1
|
Nicoll A, Roulstone S, Williams B, Maxwell M. Understanding capacity for implementing new interventions: A qualitative study of speech and language therapy services for children with speech sound disorder. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 59:1002-1017. [PMID: 37929610 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many speech sound disorder (SSD) interventions with a long-term evidence base are 'new' to clinical practice, and the role of services in supporting or constraining capacity for practice change is underexplored. Innovations from implementation science may offer solutions to this research-practice gap but have not previously been applied to SSD. AIM To explain variation in speech and language therapy service capacity to implement new SSD interventions. METHODS & PROCEDURES We conducted an intensive, case-based qualitative study with 42 speech and language therapists (SLTs) in three NHS services (n = 39) and private practice (n = 3) in Scotland. We explored therapists' diverse experiences of SSD practice change through individual interviews (n = 28) or self-generated paired (n = 2) or focus groups (n = 3). A theoretical framework (Normalization Process Theory) helped us understand how the service context contributed to the way therapists engaged with different practice changes. OUTCOMES & RESULTS We identified six types ('cases') of practice change, two of which involved the new SSD interventions. We focus on these two cases ('Transforming' and 'Venturing') and use Normalization Process Theory's Cognitive participation construct to explain implementation (or not) of new SSD interventions in routine practice. Therapists were becoming aware of the new interventions through knowledge brokers, professional networks and an intervention database. In the Transforming case, new SSD interventions for selected children were becoming part of local routine practice. Transforming was the result of a favourable service structure, a sustained and supported 'push' that made implementation of the new interventions a service priority, and considerable collective time to think about doing it. 'Venturing' happened where the new SSD interventions were not a service priority. It involved individual or informal groups of therapists trying out or using one or more of the new interventions with selected children within the constraints of their service context. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS New, evidence-based SSD interventions may be challenging to implement in routine practice because they have in common a need for therapists who understand applied linguistics and can be flexible with service delivery. Appreciating what it really takes to do routine intervention differently is vital for managers and services who have to make decisions about priorities for implementation, along with realistic plans for resourcing and supporting it. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Many SSD interventions have an evidence base but are not widely adopted into routine clinical practice. Addressing this is not just about individual therapists or education/training, as workplace pressures and service delivery models make it difficult to change practice. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This paper applies innovations from implementation science to help explain how what is going on in services can support or constrain capacity for implementing evidence-based SSD interventions. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Service managers and therapists will have a clearer idea of the time and support they may realistically have to invest for new SSD interventions to be used routinely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avril Nicoll
- Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sue Roulstone
- Bristol Speech & Language Therapy Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Brian Williams
- UHI Institute of Health Research and Innovation, Centre for Health Science, Inverness, UK
| | - Margaret Maxwell
- NMAHP-RU, Pathfoot Building, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cassidy CE, Flynn R, Campbell A, Dobson L, Langley J, McNeil D, Milne E, Zanoni P, Churchill M, Benzies KM. Knowledge translation strategies used for sustainability of an evidence-based intervention in child health: a multimethod qualitative study. BMC Nurs 2024; 23:125. [PMID: 38368328 PMCID: PMC10874067 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01777-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sustainability of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is suboptimal in healthcare. Evidence on how knowledge translation (KT) strategies are used for the sustainability of EBIs in practice is lacking. This study examined what and how KT strategies were used to facilitate the sustainability of Alberta Family Integrated Care (FICare)™, a psychoeducational model of care scaled and spread across 14 neonatal intensive care units, in Alberta, Canada. METHODS First, we conducted an environmental scan of relevant documents to determine the use of KT strategies to support the sustainability of Alberta FICare™. Second, we conducted semi-structured interviews with decision makers and operational leaders to explore what and how KT strategies were used for the sustainability of Alberta FICare™, as well as barriers and facilitators to using the KT strategies for sustainability. We used the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) taxonomy to code the strategies. Lastly, we facilitated consultation meetings with the Alberta FICare™ leads to share and gain insights and clarification on our findings. RESULTS We identified nine KT strategies to facilitate the sustainability of Alberta FICare™: Conduct ongoing training; Identify and prepare local champions; Research co-production; Remind clinicians; Audit and provide feedback; Change record systems; Promote adaptability; Access new funding; and Involve patients/consumers and family members. A significant barrier to the sustainability of Alberta FICare™ was a lack of clarity on who was responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the intervention. A key facilitator to sustainability of Alberta FICare was its alignment with the Maternal, Newborn, Child & Youth Strategic Clinical Network (MNCY SCN) priorities. Co-production between researchers and health system partners in the design, implementation, and scale and spread of Alberta FICare™ was critical to sustainability. CONCLUSION This research highlights the importance of clearly articulating who is responsible for continued championing for the sustainability of EBIs. Additionally, our research demonstrates that the adaptation of interventions must be considered from the onset of implementation so interventions can be tailored to align with contextual barriers for sustainability. Clear guidance is needed to continually support researchers and health system leaders in co-producing strategies that facilitate the long-term sustainability of effective EBIs in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Cassidy
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, B3H 4R2, Halifax, NS, PO Box 15000, Canada.
| | - Rachel Flynn
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College of Cork, College Road, T12 AK54, Cork, Ireland
| | - Alyson Campbell
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, HSB Room 116, C1A 4P3, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
| | - Lauren Dobson
- Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Level 3, 11405 87 Avenue, T6G 1C9, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jodi Langley
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, 5790 University Avenue, B3H 1V7, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Deborah McNeil
- Strategic Clinical Networks, Alberta Health Services, 10101 Southport Road SW, T2W 3N2, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, T2N 1N4, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ella Milne
- Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, Level 3, 11405 87 Avenue, T6G 1C9, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Pilar Zanoni
- Faculty of Nursing , University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, T2N 1N4, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Megan Churchill
- Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health, 5980 University Ave #5850, B3K 6R8, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Karen M Benzies
- Faculty of Nursing, Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, T2N 1N4, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sansbury GM, Pence BW, Zimba C, Yanguela J, Landrum K, Matewere M, Mbota M, Malava JK, Tikhiwa H, Morrison AM, Akiba CF, Gaynes BN, Udedi M, Hosseinipour MC, Stockton MA. Improving integrated depression and non-communicable disease care in Malawi through engaged leadership and supportive implementation climate. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1413. [PMID: 38098079 PMCID: PMC10722817 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10344-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low- and middle-income countries often lack access to mental health services, leading to calls for integration within other primary care systems. In sub-Saharan Africa, integration of depression treatment in non-communicable disease (NCD) settings is feasible, acceptable, and effective. However, leadership and implementation climate challenges often hinder effective integration and quality of services. The aim of this study was to identify discrete leadership strategies that facilitate overcoming barriers to the integration of depression care in NCD clinics in Malawi and to understand how clinic leadership shapes the implementation climate. METHODS We conducted 39 in-depth interviews with the District Medical Officer, the NCD coordinator, one NCD provider, and the research assistant from each of the ten Malawian NCD clinics (note one District Medical Officer served two clinics). Based on semi-structured interview guides, participants were asked their perspectives on the impact of leadership and implementation climate on overcoming barriers to integrating depression care into existing NCD services. Thematic analysis used both inductive and deductive approaches to identify emerging themes and compare among participant type. RESULTS The results revealed how engaged leadership can fuel a positive implementation climate where clinics had heightened capacity to overcome implementation barriers. Effective leaders were approachable and engaged in daily operations of the clinic and problem-solving. They held direct involvement with and mentorship during the intervention, providing assistance in patient screening and consultation with treatment plans. Different levels of leadership utilized their respective standings and power dynamics to influence provider attitudes and perceptions surrounding the intervention. Leaders acted by informing providers about the intervention source and educating them on the importance of mental healthcare, as it was often undervalued. Lastly, they prioritized teamwork and collective ownership for the intervention, increasing provider responsibility. CONCLUSION Training that prioritizes leadership visibility and open communication will facilitate ongoing Malawi Ministry of Health efforts to scale up evidence-based depression treatment within NCD clinics. This proves useful where extensive and external monitoring may be limited. Ultimately, these results can inform successful strategies to close implementation gaps to achieve integration of mental health services in low-resource settings through improved leadership and implementation climate. TRIAL REGISTRATION These findings are reported from ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03711786. Registered on 18/10/2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03711786 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Griffin M Sansbury
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| | - Brian W Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Chifundo Zimba
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Juan Yanguela
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 1101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Kelsey Landrum
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Maureen Matewere
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - MacDonald Mbota
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Jullita K Malava
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU), P.O. Box 46, Chilumba, Karonga District, Malawi
| | - Harriet Tikhiwa
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Abigail M Morrison
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Christopher F Akiba
- RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA
| | - Bradley N Gaynes
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
- Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 101 Manning Dr #1, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Michael Udedi
- Malawi Ministry of Health and Population, Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health Clinical Services, P.O. Box 30377, Lilongwe, 3, Malawi
| | - Mina C Hosseinipour
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 101 Manning Dr #1, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Melissa A Stockton
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miao M, Morrow R, Salomon A, Mcculloch B, Evain JC, Wright MR, Murphy MT, Welsh M, Williams L, Power E, Rietdijk R, Debono D, Brunner M, Togher L. Digital Health Implementation Strategies Coproduced With Adults With Acquired Brain Injury, Their Close Others, and Clinicians: Mixed Methods Study With Collaborative Autoethnography and Network Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e46396. [PMID: 37725413 PMCID: PMC10548320 DOI: 10.2196/46396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired brain injuries (ABIs), such as stroke and traumatic brain injury, commonly cause cognitive-communication disorders, in which underlying cognitive difficulties also impair communication. As communication is an exchange with others, close others such as family and friends also experience the impact of cognitive-communication impairment. It is therefore an internationally recommended best practice for speech-language pathologists to provide communication support to both people with ABI and the people who communicate with them. Current research also identifies a need for neurorehabilitation professionals to support digital communication, such as social media use, after ABI. However, with >135 million people worldwide affected by ABI, alternate and supplementary service delivery models are needed to meet these communication needs. The "Social Brain Toolkit" is a novel suite of 3 interventions to deliver communication rehabilitation via the internet. However, digital health implementation is complex, and minimal guidance exists for ABI. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to support the implementation of the Social Brain Toolkit by coproducing implementation knowledge with people with ABI, people who communicate with people with ABI, clinicians, and leaders in digital health implementation. METHODS A maximum variation sample (N=35) of individuals with living experience of ABI, close others, clinicians, and digital health implementation leaders participated in an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. Stakeholders quantitatively prioritized 4 of the 7 theoretical domains of the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework as being the most important for Social Brain Toolkit implementation. Qualitative interview and focus group data collection focused on these 4 domains. Data were deductively analyzed against the NASSS framework with stakeholder coauthors to determine implementation considerations and strategies. A collaborative autoethnography of the research was conducted. Interrelationships between considerations and strategies were identified through a post hoc network analysis. RESULTS Across the 4 prioritized domains of "condition," "technology," "value proposition," and "adopters," 48 digital health implementation considerations and 52 tailored developer and clinician implementation strategies were generated. Benefits and challenges of coproduction were identified. The post hoc network analysis revealed 172 unique relationships between the identified implementation considerations and strategies, with user and persona testing and responsive design identified as the potentially most impactful strategies. CONCLUSIONS People with ABI, close others, clinicians, and digital health leaders coproduced new knowledge of digital health implementation considerations for adults with ABI and the people who communicate with them, as well as tailored implementation strategies. Complexity-informed network analyses offered a data-driven method to identify the 2 most potentially impactful strategies. Although the study was limited by a focus on 4 NASSS domains and the underrepresentation of certain demographics, the wealth of actionable implementation knowledge produced supports future coproduction of implementation research with mutually beneficial outcomes for stakeholders and researchers. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/35080.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Miao
- Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rosemary Morrow
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander Salomon
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ben Mcculloch
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jean-Christophe Evain
- Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Ward, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health Network, Melbourne, Australia
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Meg Rebecca Wright
- Stakeholder with living experience of acquired brain injury, Blenheim, Australia
| | - Marie Therese Murphy
- Stakeholder with living experience as a communication partner of a person with acquired brain injury, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Education, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Monica Welsh
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, South Australian Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Liz Williams
- Brain Injury Rehabilitation Community and Home (BIRCH), South Australian Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachael Rietdijk
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Deborah Debono
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Melissa Brunner
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|