognostic tools, markers of differential immunogenicity and indicators of oncogenic drivers of invasion and metastasis. The incidence of ulcerated melanoma is greater in males, increases with age and with systemic inflammatory risk factors (diabetes, smoking, low vitamin D, elevated body mass index). Patients with ulcerated primary tumors seem to exclusively benefit from adjuvant interferon (IFN) therapy, which is likely the consequence of an altered tumor microenvironment. When ulceration is present, there is a higher density of macrophages and dendritic cells and enhanced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6. There is also an increased expression of proteins involved in tumor antigen presentation in ulcerated melanomas. Histologically, vascular density, vasculogenic mimicry and angiotropism are all significantly correlated with ulceration in melanoma. The presence of ulceration is associated with reduced protein expression of E-cadherin and PTEN and elevated levels of N-cadherin and the matrix metalloproteinases. Differential microRNA expression also holds promise as a potential prognostic biomarker of malignancy and disease spread within the setting of ulceration. However, the molecular and cellular differences associated with the ulcerated state are complex and further study will aid in determining how these differences can be harnessed to improve care for patients with melanoma.

Epidemiology of Melanoma in Spain: Estimation of Number of Patients With Stage III Disease Eligible for Adjuvant Therapies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Accurate information on the incidence of melanoma by stage and a better understanding of transition between stages are important for determining the burden of disease and assessing the impact of new adjuvant therapies on recurrence and survival. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence rates of the various stages of melanoma in Spain and to estimate the number of patients with stage III disease who are eligible for adjuvant systemic therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We built an epidemiological model using prospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with de novo or recurrent melanoma between 2012 and 2016 in the melanoma units of 4 public hospitals.

RESULTS

The estimated crude incidence rates for stage I and II melanoma were 7 and 2.9 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The corresponding rates for stage III and IV melanoma were 1.9 and 1.3 cases per 100,000 person-years; 25.8% of patients with stage III melanoma were stage IIIA, 47% were stage IIIB, and 27.3% were stage IIIC. The respective estimated incidence rates for recurrent stage III and IV melanoma were 1.1 and 0.9 cases per 100,000 person-years. Overall, 54% of patients with recurrent stage III melanoma had progressed from stage I or II; the other cases corresponded to changes in substage. Of the patients with stage III melanoma, 85% of those with a de novo diagnosis and 80% of those who had relapsed had resectable disease, meaning they were eligible for adjuvant therapy; 47% of these patients had a BRAF mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

The above estimates could have a major impact on health care resource planning. Assessing the number of patients with melanoma who are eligible for adjuvant therapies in melanoma could help decision-makers and clinicians anticipate future needs for the management of this disease.

NRF2 and Key Transcriptional Targets in Melanoma Redox Manipulation

Melanocytes are dendritic, pigment-producing cells located in the skin and are responsible for its protection against the deleterious effects of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR), which include DNA damage and elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS). They do so by synthesizing photoprotective melanin pigments and distributing them to adjacent skin cells (e.g., keratinocytes). However, melanocytes encounter a large burden of oxidative stress during this process, due to both exogenous and endogenous sources. Therefore, melanocytes employ numerous antioxidant defenses to protect themselves; these are largely regulated by the master stress response transcription factor, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2). Key effector transcriptional targets of NRF2 include the components of the glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidant systems. Despite these defenses, melanocyte DNA often is subject to mutations that result in the dysregulation of the proliferative mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the cell cycle. Following tumor initiation, endogenous antioxidant systems are co-opted, a consequence of elevated oxidative stress caused by metabolic reprogramming, to establish an altered redox homeostasis. This altered redox homeostasis contributes to tumor progression and metastasis, while also complicating the application of exogenous antioxidant treatments. Further understanding of melanocyte redox homeostasis, in the presence or absence of disease, would contribute to the development of novel therapies to aid in the prevention and treatment of melanomas and other skin diseases.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy for Borderline Resectable III B-D or IV Stage BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma

Simple Summary

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma is expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery. 46 patients were treated with BRAFi/MEKi or BRAFi before surgery with 78% R0 resection. In patients with a major pathological response with no, or less than 10%, viable cells in the tumor, median DFS and PFS were significantly longer than in patients with a minor pathological response.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma is expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment as it is for sarcoma, breast, rectal, esophageal, or gastric cancers. Patients with locoregional recurrence after initial surgery and those with advanced regional lymphatic metastases are at a high risk of relapse and melanoma-related death. There is an unmet clinical need to improve the outcomes for such patients. Patients with resectable bulky stage III or resectable stage IV histologically confirmed melanoma were enrolled and received standard-dose BRAFi/MEKi for at least 12 weeks before feasible resection of the pre-therapy target and then received at least for the next 40 weeks further BRAFi/MEKi. Of these patients, 37 were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib, three were treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib, five with vemurafenib, and one with dabrafenib alone. All patients underwent surgery with 78% microscopically margin-negative resection (R0) resection. Ten patients achieved a complete pathological response. In patients with a major pathological response with no, or less than 10%, viable cells in the tumor, median disease free survival and progression free survival were significantly longer than in patients with a minor pathological response. No patient discontinued neoadjuvant BRAFi/MEKi due to toxicity. BRAFi/MEKi pre-treatment did not result in any new specific complications of surgery. Fourteen patients experienced disease recurrence or progression during post-operative treatment. We confirmed that BRAFi/MEKi combination is an effective and safe regimen in the perioperative treatment of melanoma. Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment may be considered as a surrogate biomarker of disease recurrence.

Signal pathways of melanoma and targeted therapy

Melanoma is the most lethal skin cancer that originates from the malignant transformation of melanocytes. Although melanoma has long been regarded as a cancerous malignancy with few therapeutic options, increased biological understanding and unprecedented innovations in therapies targeting mutated driver genes and immune checkpoints have substantially improved the prognosis of patients. However, the low response rate and inevitable occurrence of resistance to currently available targeted therapies have posed the obstacle in the path of melanoma management to obtain further amelioration. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying melanoma pathogenesis more comprehensively, which might lead to more substantial progress in therapeutic approaches and expand clinical options for melanoma therapy. In this review, we firstly make a brief introduction to melanoma epidemiology, clinical subtypes, risk factors, and current therapies. Then, the signal pathways orchestrating melanoma pathogenesis, including genetic mutations, key transcriptional regulators, epigenetic dysregulations, metabolic reprogramming, crucial metastasis-related signals, tumor-promoting inflammatory pathways, and pro-angiogenic factors, have been systemically reviewed and discussed. Subsequently, we outline current progresses in therapies targeting mutated driver genes and immune checkpoints, as well as the mechanisms underlying the treatment resistance. Finally, the prospects and challenges in the development of melanoma therapy, especially immunotherapy and related ongoing clinical trials, are summarized and discussed.

Retrospective analysis of adjuvant therapy using dabrafenib plus trametinib in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma: analysis of 36 cases

Patients with resected stage IIIB, IIIC and IIID melanomas have a high risk of recurrence. Therefore, an appropriate protocol for stage III melanoma is needed. Since adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) combined therapy and anti-PD1 antibody (Ab) therapy reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with resected stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma, selecting the adjuvant therapy for BRAF-mutated melanoma is controversial. The efficacy and safety profiles of D+T combined therapy in the adjuvant setting were retrospectively analyzed in 36 Japanese. BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma patients. The relapse-free rate (RFR) at 12 months was 82.1% (95% confidential interval (CI), 63.9-92.6%). In the 21 patients who completed the protocol, the RFR at 12 months was 85.7% (95% CI, 64.5-95.9%). In the seven patients whose protocol was interrupted by adverse events, the RFR was 71.4% (95% CI, 35.2-92.4%). The incidence rate of any AEs for all patients was 69.7% (95% CI, 52.5-82.8%), including 13 cases of pyrexia, five cases of skin rash and four cases of liver dysfunction. The present study suggested that D+T therapy in the adjuvant setting is a useful and very tolerable protocol for BRAF-mutated melanoma in the Japanese population.