Diagnostic performance of adenosine deaminase for abdominal tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mistakes to avoid in the management of abdominal tuberculosis

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis and management of abdominal tuberculosis, i.e Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis (GITB) and tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) is challenging. Abdominal tuberculosis, presenting usually with abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, and constitutional symptoms, is typically a paucibacillary condition. The diagnosis hinges on a correct interpretation of clinical, radiological, histological, biochemical, and microbiological findings as also appropriately assessing response to therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review potential missteps that could occur in managing GITB and TBP sourced from published literature and clinical experience. These include avoiding excess use of tests with limited accuracy, understanding limitations of ascitic adenosine deaminase (ADA) and granulomas, avoiding empirical antitubercular therapy (ATT) where possible but also understanding that microbiological tests may not always be positive, and finally not to bank solely on subjective clinical responses but to use objective markers in assessing response to therapy. In addition, diagnosis of predisposing immunosuppressed states, attention to nutrition, appropriate management of sequelae with endoscopic dilatation/surgery, and early surgery when indicated are some of the additional issues discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

In future, a more secure diagnosis banking on the use of better microbiological tools, multiparameter-based models, artificial intelligence-based approaches, and use of advances in -omics-based approaches can improve diagnosis and avoid some missteps.

Novel RNA biomarkers improve discrimination of children with tuberculosis disease from those with non-TB pneumonia after in vitro stimulation

The diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis (TB) poses a challenge for clinical teams worldwide. TB-mediated changes in the expression of host genes in the peripheral blood can serve as diagnostic biomarkers and can provide better insights into the host immune mechanisms of childhood TB. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from children (n=102) with microbiologically confirmed TB disease, TB infection (TBI), pneumonia, and healthy controls (HC) were stimulated with either the Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) or the Early Secretory Antigen 6kDa-Culture Filtrate Protein 10 (ESAT6-CFP10) complex of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). RNA was extracted and quantified using gene expression microarrays. Differential expression analysis was performed comparing microbiologically confirmed TB to the other diagnostic groups for the stimulated and unstimulated samples. Using variable selection, we identified sparse diagnostic gene signatures; one gene (PID1) was able to distinguish TB from pneumonia after ESAT6-CFP10 stimulation with an AUC of 100% in the test set, while a combination of two genes (STAT1 and IFI44) achieved an AUC of 91.7% (CI95% 75.0%-100%) in the test set after PPD stimulation. The number of significantly differentially expressed (SDE) genes was higher when contrasting TB to pneumonia or HC in stimulated samples, compared to unstimulated ones, leading to a larger pool of candidate diagnostic biomarkers. Our approach provides enlightened aspects of peripheral TB-specific responses and can form the basis for a point of care test meeting the World Health Organization (WHO) Target Product Profile (TPP) for pediatric TB.

Tuberculosis Diagnosis: Current, Ongoing, and Future Approaches

Tuberculosis (TB) remains an impactful infectious disease, leading to millions of deaths every year. Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes the formation of granulomas, which will determine, through the host-pathogen relationship, if the infection will remain latent or evolve into active disease. Early TB diagnosis is life-saving, especially among immunocompromised individuals, and leads to proper treatment, preventing transmission. This review addresses different approaches to diagnosing TB, from traditional methods such as sputum smear microscopy to more advanced molecular techniques. Integrating these techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), has significantly improved the sensitivity and specificity of M. tuberculosis identification. Additionally, exploring novel biomarkers and applying artificial intelligence in radiological imaging contribute to more accurate and rapid diagnosis. Furthermore, we discuss the challenges of existing diagnostic methods, including limitations in resource-limited settings and the emergence of drug-resistant strains. While the primary focus of this review is on TB diagnosis, we also briefly explore the challenges and strategies for diagnosing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). In conclusion, this review provides an overview of the current landscape of TB diagnostics, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and innovation. As the field evolves, it is crucial to ensure that these advancements are accessible and applicable in diverse healthcare settings to effectively combat tuberculosis worldwide.

ISCCM Position Statement on the Approach to and Management of Critically Ill Patients with Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality globally. About 3-4% of hospitalized TB patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU); the mortality in these patients is around 50-60%. There is limited literature on the evaluation and management of patients with TB who required ICU admission. The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM) constituted a working group to develop a position paper that provides recommendations on the various aspects of TB in the ICU setting based on available evidence. Seven domains were identified including the categorization of TB in the critically ill, diagnostic workup, drug therapy, TB in the immunocompromised host, organ support, infection control, and post-TB sequelae. Forty-one questions pertaining to these domains were identified and evidence-based position statements were generated, where available, keeping in focus the critical care aspects. Where evidence was not available, the recommendations were based on consensus. This position paper guides the approach to and management of critically ill patients with TB.

How to cite this article

Chacko B, Chaudhry D, Peter JV, Khilnani G, Saxena P, Sehgal IS, et al. isccm Position Statement on the Approach to and Management of Critically Ill Patients with Tuberculosis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S67-S91.

Peritoneal tuberculosis masquerading as an ovarian malignancy in a young female: A case report

The clinical manifestations of peritoneal tuberculosis are quite variable, nonspecific and mimic many diseases and pathological conditions such as lymphoma, and ovarian malignancy. Due to this clinical overlap and limited accuracy of diagnostic tests, more awareness of this disease is required to enable early diagnosis and prompt treatment. This is a case of a 25-year-old female with no known chronic illness who presented with worsening generalized abdominal pains and distension of 2 months duration. There was an associated significant weight loss of 17 kg. She was initially diagnosed with ovarian malignancy based of ultrasound findings and elevated CA-125 levels. However, further evaluation later was consistent with peritoneal tuberculosis for which she was treated. Her symptoms resolved completely after 6 months of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Diagnosis of abdominal TB remains challenging as it is non-specific. Its features and clinical manifestation overlap with other conditions such as ovarian malignancy. A high index of suspicions and judicious application of the available diagnostic test is need for prompt diagnosis. No single test can effectively diagnose peritoneal TB, but a combination of history, and radiological, immunologic, molecular, and cytologic tests are important.

Adenosine deaminase from the cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of adenosine deaminase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for tuberculous meningitis (TBM), and the potential influence of patients' age groups and cutoffs of measured adenosine deaminase.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 studies with 1653 patients with TBM and 3417 controls without were included. Pooled results showed that adenosine deaminase in CSF is associated with satisfactory diagnostic efficacy for TBM, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.90), specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), positive likelihood ratio of 7.70 (95% CI: 6.16-9.63), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.15 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20). The pooled receiver operating characteristic (AUC) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96), suggesting good performance. Subgroup analyses showed good diagnostic efficacies of adenosine deaminase in CSF for both adults (AUC 0.95) and children (AUC 0.96) with TBM. AUCs indicating the diagnostic accuracies of adenosine deaminase in CSF for TBM were 0.93 for studies with cutoffs <10 U/L and and 0.94 for a cutoff =10 U/L, but only 0.90 for studies with cutoffs >10 U/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring adenosine deaminase of CSF shows satisfactory diagnostic efficacy for TBM in children and adults, particularly if using a cutoff ≤10 U/L.

Evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management of abdominal tuberculosis

Abdominal tuberculosis is an ancient problem with modern nuances in diagnosis and management. The two major forms are tuberculous peritonitis and gastrointestinal tuberculosis (GITB), while the less frequent forms are esophageal, gastroduodenal, pancreatic, hepatic, gallbladder and biliary tuberculosis. The clinicians need to discriminate the disease from the close mimics: peritoneal carcinomatosis closely mimics peritoneal tuberculosis, while Crohn's disease closely mimics intestinal tuberculosis. Imaging modalities (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and occasionally positron emission tomography) guide the line of evaluation. Research in diagnostics (imaging and endoscopy) has helped in the better acquisition of tissue for histological and microbiological tests. Although point-of-care polymerase chain reaction-based tests (e.g. Xpert Mtb/Rif) may provide a quick diagnosis, these have low sensitivity. In such situations, ancillary investigations such as ascitic adenosine deaminase and histological clues (granulomas, caseating necrosis, ulcers lined by histiocytes) may provide some specificity to the diagnosis. A diagnostic trial of antitubercular therapy (ATT) may be considered if all diagnostic armamentaria fail to clinch the diagnosis, especially in TB-endemic regions. Objective evaluation with clear endpoints of response is mandatory in such situations. Early mucosal response (healing of ulcers at two months) and resolution of ascites are objective criteria for early response assessment and should be sought at two months. Biomarkers, especially fecal calprotectin for intestinal tuberculosis, have also shown promise. For most forms of abdominal tuberculosis, six months of ATT is sufficient. Sequelae of GITB may require endoscopic balloon dilatation for intestinal strictures or surgical intervention for recurrent intestinal obstruction, perforation or massive bleeding.